學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 以動態能耐觀點分析新創企業發展 ─以N公司為例
A Case Study on the Start-up Development and Formulation of Dynamic Capabilities作者 宋嫚鈴
Sung, Man-Ling貢獻者 鄭至甫
宋嫚鈴
Sung, Man-Ling關鍵詞 新創企業
動態能耐
組織成長模型
New Venture
Start-up
Dynamic capabilities
Stage of Growth日期 2019 上傳時間 5-Sep-2019 17:31:06 (UTC+8) 摘要 新經濟體系的發展下，各國掀起了創業熱潮，然而面對外在環境複雜、變化迅速的情況下，新創企業如何在其發展歷程中透過資源和能力獲得組織成長為現今需要關注的議題，而許多學者認為動態環境下，組織擁有動態能耐來更新既有組織例規和組織能力，才能建立競爭優勢(D. J. Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997; Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009)。 本研究採用個案研究法，訪問台灣目前成功進展到成長期的新創企業，並以Kazanjian (1988)提出的高科技新創成長模型和Ambrosini and Bowman (2009)的動態能耐架構作為分析架構，佐以Teece et al. (1997) and Teece (2007)等學者的動態能耐理論為分析內涵。目的為探究新創企業在不同組織階段下，其動態能耐如何形成與演變，使企業能夠產生競爭優勢。 本研究發現新創企業在創業初期，企業資源尚未健全之下，需要透過動態能耐強化既有資源與產生新的資源，使之在後續企業發展階段成為企業的核心能力，而企業的核心能力後，又會受到外在環境因子影響企業的競爭優勢與否。即便企業在某一階段不具競爭優勢，新創企業也會反省既有做法進而達到重新配置和轉化資源的能耐，在透過察覺機會能耐辨別下一個新的機會，和透過建立新的商業模型的能力建立捕捉能耐，最後當企業累積一定的核心能力後，企業在市場上佔有一定的地位，企業的競爭優勢則會相較其競爭對手來得佳。最後本研究結論有二：1.新創企業在每一組織成長階段，其動態能耐形塑過程皆不相同，其會隨著獲得與創造的資源增加，而強化內部因子對動態能耐形成之影響。2.新創企業的動態能耐在每一階段發展的強度皆不同，從重視捕捉機會能耐到察覺機會能耐和發展重新配置和轉換能力的能耐，且每一階段的能耐會受到前一階段的影響，而增強該能耐之掌握程度。
Along the development of new economy, Start-ups become popular around the world. However, in such a complex and rapidly changing environment nowadays, how start-up in its development process through the resources and capabilities to grow up and become established firms is a big issue. Many scholars believe dynamic capabilities to renew both organizational routine and organizational abilities to build organizational competitive advantage (D. J. Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997; Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009).In this study, we adopted case study as research method and interviewed a Taiwanese start-up which had already been successfully developed to their growth stage. Besides we through the Stages of Growth in Technology Based New Ventures model proposed by Kazanjian (1988) and the Dynamic capabilities framework proposed by Ambrosini and Bowman (2009) as the analysis framework, with the dynamic capability theory of Teece et al. (1997) and Teece (2007) as the analysis connotation. The purpose of research is to explore the formation and evolution of dynamic capabilities of start-up, and how dynamic capabilities renew organizational routine and organizational abilities to build competitive advantage in their different organizational stages.It found that start-up in the Conception and Development stage due to the lack of resources, so that enterprise need the dynamic capabilities to strengthen both the original resources and create new resources and abilities, which become core competence. And the core competence will be affected by the external factors affect the enterprise have the competitive advantage or not. Even if start-up in a certain stage has no competitive advantage, it will reflect on its execution and strategy and then continuous align and realign its tangible and intangible assets. Start-up through Sensing dynamic capability to identify the next new opportunities, through Seizing dynamic capability to establish new business model of capacity, and finally when core competence accumulated enough, enterprise will occupy a certain position in the market, its competitive advantage will be better than its competitors.There are two conclusions in this study below:A.In each stage of organizational growth, the formation of dynamic capabilities of start-up are totally different. With the increase of resources and abilities acquired and created, the internal factors especially the manager’s perception and leadership, technological asset, complementary asset and financial asset will strengthen the formation of dynamic capabilities.B.The dynamic capabilities of start-up vary in intensity at each stage. In the beginning enterprise need to apply Sensing dynamic capability in acquiring the technology development, and then enterprise need to through Sensing and Seizing dynamic capability to continuous adjust its business model, last Transforming dynamic capability will help product sale or market share grow up. And the dynamic capabilities of each stage will be affected by the previous stage to enhance the mastery of this capability.