1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Periodical Articles
  5. Item

Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 The Contradiction and Reconciliation of Informational Self-determination and Copyright in the Management of Medical Records
作者 黃天偉
Hwang, Tien-Wei
貢獻者 會計博二
關鍵詞 Electronic Medical Records (EMR) ;  copyright of medical records ;  duplications of the personal information  ;  reasonable use of copyright
日期 2015-09
上傳時間 30-Jul-2020 14:35:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 When medical institutions put resources into electronic medical records (EMR), it is important to pay attention to the system design and the channel through which patients can apply for duplicate EMR. Judging from the opinions of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of ＂Primary Health Care Limited v Commissioner of Taxation＂, it is difficult for physicians to obtain copyrights of medical records (MR). As the use of EMR mandates that physicians comply with system requirements for MR, it was even more difficult for the court to agree that physicians have infused intellectual property into EMR. The question of whether physicians own MR copyrights will be a factor in deciding the channel through which copies of MR can be made available to patients. This article will explore future development of EMR based on the Medical Service Act, the Freedom of Government Information Law, the Personal Information Protection Act and the Copyright Act, so that physicians are aware that they may not hold the copyright of EMR.
關聯 Journal of Medical Education, Vol.19, No.3, pp.144-152
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.6145/jme201513
dc.contributor 會計博二
dc.creator (作者) 黃天偉
dc.creator (作者) Hwang, Tien-Wei
dc.date (日期) 2015-09
dc.date.accessioned 30-Jul-2020 14:35:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-Jul-2020 14:35:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Jul-2020 14:35:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130844-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) When medical institutions put resources into electronic medical records (EMR), it is important to pay attention to the system design and the channel through which patients can apply for duplicate EMR. Judging from the opinions of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of ＂Primary Health Care Limited v Commissioner of Taxation＂, it is difficult for physicians to obtain copyrights of medical records (MR). As the use of EMR mandates that physicians comply with system requirements for MR, it was even more difficult for the court to agree that physicians have infused intellectual property into EMR. The question of whether physicians own MR copyrights will be a factor in deciding the channel through which copies of MR can be made available to patients. This article will explore future development of EMR based on the Medical Service Act, the Freedom of Government Information Law, the Personal Information Protection Act and the Copyright Act, so that physicians are aware that they may not hold the copyright of EMR.
dc.format.extent 259567 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Medical Education, Vol.19, No.3, pp.144-152
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Electronic Medical Records (EMR) ;  copyright of medical records ;  duplications of the personal information  ;  reasonable use of copyright
dc.title (題名) The Contradiction and Reconciliation of Informational Self-determination and Copyright in the Management of Medical Records
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6145/jme201513
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.6145/jme201513