1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 教師效能知識圖譜的可視化分析
Knowledge mapping of Teacher Effectiveness research: A visual analysis using CiteSpace
作者 呂芳綾
Lu, Fang-Lin
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng-Ta
呂芳綾
Lu, Fang-Lin
關鍵詞 教師效能
知識圖譜
可視化分析
CiteSpace
teacher effectiveness
knowledge mapping
visual analysis
CiteSpace
日期 2019
上傳時間 7-Aug-2019 17:01:39 (UTC+8)
摘要 國內近幾年對教師評鑑制度日益重視，然評鑑結果未必能全盤詮釋該教師的效能。為了窺探國際上在教師效能領域的研究，本研究透過文獻計量學之引文分析法與信息可視化法，將教師效能相關文獻資料進行統計與整理，再藉由CiteSpace軟體進行文獻計量分析可視化，以發掘教師效能之知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿，供國內相關領域研究者運用。
本研究自本校圖書館Web of Science核心合輯收錄社會科學索引(Social Sciences Citation Index,SSCI)等引文資料庫，以教師效能(teacher effectiveness)為檢索詞，進行教師效能主題文獻檢索，一共取得586篇主題文獻以及3060篇引用文獻，並採用CiteSpace軟體進行文獻共被引分析與關鍵詞共現分析，透過可視化的圖譜呈現教師效能研究的知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿。
跟據研究結果與分析，本研究之研究結論歸結如下：
一、教師效能研究的知識基礎包含：學生成就、教師流動性、數學成就、科學專業的實習教師、教師研究、教師信念以及國小教師培育。
二、教師效能研究的研究熱點包括：教學觀念的變化、融入教師效能、情緒調節能力、個別學生、兩年的變化、教師評鑑、好老師、經濟價值、動態模型、成績分配、指標、合作學習以及弱勢兒童。
三、教師效能的研究前沿為：專業發展及體育。
最後，本研究依據研究結果，針對教師效能研究之知識基礎、研究熱點、研究前沿，及可視化知識圖譜未來發展等方面，提出相關建議。
In recent years, increased attention has been devoted to teacher evaluation systems, but the evaluation results may not be able to fully interpret teacher effectiveness. To obtain a broader view on the international research in the field of teacher effectiveness, this study used citation analysis and the information visualization of bibliometrics to collate and statistically analyze the literature related to teacher effectiveness. By using the CiteSpace software program, literature measurement and analysis visualization were conducted to explore the knowledge base of teacher effectiveness, research hotspots, and research frontiers to provide future research directions.
In this study, the Social Sciences Citation Index was used from the core collection of the Web of Science database, and “teacher effectiveness” was used as the search term. A total of 586 subject documents and 3,060 citations were obtained, and CiteSpace was used for cocitation analysis and keyword co-occurrence analysis. The knowledge base, research hotspots, and research frontiers of teacher effectiveness research were presented using a visual map.
Based on the research and analysis results, the conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows:
1. The knowledge base of teacher effectiveness research includes the following: student achievement, teacher mobility, mathematics achievement, science-specialist student-teacher, teacher research, teacher beliefs, and preservice elementary teacher.
2. Hotspots in teacher effectiveness research include the following: pedagogical conceptual change, incorporating teacher effectiveness, emotion-regulation ability, individual student, two-year change, teacher evaluation, good teacher, economic value, dynamic model, grade assignment, indicator, cooperative learning, and poor children.
3. By using the word detection function of CiteSpace, this study found that the primary factors of research on teacher effectiveness are “professional development” and “physical education.”
Finally, based on the results of this study, suggestions were made for future studies in the aspects of knowledge base for teacher effectiveness, research hotspots, research frontiers, and mapping knowledge domain analysis.
