Publications-Books & Chapters in Books

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

TitleSeeking Common Ground While Keeping Differences: Using the Case of the Cross-Strait Relations as A Case
Creator吳崇涵
Wu, Charles Chong-Han
Contributor外交系
Date2014-10
Date Issued2-Aug-2019 16:07:35 (UTC+8)
SummaryFor the past decade, the “joint democracy produces peace” theory has received substantial attention. Evidence has confirmed that democracies rarely, if ever, engage in large-scale conflicts with each other. However, there is a lack of specific information regarding the mixed dyads (democracies and non-democracies), especially when we attempt to study their peace scenarios. Hence, some other international relations scholars proclaim that even though the political structures may be different between democracies and non-democracies, sharing similar interests provide certain strong incentives for states to behave peacefully. Regime types may be influential, but under the mixed dyads scenario, states’ vital interests have surpassed the importance of regime similarity. It is an interesting question as to whether we can apply this theoretical framework to the situation between China and Taiwan. Since these two political entities belong to two different regimes, and mainland China has no such intention to become a more democratic regime, it seems that we are able to use the same structure of interest similarity to explain the current cross-Strait scenario.
RelationMaryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, University of Maryland School of Law
Typebook
dc.contributor 外交系-
dc.creator (作者) 吳崇涵-
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Charles Chong-Han-
dc.date (日期) 2014-10-
dc.date.accessioned 2-Aug-2019 16:07:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Aug-2019 16:07:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Aug-2019 16:07:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124577-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) For the past decade, the “joint democracy produces peace” theory has received substantial attention. Evidence has confirmed that democracies rarely, if ever, engage in large-scale conflicts with each other. However, there is a lack of specific information regarding the mixed dyads (democracies and non-democracies), especially when we attempt to study their peace scenarios. Hence, some other international relations scholars proclaim that even though the political structures may be different between democracies and non-democracies, sharing similar interests provide certain strong incentives for states to behave peacefully. Regime types may be influential, but under the mixed dyads scenario, states’ vital interests have surpassed the importance of regime similarity. It is an interesting question as to whether we can apply this theoretical framework to the situation between China and Taiwan. Since these two political entities belong to two different regimes, and mainland China has no such intention to become a more democratic regime, it seems that we are able to use the same structure of interest similarity to explain the current cross-Strait scenario.-
dc.format.extent 290765 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, University of Maryland School of Law-
dc.title (題名) Seeking Common Ground While Keeping Differences: Using the Case of the Cross-Strait Relations as A Case-
dc.type (資料類型) book-