Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 政府採購賄賂防治的立法─自印尼觀點之跨國比較
The legislation regarding anti-bribery in public procurement: An international comparison from Indonesian perspective作者 希卡蒂
Susanti, Dwi Siska貢獻者 顏玉明
Yan, Anna
希卡蒂
Susanti, Dwi Siska關鍵詞 賄賂
腐敗
治外法權
外賄賂
國際法律
政府採購
透明度
Bribery
Corruption
Extraterritorial
Foreign bribery
International law
Public procurement
Transparency日期 2019 上傳時間 7-Aug-2019 16:39:25 (UTC+8) 摘要 印尼是一個東南亞地區新興國家之一、外國投資流入蓬勃，但是腐敗感知依然高。這腐敗盛行於政府採購中，使政府支出超出原始發展預算。 國際社會皆同意腐敗是一種跨國犯罪而需被國際和國內措施根除。這些措施包括國際、多邊的約束工具，以及國家法律和準則。另外, 此措施也該注意到法律的執行，尤其當實際案件發生時。顯然的，關於政府採購以及賄賂防治法的有限研究已公佈以遏制腐敗，特別是涉及外國供應商時。本研究探討的主要問題為：「政府採購法如何遏制印尼腐敗？」。 而目標為：推究印尼針對政府採購的賄賂防治法規，考核印尼對國際協議有關政府採購賄賂防治的承諾，以及分析印尼政府採購法遏制腐敗的效率。本研究使用演繹方法，允許研究者首先採用邏輯解釋或理論的發展，接著蒐集證據來測試該理論基於初級和次級文獻和數據的使用。初級資料來源為所有有關國際和國內政府採購、腐敗、賄賂、國際公司、等相關法規、報告、和一些法律案件。次級資料來源為書籍，期刊，文章，報紙，報導，和電子文本。研究者亦進行了半結構訪談，而對象為選定的印尼國家官員、國內外廠商的官員，透過訪談探討他們對印尼政府採購的賄賂防治的經驗和看法。本研究締結印尼目前的賄賂防治及政府採購的規則尚未完全有效地遏制住印尼的腐敗現象，儘管為改善政府採購的制度引進了電子採購。此結論衍生成三個主要研究結果。首先，印尼的政府採購規則和制度已經顯示有更好的改善。其次，儘管印尼是幾個國際承諾的締約國員之一，但目前賄賂防治和政府採購規則未完全符合國際標準。 最後，印尼清廉印象指數仍然低，而政府採購的腐敗案件又持續發生。這一研究建議印尼政府需要改進腐敗防止、政府採購規則，以及履行對所有相關利益相關者（包括外利益相關者）更清晰透明的準則；加強採購機構和人員（包括供應商）的誠信措施；提供有效監控、監督的系統 （包括投訴系統）供公眾參與；為所有利益相關者建立腐敗防治的文化； 加強改革政府採購和腐敗防治的政治意願；以及其他確保實行採購系統符合國際規則、承諾的腐敗防治措施。
Indonesia is one of the emerging countries in the South East Asia region that received flourish inflows of foreign investment, yet the corruption perception remains high. The prevalence mostly occurred in public procurement that risks government spending than initially expected for the development. The international community agreed upon corruption as transnational crime and ought to be eradicated by international and domestic measures. The measures range from international and multilateral binding instruments to national laws and guidelines. Furthermore, the attention needs to be put on the enforcement of the laws, especially when the actual cases occurred. Notably, limited research has been published on the regulating public procurement and anti-bribery laws to curb corruption in particular when the foreign supplier is involved.This dissertation examines the main question of: ‘How public procurement regulation could curb bribery in Indonesia?’. It aims to study what is Indonesia regulation regarding anti-bribery in public procurement; to examine how is Indonesia commitment to international agreement regarding anti-bribery in public procurement; and to analyse the effectiveness of public procurement regulation to curb bribery in Indonesia.The research methodology is deductive approach, which allows researcher moves first towards the development of logical explanation or theory and next gather evidence to test the theory which is based on the use of primary and secondary literature and data. The primary sources are the all relevant international and domestic regulations concerning public procurement, corruption, bribery, international corporation and other related regulations, reports, and number cases of law. The secondary sources are books, journal, articles, newspaper reports, and electronic texts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to selected Indonesian State Officials and selected officers of foreign firms and Indonesian firms to explore their experiences and perceptions of Indonesia anti-bribery in public procurement.This research concluded that Indonesia’s current anti-bribery and public procurement regulation are not fully effective to curb corruption in Indonesia although the improvement of public procurement system in such e-procurement. This conclusion derived into three main findings. First, Indonesia has shown a better improvement of public procurement regulation and system. Second, the current anti-bribery and public procurement regulation are not fully complying with the international standard, although Indonesia is a state party member of several international commitments. Third, Indonesia corruption perception index is remained low and the corruption cases in public procurement are still occurred. It is recommended for Government of Indonesia to improve anti-corruption and public procurement regulation and guidelines that perform more clearly and transparent for all relevant stakeholder including foreign stakeholder; to strengthen integrity measures for procurement institutions and personnel including supplier; to provide effective monitoring and supervision system that accessible for public participation including complaints system; to build anti-corruption cultures for all stakeholder; to strengthen political will to reform public procurement and anti-corruption; and other anti-corruption measures that needed to ensure the implementation of procurement system in accordance with regulations and international commitments.參考文獻 Articles, Books, Dissertations and ThesesAhmad, F. The Dilemma Of Corruption In Southeast Asia. University of Malaya Press Kuala Lumpur, 2005.Agustina, R. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Indonesia: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.AlHussaini, W. Corruption and the Multi-National Corporation (Thesis). (ISBN: 978-0-494-67339-3), 2010.Alldridge, J. H. Modern Bribery Law: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Bassiouni, M. C. International Criminal Series: Introduction to International Criminal Law (Second Revised ed., Vol. 1). Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T. and Grimes, J. M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Gov. Inf. Q. , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271, 2010Burki, S. and Perry, G. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institution Matter, World Bank, 1998.Calderoni, F. Organized Crime Legislation in the European Union: Harmonization and Approximation of Criminal Law, National Legislations and the EU Framework Decision on the Fight Against Organized Crime. London: Springer, 2010.Carson, L.D.. Laws of Unintended Consequence: The Impacts of Anti-Foreign Bribery Laws on Developing Countries (Dissertation), 2015. Retrieved from Permanent Link http://hdl.handle.net/1807/69029Chazawi, A. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2. Depok, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2002.Chazawi, A. Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Depok, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2016.Choi, Stephen J. and Davis, Kevin E. Foreign Affairs and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Journal of empirical Legal Studies, 11:3, at. 409-445, 2014.Croissant, A., Lorenz, P. Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia: An Introduction to Government and Political Regimes, Springer, 2018.Davis, Kevin E. Why Does The United States Regulate Foreign Bribery: Moralism, Self-Interest, or Altruism?, NYU Annual Survey Of American Law, 67, at 497-511, 2012.Deming, S. H. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the new international norms, Chicago: American Bar Association, 2010.Directorate General for External Policies. The Extraterritorial Effects of Legislation and Policies in the EU and US (Vols. EXPO/B/DEVE/FWC/2009-01/Lot3/03). Belgium: European Parliament, 2012.Eicher, S. Corruption in International Business: The Challenge of Cultural and Legal Diversity. (S. Eicher, Ed.) Burlington, US: Gower Publishing, 2009.Elegbe, S. W.. Fighting Corruption in Public Procurement: A Comparative Analysis of Disqualification of Debartment Measures. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2012.Faupel, S.L., Neggers,Y., Olken, B.A & Pande, R. Can Electronic Procurement improve infrastructure provision? Evidence form Public Works in India and Indonesia. Working Paper 20344. Cambridge, USA, 2014.Gourdon, J. Mapping the OECD Government Procurement Taxonomy with International Best Practices: An Implementation to ASEAN Countries, in OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 216, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/1bd4d59a-enHeineman, B. and Heinmann, F. The long War Against Corruption, Foreign Affair, May/June 2006.Hopper, T.; Tsamenyi, M; Uddin, S.; Wickramasinghe, D. Management accounting in less developed countries: what is known and needs knowing in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 22, n. 3, 469-514. 2019, DOI: 10.1108/09513570910945697Hylton, A. H. Research Handbook on the Economic of Criminal Law. UK: Edwar Elgar Publishing, 2012.Jones, David S. The Feature and recent reforms of government procurement in Singapore, in Louse Knight, et.all. Public Procurement: International Cases and Commentary, Routlegde, London, 2007.Jones, David S. Curbing Corruption in Government Procurement in Southeast Asia: Challenges and Constraints, in Asian Journal of Political Science Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 145-172, 2009Indonesia Republic, Ministry of National Development Planning, Public Private Partnership: Infrastructure Projects Plan In Indonesia, May 2015.Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Zoido-Lobaton, P. Governance Matters, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2196, 1999.kkh increasing in the number as corruption offender Plan In Indonesia, May 2015. cy Research Working Paper 2196, 1999 See Eensus: Institution Matter, Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:3, 681-712 2006.Leavy, S. N.-B. The Practice of Qualitative Research (Second ed.). California: SAGE Publication, 2011.Li, B. Public Versus Private Enforcement of Law An Economic Analysis (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 9837226), 1998Manacorda, Stefano F. C. Preventing Corporate Corruption: The Anti-Birbery Compliance Model. Switzerland: Springer, 2014.Mauro, Paulo. Corruption on Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110:3, at 681-71, 1997.Medema, N. M. Economic and The Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism and Beyond. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006.Meyer, M. J. The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts (Vol. 11). Switzerland: Springer, 2015.Mistry, J. and Jalal, A. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between e-government and Corruption, The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 2012. DOI: 10.4192/1577-8517-v12_Mujundar, S.N. (2000). Essay in International Trade and Corruption (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 9979000)Neupane, A., Soar. J., Vaidya, K., and Yong, J. Role Of Public E-Procurement Technology To Reduce Corruption In Government Procurement, in International Public Procurement Conference, Seattle, Washington, August 17-19, 2012.Neupane, A., Soar. J., Vaidya, K., and Yong, J. Willingness to adopt e-procurement to reduce corruption, in Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 283–308, 2014.Oduor, Jacinta A. et. all. Left out of the Bargain: Settlements in Foreign Bribery Cases and Implications for Asset Recovery, The Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR), World Bank, UNODC, Washington DC, 2014.O`Shea, E. The Bribery Act 2000: A Practical Guide. Bristol: Jordan Publishing, 2011.Quah, Jon. S.T. Combating Corruption Singapore-Style: Lesson For Other ASIAN Countries, Maryland Series in Contemporary Studies, Number 2 (189), 2007.Quah, Jon. S.T. Curbing Corruption in ASIAN Countries: An Impossible Dream?. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 20, Emerald, 2011.Pieth, Mark L. A. The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Comentary. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Pilchman, D.D. A Practices Theory of International Law (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database, 2014. UMI No. 3637749Posadas, A. Combating Corruption under International Law, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 10:345, 2000.Ronald L. Holzhacker, R. W. Development and Governance: Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia (Vol. 2). Switzerland: Springer, 2016.Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and government, International Peacekeeping, 15:3, 2008.Ryzin, D. K. Research Methods in Practice: Strategies for Decription and Causation. California: SAGE Publication, 2011.Sibery, B. P. Bribery and Corruption: Navigating the Global Risks. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Simon, Francesco D. and Zagaris, Bruce. Foreign Bribery Legislation on Developing Countries and the Role of Donor Agencies, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Center, 2014.Sirait, Ningrum N. Potensi Konvergensi Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Potential Convergence of Competition Law). Limited Discussion KPPU, Jakarta, 28 Maret 2016.Stoitchkova, D. Towards Corporate Liability in International Criminal Law. Netherland: Intersentia, 2010.Susanti, Dwi. et all. Training Module Handling Cases of Corruption The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). KPK, limited publication, Jakarta: November 2018.Rotchanakitumnuai, S. The governance evidence of e- government procurement,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy , vol. 7, no. 3, at. 309–321, 2013.Tracy, S. J. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Widyawati, A. Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jakarta Timur, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika, 2014.Yukins, G. M. Integrity and Efficiency in Sustainable Public Contracts: Balancing Corruption Concerns in Public Procurement Internationally. Brussel: Bruylant, 2014.Regulations and International Organization PublicationAfrican Union 2003, African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption, 11 July 2003, available at: http://www.africa-union.org.EU 1997a, Convention drawn on the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union on the fight against Corruption involving Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of the European Union (OJ C195, 25 June 1997, 2:11).EU 1997b, Protocol drawn on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Interpretation, by way of Preliminary Rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (OJ C151, 20 May 1997, 2:14).EU 1997c, Explanatory Report on the Second Protocol drawn on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests, text approved by the Council on 19 December 1997 (OJ C11, 15 January 1998, 8).EU 1998a, Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines Imposed pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65(5) of the ECSC Treaty (OJ C9, 14 January 1998, 3).EU 2005b, Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the Fight against Organised Crime, 19 January 2005 (COM (2005) 6 final).FCPA 1977, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Pub.L.No. 95-213, 91 Stat. 1494).FCPA 1988, The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act 1988, Pub.L.No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107 (3 August 1988).FCPA 1998, International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, Pub.L.No. 105-366, 112 Stat. 3302 (10 November 1998).GRECO 1999, Resolution (99)5 establishing the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) (adopted 1 May 1999).ICC 2005, International Chamber of Commerce, Rules of Conduct and Recommendations on Combating Extortion and Bribery in International Business Transactions (first adopted 1977, revised 2005).Indonesia Republic 1948, Law No. 1 year 1946 on Criminal Code.Indonesia Republic 1981, Law No. 8 year 1981 on Criminal Procedure.Indonesia Republic 1999, Law No. 31 year 1999 on Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Indonesian Law No. 20 year 2001.Indonesia Republic 2002, Law No. 30 year 2002 on Corruption Eradication CommissionIndonesia Republic 2009, Law No. 46 year 2009 on Corruption Court.Indonesia Republic 2010, Presidential Regulation No. 54 year 2010 on Public Procurement of Goods and Service.Indonesia Republic 2018, Presidential Regulation No. 16 year 2018 on Public Procurement of Goods and Service.OAS 1996, Inter-American Convention against Corruption (G.A/RES/1398(XXVI- O/96, 29 March 1996).OECD 1994, Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 27 May 1994).OECD 1996, Recommendation on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes of Foreign Public Officials (adopted 11 April 1996, C(96)27/FINAL).OECD 1997a, Revised Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 23 May 1997).OECD 1997b, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (adopted 21 November 1997, signed 17 December 1997).OECD 1998, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase1 (DAFFE/IME(98)17).OECD 2001b, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Text, Commentary and Clarifications, 31 October 2001 (DAFFE/IME/WPG(2000)15/FINAL).OECD 2001c, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase 2 (DAFFE/IME(2001)3).OECD 2001d, Notes by the Secretariat, The Liability of Legal Persons for Bribery Acts (DAFFE/IME/BR(2001)12).OECD 2004b, Principles of Corporate Governance, endorsed by OECD Ministers in 1999 (reviewed in 2004).OECD 2004c, Steps taken and planned Future Actions by Participating Countries to Ratify and Implement the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 12 November 2004 (DAFFE/IME/BR(2004)9/REV2).OECD 2005a, Steps taken by State Parties to Implement and Enforce the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, Submissions as of December 2005, available at: http://www.oecd.org.OECD 2005b, Trade Directorate, Trade Commission, Working Party on Export Credits and Credit Guarantees, Export Credits and Bribery: Review of Responses to the 2004 Revised Survey on Measures taken to Combat Bribery in Officially supported Export Credits, Situation as of 30 September 2005 (TD/ECG(2005)4/REV).OECD 2006a, OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Phase 2 Monitoring Information Resources, Paris.OECD 2006b, OECD WGB, The Mid-Term Study (forthcoming) (DAF/INV/BR/ WD(2005)19/FINAL).OECD 2007, Integrity in Public Procurement: Good Practices from A to Z, available at http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/38588964.pdfOECD 2008. Snapshot on Indonesia’s Public Procurement System as at June, 2007. Piloting OECD/ DAC Procurement JV Baseline Indicator (BLI) Benchmarking Methodology Version 4.OECD 2010. the Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS) version 4. available at https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/benchmarking-assessment-methodology-public-procurement-systems.htmPACI 2005, Partnering against Corruption, Principles for Countering Bribery, An Initiative of the World Economic Forum in Partnership with Transparency International and the Basel Institute on Governance.Sentencing Guidelines 1991, United States Sentencing Commission 1991, Guidelines Manual, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.Sentencing Guidelines 2004, United States Sentencing Commission 2004, Revised Guidelines Manual, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.Sentencing Guidelines 2005, United States Sentencing Commission 2005, Revised Guidelines Manual incorporated with new amendments, 1 November 2005, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act 2000, Pub.L.No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (25 April 2000).Transparency International, Bribery Payer Index 2011, available at http://www.transparency.org/bpi2011Transparency International. 2011. APEC Procurement Transparency Standards in Indonesia: A work in Progress. available at https://www.coalitionforintegrity.org/archive/news/documents/IndonesiaAPECProcurementStandardsReportenglish.pdfTRACE International Inc., Global Enforcement Report 2016. US, March 2017, available at https://www.traceinternational.org/gerWorld Bank, Group Flagship Report, Doing Business 2017 Equal Opportunity for all: Economy Profile 2017 Indonesia, 14th edition, 2016, available at http://www.business-anti-corruption.org/country-profiles/east-asia-the-pacific/indonesia/snapshot.aspxWorld Trade Organization, Government Procurement Agreement, 1994, available at https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/rev-gpr-94_01_e.htm#articleXIIIUN 2000, United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (G.A/ RES/55/25, 15 November 2000).UN 2003, General Assembly Resolution (A/RES/58/422, 31 October 2003), Annex United Nations Convention Against Corruption.UN. UNCITRAL Status, available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/procurement_infrastructure/2011Model_status.htmlUN 2014. Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public ProcurementUNCITRAL. (2014). Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/procurem/ml-procurement-2011/2011-Model-Law-on-Public-Procurement-e.pdf.Vienna Convention 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 (UKTS No. 58 (1980), Cmnd 7964).WebsitesIndonesia Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption Cases by Type of Corruption, 31 December 2018, available at https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/tindak-pidana-korupsi/tpk-berdasarkan-profesi-jabatanIndonesia Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption Cases by Type of Offender, 31 December 2018, available at http://acch.kpk.go.id/berdasarkan-jenis-perkaraIndonesia Corruption Eradication Commission. Kajian Pencegahan Korupsi pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah.(Research on Corruption Prevention on Public Procurement of Goods and Service). Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengembangan KPK, Indonesia, Jakarta, 2015, available at https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/berkas/litbang/kajian-pencegahan-korupsi-pada-pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa-pemerintahLKPP. Bahan Sosialisasi Peraturan Presiden No.16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Direktorat Pengembangan Strategi dan Kebijakan Pengadaan Umum. Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Strategi dan Kebijakan LKPP, 2018, available at http://berkas.dpr.go.id/setjen/dokumen/ittama-Knowledge-Sharing-Bahan-Sosialisasi-Peraturan-Presiden-Nomor-16-Tahun-2018-tentang-Pengadaan-BarangJasa-Pemerintah-1524134653.pdfMSCI, Emerging Markets Index, February 2017, available at https://www.msci.com/emerging-marketsOECD, The State parties report on the implementation of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htmWorld Economic Forum, Global Risk Report 2007-2017, 12th edition, 2017.U4 Anti-corruption Resource Centre, available at http://www.u4.no/glossary/active-and-passive-bribery/UN, Signatories and ratification status of UNCAC as of 12 December 2016, available at further on https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.htmlWorld Bank, Gross Domestic Product Ranking 2015, available at http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdfWorld Meter, Countries in the world by population, 2017, available at http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/ 描述 博士
國立政治大學
法律學系
1026515131資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1026515131 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 顏玉明 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Yan, Anna en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 希卡蒂 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Susanti, Dwi Siska en_US dc.creator (作者) 希卡蒂 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Susanti, Dwi Siska en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 7-Aug-2019 16:39:25 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 7-Aug-2019 16:39:25 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-Aug-2019 16:39:25 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1026515131 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124891 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 法律學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 1026515131 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 印尼是一個東南亞地區新興國家之一、外國投資流入蓬勃，但是腐敗感知依然高。這腐敗盛行於政府採購中，使政府支出超出原始發展預算。 國際社會皆同意腐敗是一種跨國犯罪而需被國際和國內措施根除。這些措施包括國際、多邊的約束工具，以及國家法律和準則。另外, 此措施也該注意到法律的執行，尤其當實際案件發生時。顯然的，關於政府採購以及賄賂防治法的有限研究已公佈以遏制腐敗，特別是涉及外國供應商時。本研究探討的主要問題為：「政府採購法如何遏制印尼腐敗？」。 而目標為：推究印尼針對政府採購的賄賂防治法規，考核印尼對國際協議有關政府採購賄賂防治的承諾，以及分析印尼政府採購法遏制腐敗的效率。本研究使用演繹方法，允許研究者首先採用邏輯解釋或理論的發展，接著蒐集證據來測試該理論基於初級和次級文獻和數據的使用。初級資料來源為所有有關國際和國內政府採購、腐敗、賄賂、國際公司、等相關法規、報告、和一些法律案件。次級資料來源為書籍，期刊，文章，報紙，報導，和電子文本。研究者亦進行了半結構訪談，而對象為選定的印尼國家官員、國內外廠商的官員，透過訪談探討他們對印尼政府採購的賄賂防治的經驗和看法。本研究締結印尼目前的賄賂防治及政府採購的規則尚未完全有效地遏制住印尼的腐敗現象，儘管為改善政府採購的制度引進了電子採購。此結論衍生成三個主要研究結果。首先，印尼的政府採購規則和制度已經顯示有更好的改善。其次，儘管印尼是幾個國際承諾的締約國員之一，但目前賄賂防治和政府採購規則未完全符合國際標準。 最後，印尼清廉印象指數仍然低，而政府採購的腐敗案件又持續發生。這一研究建議印尼政府需要改進腐敗防止、政府採購規則，以及履行對所有相關利益相關者（包括外利益相關者）更清晰透明的準則；加強採購機構和人員（包括供應商）的誠信措施；提供有效監控、監督的系統 （包括投訴系統）供公眾參與；為所有利益相關者建立腐敗防治的文化； 加強改革政府採購和腐敗防治的政治意願；以及其他確保實行採購系統符合國際規則、承諾的腐敗防治措施。