學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 國際合作創新的模式: 以韓國、台灣和中國為例
The patterns for international co-invention: the case of Korea, Taiwan and China作者 黃禹崴 貢獻者 李浩仲<br>李文傑
黃禹崴關鍵詞 國際合作發明專利
共同發明
國際合作創新
International co-invention patent
Joint invention
International cooperation innovation日期 2019 上傳時間 6-Dec-2019 09:21:41 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究的主要目標是描述 1980 年至 2018 年韓國、台灣、中國出現的國際合作發明的模式，希望從中了解外國公司在韓國、台灣、中國之技術發展過程中扮演的腳色。本研究使用了 USPTO 的發明人及受讓人資料進行分析。研究結果顯示發現到三個國家的合作發明專利之發明人數都是呈現上升趨勢，而中國的平均發明人數普遍更高。從專利的所有權、授權專利數分析，了解韓國、台灣偏向於主導腳色，而授權的專利數與比例也較高，而中國偏向於配角的腳色。結果表明，這三個國家選定產品的製造領域、出口實力與技術領域的發展非常相應，因此吸引國際合作產生。
The research joint ventures (RJVs) have taken the central role of the study; however, literature investigating RJVs neglected the analyses of authorship composition that may facilitate the cross border transition of cutting edge technologies. This dissertation tries to bridge the gap on international collaboration of patent applications by utilizing patent application and granted data published by United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our results show that Taiwan, Korea and China have some similar features to advance key innovations in strategic key industries concerning semiconductor or applied physics. Especially, Taiwan and Korea have been indulging in cross-border development of noticeable shares of patent applications and taken the leading role in the syndicating R&D activities. Although mainland China also conducted a rising share of international syndicating R&D projects, we do not see the leading role played by China as for the case in Taiwan and Korea. The whole rising trend of international R&D syndication shows the complementary role played by Taiwan, Korea and China in the patent applications; however, true contributions may be different in each case of ownership derivation.參考文獻 一、 中文部分童振源、蔡增家，（2007）。從雁行發展到經濟分工：從台日經濟合作看東亞經濟分工模式的轉變。國際關係學報，第二十四期。87-114。詹小洪，(2011)。走在抗擊金融危機前列的韓國。領導文萃。第10期。二、 英文部分Alnuaimi, T., Singh, J., & G. George (2012). “Not with my own: Longterm effects of cross-country collaboration on subsidiary innovation in emerging economies versus advanced economies”, Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 943–968.Babina, T. & S.T. Howell (2018). “Entrepreneurial Spillovers from Corporate R&D”, NBER Working Paper No. 25360Belenzon, S. & A. Patacconi (2013). “Innovation and firm value: An investigation of the changing role of patents 1985–2007”, Research Policy 42, 1496-1510Belenzon, S. and T. Berkovitz (2010). “Innovation in Business Groups”, Management Science, 56, 590Bercovitz, J., & M. Feldman (2011). “The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams : Composition, social networks, and geography”, Research Policy, 40(1), 81–93.Branstetter, L., Li, G. & F. Veloso (2015). “The rise of international co-invention”,The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy. 135-168.Chen, J.H., Jang, S.L. and C.H. Chang (2012). “The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: the case of China”, Scientometrics,94, 481–495De Rassenfosse, G. & A.B. Jaffe (2017). “Econometric Evidence on the R&D Depreciation Rate”, NBER Working Paper No. 23072Dorner, M. & D. Harhoff (2018). “A novel technology-industry concordance table based on linked inventor-establishment data” , Research Policy, 47, 768-781Giuliani, E., Martinelli, A. & R. Rabellotti (2016). “Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors”, World Development. 77. 192-205.Guellec, D. & B. van Pottelsberghe (2001). “The internationalisation of technology analyzed with patent data”, Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266.G. Valentini (2011). “Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and Quality”, Strategic Management, 33, 336-346Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.H. & D. Li(2018). “Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns”, The Review of Financial Studies, (31), 2553–2605Huang, M.H., Chiang, L.Y. & D.Z. Chen (2003). “Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan`s high-tech companies” , Scientometrics, 58, 489–506J.H. Wang (2007). “From technological catch-up to innovation-based economic growth: South Korea and Taiwan compared”, The Journal of Development Studies, 43:6, 1084-1104.Lee, W.H., Hsieh, C.T. and P. Wang (2016). “A Tale of Two IT Giants: Misallocation and Organizational Efficiency”, Working PaperMa, Z., & Y. Lee (2008). “ Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005” , Technovation, 28, 379–390.Zheng, J., Zhao, Z.Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D.Z. and M.H. Huang (2014). “International collaboration development in nanotechnology: A perspective of patent network analysis”, Scientometrics. 98.683-702 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
106258033資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106258033 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 李浩仲<br>李文傑 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃禹崴 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 黃禹崴 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-Dec-2019 09:21:41 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-Dec-2019 09:21:41 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Dec-2019 09:21:41 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106258033 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127728 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經濟學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106258033 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的主要目標是描述 1980 年至 2018 年韓國、台灣、中國出現的國際合作發明的模式，希望從中了解外國公司在韓國、台灣、中國之技術發展過程中扮演的腳色。本研究使用了 USPTO 的發明人及受讓人資料進行分析。研究結果顯示發現到三個國家的合作發明專利之發明人數都是呈現上升趨勢，而中國的平均發明人數普遍更高。從專利的所有權、授權專利數分析，了解韓國、台灣偏向於主導腳色，而授權的專利數與比例也較高，而中國偏向於配角的腳色。結果表明，這三個國家選定產品的製造領域、出口實力與技術領域的發展非常相應，因此吸引國際合作產生。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The research joint ventures (RJVs) have taken the central role of the study; however, literature investigating RJVs neglected the analyses of authorship composition that may facilitate the cross border transition of cutting edge technologies. This dissertation tries to bridge the gap on international collaboration of patent applications by utilizing patent application and granted data published by United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our results show that Taiwan, Korea and China have some similar features to advance key innovations in strategic key industries concerning semiconductor or applied physics. Especially, Taiwan and Korea have been indulging in cross-border development of noticeable shares of patent applications and taken the leading role in the syndicating R&D activities. Although mainland China also conducted a rising share of international syndicating R&D projects, we do not see the leading role played by China as for the case in Taiwan and Korea. The whole rising trend of international R&D syndication shows the complementary role played by Taiwan, Korea and China in the patent applications; however, true contributions may be different in each case of ownership derivation. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 表次 vi圖次 vii第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景 1第二節 研究目的 4第三節 研究架構 5第二章 文獻回顧 6第一節 常見的創新衡量與應用 6第二節 國際合作創新之回顧 8第三章 研究方法 10第一節 數據與樣本蒐集 10第二節 資料整理程序 11第四章 研究結果 12第一節 共同發明的趨勢分析 12第二節 共同發明參與人的交叉分析 18第三節 共同發明之技術領域的交叉分析 22第五章 結論與建議 25第一節 研究結論 25第二節 研究限制與建議 26參考文獻 27 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106258033 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際合作發明專利 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共同發明 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際合作創新 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) International co-invention patent en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Joint invention en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) International cooperation innovation en_US dc.title (題名) 國際合作創新的模式: 以韓國、台灣和中國為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The patterns for international co-invention: the case of Korea, Taiwan and China en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分童振源、蔡增家，（2007）。從雁行發展到經濟分工：從台日經濟合作看東亞經濟分工模式的轉變。國際關係學報，第二十四期。87-114。詹小洪，(2011)。走在抗擊金融危機前列的韓國。領導文萃。第10期。二、 英文部分Alnuaimi, T., Singh, J., & G. George (2012). “Not with my own: Longterm effects of cross-country collaboration on subsidiary innovation in emerging economies versus advanced economies”, Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 943–968.Babina, T. & S.T. Howell (2018). “Entrepreneurial Spillovers from Corporate R&D”, NBER Working Paper No. 25360Belenzon, S. & A. Patacconi (2013). “Innovation and firm value: An investigation of the changing role of patents 1985–2007”, Research Policy 42, 1496-1510Belenzon, S. and T. Berkovitz (2010). “Innovation in Business Groups”, Management Science, 56, 590Bercovitz, J., & M. Feldman (2011). “The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams : Composition, social networks, and geography”, Research Policy, 40(1), 81–93.Branstetter, L., Li, G. & F. Veloso (2015). “The rise of international co-invention”,The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy. 135-168.Chen, J.H., Jang, S.L. and C.H. Chang (2012). “The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: the case of China”, Scientometrics,94, 481–495De Rassenfosse, G. & A.B. Jaffe (2017). “Econometric Evidence on the R&D Depreciation Rate”, NBER Working Paper No. 23072Dorner, M. & D. Harhoff (2018). “A novel technology-industry concordance table based on linked inventor-establishment data” , Research Policy, 47, 768-781Giuliani, E., Martinelli, A. & R. Rabellotti (2016). “Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors”, World Development. 77. 192-205.Guellec, D. & B. van Pottelsberghe (2001). “The internationalisation of technology analyzed with patent data”, Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266.G. Valentini (2011). “Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and Quality”, Strategic Management, 33, 336-346Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.H. & D. Li(2018). “Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns”, The Review of Financial Studies, (31), 2553–2605Huang, M.H., Chiang, L.Y. & D.Z. Chen (2003). “Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan`s high-tech companies” , Scientometrics, 58, 489–506J.H. Wang (2007). “From technological catch-up to innovation-based economic growth: South Korea and Taiwan compared”, The Journal of Development Studies, 43:6, 1084-1104.Lee, W.H., Hsieh, C.T. and P. Wang (2016). “A Tale of Two IT Giants: Misallocation and Organizational Efficiency”, Working PaperMa, Z., & Y. Lee (2008). “ Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005” , Technovation, 28, 379–390.Zheng, J., Zhao, Z.Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D.Z. and M.H. Huang (2014). “International collaboration development in nanotechnology: A perspective of patent network analysis”, Scientometrics. 98.683-702 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201901244 en_US
