1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 高職專業教室整修用後評估之研究 -以某私立高職時尚創藝中心為例
Research on the Post-occupancy evaluation of the vocational high school professional classroom renovation - A case study of a private vocational high school
作者 黃玟燕
Huang, Wen-Yen
貢獻者 湯志民
黃玟燕
Huang, Wen-Yen
關鍵詞 高職
專業教室
用後評估
Vocational high school
Professional classroom
Post-occupancy evaluation
日期 2019
上傳時間 5-Sep-2019 17:25:59 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以某私立高職專教室及其使用者為研究對象，旨在了解時尚創藝中心整修後是否發揮期待功能、使用上是否符合需求，並整合實務面使用後產生的問題，以作為日後學校建築改善及未來規劃學校建築的參考。本研究採用調查問卷及訪談為研究方法，學生問卷共發出650份、教師問卷共發出30份，得到有效問卷學生為646份、教師為26份，回收可用率為99.4%及86.7%。以獨立樣本t檢定(t-test)及單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)來進行統計檢定，本研究之結論如下：
一、師生對時尚創藝中心之整體用後評估給予高程度評價，以「空間佈置」最高。
二、師生對時尚創藝中心之「教室環境」、「教學設備」給予中高程度評價，分別以「採光照明」、「玻璃書寫板」最高，對「空間佈置」、「管理維護」、「教學使用」給予高程度評價，分別以「整體設計」「教學器具清潔」「咖啡社社團教學」最高。
三、女學生及男老師之使用評價較高，二年級學生評價較低，使用頻率愈高之學生評價愈高，非上課原因使用之學生評價較高，下課時間使用評價較高。
四、時尚創藝中心之教學器具大都符合教育部專業實習科目設備基準。

最後，本研究依據上述結果提出建議，供行政管理單位未來規劃校園建築之參考，及公、私部門推行多用途教學空間或相關專業教室的參考。
The participants of this study is the professional classroom of the private vocational high school and its users.The purpose of this study is to find out whether the professional classroom performs its expected functions after renovation, whether it meets the needs in use, and to integrate the problems arising from practical use, so as to provide reference for the future improvement of school buildings and future planning of school buildings.This study adopted questionnaire and interview as research methods, and A total of 650 questionnaires were sent out to students and 30 teachers, and 646 valid questionnaires were obtained from students and 26 from teachers. The effective response rate was 99.4% and 86.7%. The data is analyzed by t-test and One-way ANOVA, conclusions of this study are as follows :
1.Teachers and students give a high degree evaluation on the Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the professional classrooms, with "space arrangement" being the highest.
2.Teachers and students give a medium high level evaluation on the "classroom environment" and "teaching equipment" of the professional classrooms, respectively by "lighting" and "glass writing board" is the highest. Teachers and students give a high level evaluation on the " space arrangement ", "management maintenance" and "teaching" to give high degree evaluation, respectively by "integral design" , " clean teaching equipment" and "coffee club teaching" is the highest.
3.Female students and male teachers had higher use evaluation, and the second grade students had lower evaluation. The higher the frequency of use, the higher the evaluation.Students don`t use classrooms for course have higher evaluation, and students who use it after class have higher evaluation.
4.Most of the teaching equipment in the professional classrooms meet the standards of the Ministry of Education.
Finally, based on the above results, this study provides suggestions for future school building planning by administrative management units, and for public and private sectors to promote multi-purpose teaching space or related professional classrooms.
參考文獻 壹、 中文部分
王建翔、謝宏仁、賴榮平、黃士賓（2010）。既有公寓大廈更新改造診斷模式與需求－以共用部份噪音、採光照明、空氣品質、隔熱遮陽更新改造為例。建築學報，74，1-26。
朱家榮，楊美華（2006）。國立成功大學圖書館建築用後評估之研究。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，4（4），100-118。
江哲銘，蘇慧貞（2003）。室內環境品質診斷及改善補助計畫。臺北市：內政部建築研究所。
吳仁惠（2011）。建築系教學空間用後評估-以中華大學為例（未出版碩士論文）。私立中華大學，新竹市。
吳清基（2009）。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準-餐旅群。臺北市：教育部。
李婉婉（1983）。建築物用後評估簡介。建築師雜誌，9（11），33-38。
李鶯美（2006）。綜合高中美容科實習教室使用後之研究（未出版碩士論文）。私立中華大學，新竹市。
周伯丞、江哲銘、張桂鳳、郭怡君（2009）。臺灣地區室內溫熱環境改變對於課業學習及工作效率心理滿意度影響之探討。建築學報，67，25-40。
室內空氣品質管理法（2011年11月23日）。
洪耿煌（2003）。高職土木建築科實習工場使用後評估之研究（未出版碩士論文）。私立中華大學，新竹市。
高級中等教育法（2016年06月01日）。
陳怡伶（2013）。高職土木建築群教學空間用後評估與使用滿意度研究（未出版碩士論文）。私立大葉大學，彰化縣。
陳星皓，江哲銘，黃貞燕（2008）。班群教室室內物理環境綜合評估之研究－以高雄市國民小學爲例。建築學報，63，25-46。
陳昭雄（1988）。實習工場之管理與佈置。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳格理（1997）。圖書館建築與用後評估研究。大學圖書館，1（4），16-33。
湯志民（2006）。學校建築與校園規劃（第三版）。臺北市：五南。
楊世瑩（2008）。spss統計分析實務（第二版）。臺北市：旗標。
董貞吟，黃乾全，張家儒，駱怡安（2004）。大學校園音環境之現況與特色分析－以國內十所大學為例。建築與城鄉研究學報，11，55-66。
賴怡年（2017）。台灣地區高職餐飲科中餐專業教室之現況研究。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會（主編），學校建築與課程發展（366-392頁）。臺北市：中華民國學校建築研究學會。
謝明燁、陳昭宇（2011）。室內照明之照度分佈型式對空間印象的影響。建築學報，75，91-98。

貳、 西文部分
Åhlander, V. L., Rydell, R., & Löfqvist, A. (2011). Speaker`s comfort in teaching environments： voice problems in Swedish teaching staff. Journal of Voice, 25(4), 430-440.
