1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 外國語文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 莎士比亞《暴風雨》中的同情與能力
Compassion and Competence in Shakespeare’s The Tempest
作者 葉怡君
Yeh, Yi-Chun
貢獻者 施堂模
Sellari, Thomas
葉怡君
Yeh, Yi-Chun
關鍵詞 暴風雨
莎士比亞
魔法
同情
The Tempest
Shakespeare
magic
compassion
日期 2019
上傳時間 7-八月-2019 15:42:35 (UTC+8)
摘要 此篇論文藉由討論莎士比亞《暴風雨》中，以同情(compassion)與能力(competence)為核心的議題，給予劇中主角普洛斯彼羅(Prospero)一個更為公平合理的詮釋。雖然在劇裡擁有魔法與政治權力看似掌握一切，這些力量應該被良善的意圖管束。普羅斯彼羅能夠在同情心的管束下使用自己的能力，也藉此展現了成為一位好君主的本質。
本文第一章為文獻回顧，整理了過往對普羅斯彼羅的評論，以及談論《暴風雨》中，普羅斯彼羅的魔法之相關研究。第二章以介紹文藝復興及其前期的魔法作為開頭，更進一步探討當時魔法與當權者的細密關聯。本章接著分析《暴風雨》中魔法與政治權力的相似性，以及兩者共有的限制。
接續第二章的討論，第三章介紹了《暴風雨》中的同情心，並詳加敘述同情心在劇中如何被詮釋、於普羅斯彼羅的關聯性，以及在談論使用能力時，同情心的重要性。
第四章更詳細地探討同情心與能力之間的關聯，並解釋本篇論文的核心論點：能力必須在同情心的管束下使用。本章並援引伊拉斯謨斯(Erasmus)對於仁君的教導支持此論點，說明良善的意圖才是能使國家持續壯大的本源。
第五章綜合前述，重新檢視過往的論述，並在本文提出的論點下提出可修正之處，也給了普羅斯彼羅一個更公正的詮釋。
This thesis aims to provide a more justifiable interpretation of Prospero by bringing the issue of compassion and competence into discussion. The thesis proposes that powerful as they are, magical and political powers should be guided under a good intention. When demonstrating his competence under the guidance of compassion, Prospero achieves the essence of a good duke.

The thesis first gives a brief review of former approaches in viewing Prospero, and further brings out the issue of magic in the play that has appeared in past criticism. The second chapter introduces magic in Shakespeare’s time and the tight connection between magic and the authority. This chapter later provides a detailed analysis of political power and Prospero’s magic, which are defined as competence in the thesis. This chapter points out the similarities shared by these two powers and also their limitations. Continuing the discussion of the second chapter, the third chapter discusses how compassion is portrayed in the play, how it is related to Prospero, and the significance it possesses when being related to powers. Compassion and competence are brought together in the fourth chapter, which proposes that the later should be governed under the former. The argument is further strengthened by Erasmus’ concerns of a good sovereign. The last chapter brings new perspectives from the former approaches in seeing Prospero, and thus renders a more justifiable position in understanding this powerful magician.
參考文獻 Works Cited

