Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 類創作音樂APP之使用者經驗分析與體驗評價 ─以智慧型手機為例
Experience Analysis and Experience Assessment of Users of Music Creation Assistant Apps—Taking Smartphones as an Example作者 張茜茹
Chang, Chien-Ju貢獻者 陳聖智<br>沈錳坤
Chen, Sheng-Chih<br>Shan, Man-Kwan
張茜茹
Chang, Chien-Ju關鍵詞 數位音樂
數位內容
魅力因子
使用者經驗
體驗設計
體驗評價
Digital music
Digital content
Charm factors
User experience
Experience design
Experience assessmen日期 2013 上傳時間 6-Dec-2019 09:26:24 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著資訊時代來臨，帶動產業自動化、數位化的經濟發展，然而音樂產業在數位化與網路普及的衝擊之下，產值下降。而面臨科技數位快速演進的趨勢之下，音樂產業必須重新思考如何順應此趨勢，且能運用科技擴充數位音樂的附加價值，成為音樂工作者當前的重大課題。21世紀全球進入體驗經濟時代，大眾消費型態由理性消費轉向感性消費的型態，對於產品消費的需求，已從使用性功能面的基本需求，轉為心理上情感滿足的想望。本研究的目的在於探討如何透過科技設計具魅力的音樂體驗，以智慧型手機「類創作音樂APP」為例，應用於數位音樂加值內容的創意上，創造音樂互動產品的價值。研究結果可供相關產品研發設計人員、相關產業數位內容開發者，作為未來開發或改良相關產品的參考依據。研究方法主要透過專家訪談、結合魅力工學EGM評價構造法，進行使用者互動經驗的深入觀察和5W2H分析法分析使用者經驗及需求、萃取魅力因素，並建立魅力評價構造圖；再以魅力評價構造圖作為問卷設計依據，進行高涉入者問卷調查，以驗證質性分析結果，包含八大魅力構造（上位抽象評價感受／中位原始評價理由／下位具體評價事項）說明如下：「友善親和感（安全感）／介面設計之易用性／介面直覺簡單明瞭好操作」、「趣味感／互動與回饋之可玩性／需要一點技巧又不會太難」、「悅聽愉悅感／音樂設計之音樂性／個人喜愛的音樂類型」、「風格化/整體感／設計美感／介面質感好，圖案設計精緻」、「容易操控／創作自由度之可創作性／可創作的素材豐富多樣、愈多愈好」、「操作流暢感（友善的）／創作方式／創作規則清楚簡單、容易上手又不單調」、「愉悅（趣味）感／使用目的之實用性／放鬆娛樂（打發時間、陶冶身心、當樂器玩、能演出喜愛歌手的歌曲、享受創作樂趣、角色扮演等）」、「趣味感／社交性／可隨時隨地聽見世界各地創作的聲音」等，並結合Pine II & Gilmore（1998）提出的體驗框架理論紮根與驗證，整合建構出「類創作音樂APP」的體驗設計框架。本研究最後由問卷分析得知以下發現：（一）透過相關性分析得知原始魅力構面中的「創作方式」與「創作自由度之可創作性」、「互動與回饋之可玩性」與「音樂設計之音樂性」、「使用目的之實用性」與「社交性」呈現高度顯著相關，分析其使用經驗脈絡以提出相關設計建議；（二）從深度訪談觀察得知不同音樂經驗程度者其使用者經驗和需求略有差異，但從問卷分析驗證後未呈現顯著差異，有待日後擴大受測樣本數，且均量之各組不同音樂經驗程度者之樣本數，以作進一步驗證和分析探討。
As the information era comes, the automatic and digital economic development of industries has developed. However, under the impact of digitalization and internet popularization, the industrial value of the music industry is decreasing. Facing the rapid evolution of digital technologies, the music industry has to reconsider how to comply with such a trend. The application of technology to expand the added value of digital music has become the major subject of musicians at present.The world has entered into the era of the experience economy in the 21st century. The public consumption pattern has transformed from rational consumption to perceptual consumption. For the requirements of product consumption, the basic requirements at a functional use level have transformed to the desire for emotional satisfaction at a psychological level. The purpose of this research was to discuss how to design charming music experiences through technology. A music creation assistant smartphone app was taken as an example to apply creativity to the added value content of digital music so as to create the value of interactive music products. The research results could be used by R&D and design personnel for relevant products and by developers of digital content in relevant industries as a reference for the future development and improvement of relevant productsThe expert interview research method was mainly applied in this study. Combined with the charm engineering EGM assessment structured approach, in-depth observations of users’ interactive experiences and the 5W2H analysis method were conducted to analyze users’ experience and requirements, extract charm factors, and establish a structural map of the charm assessment. The structural map of the charm assessment was regarded as the basis of the questionnaire design to conduct a questionnaire for people with high involvement, so as to verify the qualitative analysis result. The structure of eight charm factors (upper: abstract assessment feeling; middle: original assessment reason; lower: specific assessment matters) was as follows: “sense of being friendly and amiable (sense of security)/usability of UI design/the UI should be instinct, simple, and easy to operate”; “sense of fun/playability of interaction and feedback/it should require a little skill but be not too difficult”; “sense of pleasure in listening/musicality of music design/different people’s favorite music type”; “stylization/sense of wholeness/design aesthetics/good texture of interface, delicate pattern design”; “easy control/creativity of degree of creation freedom/diversified materials for creation, the more the better”; “operational smoothness (friendly)/way of creation/clear and simple creation rules; easy to get started but not monotonous”; “sense of pleasure (interest)/practicability of use purpose/relaxation and recreation (kill time, cultivate mind and body, play as a musical instrument, be able to play the songs of favorite singers, enjoy the pleasure of creation, role play, etc.)”; and “sense of fun/sociability/be able to hear the sounds of creation from all over the world at any time”. Combined with the experience frame theory proposed by Pine II & Gilmore (1999), this study integrated and constructed the experience design frame of music creation assistant apps.The questionnaire analysis made a number of findings. First, it was learned from the correlation analysis that, in the aspect of the original charm factors, there were significant correlations between “way of creation” and “creativity within the creation freedom”, “playability of interaction and feedback” and “musicality of music design”, and “practicability of use purpose” and “sociability”. The use experience context was analyzed to propose relevant design suggestions for these correlations. Second, it was known from the in-depth interviews and observations that the user experience and requirements of people with different degrees of music experience varied slightly, but no significant difference was verified by the questionnaire analysis. The sample size of the participants and amount people with different degrees of music experience in every group should be expanded in the future for further verification and analysis.參考文獻 中文文獻王鴻祥、翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑譯（2005）。Donald A. Norman著。情感設計 EmotionalDesign。台北市：田園城市出版社。王育英、梁曉鶯譯（2000）。Schmitt, B.H.著。體驗行銷 Experiential Marketing. How toGet Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, Relate to Your Company and Brands。台北市：經典傳訊文化。台灣環球唱片公司（2009）。Asahuang錄攝。2009潘瑋柏未來世界演唱會-立體浮空投影。取自：http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOo1byrQgVg。台灣唱片出版事業基金會IFPI Taiwan（2012）。台灣唱片業發展現況。台北市。取自：http://www.ifpi.org.tw/。林千惠（2009）。出國旅遊之體驗價值研究。臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所，碩士論文。林欣怡（2008）。情緒層次設計因素與手機使用者經驗：本能層次、行為層次以及反思層次。交通大學傳播研究所。碩士論文。吳尚翰（2007）。以體驗觀點探討消費者與數位音樂產品之互動以ipod為例。雲林科技大學工業設計系，碩士論文。威治、朱詩迪、李立心譯（2017）。Derek Thompson著。引爆瘋潮：徹底掌握流行擴散與大眾心理的操作策略 Hit Makers: The Science of Popularity in an Age of Distraction。台北市：商周出版。風潮音樂（2010）。風潮音樂最新喜訊！蕭青陽設計《故事島Story Island》入圍葛萊美！。風潮秘密基地。取自：http://blog.xuite.net/wm_dsc/music/40533268。風潮音樂（2011）。歌開始的地方─泰武國小古謠傳唱。取自：http://youtu.be/LNkjQtp_hx8。洪沛然譯（2010）。Suzanne Ginsburg著。iPhone User Experience簡單法則：好感度的iPhone使用者體驗 Designing the iPhone User Experience: A User-Centered Approach to Sketching and Prototyping iPhone Apps。台北市：碁峰資訊股份有限公司。范振光（2010）。想聽音樂？走，到雲端去‧台北市：聯合晚報。馬敏元（2010）。淺談日本新產品開發之感「心」技術。工業材料雜誌，第280期，160-172。莊明振（2005）。產品設計要素對使用者情緒激發與偏好影響之模糊推論模式(I) 。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。夏業良、魯煒譯（2003）。B. Joseph Pine II．James H. Gilmore 著。