學術產出-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 鑿開霸權:普世主義與相對主義之外關於“民主”的知識
Opening Hegemony: Democratic Knowledge Production beyond Universalism and Relativism
作者 石之瑜
Shih, Chih-Yu
貢獻者 中國大陸研究
關鍵詞 新左派;自由主義;中國民主化;台灣;普世主義;相對主義
new left ; liberalism ; Chinese democracy ; Taiwan ; universalism ; relativism
日期 2001-03
上傳時間 2-May-2019 10:50:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 當前關於中國民主化的種種預設,是對中國民主化進行研究的知識產物,不存在於知識體系之外。但對這個研究議程既有的一些抗拒,則因為掉進了普世主義與相對主義的對比,也成為一種具有封閉傾向的知識霸權。本文提出一個「鑿開」的知識論,認為民主的意義,在於突破文化霸權,所謂民主知識,就是發掘成形中的文化霸權,並保留所有鑿開可能性的論述,這個論述將研究對象當作為知識的來源,並在論述上為他們開創各種潛在意義的空間,即使是過分解讀也不妨,因為愈寬廣的意義空間與愈複雜的可能形式,愈能防止霸權的鞏固,厥為民主知識。民主知識不是實驗得來的,而是在地實證的;不是以公共領域的壟斷性為前提的,而是突破壟斷性的;不是研究者發現後才存在的,而是實際的人實踐出來的;不是亙古不變的,而是隨時流動沒有固定形式的;不是不證自明的,而是要透過層層詮釋辯證的。
Contemporary studies of Chinese democracy are epistemologically hegemonic in that they close off the possibility of reinterpreting the meaning of democracy. The discussion of this paper moves beyond democracy in institutional, value, and personality terms. Instead, it explores the possibility of seeing democracy as an epistemological tool of opening cultural hegemonies. The practice of epistemological democracy depends on the reading and re-reading of on-going practices in people’s life experiences. Democracy is preserved to the extent that scholars are always able to read into practices meanings that are outside of any existent or emerging hegemonies. From this perspective, this paper is also a critique of writings by both liberals and new leftists in the current cultural debates.
關聯 中國大陸研究, 44(3), 1-15
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 中國大陸研究-
dc.creator (作者) 石之瑜-
dc.creator (作者) Shih, Chih-Yu-
dc.date (日期) 2001-03-
dc.date.accessioned 2-May-2019 10:50:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-May-2019 10:50:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-May-2019 10:50:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123182-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 當前關於中國民主化的種種預設,是對中國民主化進行研究的知識產物,不存在於知識體系之外。但對這個研究議程既有的一些抗拒,則因為掉進了普世主義與相對主義的對比,也成為一種具有封閉傾向的知識霸權。本文提出一個「鑿開」的知識論,認為民主的意義,在於突破文化霸權,所謂民主知識,就是發掘成形中的文化霸權,並保留所有鑿開可能性的論述,這個論述將研究對象當作為知識的來源,並在論述上為他們開創各種潛在意義的空間,即使是過分解讀也不妨,因為愈寬廣的意義空間與愈複雜的可能形式,愈能防止霸權的鞏固,厥為民主知識。民主知識不是實驗得來的,而是在地實證的;不是以公共領域的壟斷性為前提的,而是突破壟斷性的;不是研究者發現後才存在的,而是實際的人實踐出來的;不是亙古不變的,而是隨時流動沒有固定形式的;不是不證自明的,而是要透過層層詮釋辯證的。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Contemporary studies of Chinese democracy are epistemologically hegemonic in that they close off the possibility of reinterpreting the meaning of democracy. The discussion of this paper moves beyond democracy in institutional, value, and personality terms. Instead, it explores the possibility of seeing democracy as an epistemological tool of opening cultural hegemonies. The practice of epistemological democracy depends on the reading and re-reading of on-going practices in people’s life experiences. Democracy is preserved to the extent that scholars are always able to read into practices meanings that are outside of any existent or emerging hegemonies. From this perspective, this paper is also a critique of writings by both liberals and new leftists in the current cultural debates.-
dc.format.extent 1161553 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 中國大陸研究, 44(3), 1-15-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新左派;自由主義;中國民主化;台灣;普世主義;相對主義-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) new left ; liberalism ; Chinese democracy ; Taiwan ; universalism ; relativism-
dc.title (題名) 鑿開霸權:普世主義與相對主義之外關於“民主”的知識-
dc.title (題名) Opening Hegemony: Democratic Knowledge Production beyond Universalism and Relativism-
dc.type (資料類型) article-