學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 製造服務化科技服務業者之價值創造
Value Creation of Servitization in Manufacturing Company作者 莊浩緯
Chuang, Hao-Wei貢獻者 李仁芳
Lee, Jen-Fang
莊浩緯
Chuang, Hao-Wei關鍵詞 製造服務化
知識密集服務業
科技服務業
服務價值
價值共創
知識管理
Manufacturing Servitization
Knowledge-Intensive Business Services
Science and Technology Service
Service Value
Value Co-creation
Knowledge Management日期 2019 上傳時間 6-Apr-2020 14:48:35 (UTC+8) 摘要 優質而踏實的造物作業，已然是台灣不可忽視的實力，製造業更佔台灣 GDP 31%，而品牌商在沒有製造業的協助下也無法完成可供消費者使用的終端產品。隨著全球製造能力和效率的躍進，經濟發展的典範從製造生產轉至服務作為，亦使代工為主的製造業廠商，透過長期產業知識和技術的累積，轉型成具有含量高專屬知識的科技服務業，運用其知識內涵到各項生活場景的服務，提供軟硬體加服務的解決方案。本研究以製造服務化的科技服務業者為核心研究對象，針對業者同時對品牌商與終端使用者進行的服務價值建構，探究業者對雙方所提供的市場價值、價值共創過程，以及製造服務化科技服務業者的內部執行與作為。透過「價值提升」、「價值共創」、「智慧資本」、「組織作為」四項分析構面為主軸，研究選擇兩家過去專職製造代工，且為該領域領導廠商，現行有提供相關應用的全面解決方案服務，進行深入的個案研究。經由分析與討論後獲得以下列結論：結論一：為滿足終端使用者使用上的情境價值：品牌商尋求製造服務化科技服務業者所擁有的專屬知識，補足己身較弱勢的技術領域，以回應終端使用者的評論；製造服務化的科技服務業者則在其一站式服務中，為產品加入多種使用情境模式，提升創新生活目標。結論二：製造服務化的科技服務業者利用資訊科技系統和實體互動，來加強三方的價值共創。與品牌商的價值共創互動，使雙方不同領域的知識，得快速且有效的進入產品和服務中；與終端消費者的價值共創互動，為產品和服務加入使用者意見，包含「溝通階段前」、「使用階段」的直接接觸，成為生產中修改的依據，和未來對品牌商「溝通階段」的資訊來源。結論三：製造服務化的科技服務業者由客戶資本和第四方專業知識提供者，建構不同類型產品的服務模式和智慧資本累積，造就由業者發貣商業模式的市場機會。創新中介者的角色帶來產品延伸的可能。結論四：組織作為、智慧資本、品牌商和終端消費者的價值共創，是相互雙向流通的，形成更完善的服務項目。相較於過去文獻多為知識密集服務業單點的服務建構，或業者與商業客戶、業者與消費者的雙向互動，本研究指出製造服務化的科技服務業者同時掌握品牌商客戶和終端使用者，三方價值共創的互動交流情形，及其角色定位和功能的重要性，和業者內部組織作為智慧資本累積的關聯性。
Strength of high-quality and practical manufacturing productivity cannot be ignored in Taiwan, and the manufacturing industry is around 31 percent of Taiwan`s GDP. However, own-brand owners cannot complete end products without the cooperation of the manufacturing industry. With the leaps in global manufacturing capabilities and efficiency, the paradigm of economic development has shifted from manufacturing to service. It also drives OEM and ODM to transform into science and technology service industry by the accumulation of long-term industrial knowledge and technical expertise. The technology service industry uses its knowledge to provide value creation service solutions for real life scenarios.This research puts manufacturing servitization company as the core, which does the value creation toward brand owners and end-users at the same time; the research aims at what are the manufacturing servitization company implementations and actions for own-brand owners and end-users. To in-depth studies, research framework based on two manufacturing servitization companies, which were the past leading manufacturer in their industry, with the four analysis perspective: Value Enhancement, Value Co-creation, Intellectual Capital, and Organization Behavior. After observation and discussion, here are the following conclusions:Conclusion 1: In order to meet the value-in-context of end-user use, brand owners seek exclusive knowledge from manufacturing servitization companies to make up their weaker areas. Manufacturing servitization companies try to add multiple usages of real-life scenarios in their one-stop service.Conclusion 2: The manufacturing servitization companies use information technology systems and interaction physically to enhance the value co-creation between three parties. Co-creating with brand owners that the knowledge of different fields in two parties can be entered into their products and services effectively; co-creating and interacting with the end consumers is to add user opinions into their products and services, including direct contact in the “Phase before Negotiation” and “Usage Phase”. Furthermore, the information also can be used for the cooperation process in “Negotiation Phase” next term.Conclusion 3: Manufacturing servitization companies construct service models and accumulate intellectual capital through customer capital and fourth-party expertise providers. Then, it creates the possibility to do the product extension and the business opportunities raising by the manufacturing servitization companies.Conclusion 4: The ways of construction comprehensive service combine by the bidirectional circulation between