學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 走一條不同的路:自學生的自學經驗與生涯抉擇之敘說研究
Taking a Different Route:The Narrative Inquiry in Self-learning Experience and Career Decision-making of Individual Experimental Education Students.
作者 周皓偉
Chou, Hao-Wei
貢獻者 鄭同僚
Cheng, Tung-Liao
周皓偉
Chou, Hao-Wei
關鍵詞 自學經驗
生涯抉擇歷程
敘說研究
英雄之旅
Self-learning
Career decision-making process
Narrative research
Hero`s Journey
日期 2020
上傳時間 3-Aug-2020 18:23:17 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文旨在了解影響自學生生涯抉擇的重要因素以及自學生的生涯抉擇歷程。本研究透過三位研究參與者,進行每人3-4小時的深度質性訪談,並以敘說研究中的「整體-內容」和「類別-內容」進行分析。
研究者綜合三位研究參與者的生命故事,分析出研究參與者自學經驗中影響生涯抉擇的重要因素,有四個層面:
一、環境層面
(一)社會變遷快速;(二)網際網路的發達;(三)實驗教育相關政策興起
二、學校層面
生命中的貴人協助與引領
三、家庭層面
家庭成員之間的互動氣氛
四、個人層面
(一)自我調整的學習能力;(二)自我照顧的復原力;(三)保持彈性與創造力
研究參與者在走過的自學生涯抉擇旅程可以分成三階段九個主題:
(一)自學之前:1.個體與環境不適應;2.自我掙扎;3.分離
(二)自學當下:4.展開冒險;5.危機;6.習得寶藏;7.回歸
(三)自學之後:8.全新的自己;9.堅持或調整原有的目標
最後,研究者對研究限制、未來研究、教育實務現場的工作者以及欲走上自學這條路的孩子與家長提出相關建議。
The purpose of this study is to understand factors and process of self-learning students’ experience on career decision-making. This study adopted in-depth interview as the major research method. Three participants were interviewed and each lasted 3-4 hours. The data were analyzed through “holistic-content” and “categorical-content” approaches from narrative research.
From three participants’ life story, the researchers attempts to the factors which affect participants’ career decision-making in their self-learning experience. Four important parts are presented as follows.
1. Environmental level
(a) rapid social changes;(b) the development of the Internet;(c) the rise of experimental education related policies.
2. School level
assistance and guidance of the benefactors in life.
3. Family level
the atmosphere and interaction among family members.
4. Personal level
(a) self-adjustinged learning ability;(b) self-healing ability;(c) flexibilityle and creativitye
The participants’ journey of decision-making in self-learning experience can be divided into three stages and nine themes.
1. Before self- learning: (a) the individual does not adapt to the environment;(b) self-struggles;(c) separation.
2. During self- learning: (d) embark on an adventure;(e) trials;(f) get treasure;(g) return.
3. After self- learning:(h) a whole new self;(i) stick to or adjust the original goal. Finally, the study gave suggestions to those who are interested in this field and children and parents who want to do self-learning. Research restriction of this study was also pointed out.
