| dc.contributor | 問題與研究 | - |
| dc.creator (作者) | 莫大華 | - |
| dc.creator (作者) | Mo, Da-Hua | - |
| dc.date (日期) | 2000-11 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 15-Apr-2019 16:35:22 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 15-Apr-2019 16:35:22 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 15-Apr-2019 16:35:22 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123052 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 黃文對於個人論文的誤解，源自黃文主觀地認定建構主義只有Wendt家別無分號，也未能理解建構主義的哲學背景以及建構主義在其他學科的影響，其次，對於建構主義的內部差異或是學者對建構主義的分類，未能理解這皆是依學者分類基準與研究旨趣而來。建構主義本身「絕對」不是一種知識論的絕對主義，它是歡迎更多的討論。 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Mr. Huang has misunderstood and misinterpreted my views as well as those of some other scholars which I cited. Huang`s comments are focused on the categorization of constructivism. What is constructivism? Agreeing on a clear definition is difficult, yet scholars agree upon characteristics or tenets to describe this phenomenon. Meanwhile, the typology of constructivism is based on the scholar`s research purpose. I am against any absoluteness, even Wendt`s; he is not and should not be the flag bearer of orthodox constructivism. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 439157 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 問題與研究, 39(11), 95-101 | - |
| dc.title (題名) | 治絲愈棼的國際關係理論研究對黃旻華先生的評論之回應 | - |
| dc.title (題名) | A Reply to Huang`s Comment | - |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | - |
