1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 商學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 台灣公部門與私部門如何實踐永續發展目標
How Taiwan’s Public and Private Sectors Implement Sustainable Development Goals
作者 游宜珍
Yu, Yi-Chen
貢獻者 林月雲
Lin, Yeh-Yun
游宜珍
Yu, Yi-Chen
關鍵詞 永續發展目標SDGs
國際援助
企業社會責任
制度理論
日期 2020
上傳時間 3-八月-2020 18:42:02 (UTC+8)
摘要 聯合國在2015年通過《2030年永續發展議程》，包含17項「永續發展目標」(Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs)，以「沒有人是局外人」(No One Leave Behind)為精神，致力在2030年前，結合政府、企業、民間機構等力量，終結貧窮、保護地球，達到人類擁有和平與繁榮的生活藍圖(UN，2015)。在第17項目標裡的子目標，提及財務融資方面，已開發國家可充分藉由政府開發協助（Official development assistance，ODA）計畫，私部門則透過外國直接投資（Foreign direct investments ，FDI）的方式進行努力。近一步討論各方利害關係人如何參與其中，一起達到這個願景，是全球迫切的下一步行動。

本研究聚焦於台灣的公部門財團法人國際合作發展基金會（簡稱：國合會）（ICDF, International Cooperation and Development Fund）與私部門國泰金融控股股份有限公司（簡稱：國泰金控）（Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.），以公開資料與半結構式的訪談，了解雙方的永續歷史脈絡，透過制度理論與路徑依賴為分析工具，了解兩者實踐永續發展目標SDGs的動機、實踐方法、與對組織的影響與意義為何。

綜合發現，組織內部對永續的正面態度促使兩者積極參與這次永續發展目標SDGs倡議，實踐過程中，在公司高層的政策會議中，永續發展目標SDGs作為討論組織未來發展的參考框架，讓永續發展目標SDGs融入組織的政策制定脈絡裡。最後，從兩個組織的實踐過程中，本研究發現永續發展目標SDGs成為一個良好的溝通工具，能夠降低個體間對永續認知的落差與組織溝通的障礙，促進組織對內與對外的永續發展討論。
“Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was adopted at the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in New York in September 2015. UN pledge that no one will be left behind and commit to dedicating to ending poverty, protecting the planet, and accelerating peace and prosperity before 2030. Governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals will contribute to achieving these goals (UN, 2015). In Goal 17, referring to finance target, developed countries can implement fully their official development assistance (ODA) commitments, and the private sector through foreign direct investment (FDI). How stakeholders engage in this vision is a crucial next step in the world.

This research focuses on Taiwan’s public sector, International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF) and the private sector Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.. The information accessed from secondary data and semi-structured interviews to understand the sustainable history of both parties and analyzed the motives, methods, and impact of implementation SDGs with institutional theory and path dependence.

To summarize the analysis and discussion of this study, the internal positive attitude is a significant factor to induce organization to adopt SDGs implementation. In the process of practice, SDGs are used as the reference framework to discuss the future strategy in the company`s top executives meeting. Finally, this study found that the SDGs have become a good communication tool, which can reduce the gap between individuals` perceptions of sustainability and organizational communication barriers, and promote organizational internal and external discussions on sustainability.
參考文獻 中文文獻：
1. 台灣B lab官網http://blab.tw/
2. 林建煌（2019）。管理學概論（五版）。華泰文化事業公司。
3. 黃良志，黃家齊，溫金豐，廖文志&韓志翔（2017）。人力資源管理理論與實務（四版）。華泰文化事業公司
4. CSRone（2019）。GRI執行長：企業永續將成為主流顯學。取自https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/12117/3713038
5. 李秀玲（2010）。淺談「上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則」及相關配套機制推動情形。證券暨期貨月刊，第28卷第5期。
6. 台灣證券交易所（2004）。上市上櫃公司訂定道德行為準則參考範例。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
7. 台灣證券交易所（2010）。上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
8. 台灣證券交易所（2014）。上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法」。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
9. 陳雅慧（2012）。國泰金控一半台灣人是客戶。天下雜誌。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5041287
10. 國泰世華商業銀行介紹。取自https://www.cathaybk.com.tw/cathaybk/about/about/intro/history/
11. 楊雅智（2015）。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。證券暨期貨月刊，第33卷第1期。
12. KPMG（2018）。《企業因應全球永續發展目標(SDGs)分析報告》。取自https://home.kpmg/tw/zh/home/insights/2018/02/how-to-report-on-the-sdgs.html
13. CSRone（2020）。《2020臺灣暨亞太永續報告現況與趨勢》。取自https://csrone.com/reports/3650
14. 劉世慶（2020）。17項SDGs的永續發展目標，最多台灣企業選的3項是？，取自https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41407
15. 中華民國外交部（2017）。環保署長李應元赴紐約出席永續發展國際研討會發布我國首部「國家自願檢視報告」。第157號新聞稿
16. 新北市政府（2019）。《2019新北市地方自願檢視報告》。新北市政府秘書處
17. 黃正忠（2007）。全球企業永續性報告現況。證券櫃檯，96年8月號。
18. 李宜卿（2010）。公民參與的機會與挑戰—台灣審議民主制度化之研究。doi:10.6342/NTU.2010.03403
19. 國發所（2019）。國發所師生參訪國合會總部，瞭解我國國際開發援助。取自https://www.nccu.edu.tw/p/405-1000-6793,c87.php?Lang=zh-tw
20. 中華民國外交部（2009）。援外政策白皮書。
21. 魏慧（2012）。世界五百強企業的生命周期及其決定因素。
22. 經濟部中小企業處（2012）。2012中小企業白皮書。
23. 劉純佑譯（2016）。企業存活率恐怖真相。哈佛商業評論。
24. 貝婉莉（2017）。國際福利服務發展拓點歷程之探究－台灣明月社會福利機構於東南亞拓點案例分析。
25. 經貿事務司（2007）。台灣援外工作與國際合作。外交部通訊。第27卷第1期。
26. 傅中（2018）。1895-1985台灣歷史知多少？。金剛出版事業有限公司。
27. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2015）。第一屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
28. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2016）。第二屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
29. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2017）。第三屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
30. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2018）。第四屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
31. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2019）。第五屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
32. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2020）。第六屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明