參考文獻 壹、中文文獻
Yes123求職網(2017)。人生志願選填與職場溫拿魯蛇調查。取自:
https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/article.asp?id=20170718144909
丁凡譯(2016)。用「自主學習」來翻轉教育!沒有課表、沒有分數的
瑟谷學校(Daniel Greenberg著)。台北:樹橡林。
王勇智、鄧明宇譯(2017)。敘說分析(Riessman, C. K. 著)。台北:五南。
王玉珍、吳麗琴(2009)。大一生回顧升學生涯抉擇與生涯適應之脈絡相互影響
模式探究。中華輔導與諮商學報,25,39-79。
方慧琴(2002)。台北市實施在家自行教育之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育 研究所碩士論文,臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4h8u45
田秀蘭(1998)。男女大學生生涯阻礙因素之分析研究。教育心理學報,30(1), 133-148。
田秀蘭(2015)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北:學富文化。
包媖子(2013)。在家自行教育與學校教育學生學習適應、幸福感之比較研究。 國立新竹教育大學人資處教育心理與諮商碩士專班碩士論文,新竹市。 取 自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hqy4un
江玉娟、趙善如(2007)。原住民部落少年的生涯成熟與未來生涯抉擇-以屏東
縣少年為例。東吳社會工作學報,(16),79-122。
成虹飛(2005)。乘著歌聲的翅膀:「飛」越敘說與課程實踐。教育研究月刊,129,
5-13。
李明昌(2004)。在家教育法制化之研究。輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文,新 北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jy848b
李雅卿(2006)。自主學習的理念與實踐。品質月刊,42(10),54-57。
何粵東(2005)。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理研究,25,55-72。
吳芝儀(2000)。生涯輔導與諮商:理論與實務。嘉義:濤石。
吳清山(2011)。自學生的平等受教權。師友月刊,534,47-52。
吳武典、盧台華、王振德、陳龍安(1990)。國民教育階段身心障礙兒童安置狀 況調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,6,1-18。
吳武典(1994)。我國身心障礙兒童教育安置之檢討。師大學報,39,134-181。
林怡青(2001)。國三學生選擇入學學校之抉擇歷程與其影響因素。中華輔導學 報,11,71-123。
林純真(2018)。實驗教育三法鬆綁教育體制後,在家自學的趨勢。臺灣教育評
論月刊,7(1),96-102。
邱愉容(2008)。國小高年級學生父母期望知覺與自我調整學習之相關研究(未出 版之碩士論文)。東華大學,花蓮市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/74wc49
兒盟資料館(2018)。2018年兒童幸福感調查。取自: https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/67/1353
金樹人、林清山、田秀蘭(1989)。我國大專生生涯發展定向之研究。教育心理
學報,22,167-190
金樹人(2010)。 心理位移研究的趣與味:自性化過程的實踐。輔導季刊,47(2), 1-6。
金樹人(2011)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北:東華。
洪美鈴、郭豐榮(2017)。拒學現象之生態系統觀點。諮商與輔導,(380),31-37。
柯晏邾譯(2013)。流浪者之歌( Hermann Hesse著)。台北:遠流。
秦夢群(2015)。教育選擇權研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版。
唐光華(2016)。多元化的臺灣在家自學教育模式─實驗教育個案週課表比較分
析。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,5。
唐傳義、鄭曉芬(2019)。大學考招制度變革與高中教育之關聯。台灣教育(715),
63-68。
教育部統計處(2015)。中華民國教育統計民國104年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2016)。中華民國教育統計民國105年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2017)。中華民國教育統計民國106年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2018)。中華民國教育統計民國107年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2019)。中華民國教育統計民國108年版。臺北市:教育部。
許玉芳(2008)。國小學童的教師期望、父母期望與自我效能、學業成就之相關
研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f28w23
許素梅(2003)。平常心看待在家教育。師友月刊,429,21-22。
黃光國(2009)。本土心理學的知識論目標。黃光國編,儒家關係主義-哲學反
思、理論建構與實徵研究(2-24頁)。台北:心理。
黃淑惠(2005)。國小高年級學童知覺父親教養方式、教育期望與親子關係之模
式探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/35q568
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南出版社。
陳勇祥、張昇鵬(2015)。二位藝術才能資賦優異成人回顧其生涯歷程與生涯抉
擇之思考及論述。資優教育季刊,(135),9-16。
陳煒婷(2015)。偏遠地區原住民青少年生涯資本與生涯抉擇之相關性研究。東
海大學社會工作學系碩士論文,台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8vdt3e
陳慧潔(2015)。有了夢想,然後呢?。台北:格子外面。
陳怡光、張瀞文(2017)。選擇自學,必備4要點。親子天下雜誌,29,132-133。
陳德蓉(2007)。在家教育課程與教學之研究-以中南部某家庭為例。國立嘉義大 學國民教育研究所碩士論文,嘉義市。 取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ercea5
陳淑英(2006)。論父母在家教育權-教育行政的鬆綁與再規範。學校行政,42, 79-89。
莊明貞(2010)。敘事探究:課程與教學的應用。台北:心理。
張曉佩、卓秀足譯(2018)。理解敘說探究(Jeong-Hee Kim著)。台北:心理。
張碧如(2006)。教與學的另類可能:在家教育自主學習之個案研究。台北:五
南。
張益勤(2019)。國小到高中,自學申請書如何準備?資源怎麼找?第一個要問 自己的問題是什麼?。親子天下。取自: https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/5263
鈕文英(2019)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北:雙葉書廊。
馮朝霖(2001)。另類教育與全球思考。教育研究月刊,92,33-42
潘世尊(2008)。王財貴的兒童讀經教育理論之析評。弘光人文社會學報,9,55- 96。
