學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 個人特性與LinkedIn使用動機及行為關聯性研究
A study of relationships among individual characteristics, motivation and behavior of using LinkedIn.作者 陳寶如 貢獻者 黃家齊
陳寶如關鍵詞 LinkedIn
社群網絡平台
個人特性
使用行為
使用動機
LinkedIn
Social Network Site
Personal characteristics
Usage behavior
Usage motivation日期 2019 上傳時間 1-七月-2019 11:12:20 (UTC+8) 摘要 社群網絡平台（Social Network Sites, SNS）提供給人們一個更廣泛的溝通方式。以LinkedIn為例，不僅滿足原有的社交目的，還能透過人脈連結的方式拓展商務。目前在國內關於LinkedIn使用的研究並不普遍，期許透過本研究，為日後學術研究開啟新的篇章。參考國內外社群網絡平台的相關文獻，以使用者特性（含人格特性、職務類別與人口統計變項）、網站使用行為（Facebook使用行為與104人力銀行使用行為）、LinkedIn使用動機與行為作為研究主軸。並以文獻資料與推論建立H1~H8假設，期望藉由問卷的分析結果來驗證其正確性。最後共回收150份有效問卷，以層級迴歸進行分析。結果發現：一、使用者「使用LinkedIn年資」與「好友連結數量」有正向關聯性；二、在使用動機與使用行為中，「關注特定產業與公司資訊」動機與大多數LinkedIn使用行為存有關聯性。其餘在特定動機下也存有關聯性的行為：如「求職」動機與「求職與投遞履歷」行為、「社交」動機與「主動人脈連結」、「留言與回覆」行為；三、透過與LinkedIn相似的網站使用行為（104、Facebook）變項得知「個人資料更新」行為與Facebook使用行為呈負向關係、與104使用行為上呈現正向關係。透過分析資料顯示，台灣與國外在LinkedIn使用功能上也不盡相同。目前台灣使用者較多用於資訊的獲取，且在社團功能使用上較不活躍。在業務功能的使用上，大多是人力資源者用於招聘，其他職務類別的使用者較少將LinkedIn作為B2B商務開發工具。綜上，本研究在台灣LinkedIn使用者之個人特性、使用行為及使用動機上填補過去對相關議題探討之不足。
There are variable social network cites which provide a wider range of communication methods for people. Take LinkedIn as an example, it not only meets the social needs, but also explores business opportunity through the connections.Based on the previous research and literature, the conceptual framework consists of user characteristics, website usage behavior, LinkedIn usage motivation and behavior. And hypothesis H1~H8 are established by the relevant study as mention above. Then, we carry out hypothesis testing by questionnaire method.A total of 150 valid questionnaires were collected and it shows that 1) “The years of using LinkedIn” has a positive relationship with the “Number of connection”. 2) There are some findings related with motivation and behavior such as "Focus on industry and company information" motivation and "Browsing" behavior；"Job-seeking" motivation and "Job-seeking and resume delivery" behavior；"Social" motivation and "Friend connecting" and "Message and Reply" behavior. 3) The "Personal data updating" behavior has negative relationship with Facebook usage behavior, and has positive relationship with 104 human bank usage behavior.We found there exists differences between Taiwan and foreign countries. Taiwanese users tend to take LinkedIn as information acquisition and less usage of community functions. Besides, most of the human resources take it for the recruitment process. However, the users of other job categories seldom take it as a business development tool like foreign country.Our findings make up for the deficiencies about personal characteristics, usage behavior and motivation of LinkedIn usage in the past.參考文獻 (1)網站資料Duggan, M (2013). Photo and video sharing grow online. Retrieved June 8, 2018, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/28/photo-and-video-sharing-grow-online/.Jamie (2018).60+ Social Networking Sites You Need to Know About in 2018.Retrieved August 15, 2018, from https://makeawebsitehub.com/social-media-sites/.Kevin Gallagher(2018).社群網站的統計報告：熱門平台的使用者年齡、性別和收入差異。數位基地。民108年4月15日，取自https://gd.taiwantrade.com/news/369陳品先（2011）。有錢網友和一般人不一樣，他們的社群媒體使用行為如何？數位時代。民108年5月1日，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/18384/BN-ARTICLE-18384詹峻揚（2016）。6 度分隔落伍了，臉書上的朋友只有 3.57 度分隔而已！數位時代。民108年6月10日，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/38679/BN-2016-02-06-151649-77張世明（2016）。為何大部分的東方人不使用LinkedIn。104職涯社群。民108年6月5日，取自https://plus.104.com.tw/activity/b2aa8878-2296-4575-bc5d-8e63e02dde10LinkedIn：商務社群開發利器，開發你的海外B2B事業（民107年11月30日）。內容行銷高峰會。民108年5月1日，取自https://contentmarketing.vip/how-to-use-linkedin-for-b2b-marketing/LinkedIn介紹：不只找工作，還是海外B2B行銷利器（無日期）。