Organization Behavior, Intellectual Capital, and Value Co-creation with brand owners and end consumers.Compared with the previous literature, mostly focusing on the service construction in knowledge-intensive service industries, and the relationship between two parties, which are knowledge-intensive service operator and commercial customers or end consumers. This study indicates that manufacturing servitization companies master both brand customers and end-users in the same period. Moreover, describe the interactive communication process between three parties, and the position, organization behavior, accumulation of intellectual capital toward the manufacturing servitization companies.參考文獻 英文文獻Andersen, A., Productivity, A., & Center, Q. (1996). The knowledge management assessment tool: External benchmarking version. Chicago, IL.Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2016). Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, 139, 1011-1032.Babbie, E. R. (2015). The practice of social research: Nelson Education.Bell, D. (1976). The coming of the post-industrial society. Paper presented at the The Educational Forum.Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 482-497.Clemons, E. K., & Nunes, P. F. (2011). Carrying your long tail: Delighting your consumers and managing your operations. Decision support systems, 51(4), 884-893.Cooper, R. G. (2003). Profitable product innovation: the critical success factors. The international handbook on innovation, 139-157.Corti, D. (2015). Service business development–strategies for value creation in manufacturing firms: Taylor & Francis.Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 1-30.Davies, A., Brady, T., & Hobday, M. (2006). Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan management review, 47(3), 39.De Boer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of management studies, 36(3), 379-398.Den Hertog, P., & Bilderbeek, R. (2000). The New Knowledge Infrastructure: The Role of Technology-Based Knowledge-Intensive Business. Services and the knowledge-based economy, 222.Den Hertog, P., Van der Aa, W., & De Jong, M. W. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of service Management, 21(4), 490-514.DIGITIMES. (2015). C CORP. may reduce component orders for M9 by 30%, say sources.Doloreux, D., Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2008). Mapping Regional and Sectoral Characteristics of Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services: Evidence from the Province of Quebec (Canada). Growth and Change, 39(3), 464-496.Ferkiss, V. (1979). Daniel Bell`s concept of post-industrial society: theory, myth, and ideology. The Political Science Reviewer, 9, 61.Fernandez, I. B., Gonzalez, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2004). Knowledge Management–Challenges, Solutions and Technologies. Ney Jersey: Pearson Education.Goedkoop, M. J., Van Halen, C. J., Te Riele, H. R., & Rommens, P. J. (1999). Product service systems, ecological and economic basics. Report for Dutch Ministries of environment (VROM) and economic affairs (EZ), 36(1), 1-122.Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 41(2), 133-150.Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation-innovation in services.Hertog, P. d. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International journal of innovation management, 4(04), 491-528.Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard business review, 72(2), 164-174.Hipp, C., Gallego, J., & Rubalcaba, L. (2015). Shaping innovation in European knowledge-intensive business services. Service Business, 9(1), 41-55.Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of international business studies, 24(4), 625-645.Leonard, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing (pp. 21-46): Routledge.Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States (Vol. 278): Princeton university press.Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Huntink, W., & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services: their role as users, carriers and sources of innovation. Report to DG13 SPRINT-EIMS, PREST, Manchester, March, 29-30.Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. N. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis: Pearson Education Australia.Mont, O. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product–service system. Journal of cleaner production, 10(3), 237-245.Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research policy, 30(9), 1501-1516.Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company: Harvard Business Review Press.Nonaka, I. (2007). The Knowledge-Creating Company (pp. 162-171): Harvard Business Review.OECD. (1996). The Knowledge Based Economy. Paris: OECD Press.Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: John Wiley & Sons.Pires, G. D., Dean, A., & Rehman, M. (2015). Using service logic to redefine exchange in terms of customer and supplier participation. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 925-932.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of management, 33(3), 479-516.Sarvary, M. (1999). Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. California management review, 41(2), 95-107.Schön, O. (2012). Business model modularity–a way to gain strategic flexibility? Controlling & Management, 56(2), 73-78.Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 661-681.Smedlund, A., & Toivonen, M. (2007). The role of KIBS in the IC development of regional clusters. Journal of intellectual capital, 8(1), 159-170.Stabell, C. B., & Fjeldstad, Ø. D. (1998). Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strategic management journal, 19(5), 413-437.Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56-59.Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (2000). Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services Innovation systems in the service economy (pp. 43-68): Springer.Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California management review, 40(3), 55-79.Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.Tomlinson, M. (2002). Measuring competence and knowledge using employee surveys: evidence using the British skills survey of 1997: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester ….Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006). Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. Journal of cleaner production, 14(17), 1552-1556.Unger, R. M. (2018). The knowledge economy. London: Verso.Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. European management journal, 6(4), 314-324.Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152.Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management science, 40(4), 429-439.Wiig Aslesen, H., & Isaksen, A. (2007). Knowledge intensive business services and urban industrial development. The Service Industries Journal, 27(3), 321-338.Wise, R., & Baumgartner, P. (1999). Go downstream. Harvard business review, 77(5), 133-133.Wong, P.-K., & He, Z.-L. (2002). The impacts of knowledge interaction with manufacturing clients on KIBS firms innovation behaviour: WIDER Discussion Papers//World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER).Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods: Sage publications.中文文獻何冠廷, 陳弘源, 陳燦耀, 方冠榮, 張家欽. (2019). 儲能發展的勁旅─鋰離子電池. 科學發展(557), 60-65.林東清. (2007). 知識管理: 智勝文化出版.資策會. (2013). 智慧型手機購買因素分析.蔡敦浩, 李慶芳, 藍紫堂. (2003). 知識路徑圖：知識轉移的新模式. Paper presented at the 中華民國科技管理論文研討會, 台灣.K公司官方網站L公司官方網站K公司2016年年報L公司2016年年報Z品牌自行車廠官方網站網路文獻ePrice. Retrieved July 28,2019，fromhttps://www.eprice.com.tw/GSMARENA. Retrieved July 28,2019，fromhttps://www.gsmarena.com/Schaik, J.-W. v. (2019). E-Bike Now Biggest Category in the Netherlands Retrieved July 28,2019，from https://spanninga.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/E-Bike-Now-Biggest-Category-in-the-Netherlands-Bike-Europe.pdf公開資訊觀測站. Retrieved July 28,2019，fromhttps://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index王宜弘. (2018). L公司強攻資料中心BBU市場奪大單，明年高飛. Retrieved July 14,2019自行車筆記. (2017). Velo City 專訪：淺談電動輔助自行車. Retrieved July 14,2019，fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTE-hMNlSIw吳芳儀. (2018). 