1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 外國語文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 圖像素養融入多模態英語寫作:以兩位臺灣高中生為例之個案分析
Visual literacy in multimodal English writing: A case study of two senior high students in Taiwan
作者 陳佩如
Chen, Pei-Ju
貢獻者 黃怡萍
Huang, Yi-Ping
陳佩如
Chen, Pei-Ju
關鍵詞 多模態寫作
圖像素養
課程設計
multimodal writing
visual literacy
course design
日期 2019
上傳時間 7-八月-2019 15:42:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 現有文獻指出圖像素養融入多模態寫作能夠促進圖像素養之發展和寫作能力的提升。然而，多數文獻多專注於以英語為母語或第二外語之兒童的故事寫作(Mill, 2014; Vasudevan & Bateman, 2010; Wiseman, Mäkinen, & Kupiainen , 2016)，且寫作作品多停留在句子的程度而未發展成具有結構性的完整段落。因此，本研究旨在探討台灣高中生圖像素養之發展，以及了解圖像的使用和圖像素養如何與學生創作的過程互動，特別是描述文和敘述文。
為了深度刻畫學生圖像素養之發展和圖像與多模態創作之互動，本研究採用質化個案研究方法。本研究透過問卷、觀課紀錄、反思日誌、文件與創作，和訪談逐字稿蒐集兩位研究參與者的資料，並且使用VLC rubric (Bowen, 2017) 和six-step framework ( Braun & Clarke, 2006)來分析研究資料。
研究結果顯示兩位參與者的圖像素養在課程中有進步，但部分的能力因為不同圖像特質而未展現操縱式的圖像思考。圖像在學生設計的過程能夠促進學生聯想和決定題目，在產出過程中幫助學生組織和編排內容，在報告分享多模態創作中幫助讀者預測主題或是更加準確理解文字內容。然而，不同的圖像角色在不同寫作文體中的使用必須要有特定的圖像思考能力才能體現。結果也顯示圖像素養和多模態寫作能夠加深彼此的發展。本文最後建議讓學生接觸不同素材的圖像以發展圖像素養，也建議將圖像素養融入多模態寫作課中，才能讓學生充分發揮圖像之始使用，也創作出更好的多模態寫作作品。
Prior research shows students’ visual literacy and writing ability can be improved under the multimodal writing course involving visual literacy instruction. However, most research is targeted at ESL children’s stories (Mill, 2014; Vasudevan & Bateman, 2010; Wiseman, Mäkinen, & Kupiainen, 2016) at the sentence level without further developing into structured paragraphs. Thus, the current study attempted to explore EFL senior high students’ development of visual literacy and see how visual and visual literacy interact with the composing process of multimodal writing in different genres such as descriptive and narrative paragraph.
To provide insightful understanding of students’ development of visual literacy and how their use of visual in multimodal writing involved their demonstration of visual literacy, a qualitative descriptive case study approach was adopted. Two participants’ data from questionnaires, observations, reflective journals, documents and artifacts, and individual semi-structured interviews across sixteen-week classes were analyzed through Bowen’s (2017) VLC rubric and Braun & Clarke’s (2006) six-step framework.
The results found that two participants’ visual literacy improved across the time in this course but different visual in different genres required different visual thinking abilities, and they did not demonstrate manipulation of visual thinking for every kind of visual stimuli. As for the role of visual in multimodal writing, it enabled students to make association and decide the topic in the designing process, and it helped organize and sequence the contents in the producing process. In the presenting process, visual made readers understand their text better as a content predictor or confirmer. However, the use of visual in multimodal writing required certain visual thinking ability for different genres. The results also showed that visual literacy and multimodal writing reinforce each other. Finally, it is suggested that students should be exposed to various kinds of visual stimuli to develop visual thinking competency fully and that visual literacy-instruction should be taught along with the multimodal writing so that students can make use of visual and demonstrate better multimodal writing.