Transbiz。民108年5月1日，取自https://transbiz.com.tw/linkedin-%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9-b2b-marketing/創市際調查報告：社群網站的使用行為（無日期）。創市際。民107年8月15日，取自https://rocket.cafe/talks/78006網路如何滲透你的生活，Web 4.0的時代即將來臨（民105年3月1日）。允騰網路行銷有限公司。民107年8月15日，取自https://www.icisco.cc/blog/web4-0/網路求職網友使用行為：創市際調查報告（無日期）。創市際。民107年8月15日，取自https://rocket.cafe/talks/78663(2)中文部分Hank Chin & Spencer Chang （2018）。我用LinkedIn 找到高薪國外工作（第一版）（秦浤傑、張哲勳譯）。台北市：上奇時代。（原著出版年：2016）李元章（2008）。線上人力銀行成功關鍵因素探討。T&D飛訊，70，1-22。吳欣純、周倩（2012）。社群網站使用者使用動機、資訊驗證態度、資訊可信度感知與資訊分享行為之研究－以 Facebook 網站為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。唐俊昌（2013）。專業網絡中個人檔案與人脈形成之關聯性－以LinkedIn為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。張春興（2007）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐（重修二版）。台北：東華出版社陳佳雯、陸洛、許雅玉 （2012）。工作要求、工作資源與員工工作態度之關聯：以勤勉審慎性及主動性人格為調節變項。人力資源管理學報，12（1），23-49。紹芳雯（2017）。社群招募平台LinkedIn跟104人力銀行的商業模式和策略探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣大學，台北市。黃聖峯、鄒仁淳、林娟娟 （2014）。社群網站之使用行為研究-以 Facebook 為例。Electronic Commerce Studies，12（2），201-234。黃蘭鍈、陳憶菁（2012)）。 社交網絡服務網站的使用者動機與負面評論之研究－以 Facebook 為例。2012第15屆科技整合管理研討會。國家發展委員會（2017）。106個人家戶數位機會調查報告。鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜（2011）。" International English Big-Five Mini-Markers" 之繁體中文版量表發展。管理學報， 28（6），579-615。(3)英文部分Alhabash, S., Park, H., Kononova, A., Chiang, Y.-h., & Wise, K. (2012). Exploring the motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 304-311.Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues, T., Cha, M., & Almeida, V. (2012). Characterizing UserNavigation and Interactions in Online Social Networks. Information Sciences, 195, 1-24.Bhardwaj, S., Atrey, P. K., Saini, M. K., & El Saddik, A. (2016). Personality assessment using multiple online social networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(21), 13237-13269.Brocke, J. V., Richter, D., & Riemer, K. (2009). Motives of using social network sites (SNSs) - An analysis of SNS adoption among students. Proceedings of the 22nd Bled eConference eEnablement: Facilitating an Open, Effective and Representative eSociety, Bled, SloveniaBoyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2010). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 3(38), 16-31.Chen, H. (2012). Relationship between Motivation and Behavior of SNS User. JSW, 7(6), 1265-1272.Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665.Dietel, J.-E. (2017). They do! How the explicit motive-structure predicts user behavior in (business-) social network sites like Xing or LinkedIn. Computing, 99(5), 537-550.Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. AMCIS 2007 proceedings, 339.Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M. L., & Lester, D. (2007). Shyness, Internet use, and personality. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(5), 713-716.Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.Faff, R. W., Lay, J., & Smith, M. (2017). PoW! Using social media to leverage research visibility–‘Pitch of the Week’posts in LinkedIn.Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In Social networks (pp. 347-367): Elsevier.Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A.-M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98.Hsu, C. W. (Julia) (2007). Staging on the Internet: Research on online photo album users in Taiwan with the spectacle/performance paradigm. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 596-600.Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.Ko, H., Cho, C. H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 57-70.Liu, D., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). The Big Five personality traits, Big Two metatraits and social media: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 229-240.Loiacono, E., Carey, D., Misch, A., Spencer, A., & Speranza, R. (2012). Personality impacts on self-disclosure behavior on social networking sites.Maria Balmaceda, J., Schiaffino, S., & Godoy, D. (2014). How do personality traits affect communication among users in online social networks? Online Information Review, 38(1), 136-153.M. M. Plummer and S. R. Hiltz, “Recruitment in Social Networking Sites: A Theoretical Model of Jobseekers’ Intentions,” in AMCIS ’09 Proc., 2009, paper 176Mitchell, T. R. and Daniels, D., 2003. Motivation, in Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R. and Klimoski, R.J.(Eds.), Handbook of psychology, New York, NY: Wiley & Sons Inc, 225-254.Nadkarni, A. and Hofmann, S.G. (2012), ‘Why do people use Facebook?’, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 243-249.Nikolaou, I. (2014). Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 179-189.Offenberger, Brian, CeM, CSMA.SDM., Troy (2018). 5 Steps for Finding & Hiring Great Sales Reps.48(2), 38.Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Ross, C., Simmering, M. G., Arseneault, J. M., Orr, R. R. J. C., & Behavior. (2009). The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. 12(3), 337-340.Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in human behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664.Saef, R., Woo, S. E., Carpenter, J., & Tay, L. (2018). Fostering socio-informational behaviors online: The interactive effect of openness to experience and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 93-98.Sheldon, P. (2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39-53.Shi, Y., Yue, X., & He, J. (2013). Understanding social network sites (SNSs) preferences: personality, motivation, and happiness matters. Paper presented at the International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing.Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (2001). Identifying motivations for the use of commercial web sites. Information Resources Management Journal, 14(1), 22-30.Strehlke, C. (2010). Social network sites: A starting point for career development practitioners. Journal of Employment Counseling, 47(1), 38-48.Taylor, A., Sluckin, W., Davies, D.R., Reason, J.T., Thomson, R. and Colman, A,M. (1982). Introducing Psychology. Harmondsworth:Penguin.Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory.Urista, M. A., Qingwen, D., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215-229.Wang, J.-L., Jackson, L. A., Wang, H.-Z., & Gaskin, J. (2015). Predicting social networking site (SNS) use: Personality, attitudes, motivation and internet self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 119-124. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
106363027資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106363027 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃家齊 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳寶如 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 陳寶如 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-七月-2019 11:12:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-七月-2019 11:12:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-七月-2019 11:12:20 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0106363027 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124257 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106363027 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 社群網絡平台（Social Network Sites, SNS）提供給人們一個更廣泛的溝通方式。以LinkedIn為例，不僅滿足原有的社交目的，還能透過人脈連結的方式拓展商務。目前在國內關於LinkedIn使用的研究並不普遍，期許透過本研究，為日後學術研究開啟新的篇章。參考國內外社群網絡平台的相關文獻，以使用者特性（含人格特性、職務類別與人口統計變項）、網站使用行為（Facebook使用行為與104人力銀行使用行為）、LinkedIn使用動機與行為作為研究主軸。