Alfianto, I., Sulton, M., Sari, A. A., & Dardiri, A. (2018). Energy performance of the vocational high school building for the convenience of thermal and lighting comfort in Medan. AIP Conference Proceedings., 1977(1), 1-7. doi：10.1063/1.5043028
Al-Sallal, K. A. (2010). Daylighting and visual performance: evaluation of classroom design issues in the UAE. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 5(4), 201-209.
American National Standards Institute (2010). American national standard: acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, (part 1: permanent schools). New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
Amin, N. D. M., Akasah, Z. A., & Razzaly, W. (2015). Architectural evaluation of thermal comfort： Sick building syndrome symptoms in engineering education laboratories. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 19-28. doi：org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.105
Andres, J. (2018). The smart schoolhouse： Raising the intelligence of our education facilities is a smart choice. American School & University, 90(7), 24-26.
Annesi-Maesano, I., Baiz, N., Banerjee, S., Rudnai, P., Rive, S., & on behalf of the SINPHONIE Group. (2013). Indoor air quality and sources in schools and related health effects. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 16(8), 491-550.
Astolfi, A., Bottalico, P., & Barbato, G. (2012). Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 247-257.
Barrett, P., & Baldry, D. (2009). Facilities management: towards best practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Barrett, P., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Optimal learning spaces： Design implications for primary schools, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/47/43834191.pdf
Behlau, M., Zambon, F., & Madazio, G. (2014). Managing dysphonia in occupational voice users. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 22(3), 188-194.
Boarin, P., Besen, P., & Haarhoff, E. (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation of neighbourhoods： A review of the literature. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168-174.
Brattico, E., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., Alku, P., Ambrosi, L., & Monitillo, V. (2005). Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(1), 190-203.
Brennen, P. G. (2017). Experiential learning in hospitality management education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachu-setts.
Brunskog, J., Gade, A. C., Bellester, G. P., & Calbo, L. R. (2009). Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2072-2082.
Calosso, G., Puglisi, G. E., Astolfi, A., Castellana, A., Carullo, A., & Pellerey, F. (2017). A one-school year longitudinal study of secondary school teachers` voice parameters and the influence of classroom acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 1055-1066.
Caner, I., Ilten, N., & Karaoglan, A. D. (2016). Field study to analyse luminous comfort in classrooms. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 171(3), 151-165.
Cassil, B. (2018). Cut and dry: Rediscovering the value of daylighting in educational spaces. American School & University, 90(6), 16-19.
Castro-Martínez, J. A., Chavarría Roa, J., Parra Benítez, A., & González, S. (2016). Effects of classroom-acoustic change on the attention level of university students. Interdisciplinaria, 33(2), 201-214.
Chandratilake, S. R., & Dias, W. P. S. (2015). Ratio based indicators and continuous score functions for better assessment of building sustainability. Energy, 83, 137-143. doi：10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.007
Chen, Q. (2009). Ventilation performance prediction for buildings： A method overviewand recent applications. Building and Environment 44, 848-858.
Cooke, M., & Lu, Y. (2010). Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), 2059-2069.
Cutiva, C., Catherine, L., & Muñoz Sánchez, A. I. (2009). Condiciones acústicas de las aulas universitarias en una Universidad pública en Bogotá. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 55(216), 26-34.
Cutiva, L. C. C., Vogel, I., & Burdorf, A. (2013). Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors： A systematic review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46(2), 143-155.
Department for Education and the Educational Funding Agency(2015). Building bulletin 93, acoustic design of schools-performance standards. Retrieved from：https：//assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/at-tachment_data/file/400784/BB93_February_2015.pdf
Eicker, U. (2010). Cooling strategies, summer comfort and energy performance of a rehabilitated passive standard office building. Applied Energy 87, 2031-2039.
Ekren, O., Karadeniz, Z. H., Atmaca, I., Ugranli-Cicek, T., Sofuoglu, S. C., & Toksoy, M. (2017). Assessment and improvement of indoor environmental quality in a primary school. Science & Technology for the Built Environment, 23(2), 391-402. doi：10.1080/23744731.2016.1251288
Erickson, P. (2017). Do school facilities affect student learning？ (Part 1 of 3). American School & University, 90(2), 28-28.
Erickson, P. (2018a). Do school facilities affect student learning？ (Part 3 of 3). American School & University, 90(5), 29-29
Erickson, P.(2018b). Do school facilities affect student learning？ (Part 2 of 3). American School & University, 90(4), 28-28.
Fanger, P. O. (2006). What is iaq？ Indoor Air, 16(5), 328-334. doi： 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00437.x
Fay, L. L. (2018). Feeding the knowledge forward: Advancements in post-occupancy evaluation application through collaboration. In Building Performance Evaluation (pp. 295-305). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Fay, L., Carll-White, A., & Harrell, J. (2017). Coming full cycle： Linking poe findings to design application. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(3), 83-98. doi:10.1177/1937586716672856
Ferguson, M. A., Hall, R. L., Riley, A., & Moore, D. R. (2011). Communication, listening, cognitive and speech perception skills in children with auditory processing disorder (APD) or specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 211-227.
Fickes, M. (2014). How to cut the cost of your new school building. School Planning & Management, 53(12), 15-19.
Flagg-Williams, J. B., Rubin, R. L., & Aquino-Russell, C. E. (2011). Classroom soundscape. Educational and Child Psychology, 28(1), 89-99.
Flagg-Williams, J., Rubin, R. L., & Aquino-Russell, C. (2009). Using classroom sound field technology to enhance learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(8), 509-518.
Garnier, M., & Henrich, N. (2014). Speaking in noise： How does the lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise？ Co-mputer Speech & Language, 28(2), 580-597.
Godall, P., Gassull, C., Godoy, A., & Amador, M. (2015). Epidemiological voice health map of the teaching population of Granollers (Barcelona) developed from the EVES questionnaire and the VHI. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 40(4), 171-178.
Grigoreva, E. V., & Solodkova, I. M. (2015). Teaching English for undergraduate students： Motivational aspect. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1 S3), 341-345.
Hofer, N. (2008). Compilation report of the process, findings and recommendations from the false creek north post-occupancy evaluation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Janssen T., Jeremie A., & James, G. (2017). Why education infrastructure matters for learning [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http：//blogs.worldbank.org-/education/why-education-infrastructure-matters-learning
Javorček, M., & Sternová, Z. (2016). Analysis of indoor environment in classroom based on hygienic requirements. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(2), 16-22.
Karimipanah, T., Awbi, H. B., Sandberg, M., & Blomqvist, C. (2007). Investigation of air quality, comfort parameters and effectiveness for two floor level air supply systemsin classrooms. Building and Environment, 42, 647-655.
Kielb, C., Lin, S., Muscatiello, N., Hord, W., Rogers-Harrington, J., & Healy, J. (2015). Building-related health symptoms and classroom indoor air quality： A survey of school teachers in New York State. Indoor air, 25(4), 371-380. doi：10.1111/ina.12154
Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., & Meis, M. (2010). Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise and Health, 12(49), 270-282.
Kohli, S., Bandhopadhyay, M. R., & Kohli, M. K. (2015). Public private partnership in education an impactful means of promoting skill development and inclusive growth in India. Scholedge International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Allied Studies, 2(5), 21-35.
Kollie, E. (2007). School building codes： A basic guide for facility managers. School Planning & Management, 46 (12), 34-37.
Kyttä, M. (2011). SoftGIS methods in planning evaluation, In A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee & J.Woltjer (Eds.), Evaluation for sustainability and participation in planning(pp. 334-354). London, England: Routledge.
Liu, D., Zhao, F. Y., Wang, H. Q., & Rank, E. (2012). Turbulent transport of airborne pollutantsin a residential room with a novel air conditioning unit. International Journalof Refrigeration, 35 ,1455-1472.
Ljung, R., Sorqvist, P., & Hygge, S. (2009). Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children`s reading and mathematical performance. Noise and Health, 11(45), 194-198.
Lu, F. -C., & Chang, B. (2016). Role-play game-enhanced English for a specific-purpose vocabulary-acquisition framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 367-377.
Michael, F. (2014). How to cut the cost of your new school building. School Planning & Management, 53(12), 15-19.
Mott, M.S., Robinson, D.H., Walden, A., Burnette, J., & Rutherford, A.S. (2012). Illuminating the effects of dynamic lighting on student learning. Sage Journals, 2(2), 1-9.
Newman, B., Sarjou, M., & Spitzer, G. (2018). Interior excellence. American School & University, 90(9), 10-10.
Nijs, L., & Rychtáriková, M. (2011). Calculating the optimum reverberation time and absorption coefficient for good speech intelligibility in classroom design using U50. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 97(1), 93-102.
Nybacka, I., Simberg, S., Santtila, P., Sala, E., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2012). Genetic and environmental effects on vocal symptoms and their intercorrelations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 541-553.
Olivia, G. S., & Christopher, T. A. (2015). In-use monitoring of buildings： An overview and classification of evaluation methods. Energy and Buildings, 86, 176-189.
Olson, S. L., & Kellum, S. (2003). The impact of sustainable buildings on educational achievements in K-12 schools. Madison, WI: Leonardo Academy Inc.
Parker, J. L., Larson, R. R., Eskelson, E., Wood, E. M., & Veranth, J. M. (2008). Particle size distribution and composition in a mechanically ventilated school building during air pollution episodes. Indoor Air, 18, 386-393. doi：10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00539.x
Parolise, A. (2014). Building program annual operating budget for new k-middle school building project. Engineered Systems, 31(5), 20-20.
Pelegrín-García, D., Smits, B., Brunskog, J., & Jeong, C. H. (2011). Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4), 1981-1990.
Popescu, R., Istrate, A., & Cătălina, T. (2017). Impact of ventilation on the indoor particulate matter concentrations in a school. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din lasi. Sectia Constructii, Arhitectura, 63(4), 117-127.
Preiser, W. F., White, E., & Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post-occupancy evaluation. London, England: Routledge.
Pulse(2007). Train a new receptionist. Pulse, 67(18), 30-31.
Sala, E., & Rantala, L. (2016). Acoustics and activity noise in school classrooms in Finland. Applied Acoustics, 114, 252-259. doi：10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.08.009
Samad, M. H. A., Aziz, Z. A., & Isa, M. H. M. (2017). Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of school classrooms： Case study in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1892(1), 180001-1-180001-8. doi：10.1063/1.5005784
Satish, U., Mendel, M. J., Shekhar, K., Hotchi, T., Sullivan, D., Streufert, S., & Fisk, W. J. (2012). Is CO2 an indoor pollutant？ Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(12), 1671-1677. doi：10.128-9/ehp.1104789
Shariff, N. M. (2011). Reforming hospitality program of higher educational institutions. Anatolia–An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 22(1), 125-128.
Shaughnessy, R. J., Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Nevalainen, A., & Moschandreas, D. (2006). A preliminary study on the association between ventilation rates in classrooms and student performance. Indoor Air, 16(6), 465-468. doi：10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00440.x
Shield, B., Conetta, R., Cox, T., Mydlarz, C., Dockrell, J., & Connolly, D. (2013). Acoustics and noise in English secondary schools. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference 247, 5672-5678.
Simberg, S., Santtila, P., Soveri, A., Varjonen, M., Sala, E., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2009). Exploring genetic and environmental effects in dysphonia： A twin study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 153-163.
Sjödin, F., Kjellberg, A., Knutsson, A., Landström, U., & Lindberg, L. (2012). Noise exposure and auditory effects on preschool personnel. Noise & health, 14(57), 72-82.
Sparks, S. (2018). School facilities： "Heat and learning". Education Week, 37(35), 5-5.
Stephens, N. (2010). Bridging the gap between the classroom and the hospitality industry. Nutrition bulletin, 35(1), 63-64.
Stevenson, F., & Rijal, H. B. (2010). Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 549-563.
Tregenza, P., & Mardaljevic, J. (2018). Daylighting buildings： Standards and the needs of the designer. Lighting Research & Technology, 50(1), 63-79.
Wang, Y., Zhao, F. -Y., Kuckelkorn, J., Liu, D., Liu, J., & Zhang, J. -L. (2014). Classroom energy efficiency and air environment with displacement natural ventilation in a passive public school building. Energy and Buildings, 70, 258-270.
West, S. S., & Motz, L. L. (2017). Safer STEM and CTE classroom/laboratory facilities design： General guidelines. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(5), 20.
Whitling, S., Rydell, R., & Åhlander, V. L. (2015). Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice. Journal of Voice, 29(2), 13-27.
Yang, W., & Bradley, J. S. (2009). Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 922-933.
Yu, C. W. F., & Kim, J. T. (2011). Building environment assessment schemes for rating of iaq in sustainable buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 20, 5-15.
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2011). Noise on, voicing off： Speech perception deficits in children with specific language impairment. Journal of experimental child psychology, 110(3), 362-372.