參考文獻 Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2011). Toward a cohesive theory of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(2), 1-19.
Barbot, B., Randi, J., Tan, M., Levenson, C., Friedlaender, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). From perception to creative writing: A multi-method pilot study of a visual literacy instructional approach. Learning and individual differences, 28, 167-176.
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivaniéc, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. New York: Routledge.
Bowen, T. (2017). Assessing visual literacy: a case study of developing a rubric for identifying and applying criteria to undergraduate student learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), 705-719.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Carspecken, F. P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Chen, H. L. S., & Huang, H. Y. (2017). Advancing 21st century competencies in Taiwan. Retrieved from Asia Society Center for Global Education https://asiasociety.org/files/21st-century-competencies-taiwan.pdf.
Christel, M. T. (2015). Presenting my selfie to the digital World: Visual composition for better representation. In Essentials of teaching and Integrating Visual and Media Literacy (pp. 119-145). Springer International Publishing.
College Entrance Examination Center. (2016). xué kē néng lì cè yàn yīng wén kǎo kē kǎo shì shuō míng [Scholastic ability test— exam description for English as a test subject]. Retrieved from http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/documents/exams/%E5%A4%A7%E8%80%83%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83107%E8%B5%B7%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E6%AA%94/107%E5%AD%B8%E6%B8%AC%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E8%80%83%E8%A9%A6%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E5%AE%9A%E7%A8%BF.pdf
Conoce Honduras (Facebook page manager). (2018). [Untitled illustration]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/ConociendoHonduras/posts/2172144886192262
Cordell, D. M. (2015). Using images to teach critical thinking skills: Visual literacy and digital photography. California: Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved from http://0-ebooks.abc-clio.com.jenda.lib.nccu.edu.tw/?isbn=9781440835162
Darrington, B., & Dousay, T. (2015). Using multimodal writing to motivate struggling students to write. Tech Trends, 59(6), 29-34.
Edwards-Groves, C. J. (2011). The multimodal writing process: Changing practices in contemporary classrooms. Language and Education, 25(1), 49-64.
Flynt, E. S., & Brozo, W. (2010). Visual literacy and the content classroom: A question of now, not when. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 526-528.
González, E. F., Trejo, N. P., & Roux, R. (2017). Assessing EFL university students’ writing: A study of score reliability. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(2), 91–103.
Hailey, D., Miller, A., & Yenawine, P. (2015). Understanding visual literacy: The visual thinking strategies approach. In D. M. Baylen, & A. D`alba (Eds.), Essentials of teaching and integrating visual and media literacy (pp. 49-73). Springer, Cham.
Huang, S. Y. (2015). Action research the intersection of multimodality and critical perspective: Multimodality as subversion. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 21-37.
Jewitt, C. (2005). Technology, literacy, learning. A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
Jewitt, C. (2009). Different approaches to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London, England: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Franks, A., Bourne, J., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., & Reid, J. (2005). English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective on teaching and learning. London: RoutledgeFarmer.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Lam, H. W., Dillon, T., & Chang, E. (2011, March). Determining writing genre: Towards a rubric-based approach to automated essay grading. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (pp. 270-274). IEEE Computer Society.
Lee, H. (2014). Using an arts-integrated multimodal approach to promote English learning: A case study of two Taiwanese junior college students. English Teaching: Practice And Critique, 13(2), 55-75.
Lopatovska, I. (2016a). Engaging young children in visual literacy instruction. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-5.
Lopatovska, I., Hatoum, S., Waterstraut, S., Novak, L., & Sheer, S. (2016b). Not just a pretty picture: visual literacy education through art for young children. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 1197-1227.
Lundy, A. D., & Stephens, A. E. (2015). Beyond the literal: Teaching visual literacy in the 21st century classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1057-1060.
Martinez, T. (Illustrator). (n.d.). The drum [digital storybook]. Retrieved from https://www.raz-plus.com/books/leveled-books/book/?id=3166&langId=1
Matthewman, S. (2003). What does multimodality mean for English? Creative tensions in teaching new texts and new literacies. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 11, no. 1: 31–6.
