學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Antipartyism and Public Opinion toward Presidential Unilateral Actions: The Case of Taiwan in 2017
作者 蔡宗漢
Tsai, Tsung-han*
Yu, Ching-hsin
貢獻者 政治系
日期 2019-07
上傳時間 24-Dec-2019 10:24:17 (UTC+8)
摘要 In this article, we examine how antipartyism influences the public’s preferences for the tools of presidential power by focusing on the case of Taiwan, which is a president-parliamentary system. We distinguish two types of antipartyism: general antipartyism and reactive antipartyism. The former refers to the general perception of political parties, whereas the latter involves the functions of parties in modern democracy. According to the analysis results, we find that general antipartyism is positively associated with support for the president’s power to unilaterally appoint judges. In contrast, reactive antipartyism leads to less support for executive privilege, unilateral judicial appointments, and the authority to direct agency implementation of policies passed by the legislature.
關聯 International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz033
dc.contributor 政治系
dc.creator (作者) 蔡宗漢
dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Tsung-han*
dc.creator (作者) Yu, Ching-hsin
dc.date (日期) 2019-07
dc.date.accessioned 24-Dec-2019 10:24:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 24-Dec-2019 10:24:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 24-Dec-2019 10:24:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127981-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In this article, we examine how antipartyism influences the public’s preferences for the tools of presidential power by focusing on the case of Taiwan, which is a president-parliamentary system. We distinguish two types of antipartyism: general antipartyism and reactive antipartyism. The former refers to the general perception of political parties, whereas the latter involves the functions of parties in modern democracy. According to the analysis results, we find that general antipartyism is positively associated with support for the president’s power to unilaterally appoint judges. In contrast, reactive antipartyism leads to less support for executive privilege, unilateral judicial appointments, and the authority to direct agency implementation of policies passed by the legislature.
dc.format.extent 183457 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
dc.title (題名) Antipartyism and Public Opinion toward Presidential Unilateral Actions: The Case of Taiwan in 2017
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1093/ijpor/edz033
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz033