Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 以功能性磁振造影探討算術應用題解題之大腦機制
An fMRI investigation of brain mechanisms underlying arithmetic word problem solving作者 伍贊達
Ng, Chan-Tat貢獻者 張葶葶
Chang, Ting-Ting
伍贊達
Ng, Chan-Tat關鍵詞 應用題
功能性磁振造影
數學認知
閱讀理解
數學學習
認知控制
額頂網絡
一致效應
Word problems
fMRI
Mathematical cognition
Text comprehension
Mathematical learning
Cognitive control
Fronto-parietal network
Consistency effect日期 2020 上傳時間 2-Mar-2020 11:13:58 (UTC+8) 摘要 The practice of arithmetic word problems serves to generalize mathematical concepts into real-world settings, but the word problem performances of both children and adults are far from satisfactory. Despite the extensive research on behavioral and cognitive components of arithmetic word problem solving, the underlying neural mechanisms are poorly understood. This current thesis aims to tackle the issue by investigating brain responses towards word problem solving using fMRI. In Study 1, we compared arithmetic word problems and nonarithmetic narrative problems with no numerical manipulation so that we should be allowed to study the specific role of numerical processing embedded within a narrative structure. Results showed that the processing of word problems should be distinct from text comprehension, as the former involved more in the frontal-insular-parietal areas whereas the latter was more strongly engaged in the canonical language system. In Study 2, to investigate how linguistic factors modulate numerical processing during word problem solving, we examined solutions of compare word problems, and each problem includes a relational term comparing the values of two parameters (e.g. dumpling costs 2 dollars more than wonton). Results revealed a consistency by operation interaction in the fronto-insular-parietal network. Specifically, mathematical models requiring subtraction engaged stronger activations than addition during consistent problem solving (in which the relational term was consistent with the required arithmetic operation, e.g., “more than” - addition), whereas the neural activation pattern of the operation effect for inconsistent problems was opposite to that for consistent problems. These findings further indicated that relations between the linguistic and numerical factors were interactive in word problems. In Study 3, we conducted the experiment of Study 2 on children from Grade 3 to Grade 6 to investigate developmental changes in word problem solving. Results suggested greater involvement of the network of inhibitory control in children for inconsistent than consistent problems. Furthermore, the interaction between consistency and operation was observed only in adults but not children, emphasizing that the interaction observed between linguistic and numerical factors could be a learned effect. To sum up, the current thesis examines the underlying brain mechanisms of word problem solving. We demonstrate that word problem solving is more dependent on the cognitive control system than semantic processing, probably due to the need for deriving mathematical problem models from the text. Also, we stress the important roles of interactive effects between different factors in word problems rather than separate components alone, as numerical processing is possibly altered by the problem description. More importantly, we have demonstrated age-group differences in these effects, revealing critical developmental changes in word problem solving. By uncovering brain mechanisms of this school curriculum practice, we potentially provide foundations for deficit remediation and pedagogical improvement. 參考文獻 Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Plummer, J. (1997). Final Report of Language Background as a Variable in NAEP Mathematics Performance. Retrieved from https://cresst.org/wp-content/uploads/TECH429.pdfAcademia Sinica. (2010). Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. Retrieved from http://asbc.iis.sinica.edu.tw/Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: evidence for a major subdivision within the brain`s semantic networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1740), 20160515. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0515Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2019). A distinct cortical network for mathematical knowledge in the human brain. Neuroimage, 189, 19-31. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.001Ansari, D., Dhital, B., & Siong, S. C. (2006). Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes. Brain Research, 1067(1), 181-188. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.083Arsalidou, M., Pawliw-Levac, M., Sadeghi, M., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2018). Brain areas associated with numbers and calculations in children: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 239-250. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.002Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach. Developmental Review, 2(3), 213-236. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(82)90012-0Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3-34.Austin, J. D., & Lee, M. A. B. (1982). Readability and mathematics text item difficulty. School Science and Mathematics, 82, 284-290.Barbey, A. K., Koenigs, M., & Grafman, J. (2013). Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex, 49(5), 1195-1205. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022Barrouillet, P., Mignon, M., & Thevenot, C. (2008). Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(4), 233-251. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.001Barrouillet, P., & Thevenot, C. (2013). On the problem-size effect in small additions: Can we really discard any counting-based account? Cognition, 128(1), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.018Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding Apples and Oranges: Alignment of Semantic and Formal Knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 99-134. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0675Bernardo, A. B. I. (1999). Overcoming Obstacles to Understanding and Solving Word Problems in Mathematics. Educational Psychology, 19(2), 149-163. doi:10.1080/0144341990190203Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767-2796. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055Björn, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2016). Primary school text comprehension predicts mathematical word problem-solving skills in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 362-377. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.992392Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word Problem Solving in Contemporary Math Education: A Plea for Reading Comprehension Skills Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(191). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 277-290. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004Cai, W., Chen, T., Ryali, S., Kochalka, J., Li, C. S., & Menon, V. (2016). Causal Interactions Within a Frontal-Cingulate-Parietal Network During Cognitive Control: Convergent Evidence from a Multisite-Multitask Investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2140-2153. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv046Campbell, J. I. D. (2008). Subtraction by addition. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1094-1102. doi:10.3758/mc.36.6.1094Campbell, J. I. D., & Timm, J. C. (2000). Adults’ strategy choices for simple addition: Effects of retrieval interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 692-699. doi:10.3758/BF03213008Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e125. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040125Carpentier, A., Pugh, K. R., Westerveld, M., Studholme, C., Skrinjar, O., Thompson, J. L., . . . Constable, R. T. (2001). Functional MRI of Language Processing: Dependence on Input Modality and Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 42(10), 1241-1254. doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.35500.xCaspers, S., Geyer, S., Schleicher, A., Mohlberg, H., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2006). The human inferior parietal cortex: cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. Neuroimage, 33(2), 430-448. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.054Chai, W. J., Abd Hamid, A. I., & Abdullah, J. M. (2018). Working Memory From the Psychological and Neurosciences Perspectives: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 401-401. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401Chang, T.-T., Lee, P.-H., & Metcalfe, A. W. S. (2018). Intrinsic insula network engagement underlying children`s reading and arithmetic skills. Neuroimage, 167, 162-177. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.027Chang, T.-T., Metcalfe, A. W. S., Padmanabhan, A., Chen, T., & Menon, V. (2016). Heterogeneous and nonlinear development of human posterior parietal cortex function. Neuroimage, 126, 184-195. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.053Chang, T.-T., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Metcalfe, A. W. S., Chen, T., & Menon, V. (2015). Development of common neural representations for distinct numerical problems. Neuropsychologia, 75, 481-495. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.005Choi, H. J., Zilles, K., Mohlberg, H., Schleicher, A., Fink, G. R., Armstrong, E., & Amunts, K. (2006). Cytoarchitectonic identification and probabilistic mapping of two distinct areas within the anterior ventral bank of the human intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 495(1), 53-69. doi:10.1002/cne.20849Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76(4), 387-404. doi:10.1037/h0027578Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29(3), 162-173.Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63-68. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001Cummins, D. D. (1991). Children`s Interpretations of Arithmetic Word Problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8(3), 261-289. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0803_2Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405-438. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348Daselaar, S. M., Prince, S. E., & Cabeza, R. (2004). When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory. Neuroimage, 23(3), 921-927. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.031Davis, N., Cannistraci, C. J., Rogers, B. P., Gatenby, J. C., Fuchs, L. S., Anderson, A. W., & Gore, J. C. (2009). The neural correlates of calculation ability in children: an fMRI study. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(9), 1187-1197. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.010De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1986). Eye-movement data as access to solution processes of elementary addition and subtraction problems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The Effect of Semantic Structure on First Graders` Strategies for Solving Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 363-381. doi:10.2307/749085De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Pauwels, A. (1990). Influence of the semantic structure of word problems on second graders` eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 359-365. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.359De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Coillie, V. (1988). Influence of number size, problem structure, and response mode on children`s solutions of multiplication word problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 197-216. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED295783.pdfDe Smedt, B., Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2011). Effects of problem size and arithmetic operation on brain activation during calculation in children with varying levels of arithmetical fluency. Neuroimage, 57, 771-781. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.037De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Stassens, N., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Frequency, efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in two learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 205-215. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.020Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1988). Novice rules for assessing importance in scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(3), 288-308. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90056-3Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1991). Equations in Scientific Proofs: Effects on Comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 661-682. doi:10.3102/00028312028003661Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487. doi:10.1080/02643290244000239Deschuyteneer, M., De Rammelaere, S., & Fias, W. (2005). The addition of two-digit numbers: Exploring carry versus no-carry problems. Psychology Science, 47(1), 74-83.DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353-386. doi:10.1080/09541440244000328Devlin, J. T., Matthews, P. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2003). Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 71-84. doi:10.1162/089892903321107837Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Uluğ, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5(4), F9-F16. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00235Edin, F., Klingberg, T., Johansson, P., McNab, F., Tegnér, J., & Compte, A. (2009). Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6802-6807. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901894106Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage, 25(4), 1325-1335. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034Emerson, R. W., & Cantlon, J. F. (2012). Early math achievement and functional connectivity in the fronto-parietal network. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S139-S151. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.003Fayol, M., Abdi, H., & Gombert, J.-E. (1987). Arithmetic Problems Formulation and Working Memory Load. Cognition and Instruction, 4(3), 187-202. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0403_3Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Schumacher, R. F., Hamlett, C. L., . . . Vukovic, R. K. (2012). Contributions of domain-general cognitive resources and different forms of arithmetic development to pre-algebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1315-1326. doi:10.1037/a0027475Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Hamlett, C. L., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Is Word-Problem Solving a Form of Text Comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 204-223. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1005745Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Cirino, P. T., Schumacher, R. F., Marrin, S., Hamlett, C. L., . . . Changas, P. C. (2014). Does Calculation or Word-Problem Instruction Provide A Stronger Route to Pre-Algebraic Knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 990-1006. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541565Fung, W., & Swanson, H. L. (2017). Working memory components that predict word problem solving: Is it merely a function of reading, calculation, and fluid intelligence? Memory & Cognition, 45(5), 804-823. doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0697-0García, A. I., Jiménez, J. E., & Hess, S. (2006). Solving Arithmetic Word Problems: An Analysis of Classification as a Function of Difficulty in Children With and Without Arithmetic LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 270-281. doi:10.1177/00222194060390030601Gilmore, C., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., & Cragg, L. (2015). The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. ZDM, 47(5), 771-782. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0659-yGoodrich, J. M., & Namkung, J. M. (2019). Correlates of reading comprehension and word-problem solving skills of Spanish-speaking dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 48, 256-266. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.04.006Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2009). To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 604-608. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.013Griffis, J. C., Nenert, R., Allendorfer, J. B., Vannest, J., Holland, S., Dietz, A., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2017). The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 1636-1658. doi:10.1002/hbm.23476Haghverdi, M. (2012). Recognition of students` difficulties in solving mathematical word problems from the viewpoint of teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(3), 2923-2928.Haghverdi, M., Semnani, A. S., & Seifi, M. (2012). The relationship between different kinds of students` errors and the knowledge required to solve mathematics word problems. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 26, 649-666. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-636X2012000200012&nrm=isoHegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students` eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 76-84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.76Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18-32. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18Hudson, T. (1983). Correspondences and Numerical Differences between Disjoint Sets. Child Development, 54(1), 84-90. doi:10.2307/1129864Huebner, M. G., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2018). Selection of procedures in mental subtraction: Use of eye movements as a window on arithmetic processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 171-182. doi:10.1037/cep0000127Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2008). Effects of problem size, operation, and working-memory span on simple-arithmetic strategies: differences between children and adults? Psychological Research, 72(3), 331-346. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0112-8Jahanshahi, M., Obeso, I., Rothwell, J. C., & Obeso, J. A. (2015). A fronto–striato–subthalamic–pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(12), 719-732. doi:10.1038/nrn4038Jerman, M. (1974). Problem length as a structural variable in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(1), 109-123. doi:10.1007/BF00684692Kaput, J. J. (1979). Mathematics andlearning: Roots of epistemological status. In J. Clement & J. Lochhead (Eds.), Cognitive Process Instruction (pp. 289-303). Philadephia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.Kawashima, R., Taira, M., Okita, K., Inoue, K., Tajima, N., Yoshida, H., . . . Fukuda, H. (2004). A functional MRI study of simple arithmetic–a comparison between children and adults. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(3), 227-233. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14741309Kelly, A. M. C., Uddin, L. Q., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2008). Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. Neuroimage, 39(1), 527-537. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.008Kim, C., Kroger, J. K., Calhoun, V. D., & Clark, V. P. (2015). The role of the frontopolar cortex in manipulation of integrated information in working memory. Neuroscience Letters, 595, 25-29. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.044Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2014). Error Analysis of Mathematical Word Problem Solving Across Students with and without Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 66-74. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12029Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109-129. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.109Ko, C.-H., Yen, J.-Y., Yen, C.-F., Chen, C.-S., Lin, W.-C., Wang, P.-W., & Liu, G.-C. (2013). Brain activation deficit in increased-load working memory tasks among adults with ADHD using fMRI. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 263(7), 561-573. doi:10.1007/s00406-013-0407-2Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129-164. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1Lean, G. A., Clements, M. A., & Del Campo, G. (1990). Linguistic and pedagogical factors affecting children`s understanding of arithmetic word problems: A comparative study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(2), 165-191. doi:10.1007/BF00304900Lee, K., Lim, Z. Y., Yeong, S. H., Ng, S. F., Venkatraman, V., & Chee, M. W. (2007). Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: neuroanatomical correlates. Brain Research, 1155, 163-171. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.040LeFevre, J.-A., & Morris, J. (1999). More on the relation between division and multiplication in simple arithmetic: Evidence for mediation of division solutions via multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 803-812. doi:10.3758/BF03198533LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 216-230. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.216Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2011). Age-related changes in children`s executive functions and strategy selection: A study in computational estimation. Cognitive Development, 26(3), 282-294. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.01.002Lepik, M. (1990). Algebraic word problems: Role of linguistic and structural variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 83-90. doi:10.1007/BF00311017Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students` miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 363-371. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.363Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701-708. doi:10.1037/a0032625Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333-368.Mastrothanasis, K., Geladari, A., Zervoudakis, K., & Strakalis, P. (2018). Primary school pupils` strategies for mental addition and subtraction computations. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(8), 43-56. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/August-2018/04.pdfMayer, R. E. (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives (pp. 123-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Menon, V. (2014). Arithmetic in the child and adult brain. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mathematical Cognition: Oxford University Press.Menon, V. (2016). Memory and cognitive control circuits in mathematical cognition and learning. In M. Cappelletti & W. Fias (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 227, pp. 159-186): Elsevier.Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5-6), 655-667. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0Metcalfe, A. W. S., Ashkenazi, S., Rosenberg-Lee, M., & Menon, V. (2013). Fractionating the neural correlates of individual working memory components underlying arithmetic problem solving skills in children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 162-175. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.10.001Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167-202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167Mock, J., Huber, S., Bloechle, J., Dietrich, J. F., Bahnmueller, J., Rennig, J., . . . Moeller, K. (2018). Magnitude processing of symbolic and non-symbolic proportions: an fMRI study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 14(1), 9. doi:10.1186/s12993-018-0141-zMädamürk, K., Kikas, E., & Palu, A. (2018). Calculation and word problem-solving skill profiles: relationship to previous skills and interest. Educational Psychology, 38(10), 1239-1254. doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1495830Molko, N., Cachia, A., Rivière, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bihan, D., . . . Dehaene, S. (2003). Functional and Structural Alterations of the Intraparietal Sulcus in a Developmental Dyscalculia of Genetic Origin. Neuron, 40(4), 847-858. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00670-6Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2012). Thought beyond language: neural dissociation of algebra and natural language. Psychological Science, 23(8), 914-922. doi:10.1177/0956797612437427Muth, K. D. (1992). Extraneous information and extra steps in arithmetic word problems. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(3), 278-285. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(92)90066-8National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Nesher, P. (1976). Three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(4), 369-388. doi:10.1007/BF00452220Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 41-51. doi:10.1007/bf00590023Newman, S. D., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., Roth, J., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca’s area. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(2), 297-307. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00285-9Newman, S. D., Pruce, B., Rusia, A., & Burns Jr., T. (2010). The effect of strategy on problem solving: an fMRI study. The Journal of Problem Solving, 3(1). doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1076Newman, S. D., Willoughby, G., & Pruce, B. (2011). The effect of problem structure on problem-solving: an fMRI study of word versus number problems. Brain Research, 1410, 77-88. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.053Ni, W., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Shaywitz, S. E., . . . Shankweiler, D. (2000). An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 120-133. doi:10.1162/08989290051137648Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185-208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., & Willoughby, G. (2015). Multi-digit number processing: overview, conceptual clarifications, and language influences. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Revised ed. Vol. I): OECD.Orrantia, J., & Múñez, D. (2013). Arithmetic word problem solving: evidence for a magnitude-based mental representation. Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 98-108. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0241-1Orrantia, J., Rodríguez, L., & Vicente, S. (2010). Automatic activation of addition facts in arithmetic word problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 310-319. doi:10.1080/17470210902903020Ostad, S. A. (1998). Developmental Differences in Solving Simple Arithmetic Word Problems and Simple Number-fact Problems: A Comparison of Mathematically Normal and Mathematically Disabled Children. Mathematical Cognition, 4(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/135467998387389Pape, S. J. (2003). Compare word problems: Consistency hypothesis revisited. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 396-421. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00046-2Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-Term Memory, Working Memory, and Inhibitory Control in Children with Difficulties in Arithmetic Problem Solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(1), 44-57. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2626Peters, G., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Children`s use of addition to solve two-digit subtraction problems. British Journal of Psychology, 104(4), 495-511. doi:10.1111/bjop.12003Peters, L., & De Smedt, B. (2018). Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 265-279. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.05.002Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547-555. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Riviere, D., & LeBihan, D. (2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1013-1026. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0913Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2014). Does Early Algebraic Reasoning Differ as a Function of Students` Difficulty with Calculations versus Word Problems? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(3), 106-116. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12037Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., & Changas, P. C. (2015). Effects of a Multitier Support System on Calculation, Word Problem, and Prealgebraic Performance Among At-Risk Learners. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 443-470. doi:10.1177/0014402914563702Prabhakaran, V., Rypma, B., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Neural substrates of mathematical reasoning: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neocortical activation during performance of the necessary arithmetic operations test. Neuropsychology, 15(1), 115-127. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11216882Raduan, I. H. (2010). Error analysis and the corresponding cognitive activities committed by year five primary students in solving mathematical word problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3836-3838. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.600Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 110-122. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49-101. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0501_2Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children`s problem solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The Development of Mathematical Thinking (pp. 153-196). New York: Academic Press.Rosenberg-Lee, M., Chang, T. T., Young, C. B., Wu, S., & Menon, V. (2011). Functional dissociations between four basic arithmetic operations in the human posterior parietal cortex: A cytoarchitectonic mapping study. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2592-2608. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.035Scheperjans, F., Eickhoff, S. B., Homke, L., Mohlberg, H., Hermann, K., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2008). Probabilistic maps, morphometry, and variability of cytoarchitectonic areas in the human superior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 2141-2157. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm241Schumacher, R. F., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Does understanding relational terminology mediate effects of intervention on compare word problems? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 607-628. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.001Searle, B. W., Lorton, P., & Suppes, P. (1974). Structural variables affecting CAI performance on arithmetic word problems of disadvantaged and deaf students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(1), 371-384. doi:10.1007/BF00684708Shaftel, J., Belton-Kocher, E., Glasnapp, D., & Poggio, J. (2006). The Impact of Language Characteristics in Mathematics Test Items on the Performance of English Language Learners and Students With Disabilities. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 105-126. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1102_2Shenhav, A., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2016). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 1286. doi:10.1038/nn.4384Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P.-F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: A brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. Brain, 123(11), 2240-2255. doi:10.1093/brain/123.11.2240Supekar, K., & Menon, V. (2012). Developmental maturation of dynamic causal control signals in higher-order cognition: a neurocognitive network model. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(2), e1002374. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002374Swanson, H. L., Cooney, J. B., & Brock, S. (1993). The Influence of Working Memory and Classification Ability on Children′s Word Problem Solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55(3), 374-395. doi:10.1006/jecp.1993.1021Swanson, H. L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2008). Growth in working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 343-379. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.343Thevenot, C., Devidal, M., Barrouillet, P., & Fayol, M. (2007). Why does placing the question before an arithmetic word problem improve performance? A situation model account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 43-56. doi:10.1080/17470210600587927Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The strategic use of alternative representations in arithmetic word problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(7), 1311-1323. doi:10.1080/02724980443000593Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Acquisition and Use of Shortcut Strategies by Traditionally Schooled Children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(1), 1-17. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40284582Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K. S., Ryali, S., & Menon, V. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(50), 18578-18589. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011Van Beek, L., Ghesquièr, P., De Smedt, B., & Lagae, L. (2014). The arithmetic problem size effect in children: an event-related potential study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(756). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00756Vandierendonck, A. (2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 653-673. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0721-5Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer`s consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 85-94. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.85Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Influence of situational and conceptual rewording on word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 829-848. doi:10.1348/000709907x178200Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409-426. doi:10.1080/01443410701708228Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Cognitive and Linguistic Predictors of Mathematical Word Problems With and Without Irrelevant Information. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 79-87. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.015Weiss, Y., Cweigenberg, H. G., & Booth, J. R. (2018). Neural specialization of phonological and semantic processing in young children. Human Brain Mapping, 39(11), 4334-4348. doi:10.1002/hbm.24274Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 971-978. doi:10.1038/nn1727Wilcox, S., & Palermo, D. (1997). In, on under; more, less; some artifactrs revealed. Paper presented at the Eastern Psychologyical Association meetings, Boston.Woltz, D. J., & Was, C. A. (2006). Availability of related long-term memory during and after attention focus in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 34(3), 668-684. doi:10.3758/bf03193587Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8(8), 665-670. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635Yearp, B. H., & Kaur, B. (2001). Semantic characteristics that make arithmetic word problems difficult. Paper presented at the Numeracy and Beyond: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated, Australia.Zamarian, L., Ischebeck, A., & Delazer, M. (2009). Neuroscience of learning arithmetic—Evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(6), 909-925. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.005Zarnhofer, S., Braunstein, V., Ebner, F., Koschutnig, K., Neuper, C., Ninaus, M., . . . Ischebeck, A. (2013). Individual differences in solving arithmetic word problems. Behavioral and Brain Function, 9(1), 28. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-9-28Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In Handbook of Mathematical Cognition. (pp. 331-345). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.Zhang, S., & Li, C.-s. R. (2012). Functional networks for cognitive control in a stop signal task: Independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 33(1), 89-104. doi:10.1002/hbm.21197Zhou, X., Li, M., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Cui, J., Liu, J., & Chen, C. (2018). The semantic system is involved in mathematical problem solving. Neuroimage, 166, 360-370. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.017 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學系
106752027資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106752027 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 張葶葶 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chang, Ting-Ting en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 伍贊達 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Ng, Chan-Tat en_US dc.creator (作者) 伍贊達 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Ng, Chan-Tat en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Mar-2020 11:13:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Mar-2020 11:13:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Mar-2020 11:13:58 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106752027 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128862 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 心理學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106752027 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The practice of arithmetic word problems serves to generalize mathematical concepts into real-world settings, but the word problem performances of both children and adults are far from satisfactory. Despite the extensive research on behavioral and cognitive components of arithmetic word problem solving, the underlying neural mechanisms are poorly understood. This current thesis aims to tackle the issue by investigating brain responses towards word problem solving using fMRI. In Study 1, we compared arithmetic word problems and nonarithmetic narrative problems with no numerical manipulation so that we should be allowed to study the specific role of numerical processing embedded within a narrative structure. Results showed that the processing of word problems should