體驗經濟時代 The Experience Economy。台北市：經濟新潮社。徐嘉良（2006）。使用者經驗應用於概念發想之研究，交通大學應用藝術研究所，碩士論文。陳品先（2012）。Google Chrome打造個人化互動性MV 展示HTML 5技術極限。台北市：數位時代。取自bnext.com.tw/article/15938/BN-ARTICLE-15938陳建雄譯（2009）。Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H.著。互動設計：跨越人─電腦互動 Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction。台北市：全華圖書股份有限公司。陳俊智、徐德芬（2010）。使用網路遊戲之體驗評價與偏好─以開心農場為例，台灣感性學會研討會，研討會論文。陳簾伃（2004）。體驗品質對情緒、價值、體驗滿意度、承諾及行為意圖影響之研究─以台灣現代戲劇演出為例，天主教輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。張良知（2010）。智慧型手機夯 價格將走親民風。台北市：中央社。張美惠譯（1999）。Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian著。資訊經營法則 Information Rules:A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy。台北市：時報出版。葛婷婷（2011）。賺錢？先分析使用者經驗‧創新發現誌。第34期，98。葉謹睿著（2010）。互動設計概論：後數位時代網站、介面、產品設計的原則。藝術家出版社。黃琡雅（2009）。台灣鐵道地方支線產業體驗模式之研究。東華大學科技藝術研究所，碩士論文。黃映瑀（2005）。體驗行銷、體驗價值、顧客滿意、品牌行向與行為意象關係之研究。大葉大學事業經營研究所，碩士論文。黃盈裕（2001）。顧客價值的方法目標鏈結模式之研究─以童裝之消費經驗為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所，博士論文。博報堂總和研究所（2006）。五感的時代 視、聽、嗅、味、觸覺的消費社會學（鍾霓譯)。台北市：中衛發展中心。趙三賢譯（2003）。William L. Benzon著。腦內交響曲─從認知科學與文化探討音樂的創造與聆賞 Beethoven`s Anvil: Music In Mind And Culture。台北市：商周出版社。楊宜桂、梁朝雲（2007）。台灣非流行音樂產業行銷管理之創新策略。廣告學研究，28，1－28。詹宏志（2003）。當體驗經濟來臨時。台北市：數位時代雙週刊，62期。鄧麗萍（2010）。簡單生活節 創造城市美學。台北市：財訊。鄭淑瑛、許正旺（2010）。初探百貨公司建築外觀之造形魅力因子。設計與文化學術研討會。劉家成、鄧怡莘（2004）。擷取使用者經驗之方法初探。2004國際設計論壇暨第九屆中華民國設計學會設計學術研討會。台南市：成功大學。劉蓮華譯（1988）。Buck, Percy C.著。音樂家心理學 Psychology for Musicians。台北市：五洲出版。賴逸婷（2007）。網站體驗品質評估之研究。雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系研究所，碩士論文。數位時代（2010）。APP狂潮。台北市：數位時代雙週刊，189期。羅耀宗、黃貝玲、蔡宏明譯（2009）。Don Tapscott著。N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界Grown Up Digital：How the Net Generation is Changing Your World。台北市：美商麥格羅。希爾出版。羅耀宗、蔡慧菁譯（2009）。Chris Anderson著（2009）。免費！揭開零定價的獲利秘密 Free—The Future of a Radical Price。台北市：天下文化出版社。 英文文獻Batra, R. and Ahtola O. T. (1990). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources ofConsumer Attitude. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.Buck Percy C. (1944). Psychology for Musicians. Oxford University Press.B. Joseph Pine II and James H. Gilmore (1998). Welcome to the Experience Economy.Harvard business review, Reprint 98407.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Csikszentmihalyi, M. and LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 815-822.Davies, R. (1989). The Lyre of Orphenus. Penguin Book, New York.Derek Thompson(2017). Hit Makers: The Science of Popularity in a Age of Distraction.Penguin Press.Hirschman E. C. & Holbrook M. B., (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts,Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(Summer), 92-101.Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The Natural of Customer Value: An Axiology of Services in theConsumption Experience. Service Quality: New Directions in theory and Practice, R. T. Rust and R. L. Olover(Eds.), CA: Sage Publications, 21-71.Holbrook. M. B. (1996). Special Session Summary Customer Value C a Framework ForAnalysis and Research. in NA - Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 138-142.Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research.Routledge, New York.Holbrook. M. B. (2000). The millennial consumer in the tests of our times: Experience andentertainment. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(2), 178-192.IFPI(2012), IFPI Digital Music Report 2012, http://www.ifpi.org/ .Jacob Gube(2010), What Is User Experience Design? Overview, Tools And Resources:http://uxdesign.smashingmagazine.com/2010/10/05/what-is-user-experience-design-overview-tools-and-resources/ .Janus Friis(2010). Skype and Kazaa founders launch new music service:https://www.techradar.com/in/news/internet/skype-and-kazaa-founders-launch-new-music-service-693873 .Maslow A. H. (1943). Maslow`s hierarchy of needs. A Theory of Human Motivation.Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.Mano, Haim, and Oliver, Richard L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure ofthe consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, Gainesville, 20(3),451-466.Mathwicka C., Malhotrab N. & Rigdonc E. (2011). Experiential value: conceptualization,measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39–56.Norman, D. (1999). The invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution. MIT Press.Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.Basic Books.Norris, R. T. (1941). The theory of consumer`s demand. New Haven, CT: YaleUniversityPress.Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H. (2002), Interaction Design: Beyond Human-ComputerInteraction, Wiley.Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel,Think, Act, and Relate to Your Company and Brands. The Free Press, New York.Swan, John E. and Combs, Linda J. (1976). Product Performance and ConsumerSatisfaction: A New Concept. Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 40(2), 25-33.Sheth, J. N., B. I. Newman, and Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theoryof consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.Strahilevitz, M. & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: HowWell They Work May Depens on What You Are Trying to Sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(Mar), 434-446.Suzanne Ginsburg(2010). Designing the iPhone User Experience: A User-CenteredApproach to Sketching and Prototyping iPhone Apps. Addison-Wesley Professional.Vyas, D. (2005). Aspect based model of user experience. Paper presented at the AestheticExperience workshop of HCI 2005, Edinburgh, UK. Retrieved May 26, 2007, from http://www.idc.ul.ie/aesthetics/WSpapers/Vyas2005.pdf .William Benzon(2002). Beethoven`s Anvil: Music In Mind And Culture. Basic Books. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
數位內容碩士學位學程
98462005資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098462005 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳聖智<br>沈錳坤 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Sheng-Chih<br>Shan, Man-Kwan en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張茜茹 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Chien-Ju en_US dc.creator (作者) 張茜茹 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Chien-Ju en_US dc.date (日期) 2013 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-Dec-2019 09:26:24 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-Dec-2019 09:26:24 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Dec-2019 09:26:24 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0098462005 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127747 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 數位內容碩士學位學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98462005 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著資訊時代來臨，帶動產業自動化、數位化的經濟發展，然而音樂產業在數位化與網路普及的衝擊之下，產值下降。而面臨科技數位快速演進的趨勢之下，音樂產業必須重新思考如何順應此趨勢，且能運用科技擴充數位音樂的附加價值，成為音樂工作者當前的重大課題。21世紀全球進入體驗經濟時代，大眾消費型態由理性消費轉向感性消費的型態，對於產品消費的需求，已從使用性功能面的基本需求，轉為心理上情感滿足的想望。本研究的目的在於探討如何透過科技設計具魅力的音樂體驗，以智慧型手機「類創作音樂APP」為例，應用於數位音樂加值內容的創意上，創造音樂互動產品的價值。研究結果可供相關產品研發設計人員、相關產業數位內容開發者，作為未來開發或改良相關產品的參考依據。