Zomorodian, Z. S., Tahsildoost, M., & Hafezi, M. (2016). Thermal comfort in educational buildings： A review article. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 895-906. doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.033
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
105911024
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105911024
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 湯志民zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃玟燕zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang, Wen-Yenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 黃玟燕zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huang, Wen-Yenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Sep-2019 17:25:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Sep-2019 17:25:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Sep-2019 17:25:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105911024en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125902-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 105911024zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以某私立高職專教室及其使用者為研究對象，旨在了解時尚創藝中心整修後是否發揮期待功能、使用上是否符合需求，並整合實務面使用後產生的問題，以作為日後學校建築改善及未來規劃學校建築的參考。本研究採用調查問卷及訪談為研究方法，學生問卷共發出650份、教師問卷共發出30份，得到有效問卷學生為646份、教師為26份，回收可用率為99.4%及86.7%。以獨立樣本t檢定(t-test)及單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)來進行統計檢定，本研究之結論如下：
一、師生對時尚創藝中心之整體用後評估給予高程度評價，以「空間佈置」最高。
二、師生對時尚創藝中心之「教室環境」、「教學設備」給予中高程度評價，分別以「採光照明」、「玻璃書寫板」最高，對「空間佈置」、「管理維護」、「教學使用」給予高程度評價，分別以「整體設計」「教學器具清潔」「咖啡社社團教學」最高。
三、女學生及男老師之使用評價較高，二年級學生評價較低，使用頻率愈高之學生評價愈高，非上課原因使用之學生評價較高，下課時間使用評價較高。
四、時尚創藝中心之教學器具大都符合教育部專業實習科目設備基準。

最後，本研究依據上述結果提出建議，供行政管理單位未來規劃校園建築之參考，及公、私部門推行多用途教學空間或相關專業教室的參考。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The participants of this study is the professional classroom of the private vocational high school and its users.The purpose of this study is to find out whether the professional classroom performs its expected functions after renovation, whether it meets the needs in use, and to integrate the problems arising from practical use, so as to provide reference for the future improvement of school buildings and future planning of school buildings.This study adopted questionnaire and interview as research methods, and A total of 650 questionnaires were sent out to students and 30 teachers, and 646 valid questionnaires were obtained from students and 26 from teachers. The effective response rate was 99.4% and 86.7%. The data is analyzed by t-test and One-way ANOVA, conclusions of this study are as follows :
1.Teachers and students give a high degree evaluation on the Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the professional classrooms, with "space arrangement" being the highest.
2.Teachers and students give a medium high level evaluation on the "classroom environment" and "teaching equipment" of the professional classrooms, respectively by "lighting" and "glass writing board" is the highest. Teachers and students give a high level evaluation on the " space arrangement ", "management maintenance" and "teaching" to give high degree evaluation, respectively by "integral design" , " clean teaching equipment" and "coffee club teaching" is the highest.
3.Female students and male teachers had higher use evaluation, and the second grade students had lower evaluation. The higher the frequency of use, the higher the evaluation.Students don`t use classrooms for course have higher evaluation, and students who use it after class have higher evaluation.
4.Most of the teaching equipment in the professional classrooms meet the standards of the Ministry of Education.
Finally, based on the above results, this study provides suggestions for future school building planning by administrative management units, and for public and private sectors to promote multi-purpose teaching space or related professional classrooms.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 3
第三節 名詞釋義 4
第四節 研究範圍與限制 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 技術及職業教育理念 7
第二節 專業教室設計之理論探討 21
第三節 用後評估之理論 47
第四節 專業教室用後評估之相關研究 54
第三章 研究設計與實施 59
第一節 研究架構 59
第二節 研究對象 61
第三節 研究工具 64
第四節 實施程序 73
第五節 資料處理與分析 75
第四章 研究結果與分析 77
第一節 時尚創藝中心之現況 77
第二節 師生使用時尚創藝中心之現況分析 92
第三節 時尚創藝中心設備基準分析 121
第四節 訪談整理 126
第五章 結論與建議 131
第一節 結論 131
第二節 建議 138
參考文獻 145
壹、 中文部分 145
貳、 西文部分 146
附錄 157
一、 私立高職整修專業教室用後評估專家審查問卷 157
二、 專家效度意見彙整 164
三、 私立高職整修專業教室用後評估預試問卷 170
四、 私立高職整修專業教室用後評估正式問卷 177
五、 訪談大綱 183		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 5307093 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105911024en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 高職zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專業教室zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 用後評估zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Vocational high schoolen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Professional classroomen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Post-occupancy evaluationen_US
dc.title (題名) 高職專業教室整修用後評估之研究 -以某私立高職時尚創藝中心為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Research on the Post-occupancy evaluation of the vocational high school professional classroom renovation - A case study of a private vocational high schoolen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、 中文部分
王建翔、謝宏仁、賴榮平、黃士賓（2010）。既有公寓大廈更新改造診斷模式與需求－以共用部份噪音、採光照明、空氣品質、隔熱遮陽更新改造為例。建築學報，74，1-26。