並以文獻資料與推論建立H1~H8假設，期望藉由問卷的分析結果來驗證其正確性。最後共回收150份有效問卷，以層級迴歸進行分析。結果發現：一、使用者「使用LinkedIn年資」與「好友連結數量」有正向關聯性；二、在使用動機與使用行為中，「關注特定產業與公司資訊」動機與大多數LinkedIn使用行為存有關聯性。其餘在特定動機下也存有關聯性的行為：如「求職」動機與「求職與投遞履歷」行為、「社交」動機與「主動人脈連結」、「留言與回覆」行為；三、透過與LinkedIn相似的網站使用行為（104、Facebook）變項得知「個人資料更新」行為與Facebook使用行為呈負向關係、與104使用行為上呈現正向關係。透過分析資料顯示，台灣與國外在LinkedIn使用功能上也不盡相同。目前台灣使用者較多用於資訊的獲取，且在社團功能使用上較不活躍。在業務功能的使用上，大多是人力資源者用於招聘，其他職務類別的使用者較少將LinkedIn作為B2B商務開發工具。綜上，本研究在台灣LinkedIn使用者之個人特性、使用行為及使用動機上填補過去對相關議題探討之不足。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) There are variable social network cites which provide a wider range of communication methods for people. Take LinkedIn as an example, it not only meets the social needs, but also explores business opportunity through the connections.Based on the previous research and literature, the conceptual framework consists of user characteristics, website usage behavior, LinkedIn usage motivation and behavior. And hypothesis H1~H8 are established by the relevant study as mention above. Then, we carry out hypothesis testing by questionnaire method.A total of 150 valid questionnaires were collected and it shows that 1) “The years of using LinkedIn” has a positive relationship with the “Number of connection”. 2) There are some findings related with motivation and behavior such as "Focus on industry and company information" motivation and "Browsing" behavior；"Job-seeking" motivation and "Job-seeking and resume delivery" behavior；"Social" motivation and "Friend connecting" and "Message and Reply" behavior. 3) The "Personal data updating" behavior has negative relationship with Facebook usage behavior, and has positive relationship with 104 human bank usage behavior.We found there exists differences between Taiwan and foreign countries. Taiwanese users tend to take LinkedIn as information acquisition and less usage of community functions. Besides, most of the human resources take it for the recruitment process. However, the users of other job categories seldom take it as a business development tool like foreign country.Our findings make up for the deficiencies about personal characteristics, usage behavior and motivation of LinkedIn usage in the past. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 4第三節 研究流程 5第四節 預期研究貢獻 6第二章 文獻探討與推論假設 7第一節 社群網路平台 7第二節 LinkedIn使用動機 11第三節 個人特性與LinkedIn使用動機之關係 15第四節 使用行為 20第五節 個人特性與LinkedIn使用行為之關係 24第六節 LinkedIn使用動機與LinkedIn使用行為之關係 26第七節 網站使用行為與LinkedIn使用行為之關係 27第三章 研究方法 29第一節 研究架構 29第二節 抽樣方法分析 31第三節 變項定義與衡量方法 33第四節 資料分析方法 38第四章 研究結果 40第一節 相關性分析 40第二節 研究假設驗證 43第三節 研究假設驗證結果 56第五章 討論與建議 57第一節 研究結果討論與建議 57第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 63參考文獻 65附錄 研究問卷 73 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106363027 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) LinkedIn zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社群網絡平台 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 個人特性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用動機 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) LinkedIn en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Network Site en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Personal characteristics en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Usage behavior en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Usage motivation en_US dc.title (題名) 個人特性與LinkedIn使用動機及行為關聯性研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A study of relationships among individual characteristics, motivation and behavior of using LinkedIn. en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1)網站資料Duggan, M (2013). Photo and video sharing grow online. Retrieved June 8, 2018, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/28/photo-and-video-sharing-grow-online/.Jamie (2018).60+ Social Networking Sites You Need to Know About in 2018.Retrieved August 15, 2018, from https://makeawebsitehub.com/social-media-sites/.Kevin Gallagher(2018).