鄭同僚(2019)。課堂筆記。政大:質性研究法
蔡昌雄、蔡淑玲、劉鎮嘉(2006)。死亡焦慮下的自我照顧-以安寧護理人員為 例。生死學研究,(3),133-164。doi:10.29844/JLDS.200601.0004
親子天下(2015)。2015「實驗教育大調查」結果出爐,超過五成家長評國民教育 不及格。取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/1484
親子天下(2018)。青少年憂鬱風暴來襲兩成國、高中生,曾認真想過要自殺。
取自https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5078313-/
賴玲玲、蔡至欣(2009)。在家自學者網路論壇資訊行為初探:以讀經論壇為例。 教育資料與圖書館學,46(3),403-436。
顏姿吟(2014)。醫師世家子女生涯抉擇歷程與代間傳遞之研究─以整合歷程系 統的觀點探討。國立高雄師範大學諮商心理與復健諮商研究所博士論文,高 雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x8288e
簡沛如(2018)。花蓮縣國中生在家教育之研究。國立東華大學教育行政與管理 學系碩士論文,花蓮縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q277r2

貳、英文文獻
Ansbacher, H. L. (1992). Alfred Adler, pioneer in prevention of mental disorders.
Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 48(1), 3-34.
Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGA.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating
narrative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080104
Bright, J. E. H., Pryor, R. G. L., Wilkenfeld, S., Earl, J. (2005). The role of social context
and serendipitous events in career decision making. International Journal for
Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5, 19-36.
Briggs, C. L. (2001). Interviewing, Power/Knowledge and Social Inequality. Retrieved
from https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n52.
Campbell, J. (1949/1997)。千面英雄(朱侃如譯)。台北:立緒
Cascio, W. (2007). Trends, Paradoxes, and Some Directions for Research in Career
Studies. In Gunz, H. & Peiperl, M(eds). Career Studies (pp.549-557). CA: Sage.
Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Prideaux, L. A. (2007). Predicting change over time in career
planning and career exploration for high school students. Journal of Adolescence,
30(3), 377-392.
Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices. In N. K.
Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.
651-679). Thousand Oaks, CA, : Sage Publications Ltd.
Cochran, L. R. (1990). Narrative as a paradigm for career research. In R. A. Young, &
W. A. Borgen (Eds.), Methodological approaches to the study of careers (pp. 71- 86). New York: Praeger.
Coakley, J. (2006) The Good Father: Parental Expectations and Youth Sports. Leisure
Studies, 25(2), 153–163.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2000) The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.
In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1-32.
Fouad, N. A. (2007). Work and Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and
Applications. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 543-564.
Freud, Sigmund. (1922). Group Psychology and The Analysis of Ego: University
of Michigan Library.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Germejs, V. & Verschueren, K. (2006). High school students’ career decision-making
process: A longitudinal study of one choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2),189-204.
Ginzberg, E. (1951). Occupational choice, an approach to a general theory. NewYork:
Columbia University Press.
Grygo, M. (2006). An examination of selected factors influencing the career decisions
of aboriginal university students. (Master Thesis). Retrieved from https://goo.gl/pWF3ZS
Gushue, G. V., Scanlan, K. R. L., Pantzer, K. M., & Clarke, C. P. (2006). The
relationship of career decision-making self-efficacy, vocational identity, and career exploration behavior in African American high school students. Journal of Career Development,33(1), 19-28.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women`s
Development. New York: Harvard University Press.