高速電動輔助自行車銷售穩定成長. Retrieved July 28,2019， from https://www.bike-eu.com/chinese-news/nieuws/2018/12/%E9%AB%98%E9%80%9F%E9%9B%BB%E5%8B%95%E8%BC%94%E5%8A%A9%E8%87%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%BB%8A%E9%8A%B7%E5%94%AE%E7%A9%A9%E5%AE%9A%E6%88%90%E9%95%B7-10135018?vakmedianet-approve-cookies=1&_ga=2.261851784.442120893.1563430425-1596799937.1563430425李仁芳. (2018). 台灣普拉斯. Retrieved July 19,2019，from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80393/post/201805090019/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%99%AE%E6%8B%89%E6%96%AF李立達. (2019). NB電池模組跨界資料中心 與電源供應器廠競合. Retrieved July 14,2019，from https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?cnlid=1&id=0000556821_W2V91GCB1X9OGJ2ME4627周柏憲. (2016). 全球熱銷智慧型手機前10名 台灣品牌佔3名. Retrieved July 17,2019，from https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/1586412林宏達, 陳前康. (2016). 超智慧車來了. Retrieved July 13,2019，from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80394/post/201601280038/%E8%B6%85%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E8%BB%8A%E4%BE%86%E4%BA%86科技傳媒. (2016). I手機品牌商 P9 國外銷量劇增 網傳今年銷售量目標下調了2000萬部. Retrieved July 23,2019孫建中, 鄭程鴻, 張良吉, 黃怡碩. (2010). 小容量鋰電池/模組與大容量動力電池/模組設計之差異. Retrieved July 14,2019，from https://www.materialsnet.com.tw/DocView.aspx?id=8334國票投顧. (2017). 自行車產業：隧道盡頭曙光現，成長量點要看見. Retrieved July 28,2019，from http://www.wls.com.tw/Support/EpaperConsulting/a9dd473d-ccf5-4b4d-9600-e4191f3e04f5/02162017_%E8%87%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%BB%8A%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf張欽發. (2018) . T軟體公司發表Vision AI解決方案與K公司共同開發. Retrieved July 13,2019產業拓展處. (2018). 歐洲及德國自行車市場概況及趨勢. Retrieved July 28,2019，from https://info.taiwantrade.com/biznews/%E6%AD%90%E6%B4%B2-%E5%BE%B7%E5%9C%8B-%E8%87%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%BB%8A%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81%E5%8F%8A%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2-1656028.html產業價值鏈資訊平台. (n.d.). 能源元件產業鏈簡介. Retrieved July 14,2019，from https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=E000創市際市場研究顧問. (2016). IX市調解析-智慧型手機篇. Retrieved July 17,2019，from https://rocket.cafe/talks/81764博思市調公司. (2018). 國人智慧型手機購買與使用行為市場調查 Retrieved July 16,2019，from https://www.pollread.com/2018/02/17/mobile_survey/經理人月刊. (2013) . L公司董事長~我有速度，我在第一線. Retrieved July 14,2019賈智龍. (2016). 雙鏡頭技術深入剖析. Retrieved July 13,2019，from https://techfeed.today/2016/09/06/%E9%9B%99%E9%8F%A1%E9%A0%AD%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E6%B7%B1%E5%85%A5%E5%89%96%E6%9E%90/劉怡妤. (2017). K公司轉往雙鏡頭解決方案添毛利. Retrieved July 16,2019數位時代. (2004). 3年賺3個資本額的L公司. Retrieved July 14,2019謝艾莉. (2018). L公司 業績來電. Retrieved July 23,2019韓婷婷. (2018) . K公司搭上T軟體公司S雲端服務公司等大廠 拚轉型契機. Retrieved July 13,2019 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
106364125資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364125 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 李仁芳 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lee, Jen-Fang en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 莊浩緯 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chuang, Hao-Wei en_US dc.creator (作者) 莊浩緯 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chuang, Hao-Wei en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-Apr-2020 14:48:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-Apr-2020 14:48:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Apr-2020 14:48:35 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106364125 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129234 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106364125 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 優質而踏實的造物作業，已然是台灣不可忽視的實力，製造業更佔台灣 GDP 31%，而品牌商在沒有製造業的協助下也無法完成可供消費者使用的終端產品。隨著全球製造能力和效率的躍進，經濟發展的典範從製造生產轉至服務作為，亦使代工為主的製造業廠商，透過長期產業知識和技術的累積，轉型成具有含量高專屬知識的科技服務業，運用其知識內涵到各項生活場景的服務，提供軟硬體加服務的解決方案。