| dc.contributor | 法律系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 許恒達 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hsu, Heng-Da | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2018-05 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 4-Dec-2019 14:45:46 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 4-Dec-2019 14:45:46 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 4-Dec-2019 14:45:46 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127671 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文以一則最高法院廣受注意的實務判決為中心，討論警察開槍阻止拒捕通緝犯逃亡時，不小心致令其死亡的案例，其中關涉的議題包括「警察執法行為時可否主張正當防衛？」、「侵害行為有無應該事前或事後判定？」與「誤想防衛的法律效果為何？如何判斷是否成立過失犯？」，筆者認為這些問題都關涉我國正當防衛解釋適用問題的核心，可以透過本案判決的評釋而得到較具合理的答案。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This article focuses on a high-profile judgment of the Supreme Court and discusses a scenario in which the fugitive was shot to death by police when resisting arrest. Issues involved therein include “whether the police can assert self-defense during law enforcement”, “should the injurious act be determined in advance or afterwards,” and “what’s the legal consequence of putative self-defense? How to determine the constitution of a negligent crime?” The author opines that all of the above questions concern the core problems of how to apply and interpret “self-defense” and can be reasonably answered in light of the foregoing judgement. | |
| dc.format.extent | 110 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 月旦法學雜誌, No.276, pp.22-42 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 正當防衛 ; 誤想防衛 ; 防衛情狀 ; 依法令之行為 ; 警械使用條例 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Self Defense ; Putative Defense ; Apparent Threat of Unlawful and Immediate Violence ; Conduct Performed in Accordance With Law ; Act Governing the Use of Police Weapons | |
| dc.title (題名) | 員警槍擊拒捕通緝犯的正當防衛爭議──評最高法院105年度台非字第88號刑事判決與其歷審裁判 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Self Defense Concerning Deadly Weapon Use of Police: A Case Study of the 2016 Supreme Court Criminal Decision Taifei Zi No. 88 | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