社群網站的統計報告：熱門平台的使用者年齡、性別和收入差異。數位基地。民108年4月15日，取自https://gd.taiwantrade.com/news/369陳品先（2011）。有錢網友和一般人不一樣，他們的社群媒體使用行為如何？數位時代。民108年5月1日，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/18384/BN-ARTICLE-18384詹峻揚（2016）。6 度分隔落伍了，臉書上的朋友只有 3.57 度分隔而已！數位時代。民108年6月10日，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/38679/BN-2016-02-06-151649-77張世明（2016）。為何大部分的東方人不使用LinkedIn。104職涯社群。民108年6月5日，取自https://plus.104.com.tw/activity/b2aa8878-2296-4575-bc5d-8e63e02dde10LinkedIn：商務社群開發利器，開發你的海外B2B事業（民107年11月30日）。內容行銷高峰會。民108年5月1日，取自https://contentmarketing.vip/how-to-use-linkedin-for-b2b-marketing/LinkedIn介紹：不只找工作，還是海外B2B行銷利器（無日期）。Transbiz。民108年5月1日，取自https://transbiz.com.tw/linkedin-%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9-b2b-marketing/創市際調查報告：社群網站的使用行為（無日期）。創市際。民107年8月15日，取自https://rocket.cafe/talks/78006網路如何滲透你的生活，Web 4.0的時代即將來臨（民105年3月1日）。允騰網路行銷有限公司。民107年8月15日，取自https://www.icisco.cc/blog/web4-0/網路求職網友使用行為：創市際調查報告（無日期）。創市際。民107年8月15日，取自https://rocket.cafe/talks/78663(2)中文部分Hank Chin & Spencer Chang （2018）。我用LinkedIn 找到高薪國外工作（第一版）（秦浤傑、張哲勳譯）。台北市：上奇時代。（原著出版年：2016）李元章（2008）。線上人力銀行成功關鍵因素探討。T&D飛訊，70，1-22。吳欣純、周倩（2012）。社群網站使用者使用動機、資訊驗證態度、資訊可信度感知與資訊分享行為之研究－以 Facebook 網站為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。唐俊昌（2013）。專業網絡中個人檔案與人脈形成之關聯性－以LinkedIn為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。張春興（2007）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐（重修二版）。台北：東華出版社陳佳雯、陸洛、許雅玉 （2012）。工作要求、工作資源與員工工作態度之關聯：以勤勉審慎性及主動性人格為調節變項。人力資源管理學報，12（1），23-49。紹芳雯（2017）。社群招募平台LinkedIn跟104人力銀行的商業模式和策略探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣大學，台北市。黃聖峯、鄒仁淳、林娟娟 （2014）。社群網站之使用行為研究-以 Facebook 為例。Electronic Commerce Studies，12（2），201-234。黃蘭鍈、陳憶菁（2012)）。 社交網絡服務網站的使用者動機與負面評論之研究－以 Facebook 為例。2012第15屆科技整合管理研討會。國家發展委員會（2017）。106個人家戶數位機會調查報告。鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜（2011）。" International English Big-Five Mini-Markers" 之繁體中文版量表發展。管理學報， 28（6），579-615。(3)英文部分Alhabash, S., Park, H., Kononova, A., Chiang, Y.-h., & Wise, K. (2012). Exploring the motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 304-311.Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues, T., Cha, M., & Almeida, V. (2012). Characterizing UserNavigation and Interactions in Online Social Networks. Information Sciences, 195, 1-24.Bhardwaj, S., Atrey, P. K., Saini, M. K., & El Saddik, A. (2016). Personality assessment using multiple online social networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(21), 13237-13269.Brocke, J. V., Richter, D., & Riemer, K. (2009). Motives of using social network sites (SNSs) - An analysis of SNS adoption among students. Proceedings of the 22nd Bled eConference eEnablement: Facilitating an Open, Effective and Representative eSociety, Bled, SloveniaBoyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2010). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 3(38), 16-31.Chen, H. (2012). Relationship between Motivation and Behavior of SNS User. JSW, 7(6), 1265-1272.Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665.Dietel, J.-E. (2017). They do! How the explicit motive-structure predicts user behavior in (business-) social network sites like Xing or LinkedIn. Computing, 99(5), 537-550.Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. AMCIS 2007 proceedings, 339.Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M. L., & Lester, D. (2007). Shyness, Internet use, and personality. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(5), 713-716.Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.Faff, R. W., Lay, J., & Smith, M. (2017). PoW! Using social media to leverage research visibility–‘Pitch of the Week’posts in LinkedIn.Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In Social networks (pp. 347-367): Elsevier.Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A.-M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98.Hsu, C. W. (Julia) (2007). Staging on the Internet: Research on online photo album users in Taiwan with the spectacle/performance paradigm. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 596-600.Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.Ko, H., Cho, C. H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 57-70.Liu, D., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). The Big Five personality traits, Big Two metatraits and social media: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 229-240.Loiacono, E., Carey, D., Misch, A., Spencer, A., & Speranza, R. (2012). Personality impacts on self-disclosure behavior on social networking sites.Maria Balmaceda, J., Schiaffino, S., & Godoy, D. (2014). How do personality traits affect communication among users in online social networks? Online Information Review, 38(1), 136-153.M. M. Plummer and S. R. Hiltz, “Recruitment in Social Networking Sites: A Theoretical Model of Jobseekers’ Intentions,” in AMCIS ’09 Proc., 2009, paper 176Mitchell, T. R. and Daniels, D., 2003. Motivation, in Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R. and Klimoski, R.J.(Eds.), Handbook of psychology, New York, NY: Wiley & Sons Inc, 225-254.Nadkarni, A. and Hofmann, S.G. (2012), ‘Why do people use Facebook?’, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 243-249.Nikolaou, I. (2014). Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 179-189.Offenberger, Brian, CeM, CSMA.SDM., Troy (2018). 5 Steps for Finding & Hiring Great Sales Reps.48(2), 38.Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Ross, C., Simmering, M. G., Arseneault, J. M., Orr, R. R. J. C., & Behavior. (2009). The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. 12(3), 337-340.Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in human behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664.Saef, R., Woo, S. E., Carpenter, J., & Tay, L. (2018). Fostering socio-informational behaviors online: The interactive effect of openness to experience and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 93-98.Sheldon, P. (2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39-53.Shi, Y., Yue, X., & He, J. (2013). Understanding social network sites (SNSs) preferences: personality, motivation, and happiness matters. Paper presented at the International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing.Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (2001). Identifying motivations for the use of commercial web sites. Information Resources Management Journal, 14(1), 22-30.Strehlke, C. (2010). Social network sites: A starting point for career development practitioners. Journal of Employment Counseling, 47(1), 38-48.Taylor, A., Sluckin, W., Davies, D.R., Reason, J.T., Thomson, R. and Colman, A,M. (1982). Introducing Psychology. Harmondsworth:Penguin.Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory.Urista, M. A., Qingwen, D., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215-229.Wang, J.-L., Jackson, L. A., Wang, H.-Z., & Gaskin, J. (2015). Predicting social networking site (SNS) use: Personality, attitudes, motivation and internet self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 119-124. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900020 en_US