研究方法主要透過專家訪談、結合魅力工學EGM評價構造法，進行使用者互動經驗的深入觀察和5W2H分析法分析使用者經驗及需求、萃取魅力因素，並建立魅力評價構造圖；再以魅力評價構造圖作為問卷設計依據，進行高涉入者問卷調查，以驗證質性分析結果，包含八大魅力構造（上位抽象評價感受／中位原始評價理由／下位具體評價事項）說明如下：「友善親和感（安全感）／介面設計之易用性／介面直覺簡單明瞭好操作」、「趣味感／互動與回饋之可玩性／需要一點技巧又不會太難」、「悅聽愉悅感／音樂設計之音樂性／個人喜愛的音樂類型」、「風格化/整體感／設計美感／介面質感好，圖案設計精緻」、「容易操控／創作自由度之可創作性／可創作的素材豐富多樣、愈多愈好」、「操作流暢感（友善的）／創作方式／創作規則清楚簡單、容易上手又不單調」、「愉悅（趣味）感／使用目的之實用性／放鬆娛樂（打發時間、陶冶身心、當樂器玩、能演出喜愛歌手的歌曲、享受創作樂趣、角色扮演等）」、「趣味感／社交性／可隨時隨地聽見世界各地創作的聲音」等，並結合Pine II & Gilmore（1998）提出的體驗框架理論紮根與驗證，整合建構出「類創作音樂APP」的體驗設計框架。本研究最後由問卷分析得知以下發現：（一）透過相關性分析得知原始魅力構面中的「創作方式」與「創作自由度之可創作性」、「互動與回饋之可玩性」與「音樂設計之音樂性」、「使用目的之實用性」與「社交性」呈現高度顯著相關，分析其使用經驗脈絡以提出相關設計建議；（二）從深度訪談觀察得知不同音樂經驗程度者其使用者經驗和需求略有差異，但從問卷分析驗證後未呈現顯著差異，有待日後擴大受測樣本數，且均量之各組不同音樂經驗程度者之樣本數，以作進一步驗證和分析探討。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) As the information era comes, the automatic and digital economic development of industries has developed. However, under the impact of digitalization and internet popularization, the industrial value of the music industry is decreasing. Facing the rapid evolution of digital technologies, the music industry has to reconsider how to comply with such a trend. The application of technology to expand the added value of digital music has become the major subject of musicians at present.The world has entered into the era of the experience economy in the 21st century. The public consumption pattern has transformed from rational consumption to perceptual consumption. For the requirements of product consumption, the basic requirements at a functional use level have transformed to the desire for emotional satisfaction at a psychological level. The purpose of this research was to discuss how to design charming music experiences through technology. A music creation assistant smartphone app was taken as an example to apply creativity to the added value content of digital music so as to create the value of interactive music products. The research results could be used by R&D and design personnel for relevant products and by developers of digital content in relevant industries as a reference for the future development and improvement of relevant productsThe expert interview research method was mainly applied in this study. Combined with the charm engineering EGM assessment structured approach, in-depth observations of users’ interactive experiences and the 5W2H analysis method were conducted to analyze users’ experience and requirements, extract charm factors, and establish a structural map of the charm assessment. The structural map of the charm assessment was regarded as the basis of the questionnaire design to conduct a questionnaire for people with high involvement, so as to verify the qualitative analysis result. The structure of eight charm factors (upper: abstract assessment feeling; middle: original assessment reason; lower: specific assessment matters) was as follows: “sense of being friendly and amiable (sense of security)/usability of UI design/the UI should be instinct, simple, and easy to operate”; “sense of fun/playability of interaction and feedback/it should require a little skill but be not too difficult”; “sense of pleasure in listening/musicality of music design/different people’s favorite music type”; “stylization/sense of wholeness/design aesthetics/good texture of interface, delicate pattern design”; “easy control/creativity of degree of creation freedom/diversified materials for creation, the more the better”; “operational smoothness (friendly)/way of creation/clear and simple creation rules; easy to get started but not monotonous”; “sense of pleasure (interest)/practicability of use purpose/relaxation and recreation (kill time, cultivate mind and body, play as a musical instrument, be able to play the songs of favorite singers, enjoy