朱家榮，楊美華（2006）。國立成功大學圖書館建築用後評估之研究。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，4（4），100-118。
江哲銘，蘇慧貞（2003）。室內環境品質診斷及改善補助計畫。臺北市：內政部建築研究所。
吳仁惠（2011）。建築系教學空間用後評估-以中華大學為例（未出版碩士論文）。私立中華大學，新竹市。
吳清基（2009）。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準-餐旅群。臺北市：教育部。
李婉婉（1983）。建築物用後評估簡介。建築師雜誌，9（11），33-38。
李鶯美（2006）。綜合高中美容科實習教室使用後之研究（未出版碩士論文）。私立中華大學，新竹市。
周伯丞、江哲銘、張桂鳳、郭怡君（2009）。臺灣地區室內溫熱環境改變對於課業學習及工作效率心理滿意度影響之探討。建築學報，67，25-40。
室內空氣品質管理法（2011年11月23日）。
洪耿煌（2003）。高職土木建築科實習工場使用後評估之研究（未出版碩士論文）。私立中華大學，新竹市。
高級中等教育法（2016年06月01日）。
陳怡伶（2013）。高職土木建築群教學空間用後評估與使用滿意度研究（未出版碩士論文）。私立大葉大學，彰化縣。
陳星皓，江哲銘，黃貞燕（2008）。班群教室室內物理環境綜合評估之研究－以高雄市國民小學爲例。建築學報，63，25-46。
陳昭雄（1988）。實習工場之管理與佈置。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳格理（1997）。圖書館建築與用後評估研究。大學圖書館，1（4），16-33。
湯志民（2006）。學校建築與校園規劃（第三版）。臺北市：五南。
楊世瑩（2008）。spss統計分析實務（第二版）。臺北市：旗標。
董貞吟，黃乾全，張家儒，駱怡安（2004）。大學校園音環境之現況與特色分析－以國內十所大學為例。建築與城鄉研究學報，11，55-66。
賴怡年（2017）。台灣地區高職餐飲科中餐專業教室之現況研究。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會（主編），學校建築與課程發展（366-392頁）。臺北市：中華民國學校建築研究學會。
謝明燁、陳昭宇（2011）。室內照明之照度分佈型式對空間印象的影響。建築學報，75，91-98。

貳、 西文部分
Åhlander, V. L., Rydell, R., & Löfqvist, A. (2011). Speaker`s comfort in teaching environments： voice problems in Swedish teaching staff. Journal of Voice, 25(4), 430-440.
Alfianto, I., Sulton, M., Sari, A. A., & Dardiri, A. (2018). Energy performance of the vocational high school building for the convenience of thermal and lighting comfort in Medan. AIP Conference Proceedings., 1977(1), 1-7. doi：10.1063/1.5043028
Al-Sallal, K. A. (2010). Daylighting and visual performance: evaluation of classroom design issues in the UAE. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 5(4), 201-209.
American National Standards Institute (2010). American national standard: acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, (part 1: permanent schools). New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
Amin, N. D. M., Akasah, Z. A., & Razzaly, W. (2015). Architectural evaluation of thermal comfort： Sick building syndrome symptoms in engineering education laboratories. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 19-28. doi：org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.105
Andres, J. (2018). The smart schoolhouse： Raising the intelligence of our education facilities is a smart choice. American School & University, 90(7), 24-26.
Annesi-Maesano, I., Baiz, N., Banerjee, S., Rudnai, P., Rive, S., & on behalf of the SINPHONIE Group. (2013). Indoor air quality and sources in schools and related health effects. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 16(8), 491-550.
Astolfi, A., Bottalico, P., & Barbato, G. (2012). Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 247-257.
Barrett, P., & Baldry, D. (2009). Facilities management: towards best practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Barrett, P., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Optimal learning spaces： Design implications for primary schools, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/47/43834191.pdf
Behlau, M., Zambon, F., & Madazio, G. (2014). Managing dysphonia in occupational voice users. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 22(3), 188-194.
Boarin, P., Besen, P., & Haarhoff, E. (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation of neighbourhoods： A review of the literature. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168-174.
Brattico, E., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., Alku, P., Ambrosi, L., & Monitillo, V. (2005). Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(1), 190-203.
Brennen, P. G. (2017). Experiential learning in hospitality management education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachu-setts.
Brunskog, J., Gade, A. C., Bellester, G. P., & Calbo, L. R. (2009). Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2072-2082.
Calosso, G., Puglisi, G. E., Astolfi, A., Castellana, A., Carullo, A., & Pellerey, F. (2017). A one-school year longitudinal study of secondary school teachers` voice parameters and the influence of classroom acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 1055-1066.
Caner, I., Ilten, N., & Karaoglan, A. D. (2016). Field study to analyse luminous comfort in classrooms. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 171(3), 151-165.
Cassil, B. (2018). Cut and dry: Rediscovering the value of daylighting in educational spaces. American School & University, 90(6), 16-19.
Castro-Martínez, J. A., Chavarría Roa, J., Parra Benítez, A., & González, S. (2016). Effects of classroom-acoustic change on the attention level of university students. Interdisciplinaria, 33(2), 201-214.
Chandratilake, S. R., & Dias, W. P. S. (2015). Ratio based indicators and continuous score functions for better assessment of building sustainability. Energy, 83, 137-143. doi：10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.007
Chen, Q. (2009). Ventilation performance prediction for buildings： A method overviewand recent applications. Building and Environment 44, 848-858.
Cooke, M., & Lu, Y. (2010). Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), 2059-2069.
Cutiva, C., Catherine, L., & Muñoz Sánchez, A. I. (2009). Condiciones acústicas de las aulas universitarias en una Universidad pública en Bogotá. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 55(216), 26-34.