本研究以製造服務化的科技服務業者為核心研究對象，針對業者同時對品牌商與終端使用者進行的服務價值建構，探究業者對雙方所提供的市場價值、價值共創過程，以及製造服務化科技服務業者的內部執行與作為。透過「價值提升」、「價值共創」、「智慧資本」、「組織作為」四項分析構面為主軸，研究選擇兩家過去專職製造代工，且為該領域領導廠商，現行有提供相關應用的全面解決方案服務，進行深入的個案研究。經由分析與討論後獲得以下列結論：結論一：為滿足終端使用者使用上的情境價值：品牌商尋求製造服務化科技服務業者所擁有的專屬知識，補足己身較弱勢的技術領域，以回應終端使用者的評論；製造服務化的科技服務業者則在其一站式服務中，為產品加入多種使用情境模式，提升創新生活目標。結論二：製造服務化的科技服務業者利用資訊科技系統和實體互動，來加強三方的價值共創。與品牌商的價值共創互動，使雙方不同領域的知識，得快速且有效的進入產品和服務中；與終端消費者的價值共創互動，為產品和服務加入使用者意見，包含「溝通階段前」、「使用階段」的直接接觸，成為生產中修改的依據，和未來對品牌商「溝通階段」的資訊來源。結論三：製造服務化的科技服務業者由客戶資本和第四方專業知識提供者，建構不同類型產品的服務模式和智慧資本累積，造就由業者發貣商業模式的市場機會。創新中介者的角色帶來產品延伸的可能。結論四：組織作為、智慧資本、品牌商和終端消費者的價值共創，是相互雙向流通的，形成更完善的服務項目。相較於過去文獻多為知識密集服務業單點的服務建構，或業者與商業客戶、業者與消費者的雙向互動，本研究指出製造服務化的科技服務業者同時掌握品牌商客戶和終端使用者，三方價值共創的互動交流情形，及其角色定位和功能的重要性，和業者內部組織作為智慧資本累積的關聯性。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Strength of high-quality and practical manufacturing productivity cannot be ignored in Taiwan, and the manufacturing industry is around 31 percent of Taiwan`s GDP. However, own-brand owners cannot complete end products without the cooperation of the manufacturing industry. With the leaps in global manufacturing capabilities and efficiency, the paradigm of economic development has shifted from manufacturing to service. It also drives OEM and ODM to transform into science and technology service industry by the accumulation of long-term industrial knowledge and technical expertise. The technology service industry uses its knowledge to provide value creation service solutions for real life scenarios.This research puts manufacturing servitization company as the core, which does the value creation toward brand owners and end-users at the same time; the research aims at what are the manufacturing servitization company implementations and actions for own-brand owners and end-users. To in-depth studies, research framework based on two manufacturing servitization companies, which were the past leading manufacturer in their industry, with the four analysis perspective: Value Enhancement, Value Co-creation, Intellectual Capital, and Organization Behavior. After observation and discussion, here are the following conclusions:Conclusion 1: In order to meet the value-in-context of end-user use, brand owners seek exclusive knowledge from manufacturing servitization companies to make up their weaker areas. Manufacturing servitization companies try to add multiple usages of real-life scenarios in their one-stop service.Conclusion 2: The manufacturing servitization companies use information technology systems and interaction physically to enhance the value co-creation between three parties. Co-creating with brand owners that the knowledge of different fields in two parties can be entered into their products and services effectively; co-creating and interacting with the end consumers is to add user opinions into their products and services, including direct contact in the “Phase before Negotiation” and “Usage Phase”. Furthermore, the information also can be used for the cooperation process in “Negotiation Phase” next term.Conclusion 3: Manufacturing servitization companies construct service models and accumulate intellectual capital through customer capital and fourth-party expertise providers. Then, it creates the possibility to do the product extension and the business opportunities raising by the manufacturing servitization companies.Conclusion 4: The ways of construction comprehensive service combine by the bidirectional circulation between Organization Behavior, Intellectual Capital, and Value Co-creation with brand owners and end consumers.Compared with the previous literature, mostly focusing on the service construction in knowledge-intensive service industries, and the relationship between two parties, which are knowledge-intensive service operator and commercial customers or end consumers. This study indicates that manufacturing servitization companies master both brand customers and end-users in the same period. Moreover, describe the interactive communication process between three parties, and the position, organization behavior, accumulation of intellectual capital toward the manufacturing servitization companies. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景 1第二節 研究動機 3第三節 研究目的與問題 4第四節 論文架構與研究流程 5第二章 文獻探討 6第一節 科技服務業相關研究 7第二節 服務價值創造 18第三節 價值共創 30第四節 知識管理 35第五節 本章小結 44第三章 研究方法 47第一節 研究架構 47第二節 研究變數說明 48第三節 研究設計 51第四章 個案研究 56第一節 K 公司個案 56第二節 L 公司個案 75第五章 研究討論與發現 91第一節 K 公司個案分析 91第二節 L 公司個案分析 101第三節 個案公司分析整理110第四節 研究發現與討論 117第六章 研究結論與建議 130第一節 研究結論 130第二節 研究貢獻 134第三節 後續研究建議 137第四節 研究限制 138參考文獻 139英文文獻 139中文文獻 145網路文獻 146 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4509220 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364125 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 製造服務化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識密集服務業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科技服務業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 服務價值 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 價值共創 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識管理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Manufacturing Servitization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Knowledge-Intensive Business Services en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Science and Technology Service en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Service Value en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Value Co-creation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Knowledge Management en_US dc.title (題名) 製造服務化科技服務業者之價值創造 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Value Creation of Servitization in Manufacturing Company en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文文獻Andersen, A., Productivity, A., & Center, Q. (1996). The knowledge management assessment tool: External benchmarking version. Chicago, IL.Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2016). Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, 139, 1011-1032.Babbie, E. R. (2015). The practice of social research: Nelson Education.Bell, D. (1976). The coming of the post-industrial society. Paper presented at the The Educational Forum.Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 482-497.Clemons, E. K., & Nunes, P. F. (2011). Carrying your long tail: Delighting your consumers and managing your operations. Decision support systems, 51(4), 884-893.Cooper, R. G. (2003). Profitable product innovation: the critical success factors. The international handbook on innovation, 139-157.Corti, D. (2015). Service business development–strategies for value creation in manufacturing firms: Taylor & Francis.Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 1-30.Davies, A., Brady, T., & Hobday, M. (2006). Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan management review, 47(3), 39.De Boer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of management studies, 36(3), 379-398.Den Hertog, P., & Bilderbeek, R. (2000). The New Knowledge Infrastructure: The Role of Technology-Based Knowledge-Intensive Business. Services and the knowledge-based economy, 222.Den Hertog, P., Van der Aa, W., & De Jong, M. W. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of service Management, 21(4), 490-514.DIGITIMES. (2015). C CORP. may reduce component orders for M9 by 30%, say sources.Doloreux, D., Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2008). Mapping Regional and Sectoral Characteristics of Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services: Evidence from the Province of Quebec (Canada). Growth and Change, 39(3), 464-496.Ferkiss, V. (1979). Daniel Bell`s concept of post-industrial society: theory, myth, and ideology. The Political Science Reviewer, 9, 61.Fernandez, I. B., Gonzalez, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2004). Knowledge Management–Challenges, Solutions and Technologies. Ney Jersey: Pearson Education.Goedkoop, M. J., Van Halen, C. J., Te Riele, H. R., & Rommens, P. J. (1999). Product service systems, ecological and economic basics. Report for Dutch Ministries of environment (VROM) and economic affairs (EZ), 36(1), 1-122.Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 41(2), 133-150.Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation-innovation in services.Hertog, P. d. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International journal of innovation management, 4(04), 491-528.Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard business review, 72(2), 164-174.Hipp, C., Gallego, J., & Rubalcaba, L. (2015). Shaping innovation in European knowledge-intensive business services. Service Business, 9(1), 41-55.Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of international business studies, 24(4), 625-645.Leonard, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing (pp. 21-46): Routledge.Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States (Vol. 278): Princeton university press.Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Huntink, W., & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services: their role as users, carriers and sources of innovation. Report to DG13 SPRINT-EIMS, PREST, Manchester, March, 29-30.Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. N. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis: Pearson Education Australia.Mont, O. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product–service system. Journal of cleaner production, 10(3), 237-245.Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research policy, 30(9), 1501-1516.Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company: Harvard Business Review Press.Nonaka, I. (2007). The Knowledge-Creating Company (pp. 162-171): Harvard Business Review.OECD. (1996). The Knowledge Based Economy. Paris: OECD Press.Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: John Wiley & Sons.Pires, G. D., Dean, A., & Rehman, M. (2015). Using service logic to redefine exchange in terms of customer and supplier participation. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 925-932.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of management, 33(3), 479-516.Sarvary, M. (1999). Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. California management review, 41(2), 95-107.Schön, O. (2012). Business model modularity–a way to gain strategic flexibility? Controlling & Management, 56(2), 73-78.Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 661-681.Smedlund, A., & Toivonen, M. (2007). The role of KIBS in the IC development of regional clusters. Journal of intellectual capital, 8(1), 159-170.Stabell, C. B., & Fjeldstad, Ø. D. (1998). Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strategic management journal, 19(5), 413-437.Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56-59.Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (2000). Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services Innovation systems in the service economy (pp. 43-68): Springer.Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California management review, 40(3), 55-79.Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.Tomlinson, M. (2002). Measuring competence and knowledge using employee surveys: evidence using the British skills survey of 1997: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester ….Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006). Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. Journal of cleaner production, 14(17), 1552-1556.Unger, R. M. (2018). The knowledge economy. London: Verso.Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. European management journal, 6(4), 314-324.Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152.Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management science, 40(4), 429-439.Wiig Aslesen, H., & Isaksen, A. (2007). Knowledge intensive business services and urban industrial development. The Service Industries Journal, 27(3), 321-338.Wise, R., & Baumgartner, P. (1999). Go downstream. Harvard business review, 77(5), 133-133.Wong, P.-K., & He, Z.