the pleasure of creation, role play, etc.)”; and “sense of fun/sociability/be able to hear the sounds of creation from all over the world at any time”. Combined with the experience frame theory proposed by Pine II & Gilmore (1999), this study integrated and constructed the experience design frame of music creation assistant apps.The questionnaire analysis made a number of findings. First, it was learned from the correlation analysis that, in the aspect of the original charm factors, there were significant correlations between “way of creation” and “creativity within the creation freedom”, “playability of interaction and feedback” and “musicality of music design”, and “practicability of use purpose” and “sociability”. The use experience context was analyzed to propose relevant design suggestions for these correlations. Second, it was known from the in-depth interviews and observations that the user experience and requirements of people with different degrees of music experience varied slightly, but no significant difference was verified by the questionnaire analysis. The sample size of the participants and amount people with different degrees of music experience in every group should be expanded in the future for further verification and analysis. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………11.1研究背景…………………………………………………………11.2研究動機…………………………………………………………31.3研究問題…………………………………………………………71.4研究目的…………………………………………………………71.5研究範圍…………………………………………………………7第二章 文獻探討 …………………………………………………82.1互動設計…………………………………………………………82.2體驗………………………………………………………………152.3 小結………………………………………………………………….20第三章 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………223.1 研究方法…………………………………………………………223.2 研究架構…………………………………………………………243.3 研究步驟說明……………………………………………………253.4 研究樣本篩選與施測……………………………………………273.5 EGM深度訪談……………………………………………………353.6 問卷調查………………………………………………………… 71第四章：分析與討論 …………………………………………………1084.1魅力因子綜合分析………………………………………………1084.2體驗構面分類與歸納……………………………………………1114.3使用者經驗分析與需求…………………………………………1134.4 使用者經驗分析小結……………………………………………1304.5 魅力因子相關性分析……………………………………………132 第五章：結論與建議…………………………………………………1525.1研究限制…………………………………………………………1535.2 類創作音樂APP之魅力因子與體驗評價結論………………………1545.3 不同音樂經驗程度使用者之體驗評價差異結論….…..………..1615.4使用者經驗分析與需求推探結論………………………………1645.5建議………………………………………………………………1715.6後續研究建議……………………………………………………172參考文獻 …………………………………………………………… 174中文文獻……………………………………………………………..174英文文獻……………………………………………………………..177附錄一：調查問卷………………………………………………………………… 180附錄二：EGM訪談紀錄………………………………………………………..189附錄三：類創作音樂APP評價構造訪談提及次數與問卷調查數值對照總表..199 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4166154 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098462005 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位音樂 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位內容 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 魅力因子 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用者經驗 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 體驗設計 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 體驗評價 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Digital music en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Digital content en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Charm factors en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) User experience en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Experience design en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Experience assessmen en_US dc.title (題名) 類創作音樂APP之使用者經驗分析與體驗評價 ─以智慧型手機為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Experience Analysis and Experience Assessment of Users of Music Creation Assistant Apps—Taking Smartphones as an Example en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻王鴻祥、翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑譯（2005）。