Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases: Harmonization by multiplication
作者 何萬順
Her, One-Soon
Tang*, Macr
Li, Bing-Tsiong
貢獻者 語言所
關鍵詞 classifier ; multiplication ; numeral base ; harmonization
日期 2018-12
上傳時間 20-Jun-2020 14:07:59 (UTC+8)
摘要 In a numeral classifier language, a sortal classifier (C) or a mensural classifier (M) is needed when a noun is quantified by a numeral (Num). Greenberg (1990b, p. 185) first observes that cross-linguistically Num and C/M are adjacent, either in a [Num C/M] order or [C/M Num]. Likewise, in a complex numeral with a multiplicative composition, the base may follow the multiplier as in [n × base], e.g., san-bai ‘three hundred’ in Standard Mandarin. However, the base may precede the multiplier, thus [base × n], which is also attested. Greenberg (1990a, p. 293) further observes that [n × base] numerals appear with a [Num C/M] alignment and [base × n] numerals with [C/M Num]; base and C/M thus seem to harmonize in word order. This paper first motivates the base-C/M harmonization via the multiplicative theory of classifiers (Her, 2012a, 2017a), and verifies it empirically within six language groups in the world’s foremost hotbed of classifier languages: Sinitic, Miao-Yao, Austro-Asiatic, Tai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, and Indo-Aryan. Our survey further reveals two interesting facts: base-initial ([base × n]) and C/M-initial ([C/M Num]) orders exist only in Tibeto-Burman (TB) within our dataset and so are the few scarce violations to the base-C/M harmonization. We offer an explanation based on Proto-TB’s base-initial numerals and language contact with neighboring base-final, C/M-final languages.
關聯 STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 72:3
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0017
dc.contributor 語言所
dc.creator (作者) 何萬順
dc.creator (作者) Her, One-Soon
dc.creator (作者) Tang*, Macr
dc.creator (作者) Li, Bing-Tsiong
dc.date (日期) 2018-12
dc.date.accessioned 20-Jun-2020 14:07:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-Jun-2020 14:07:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-Jun-2020 14:07:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130093-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In a numeral classifier language, a sortal classifier (C) or a mensural classifier (M) is needed when a noun is quantified by a numeral (Num). Greenberg (1990b, p. 185) first observes that cross-linguistically Num and C/M are adjacent, either in a [Num C/M] order or [C/M Num]. Likewise, in a complex numeral with a multiplicative composition, the base may follow the multiplier as in [n × base], e.g., san-bai ‘three hundred’ in Standard Mandarin. However, the base may precede the multiplier, thus [base × n], which is also attested. Greenberg (1990a, p. 293) further observes that [n × base] numerals appear with a [Num C/M] alignment and [base × n] numerals with [C/M Num]; base and C/M thus seem to harmonize in word order. This paper first motivates the base-C/M harmonization via the multiplicative theory of classifiers (Her, 2012a, 2017a), and verifies it empirically within six language groups in the world’s foremost hotbed of classifier languages: Sinitic, Miao-Yao, Austro-Asiatic, Tai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, and Indo-Aryan. Our survey further reveals two interesting facts: base-initial ([base × n]) and C/M-initial ([C/M Num]) orders exist only in Tibeto-Burman (TB) within our dataset and so are the few scarce violations to the base-C/M harmonization. We offer an explanation based on Proto-TB’s base-initial numerals and language contact with neighboring base-final, C/M-final languages.
dc.format.extent 612052 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 72:3
dc.subject (關鍵詞) classifier ; multiplication ; numeral base ; harmonization
dc.title (題名) Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases: Harmonization by multiplication
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1515/stuf-2019-0017
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0017