Hendry, P. M. (2010) Narrative as Inquiry, The Journal of Educational Research, 103(2),
72-80.
Homeschooling Advice and Activities from About.com。取自: http://homeschooling.about.com/
Holt, J. (1981). Teach Your Own: The John Holt Book of Homeschooling. New York: Da Capo Lifelong.
Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice:A theory of personality types and environmental. New York:Ginn.
Kelly (1955). The Psychology of Personal Construct. New York
Kelly, G. A. (1995). The psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality.
London: Routledge.
Kroger, J. (1989). Identity in Adolescence:The Balance Between Self and Other.
London and New York: Routledge.
Krumboltz, J. (1979). A social learning theory of career decision making. In A. M.
Mitchel., G. G. James, & J. D. Krumboltz (Eds.), Social learning and decision-making. (pp.19-49) Granston, RI: Corrole Press.
Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R. and Zilber, T. (1998) Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation. Vol. 47, Sage, Thousand Oaks. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985253
Lochner, L. (2008). Intergenerational Transmission. In S. N. Durlauf, &; L. E. Blume
(2nd eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (pp. 413-417). Palgrave Macmillan.
Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Solberg, V. S. H., Soresi, S.(2007).Career search self-efficacy,
family support, and career indecision with Italian youth. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 181-193.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 130(6), 829-830.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.). Handbook of
adolescent psychology, 159-187.New York: Wiley
McAdams, D. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist
Psychology, 19(2), 109-125.
Oliver, K. L. (1998). A Journey into Narrative Analysis: A Methodology for
Discovering Meanings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(2),244-259.
Okubo, Y., Yeh, C. J., Lin, P. Y., Fujita, K., Shea, J. M. Y. (2007). The career decision- making process of Chinese American youth. Journal of Counseling & Development,85(4),440-449.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. R.Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Phillips, S. D., Christopher-Sisk, E. K., &; Gravino, K. L. (2001). Making career
decisions in a relational context. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 193-214.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis.
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1),5-23.
Ray, Brian D. (2015). Research Facts on Homeschooling. National Home Education
Research Institute. Retrieved from:https://www.nheri.org/
Ray, Brian D. (2017). A Systematic Review of the Empirical Research on Selected
Aspects of Homeschooling as a School Choice. Journal of School Choice, 11(4),604-621.
Richards, H. M., & Schwartz, L. J. (2002). Ethics of qualitative research: are there
special issues for health services research? Family Practice, 19(2),135-139.
Roll, T., & Arthur, N. (2002). Beliefs in career counselling.
Available: https://contactpoint.ca/wp- content/uploads/2013/01/pdf-02-03.pdf
Savickas, M. (1997). Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life-Span, Life-
Space Theory. Career Development Quarterly, 45, 247-259.
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown
& R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and
research to work (pp. 42-70). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R.
W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research
to work (pp. 144-180). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement.
San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Super, D. E. (1984). Career and life development. In D. Brown, & L. Brooks (Eds.).
Career choice and development: applying contemporary theories to practice. San
Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Surrey, J. L. (1991). The “self-in-relation”: A theory of women’s development. In J. V.
Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, &; J. I. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s
growth in connection: Writing from the Stone Center (pp. 51-66). New York: Gilford.
Tiedeman, D. V., & O`Hara, R. P. (1963). Career development: Choice and
adjustment. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
Watkins, C. E. J. (1993). Psychodynamic career assessment: An Adlerian perspective.