Bacon, Francis. Essays. Edited by John Pitcher. Penguin Books, 1985.
Bloom, Harold. Modern Critical Interpretation of William Shakespeare`s The
Tempest. Chelsea House Publishers, 1988.
Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Edited by Holbrook Jackson.
The New York Review of Books, 2001.
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Great Books of the Western
World, Vol.20, Encyclopædia Britannica, 1990.
The Cambridge history of English and American literature an encyclopedia in
eighteen volumes. New York: Bartleby.com, 2000. Web.
Egan, Robert. “This Rough Magic: Perspectives of Art and Morality in The
Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2 (Spring, 1972), pp. 171-182.
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Education of a Christian Prince. Edited by Lisa Jardine. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Frey, Charles. “The Tempest and the New World.” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Winter, 1979), pp. 29-41.
Grant, Patrick. “The Magic of Charity: A Background to Prospero.” The
Review of English Studies, Vol. 27, No. 105 (Feb., 1976), pp. 1-16.
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Shakespeare and the Uses of Power.” The New York
Review of Books.12 April 2017. www.nybooks.com/articles/2007/04/12/shakespeare-and-the-uses-of-power/
Greenblatt, Stephen “Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority” Shakespeare
and Early Modern Political Thought. Edited by David Armitage, Conal
Condren, and Andrew Fitzmarice, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 64-79.
Kaegi, Ann. “(S)wept from Power: Two Versions of Tyrannicide in Richard
III.” The Renaissance of Emotion. Edited by Meek, Richard and Erin
Sullivan, Manchester University Press, 2017, pp. 130-152.
Kittredge, George Lyman. Witchcraft in Old and New England. Russel and
Russel, 1956.
Lewis, C. S. The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and
Renaissance Literature. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Mcginn, Colin. Shakespeare`s Philosophy: Discovering the Meaning Behind
the Plays. HarperCollins Publishers, 2006.
Meek, Richard. “‘Rue e’en for rith’: Richard II and the Imitation of
Sympathy” The Renaissance of Emotion. Edited by Meek, Richard and
Erin Sullivan, Manchester University Press, 2017, pp. 130-152.
Mullen, Patrick B. “Function of Magic Folk Belief Among Texas Coastal
Fishermen.” The Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 82, No. 325 (Jul. –
Sep., 1969), pp. 214-225.
Niccolò, Machiavelli. The Prince. Edited by William J. Connel. Bedford/
St. Martin’s. 2005.
Phillips, James E. “The Tempest and the Renaissance Idea of Man.”
Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Spring, 1964), pp. 147-159.
Serpieri, Alessandro. “The Labyrinth and the Oracle.” Revisiting the Tempest:
The Capacity to Signify. Edited by Silvia Bigliazzi and Lisanna Calvi,
Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. Edited by Virginia Mason Vaughan and
Alden T. Vaughan, Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2016.
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Edited by Stephen
Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katherine Eisaman Maus. 3rd ed., W.W. Norton & Company, 2016.
Sisson, C. J. “The Magic of Prospero.” Shakespeare Survey vol.11. (1958), pp.
70-77.
Visconsi, Elliott. “The Tempest and the Law of Alliance.” Law and Literature,
Vol. 20, No. 1 (Spring, 2008), pp. 1-20.
Zimbardo, Rose Abdelnour. “Form and Disorder in The Tempest” Shakespeare
Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Winter, 1963), pp. 49-56.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
105551012
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105551012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 施堂模zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Sellari, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 葉怡君zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Yeh, Yi-Chunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 葉怡君zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yeh, Yi-Chunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned 7-八月-2019 15:42:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 7-八月-2019 15:42:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-八月-2019 15:42:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0105551012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124618-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 105551012zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 此篇論文藉由討論莎士比亞《暴風雨》中，以同情(compassion)與能力(competence)為核心的議題，給予劇中主角普洛斯彼羅(Prospero)一個更為公平合理的詮釋。雖然在劇裡擁有魔法與政治權力看似掌握一切，這些力量應該被良善的意圖管束。普羅斯彼羅能夠在同情心的管束下使用自己的能力，也藉此展現了成為一位好君主的本質。
本文第一章為文獻回顧，整理了過往對普羅斯彼羅的評論，以及談論《暴風雨》中，普羅斯彼羅的魔法之相關研究。第二章以介紹文藝復興及其前期的魔法作為開頭，更進一步探討當時魔法與當權者的細密關聯。本章接著分析《暴風雨》中魔法與政治權力的相似性，以及兩者共有的限制。
接續第二章的討論，第三章介紹了《暴風雨》中的同情心，並詳加敘述同情心在劇中如何被詮釋、於普羅斯彼羅的關聯性，以及在談論使用能力時，同情心的重要性。
第四章更詳細地探討同情心與能力之間的關聯，並解釋本篇論文的核心論點：能力必須在同情心的管束下使用。本章並援引伊拉斯謨斯(Erasmus)對於仁君的教導支持此論點，說明良善的意圖才是能使國家持續壯大的本源。
第五章綜合前述，重新檢視過往的論述，並在本文提出的論點下提出可修正之處，也給了普羅斯彼羅一個更公正的詮釋。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis aims to provide a more justifiable interpretation of Prospero by bringing the issue of compassion and competence into discussion. The thesis proposes that powerful as they are, magical and political powers should be guided under a good intention. When demonstrating his competence under the guidance of compassion, Prospero achieves the essence of a good duke.

The thesis first gives a brief review of former approaches in viewing Prospero, and further brings out the issue of magic in the play that has appeared in past criticism. The second chapter introduces magic in Shakespeare’s time and the tight connection between magic and the authority. This chapter later provides a detailed analysis of political power and Prospero’s magic, which are defined as competence in the thesis. This chapter points out the similarities shared by these two powers and also their limitations. Continuing the discussion of the second chapter, the third chapter discusses how compassion is portrayed in the play, how it is related to Prospero, and the significance it possesses when being related to powers. Compassion and competence are brought together in the fourth chapter, which proposes that the later should be governed under the former. The argument is further strengthened by Erasmus’ concerns of a good sovereign. The last chapter brings new perspectives from the former approaches in seeing Prospero, and thus renders a more justifiable position in understanding this powerful magician.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents

Acknowledegments iii
Chinese Abstract iv
English Abstract v
Chapter
1. Introduction 1
I. Approaches to The Tempest 1
II. Literature Review 4
III. Hypothesis and Theoretical Concerns 6

2. Prospero’s Magic and Political Power 9
I. Magic and Political Power in Shakespeare’s Time 9
II. Magic and Political Power in The Tempest 11

3. Compassion 23
I. Compassion in The Tempest 23
II. Prospero’s Compassion 26
III. Compassion and Christianity 33
IV. Compassion in Shakespeare’s Other works 35
V. Conclusion 37

4. Compassion and Competence 39
I. Compassion and Competence 39
II. Utilizing Both Forces 46
III. New Challenges for Prospero 49

5. Conclusion 55
I. Magic’s Function in Literature 55
II. Justifying Prospero 57

Work Cited 62		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1461068 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105551012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 暴風雨zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 莎士比亞zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 魔法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 同情zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Tempesten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Shakespeareen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) magicen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) compassionen_US
dc.title (題名) 莎士比亞《暴風雨》中的同情與能力zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Compassion and Competence in Shakespeare’s The Tempesten_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Works Cited

Bacon, Francis. Essays. Edited by John Pitcher. Penguin Books, 1985.
Bloom, Harold. Modern Critical Interpretation of William Shakespeare`s The
Tempest. Chelsea House Publishers, 1988.
Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Edited by Holbrook Jackson.
The New York Review of Books, 2001.
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Great Books of the Western
World, Vol.20, Encyclopædia Britannica, 1990.
The Cambridge history of English and American literature an encyclopedia in
eighteen volumes. New York: Bartleby.com, 2000. Web.
Egan, Robert. “This Rough Magic: Perspectives of Art and Morality in The
Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2 (Spring, 1972), pp. 171-182.
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Education of a Christian Prince. Edited by Lisa Jardine. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Frey, Charles. “The Tempest and the New World.” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Winter, 1979), pp. 29-41.
Grant, Patrick. “The Magic of Charity: A Background to Prospero.” The
Review of English Studies, Vol. 27, No. 105 (Feb., 1976), pp. 1-16.
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Shakespeare and the Uses of Power.” The New York
Review of Books.12 April 2017. www.nybooks.com/articles/2007/04/12/shakespeare-and-the-uses-of-power/
Greenblatt, Stephen “Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority” Shakespeare
and Early Modern Political Thought. Edited by David Armitage, Conal
Condren, and Andrew Fitzmarice, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 64-79.
Kaegi, Ann. “(S)wept from Power: Two Versions of Tyrannicide in Richard
III.” The Renaissance of Emotion. Edited by Meek, Richard and Erin
Sullivan, Manchester University Press, 2017, pp. 130-152.
Kittredge, George Lyman. Witchcraft in Old and New England. Russel and
Russel, 1956.
Lewis, C. S. The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and
Renaissance Literature. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Mcginn, Colin. Shakespeare`s Philosophy: Discovering the Meaning Behind
the Plays. HarperCollins Publishers, 2006.
Meek, Richard. “‘Rue e’en for rith’: Richard II and the Imitation of
Sympathy” The Renaissance of Emotion. Edited by Meek, Richard and
Erin Sullivan, Manchester University Press, 2017, pp. 130-152.
Mullen, Patrick B. “Function of Magic Folk Belief Among Texas Coastal
Fishermen.” The Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 82, No. 325 (Jul. –
Sep., 1969), pp. 214-225.
Niccolò, Machiavelli. The Prince. Edited by William J. Connel. Bedford/
St. Martin’s. 2005.
Phillips, James E. “The Tempest and the Renaissance Idea of Man.”
Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Spring, 1964), pp. 147-159.
Serpieri, Alessandro. “The Labyrinth and the Oracle.” Revisiting the Tempest:
The Capacity to Signify. Edited by Silvia Bigliazzi and Lisanna Calvi,
Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. Edited by Virginia Mason Vaughan and
Alden T. Vaughan, Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2016.
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Edited by Stephen
Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katherine Eisaman Maus. 3rd ed., W.W. Norton & Company, 2016.
Sisson, C. J. “The Magic of Prospero.” Shakespeare Survey vol.11. (1958), pp.
70-77.
Visconsi, Elliott. “The Tempest and the Law of Alliance.” Law and Literature,
Vol. 20, No. 1 (Spring, 2008), pp. 1-20.
Zimbardo, Rose Abdelnour. “Form and Disorder in The Tempest” Shakespeare
Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Winter, 1963), pp. 49-56.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900622en_US