參考文獻 英文文獻Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025.Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.Bessant, J. R., Phelps, B., & Adams, R. (2005). External knowledge: A review of the literature addressing the role of external knowledge and expertise at key stages of business growth and development. (pp. 1-78). London: Advanced Institute of Management Research.Bierly, P. E., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(4), 368–380.Blank, S. G., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. BookBaby.Box, T. M., White, M. A., & Barr, S. H. (1994). A Contingency Model of New Manufacturing Firm Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 31–45.Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 227.Bunz, T., Casulli, L., Jones, M. V., & Bausch, A. (2017). The dynamics of experiential learning: Microprocesses and adaptation in a professional service INV. International Business Review, 26(2), 225–238.Carter, N. M., Stearns, T. M., Reynolds, P. D., & Miller, B. A. (1994). New venture strategies: Theory development with an empirical base. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 21–41.Casson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(2), 327–348.Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 5–29.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128.Collis, D. J. (1994). Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 143–152.Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. London; Chicago: Butterworths ; Aldine.DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321.Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Holanda: Butterworth-Heinemann.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.Gaibraith, J. (1982). The Stages of Growth. Journal of Business Strategy, 3(1), 70–79.Gartner, W. B. (1985). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.Gerring, J. (2004). What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.Greiner, L. E. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 55–68.Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 79–91.Harreld, J. B., O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities at IBM: Driving Strategy into Action. California Management Review, 49(4), 21–43.Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.Huang, K.-F., Dyerson, R., Wu, L.-Y., & Harindranath, G. (2015). From Temporary Competitive Advantage to Sustainable Competitive Advantage: From Temporary to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 617–636.Katila, R., Chen, E. L., & Piezunka, H. (2012). All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 116-132.Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-Based New Ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257-279.Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R. (1989). An Empirical Test of a Stage of Growth Progression Model. Management Science, 35(12), 1489–1503.Knecht, M. (2014). Diversification, industry dynamism, and economic performance: The impact of dynamic-related diversification on the multi-business firm. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S. A., & Galán, J. L. (2007). Absorptive Capacity in New Ventures: Differences Among Corporate Ventures and Independent Ventures. 27, 1-16.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J., & Short, J. C. (2007). The New Venture Innovation Process: Examining the Role of Absorptive Capacity. In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (Vol. 10, pp. 159–185).Normann, R. (1977). Management for growth. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Limited.Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. SAGE.Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Pess.Ripsas, S., & Tröger, S. (2014). Deutscher Startup Monitor 2014. Berlin: KPMG Deutschland.Sandberg, W. R. (1986). New venture performance: The role of strategy and industry structure. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Singh, R. P. (2000). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks. Psychology PressStorey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26(9), 933–946.