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Indonesia is one of the emerging countries in the South East Asia region that received flourish inflows of foreign investment, yet the corruption perception remains high. The prevalence mostly occurred in public procurement that risks government spending than initially expected for the development. The international community agreed upon corruption as transnational crime and ought to be eradicated by international and domestic measures. The measures range from international and multilateral binding instruments to national laws and guidelines. Furthermore, the attention needs to be put on the enforcement of the laws, especially when the actual cases occurred. Notably, limited research has been published on the regulating public procurement and anti-bribery laws to curb corruption in particular when the foreign supplier is involved.This dissertation examines the main question of: ‘How public procurement regulation could curb bribery in Indonesia?’. It aims to study what is Indonesia regulation regarding anti-bribery in public procurement; to examine how is Indonesia commitment to international agreement regarding anti-bribery in public procurement; and to analyse the effectiveness of public procurement regulation to curb bribery in Indonesia.The research methodology is deductive approach, which allows researcher moves first towards the development of logical explanation or theory and next gather evidence to test the theory which is based on the use of primary and secondary literature and data. The primary sources are the all relevant international and domestic regulations concerning public procurement, corruption, bribery, international corporation and other related regulations, reports, and number cases of law. The secondary sources are books, journal, articles, newspaper reports, and electronic texts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to selected Indonesian State Officials and selected officers of foreign firms and Indonesian firms to explore their experiences and perceptions of Indonesia anti-bribery in public procurement.This research concluded that Indonesia’s current anti-bribery and public procurement regulation are not fully effective to curb corruption in Indonesia although the improvement of public procurement system in such e-procurement. This conclusion derived into three main findings. First, Indonesia has shown a better improvement of public procurement regulation and system. Second, the current anti-bribery and public procurement regulation are not fully complying with the international standard, although Indonesia is a state party member of several international commitments. Third, Indonesia corruption perception index is remained low and the corruption cases in public procurement are still occurred. It is recommended for Government of Indonesia to improve anti-corruption and public procurement regulation and guidelines that perform more clearly and transparent for all relevant stakeholder including foreign stakeholder; to strengthen integrity measures for procurement institutions and personnel including supplier; to provide effective monitoring and supervision system that accessible for public participation including complaints system; to build anti-corruption cultures for all stakeholder; to strengthen political will to reform public procurement and anti-corruption; and other anti-corruption measures that needed to ensure the implementation of procurement system in accordance with regulations and international commitments. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents TTable of Contents提要 iAbstract iiTable of Contents ivAbbreviation viiiAcknowledgement ixChapter I: Introduction 1I.1. Background 1I.2. Research Question 11I.3. Research Objective 12I.4. Significance and Contribution of the Study 12I.5. Scope and Limitation 14I.6. Chapter Structure 17Chapter II. Conceptual Framework and Methodology 18II.1. Literature Review 18II.1.1. Theory of Corruption 18II.1.2. Compliance-Based Theory of International Law 28II.2. Research Methodology 33II.2.1. Interview 34II.2.2. Questioner 37Chapter III. Regulation of Anti-Bribery and Public Procurement in Indonesia: Status and Challenge 39III.1. International Commitment on Anti-Bribery 39III.2. International Commitment on Public Procurement 47III.3. Indonesia on International Commitment in Anti-Bribery and Public Procurement 51III.4. Indonesia Regulation on Anti-Bribery 57III.5. Indonesia Regulation on Public Procurement 62III.6. Indonesia Electronic Procurement System 75Chapter IV: The Effectiveness of Public Procurement Regulation to curb Bribery in Indonesia 82IV.1. Analysis of Indonesia Regulation on Anti-Bribery in Public Procurement with International Standard 82IV.2. Indonesia Corruption Cases in Public Procurement 88IV.3. Corruption Perception in Public Procurement 98Chapter V. Benchmark of Anti Bribery in Public Procurement: Lesson Learn from ASEAN Countries 102V.1. Overview of ASEAN 102V.2. ASEAN Member States Public Procurement and Anti-Corruption System 107Chapter VI. Conclusion 120List of References 123Articles, Books, Dissertations and Theses 123Regulations and International Organization Publication 126Websites 129Appendix 1. Interview Protocol 131A. Interview Protocol for All Respondents 131B. List of Indonesian Public Official Respondents and Questions 131C. List of Foreign Firm Officer Respondents and Questions 133D. Indonesian Firm Officer Respondent and Questions 133Appendix 2. Interview Result 134A. Indonesian Public Official Respondents 134B. Officer of Foreign and Indonesian Firms Respondents 138 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2704609 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1026515131 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 賄賂 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 腐敗 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 治外法權 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外賄賂 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際法律 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政府採購 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 透明度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bribery en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corruption en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Extraterritorial en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Foreign bribery en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) International law en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Public procurement en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transparency en_US dc.title (題名) 政府採購賄賂防治的立法─自印尼觀點之跨國比較 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The legislation regarding anti-bribery in public procurement: An international comparison from Indonesian perspective en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Articles, Books, Dissertations and ThesesAhmad, F. The Dilemma Of Corruption In Southeast Asia. University of Malaya Press Kuala Lumpur, 2005.Agustina, R. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Indonesia: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.AlHussaini, W. Corruption and the Multi-National Corporation (Thesis). (ISBN: 978-0-494-67339-3), 2010.Alldridge, J. H. Modern Bribery Law: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Bassiouni, M. C. International Criminal Series: Introduction to International Criminal Law (Second Revised ed., Vol. 1). Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T. and Grimes, J. M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Gov. Inf. Q. , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271, 2010Burki, S. and Perry, G. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institution Matter, World Bank, 1998.Calderoni, F. Organized Crime Legislation in the European Union: Harmonization and Approximation of Criminal Law, National Legislations and the EU Framework Decision on the Fight Against Organized Crime. London: Springer, 2010.Carson, L.D.. Laws of Unintended Consequence: The Impacts of Anti-Foreign Bribery Laws on Developing Countries (Dissertation), 2015. Retrieved from Permanent Link http://hdl.handle.net/1807/69029Chazawi, A. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2. Depok, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2002.Chazawi, A. Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Depok, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2016.Choi, Stephen J. and Davis, Kevin E. Foreign Affairs and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Journal of empirical Legal Studies, 11:3, at. 409-445, 2014.Croissant, A., Lorenz, P. Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia: An Introduction to Government and Political Regimes, Springer, 2018.Davis, Kevin E. Why Does The United States Regulate Foreign Bribery: Moralism, Self-Interest, or Altruism?, NYU Annual Survey Of American Law, 67, at 497-511, 2012.Deming, S. H. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the new international norms, Chicago: American Bar Association, 2010.Directorate General for External Policies. The Extraterritorial Effects of Legislation and Policies in the EU and US (Vols. EXPO/B/DEVE/FWC/2009-01/Lot3/03). Belgium: European Parliament, 2012.Eicher, S. Corruption in International Business: The Challenge of Cultural and Legal Diversity. (S. Eicher, Ed.) Burlington, US: Gower Publishing, 2009.Elegbe, S. W.. Fighting Corruption in Public Procurement: A Comparative Analysis of Disqualification of Debartment Measures. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2012.Faupel, S.L., Neggers,Y., Olken, B.A & Pande, R. Can Electronic Procurement improve infrastructure provision? Evidence form Public Works in India and Indonesia. Working Paper 20344. Cambridge, USA, 2014.Gourdon, J. Mapping the OECD Government Procurement Taxonomy with International Best Practices: An Implementation to ASEAN Countries, in OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 216, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/1bd4d59a-enHeineman, B. and Heinmann, F. The long War Against Corruption, Foreign Affair, May/June 2006.Hopper, T.; Tsamenyi, M; Uddin, S.; Wickramasinghe, D. Management accounting in less developed countries: what is known and needs knowing in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 22, n. 3, 469-514. 2019, DOI: 10.1108/09513570910945697Hylton, A. H. Research Handbook on the Economic of Criminal Law. UK: Edwar Elgar Publishing, 2012.Jones, David S. The Feature and recent reforms of government procurement in Singapore, in Louse Knight, et.all. Public Procurement: International Cases and Commentary, Routlegde, London, 2007.Jones, David S. Curbing Corruption in Government Procurement in Southeast Asia: Challenges and Constraints, in Asian Journal of Political Science Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 145-172, 2009Indonesia Republic, Ministry of National Development Planning, Public Private Partnership: Infrastructure Projects Plan In Indonesia, May 2015.Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Zoido-Lobaton, P. Governance Matters, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2196, 1999.kkh increasing in the number as corruption offender Plan In Indonesia, May 2015. cy Research Working Paper 2196, 1999 See Eensus: Institution Matter, Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:3, 681-712 2006.Leavy, S. N.-B. The Practice of Qualitative Research (Second ed.). California: SAGE Publication, 2011.Li, B. Public Versus Private Enforcement of Law An Economic Analysis (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 9837226), 1998Manacorda, Stefano F. C. Preventing Corporate Corruption: The Anti-Birbery Compliance Model. Switzerland: Springer, 2014.Mauro, Paulo. Corruption on Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110:3, at 681-71, 1997.Medema, N. M. Economic and The Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism and Beyond. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006.Meyer, M. J. The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts (Vol. 11). Switzerland: Springer, 2015.Mistry, J. and Jalal, A. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between e-government and Corruption, The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 2012. DOI: 10.4192/1577-8517-v12_Mujundar, S.N. (2000). Essay in International Trade and Corruption (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 9979000)Neupane, A., Soar. J., Vaidya, K., and Yong, J. Role Of Public E-Procurement Technology To Reduce Corruption In Government Procurement, in International Public Procurement Conference, Seattle, Washington, August 17-19, 2012.Neupane, A., Soar. J., Vaidya, K., and Yong, J. Willingness to adopt e-procurement to reduce corruption, in Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 283–308, 2014.Oduor, Jacinta A. et. all. Left out of the Bargain: Settlements in Foreign Bribery Cases and Implications for Asset Recovery, The Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR), World Bank, UNODC, Washington DC, 2014.O`Shea, E. The Bribery Act 2000: A Practical Guide. Bristol: Jordan Publishing, 2011.Quah, Jon. S.T. Combating Corruption Singapore-Style: Lesson For Other ASIAN Countries, Maryland Series in Contemporary Studies, Number 2 (189), 2007.Quah, Jon. S.T. Curbing Corruption in ASIAN Countries: An Impossible Dream?. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 20, Emerald, 2011.Pieth, Mark L. A. The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Comentary. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Pilchman, D.D. A Practices Theory of International Law (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database, 2014. UMI No. 3637749Posadas, A. Combating Corruption under International Law, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 10:345, 2000.Ronald L. Holzhacker, R. W. Development and Governance: Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia (Vol. 2). Switzerland: Springer, 2016.Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and government, International Peacekeeping, 15:3, 2008.Ryzin, D. K. Research Methods in Practice: Strategies for Decription and Causation. California: SAGE Publication, 2011.Sibery, B. P. Bribery and Corruption: Navigating the Global Risks. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Simon, Francesco D. and Zagaris, Bruce. Foreign Bribery Legislation on Developing Countries and the Role of Donor Agencies, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Center, 2014.Sirait, Ningrum N. Potensi Konvergensi Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Potential Convergence of Competition Law). Limited Discussion KPPU, Jakarta, 28 Maret 2016.Stoitchkova, D. Towards Corporate Liability in International Criminal Law. Netherland: Intersentia, 2010.Susanti, Dwi. et all. Training Module Handling Cases of Corruption The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). KPK, limited publication, Jakarta: November 2018.Rotchanakitumnuai, S. The governance evidence of e- government procurement,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy , vol. 7, no. 3, at. 309–321, 2013.Tracy, S. J. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Widyawati, A. Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jakarta Timur, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika, 2014.Yukins, G. M. Integrity and Efficiency in Sustainable Public Contracts: Balancing Corruption Concerns in Public Procurement Internationally. Brussel: Bruylant, 2014.Regulations and International Organization PublicationAfrican Union 2003, African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption, 11 July 2003, available at: http://www.africa-union.org.EU 1997a, Convention drawn on the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union on the fight against Corruption involving Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of the European Union (OJ C195, 25 June 1997, 2:11).EU 1997b, Protocol drawn on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Interpretation, by way of Preliminary Rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (OJ C151, 20 May 1997, 2:14).EU 1997c, Explanatory Report on the Second Protocol drawn on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests, text approved by the Council on 19 December 1997 (OJ C11, 15 January 1998, 8).EU 1998a, Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines Imposed pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65(5) of the ECSC Treaty (OJ C9, 14 January 1998, 3).EU 2005b, Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the Fight against Organised Crime, 19 January 2005 (COM (2005) 6 final).FCPA 1977, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Pub.L.No. 95-213, 91 Stat. 1494).FCPA 1988, The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act 1988, Pub.L.No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107 (3 August 1988).FCPA 1998, International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, Pub.L.No. 105-366, 112 Stat. 3302 (10 November 1998).GRECO 1999, Resolution (99)5 establishing the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) (adopted 1 May 1999).ICC 2005, International Chamber of Commerce, Rules of Conduct and Recommendations on Combating Extortion and Bribery in International Business Transactions (first adopted 1977, revised 2005).Indonesia Republic 1948, Law No. 1 year 1946 on Criminal Code.Indonesia Republic 1981, Law No. 8 year 1981 on Criminal Procedure.Indonesia Republic 1999, Law No. 31 year 1999 on Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Indonesian Law No. 20 year 2001.Indonesia Republic 2002, Law No. 30 year 2002 on Corruption Eradication CommissionIndonesia Republic 2009, Law No. 46 year 2009 on Corruption Court.Indonesia Republic 2010, Presidential Regulation No. 54 year 2010 on Public Procurement of Goods and Service.Indonesia Republic 2018, Presidential Regulation No. 16 year 2018 on Public Procurement of Goods and Service.OAS 1996, Inter-American Convention against Corruption (G.A/RES/1398(XXVI- O/96, 29 March 1996).OECD 1994, Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 27 May 1994).OECD 1996, Recommendation on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes of Foreign Public Officials (adopted 11 April 1996, C(96)27/FINAL).OECD 1997a, Revised Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 23 May 1997).OECD 1997b, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (adopted 21 November 1997, signed 17 December 1997).OECD 1998, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase1 (DAFFE/IME(98)17).OECD 2001b, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Text, Commentary and Clarifications, 31 October 2001 (DAFFE/IME/WPG(2000)15/FINAL).OECD 2001c, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase 2 (DAFFE/IME(2001)3).OECD 2001d, Notes by the Secretariat, The Liability of