McGrail, E., & Behizadeh, N. (2017). K-12 multimodal assessment and interactive audiences: An exploratory analysis of existing frameworks. Assessing Writing, 31, 24-38.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mills, K. A., & Exley, B. (2014). Time, space, and text in the elementary school digital writing classroom. Written Communication, 31(4), 434-469.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2016). shí èr nián guó mín jī běn jiāo yù kè chéng gāng yào zōng hé xíng gāo jí zhōng děng xué xiào yǔ wén lǐng yù — yīng yǔ wén [12-year basic education guidelines for secondary school education—English]. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/93/pta_12435_6824689_81341.pdf.
Moffett, J., & Wagner, B. J. (1983). Student-centered language arts and reading, K-13: A handbook for teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
National Academic for Educational Research. (2017). shí èr nián guó mín jī běn jiāo yù kè chéng gāng yào yǔ wén lǐng yù—yīng yǔ wén kè chéng shǒu cè [12-year curriculum basic education guidelines for Language-art— English course handbook]. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/183946265.pdf
Ntelioglou, B. Y., Fannin, J., Montanera, M., & Cummins, J. (2014). A multilingual and multimodal approach to literacy teaching and learning in urban education: A collaborative inquiry project in an inner city elementary school. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 533.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. Continuum companion to discourse analysis, 120-137.
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2016). Digital stories: Bringing multimodal texts to the Spanish writing classroom. ReCALL, 28(3), 326-342.
Pantaleo, S. (2013). Matters of design and visual literacy: One middle years student`s multimodal artifact. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(3), 351-376.
Ranker, J. (2009). Redesigning and transforming: A case study of the role of semiotic import in early composing processes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(3), 319–347.
Rowsell, J., & Decoste, E. (2012). (Re)designing writing in English class: a multimodal approach to teaching writing. Pedagogies, 7(3), 246-260.
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. New York: Routledge.
Rius, A. (Photographer). (2018). A dog’s life [digital image]. Retrieved from https://www.aliciariusphotography.com/a-dogs-life/
Sarar Kuzu, T. (2016). The impact of a semiotic analysis theory-based writing activity on students’ writing skills. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, (63), 37-54.
Schmitz, S. (Illustrator). (2018). About psychological abuse in relationships [digital image]. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/p/BjfGVSmD_CN/
Sinatra, R. (1986). Visual literacy connections to thinking, reading and writing. New York: C. C. Thomas.
Tardy, M. C. (2012). Genre‐based language teaching. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 2278-2281). Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0453
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), 60-93.
Tseng, M. Y. (2014). EFL student writing as a social and multimodal practice: A case study. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 48-70.
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Vasudevan, L., Schultz, K., & Bateman, J. (2010). Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written communication, 27(4), 442-468.
Westraadt, G. (2016). Deepening visual literacy through the use of metacognitive reading instruction strategies. Perspectives in Education, 34(1), 182-198.
Wiseman, A. M., Mäkinen, M., & Kupiainen, R. (2016). Literacy through photography: Multimodal and visual literacy in a third grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(5), 537-544.
Woolley, G. (2014). Using visualisation and imagery to enhance reading comprehension. In G. Barton (Ed.), Literacy in the arts: Retheorising learning and teaching. (pp. 215-234). Springer, Cham.
Wu, C. H., & Huang, J. J. (2010). zhōng xiǎo xué kè chéng zhèng cè gǎi gé zhī yán jiū [A study on curriculum reform policies of elementary and secondary school]. kè chéng yán jiū [Journal of Curriculum Studies] 5(2), 47–62.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. California: Sage.  