Journal of Career Assessment, 1(4), 355-374.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
107152003
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152003
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 鄭同僚zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Cheng, Tung-Liaoen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周皓偉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou, Hao-Weien_US
dc.creator (作者) 周皓偉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chou, Hao-Weien_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Aug-2020 18:23:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Aug-2020 18:23:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Aug-2020 18:23:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107152003en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131246-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107152003zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文旨在了解影響自學生生涯抉擇的重要因素以及自學生的生涯抉擇歷程。本研究透過三位研究參與者,進行每人3-4小時的深度質性訪談,並以敘說研究中的「整體-內容」和「類別-內容」進行分析。
研究者綜合三位研究參與者的生命故事,分析出研究參與者自學經驗中影響生涯抉擇的重要因素,有四個層面:
一、環境層面
(一)社會變遷快速;(二)網際網路的發達;(三)實驗教育相關政策興起
二、學校層面
生命中的貴人協助與引領
三、家庭層面
家庭成員之間的互動氣氛
四、個人層面
(一)自我調整的學習能力;(二)自我照顧的復原力;(三)保持彈性與創造力
研究參與者在走過的自學生涯抉擇旅程可以分成三階段九個主題:
(一)自學之前:1.個體與環境不適應;2.自我掙扎;3.分離
(二)自學當下:4.展開冒險;5.危機;6.習得寶藏;7.回歸
(三)自學之後:8.全新的自己;9.堅持或調整原有的目標
最後,研究者對研究限制、未來研究、教育實務現場的工作者以及欲走上自學這條路的孩子與家長提出相關建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study is to understand factors and process of self-learning students’ experience on career decision-making. This study adopted in-depth interview as the major research method. Three participants were interviewed and each lasted 3-4 hours. The data were analyzed through “holistic-content” and “categorical-content” approaches from narrative research.
From three participants’ life story, the researchers attempts to the factors which affect participants’ career decision-making in their self-learning experience. Four important parts are presented as follows.
1. Environmental level
(a) rapid social changes;(b) the development of the Internet;(c) the rise of experimental education related policies.
2. School level
assistance and guidance of the benefactors in life.
3. Family level
the atmosphere and interaction among family members.
4. Personal level
(a) self-adjustinged learning ability;(b) self-healing ability;(c) flexibilityle and creativitye
The participants’ journey of decision-making in self-learning experience can be divided into three stages and nine themes.
1. Before self- learning: (a) the individual does not adapt to the environment;(b) self-struggles;(c) separation.
2. During self- learning: (d) embark on an adventure;(e) trials;(f) get treasure;(g) return.
3. After self- learning:(h) a whole new self;(i) stick to or adjust the original goal. Finally, the study gave suggestions to those who are interested in this field and children and parents who want to do self-learning. Research restriction of this study was also pointed out.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 4
第三節 重要名詞釋義 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 個人自學 7
第二節 生涯抉擇歷程 23
第三節 生涯抉擇的相關影響因素 35
第三章 研究設計與方法 47
第一節 研究取向 47
第二節 研究參與者 54
第三節 研究工具與研究實施程序 55
第四節 研究資料處理與分析 58
第五節 研究結果的可信賴程度 60
第六節 研究倫理之省思 62
第四章 研究結果 64
第一節 靜竹的生涯抉擇故事 64
第二節 小安的生涯抉擇故事 93
第三節 悠人的生涯抉擇故事 140
第五章 研究討論 178
第一節 影響個人生涯抉擇的重要因素 178
第二節 個人走過自學經驗的生涯抉擇歷程 193
第六章 研究結論與建議 200
第一節 研究結論 200
第二節 研究者的省思 205
第三節 研究限制與建議 207
參考文獻 212
附錄一 研究說明書 220
附錄二 訪談同意書 221
附錄三 訪談大綱 222