參考文獻 壹、中文部分
田雅綸（2013）。國中導師對高關懷學生態度與教師效能關係之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文，台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p5f7h8
吳壁如(2000)。教師效能感之內涵分析。研習資訊，17(5)，57-66。
吳壁如(2002)。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊雙月刊，10(2)，45-64。
李杰(2015)。安全科學知識圖譜導論。北京：化學工業出版社。
李杰(2017)。科學計量與知識網絡分析：基于BibExcel等軟件的實踐。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李杰(2018)。科學計量與知識網絡分析方法與實踐(第二版)。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李杰、陳超美(2017)。CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可視化(第二版)。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李慧芬（2008）。高雄市國中教師角色壓力、情緒管理與教師效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a26dr5
肖明（2017）。圖書館學情報學知識圖譜研究：理論、方法與應用。北京：中國書籍出版社。
侯劍華（2016）。知識計量與可視化：原理、方法及應用。北京：科學出版社。
姜飛月(2005)。學校變革中的教師效能。南京師範大學，教育科學學院，基礎心理學，南京。
孫志麟(1991)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係-實徵取向的分析。國立台北師範學院學報，14，109-140。
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34(2)，139-156。
孫志麟(2009)。建立信心：教師自我效能七部曲。台北市，學富文化。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，台北市。
陳木金(2006)。從教師效能來塑造良師典範的師道精神。師友月刊，463，8-16。
陳正義（2004）。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師之學校績效責任信念與教師效能關係之研究。國立新竹教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，新竹市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/428sw7
陳悅、陳超美等(2014)。引文空間分析原理與應用—CiteSpace實用指南。北京：科學出版社。
陳超美著、陳悅等譯(2014)。科學前沿圖譜知識可視化探索(第二版)。北京：科學出版社。
陳俊瑋（2009）。國中教師自我效能感與集體效能感的關係：階層線性模式應用。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8ew9y4
黃彥和（2005）。國民小學教師集體效能感之研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kc69fy
楊思洛等（2018）。中外圖書情報學科知識圖譜比較研究。北京：科學出版社。
張宇樑(2011)。從教師效能感之循環發展理論談如何提升教師效能感。教育研究月刊，206，093-104。
張弘奇（2010）。學習型組織與教師效能關係之研究－以臺中地區國小教師為例。中臺科技大學文教事業經營研究所碩士論文，台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bveu9v
粘家綺（2016）。臺北市國民中學教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係之研究。臺北市立大學教育行政與評鑑研究所教育行政碩士學位在職專班碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/28zxn5
劉則淵、陳悅、侯海燕等（2008）。科學知識圖譜方法與應用。北京：人民出版社。
劉密(2011)。美國教師效能理論研究。河北大學，教育學，比較教育學，河北省。
蕭蒂雯（2012）。國民小學教師文化與教師集體效能感關係之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所碩士論文，嘉義市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vayxgr
賴冠儒（2013）。國民小學校長道德領導對教師集體效能影響之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文，南投縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p2t532
顏淑惠（2000）。國民小學教師情緒管理與教師效能之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9794n8

貳、英文部分
Ashton, P. T. (1983). A Study of Teachers` Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Executive Summary.
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28–32.
Ashton, Patricia,(1984).Teachers` Sense of Efficacy: A Self- or Norm-Referenced Construct? Florida Journal of Educational Research, v26 n1 p29-41 Fall 1984.
Ashton P.T. & Webb R.B.(1986). Making a difference: Teachers` sense of efficacy and student achievement, Longman Publishing Group
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1983). Self-efficacy determinants of anticipated fears and calamities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 464-469.
Bastian, K. C., Patterson, K. M., & Pan, Y. (2018). Evaluating teacher preparation programs with teacher evaluation ratings: Implications for program accountability and improvement. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 429-447.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., ... & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American educational research journal, 47(1), 133-180.
Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Yoon, S., Perris, K., & Van Oostveen, R. (2003). Science-specialist student-teachers consider promoting technological design projects: Contributions of multi-media case methods. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 163-187.
Blazar, D. (2015). Effective teaching in elementary mathematics: Identifying classroom practices that support student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 48, 16-29.
Blazar, D. (2015). Grade assignments and the teacher pipeline: A low-cost lever to improve student achievement?. Educational researcher, 44(4), 213-227.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement.
Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
Brackett, M. A., Palomera, R., Mojsa‐Kaja, J., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2010). Emotion‐regulation ability, burnout, and job satisfaction among British secondary‐school teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 406-417.
Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The school years. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 190-213.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of human Resources, 41(4), 778-820.
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673-682.
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Ponitz, C. C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P. S., ... & Schatschneider, C. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 85-99.
Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). Using the dynamic model to develop an evidence-based and theory-driven approach to school improvement. Irish Educational Studies, 29(1), 5-23.
Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and teacher education, 22(3), 281-301.
Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School effectiveness and school improvement, 15(3-4), 407-442.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Donaldson, M. L. (2013). Principals’ approaches to cultivating teacher effectiveness: Constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluating, and developing teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 838-882.
Dyson, B. (2014). Quality physical education: A commentary on effective physical education teaching. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 144-152.
Ellett, C. D., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 17(1), 101-128.
Feng, L. (2010). Hire today, gone tomorrow: New teacher classroom assignments and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 5(3), 278-316.
Ferrão, M. E. (2012). On the stability of value added indicators. Quality & Quantity, 46(2), 627-637.
Fischer, C., Fishman, B., Dede, C., Eisenkraft, A., Frumin, K., Foster, B., ... & McCoy, A. (2018). Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 107-121.
Goddard, Roger, (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools, Teaching and teacher education, 17 iss:7, 807 -818.
Goldhaber, D., Cowan, J., & Theobald, R. (2017). Evaluating prospective teachers: Testing the predictive validity of the edTPA. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 377-393.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher education, 23(8), 1302-1316.
Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5-28.
Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education review, 30(3), 466-479.
Hativa, N. (2000). Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors. Instructional Science, 28(5), 491-523.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
Henry, G. T., Kershaw, D. C., Zulli, R. A., & Smith, A. A. (2012). Incorporating teacher effectiveness into teacher preparation program evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 335-355.
Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher education, 17(7), 819-836.
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School effectiveness and school improvement, 7(1), 1-34.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American educational research journal, 42(2), 371-406.
Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education review, 27(6), 615-631.
Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Journal of human Resources, 46(3), 587-613.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.
Kyriakides, L., Christoforidou, M., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2017). The impact of a three-year teacher professional development course on quality of teaching: Strengths and limitations of the dynamic approach. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 465-486.
Lee, B., Cawthon, S., & Dawson, K. (2013). Elementary and secondary teacher self-efficacy for teaching and pedagogical conceptual change in a drama-based professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 84-98.
Leigh, A. (2010). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 480-488.
Li, X., Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research− A visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 77-93.
Loeb, S., Soland, J., & Fox, L. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 457-475.
Medley, D. M., & Mitzel, H. E. (1959). Some behavioral correlates of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50(6), 239–246.
McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of educational and behavioral statistics, 29(1), 67-101.
McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. (2013). Physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 84(4), 419-430.
McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. (2014). The pill not taken: Revisiting physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 85(3), 287-292.
Musselwhite, D. J., & Wesolowski, B. C. (2018). Evaluating the Psychometric Qualities of a Rating Scale to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Lesson Plan Development in the Context of a Secondary-Level Music Performance Classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(3), 338-358.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 26(3), 237-257.
Opdenakker, M. C., Van Damme, J., De Fraine, D. F., Van Landeghem, G., & Onghena, P. (2002). The effect of schools and classes on mathematics achievement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 13(4), 399-427.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81(3), 376-407.
Paufler, N. A., & Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2016). Preparing teachers for educational renewal within current contexts of accountability: Reflecting upon John Goodlad’s twenty postulates. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 251-262.
Persson, O. (1994), The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990.J.Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 45: 31-38.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational researcher, 38(2), 109-119.
Preston, C. (2017). University-based teacher preparation and middle grades teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 102-116.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
Rink, J. E. (2013). Measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 407-418.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l`education, 51-65.
Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Education finance and policy, 4(4), 537-571.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospectus study of elementary schools.
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American educational research journal, 42(1), 3-42.
Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2007). A meta‐analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436-1460.
Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science studies, 4(1), 17-40.Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American educational research journal, 25(1), 1-30.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. Psychology Press.
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational administration quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.
Van den Noortgate, W., Opdenakker, M. C., & Onghena, P. (2005). The effects of ignoring a level in multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 281-303.
Varvarigou, M. (2016). ‘I owe it to my group members… who critically commented on my conducting’–Cooperative learning in choral conducting education. International Journal of Music Education, 34(1), 116-130.
Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational research, 73(1), 89-122.
Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational researcher, 37(8), 469-479.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
105911014
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105911014
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng-Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 呂芳綾zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lu, Fang-Linen_US
dc.creator (作者) 呂芳綾zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lu, Fang-Linen_US
dc.date (日期) 2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned 7-Aug-2019 17:01:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 7-Aug-2019 17:01:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-Aug-2019 17:01:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105911014en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125013-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 105911014zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 國內近幾年對教師評鑑制度日益重視，然評鑑結果未必能全盤詮釋該教師的效能。為了窺探國際上在教師效能領域的研究，本研究透過文獻計量學之引文分析法與信息可視化法，將教師效能相關文獻資料進行統計與整理，再藉由CiteSpace軟體進行文獻計量分析可視化，以發掘教師效能之知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿，供國內相關領域研究者運用。
本研究自本校圖書館Web of Science核心合輯收錄社會科學索引(Social Sciences Citation Index,SSCI)等引文資料庫，以教師效能(teacher effectiveness)為檢索詞，進行教師效能主題文獻檢索，一共取得586篇主題文獻以及3060篇引用文獻，並採用CiteSpace軟體進行文獻共被引分析與關鍵詞共現分析，透過可視化的圖譜呈現教師效能研究的知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿。
跟據研究結果與分析，本研究之研究結論歸結如下：
一、教師效能研究的知識基礎包含：學生成就、教師流動性、數學成就、科學專業的實習教師、教師研究、教師信念以及國小教師培育。
二、教師效能研究的研究熱點包括：教學觀念的變化、融入教師效能、情緒調節能力、個別學生、兩年的變化、教師評鑑、好老師、經濟價值、動態模型、成績分配、指標、合作學習以及弱勢兒童。
三、教師效能的研究前沿為：專業發展及體育。
最後，本研究依據研究結果，針對教師效能研究之知識基礎、研究熱點、研究前沿，及可視化知識圖譜未來發展等方面，提出相關建議。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, increased attention has been devoted to teacher evaluation systems, but the evaluation results may not be able to fully interpret teacher effectiveness. To obtain a broader view on the international research in the field of teacher effectiveness, this study used citation analysis and the information visualization of bibliometrics to collate and statistically analyze the literature related to teacher effectiveness. By using the CiteSpace software program, literature measurement and analysis visualization were conducted to explore the knowledge base of teacher effectiveness, research hotspots, and research frontiers to provide future research directions.
In this study, the Social Sciences Citation Index was used from the core collection of the Web of Science database, and “teacher effectiveness” was used as the search term. A total of 586 subject documents and 3,060 citations were obtained, and CiteSpace was used for cocitation analysis and keyword co-occurrence analysis. The knowledge base, research hotspots, and research frontiers of teacher effectiveness research were presented using a visual map.
Based on the research and analysis results, the conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows:
1. The knowledge base of teacher effectiveness research includes the following: student achievement, teacher mobility, mathematics achievement, science-specialist student-teacher, teacher research, teacher beliefs, and preservice elementary teacher.
2. Hotspots in teacher effectiveness research include the following: pedagogical conceptual change, incorporating teacher effectiveness, emotion-regulation ability, individual student, two-year change, teacher evaluation, good teacher, economic value, dynamic model, grade assignment, indicator, cooperative learning, and poor children.
3. By using the word detection function of CiteSpace, this study found that the primary factors of research on teacher effectiveness are “professional development” and “physical education.”
Finally, based on the results of this study, suggestions were made for future studies in the aspects of knowledge base for teacher effectiveness, research hotspots, research frontiers, and mapping knowledge domain analysis.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 2
第三節 名詞解釋 3
第四節 研究方法與步驟 8
第五節 研究範圍與限制 11
第二章 文獻探討 15
第一節 教師效能主題之相關研究 15
第二節 科學知識圖譜概述 24
第三章 研究設計與實施 43
第一節 研究架構 43
第二節 研究對象 44
第三節 研究工具 46
第四節 實施程序 55
第五節 資料處理 59
第四章 研究結果與討論 65
第一節 文獻共被引圖譜分析 65
第二節 關鍵詞共現圖譜 81
第三節 教師效能研究前沿分析 98
第五章 結論與建議 103
第一節 研究結論 103
第二節 研究建議 106
參考文獻 109		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4947787 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105911014en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教師效能zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識圖譜zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 可視化分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CiteSpacezh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) teacher effectivenessen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge mappingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) visual analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CiteSpaceen_US
dc.title (題名) 教師效能知識圖譜的可視化分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Knowledge mapping of Teacher Effectiveness research: A visual analysis using CiteSpaceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文部分
田雅綸（2013）。國中導師對高關懷學生態度與教師效能關係之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文，台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p5f7h8
吳壁如(2000)。教師效能感之內涵分析。研習資訊，17(5)，57-66。
吳壁如(2002)。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊雙月刊，10(2)，45-64。
李杰(2015)。安全科學知識圖譜導論。北京：化學工業出版社。
李杰(2017)。科學計量與知識網絡分析：基于BibExcel等軟件的實踐。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李杰(2018)。科學計量與知識網絡分析方法與實踐(第二版)。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李杰、陳超美(2017)。CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可視化(第二版)。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
李慧芬（2008）。高雄市國中教師角色壓力、情緒管理與教師效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a26dr5
肖明（2017）。圖書館學情報學知識圖譜研究：理論、方法與應用。北京：中國書籍出版社。
侯劍華（2016）。知識計量與可視化：原理、方法及應用。北京：科學出版社。
姜飛月(2005)。學校變革中的教師效能。南京師範大學，教育科學學院，基礎心理學，南京。
孫志麟(1991)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係-實徵取向的分析。國立台北師範學院學報，14，109-140。
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34(2)，139-156。
孫志麟(2009)。建立信心：教師自我效能七部曲。台北市，學富文化。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，台北市。
陳木金(2006)。從教師效能來塑造良師典範的師道精神。師友月刊，463，8-16。
陳正義（2004）。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師之學校績效責任信念與教師效能關係之研究。國立新竹教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，新竹市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/428sw7
陳悅、陳超美等(2014)。引文空間分析原理與應用—CiteSpace實用指南。北京：科學出版社。
陳超美著、陳悅等譯(2014)。科學前沿圖譜知識可視化探索(第二版)。北京：科學出版社。
陳俊瑋（2009）。國中教師自我效能感與集體效能感的關係：階層線性模式應用。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8ew9y4
黃彥和（2005）。國民小學教師集體效能感之研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kc69fy
楊思洛等（2018）。中外圖書情報學科知識圖譜比較研究。北京：科學出版社。
張宇樑(2011)。從教師效能感之循環發展理論談如何提升教師效能感。教育研究月刊，206，093-104。
張弘奇（2010）。學習型組織與教師效能關係之研究－以臺中地區國小教師為例。中臺科技大學文教事業經營研究所碩士論文，台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bveu9v
粘家綺（2016）。臺北市國民中學教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係之研究。臺北市立大學教育行政與評鑑研究所教育行政碩士學位在職專班碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/28zxn5
劉則淵、陳悅、侯海燕等（2008）。科學知識圖譜方法與應用。北京：人民出版社。
劉密(2011)。美國教師效能理論研究。河北大學，教育學，比較教育學，河北省。
蕭蒂雯（2012）。國民小學教師文化與教師集體效能感關係之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所碩士論文，嘉義市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vayxgr
賴冠儒（2013）。國民小學校長道德領導對教師集體效能影響之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文，南投縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p2t532
顏淑惠（2000）。國民小學教師情緒管理與教師效能之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9794n8

貳、英文部分
Ashton, P. T. (1983). A Study of Teachers` Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Executive Summary.
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28–32.
Ashton, Patricia,(1984).Teachers` Sense of Efficacy: A Self- or Norm-Referenced Construct? Florida Journal of Educational Research, v26 n1 p29-41 Fall 1984.
Ashton P.T. & Webb R.B.(1986). Making a difference: Teachers` sense of efficacy and student achievement, Longman Publishing Group
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1983). Self-efficacy determinants of anticipated fears and calamities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 464-469.
Bastian, K. C., Patterson, K. M., & Pan, Y. (2018). Evaluating teacher preparation programs with teacher evaluation ratings: Implications for program accountability and improvement. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 429-447.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., ... & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American educational research journal, 47(1), 133-180.
Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Yoon, S., Perris, K., & Van Oostveen, R. (2003). Science-specialist student-teachers consider promoting technological design projects: Contributions of multi-media case methods. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 163-187.
Blazar, D. (2015). Effective teaching in elementary mathematics: Identifying classroom practices that support student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 48, 16-29.
Blazar, D. (2015). Grade assignments and the teacher pipeline: A low-cost lever to improve student achievement?. Educational researcher, 44(4), 213-227.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement.
Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
Brackett, M. A., Palomera, R., Mojsa‐Kaja, J., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2010). Emotion‐regulation ability, burnout, and job satisfaction among British secondary‐school teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 406-417.
Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The school years. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 190-213.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of human Resources, 41(4), 778-820.
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673-682.
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Ponitz, C. C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P. S., ... & Schatschneider, C. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 85-99.
Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). Using the dynamic model to develop an evidence-based and theory-driven approach to school improvement. Irish Educational Studies, 29(1), 5-23.
Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and teacher education, 22(3), 281-301.
Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School effectiveness and school improvement, 15(3-4), 407-442.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Donaldson, M. L. (2013). Principals’ approaches to cultivating teacher effectiveness: Constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluating, and developing teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 838-882.
Dyson, B. (2014). Quality physical education: A commentary on effective physical education teaching. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 144-152.
Ellett, C. D., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 17(1), 101-128.
Feng, L. (2010). Hire today, gone tomorrow: New teacher classroom assignments and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 5(3), 278-316.
Ferrão, M. E. (2012). On the stability of value added indicators. Quality & Quantity, 46(2), 627-637.
Fischer, C., Fishman, B., Dede, C., Eisenkraft, A., Frumin, K., Foster, B., ... & McCoy, A. (2018). Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 107-121.
Goddard, Roger, (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools, Teaching and teacher education, 17 iss:7, 807 -818.
Goldhaber, D., Cowan, J., & Theobald, R. (2017). Evaluating prospective teachers: Testing the predictive validity of the edTPA. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 377-393.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher education, 23(8), 1302-1316.
Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5-28.
Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education review, 30(3), 466-479.
Hativa, N. (2000). Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors. Instructional Science, 28(5), 491-523.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
Henry, G. T., Kershaw, D. C., Zulli, R. A., & Smith, A. A. (2012). Incorporating teacher effectiveness into teacher preparation program evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 335-355.
Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher education, 17(7), 819-836.
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School effectiveness and school improvement, 7(1), 1-34.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American educational research journal, 42(2), 371-406.
Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education review, 27(6), 615-631.
Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Journal of human Resources, 46(3), 587-613.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.
Kyriakides, L., Christoforidou, M., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2017). The impact of a three-year teacher professional development course on quality of teaching: Strengths and limitations of the dynamic approach. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 465-486.
Lee, B., Cawthon, S., & Dawson, K. (2013). Elementary and secondary teacher self-efficacy for teaching and pedagogical conceptual change in a drama-based professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 84-98.
Leigh, A. (2010). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 480-488.
Li, X., Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research− A visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 77-93.
Loeb, S., Soland, J., & Fox, L. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 457-475.
Medley, D. M., & Mitzel, H. E. (1959). Some behavioral correlates of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50(6), 239–246.
McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of educational and behavioral statistics, 29(1), 67-101.
McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. (2013). Physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 84(4), 419-430.
McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. (2014). The pill not taken: Revisiting physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 85(3), 287-292.
Musselwhite, D. J., & Wesolowski, B. C. (2018). Evaluating the Psychometric Qualities of a Rating Scale to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Lesson Plan Development in the Context of a Secondary-Level Music Performance Classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(3), 338-358.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 26(3), 237-257.
Opdenakker, M. C., Van Damme, J., De Fraine, D. F., Van Landeghem, G., & Onghena, P. (2002). The effect of schools and classes on mathematics achievement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 13(4), 399-427.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81(3), 376-407.
Paufler, N. A., & Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2016). Preparing teachers for educational renewal within current contexts of accountability: Reflecting upon John Goodlad’s twenty postulates. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 251-262.
Persson, O. (1994), The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990.J.Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 45: 31-38.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational researcher, 38(2), 109-119.
Preston, C. (2017). University-based teacher preparation and middle grades teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 102-116.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
Rink, J. E. (2013). Measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 407-418.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l`education, 51-65.
Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Education finance and policy, 4(4), 537-571.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospectus study of elementary schools.
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American educational research journal, 42(1), 3-42.
Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2007). A meta‐analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436-1460.
Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science studies, 4(1), 17-40.Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American educational research journal, 25(1), 1-30.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. Psychology Press.
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational administration quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.
Van den Noortgate, W., Opdenakker, M. C., & Onghena, P. (2005). The effects of ignoring a level in multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 281-303.
Varvarigou, M. (2016). ‘I owe it to my group members… who critically commented on my conducting’–Cooperative learning in choral conducting education. International Journal of Music Education, 34(1), 116-130.
Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational research, 73(1), 89-122.
Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational researcher, 37(8), 469-479.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900394en_US