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.Teece, David J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.Teece, David J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.Teece, David J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352.Thakur, S. P. (1999). Size of investment, opportunity choice and human resources in new venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 283–309.Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73–86.Vesper, K. H. (1990). New Venture Strategies. Prentice-Hall.Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 SPEC ISS.), 991–995.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. 中文文獻Babbie, E. R.（2016）。社會科學研究方法（The Practice of Social Research 14/E）（林秀雲譯）。台北市：雙葉書廊。Patten, M. L.（2015）。研究方法（二版）（Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials, 9e）（馬藹屏、莊美玲、黃倩儀、李皓鈞、吳百祿譯）。臺北市: 禾楓書局。RIC. （2018）。日本IoT路由器／閘道器發展現況與議題分析。上網日期：2019年6月10日，檢自：https://mic.iii.org.tw/AISP/ReportS.aspx?id=CDOC20180417001MIC 無線通訊研究團隊（2013）。中國聯通物聯網服務發展分析。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。方復權（2011）。二次大戰後台灣國際新創企業發展之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班，臺中市。行政院農業委員會（2002）。農業智財事業之創投與育成。上網時間：2019年6月8日，檢自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=4100&print=Y巫立宇（2007）。企業內部程序、資源位置和過去路徑對企業營運影響之研究（行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫，No. 10.6141/TW-SRDA-E93002-1）臺北市：國立臺北商業技術學院國際商務系。台灣經濟發展研究院（2018）。【創業投資趨勢觀測系列】圖解2017全球創投市場趨。FINDIT:台灣經濟發展研究院。余紅劍、豐嘉強、金慧（2017）。知識視角的新創企業動態能力提升研究。齊齊哈爾大學學報，11，48–51。吳元熙（2017）。被日本能源專家看中，台灣新創攻智慧電表，引來三大電力公司搶合作。上網時間：2019年6月11日，檢自：https://www.nextdrive.io/tw/journal_detail.php?id=100吳思華（2000）。策略九說: 策略思考的本質。臺北市：臉譜。吳梓川（2016）。新創企業創業團隊關係研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所，臺北市。吳育賢（2016）。新創企業與大型OEM/ODM系統廠之供應鏈互動—以資源觀點分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所，臺北市。吳豐祥（2002）。我國企業研發管理的典範之實證研究─以華碩電腦公司為例。科技管理學刊，7(2)，191–216。周岳霖（2017）。NextDrive與日本合作開發照護領域機器學習應用。上網時間：2019年6月11日，檢自： https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=130&cat1=20&cat2=15&id=0000518321_4T74JCYL1ANLAK2T4OLDW周鍵、王慶金（2017）。創業企業如何獲取持續性成長？基於創業動態能力的研究。科學學與科學技術管理，38(11)，128–141。胡幼慧（1996）。質性研究 : 理論.方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市：巨流。高慈薏（2015）。家庭智慧安全佈局方向及解決方案探勘。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。陳尚晏（2003）。台灣地區高科技產業實行企業電子化之策略研究─以動態能力觀點分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所，高雄市。富士Chimera總研（2016）。日本家庭網路及能源管理市場成長分析。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。曾家宏（2016）。智慧聯網趨勢下之影視音創新服務模式。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。勞勃‧殷恩（Yin, R. K.）（2011）。個案研究法（Case study research:design and methods,2nd ed.）（尚榮安譯）。臺北縣中和市：弘智文化。勞勃‧殷恩（Yin, R. K.）（2014）。質性研究: 從開始到完成（Qualitative Research from Start to Finish）（李政賢譯）臺北市：五南。童啟晟、蔡時郎（2017）。智慧家庭發展趨勢與創新應用案例分析。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。經濟部中小企業處。具創新能力之新創事業認定原則。上網時間：2019年4月29日，檢自https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=1192&CtUnit=407&BaseDSD=7&mp=1資誠聯合會計師事務所（2017）。《全球群眾募資調查報告》：種子型群眾募資成功率 女性比男性表現更佳。上網時間：2019年6月13日，檢自https://www.pwc.tw/zh/news/press-release/press-20170712.html賴宏誌（2003）。網絡關係對新創企業發展影響之研究－以台灣高科技公司為例。未出版之博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理學系，臺北市。謝如梅、劉常勇（2009）。創新機會辨識：創業警覺能力，先前知識與資訊獲取之關聯性研究。組織與管理，台灣組織與管理學會，2(2)，77–108。顏哲淵（2019）。重新想像節能生活(上) HEMS家庭能源管理系統。上網時間：2019年6月11日，檢自https://www.nextdrive.io/tw/journal_detail.php?id=134 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
1063641341資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1063641341 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 鄭至甫 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 宋嫚鈴 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Sung, Man-Ling en_US dc.creator (作者) 宋嫚鈴 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Sung, Man-Ling en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-Sep-2019 17:31:06 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-Sep-2019 17:31:06 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Sep-2019 17:31:06 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1063641341 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125926 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 1063641341 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 新經濟體系的發展下，各國掀起了創業熱潮，然而面對外在環境複雜、變化迅速的情況下，新創企業如何在其發展歷程中透過資源和能力獲得組織成長為現今需要關注的議題，而許多學者認為動態環境下，組織擁有動態能耐來更新既有組織例規和組織能力，才能建立競爭優勢(D. J. Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997; Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009)。 本研究採用個案研究法，訪問台灣目前成功進展到成長期的新創企業，並以Kazanjian (1988)提出的高科技新創成長模型和Ambrosini and Bowman (2009)的動態能耐架構作為分析架構，佐以Teece et al. (1997) and Teece (2007)等學者的動態能耐理論為分析內涵。目的為探究新創企業在不同組織階段下，其動態能耐如何形成與演變，使企業能夠產生競爭優勢。 本研究發現新創企業在創業初期，企業資源尚未健全之下，需要透過動態能耐強化既有資源與產生新的資源，使之在後續企業發展階段成為企業的核心能力，而企業的核心能力後，又會受到外在環境因子影響企業的競爭優勢與否。即便企業在某一階段不具競爭優勢，新創企業也會反省既有做法進而達到重新配置和轉化資源的能耐，在透過察覺機會能耐辨別下一個新的機會，和透過建立新的商業模型的能力建立捕捉能耐，最後當企業累積一定的核心能力後，企業在市場上佔有一定的地位，企業的競爭優勢則會相較其競爭對手來得佳。最後本研究結論有二：1.新創企業在每一組織成長階段，其動態能耐形塑過程皆不相同，其會隨著獲得與創造的資源增加，而強化內部因子對動態能耐形成之影響。2.新創企業的動態能耐在每一階段發展的強度皆不同，從重視捕捉機會能耐到察覺機會能耐和發展重新配置和轉換能力的能耐，且每一階段的能耐會受到前一階段的影響，而增強該能耐之掌握程度。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Along the development of new economy, Start-ups become popular around the world. However, in such a complex and rapidly changing environment nowadays, how start-up in its development process through the resources and capabilities to grow up and become established firms is a big issue. Many scholars believe dynamic capabilities to renew both organizational routine and organizational abilities to build organizational competitive advantage (D. J. Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997; Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009).In this study, we adopted case study as research method and interviewed a Taiwanese start-up which had already been successfully developed to their growth stage. Besides we through the Stages of Growth in Technology Based New Ventures model proposed by Kazanjian (1988) and the Dynamic capabilities framework proposed by Ambrosini and Bowman (2009) as the analysis framework, with the dynamic capability theory of Teece et al. (1997) and Teece (2007) as the analysis connotation. The purpose of research is to explore the formation and evolution of dynamic capabilities of start-up, and how dynamic capabilities renew organizational routine and organizational abilities to build competitive advantage in their different organizational stages.It found that start-up in the Conception and Development stage due to the lack of resources, so that enterprise need the dynamic capabilities to strengthen both the original resources and create new resources and abilities, which become core competence. And the core competence will be affected by the external factors affect the enterprise have the competitive advantage or not. Even if start-up in a certain stage has no competitive advantage, it will reflect on its execution and strategy and then continuous align and realign its tangible and intangible assets. Start-up through Sensing dynamic capability to identify the next new opportunities, through Seizing dynamic capability to establish new business model of capacity, and finally when core competence accumulated enough, enterprise will occupy a certain position in the market, its competitive advantage will be better than its competitors.There are two conclusions in this study below:A.In each stage of organizational growth, the formation of dynamic capabilities of start-up are totally different. With the increase of resources and abilities acquired and created, the internal factors especially the manager’s perception and leadership, technological asset, complementary asset and financial asset will strengthen the formation of dynamic capabilities.B.The dynamic capabilities of start-up vary in intensity at each stage. In the beginning enterprise need to apply Sensing dynamic capability in acquiring the technology development, and then enterprise need to through Sensing and Seizing dynamic capability to continuous adjust its business model, last Transforming dynamic capability will help product sale or market share grow up. And the dynamic capabilities of each stage will be affected by the previous stage to enhance the mastery of this capability. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 中文摘要 iAbstract ii目錄 iv表目錄 vi圖目錄 vii第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究問題與目的 3第三節 論文架構 3第四節 研究缺口 5第二章 文獻回顧 6第一節 新創企業 6第二節 動態能耐 9第三節 組織成長理論 27第四節 小結 31第三章 研究方法與流程 32第一節 研究方法 32第二節 研究流程 37第三節 研究架構設計 38第四節 研究方法限制 40第四章 個案研究 41第一節 公司介紹 41第二節 公司成長階段 46第三節 公司成長階段與動態能耐之建構 50第五章 研究發現與結論建議 79第一節 研究發現 79第二節 研究結論 87第三節 研究建議 90第四節 後續研究建議 93附錄 94參考文獻 95 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2131045 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1063641341 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新創企業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 動態能耐 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織成長模型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) New Venture en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Start-up en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dynamic capabilities en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Stage of Growth en_US dc.title (題名) 以動態能耐觀點分析新創企業發展 ─以N公司為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Case Study on the Start-up Development and Formulation of Dynamic Capabilities en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文文獻Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025.Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.Bessant, J. R., Phelps, B., & Adams, R. (2005). External knowledge: A review of the literature addressing the role of external knowledge and expertise at key stages of business growth and development. (pp. 1-78). London: Advanced Institute of Management Research.Bierly, P. E., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(4), 368–380.Blank, S. G., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. BookBaby.Box, T. M., White, M. A., & Barr, S. H. (1994). A Contingency Model of New Manufacturing Firm Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 31–45.Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 227.Bunz, T., Casulli, L., Jones, M. V., & Bausch, A. (2017). The dynamics of experiential learning: Microprocesses and adaptation in a professional service INV. International Business Review, 26(2), 225–238.Carter, N. M., Stearns, T. M., Reynolds, P. D., & Miller, B. A. (1994). New venture strategies: Theory development with an empirical base. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 21–41.Casson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(2), 327–348.Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 5–29.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128.Collis, D. J. (1994). Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 143–152.Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. London; Chicago: Butterworths ; Aldine.DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321.Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Holanda: Butterworth-Heinemann.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.Gaibraith, J. (1982). The Stages of Growth. Journal of Business Strategy, 3(1), 70–79.Gartner, W. B. (1985). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.Gerring, J. (2004). What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.Greiner, L. E. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 55–68.Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 79–91.Harreld, J. B., O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities at IBM: Driving Strategy into Action. California Management Review, 49(4), 21–43.Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.Huang, K.-F., Dyerson, R., Wu, L.-Y., & Harindranath, G. (2015). From Temporary Competitive Advantage to Sustainable Competitive Advantage: From Temporary to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 617–636.Katila, R., Chen, E. L., & Piezunka, H. (2012). All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 116-132.Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-Based New Ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257-279.Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R. (1989). An Empirical Test of a Stage of Growth Progression Model. Management Science, 35(12), 1489–1503.Knecht, M. (2014). Diversification, industry dynamism, and economic performance: The impact of dynamic-related diversification on the multi-business firm. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S. A., & Galán, J. L. (2007). Absorptive Capacity in New Ventures: Differences Among Corporate Ventures and Independent Ventures. 27, 1-16.