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4373181 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152003en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自學經驗zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生涯抉擇歷程zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 敘說研究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英雄之旅zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Self-learningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Career decision-making processen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Narrative researchen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hero`s Journeyen_US
dc.title (題名) 走一條不同的路:自學生的自學經驗與生涯抉擇之敘說研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Taking a Different Route:The Narrative Inquiry in Self-learning Experience and Career Decision-making of Individual Experimental Education Students.en_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文文獻
Yes123求職網(2017)。人生志願選填與職場溫拿魯蛇調查。取自:
https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/article.asp?id=20170718144909
丁凡譯(2016)。用「自主學習」來翻轉教育!沒有課表、沒有分數的
瑟谷學校(Daniel Greenberg著)。台北:樹橡林。
王勇智、鄧明宇譯(2017)。敘說分析(Riessman, C. K. 著)。台北:五南。
王玉珍、吳麗琴(2009)。大一生回顧升學生涯抉擇與生涯適應之脈絡相互影響
模式探究。中華輔導與諮商學報,25,39-79。
方慧琴(2002)。台北市實施在家自行教育之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育 研究所碩士論文,臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4h8u45
田秀蘭(1998)。男女大學生生涯阻礙因素之分析研究。教育心理學報,30(1), 133-148。
田秀蘭(2015)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北:學富文化。
包媖子(2013)。在家自行教育與學校教育學生學習適應、幸福感之比較研究。 國立新竹教育大學人資處教育心理與諮商碩士專班碩士論文,新竹市。 取 自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hqy4un
江玉娟、趙善如(2007)。原住民部落少年的生涯成熟與未來生涯抉擇-以屏東
縣少年為例。東吳社會工作學報,(16),79-122。
成虹飛(2005)。乘著歌聲的翅膀:「飛」越敘說與課程實踐。教育研究月刊,129,
5-13。
李明昌(2004)。在家教育法制化之研究。輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文,新 北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jy848b
李雅卿(2006)。自主學習的理念與實踐。品質月刊,42(10),54-57。
何粵東(2005)。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理研究,25,55-72。
吳芝儀(2000)。生涯輔導與諮商:理論與實務。嘉義:濤石。
吳清山(2011)。自學生的平等受教權。師友月刊,534,47-52。
吳武典、盧台華、王振德、陳龍安(1990)。國民教育階段身心障礙兒童安置狀 況調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,6,1-18。
吳武典(1994)。我國身心障礙兒童教育安置之檢討。師大學報,39,134-181。
林怡青(2001)。國三學生選擇入學學校之抉擇歷程與其影響因素。中華輔導學 報,11,71-123。
林純真(2018)。實驗教育三法鬆綁教育體制後,在家自學的趨勢。臺灣教育評
論月刊,7(1),96-102。
邱愉容(2008)。國小高年級學生父母期望知覺與自我調整學習之相關研究(未出 版之碩士論文)。東華大學,花蓮市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/74wc49
兒盟資料館(2018)。2018年兒童幸福感調查。取自: https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/67/1353
金樹人、林清山、田秀蘭(1989)。我國大專生生涯發展定向之研究。教育心理
學報,22,167-190
金樹人(2010)。 心理位移研究的趣與味:自性化過程的實踐。輔導季刊,47(2), 1-6。
金樹人(2011)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北:東華。
洪美鈴、郭豐榮(2017)。拒學現象之生態系統觀點。諮商與輔導,(380),31-37。
柯晏邾譯(2013)。流浪者之歌( Hermann Hesse著)。台北:遠流。
秦夢群(2015)。教育選擇權研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版。
唐光華(2016)。多元化的臺灣在家自學教育模式─實驗教育個案週課表比較分
析。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,5。
唐傳義、鄭曉芬(2019)。大學考招制度變革與高中教育之關聯。台灣教育(715),
63-68。
教育部統計處(2015)。中華民國教育統計民國104年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2016)。中華民國教育統計民國105年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2017)。中華民國教育統計民國106年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2018)。中華民國教育統計民國107年版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處(2019)。中華民國教育統計民國108年版。臺北市:教育部。
許玉芳(2008)。國小學童的教師期望、父母期望與自我效能、學業成就之相關
研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f28w23
許素梅(2003)。平常心看待在家教育。師友月刊,429,21-22。
黃光國(2009)。本土心理學的知識論目標。黃光國編,儒家關係主義-哲學反
思、理論建構與實徵研究(2-24頁)。台北:心理。
黃淑惠(2005)。國小高年級學童知覺父親教養方式、教育期望與親子關係之模
式探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/35q568
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南出版社。
陳勇祥、張昇鵬(2015)。二位藝術才能資賦優異成人回顧其生涯歷程與生涯抉
擇之思考及論述。資優教育季刊,(135),9-16。