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
105551019
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105551019
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃怡萍zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Yi-Pingen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳佩如zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Pei-Juen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳佩如zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Pei-Juen_US
dc.date (日期) 2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned 7-八月-2019 15:42:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 7-八月-2019 15:42:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-八月-2019 15:42:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0105551019en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124619-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 105551019zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 現有文獻指出圖像素養融入多模態寫作能夠促進圖像素養之發展和寫作能力的提升。然而，多數文獻多專注於以英語為母語或第二外語之兒童的故事寫作(Mill, 2014; Vasudevan & Bateman, 2010; Wiseman, Mäkinen, & Kupiainen , 2016)，且寫作作品多停留在句子的程度而未發展成具有結構性的完整段落。因此，本研究旨在探討台灣高中生圖像素養之發展，以及了解圖像的使用和圖像素養如何與學生創作的過程互動，特別是描述文和敘述文。
為了深度刻畫學生圖像素養之發展和圖像與多模態創作之互動，本研究採用質化個案研究方法。本研究透過問卷、觀課紀錄、反思日誌、文件與創作，和訪談逐字稿蒐集兩位研究參與者的資料，並且使用VLC rubric (Bowen, 2017) 和six-step framework ( Braun & Clarke, 2006)來分析研究資料。
研究結果顯示兩位參與者的圖像素養在課程中有進步，但部分的能力因為不同圖像特質而未展現操縱式的圖像思考。圖像在學生設計的過程能夠促進學生聯想和決定題目，在產出過程中幫助學生組織和編排內容，在報告分享多模態創作中幫助讀者預測主題或是更加準確理解文字內容。然而，不同的圖像角色在不同寫作文體中的使用必須要有特定的圖像思考能力才能體現。結果也顯示圖像素養和多模態寫作能夠加深彼此的發展。本文最後建議讓學生接觸不同素材的圖像以發展圖像素養，也建議將圖像素養融入多模態寫作課中，才能讓學生充分發揮圖像之始使用，也創作出更好的多模態寫作作品。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Prior research shows students’ visual literacy and writing ability can be improved under the multimodal writing course involving visual literacy instruction. However, most research is targeted at ESL children’s stories (Mill, 2014; Vasudevan & Bateman, 2010; Wiseman, Mäkinen, & Kupiainen, 2016) at the sentence level without further developing into structured paragraphs. Thus, the current study attempted to explore EFL senior high students’ development of visual literacy and see how visual and visual literacy interact with the composing process of multimodal writing in different genres such as descriptive and narrative paragraph.
To provide insightful understanding of students’ development of visual literacy and how their use of visual in multimodal writing involved their demonstration of visual literacy, a qualitative descriptive case study approach was adopted. Two participants’ data from questionnaires, observations, reflective journals, documents and artifacts, and individual semi-structured interviews across sixteen-week classes were analyzed through Bowen’s (2017) VLC rubric and Braun & Clarke’s (2006) six-step framework.
The results found that two participants’ visual literacy improved across the time in this course but different visual in different genres required different visual thinking abilities, and they did not demonstrate manipulation of visual thinking for every kind of visual stimuli. As for the role of visual in multimodal writing, it enabled students to make association and decide the topic in the designing process, and it helped organize and sequence the contents in the producing process. In the presenting process, visual made readers understand their text better as a content predictor or confirmer. However, the use of visual in multimodal writing required certain visual thinking ability for different genres. The results also showed that visual literacy and multimodal writing reinforce each other. Finally, it is suggested that students should be exposed to various kinds of visual stimuli to develop visual thinking competency fully and that visual literacy-instruction should be taught along with the multimodal writing so that students can make use of visual and demonstrate better multimodal writing.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Chinese Abstract xi
English Abstract xii
Chapter
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review 5
Multimodal Writing Approach 5
Visuals in Multimodal Writing 7
Visual Literacy and Visual-Literacy Instruction 9
The Incorporation of Visual Literacy and Multimodal Writing 10
3. Methodology 13
Research Design 13
Context & Participants 13
Course Design 15
Genre Writing 15
Multimodal Writing Approach 17
Visual Literacy Instruction 18
Data Collection and Procedure 21
Questionnaire 21
Observation 22
Reflective Journal 22
Document and Artifact 23
Individual Interviews with the Participants 23
Data Analysis 25
Trustworthiness 29
Role of the Researcher 29
Research Ethics 29
4. Results 31
Stanley 31
Background Information 31
Conceptualizing Visual Literacy 32
Exploring Visual and Multimodal Writing in Structure of a Paragraph 33
Exploring Visual in the Description of a Scenery 33
Exploring Coherence in Writing a Story 34
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Description of a Person 39
Exploring Visual in the Description of a Person 39
The Use of Visual in Composing Description of a Person 41
The Designing Process 41
The Producing Process 44
The Presenting Process 45
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Description of a Scenery 46
Exploring Visual in Description of a Scenery 46
The Use of Visual in Composing Description of a Scenery 47
The Designing Process 47
The Producing Process 48
The Presenting Process 49
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Narration of Gender Experience 50
Exploring Visual in Narration 50
The Use of Visual in Composing Narration 51
Designing Process 51
Producing Process 52
Presenting Process 54
Comparison of Visual in Different Genres 54
Frank 58
Background Information 58
Conceptualizing Visual Literacy 58
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Structure of a Paragraph 59
Exploring Visual in the Description of a Scenery 59
Exploring Coherence in Writing a Story 59
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Description of a Person 62
Exploring Visual in the Description of a Person 62
The Use of Visual in Composing Description of a Person 63
The Designing Process 63
The Producing Process 65
The Presenting Process 67
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Description of a Scenery 67
Exploring Visual in Description of a Scenery 67
The Use of Visual in Composing Description of a Scenery 68
The Designing Process 68
The Producing Process 69
The Presenting Process 71
Exploring Visual and multimodal Writing in Narration of Gender Experience 72
Exploring Visual in Narration 72
The Use of Visual in Composing Narration 73
The Designing Process 73
The Producing Process 73
The Presenting Process 76
Comparison of Visual in Different Genres 76
5. Discussion 79
Research Question 1. What is EFL senior high students’ development of visual literacy under the multimodal approach and visual-literacy based instruction across time? 79
From Recognition and Identification to Manipulation of Visual Thinking as a Visual Consumer 79
From Recreation to Creation for Multimodal Writing as a Visual Creator 83
Research Question 2 & 3. How do the participants use visuals in their multimodal structured writings in different genres, including descriptive and narrative paragraphs? How does the participants’ visual literacy interact with their composing of multimodal structured genre writing? 85
Visual Inspires Ideas in the Designing Process 85
Visual as Associator for Abstract Ideas in Descriptive paragraphs 85
Visual as Topic Decider for Concrete Ideas in Descriptive paragraphs. 86
Visual as Writing Prompt for Descriptive Paragraphs and Narrative Paragraphs. 86
Visual helps Organize the Structure in the Producing Process 88
Visual as sequencing arranger for descriptive and narrative paragraphs.. 88
Visual as structure organizer for descriptive and narrative paragraphs. 89
Awareness of Coherence from Visual in the Producing Process 90
Visual Indicates Structure and Main Idea in the Presenting Process 92
6. Conclusion 95
Summary of the Study 95
Pedagogical Implications 97
Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Research 99
Conclusion 100
Reference 102
Appendix A: Design of the Course 108
Appendix B: Detailed descriptions of the course for each week 111
Appendix C: Reflective journal 122
Reflective Journal 1 122
Reflective Journal 2 122
Reflective Journal 3 124
Reflective Journal 4 125
Appendix D: Interview Protocols for the Two Participants 127
First Interview Protocol 127
Second Interview Protocol 130
Third Interview Protocol 133		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 5002908 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105551019en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多模態寫作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 圖像素養zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 課程設計zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) multimodal writingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) visual literacyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) course designen_US
dc.title (題名) 圖像素養融入多模態英語寫作:以兩位臺灣高中生為例之個案分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Visual literacy in multimodal English writing: A case study of two senior high students in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2011). Toward a cohesive theory of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(2), 1-19.