-L. (2002). The impacts of knowledge interaction with manufacturing clients on KIBS firms innovation behaviour: WIDER Discussion Papers//World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER).Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods: Sage publications.中文文獻何冠廷, 陳弘源, 陳燦耀, 方冠榮, 張家欽. (2019). 儲能發展的勁旅─鋰離子電池. 科學發展(557), 60-65.林東清. (2007). 知識管理: 智勝文化出版.資策會. (2013). 智慧型手機購買因素分析.蔡敦浩, 李慶芳, 藍紫堂. (2003). 知識路徑圖：知識轉移的新模式. Paper presented at the 中華民國科技管理論文研討會, 台灣.K公司官方網站L公司官方網站K公司2016年年報L公司2016年年報Z品牌自行車廠官方網站網路文獻ePrice. Retrieved July 28,2019，fromhttps://www.eprice.com.tw/GSMARENA. Retrieved July 28,2019，fromhttps://www.gsmarena.com/Schaik, J.-W. v. (2019). E-Bike Now Biggest Category in the Netherlands Retrieved July 28,2019，from https://spanninga.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/E-Bike-Now-Biggest-Category-in-the-Netherlands-Bike-Europe.pdf公開資訊觀測站. Retrieved July 28,2019，fromhttps://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index王宜弘. (2018). L公司強攻資料中心BBU市場奪大單，明年高飛. Retrieved July 14,2019自行車筆記. (2017). Velo City 專訪：淺談電動輔助自行車. Retrieved July 14,2019，fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTE-hMNlSIw吳芳儀. (2018). 高速電動輔助自行車銷售穩定成長. Retrieved July 28,2019， from https://www.bike-eu.com/chinese-news/nieuws/2018/12/%E9%AB%98%E9%80%9F%E9%9B%BB%E5%8B%95%E8%BC%94%E5%8A%A9%E8%87%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%BB%8A%E9%8A%B7%E5%94%AE%E7%A9%A9%E5%AE%9A%E6%88%90%E9%95%B7-10135018?vakmedianet-approve-cookies=1&_ga=2.261851784.442120893.1563430425-1596799937.1563430425李仁芳. (2018). 台灣普拉斯. Retrieved July 19,2019，from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80393/post/201805090019/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%99%AE%E6%8B%89%E6%96%AF李立達. (2019). NB電池模組跨界資料中心 與電源供應器廠競合. Retrieved July 14,2019，from https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?cnlid=1&id=0000556821_W2V91GCB1X9OGJ2ME4627周柏憲. (2016). 全球熱銷智慧型手機前10名 台灣品牌佔3名. Retrieved July 17,2019，from https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/1586412林宏達, 陳前康. (2016). 超智慧車來了. Retrieved July 13,2019，from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80394/post/201601280038/%E8%B6%85%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E8%BB%8A%E4%BE%86%E4%BA%86科技傳媒. (2016). I手機品牌商 P9 國外銷量劇增 網傳今年銷售量目標下調了2000萬部. Retrieved July 23,2019孫建中, 鄭程鴻, 張良吉, 黃怡碩. (2010). 小容量鋰電池/模組與大容量動力電池/模組設計之差異. Retrieved July 14,2019，from https://www.materialsnet.com.tw/DocView.aspx?id=8334國票投顧. (2017). 自行車產業：隧道盡頭曙光現，成長量點要看見. Retrieved July 28,2019，from http://www.wls.com.tw/Support/EpaperConsulting/a9dd473d-ccf5-4b4d-9600-e4191f3e04f5/02162017_%E8%87%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%BB%8A%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf張欽發. (2018) . T軟體公司發表Vision AI解決方案與K公司共同開發. Retrieved July 13,2019產業拓展處. (2018). 歐洲及德國自行車市場概況及趨勢. Retrieved July 28,2019，from https://info.taiwantrade.com/biznews/%E6%AD%90%E6%B4%B2-%E5%BE%B7%E5%9C%8B-%E8%87%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%BB%8A%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81%E5%8F%8A%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2-1656028.html產業價值鏈資訊平台. (n.d.). 能源元件產業鏈簡介. Retrieved July 14,2019，from https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=E000創市際市場研究顧問. (2016). IX市調解析-智慧型手機篇. Retrieved July 17,2019，from https://rocket.cafe/talks/81764博思市調公司. (2018). 國人智慧型手機購買與使用行為市場調查 Retrieved July 16,2019，from https://www.pollread.com/2018/02/17/mobile_survey/經理人月刊. (2013) . L公司董事長~我有速度，我在第一線. Retrieved July 14,2019賈智龍. (2016). 雙鏡頭技術深入剖析. Retrieved July 13,2019，from https://techfeed.today/2016/09/06/%E9%9B%99%E9%8F%A1%E9%A0%AD%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E6%B7%B1%E5%85%A5%E5%89%96%E6%9E%90/劉怡妤. (2017). K公司轉往雙鏡頭解決方案添毛利. Retrieved July 16,2019數位時代. (2004). 3年賺3個資本額的L公司. Retrieved July 14,2019謝艾莉. (2018). L公司 業績來電. Retrieved July 23,2019韓婷婷. (2018) . K公司搭上T軟體公司S雲端服務公司等大廠 拚轉型契機. Retrieved July 13,2019 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000366 en_US