Cutiva, L. C. C., Vogel, I., & Burdorf, A. (2013). Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors： A systematic review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46(2), 143-155.
Department for Education and the Educational Funding Agency(2015). Building bulletin 93, acoustic design of schools-performance standards. Retrieved from：https：//assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/at-tachment_data/file/400784/BB93_February_2015.pdf
Eicker, U. (2010). Cooling strategies, summer comfort and energy performance of a rehabilitated passive standard office building. Applied Energy 87, 2031-2039.
Ekren, O., Karadeniz, Z. H., Atmaca, I., Ugranli-Cicek, T., Sofuoglu, S. C., & Toksoy, M. (2017). Assessment and improvement of indoor environmental quality in a primary school. Science & Technology for the Built Environment, 23(2), 391-402. doi：10.1080/23744731.2016.1251288
Erickson, P. (2017). Do school facilities affect student learning？ (Part 1 of 3). American School & University, 90(2), 28-28.
Erickson, P. (2018a). Do school facilities affect student learning？ (Part 3 of 3). American School & University, 90(5), 29-29
Erickson, P.(2018b). Do school facilities affect student learning？ (Part 2 of 3). American School & University, 90(4), 28-28.
Fanger, P. O. (2006). What is iaq？ Indoor Air, 16(5), 328-334. doi： 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00437.x
Fay, L. L. (2018). Feeding the knowledge forward: Advancements in post-occupancy evaluation application through collaboration. In Building Performance Evaluation (pp. 295-305). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Fay, L., Carll-White, A., & Harrell, J. (2017). Coming full cycle： Linking poe findings to design application. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(3), 83-98. doi:10.1177/1937586716672856
Ferguson, M. A., Hall, R. L., Riley, A., & Moore, D. R. (2011). Communication, listening, cognitive and speech perception skills in children with auditory processing disorder (APD) or specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 211-227.
Fickes, M. (2014). How to cut the cost of your new school building. School Planning & Management, 53(12), 15-19.
Flagg-Williams, J. B., Rubin, R. L., & Aquino-Russell, C. E. (2011). Classroom soundscape. Educational and Child Psychology, 28(1), 89-99.
Flagg-Williams, J., Rubin, R. L., & Aquino-Russell, C. (2009). Using classroom sound field technology to enhance learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(8), 509-518.
Garnier, M., & Henrich, N. (2014). Speaking in noise： How does the lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise？ Co-mputer Speech & Language, 28(2), 580-597.
Godall, P., Gassull, C., Godoy, A., & Amador, M. (2015). Epidemiological voice health map of the teaching population of Granollers (Barcelona) developed from the EVES questionnaire and the VHI. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 40(4), 171-178.
Grigoreva, E. V., & Solodkova, I. M. (2015). Teaching English for undergraduate students： Motivational aspect. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1 S3), 341-345.
Hofer, N. (2008). Compilation report of the process, findings and recommendations from the false creek north post-occupancy evaluation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Janssen T., Jeremie A., & James, G. (2017). Why education infrastructure matters for learning [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http：//blogs.worldbank.org-/education/why-education-infrastructure-matters-learning
Javorček, M., & Sternová, Z. (2016). Analysis of indoor environment in classroom based on hygienic requirements. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(2), 16-22.
Karimipanah, T., Awbi, H. B., Sandberg, M., & Blomqvist, C. (2007). Investigation of air quality, comfort parameters and effectiveness for two floor level air supply systemsin classrooms. Building and Environment, 42, 647-655.
Kielb, C., Lin, S., Muscatiello, N., Hord, W., Rogers-Harrington, J., & Healy, J. (2015). Building-related health symptoms and classroom indoor air quality： A survey of school teachers in New York State. Indoor air, 25(4), 371-380. doi：10.1111/ina.12154
Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., & Meis, M. (2010). Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise and Health, 12(49), 270-282.
Kohli, S., Bandhopadhyay, M. R., & Kohli, M. K. (2015). Public private partnership in education an impactful means of promoting skill development and inclusive growth in India. Scholedge International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Allied Studies, 2(5), 21-35.
Kollie, E. (2007). School building codes： A basic guide for facility managers. School Planning & Management, 46 (12), 34-37.
Kyttä, M. (2011). SoftGIS methods in planning evaluation, In A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee & J.Woltjer (Eds.), Evaluation for sustainability and participation in planning(pp. 334-354). London, England: Routledge.
Liu, D., Zhao, F. Y., Wang, H. Q., & Rank, E. (2012). Turbulent transport of airborne pollutantsin a residential room with a novel air conditioning unit. International Journalof Refrigeration, 35 ,1455-1472.
Ljung, R., Sorqvist, P., & Hygge, S. (2009). Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children`s reading and mathematical performance. Noise and Health, 11(45), 194-198.
Lu, F. -C., & Chang, B. (2016). Role-play game-enhanced English for a specific-purpose vocabulary-acquisition framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 367-377.
Michael, F. (2014). How to cut the cost of your new school building. School Planning & Management, 53(12), 15-19.