Donald A. Norman著。情感設計 EmotionalDesign。台北市：田園城市出版社。王育英、梁曉鶯譯（2000）。Schmitt, B.H.著。體驗行銷 Experiential Marketing. How toGet Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, Relate to Your Company and Brands。台北市：經典傳訊文化。台灣環球唱片公司（2009）。Asahuang錄攝。2009潘瑋柏未來世界演唱會-立體浮空投影。取自：http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOo1byrQgVg。台灣唱片出版事業基金會IFPI Taiwan（2012）。台灣唱片業發展現況。台北市。取自：http://www.ifpi.org.tw/。林千惠（2009）。出國旅遊之體驗價值研究。臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所，碩士論文。林欣怡（2008）。情緒層次設計因素與手機使用者經驗：本能層次、行為層次以及反思層次。交通大學傳播研究所。碩士論文。吳尚翰（2007）。以體驗觀點探討消費者與數位音樂產品之互動以ipod為例。雲林科技大學工業設計系，碩士論文。威治、朱詩迪、李立心譯（2017）。Derek Thompson著。引爆瘋潮：徹底掌握流行擴散與大眾心理的操作策略 Hit Makers: The Science of Popularity in an Age of Distraction。台北市：商周出版。風潮音樂（2010）。風潮音樂最新喜訊！蕭青陽設計《故事島Story Island》入圍葛萊美！。風潮秘密基地。取自：http://blog.xuite.net/wm_dsc/music/40533268。風潮音樂（2011）。歌開始的地方─泰武國小古謠傳唱。取自：http://youtu.be/LNkjQtp_hx8。洪沛然譯（2010）。Suzanne Ginsburg著。iPhone User Experience簡單法則：好感度的iPhone使用者體驗 Designing the iPhone User Experience: A User-Centered Approach to Sketching and Prototyping iPhone Apps。台北市：碁峰資訊股份有限公司。范振光（2010）。想聽音樂？走，到雲端去‧台北市：聯合晚報。馬敏元（2010）。淺談日本新產品開發之感「心」技術。工業材料雜誌，第280期，160-172。莊明振（2005）。產品設計要素對使用者情緒激發與偏好影響之模糊推論模式(I) 。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。夏業良、魯煒譯（2003）。B. Joseph Pine II．James H. Gilmore 著。體驗經濟時代 The Experience Economy。台北市：經濟新潮社。徐嘉良（2006）。使用者經驗應用於概念發想之研究，交通大學應用藝術研究所，碩士論文。陳品先（2012）。Google Chrome打造個人化互動性MV 展示HTML 5技術極限。台北市：數位時代。取自bnext.com.tw/article/15938/BN-ARTICLE-15938陳建雄譯（2009）。Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H.著。互動設計：跨越人─電腦互動 Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction。台北市：全華圖書股份有限公司。陳俊智、徐德芬（2010）。使用網路遊戲之體驗評價與偏好─以開心農場為例，台灣感性學會研討會，研討會論文。陳簾伃（2004）。體驗品質對情緒、價值、體驗滿意度、承諾及行為意圖影響之研究─以台灣現代戲劇演出為例，天主教輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。張良知（2010）。智慧型手機夯 價格將走親民風。台北市：中央社。張美惠譯（1999）。Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian著。資訊經營法則 Information Rules:A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy。台北市：時報出版。葛婷婷（2011）。賺錢？先分析使用者經驗‧創新發現誌。第34期，98。葉謹睿著（2010）。互動設計概論：後數位時代網站、介面、產品設計的原則。藝術家出版社。黃琡雅（2009）。台灣鐵道地方支線產業體驗模式之研究。東華大學科技藝術研究所，碩士論文。黃映瑀（2005）。體驗行銷、體驗價值、顧客滿意、品牌行向與行為意象關係之研究。大葉大學事業經營研究所，碩士論文。黃盈裕（2001）。顧客價值的方法目標鏈結模式之研究─以童裝之消費經驗為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所，博士論文。博報堂總和研究所（2006）。五感的時代 視、聽、嗅、味、觸覺的消費社會學（鍾霓譯)。台北市：中衛發展中心。趙三賢譯（2003）。William L. Benzon著。腦內交響曲─從認知科學與文化探討音樂的創造與聆賞 Beethoven`s Anvil: Music In Mind And Culture。台北市：商周出版社。楊宜桂、梁朝雲（2007）。台灣非流行音樂產業行銷管理之創新策略。廣告學研究，28，1－28。詹宏志（2003）。當體驗經濟來臨時。台北市：數位時代雙週刊，62期。鄧麗萍（2010）。簡單生活節 創造城市美學。台北市：財訊。鄭淑瑛、許正旺（2010）。初探百貨公司建築外觀之造形魅力因子。設計與文化學術研討會。劉家成、鄧怡莘（2004）。擷取使用者經驗之方法初探。2004國際設計論壇暨第九屆中華民國設計學會設計學術研討會。台南市：成功大學。劉蓮華譯（1988）。Buck, Percy C.著。音樂家心理學 Psychology for Musicians。台北市：五洲出版。賴逸婷（2007）。網站體驗品質評估之研究。雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系研究所，碩士論文。數位時代（2010）。APP狂潮。台北市：數位時代雙週刊，189期。羅耀宗、黃貝玲、蔡宏明譯（2009）。Don Tapscott著。N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界Grown Up Digital：How the Net Generation is Changing Your World。台北市：美商麥格羅。希爾出版。羅耀宗、蔡慧菁譯（2009）。Chris Anderson著（2009）。免費！揭開零定價的獲利秘密 Free—The Future of a Radical Price。台北市：天下文化出版社。 英文文獻Batra, R. and Ahtola O. T. (1990). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources ofConsumer Attitude. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.Buck Percy C. (1944). Psychology for Musicians. Oxford University Press.B. Joseph Pine II and James H. Gilmore (1998). Welcome to the Experience Economy.Harvard business review, Reprint 98407.