Publications-Journal articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 日本語の「依頼使役文」の非対格性検証能力-テモラウ構文の統語的制約-
日語依賴使役句的非對格檢驗性--依賴使役句的構文限制--
The Verification of Unaccusativity through the Request-Causative Construction in Japanese--The Syntactic Restriction on the-temorau Construction
作者 吉田妙子
Yoshida,Taeko
關鍵詞 非對格動詞 ; 依賴使役句 ; Temorau構文 ; 恩惠表現 ; 被害表現 ; 有生命名詞組 ; 無生命名詞組 ; 二格名詞組 ; Tewa構文 ; 願望表現
Unaccusative verb ; The request-causative construction ; The-temorau construction ; Benefactive ; Adversative ; ±animated ; Ni-marked NP ; -tewa construction ; Subjunctive
日期 2004-01
上傳時間 8-Dec-2008 11:26:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 為了證明動詞的非對格性,學者們提出了各種的檢驗方法。影山(1996)針對「N ni V shitemorau」依賴使役句(temorau構文)的V(動詞)部分,指摘出非對格動詞無法出現在依賴使役句中,提出了「依賴使役句的檢驗法」。但是,影山所主張的「依賴使役句的檢驗法」,筆者認為有下列2個問題點。\\r
     1. 誠如竹林(1998)等學者的指摘,依賴使役句中動作的主事者(N)若為有生命名詞組時,V即使是非對格動詞也能出現在依賴使役句中。
     2. 依賴使役句除了可表示恩惠外,在「tewa構文」中也可以表示被害。
     此外,高見‧久野(2002)的論文中全面否定影山的主張,指摘出「依賴使役句中動作的主事者(N)若為無生命名詞組時,V即使是非對格動詞也能出現在依賴使役句中」,但筆者認為高見‧久野的主張也必須稍作修改。因為,高見‧久野的論文中所列舉的例句,全都是表示假定願望的從屬子句,且表示假定願望表現的句中可出現各種從屬子句。\\r
     基於上述理由,筆者認為無法用動詞的非對格性檢驗日語的依賴使役句。
The unaccusativity of verbs has been argued for years in kinds of ways to verify. Kageyama(1996) suggests that in ‘-temorau’ construction; i.e., N ni V shiteimorau, no unaccusative verb ever appear in terms of his original test on the request-causative construction. Yet there remains some insufficiency, which I shall argue through the two following points.
     (1) As Takebayashi(1998) pointed, the unaccusative verb may appear in the ‘-temorau’ construction if the embedded actor NP is [+animated].
     (2) ‘-Temorau’ Construction can be benefactive also adversative as well.
     There is also an argument set out by Takami & Kuno(2002) in which the unaccusative verb may exist even if the embedded actor NP is [-animated], which apparently stands against Kageyama’s viewpoints. I assume that the argument needs to be revised because all the embedded actor NPs in ‘-temorau’ construction appear in subjunctive clauses that many kinds of constructions beyond ‘-temorau’ can be embedded.
     We may conclude, therefore, the verification of the request-causative construction is invalid to verify the unaccusativity of verbs.
關聯 政大日本研究, 1, 121-147
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 吉田妙子zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yoshida,Taeko-
dc.date (日期) 2004-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2008 11:26:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2008 11:26:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2008 11:26:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/13237-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 為了證明動詞的非對格性,學者們提出了各種的檢驗方法。影山(1996)針對「N ni V shitemorau」依賴使役句(temorau構文)的V(動詞)部分,指摘出非對格動詞無法出現在依賴使役句中,提出了「依賴使役句的檢驗法」。但是,影山所主張的「依賴使役句的檢驗法」,筆者認為有下列2個問題點。\\r
     1. 誠如竹林(1998)等學者的指摘,依賴使役句中動作的主事者(N)若為有生命名詞組時,V即使是非對格動詞也能出現在依賴使役句中。
     2. 依賴使役句除了可表示恩惠外,在「tewa構文」中也可以表示被害。
     此外,高見‧久野(2002)的論文中全面否定影山的主張,指摘出「依賴使役句中動作的主事者(N)若為無生命名詞組時,V即使是非對格動詞也能出現在依賴使役句中」,但筆者認為高見‧久野的主張也必須稍作修改。因為,高見‧久野的論文中所列舉的例句,全都是表示假定願望的從屬子句,且表示假定願望表現的句中可出現各種從屬子句。\\r
     基於上述理由,筆者認為無法用動詞的非對格性檢驗日語的依賴使役句。
-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The unaccusativity of verbs has been argued for years in kinds of ways to verify. Kageyama(1996) suggests that in ‘-temorau’ construction; i.e., N ni V shiteimorau, no unaccusative verb ever appear in terms of his original test on the request-causative construction. Yet there remains some insufficiency, which I shall argue through the two following points.
     (1) As Takebayashi(1998) pointed, the unaccusative verb may appear in the ‘-temorau’ construction if the embedded actor NP is [+animated].
     (2) ‘-Temorau’ Construction can be benefactive also adversative as well.
     There is also an argument set out by Takami & Kuno(2002) in which the unaccusative verb may exist even if the embedded actor NP is [-animated], which apparently stands against Kageyama’s viewpoints. I assume that the argument needs to be revised because all the embedded actor NPs in ‘-temorau’ construction appear in subjunctive clauses that many kinds of constructions beyond ‘-temorau’ can be embedded.
     We may conclude, therefore, the verification of the request-causative construction is invalid to verify the unaccusativity of verbs.
-
dc.format application/en_US
dc.language jpen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 政大日本研究, 1, 121-147en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非對格動詞 ; 依賴使役句 ; Temorau構文 ; 恩惠表現 ; 被害表現 ; 有生命名詞組 ; 無生命名詞組 ; 二格名詞組 ; Tewa構文 ; 願望表現-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Unaccusative verb ; The request-causative construction ; The-temorau construction ; Benefactive ; Adversative ; ±animated ; Ni-marked NP ; -tewa construction ; Subjunctive-
dc.title (題名) 日本語の「依頼使役文」の非対格性検証能力-テモラウ構文の統語的制約-ja_JP
dc.title (題名) 日語依賴使役句的非對格檢驗性--依賴使役句的構文限制--zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Verification of Unaccusativity through the Request-Causative Construction in Japanese--The Syntactic Restriction on the-temorau Constructionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen