1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 學習科技研究之文獻計量分析
Bibliometric Analysis on Learning Technology Studies
作者 王泓琦
Wang, Hong-Qi
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng-Ta
王泓琦
Wang,Hong-Qi
關鍵詞 學習科技
文獻計量分析
Learning Technology
Bibliometric Analysis
VOSviewer
日期 2020
上傳時間 3-Aug-2020 18:24:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 近年來國內外學習科技蓬勃發展，促成教師教學與學生學習模式的改變，有了學習科技的應用，讓學生能夠不受時間、空間的限制進行學習，即使是在教室中的教學與學習，有了與學習科技相關軟硬體設備的輔助，能夠增添教學的樣貌。
本研究使用Web of Science資料庫進行文獻查找與蒐集，除了應用WOS中的統計資料外，也將WOS資料庫中的書目資料，匯入VOSviewer中，進行學習科技研究關鍵字之數量分析、共字網絡分析、共被引網絡分析、作者科研合作網絡分析、科研合作作者國家/地區分布之網絡分析，另外也將WOS中的書目資料匯入CORPRO庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具，以進行各年代區間學習科技研究關鍵字之顯著性分析。
本研究結果發現學習科技研究具有跨領域特性，而近二十年學習科技研究蓬勃發展且越趨多元，可以依序分為2000年至2004年的學習科技研究奠定時期、2005年至2009年學習科技研究科技發展時期、2010年至2014年學習科技研究整合研究時期、2015年至2019年學習科技研究多元發展時期，而學習科技研究之層面可以分為技術層面、教學者層面、使用者/學習者層面、研究者層面共四層面，此外，本研究也發現學習科技研究作者合作之國家/地區分布多具有地緣性的連結。
本研究也建議後續的研究者可以聚焦於近十年學習科技研究，並將年代區間的設定縮短，另外可以特別關注2020年學習科技的發展狀況，並也能夠以臺灣之學習科技研究發展趨勢進行分析與討論。
Recently, learning technology at home and abroad have developed vigorously, which has led to changes in teacher teaching and student learning models. With the application of learning technology, students can further study without the constraints of time and space. Even for teaching and learning in the classroom, as long as it is equipped with the assistance of learning technology related hardware and software equipment, it can increase the appearance of teaching.
Web of Science database is used in this study to search and collect bibliographic data. In addition to applying the statistical data in WOS, the bibliographic data in the WOS database is further imported into VOSviewer for quantitative analysis, co-keyword network analysis, co-citation network analysis, co-authorship network analysis, co-author’s country/region distribution network analysis of related keywords of "Learning Technology Study". On top of that, this study also imported the bibliographic data in WOS into CORPRO, so as to carry out the significance analysis of the keywords of learning technology study in different periods.
It can be inferred from the results that learning technology study has cross-disciplinary characteristics. Meanwhile, in the past two decades, the research and development of learning technology have developed in depth and become more and more diverse. Such a development process can be divided into the lay period of learning technology study from 2000 to 2004, the technology development period of learning technology study from 2005 to 2009, the integration research period of learning technology study from 2010 to 2014, and the period of multiple development of learning technology study from 2015 to 2019. As for the aspects of learning technology studies, they can be divided into four aspects: technical level, teaching level, user/learner level, and researcher level. What`s more, this study also found that the geographical distribution of the co-authorship of learning technology study is often geographically linked.
In response to the research results, this study suggests that subsequent researchers can devote themselves to the study of learning technology in the past decade, and shorten the setting of the chronology. In addition, future research can pay special attention to the development of learning technology in 2020, and can also conduct in-depth analysis and discussion based on the development trend of learning technology studies in Taiwan.
參考文獻 壹、中文文獻
王梅玲(2005)。大學研究評鑑與引文分析應用。圖書館學與資訊科學，31(1)，5-13。
何光國(1992)。文獻計量學論著樣本之計量分析。圖書館學與資訊科學，18，48-82。
何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。臺北市:三民書局。
宋曜廷、張國恩、于文正(2006)。行動載具在博物館學習的應用：促進「人一機一境」互動的設計。博物館學季刊，20(1)，17-34。
李佳蓉(2015)。提升教學成效-影片融入教學之探討與策略。科技與人力教育季刊，1(4)，1-13。
郭文平(2015)。字彙實踐及媒介再現：語料庫分析方法在總體經濟新聞文本分析運用研究。新聞學研究，125，95-142。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要 總綱。取自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/948/67020.pdf
教育部(2017)。中小學資訊教育 總藍圖。取自
http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/userfiles/guideline(9006).pdf
教育部(2019)。迎接科技輔助自主學習時代的到來 公私協力 共構共享 推動數位學習師資培育。取自https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=F17260531EEDBEB7
教育部(2019)。國民小學及國民中學設施設備基準。取自
https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000314
教育部(2019)。教育部108年至110年美感與設計課程創新計畫總計畫團隊。取自 https://www.aade.org.tw/
教育部(2019)。普通型高級中等學校設備基準。取自https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001928
教育部(2020)。居家防疫、學習持續 教育部鼓勵親師生善用數位平臺資源讓學習不中斷。取自 https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=1F2B31197A56447F
莊道明(2012)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典- 資訊素養。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679154/?index=2
陳光華、江玉婷、莊雅蓁、許雅淑（1998）。引文分析研究發展現況。書府，18/19，15-47。
陳光華(2006)。書目計量學 Lecture06 - 齊普夫經驗法則。取自
https://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/~khchen/course/bm/bm2006/bm200606.pdf
陳良駒、張正宏、陳日鑫(2010)。以特徵詞共現特性探討知識管理研究議題相關性-使用共詞與關聯法則分析。資訊管理學報，17(4)，31-60。
陳金宏、林東興、林盟傑(2016)。數位多媒體融入體育課程對學習態度與自我效能之影響-以彰泰國中游泳教學為例。臺中科大體育學刊，12，87-101。
陳惠美(2000)。教育大辭書- 合作學習。取自 https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/title=%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92
彭慰(1995)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典- 書目計量法。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681681/?index
黃建翔(2017)。淺談 IRS 即時反饋系統運用至大學課程教學之策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(10)，81-87。
楊麗櫻、陳棟樑、陳俐文(2019)。國小學童家長運用即時通訊軟體 LINE 進行親師溝通行為意圖與滿意度之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢，3(1)，44-57。
經濟部工業局(2010)。數位學習與典藏產業推動計畫 產業輔導與升級分項計畫國內外數位學習產業現狀與產值調查分析報告。取自 http://www.epark.org.tw/images/20110105155118image_6.pdf
經濟部工業局(2019)。108 數位內容產業年鑑。取自 https://drive.google.com/file/d/18aZtYcfpnqCUp6JplcymdHv5ooegUZ45/view
趙蓉英、許麗敏(2010)。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿的知識圖譜探析。中國圖書館學報，36，60-68。
蔡永橙、黃國倫、邱志義(2007)。數位典藏技術導論。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
蔡明月(1997)。書目計量學、科學計量學與資訊計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，34(3)，268-284。
蔡明月(2000)。文獻老化及其研究。教育資料與圖書館學，38(1)，47-64。
蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。
蔡明月、古育詩(2005)。光觸媒文獻之書目計量學研究。教育資料與圖書館學，43，153-172。
賴玲玲、林姝吟(2016)。數位學習平台可用性研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，33(4)，35-49。
顏春煌(2015)。數位學習：觀念、方法、實務、設計與實作（第三版）。臺北市: 碁峰。
闕河嘉、陳光華(2016)。庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具之開發與應用。數位人文:在過去、現在和未來之間，285-313。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。

貳、英文文獻
American Library Association (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Chicago: ALA.
Bartsch, S. (2004). Structural and functional properties of collocations in English: A corpus study of lexical and pragmatic constraints on lexical co-occurrence. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Bernal, J. D. (1958). The transmission of scientific information: a user`s analysis. Proceedings of the international conference on scientific information, 1, 77-95.
Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
Callaghan, V., Shen, L., Gardner, M., Shen, R., & Wang, M. (2010). A mixed reality approach to hybrid learning in mixed culture environments. In Handbook of research on hybrid learning models: Advanced tools, technologies, and
applications (pp. 260-283). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Chang, S. C., Hsu, T. C., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers & Education, 146, 103758.
Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Cole, F. J. & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: a statistical analysis of scientific literature. Science Progress, 11, 578-96.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
de Barba, P. G., Malekian, D., Oliveira, E. A., Bailey, J., Ryan, T., & Kennedy, G. (2020). The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 146, 103772.
Eng, C. M., Tomasic, A. S., & Thiessen, E. D. (2019). Contingent responsivity in E-books modeled from quality adult-child interactions: Effects on children’s
learning and attention. Developmental Psychology, 56, 285-297.
Ficarra, L. R., & Chapin, D. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing universal design for learning (UDL) as learning technology in non-formal education. In Handbook of research on transformative digital content and learning technologies (pp. 81-102). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Fuster-Guillo, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Azorin-Lopez, J., Rico-Soliveres, M. L., & Restrepo-Calle, F. (2019). Evaluating Impact on Motivation and Academic Performance of a Game-Based Learning Experience Using Kahoot. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2843.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122 (3159), 103-111.
Garfield, E. (1964). "Science Citation Index"-A New Dimension in Indexing. Science, 144 (3619), 649-654.
Gosnell, C. F. (1943). The rate of obsolescence in college library book collections (Doctoral dissertation). New York University, New York.
Gross, P. L., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
Hoon, L. N., & Shaharuddin, S. S. (2019). Learning Effectiveness of 3D Hologram Animation on Primary School Learners. Journal of Visual Art and Design, 11(2),
93-104.
Huang, W. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2009). An integrated evaluation approach for e-learning systems in career and technical education. In Handbook of research on e-learning applications for career and technical education: technologies for vocational training (pp. 396-407). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Hulme, E. W. (1923). Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization: two lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge in May 1922.
Nature, 112, 585-586.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16, 317-323.
Marshakova, I. V. (1973). Document coupling system based on references taken from Science Citation Index. Russia, Nauchno-Teknicheskaya Informatsiya, Ser, 2.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
McLoughlin, C. (2002). Computer supported teamwork: An integrative approach to evaluating cooperative learning in an online environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 227-254.
Monarch, I. A. (2000). Information science and information systems: converging or diverging? Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS。
Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman(2020).VOSviewer Manual. Retrieved from
file:///C:/Users/Administrator/Downloads/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.15.pdf
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ozhan, S. C., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006-2031.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Radovic, S., Radojicic, M., Veljkovic, K., & Maric, M. (2020). Examining the effects of Geogebra applets on mathematics learning using interactive mathematics
textbook. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 32-49.
Roblyer, M., & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating Technology Into Teaching. New Jersey: Merrill.
Sahin, M. (2019). Classroom Response Systems as a Formative Assessment Tool: Investigation into Students’ Perceived Usefulness and Behavioural Intention. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 693-705.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook.Contemporary Sociology, 22(1), 128.
Sengupta, I. (1986). Three new parameters in bibliometric research and their application to rerank periodicals in the field of biochemistry. Scientometrics, 10(5-6), 235-242.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Surry, D. W. (2008). Innovations in learning technology. In Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration (pp. 413-417). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Tang, Cheng, Chen, & , Hsian. (2016).A Study of Knowledge Integration in Digital Humanities Based on Bibliographic Analysis.Retrieved from http://140.112.114.25/TADH/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/20161125ppt.pptx
Tsay, C. H. H. , Kofinas, A. K., Trivedi, S. K., & Yang, Y. (2019). Overcoming the novelty effect in online gamified learning systems: An empirical evaluation of student engagement and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes (E. Rice, Ed. & Trans.).
Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2010). Generational learners & e-learning technologies. In Handbook of research on practices and outcomes in e-learning: issues and trends (pp. 76-92). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Zipf, G. K. (1965). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. United Kingdom: Routledge.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
107152009
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152009
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng-Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王泓琦zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang,Hong-Qien_US
dc.creator (作者) 王泓琦zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Hong-Qien_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Aug-2020 18:24:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Aug-2020 18:24:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Aug-2020 18:24:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107152009en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131250-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107152009zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來國內外學習科技蓬勃發展，促成教師教學與學生學習模式的改變，有了學習科技的應用，讓學生能夠不受時間、空間的限制進行學習，即使是在教室中的教學與學習，有了與學習科技相關軟硬體設備的輔助，能夠增添教學的樣貌。
本研究使用Web of Science資料庫進行文獻查找與蒐集，除了應用WOS中的統計資料外，也將WOS資料庫中的書目資料，匯入VOSviewer中，進行學習科技研究關鍵字之數量分析、共字網絡分析、共被引網絡分析、作者科研合作網絡分析、科研合作作者國家/地區分布之網絡分析，另外也將WOS中的書目資料匯入CORPRO庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具，以進行各年代區間學習科技研究關鍵字之顯著性分析。
本研究結果發現學習科技研究具有跨領域特性，而近二十年學習科技研究蓬勃發展且越趨多元，可以依序分為2000年至2004年的學習科技研究奠定時期、2005年至2009年學習科技研究科技發展時期、2010年至2014年學習科技研究整合研究時期、2015年至2019年學習科技研究多元發展時期，而學習科技研究之層面可以分為技術層面、教學者層面、使用者/學習者層面、研究者層面共四層面，此外，本研究也發現學習科技研究作者合作之國家/地區分布多具有地緣性的連結。
本研究也建議後續的研究者可以聚焦於近十年學習科技研究，並將年代區間的設定縮短，另外可以特別關注2020年學習科技的發展狀況，並也能夠以臺灣之學習科技研究發展趨勢進行分析與討論。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Recently, learning technology at home and abroad have developed vigorously, which has led to changes in teacher teaching and student learning models. With the application of learning technology, students can further study without the constraints of time and space. Even for teaching and learning in the classroom, as long as it is equipped with the assistance of learning technology related hardware and software equipment, it can increase the appearance of teaching.
Web of Science database is used in this study to search and collect bibliographic data. In addition to applying the statistical data in WOS, the bibliographic data in the WOS database is further imported into VOSviewer for quantitative analysis, co-keyword network analysis, co-citation network analysis, co-authorship network analysis, co-author’s country/region distribution network analysis of related keywords of "Learning Technology Study". On top of that, this study also imported the bibliographic data in WOS into CORPRO, so as to carry out the significance analysis of the keywords of learning technology study in different periods.
It can be inferred from the results that learning technology study has cross-disciplinary characteristics. Meanwhile, in the past two decades, the research and development of learning technology have developed in depth and become more and more diverse. Such a development process can be divided into the lay period of learning technology study from 2000 to 2004, the technology development period of learning technology study from 2005 to 2009, the integration research period of learning technology study from 2010 to 2014, and the period of multiple development of learning technology study from 2015 to 2019. As for the aspects of learning technology studies, they can be divided into four aspects: technical level, teaching level, user/learner level, and researcher level. What`s more, this study also found that the geographical distribution of the co-authorship of learning technology study is often geographically linked.
In response to the research results, this study suggests that subsequent researchers can devote themselves to the study of learning technology in the past decade, and shorten the setting of the chronology. In addition, future research can pay special attention to the development of learning technology in 2020, and can also conduct in-depth analysis and discussion based on the development trend of learning technology studies in Taiwan.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄 I
表次 III