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Csikszentmihalyi, M. and LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 815-822.Davies, R. (1989). The Lyre of Orphenus. Penguin Book, New York.Derek Thompson(2017). Hit Makers: The Science of Popularity in a Age of Distraction.Penguin Press.Hirschman E. C. & Holbrook M. B., (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts,Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(Summer), 92-101.Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The Natural of Customer Value: An Axiology of Services in theConsumption Experience. Service Quality: New Directions in theory and Practice, R. T. Rust and R. L. Olover(Eds.), CA: Sage Publications, 21-71.Holbrook. M. B. (1996). Special Session Summary Customer Value C a Framework ForAnalysis and Research. in NA - Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 138-142.Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research.Routledge, New York.Holbrook. M. B. (2000). The millennial consumer in the tests of our times: Experience andentertainment. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(2), 178-192.IFPI(2012), IFPI Digital Music Report 2012, http://www.ifpi.org/ .Jacob Gube(2010), What Is User Experience Design? Overview, Tools And Resources:http://uxdesign.smashingmagazine.com/2010/10/05/what-is-user-experience-design-overview-tools-and-resources/ .Janus Friis(2010). Skype and Kazaa founders launch new music service:https://www.techradar.com/in/news/internet/skype-and-kazaa-founders-launch-new-music-service-693873 .Maslow A. H. (1943). Maslow`s hierarchy of needs. A Theory of Human Motivation.Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.Mano, Haim, and Oliver, Richard L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure ofthe consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, Gainesville, 20(3),451-466.Mathwicka C., Malhotrab N. & Rigdonc E. (2011). Experiential value: conceptualization,measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39–56.Norman, D. (1999). The invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution. MIT Press.Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.Basic Books.Norris, R. T. (1941). The theory of consumer`s demand. New Haven, CT: YaleUniversityPress.Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H. (2002), Interaction Design: Beyond Human-ComputerInteraction, Wiley.Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel,Think, Act, and Relate to Your Company and Brands. The Free Press, New York.Swan, John E. and Combs, Linda J. (1976). Product Performance and ConsumerSatisfaction: A New Concept. Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 40(2), 25-33.Sheth, J. N., B. I. Newman, and Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theoryof consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.Strahilevitz, M. & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: HowWell They Work May Depens on What You Are Trying to Sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(Mar), 434-446.Suzanne Ginsburg(2010). Designing the iPhone User Experience: A User-CenteredApproach to Sketching and Prototyping iPhone Apps. Addison-Wesley Professional.Vyas, D. (2005). Aspect based model of user experience. Paper presented at the AestheticExperience workshop of HCI 2005, Edinburgh, UK. Retrieved May 26, 2007, from http://www.idc.ul.ie/aesthetics/WSpapers/Vyas2005.pdf .William Benzon(2002). Beethoven`s Anvil: Music In Mind And Culture. Basic Books. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201901266 en_US