陳煒婷(2015)。偏遠地區原住民青少年生涯資本與生涯抉擇之相關性研究。東
海大學社會工作學系碩士論文,台中市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8vdt3e
陳慧潔(2015)。有了夢想,然後呢?。台北:格子外面。
陳怡光、張瀞文(2017)。選擇自學,必備4要點。親子天下雜誌,29,132-133。
陳德蓉(2007)。在家教育課程與教學之研究-以中南部某家庭為例。國立嘉義大 學國民教育研究所碩士論文,嘉義市。 取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ercea5
陳淑英(2006)。論父母在家教育權-教育行政的鬆綁與再規範。學校行政,42, 79-89。
莊明貞(2010)。敘事探究:課程與教學的應用。台北:心理。
張曉佩、卓秀足譯(2018)。理解敘說探究(Jeong-Hee Kim著)。台北:心理。
張碧如(2006)。教與學的另類可能:在家教育自主學習之個案研究。台北:五
南。
張益勤(2019)。國小到高中,自學申請書如何準備?資源怎麼找?第一個要問 自己的問題是什麼?。親子天下。取自: https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/5263
鈕文英(2019)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北:雙葉書廊。
馮朝霖(2001)。另類教育與全球思考。教育研究月刊,92,33-42
潘世尊(2008)。王財貴的兒童讀經教育理論之析評。弘光人文社會學報,9,55- 96。
鄭同僚(2019)。課堂筆記。政大:質性研究法
蔡昌雄、蔡淑玲、劉鎮嘉(2006)。死亡焦慮下的自我照顧-以安寧護理人員為 例。生死學研究,(3),133-164。doi:10.29844/JLDS.200601.0004
親子天下(2015)。2015「實驗教育大調查」結果出爐,超過五成家長評國民教育 不及格。取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/1484
親子天下(2018)。青少年憂鬱風暴來襲兩成國、高中生,曾認真想過要自殺。
取自https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5078313-/
賴玲玲、蔡至欣(2009)。在家自學者網路論壇資訊行為初探:以讀經論壇為例。 教育資料與圖書館學,46(3),403-436。
顏姿吟(2014)。醫師世家子女生涯抉擇歷程與代間傳遞之研究─以整合歷程系 統的觀點探討。國立高雄師範大學諮商心理與復健諮商研究所博士論文,高 雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x8288e
簡沛如(2018)。花蓮縣國中生在家教育之研究。國立東華大學教育行政與管理 學系碩士論文,花蓮縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q277r2

貳、英文文獻
Ansbacher, H. L. (1992). Alfred Adler, pioneer in prevention of mental disorders.
Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 48(1), 3-34.
Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGA.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating
narrative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080104
Bright, J. E. H., Pryor, R. G. L., Wilkenfeld, S., Earl, J. (2005). The role of social context
and serendipitous events in career decision making. International Journal for
Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5, 19-36.
Briggs, C. L. (2001). Interviewing, Power/Knowledge and Social Inequality. Retrieved
from https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n52.
Campbell, J. (1949/1997)。千面英雄(朱侃如譯)。台北:立緒
Cascio, W. (2007). Trends, Paradoxes, and Some Directions for Research in Career
Studies. In Gunz, H. & Peiperl, M(eds). Career Studies (pp.549-557). CA: Sage.
Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Prideaux, L. A. (2007). Predicting change over time in career
planning and career exploration for high school students. Journal of Adolescence,
30(3), 377-392.
Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices. In N. K.
Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.
651-679). Thousand Oaks, CA, : Sage Publications Ltd.
Cochran, L. R. (1990). Narrative as a paradigm for career research. In R. A. Young, &
W. A. Borgen (Eds.), Methodological approaches to the study of careers (pp. 71- 86). New York: Praeger.
Coakley, J. (2006) The Good Father: Parental Expectations and Youth Sports. Leisure
Studies, 25(2), 153–163.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2000) The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.
In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1-32.
Fouad, N. A. (2007). Work and Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and
Applications. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 543-564.
Freud, Sigmund. (1922). Group Psychology and The Analysis of Ego: University
of Michigan Library.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Germejs, V. & Verschueren, K. (2006). High school students’ career decision-making
process: A longitudinal study of one choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2),189-204.