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J., & Short, J. C. (2007). The New Venture Innovation Process: Examining the Role of Absorptive Capacity. In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (Vol. 10, pp. 159–185).Normann, R. (1977). Management for growth. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Limited.Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. SAGE.Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Pess.Ripsas, S., & Tröger, S. (2014). Deutscher Startup Monitor 2014. Berlin: KPMG Deutschland.Sandberg, W. R. (1986). New venture performance: The role of strategy and industry structure. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Singh, R. P. (2000). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks. Psychology PressStorey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26(9), 933–946.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.Teece, David J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.Teece, David J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.Teece, David J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352.Thakur, S. P. (1999). Size of investment, opportunity choice and human resources in new venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 283–309.Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73–86.Vesper, K. H. (1990). New Venture Strategies. Prentice-Hall.Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 SPEC ISS.), 991–995.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. 中文文獻Babbie, E. R.（2016）。社會科學研究方法（The Practice of Social Research 14/E）（林秀雲譯）。台北市：雙葉書廊。Patten, M. L.（2015）。研究方法（二版）（Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials, 9e）（馬藹屏、莊美玲、黃倩儀、李皓鈞、吳百祿譯）。臺北市: 禾楓書局。RIC. （2018）。日本IoT路由器／閘道器發展現況與議題分析。上網日期：2019年6月10日，檢自：https://mic.iii.org.tw/AISP/ReportS.aspx?id=CDOC20180417001MIC 無線通訊研究團隊（2013）。中國聯通物聯網服務發展分析。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。方復權（2011）。二次大戰後台灣國際新創企業發展之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班，臺中市。行政院農業委員會（2002）。農業智財事業之創投與育成。上網時間：2019年6月8日，檢自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=4100&print=Y巫立宇（2007）。企業內部程序、資源位置和過去路徑對企業營運影響之研究（行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫，No. 10.6141/TW-SRDA-E93002-1）臺北市：國立臺北商業技術學院國際商務系。台灣經濟發展研究院（2018）。【創業投資趨勢觀測系列】圖解2017全球創投市場趨。FINDIT:台灣經濟發展研究院。余紅劍、豐嘉強、金慧（2017）。知識視角的新創企業動態能力提升研究。齊齊哈爾大學學報，11，48–51。吳元熙（2017）。被日本能源專家看中，台灣新創攻智慧電表，引來三大電力公司搶合作。上網時間：2019年6月11日，檢自：https://www.nextdrive.io/tw/journal_detail.php?id=100吳思華（2000）。策略九說: 策略思考的本質。臺北市：臉譜。吳梓川（2016）。新創企業創業團隊關係研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所，臺北市。吳育賢（2016）。新創企業與大型OEM/ODM系統廠之供應鏈互動—以資源觀點分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所，臺北市。吳豐祥（2002）。我國企業研發管理的典範之實證研究─以華碩電腦公司為例。科技管理學刊，7(2)，191–216。周岳霖（2017）。NextDrive與日本合作開發照護領域機器學習應用。上網時間：2019年6月11日，檢自： https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=130&cat1=20&cat2=15&id=0000518321_4T74JCYL1ANLAK2T4OLDW周鍵、王慶金（2017）。創業企業如何獲取持續性成長？基於創業動態能力的研究。科學學與科學技術管理，38(11)，128–141。胡幼慧（1996）。質性研究 : 理論.方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市：巨流。高慈薏（2015）。家庭智慧安全佈局方向及解決方案探勘。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。陳尚晏（2003）。台灣地區高科技產業實行企業電子化之策略研究─以動態能力觀點分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所，高雄市。富士Chimera總研（2016）。日本家庭網路及能源管理市場成長分析。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。曾家宏（2016）。智慧聯網趨勢下之影視音創新服務模式。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。勞勃‧殷恩（Yin, R. K.）（2011）。個案研究法（Case study research:design and methods,2nd ed.）（尚榮安譯）。臺北縣中和市：弘智文化。勞勃‧殷恩（Yin, R. K.）（2014）。質性研究: 從開始到完成（Qualitative Research from Start to Finish）（李政賢譯）臺北市：五南。童啟晟、蔡時郎（2017）。智慧家庭發展趨勢與創新應用案例分析。臺北市：資策會產業情報研究所。經濟部中小企業處。具創新能力之新創事業認定原則。上網時間：2019年4月29日，檢自https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=1192&CtUnit=407&BaseDSD=7&mp=1資誠聯合會計師事務所（2017）。《全球群眾募資調查報告》：種子型群眾募資成功率 女性比男性表現更佳。上網時間：2019年6月13日，檢自https://www.pwc.tw/zh/news/press-release/press-20170712.html賴宏誌（2003）。網絡關係對新創企業發展影響之研究－以台灣高科技公司為例。未出版之博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理學系，臺北市。謝如梅、劉常勇（2009）。創新機會辨識：創業警覺能力，先前知識與資訊獲取之關聯性研究。組織與管理，台灣組織與管理學會，2(2)，77–108。顏哲淵（2019）。重新想像節能生活(上) HEMS家庭能源管理系統。上網時間：2019年6月11日，檢自https://www.nextdrive.io/tw/journal_detail.php?id=134 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900774 en_US