be distinct from text comprehension, as the former involved more in the frontal-insular-parietal areas whereas the latter was more strongly engaged in the canonical language system. In Study 2, to investigate how linguistic factors modulate numerical processing during word problem solving, we examined solutions of compare word problems, and each problem includes a relational term comparing the values of two parameters (e.g. dumpling costs 2 dollars more than wonton). Results revealed a consistency by operation interaction in the fronto-insular-parietal network. Specifically, mathematical models requiring subtraction engaged stronger activations than addition during consistent problem solving (in which the relational term was consistent with the required arithmetic operation, e.g., “more than” - addition), whereas the neural activation pattern of the operation effect for inconsistent problems was opposite to that for consistent problems. These findings further indicated that relations between the linguistic and numerical factors were interactive in word problems. In Study 3, we conducted the experiment of Study 2 on children from Grade 3 to Grade 6 to investigate developmental changes in word problem solving. Results suggested greater involvement of the network of inhibitory control in children for inconsistent than consistent problems. Furthermore, the interaction between consistency and operation was observed only in adults but not children, emphasizing that the interaction observed between linguistic and numerical factors could be a learned effect. To sum up, the current thesis examines the underlying brain mechanisms of word problem solving. We demonstrate that word problem solving is more dependent on the cognitive control system than semantic processing, probably due to the need for deriving mathematical problem models from the text. Also, we stress the important roles of interactive effects between different factors in word problems rather than separate components alone, as numerical processing is possibly altered by the problem description. More importantly, we have demonstrated age-group differences in these effects, revealing critical developmental changes in word problem solving. By uncovering brain mechanisms of this school curriculum practice, we potentially provide foundations for deficit remediation and pedagogical improvement. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Abstract iContents iiiList of Tables vList of Figures viiChapter 1 Background and Introduction 11.1 Cognitive Components of Arithmetic Word Problems 41.1.1 Numerical factors 61.1.2 Linguistic factors 171.1.3 Domain-general cognitive factors 271.2 Neural Correlates of Arithmetic Word Problems 301.3 Overview of the Current Thesis 39Chapter 2 Brain Correlates of Arithmetic vs Nonarithmetic Word Problems 422.1 Rationale 422.2 Methods 432.2.1 Participants 432.2.2 Stimuli and task design 432.2.3 fMRI data acquisition 452.2.4 fMRI data preprocessing 462.2.5 fMRI analysis 472.3 Results 502.3.1 Behavioral performances 502.3.2 Greater frontal-parietal involvement in AWPs than in NWPs 522.3.3 Stronger perisylvian activations for NWPs over AWPs 542.3.4 Brain-behavior correlation during AWP solving 562.3.5 Strengthened frontal-parietal connectivity linked to AWP solving 582.4 Discussion 60Chapter 3 Neural Correlates of Adults’ Compare Word Problem Solving 663.1 Rationale 663.2 Methods 673.2.1 Participants 673.2.2 Stimuli and task design 673.2.3 fMRI data acquisition and preprocessing 693.2.4 fMRI analysis 703.3 Results 713.3.1 Behavioral results 713.3.2 Neuroimaging results 743.4 Discussion 82Chapter 4 Age-Related Differences in Neural Correlates of Word Problem Solving 884.1 Rationale 884.2 Children’s Word Problem Solving 894.2.1 Methods 894.2.2 Results 904.3 Age-Associated Effects on Word Problem Solving 994.3.1 Methods 994.3.2 Results 994.4 Discussion 108Chapter 5 Summary and Implication 117References 122Appendix A 148Appendix B 154 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4490714 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106752027 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 應用題 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 功能性磁振造影 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數學認知 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀理解 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數學學習 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 認知控制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 額頂網絡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 一致效應 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Word problems en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) fMRI en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mathematical cognition en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Text comprehension en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mathematical learning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cognitive control en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Fronto-parietal network en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Consistency effect en_US dc.title (題名) 以功能性磁振造影探討算術應用題解題之大腦機制 zh_TW dc.title (題名) An fMRI investigation of brain mechanisms underlying arithmetic word problem solving en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Plummer, J. (1997). Final Report of Language Background as a Variable in NAEP Mathematics Performance. Retrieved from https://cresst.org/wp-content/uploads/TECH429.pdfAcademia Sinica. (2010). Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. Retrieved from http://asbc.iis.sinica.edu.tw/Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: evidence for a major subdivision within the brain`s semantic networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1740), 20160515. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0515Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2019). A distinct cortical network for mathematical knowledge in the human brain. Neuroimage, 189, 19-31. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.001Ansari, D., Dhital, B., & Siong, S. C. (2006). Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes. Brain Research, 1067(1), 181-188. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.083Arsalidou, M., Pawliw-Levac, M., Sadeghi, M., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2018). Brain areas associated with numbers and calculations in children: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 239-250. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.002Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach. Developmental Review, 2(3), 213-236. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(82)90012-0Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3-34.Austin, J. D., & Lee, M. A. B. (1982). Readability and mathematics text item difficulty. School Science and Mathematics, 82, 284-290.Barbey, A. K., Koenigs, M., & Grafman, J. (2013). Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex, 49(5), 1195-1205. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022Barrouillet, P., Mignon, M., & Thevenot, C. (2008). Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(4), 233-251. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.001Barrouillet, P., & Thevenot, C. (2013). On the problem-size effect in small additions: Can we really discard any counting-based account? Cognition, 128(1), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.018Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding Apples and Oranges: Alignment of Semantic and Formal Knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 99-134. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0675Bernardo, A. B. I. (1999). Overcoming Obstacles to Understanding and Solving Word Problems in Mathematics. Educational Psychology, 19(2), 149-163. doi:10.1080/0144341990190203Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767-2796. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055Björn, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2016). Primary school text comprehension predicts mathematical word problem-solving skills in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 362-377. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.992392Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word Problem Solving in Contemporary Math Education: A Plea for Reading Comprehension Skills Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(191). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 277-290. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004Cai, W., Chen, T., Ryali, S., Kochalka, J., Li, C. S., & Menon, V. (2016). Causal Interactions Within a Frontal-Cingulate-Parietal Network During Cognitive Control: Convergent Evidence from a Multisite-Multitask Investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2140-2153. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv046Campbell, J. I. D. (2008). Subtraction by addition. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1094-1102. doi:10.3758/mc.36.6.1094Campbell, J. I. D., & Timm, J. C. (2000). Adults’ strategy choices for simple addition: Effects of retrieval interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 692-699. doi:10.3758/BF03213008Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e125. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040125Carpentier, A., Pugh, K. R., Westerveld, M., Studholme, C., Skrinjar, O., Thompson, J. L., . . . Constable, R. T. (2001). Functional MRI of Language Processing: Dependence on Input Modality and Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 42(10), 1241-1254. doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.35500.xCaspers, S., Geyer, S., Schleicher, A., Mohlberg, H., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2006). The human inferior parietal cortex: cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. Neuroimage, 33(2), 430-448. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.054Chai, W. J., Abd Hamid, A. I., & Abdullah, J. M. (2018). Working Memory From the Psychological and Neurosciences Perspectives: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 401-401. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401Chang, T.-T., Lee, P.-H., & Metcalfe, A. W. S. (2018). Intrinsic insula network engagement underlying children`s reading and arithmetic skills. Neuroimage, 167, 162-177. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.027Chang, T.-T., Metcalfe, A. W. S., Padmanabhan, A., Chen, T., & Menon, V. (2016). Heterogeneous and nonlinear development of human posterior parietal cortex function. Neuroimage, 126, 184-195. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.053Chang, T.-T., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Metcalfe, A. W. S., Chen, T., & Menon, V. (2015). Development of common neural representations for distinct numerical problems. Neuropsychologia, 75, 481-495. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.005Choi, H. J., Zilles, K., Mohlberg, H., Schleicher, A., Fink, G. R., Armstrong, E., & Amunts, K. (2006). Cytoarchitectonic identification and probabilistic mapping of two distinct areas within the anterior ventral bank of the human intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 495(1), 53-69. doi:10.1002/cne.20849Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76(4), 387-404. doi:10.1037/h0027578Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29(3), 162-173.Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63-68. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001Cummins, D. D. (1991). Children`s Interpretations of Arithmetic Word Problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8(3), 261-289. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0803_2Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405-438. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348Daselaar, S. M., Prince, S. E., & Cabeza, R. (2004). When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory. Neuroimage, 23(3), 921-927. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.031Davis, N., Cannistraci, C. J., Rogers, B. P., Gatenby, J. C., Fuchs, L. S., Anderson, A. W., & Gore, J. C. (2009). The neural correlates of calculation ability in children: an fMRI study. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(9), 1187-1197. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.010De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1986). Eye-movement data as access to solution processes of elementary addition and subtraction problems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The Effect of Semantic Structure on First Graders` Strategies for Solving Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 363-381. doi:10.2307/749085De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Pauwels, A. (1990). Influence of the semantic structure of word problems on second graders` eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 359-365. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.359De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Coillie, V. (1988). Influence of number size, problem structure, and response mode on children`s solutions of multiplication word problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 197-216. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED295783.pdfDe Smedt, B., Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2011). Effects of problem size and arithmetic operation on brain activation during calculation in children with varying levels of arithmetical fluency. Neuroimage, 57, 771-781. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.037De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Stassens, N., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Frequency, efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in two learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 205-215. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.020Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1988). Novice rules for assessing importance in scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(3), 288-308. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90056-3Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1991). Equations in Scientific Proofs: Effects on Comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 661-682. doi:10.3102/00028312028003661Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487. doi:10.1080/02643290244000239Deschuyteneer, M., De Rammelaere, S., & Fias, W. (2005). The addition of two-digit numbers: Exploring carry versus no-carry problems. Psychology Science, 47(1), 74-83.DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353-386. doi:10.1080/09541440244000328Devlin, J. T., Matthews, P. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2003). Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 71-84. doi:10.1162/089892903321107837Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Uluğ, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5(4), F9-F16. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00235Edin, F., Klingberg, T., Johansson, P., McNab, F., Tegnér, J., & Compte, A. (2009). Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6802-6807. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901894106Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage, 25(4), 1325-1335. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034Emerson, R. W., & Cantlon, J. F. (2012). Early math achievement and functional connectivity in the fronto-parietal network. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S139-S151. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.003Fayol, M., Abdi, H., & Gombert, J.-E. (1987). Arithmetic Problems Formulation and Working Memory Load. Cognition and Instruction, 4(3), 187-202. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0403_3Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Schumacher, R. F., Hamlett, C. L., . . . Vukovic, R. K. (2012). Contributions of domain-general cognitive resources and different forms of arithmetic development to pre-algebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1315-1326. doi:10.1037/a0027475Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Hamlett, C. L., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Is Word-Problem Solving a Form of Text Comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 204-223. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1005745Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Cirino, P. T., Schumacher, R. F., Marrin, S., Hamlett, C. L., . . . Changas, P. C. (2014). Does Calculation or Word-Problem Instruction Provide A Stronger Route to Pre-Algebraic Knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 990-1006. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541565Fung, W., & Swanson, H. L. (2017). Working memory components that predict word problem solving: Is it merely a function of reading, calculation, and fluid intelligence? Memory & Cognition, 45(5), 804-823. doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0697-0García, A. I., Jiménez, J. E., & Hess, S. (2006). Solving Arithmetic Word Problems: An Analysis of Classification as a Function of Difficulty in Children With and Without Arithmetic LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 270-281. doi:10.1177/00222194060390030601Gilmore, C., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., & Cragg, L. (2015). The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. ZDM, 47(5), 771-782. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0659-yGoodrich, J. M., & Namkung, J. M. (2019). Correlates of reading comprehension and word-problem solving skills of Spanish-speaking dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 48, 256-266. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.04.006Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2009). To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 604-608. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.013Griffis, J. C., Nenert, R., Allendorfer, J. B., Vannest, J., Holland, S., Dietz, A., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2017). The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 1636-1658. doi:10.1002/hbm.23476Haghverdi, M. (2012). Recognition of students` difficulties in solving mathematical word problems from the viewpoint of teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(3), 2923-2928.Haghverdi, M., Semnani, A. S., & Seifi, M. (2012). The relationship between different kinds of students` errors and the knowledge required to solve mathematics word problems. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 26, 649-666. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-636X2012000200012&nrm=isoHegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students` eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 76-84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.76Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18-32. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18Hudson, T. (1983). Correspondences and Numerical Differences between Disjoint Sets. Child Development, 54(1), 84-90. doi:10.2307/1129864Huebner, M. G., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2018). Selection of procedures in mental subtraction: Use of eye movements as a window on arithmetic processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 171-182. doi:10.1037/cep0000127Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2008). Effects of problem size, operation, and working-memory span on simple-arithmetic strategies: differences between children and adults? Psychological Research, 72(3), 331-346. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0112-8Jahanshahi, M., Obeso, I., Rothwell, J. C., & Obeso, J. A. (2015). A fronto–striato–subthalamic–pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(12), 719-732. doi:10.1038/nrn4038Jerman, M. (1974). Problem length as a structural variable in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(1), 109-123. doi:10.1007/BF00684692Kaput, J. J. (1979). Mathematics andlearning: Roots of epistemological status. In J. Clement & J. Lochhead (Eds.), Cognitive Process Instruction (pp. 289-303). Philadephia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.Kawashima, R., Taira, M., Okita, K., Inoue, K., Tajima, N., Yoshida, H., . . . Fukuda, H. (2004). A functional MRI study of simple arithmetic–a comparison between children and adults. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(3), 227-233. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14741309Kelly, A. M. C., Uddin, L. Q., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2008). Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. Neuroimage, 39(1), 527-537. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.008Kim, C., Kroger, J. K., Calhoun, V. D., & Clark, V. P. (2015). The role of the frontopolar cortex in manipulation of integrated information in working memory. Neuroscience Letters, 595, 25-29. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.044Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2014). Error Analysis of Mathematical Word Problem Solving Across Students with and without Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 66-74. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12029Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109-129. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.109Ko, C.-H., Yen, J.-Y., Yen, C.-F., Chen, C.-S., Lin, W.-C., Wang, P.-W., & Liu, G.-C. (2013). Brain activation deficit in increased-load working memory tasks among adults with ADHD using fMRI. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 263(7), 561-573. doi:10.1007/s00406-013-0407-2Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129-164. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1Lean, G. A., Clements, M. A., & Del Campo, G. (1990). Linguistic and pedagogical factors affecting children`s understanding of arithmetic word problems: A comparative study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(2), 165-191. doi:10.1007/BF00304900Lee, K., Lim, Z. Y., Yeong, S. H., Ng, S. F., Venkatraman, V., & Chee, M. W. (2007). Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: neuroanatomical correlates. Brain Research, 1155, 163-171. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.040LeFevre, J.-A., & Morris, J. (1999). More on the relation between division and multiplication in simple arithmetic: Evidence for mediation of division solutions via multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 803-812. doi:10.3758/BF03198533LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 216-230. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.216Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2011). Age-related changes in children`s executive functions and strategy selection: A study in computational estimation. Cognitive Development, 26(3), 282-294. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.01.002Lepik, M. (1990). Algebraic word problems: Role of linguistic and structural variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 83-90. doi:10.1007/BF00311017Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students` miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 363-371. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.363Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701-708. doi:10.1037/a0032625Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333-368.Mastrothanasis, K., Geladari, A., Zervoudakis, K., & Strakalis, P. (2018). Primary school pupils` strategies for mental addition and subtraction computations. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(8), 43-56. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/August-2018/04.pdfMayer, R. E. (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives (pp. 123-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Menon, V. (2014). Arithmetic in the child and adult brain. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mathematical Cognition: Oxford University Press.Menon, V. (2016). Memory and cognitive control circuits in mathematical cognition and learning. In M. Cappelletti & W. Fias (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 227, pp. 159-186): Elsevier.Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5-6), 655-667. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0Metcalfe, A. W. S., Ashkenazi, S., Rosenberg-Lee, M., & Menon, V. (2013). Fractionating the neural correlates of individual working memory components underlying arithmetic problem solving skills in children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 162-175. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.10.001Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167-202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167Mock, J., Huber, S., Bloechle, J., Dietrich, J. F., Bahnmueller, J., Rennig, J., . . . Moeller, K. (2018). Magnitude processing of symbolic and non-symbolic proportions: an fMRI study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 14(1), 9. doi:10.1186/s12993-018-0141-zMädamürk, K., Kikas, E., & Palu, A. (2018). Calculation and word problem-solving skill profiles: relationship to previous skills and interest. Educational Psychology, 38(10), 1239-1254. doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1495830Molko, N., Cachia, A., Rivière, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bihan, D., . . . Dehaene, S. (2003). Functional and Structural Alterations of the Intraparietal Sulcus in a Developmental Dyscalculia of Genetic Origin. Neuron, 40(4), 847-858. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00670-6Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2012). Thought beyond language: neural dissociation of algebra and natural language. Psychological Science, 23(8), 914-922. doi:10.1177/0956797612437427Muth, K. D. (1992). Extraneous information and extra steps in arithmetic word problems. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(3), 278-285. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(92)90066-8National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Nesher, P. (1976). Three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(4), 369-388. doi:10.1007/BF00452220Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 41-51. doi:10.1007/bf00590023Newman, S. D., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., Roth, J., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca’s area. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(2), 297-307. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00285-9Newman, S. D., Pruce, B., Rusia, A., & Burns Jr., T. (2010). The effect of strategy on problem solving: an fMRI study. The Journal of Problem Solving, 3(1). doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1076Newman, S. D., Willoughby, G., & Pruce, B. (2011). The effect of problem structure on problem-solving: an fMRI study of word versus number problems. Brain Research, 1410, 77-88. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.053Ni, W., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Shaywitz, S. E., . . . Shankweiler, D. (2000). An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 120-133. doi:10.1162/08989290051137648Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185-208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., & Willoughby, G. (2015). Multi-digit number processing: overview, conceptual clarifications, and language influences. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Revised ed. Vol. I): OECD.Orrantia, J., & Múñez, D. (2013). Arithmetic word problem solving: evidence for a magnitude-based mental representation. Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 98-108. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0241-1Orrantia, J., Rodríguez, L., & Vicente, S. (2010). Automatic activation of addition facts in arithmetic word problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 310-319. doi:10.1080/17470210902903020Ostad, S. A. (1998). Developmental Differences in Solving Simple Arithmetic Word Problems and Simple Number-fact Problems: A Comparison of Mathematically Normal and Mathematically Disabled Children. Mathematical Cognition, 4(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/135467998387389Pape, S. J. (2003). Compare word problems: Consistency hypothesis revisited. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 396-421. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00046-2Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-Term Memory, Working Memory, and Inhibitory Control in Children with Difficulties in Arithmetic Problem Solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(1), 44-57. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2626Peters, G., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Children`s use of addition to solve two-digit subtraction problems. British Journal of Psychology, 104(4), 495-511. doi:10.1111/bjop.12003Peters, L., & De Smedt, B. (2018). Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 265-279. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.05.002Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547-555. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Riviere, D., & LeBihan, D. (2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1013-1026. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0913Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2014). Does Early Algebraic Reasoning Differ as a Function of Students` Difficulty with Calculations versus Word Problems? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(3), 106-116. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12037Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., & Changas, P. C. (2015). Effects of a Multitier Support System on Calculation, Word Problem, and Prealgebraic Performance Among At-Risk Learners. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 443-470. doi:10.1177/0014402914563702Prabhakaran, V., Rypma, B., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Neural substrates of mathematical reasoning: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neocortical activation during performance of the necessary arithmetic operations test. Neuropsychology, 15(1), 115-127. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11216882Raduan, I. H. (2010). Error analysis and the corresponding cognitive activities committed by year five primary students in solving mathematical word problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3836-3838. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.600Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 110-122. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49-101. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0501_2Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children`s problem solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The Development of Mathematical Thinking (pp. 153-196). New York: Academic Press.Rosenberg-Lee, M., Chang, T. T., Young, C. B., Wu, S., & Menon, V. (2011). Functional dissociations between four basic arithmetic operations in the human posterior parietal cortex: A cytoarchitectonic mapping study. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2592-2608. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.035Scheperjans, F., Eickhoff, S. B., Homke, L., Mohlberg, H., Hermann, K., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2008). Probabilistic maps, morphometry, and variability of cytoarchitectonic areas in the human superior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 2141-2157. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm241Schumacher, R. F., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Does understanding relational terminology mediate effects of intervention on compare word problems? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 607-628. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.001Searle, B. W., Lorton, P., & Suppes, P. (1974). Structural variables affecting CAI performance on arithmetic word problems of disadvantaged and deaf students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(1), 371-384. doi:10.1007/BF00684708Shaftel, J., Belton-Kocher, E., Glasnapp, D., & Poggio, J. (2006). The Impact of Language Characteristics in Mathematics Test Items on the Performance of English Language Learners and Students With Disabilities. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 105-126. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1102_2Shenhav, A., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2016). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 1286. doi:10.1038/nn.4384Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P.-F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: A brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. Brain, 123(11), 2240-2255. doi:10.1093/brain/123.11.2240Supekar, K., & Menon, V. (2012). Developmental maturation of dynamic causal control signals in higher-order cognition: a neurocognitive network model. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(2), e1002374. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002374Swanson, H. L., Cooney, J. B., & Brock, S. (1993). The Influence of Working Memory and Classification Ability on Children′s Word Problem Solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55(3), 374-395. doi:10.1006/jecp.1993.1021Swanson, H. L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2008). Growth in working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 343-379. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.343Thevenot, C., Devidal, M., Barrouillet, P., & Fayol, M. (2007). Why does placing the question before an arithmetic word problem improve performance? A situation model account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 43-56. doi:10.1080/17470210600587927Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The strategic use of alternative representations in arithmetic word problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(7), 1311-1323. doi:10.1080/02724980443000593Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Acquisition and Use of Shortcut Strategies by Traditionally Schooled Children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(1), 1-17. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40284582Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K. S., Ryali, S., & Menon, V. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(50), 18578-18589. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011Van Beek, L., Ghesquièr, P., De Smedt, B., & Lagae, L. (2014). The arithmetic problem size effect in children: an event-related potential study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(756). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00756Vandierendonck, A. (2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 653-673. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0721-5Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer`s consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 85-94. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.85Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Influence of situational and conceptual rewording on word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 829-848. doi:10.1348/000709907x178200Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409-426. doi:10.1080/01443410701708228Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Cognitive and Linguistic Predictors of Mathematical Word Problems With and Without Irrelevant Information. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 79-87. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.015Weiss, Y., Cweigenberg, H. G., & Booth, J. R. (2018). Neural specialization of phonological and semantic processing in young children. Human Brain Mapping, 39(11), 4334-4348. doi:10.1002/hbm.24274Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 971-978. doi:10.1038/nn1727Wilcox, S., & Palermo, D. (1997). In, on under; more, less; some artifactrs revealed. Paper presented at the Eastern Psychologyical Association meetings, Boston.Woltz, D. J., & Was, C. A. (2006). Availability of related long-term memory during and after attention focus in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 34(3), 668-684. doi:10.3758/bf03193587Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8(8), 665-670. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635Yearp, B. H., & Kaur, B. (2001). Semantic characteristics that make arithmetic word problems difficult. Paper presented at the Numeracy and Beyond: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated, Australia.Zamarian, L., Ischebeck, A., & Delazer, M. (2009). Neuroscience of learning arithmetic—Evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(6), 909-925. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.005Zarnhofer, S., Braunstein, V., Ebner, F., Koschutnig, K., Neuper, C., Ninaus, M., . . . Ischebeck, A. (2013). Individual differences in solving arithmetic word problems. Behavioral and Brain Function, 9(1), 28. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-9-28Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In Handbook of Mathematical Cognition. (pp. 331-345). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.Zhang, S., & Li, C.-s. R. (2012). Functional networks for cognitive control in a stop signal task: Independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 33(1), 89-104. doi:10.1002/hbm.21197Zhou, X., Li, M., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Cui, J., Liu, J., & Chen, C. (2018). The semantic system is involved in mathematical problem solving. Neuroimage, 166, 360-370. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.017 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000130 en_US
