Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 提升社會福利的配送價格管制
Increasing Social Welfare through Distribution Tariff Regulation作者 張芸睿
Chang, Yun-Jui貢獻者 溫偉任
張芸睿
Chang, Yun-Jui關鍵詞 電業自由化
輸配電價格管制
垂直產品差異
提升社會福利
The electricity liberalization
Distribution tariff regulation
Vertical differentiation
Increasing social welfare日期 2019 上傳時間 5-Sep-2019 15:38:59 (UTC+8) 摘要 本文以台灣售電業現況為發想，建構一垂直產品差異之模型 。分析售電業 市場中，有一家使用較多再生能源的綠電廠商及傳統火力發為主灰電廠商，兩家會如何決定力品質並討論政府介入管制輸配價格如何影響兩廠商生產之品質決策及社會福利。結果顯示，灰電選擇最低品質的電力；綠廠商品質決策會受選擇成本及輸配費用影響，當選擇品質的成本足夠小時，綠電廠商會自動生產最高力。另外政府介入管制輸配電成本，有助於提升綠品質增加社會福利。 參考文獻 André, F. J., González, P., & Porteiro, N. (2009).Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(2), 182-194.doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002Boccard, N., & Wauthy, X. Y. (2010).Ensuring quality provision through capacity regulation under price competition. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10(1).Choi, C. J. (1992).A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(2), 229-231. doi:10.2307/2950513Fousekis, P. (2010).Quality Choices in a Vertical Structure: National Brands vs Private Labels in Grocery Retailing. Agricultural Economics Review, 11(2), 1-10.Holtedahl, P., & Joutz, F. L. (2004).Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 26(2), 201-224.Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2012).Vertical differentiation in a Cournot industry: The Porter hypothesis and beyond. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 374-380. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.001Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978).Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory, 18(2), 301-317.Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1983).Natural oligopolies. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1469-1483.鍾嘉雯（2017）。電業改革第一步：新電業法上路，綠電先行。取自： https://energymagazine.tier.org.tw/Cont.aspx?CatID=&ContID=5 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
106351009資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106351009 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 溫偉任 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張芸睿 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Yun-Jui en_US dc.creator (作者) 張芸睿 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yun-Jui en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-Sep-2019 15:38:59 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-Sep-2019 15:38:59 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Sep-2019 15:38:59 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106351009 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125499 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106351009 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文以台灣售電業現況為發想，建構一垂直產品差異之模型 。分析售電業 市場中，有一家使用較多再生能源的綠電廠商及傳統火力發為主灰電廠商，兩家會如何決定力品質並討論政府介入管制輸配價格如何影響兩廠商生產之品質決策及社會福利。結果顯示，灰電選擇最低品質的電力；綠廠商品質決策會受選擇成本及輸配費用影響，當選擇品質的成本足夠小時，綠電廠商會自動生產最高力。另外政府介入管制輸配電成本，有助於提升綠品質增加社會福利。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 1 緒論 12 模型設定 52-1 消費者 52-2 廠商 72.2.1 獨佔，售電市場未開放 72.2.2 雙佔，售電市場開放自由競爭 92.2.3 售電市場開放，輸配電費用由政府管制 123 模型結果 144 準線性效用函數下的結果 294.1 消費者 294.2 廠商 305 結論 346 參考文獻 35 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1337873 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106351009 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 電業自由化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 輸配電價格管制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 垂直產品差異 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 提升社會福利 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) The electricity liberalization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Distribution tariff regulation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Vertical differentiation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Increasing social welfare en_US dc.title (題名) 提升社會福利的配送價格管制 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Increasing Social Welfare through Distribution Tariff Regulation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) André, F. J., González, P., & Porteiro, N. (2009).Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(2), 182-194.doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002Boccard, N., & Wauthy, X. Y. (2010).Ensuring quality provision through capacity regulation under price competition. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10(1).Choi, C. J. (1992).A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(2), 229-231. doi:10.2307/2950513Fousekis, P. (2010).Quality Choices in a Vertical Structure: National Brands vs Private Labels in Grocery Retailing. Agricultural Economics Review, 11(2), 1-10.Holtedahl, P., & Joutz, F. L. (2004).Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 26(2), 201-224.Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2012).Vertical differentiation in a Cournot industry: The Porter hypothesis and beyond. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 374-380. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.001Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978).Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory, 18(2), 301-317.Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1983).Natural oligopolies. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1469-1483.鍾嘉雯（2017）。電業改革第一步：新電業法上路，綠電先行。取自： https://energymagazine.tier.org.tw/Cont.aspx?CatID=&ContID=5 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201901155 en_US