Legal Persons for Bribery Acts (DAFFE/IME/BR(2001)12).OECD 2004b, Principles of Corporate Governance, endorsed by OECD Ministers in 1999 (reviewed in 2004).OECD 2004c, Steps taken and planned Future Actions by Participating Countries to Ratify and Implement the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 12 November 2004 (DAFFE/IME/BR(2004)9/REV2).OECD 2005a, Steps taken by State Parties to Implement and Enforce the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, Submissions as of December 2005, available at: http://www.oecd.org.OECD 2005b, Trade Directorate, Trade Commission, Working Party on Export Credits and Credit Guarantees, Export Credits and Bribery: Review of Responses to the 2004 Revised Survey on Measures taken to Combat Bribery in Officially supported Export Credits, Situation as of 30 September 2005 (TD/ECG(2005)4/REV).OECD 2006a, OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Phase 2 Monitoring Information Resources, Paris.OECD 2006b, OECD WGB, The Mid-Term Study (forthcoming) (DAF/INV/BR/ WD(2005)19/FINAL).OECD 2007, Integrity in Public Procurement: Good Practices from A to Z, available at http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/38588964.pdfOECD 2008. Snapshot on Indonesia’s Public Procurement System as at June, 2007. Piloting OECD/ DAC Procurement JV Baseline Indicator (BLI) Benchmarking Methodology Version 4.OECD 2010. the Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS) version 4. available at https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/benchmarking-assessment-methodology-public-procurement-systems.htmPACI 2005, Partnering against Corruption, Principles for Countering Bribery, An Initiative of the World Economic Forum in Partnership with Transparency International and the Basel Institute on Governance.Sentencing Guidelines 1991, United States Sentencing Commission 1991, Guidelines Manual, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.Sentencing Guidelines 2004, United States Sentencing Commission 2004, Revised Guidelines Manual, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.Sentencing Guidelines 2005, United States Sentencing Commission 2005, Revised Guidelines Manual incorporated with new amendments, 1 November 2005, available at: http://www.ussc.gov.The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act 2000, Pub.L.No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (25 April 2000).Transparency International, Bribery Payer Index 2011, available at http://www.transparency.org/bpi2011Transparency International. 2011. APEC Procurement Transparency Standards in Indonesia: A work in Progress. available at https://www.coalitionforintegrity.org/archive/news/documents/IndonesiaAPECProcurementStandardsReportenglish.pdfTRACE International Inc., Global Enforcement Report 2016. US, March 2017, available at https://www.traceinternational.org/gerWorld Bank, Group Flagship Report, Doing Business 2017 Equal Opportunity for all: Economy Profile 2017 Indonesia, 14th edition, 2016, available at http://www.business-anti-corruption.org/country-profiles/east-asia-the-pacific/indonesia/snapshot.aspxWorld Trade Organization, Government Procurement Agreement, 1994, available at https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/rev-gpr-94_01_e.htm#articleXIIIUN 2000, United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (G.A/ RES/55/25, 15 November 2000).UN 2003, General Assembly Resolution (A/RES/58/422, 31 October 2003), Annex United Nations Convention Against Corruption.UN. UNCITRAL Status, available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/procurement_infrastructure/2011Model_status.htmlUN 2014. Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public ProcurementUNCITRAL. (2014). Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/procurem/ml-procurement-2011/2011-Model-Law-on-Public-Procurement-e.pdf.Vienna Convention 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 (UKTS No. 58 (1980), Cmnd 7964).WebsitesIndonesia Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption Cases by Type of Corruption, 31 December 2018, available at https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/tindak-pidana-korupsi/tpk-berdasarkan-profesi-jabatanIndonesia Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption Cases by Type of Offender, 31 December 2018, available at http://acch.kpk.go.id/berdasarkan-jenis-perkaraIndonesia Corruption Eradication Commission. Kajian Pencegahan Korupsi pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah.(Research on Corruption Prevention on Public Procurement of Goods and Service). Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengembangan KPK, Indonesia, Jakarta, 2015, available at https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/berkas/litbang/kajian-pencegahan-korupsi-pada-pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa-pemerintahLKPP. Bahan Sosialisasi Peraturan Presiden No.16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Direktorat Pengembangan Strategi dan Kebijakan Pengadaan Umum. Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Strategi dan Kebijakan LKPP, 2018, available at http://berkas.dpr.go.id/setjen/dokumen/ittama-Knowledge-Sharing-Bahan-Sosialisasi-Peraturan-Presiden-Nomor-16-Tahun-2018-tentang-Pengadaan-BarangJasa-Pemerintah-1524134653.pdfMSCI, Emerging Markets Index, February 2017, available at https://www.msci.com/emerging-marketsOECD, The State parties report on the implementation of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/countryreportsontheimplementationoftheoecdanti-briberyconvention.htmWorld Economic Forum, Global Risk Report 2007-2017, 12th edition, 2017.U4 Anti-corruption Resource Centre, available at http://www.u4.no/glossary/active-and-passive-bribery/UN, Signatories and ratification status of UNCAC as of 12 December 2016, available at further on https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.htmlWorld Bank, Gross Domestic Product Ranking 2015, available at http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdfWorld Meter, Countries in the world by population, 2017, available at http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/ zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900356 en_US