Barbot, B., Randi, J., Tan, M., Levenson, C., Friedlaender, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). From perception to creative writing: A multi-method pilot study of a visual literacy instructional approach. Learning and individual differences, 28, 167-176.
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivaniéc, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. New York: Routledge.
Bowen, T. (2017). Assessing visual literacy: a case study of developing a rubric for identifying and applying criteria to undergraduate student learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), 705-719.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Carspecken, F. P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Chen, H. L. S., & Huang, H. Y. (2017). Advancing 21st century competencies in Taiwan. Retrieved from Asia Society Center for Global Education https://asiasociety.org/files/21st-century-competencies-taiwan.pdf.
Christel, M. T. (2015). Presenting my selfie to the digital World: Visual composition for better representation. In Essentials of teaching and Integrating Visual and Media Literacy (pp. 119-145). Springer International Publishing.
College Entrance Examination Center. (2016). xué kē néng lì cè yàn yīng wén kǎo kē kǎo shì shuō míng [Scholastic ability test— exam description for English as a test subject]. Retrieved from http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/documents/exams/%E5%A4%A7%E8%80%83%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83107%E8%B5%B7%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E6%AA%94/107%E5%AD%B8%E6%B8%AC%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E8%80%83%E8%A9%A6%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E5%AE%9A%E7%A8%BF.pdf
Conoce Honduras (Facebook page manager). (2018). [Untitled illustration]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/ConociendoHonduras/posts/2172144886192262
Cordell, D. M. (2015). Using images to teach critical thinking skills: Visual literacy and digital photography. California: Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved from http://0-ebooks.abc-clio.com.jenda.lib.nccu.edu.tw/?isbn=9781440835162
Darrington, B., & Dousay, T. (2015). Using multimodal writing to motivate struggling students to write. Tech Trends, 59(6), 29-34.
Edwards-Groves, C. J. (2011). The multimodal writing process: Changing practices in contemporary classrooms. Language and Education, 25(1), 49-64.
Flynt, E. S., & Brozo, W. (2010). Visual literacy and the content classroom: A question of now, not when. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 526-528.
González, E. F., Trejo, N. P., & Roux, R. (2017). Assessing EFL university students’ writing: A study of score reliability. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(2), 91–103.
Hailey, D., Miller, A., & Yenawine, P. (2015). Understanding visual literacy: The visual thinking strategies approach. In D. M. Baylen, & A. D`alba (Eds.), Essentials of teaching and integrating visual and media literacy (pp. 49-73). Springer, Cham.
Huang, S. Y. (2015). Action research the intersection of multimodality and critical perspective: Multimodality as subversion. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 21-37.
Jewitt, C. (2005). Technology, literacy, learning. A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
Jewitt, C. (2009). Different approaches to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London, England: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Franks, A., Bourne, J., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., & Reid, J. (2005). English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective on teaching and learning. London: RoutledgeFarmer.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Lam, H. W., Dillon, T., & Chang, E. (2011, March). Determining writing genre: Towards a rubric-based approach to automated essay grading. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (pp. 270-274). IEEE Computer Society.
Lee, H. (2014). Using an arts-integrated multimodal approach to promote English learning: A case study of two Taiwanese junior college students. English Teaching: Practice And Critique, 13(2), 55-75.
Lopatovska, I. (2016a). Engaging young children in visual literacy instruction. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-5.
Lopatovska, I., Hatoum, S., Waterstraut, S., Novak, L., & Sheer, S. (2016b). Not just a pretty picture: visual literacy education through art for young children. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 1197-1227.
Lundy, A. D., & Stephens, A. E. (2015). Beyond the literal: Teaching visual literacy in the 21st century classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1057-1060.
Martinez, T. (Illustrator). (n.d.). The drum [digital storybook]. Retrieved from https://www.raz-plus.com/books/leveled-books/book/?id=3166&langId=1
Matthewman, S. (2003). What does multimodality mean for English? Creative tensions in teaching new texts and new literacies. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 11, no. 1: 31–6.
McGrail, E., & Behizadeh, N. (2017). K-12 multimodal assessment and interactive audiences: An exploratory analysis of existing frameworks. Assessing Writing, 31, 24-38.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mills, K. A., & Exley, B. (2014). Time, space, and text in the elementary school digital writing classroom. Written Communication, 31(4), 434-469.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2016). shí èr nián guó mín jī běn jiāo yù kè chéng gāng yào zōng hé xíng gāo jí zhōng děng xué xiào yǔ wén lǐng yù — yīng yǔ wén [12-year basic education guidelines for secondary school education—English]. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/93/pta_12435_6824689_81341.pdf.
Moffett, J., & Wagner, B. J. (1983). Student-centered language arts and reading, K-13: A handbook for teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
National Academic for Educational Research. (2017). shí èr nián guó mín jī běn jiāo yù kè chéng gāng yào yǔ wén lǐng yù—yīng yǔ wén kè chéng shǒu cè [12-year curriculum basic education guidelines for Language-art— English course handbook]. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/183946265.pdf
Ntelioglou, B. Y., Fannin, J., Montanera, M., & Cummins, J. (2014). A multilingual and multimodal approach to literacy teaching and learning in urban education: A collaborative inquiry project in an inner city elementary school. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 533.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. Continuum companion to discourse analysis, 120-137.
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2016). Digital stories: Bringing multimodal texts to the Spanish writing classroom. ReCALL, 28(3), 326-342.
Pantaleo, S. (2013). Matters of design and visual literacy: One middle years student`s multimodal artifact. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(3), 351-376.
Ranker, J. (2009). Redesigning and transforming: A case study of the role of semiotic import in early composing processes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(3), 319–347.
Rowsell, J., & Decoste, E. (2012). (Re)designing writing in English class: a multimodal approach to teaching writing. Pedagogies, 7(3), 246-260.
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. New York: Routledge.
Rius, A. (Photographer). (2018). A dog’s life [digital image]. Retrieved from https://www.aliciariusphotography.com/a-dogs-life/
Sarar Kuzu, T. (2016). The impact of a semiotic analysis theory-based writing activity on students’ writing skills. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, (63), 37-54.
Schmitz, S. (Illustrator). (2018). About psychological abuse in relationships [digital image]. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/p/BjfGVSmD_CN/
Sinatra, R. (1986). Visual literacy connections to thinking, reading and writing. New York: C. C. Thomas.
Tardy, M. C. (2012). Genre‐based language teaching. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 2278-2281). Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0453
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), 60-93.
Tseng, M. Y. (2014). EFL student writing as a social and multimodal practice: A case study. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 48-70.
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Vasudevan, L., Schultz, K., & Bateman, J. (2010). Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written communication, 27(4), 442-468.
Westraadt, G. (2016). Deepening visual literacy through the use of metacognitive reading instruction strategies. Perspectives in Education, 34(1), 182-198.
Wiseman, A. M., Mäkinen, M., & Kupiainen, R. (2016). Literacy through photography: Multimodal and visual literacy in a third grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(5), 537-544.
Woolley, G. (2014). Using visualisation and imagery to enhance reading comprehension. In G. Barton (Ed.), Literacy in the arts: Retheorising learning and teaching. (pp. 215-234). Springer, Cham.
Wu, C. H., & Huang, J. J. (2010). zhōng xiǎo xué kè chéng zhèng cè gǎi gé zhī yán jiū [A study on curriculum reform policies of elementary and secondary school]. kè chéng yán jiū [Journal of Curriculum Studies] 5(2), 47–62.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. California: Sage.  		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900350en_US