學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 公共住宅混居之社會網絡與居住滿意度研究 -以台北市興隆公共住宅為例
The Study of Social Network and Residential Satisfaction on Mix-Swelling Public Housing -A case study of Taipei Xinglong Public Housing作者 林曉彤
Lin, Shiao-Tung貢獻者 邊泰明
Bian, Tai-Ming
林曉彤
Lin, Shiao-Tung關鍵詞 平價住宅
社會網絡
居住滿意度
Affordable Houses
Social Network
Residential Satisfaction日期 2019 上傳時間 5-Sep-2019 16:59:11 (UTC+8) 摘要 台北市政府為增加公宅數量，積極推動老舊平價住宅都更改建為公宅，對平宅住戶而言，改建後雖然可以入住新建公宅，但在平宅內原有的互助網絡卻因混居而產生變化。本研究期盼透過安康平宅都更改建為興隆公宅為案例，探究弱勢集居的平宅都更後，安康平宅原住戶及其他身分者混居的興隆公宅社會網絡情形，及影響居住滿意的情形。實證結果顯示，雖然住戶對喜歡居住興隆公宅的最重要因素為租金便宜，但網絡面的中介中心性及結構洞度數對居住滿意度為負影響，顯示處於公宅資訊流通越多、位處資訊中介重要位置的住戶，其居住滿意度反而越低。
To increase supply of public housing, the Taipei City Government is enhancing the reconstruction of old affordable houses into public houses. Although the tenants of affordable houses can move to the new public houses after the reconstruction, the original mutual aid network in the affordable housing has changed due to mixed dwelling in the new public housing. This research studies on the reconstruction case from Ankang affordable housing to Xinlong public housing. This study focuses on the situation of the public housing mixed-dwelling with the original households and other identities of Ankang tenants, and the causes that may affect the residential satisfaction. The empirical results show that the most important factor for tenants to enjoy living in a prosperous house is cheap rent. However, the betweenness centrality and structural hole degree of the network side have a negative impact on residential satisfaction. The analysis shows that the more information flows in the public housing and the more important position of the information intermediary is in, the lower of living satisfaction is reflected.參考文獻 中文參考文獻伊慶春,1985,「都市居民的鄰里滿足程度:以臺中市居民為例」,『思與言』,23(3)：303-320。林南,2001,「社會資本：爭鳴的範式和實證的檢驗」,『香港社會學學報』,2：1-38。林南,2005,『社會資本』初版,台北：弘智文化事業有限公司。林昭綾,1986, 「台北市居民社區滿意與移動意願」,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文：台中。林紫瀅,2014, 「都市公營出租住宅下的集居想像-以臺北安康社區為例」,成功大學建築學系學位論文:台南。林毓英,2006, 「台北市內湖區居民居住環境滿意度與再遷移傾向之研究」,臺北市立教育大學社會科教育研究所碩士論文：台北。師豫玲,孫淑文,陳肯玉,2008,「臺北市平價住宅問題探討、因應策略與未來發展方向」,『社區發展季刊』,121：100-119。孫青雯,1994,「台中市居民對生活環境品質認知分析」,『台灣地政』,99：42-49。財團法人臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究發展基金會,2014, 『公營住宅參與式規劃案安康總結報告』」,台北:臺北市政府都市發展局。夏鑄九主持,1991,『台北市平價住宅改建先期規劃』,臺北市政府社會局委託,台灣大學慶齡工業研究中心主辦,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所規劃室執行。陳世榮,2013,『社會網絡分析方法 UCINET應用』一版, 高雄:巨流圖書股份有限公司。陳妍如,2009,「集合住宅面積混合對社區管理維護影響之路徑分析」,國立政治大學地政系研究所碩士論文：台北。陳玫秀,2005,「都市地區居住環境品質對居民居住滿意度影響之研究」,國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文：台北。陳美燕,2012,「 社會資本的流動：以社會網絡分析觀點論我國體育運動組織之資源發展」,『中華體育季刊』,26(4),455-464。曾國雄、曹勝雄、廖耀東,1992,「臺北都會區土地使用形態與環境品質之研究」,『都市與計劃』,19（1）：33-52。趙炎、郭霞婉,2012,「結構洞對聯盟網絡中企業創新績效的影響研究」,『科技進步與對策』,29（17）：76-81。劉松癸,2002,「居住環境品質概念性模式與量表的建構」,南華大學環境管理研究所碩士論文：嘉義。劉軍,2009,『整體網分析講義』一版, 上海:格致出版社。榮泰生,2013,『UCINET在社會網絡分析(SNA)之應用』一版, 台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。羅家德,2005,『社會網絡分析講義』一版, 北京:社會科學文獻出版社。英文參考文獻Amerigo, M., and Aragones, J. I.,1997, “A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction”, Journal of Environmental Psychology ,17：47–57.Bourdieu,P.,1997, “The forms of capital”, pp.46-58,in Education, culture, economy and society, edited by A.H. Halsey,H.Launder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart Wells,Eds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Burt, R. S., 1992, The Social Structure of Competition, Nohria, N and Eccles, R. G., Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press.Coleman J.S.,1988, “Social capital in creation of human capital”, American Journal of Sociology,94：95-120.Daisy,D., 2008, “Urban Quality of Life: A Case Study of Guwahati”, Social Indicator Research,88(2):297-383.Djebuarni. R., and Al-Abed.A., 2000, “Satisfaction level with neighbourhood in low income public housing in Yemen”, Property Management, 18(4), 230–242.Freedman, J, L., 1975, Crowding and behavior, Oxford, England.Fried, M., 1982, “Residential