圖次 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究範圍與限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 學習科技之內涵 9
第二節 文獻計量學之意涵 28
第三章 研究設計與實施 37
第一節 研究流程 37
第二節 研究內容 38
第三節 研究方法 39
第四節 研究工具 40
第五節 研究實施程序 48
第四章 研究結果與分析 52
第一節 學習科技研究之文獻數量統計與領域分析 52
第二節 學習科技研究之關鍵字分析 60
第三節 學習科技研究之網絡分析 88
第五章 研究結論與建議 101
第一節 研究結論 101
第二節 研究建議 107
參考文獻 109
壹、中文文獻 109
貳、英文文獻 112		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 3636661 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152009en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習科技zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文獻計量分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Learning Technologyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bibliometric Analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) VOSvieweren_US
dc.title (題名) 學習科技研究之文獻計量分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Bibliometric Analysis on Learning Technology Studiesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文文獻
王梅玲(2005)。大學研究評鑑與引文分析應用。圖書館學與資訊科學，31(1)，5-13。
何光國(1992)。文獻計量學論著樣本之計量分析。圖書館學與資訊科學，18，48-82。
何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。臺北市:三民書局。
宋曜廷、張國恩、于文正(2006)。行動載具在博物館學習的應用：促進「人一機一境」互動的設計。博物館學季刊，20(1)，17-34。
李佳蓉(2015)。提升教學成效-影片融入教學之探討與策略。科技與人力教育季刊，1(4)，1-13。
郭文平(2015)。字彙實踐及媒介再現：語料庫分析方法在總體經濟新聞文本分析運用研究。新聞學研究，125，95-142。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要 總綱。取自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/948/67020.pdf
教育部(2017)。中小學資訊教育 總藍圖。取自
http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/userfiles/guideline(9006).pdf
教育部(2019)。迎接科技輔助自主學習時代的到來 公私協力 共構共享 推動數位學習師資培育。取自https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=F17260531EEDBEB7
教育部(2019)。國民小學及國民中學設施設備基準。取自
https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000314
教育部(2019)。教育部108年至110年美感與設計課程創新計畫總計畫團隊。取自 https://www.aade.org.tw/
教育部(2019)。普通型高級中等學校設備基準。取自https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001928
教育部(2020)。居家防疫、學習持續 教育部鼓勵親師生善用數位平臺資源讓學習不中斷。取自 https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=1F2B31197A56447F
莊道明(2012)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典- 資訊素養。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679154/?index=2
陳光華、江玉婷、莊雅蓁、許雅淑（1998）。引文分析研究發展現況。書府，18/19，15-47。
陳光華(2006)。書目計量學 Lecture06 - 齊普夫經驗法則。取自
https://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/~khchen/course/bm/bm2006/bm200606.pdf
陳良駒、張正宏、陳日鑫(2010)。以特徵詞共現特性探討知識管理研究議題相關性-使用共詞與關聯法則分析。資訊管理學報，17(4)，31-60。
陳金宏、林東興、林盟傑(2016)。數位多媒體融入體育課程對學習態度與自我效能之影響-以彰泰國中游泳教學為例。臺中科大體育學刊，12，87-101。
陳惠美(2000)。教育大辭書- 合作學習。取自 https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/title=%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92
彭慰(1995)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典- 書目計量法。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681681/?index
黃建翔(2017)。淺談 IRS 即時反饋系統運用至大學課程教學之策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(10)，81-87。
楊麗櫻、陳棟樑、陳俐文(2019)。國小學童家長運用即時通訊軟體 LINE 進行親師溝通行為意圖與滿意度之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢，3(1)，44-57。
經濟部工業局(2010)。數位學習與典藏產業推動計畫 產業輔導與升級分項計畫國內外數位學習產業現狀與產值調查分析報告。取自 http://www.epark.org.tw/images/20110105155118image_6.pdf
經濟部工業局(2019)。108 數位內容產業年鑑。取自 https://drive.google.com/file/d/18aZtYcfpnqCUp6JplcymdHv5ooegUZ45/view
趙蓉英、許麗敏(2010)。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿的知識圖譜探析。中國圖書館學報，36，60-68。
蔡永橙、黃國倫、邱志義(2007)。數位典藏技術導論。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
蔡明月(1997)。書目計量學、科學計量學與資訊計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，34(3)，268-284。
蔡明月(2000)。文獻老化及其研究。教育資料與圖書館學，38(1)，47-64。
蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。
蔡明月、古育詩(2005)。光觸媒文獻之書目計量學研究。教育資料與圖書館學，43，153-172。
賴玲玲、林姝吟(2016)。數位學習平台可用性研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，33(4)，35-49。
顏春煌(2015)。數位學習：觀念、方法、實務、設計與實作（第三版）。臺北市: 碁峰。
闕河嘉、陳光華(2016)。庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具之開發與應用。數位人文:在過去、現在和未來之間，285-313。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。

貳、英文文獻
American Library Association (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Chicago: ALA.
Bartsch, S. (2004). Structural and functional properties of collocations in English: A corpus study of lexical and pragmatic constraints on lexical co-occurrence. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Bernal, J. D. (1958). The transmission of scientific information: a user`s analysis. Proceedings of the international conference on scientific information, 1, 77-95.
Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
Callaghan, V., Shen, L., Gardner, M., Shen, R., & Wang, M. (2010). A mixed reality approach to hybrid learning in mixed culture environments. In Handbook of research on hybrid learning models: Advanced tools, technologies, and
applications (pp. 260-283). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Chang, S. C., Hsu, T. C., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers & Education, 146, 103758.
Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Cole, F. J. & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: a statistical analysis of scientific literature. Science Progress, 11, 578-96.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
de Barba, P. G., Malekian, D., Oliveira, E. A., Bailey, J., Ryan, T., & Kennedy, G. (2020). The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 146, 103772.
Eng, C. M., Tomasic, A. S., & Thiessen, E. D. (2019). Contingent responsivity in E-books modeled from quality adult-child interactions: Effects on children’s
learning and attention. Developmental Psychology, 56, 285-297.
Ficarra, L. R., & Chapin, D. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing universal design for learning (UDL) as learning technology in non-formal education. In Handbook of research on transformative digital content and learning technologies (pp. 81-102). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Fuster-Guillo, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Azorin-Lopez, J., Rico-Soliveres, M. L., & Restrepo-Calle, F. (2019). Evaluating Impact on Motivation and Academic Performance of a Game-Based Learning Experience Using Kahoot. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2843.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122 (3159), 103-111.
Garfield, E. (1964). "Science Citation Index"-A New Dimension in Indexing. Science, 144 (3619), 649-654.
Gosnell, C. F. (1943). The rate of obsolescence in college library book collections (Doctoral dissertation). New York University, New York.
Gross, P. L., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
Hoon, L. N., & Shaharuddin, S. S. (2019). Learning Effectiveness of 3D Hologram Animation on Primary School Learners. Journal of Visual Art and Design, 11(2),
93-104.
Huang, W. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2009). An integrated evaluation approach for e-learning systems in career and technical education. In Handbook of research on e-learning applications for career and technical education: technologies for vocational training (pp. 396-407). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Hulme, E. W. (1923). Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization: two lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge in May 1922.
Nature, 112, 585-586.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16, 317-323.
Marshakova, I. V. (1973). Document coupling system based on references taken from Science Citation Index. Russia, Nauchno-Teknicheskaya Informatsiya, Ser, 2.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
McLoughlin, C. (2002). Computer supported teamwork: An integrative approach to evaluating cooperative learning in an online environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 227-254.
Monarch, I. A. (2000). Information science and information systems: converging or diverging? Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS。
Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman(2020).VOSviewer Manual. Retrieved from
file:///C:/Users/Administrator/Downloads/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.15.pdf
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ozhan, S. C., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006-2031.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Radovic, S., Radojicic, M., Veljkovic, K., & Maric, M. (2020). Examining the effects of Geogebra applets on mathematics learning using interactive mathematics
textbook. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 32-49.
Roblyer, M., & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating Technology Into Teaching. New Jersey: Merrill.
Sahin, M. (2019). Classroom Response Systems as a Formative Assessment Tool: Investigation into Students’ Perceived Usefulness and Behavioural Intention. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 693-705.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook.Contemporary Sociology, 22(1), 128.
Sengupta, I. (1986). Three new parameters in bibliometric research and their application to rerank periodicals in the field of biochemistry. Scientometrics, 10(5-6), 235-242.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Surry, D. W. (2008). Innovations in learning technology. In Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration (pp. 413-417). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Tang, Cheng, Chen, & , Hsian. (2016).A Study of Knowledge Integration in Digital Humanities Based on Bibliographic Analysis.Retrieved from http://140.112.114.25/TADH/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/20161125ppt.pptx
Tsay, C. H. H. , Kofinas, A. K., Trivedi, S. K., & Yang, Y. (2019). Overcoming the novelty effect in online gamified learning systems: An empirical evaluation of student engagement and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes (E. Rice, Ed. & Trans.).
Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2010). Generational learners & e-learning technologies. In Handbook of research on practices and outcomes in e-learning: issues and trends (pp. 76-92). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Zipf, G. K. (1965). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. United Kingdom: Routledge.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000850en_US