Ginzberg, E. (1951). Occupational choice, an approach to a general theory. NewYork:
Columbia University Press.
Grygo, M. (2006). An examination of selected factors influencing the career decisions
of aboriginal university students. (Master Thesis). Retrieved from https://goo.gl/pWF3ZS
Gushue, G. V., Scanlan, K. R. L., Pantzer, K. M., & Clarke, C. P. (2006). The
relationship of career decision-making self-efficacy, vocational identity, and career exploration behavior in African American high school students. Journal of Career Development,33(1), 19-28.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women`s
Development. New York: Harvard University Press.
Hendry, P. M. (2010) Narrative as Inquiry, The Journal of Educational Research, 103(2),
72-80.
Homeschooling Advice and Activities from About.com。取自: http://homeschooling.about.com/
Holt, J. (1981). Teach Your Own: The John Holt Book of Homeschooling. New York: Da Capo Lifelong.
Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice:A theory of personality types and environmental. New York:Ginn.
Kelly (1955). The Psychology of Personal Construct. New York
Kelly, G. A. (1995). The psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality.
London: Routledge.
Kroger, J. (1989). Identity in Adolescence:The Balance Between Self and Other.
London and New York: Routledge.
Krumboltz, J. (1979). A social learning theory of career decision making. In A. M.
Mitchel., G. G. James, & J. D. Krumboltz (Eds.), Social learning and decision-making. (pp.19-49) Granston, RI: Corrole Press.
Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R. and Zilber, T. (1998) Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation. Vol. 47, Sage, Thousand Oaks. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985253
Lochner, L. (2008). Intergenerational Transmission. In S. N. Durlauf, &; L. E. Blume
(2nd eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (pp. 413-417). Palgrave Macmillan.
Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Solberg, V. S. H., Soresi, S.(2007).Career search self-efficacy,
family support, and career indecision with Italian youth. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 181-193.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 130(6), 829-830.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.). Handbook of
adolescent psychology, 159-187.New York: Wiley
McAdams, D. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist
Psychology, 19(2), 109-125.
Oliver, K. L. (1998). A Journey into Narrative Analysis: A Methodology for
Discovering Meanings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(2),244-259.
Okubo, Y., Yeh, C. J., Lin, P. Y., Fujita, K., Shea, J. M. Y. (2007). The career decision- making process of Chinese American youth. Journal of Counseling & Development,85(4),440-449.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. R.Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Phillips, S. D., Christopher-Sisk, E. K., &; Gravino, K. L. (2001). Making career
decisions in a relational context. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 193-214.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis.
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1),5-23.
Ray, Brian D. (2015). Research Facts on Homeschooling. National Home Education
Research Institute. Retrieved from:https://www.nheri.org/
Ray, Brian D. (2017). A Systematic Review of the Empirical Research on Selected
Aspects of Homeschooling as a School Choice. Journal of School Choice, 11(4),604-621.
Richards, H. M., & Schwartz, L. J. (2002). Ethics of qualitative research: are there
special issues for health services research? Family Practice, 19(2),135-139.
Roll, T., & Arthur, N. (2002). Beliefs in career counselling.
Available: https://contactpoint.ca/wp- content/uploads/2013/01/pdf-02-03.pdf
Savickas, M. (1997). Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life-Span, Life-
Space Theory. Career Development Quarterly, 45, 247-259.
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown
& R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and
research to work (pp. 42-70). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R.
W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research
to work (pp. 144-180). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement.
San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Super, D. E. (1984). Career and life development. In D. Brown, & L. Brooks (Eds.).
Career choice and development: applying contemporary theories to practice. San
Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Surrey, J. L. (1991). The “self-in-relation”: A theory of women’s development. In J. V.
Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, &; J. I. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s
growth in connection: Writing from the Stone Center (pp. 51-66). New York: Gilford.
Tiedeman, D. V., & O`Hara, R. P. (1963). Career development: Choice and
adjustment. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
Watkins, C. E. J. (1993). Psychodynamic career assessment: An Adlerian perspective.
Journal of Career Assessment, 1(4), 355-374.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001047en_US