Attachment: Sources of Residential and Community Satisfaction”, Social Issues, 38(3):107-119.Granovetter, M., 1973, “The Strength of Weak Ties”, The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.Hollingshead, A. B., and Rogler, L. H. ,1963, Attitudes Towards Slums and Public Housing Conditions in Puerto Rico, L. J. Duhl, ed: Die Urban Condition.Jacqueline, L., and Saegert,S., 1990 , From Abandonment to Hope: Community-Households in Harlem, New York: Columbia University Press.Karim, H. A., 2012, “Low cost housing environment: Compromising quality of ife? “, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,35：44-53。Kay, A., 2006, “Social capital, the social economy and community development”,Community Development Journal, 41(2), 160-173.Krackhardt, D., 1992, The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations, Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Krackhardt, D.and Hanson, J. R. 1993, “Informal networks: The company behind the charts”, Harvard Business Review, 71(4): 104-111.Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., and Marsden, P. V., 1978, “Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages”, Annual Review of Sociology, 4: 455-484.Leavitt,J.,and Saegert,S., 1990, From Abandonment to Hope: Community-Households in Harlem (Columbia History of Urban Life) ,NY: Columbia University Print.Marc, F., 1982, “Residential Attachment: Sources of Residential and Community Satisfaction”, Social Issues, 38(3):107-119.McCarthy, D.,and Saegert, S., 1978, “Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal”, Human Ecology,6(3),252-272.Maslow, A,H.,1943, “A theory of human motivation”, Psychological Review, 50(4):370-396.Mohit ,M.A ., Ibrahim, M.and Rashid, Y.R.,2010, “Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia”, Habitat International,34：18-27.Mitchell, R.E.,1971, “Some social implications of high density housing”, American Sociological Review,36:18-29.Oliver,R.L.,1981, “Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retailing Setting”, Journal of Retailing, 57: 25-48.Price, J. L., 1972, Handbook of organizational measurement, C. Health and Company, Lexington: Massachusetts.Rossi, P.H.,1955, Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility, Glencoe IL: Free Press.Putnam, R, D, 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community,New York: Touchstone.Schimitt, R. C., 1966, “Density health and social disorganization”, American institute of Planner Journal,32:38-40.Speare,A.,1974, “ Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility”, Demography, 11：173–188.Weidemann, S.,and Anderson, J. R.,1985,A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction, I. Altman and C. H. Werner, Eds, New York：Plenum Press.Wasserman, S.,and Katherine, F., 1994,Social Network Analysis.,New York:Cambridge University Press.Yancey,W,L.,1971, “Architecture, Interaction, and Social Control: The Case of a Large-Scale Public Housing Project”, Environment and Behavior,3(1),3-22.Zlutnick, S., and Altman,I.,1972, Crowding and human behaver, J. Wohlwill and D. Carson(Eds.), Washington,D.C. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系碩士在職專班
105923028資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105923028 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Bian, Tai-Ming en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林曉彤 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Shiao-Tung en_US dc.creator (作者) 林曉彤 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lin, Shiao-Tung en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-Sep-2019 16:59:11 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-Sep-2019 16:59:11 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Sep-2019 16:59:11 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105923028 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125774 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政學系碩士在職專班 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105923028 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 台北市政府為增加公宅數量，積極推動老舊平價住宅都更改建為公宅，對平宅住戶而言，改建後雖然可以入住新建公宅，但在平宅內原有的互助網絡卻因混居而產生變化。本研究期盼透過安康平宅都更改建為興隆公宅為案例，探究弱勢集居的平宅都更後，安康平宅原住戶及其他身分者混居的興隆公宅社會網絡情形，及影響居住滿意的情形。實證結果顯示，雖然住戶對喜歡居住興隆公宅的最重要因素為租金便宜，但網絡面的中介中心性及結構洞度數對居住滿意度為負影響，顯示處於公宅資訊流通越多、位處資訊中介重要位置的住戶，其居住滿意度反而越低。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) To increase supply of public housing, the Taipei City Government is enhancing the reconstruction of old affordable houses into public houses. Although the tenants of affordable houses can move to the new public houses after the reconstruction, the original mutual aid network in the affordable housing has changed due to mixed dwelling in the new public housing. This research studies on the reconstruction case from Ankang affordable housing to Xinlong public housing. This study focuses on the situation of the public housing mixed-dwelling with the original households and other identities of Ankang tenants, and the causes that may affect the residential satisfaction. The empirical results show that the most important factor for tenants to enjoy living in a prosperous house is cheap rent. However, the betweenness centrality and structural hole degree of the network side have a negative impact on residential satisfaction. The analysis shows that the more information flows in the public housing and the more important position of the information intermediary is in, the lower of living satisfaction is reflected. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究範圍及內容 5第三節 研究方法與流程 8第二章 理論與文獻回顧 11第一節 社會網絡 11第二節 居住滿意度 23第三節 小結 34第三章 台北市平價住宅概況 35第一節 平價住宅概況 35第二節 安康平價住宅概況 38第三節 興隆公共住宅概況 43第四節 小結 47第四章 研究設計 49第一節 研究概念與假說 49第二節 研究變數與問卷設計 52第三節 研究對象與限制 57第四節 實證方法 59第五章 實證分析 63第一節 敘述性統計 63第二節 社會網絡結構分析 74第三節 社會網絡與居住滿意度分析 87第四節 小結 98第六章 結論與建議 101第一節 結論 101第二節 建議 104參考文獻 107附錄一 問卷調查表 111 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4021374 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105923028 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 平價住宅 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會網絡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 居住滿意度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Affordable Houses en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Network en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Residential Satisfaction en_US dc.title (題名) 公共住宅混居之社會網絡與居住滿意度研究 -以台北市興隆公共住宅為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Study of Social Network and Residential Satisfaction on Mix-Swelling Public Housing -A case study of Taipei Xinglong Public Housing en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文參考文獻伊慶春,1985,「都市居民的鄰里滿足程度:以臺中市居民為例」,『思與言』,23(3)：303-320。林南,2001,「社會資本：爭鳴的範式和實證的檢驗」,『香港社會學學報』,2：1-38。林南,2005,『社會資本』初版,台北：弘智文化事業有限公司。林昭綾,1986, 「台北市居民社區滿意與移動意願」,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文：台中。林紫瀅,2014, 「都市公營出租住宅下的集居想像-以臺北安康社區為例」,成功大學建築學系學位論文:台南。林毓英,2006, 「台北市內湖區居民居住環境滿意度與再遷移傾向之研究」,臺北市立教育大學社會科教育研究所碩士論文：台北。師豫玲,孫淑文,陳肯玉,2008,「臺北市平價住宅問題探討、因應策略與未來發展方向」,『社區發展季刊』,121：100-119。孫青雯,1994,「台中市居民對生活環境品質認知分析」,『台灣地政』,99：42-49。財團法人臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究發展基金會,2014, 『公營住宅參與式規劃案安康總結報告』」,台北:臺北市政府都市發展局。夏鑄九主持,1991,『台北市平價住宅改建先期規劃』,臺北市政府社會局委託,台灣大學慶齡工業研究中心主辦,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所規劃室執行。陳世榮,2013,『社會網絡分析方法 UCINET應用』一版, 高雄:巨流圖書股份有限公司。陳妍如,2009,「集合住宅面積混合對社區管理維護影響之路徑分析」,國立政治大學地政系研究所碩士論文：台北。陳玫秀,2005,「都市地區居住環境品質對居民居住滿意度影響之研究」,國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文：台北。陳美燕,2012,「 社會資本的流動：以社會網絡分析觀點論我國體育運動組織之資源發展」,『中華體育季刊』,26(4),455-464。曾國雄、曹勝雄、廖耀東,1992,「臺北都會區土地使用形態與環境品質之研究」,『都市與計劃』,19（1）：33-52。趙炎、郭霞婉,2012,「結構洞對聯盟網絡中企業創新績效的影響研究」,『科技進步與對策』,29（17）：76-81。劉松癸,2002,「居住環境品質概念性模式與量表的建構」,南華大學環境管理研究所碩士論文：嘉義。劉軍,2009,『整體網分析講義』一版, 上海:格致出版社。榮泰生,2013,『UCINET在社會網絡分析(SNA)之應用』一版, 台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。羅家德,2005,『社會網絡分析講義』一版, 北京:社會科學文獻出版社。英文參考文獻Amerigo, M., and Aragones, J. I.,1997, “A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction”, Journal of Environmental Psychology ,17：47–57.Bourdieu,P.,1997, “The forms of capital”, pp.46-58,in Education, culture, economy and society, edited by A.H. Halsey,H.Launder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart Wells,Eds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Burt, R. S., 1992, The Social Structure of Competition, Nohria, N and Eccles, R. G., Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press.Coleman J.S.,1988, “Social capital in creation of human capital”, American Journal of Sociology,94：95-120.Daisy,D., 2008, “Urban Quality of Life: A Case Study of Guwahati”, Social Indicator Research,88(2):297-383.Djebuarni. R., and Al-Abed.A., 2000, “Satisfaction level with neighbourhood in low income public housing in Yemen”, Property Management, 18(4), 230–242.Freedman, J, L., 1975, Crowding and behavior, Oxford, England.Fried, M., 1982, “Residential Attachment: Sources of Residential and Community Satisfaction”, Social Issues, 38(3):107-119.Granovetter, M., 1973, “The Strength of Weak Ties”, The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.Hollingshead, A. B., and Rogler, L. H. ,1963, Attitudes Towards Slums and Public Housing Conditions in Puerto Rico, L. J. Duhl, ed: Die Urban Condition.Jacqueline, L., and Saegert,S., 1990 , From Abandonment to Hope: Community-Households in Harlem, New York: Columbia University Press.Karim, H. A., 2012, “Low cost housing environment: Compromising quality of ife? “, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,35：44-53。Kay, A., 2006, “Social capital, the social economy and community development”,Community Development Journal, 41(2), 160-173.Krackhardt, D., 1992, The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations, Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Krackhardt, D.and Hanson, J. R. 1993, “Informal networks: The company behind the charts”, Harvard Business Review, 71(4): 104-111.Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., and Marsden, P. V., 1978, “Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages”, Annual Review of Sociology, 4: 455-484.Leavitt,J.,and Saegert,S., 1990, From Abandonment to Hope: Community-Households in Harlem (Columbia History of Urban Life) ,NY: Columbia University Print.Marc, F., 1982, “Residential Attachment: Sources of Residential and Community Satisfaction”, Social Issues, 38(3):107-119.McCarthy, D.,and Saegert, S., 1978, “Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal”, Human Ecology,6(3),252-272.Maslow, A,H.,1943, “A theory of human motivation”, Psychological Review, 50(4):370-396.Mohit ,M.A ., Ibrahim, M.and Rashid, Y.R.,2010, “Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia”, Habitat International,34：18-27.Mitchell, R.E.,1971, “Some social implications of high density housing”, American Sociological Review,36:18-29.Oliver,R.L.,1981, “Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retailing Setting”, Journal of Retailing, 57: 25-48.Price, J. L., 1972, Handbook of organizational measurement, C. Health and Company, Lexington: Massachusetts.Rossi, P.H.,1955, Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility, Glencoe IL: Free Press.Putnam, R, D, 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community,New York: Touchstone.Schimitt, R. C., 1966, “Density health and social disorganization”, American institute of Planner Journal,32:38-40.Speare,A.,1974, “ Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility”, Demography, 11：173–188.Weidemann, S.,and Anderson, J. R.,1985,A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction, I. Altman and C. H. Werner, Eds, New York：Plenum Press.Wasserman, S.,and Katherine, F., 1994,Social Network Analysis.,New York:Cambridge University Press.Yancey,W,L.,1971, “Architecture, Interaction, and Social Control: The Case of a Large-Scale Public Housing Project”, Environment and Behavior,3(1),3-22.Zlutnick, S., and Altman,I.,1972, Crowding and human behaver, J. Wohlwill and D. Carson(Eds.), Washington,D.C. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900896 en_US