Mott, M.S., Robinson, D.H., Walden, A., Burnette, J., & Rutherford, A.S. (2012). Illuminating the effects of dynamic lighting on student learning. Sage Journals, 2(2), 1-9.
Newman, B., Sarjou, M., & Spitzer, G. (2018). Interior excellence. American School & University, 90(9), 10-10.
Nijs, L., & Rychtáriková, M. (2011). Calculating the optimum reverberation time and absorption coefficient for good speech intelligibility in classroom design using U50. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 97(1), 93-102.
Nybacka, I., Simberg, S., Santtila, P., Sala, E., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2012). Genetic and environmental effects on vocal symptoms and their intercorrelations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 541-553.
Olivia, G. S., & Christopher, T. A. (2015). In-use monitoring of buildings： An overview and classification of evaluation methods. Energy and Buildings, 86, 176-189.
Olson, S. L., & Kellum, S. (2003). The impact of sustainable buildings on educational achievements in K-12 schools. Madison, WI: Leonardo Academy Inc.
Parker, J. L., Larson, R. R., Eskelson, E., Wood, E. M., & Veranth, J. M. (2008). Particle size distribution and composition in a mechanically ventilated school building during air pollution episodes. Indoor Air, 18, 386-393. doi：10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00539.x
Parolise, A. (2014). Building program annual operating budget for new k-middle school building project. Engineered Systems, 31(5), 20-20.
Pelegrín-García, D., Smits, B., Brunskog, J., & Jeong, C. H. (2011). Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4), 1981-1990.
Popescu, R., Istrate, A., & Cătălina, T. (2017). Impact of ventilation on the indoor particulate matter concentrations in a school. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din lasi. Sectia Constructii, Arhitectura, 63(4), 117-127.
Preiser, W. F., White, E., & Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post-occupancy evaluation. London, England: Routledge.
Pulse(2007). Train a new receptionist. Pulse, 67(18), 30-31.
Sala, E., & Rantala, L. (2016). Acoustics and activity noise in school classrooms in Finland. Applied Acoustics, 114, 252-259. doi：10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.08.009
Samad, M. H. A., Aziz, Z. A., & Isa, M. H. M. (2017). Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of school classrooms： Case study in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1892(1), 180001-1-180001-8. doi：10.1063/1.5005784
Satish, U., Mendel, M. J., Shekhar, K., Hotchi, T., Sullivan, D., Streufert, S., & Fisk, W. J. (2012). Is CO2 an indoor pollutant？ Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(12), 1671-1677. doi：10.128-9/ehp.1104789
Shariff, N. M. (2011). Reforming hospitality program of higher educational institutions. Anatolia–An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 22(1), 125-128.
Shaughnessy, R. J., Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Nevalainen, A., & Moschandreas, D. (2006). A preliminary study on the association between ventilation rates in classrooms and student performance. Indoor Air, 16(6), 465-468. doi：10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00440.x
Shield, B., Conetta, R., Cox, T., Mydlarz, C., Dockrell, J., & Connolly, D. (2013). Acoustics and noise in English secondary schools. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference 247, 5672-5678.
Simberg, S., Santtila, P., Soveri, A., Varjonen, M., Sala, E., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2009). Exploring genetic and environmental effects in dysphonia： A twin study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 153-163.
Sjödin, F., Kjellberg, A., Knutsson, A., Landström, U., & Lindberg, L. (2012). Noise exposure and auditory effects on preschool personnel. Noise & health, 14(57), 72-82.
Sparks, S. (2018). School facilities： "Heat and learning". Education Week, 37(35), 5-5.
Stephens, N. (2010). Bridging the gap between the classroom and the hospitality industry. Nutrition bulletin, 35(1), 63-64.
Stevenson, F., & Rijal, H. B. (2010). Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 549-563.
Tregenza, P., & Mardaljevic, J. (2018). Daylighting buildings： Standards and the needs of the designer. Lighting Research & Technology, 50(1), 63-79.
Wang, Y., Zhao, F. -Y., Kuckelkorn, J., Liu, D., Liu, J., & Zhang, J. -L. (2014). Classroom energy efficiency and air environment with displacement natural ventilation in a passive public school building. Energy and Buildings, 70, 258-270.
West, S. S., & Motz, L. L. (2017). Safer STEM and CTE classroom/laboratory facilities design： General guidelines. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(5), 20.
Whitling, S., Rydell, R., & Åhlander, V. L. (2015). Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice. Journal of Voice, 29(2), 13-27.
Yang, W., & Bradley, J. S. (2009). Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 922-933.
Yu, C. W. F., & Kim, J. T. (2011). Building environment assessment schemes for rating of iaq in sustainable buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 20, 5-15.
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2011). Noise on, voicing off： Speech perception deficits in children with specific language impairment. Journal of experimental child psychology, 110(3), 362-372.
Zomorodian, Z. S., Tahsildoost, M., & Hafezi, M. (2016). Thermal comfort in educational buildings： A review article. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 895-906. doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.033		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900706en_US