英文文獻：
1. Sheldon, Oliver (1923). The Philosophy of Management. London ： Kenneth Thompson.
2. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Retrieved April 5, 2020, from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=4y0vAAAAMAAJ
3. Yang, L., & Guo, Z. (2014). Evolution of CSR Concept in the West and China. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(2), 819.
4. Latapí Agudelo, M.A., Jóhannsdóttir, L. & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 4, 1 Retrieved : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
5. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 19-46. Retrieved :http://satellinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/AHistoryofCSRConceptsPractices.Oxford.2008.pdf
6. Bhaduri, S. N., & Selarka, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility around the world—An overview of theoretical framework, and evolution. In Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility of Indian companies. Springer, Singapore. Retrieved : https://reurl.cc/j7R8dp
7. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California management review, 2(3), 70-76. Retrieved : https://search.proquest.com/docview/206291990?pq-origsite=gscholar
8. Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California management review, 2(4), 54-61. Retrieved : https://www.williamcfrederick.com/articles/GrowingConcern.pdf
9. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 11 , 2020, from http://www.morididattica.it/files/Friedman%201970%20b7.pdf
10. D.J. Vogel. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 19-45. Retrieved April 11 , 2020, from http://www.untag-smd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_Digital_1/CORPORATE%20SOCIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY%20The_Market_for_Virtue_The_Potential_and_Limits_of_Corporate_Socia.pdf
11. Waterhouse, B. C. (2017). The personal, the political and the profitable: Business and protest culture, 1960s-1980s. Financial History, Spring, 2017, 14–17.
12. Stephanie Vierra. (2019). Green Building Standards And Certification Systems. Vierra Design & Education Services, LLC Retrieved : https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and-certification-systems
13. Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59-67. doi:10.2307/41164877
14. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 27(1), 42-56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/255956?seq=14#metadata_info_tab_contents
15. Archie B. Carroll. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Centerpiece of Competing and Complementary Frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 87-96
16. John Elkington. (2018). 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s Why It’s Time to Rethink It. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved : https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it
17. Corporate Register. https://www.corporateregister.com/
18. United Nations Global Compact. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
19. N. Craig Smith. (2000). Changes in corporate practices in response to public interest advocacy and actions: the role of consumer boycotts and socially responsible corporate social responsibility. London Business School. Retrieved: https://www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/academic-research/c/changes-in-corporate-practices-in-response-to-public-interest-advoc-ff1e3ab7328d44d9b5fbc19e6170c9f7
20. William C. Frederick. (1994). From CSR1 TO CSR2: the maturing of business-and-society thought. Business and Society. Retrieved: https://www.williamcfrederick.com/articles/FromCSRtoCSR.pdf
21. Werther Jr, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317-324. Retrieved: http://hajarian.com/brand/1-s2.0-s000768130400134x-main.pdf
22. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92. Retrieved : https://www.comfama.com/contenidos/servicios/Gerenciasocial/html/Cursos/Columbia/Lecturas/Strategy-Society.pdf
23. Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review. Retrieved: http://www.coherence360.com/praxis/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Michael_Porter_Creating_Shared_Value.pdf
24. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR Web site reporting. Business & Society, 44, 415-441.
25. Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Pinter Press.
26. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American political science review, 78(3), 734-749. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1961840?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
27. Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 ,147-160 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
28. Lammers, J. C., & Garcia, M. A. (2017). Institutional theory approaches. The international encyclopedia of organizational communication, 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314712184_Institutional_Theory_Approaches
29. Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
30. O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility communication: An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909358747
31. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472-500. DOI: 10.2307/2393735
32. Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2016). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of business ethics, 136(3), 503-522. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z
33. Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, 26(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
34. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 33(2), 404-424. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
35. the GRI’s history. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/gri-history/Pages/GRI`s%20history.aspx
36. Marga Hoek. (2018). The Trillion Dollar Shift.
37. United Nations Development Programme. What are the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
38. Gavin E.R. Wilson. (2015) Billions to trillions: Financing the Global Goals. Retrieved from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/billions-to-trillions-financing-the-global-goals
39. The SDGs are a call to action for business and governments know it. Business call to action. Retrieved from: https://www.businesscalltoaction.org/news/sdgs-are-call-action-business-and-governments-know-it
40. Business & Sustainable Development Commission. (2017). Better Business Better World: The Report of the Business & Sustainable Development Commission, Retrieved from: http://report.businesscommission.org/uploads/BetterBiz-BetterWorld_170215_012417.pdf
41. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
42. Europe commission. Corporate Social Responsibility & Responsible Business Conduct. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility_es?2nd-language=en
43. UNIDO. What is CSR? Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr
44. Fehling, M., Nelson, B. D., & Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: a literature review. Global public health, 8(10), 1109-1122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877943/
45. Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, New York. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/mdg-report-2015.html
46. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
47. United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. https://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/millennium_summit.shtml
48. Lucci, P. (2012), Post-2015 MDGs: What Role for Business?, Overseas Development Institute, London. https://www.odi.org/publications/6645-post-2015-millennium-development-goals-what-role-business
49. Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of cleaner production, 16(17), 1838-1846. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652608000401?casa_token=IMx6k36zLIwAAAAA:l-_cVHPSnx8J0BhrWMp_IaaQaW7qJduGLkoq0mg2J4qFAw7qHPOXm3CBiY5axh5umGZXjYbphSTB
50. BCtA & GRI. (2016). MEASURING IMPACT : How Business Accelerates the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from : https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Meassuring%20Impact_BCtA_GRI.pdf
51. North, D. C. (1993). The new institutional economics and development. Economic History.
52. Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute. Marshall Plan. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/marshall-plan
53. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in comparative international development, 36(1), 111-141. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02687587
54. Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.unilever.com/Images/unilever-annual-report-and-accounts-2018_tcm244-534881_en.pdf
55. Channell, Curmi, Whitton & Fordham. (2018). UN Sustainable Development Goals Pathways to Success-A Systematic Framework for Aligning Investments. Retrieved from: https://www.citivelocity.com/citigps/un-sustainable-development-goals/
56. Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Reporting: A Practical Guide. (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI_UNGC_Reporting-on-SDGs_Practical_Guide.pdf
57. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
107363022
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363022
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林月雲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Yeh-Yunen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 游宜珍zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Yu, Yi-Chenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 游宜珍zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yu, Yi-Chenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-八月-2020 18:42:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-八月-2020 18:42:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-八月-2020 18:42:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0107363022en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131346-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107363022zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 聯合國在2015年通過《2030年永續發展議程》，包含17項「永續發展目標」(Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs)，以「沒有人是局外人」(No One Leave Behind)為精神，致力在2030年前，結合政府、企業、民間機構等力量，終結貧窮、保護地球，達到人類擁有和平與繁榮的生活藍圖(UN，2015)。在第17項目標裡的子目標，提及財務融資方面，已開發國家可充分藉由政府開發協助（Official development assistance，ODA）計畫，私部門則透過外國直接投資（Foreign direct investments ，FDI）的方式進行努力。近一步討論各方利害關係人如何參與其中，一起達到這個願景，是全球迫切的下一步行動。

本研究聚焦於台灣的公部門財團法人國際合作發展基金會（簡稱：國合會）（ICDF, International Cooperation and Development Fund）與私部門國泰金融控股股份有限公司（簡稱：國泰金控）（Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.），以公開資料與半結構式的訪談，了解雙方的永續歷史脈絡，透過制度理論與路徑依賴為分析工具，了解兩者實踐永續發展目標SDGs的動機、實踐方法、與對組織的影響與意義為何。

綜合發現，組織內部對永續的正面態度促使兩者積極參與這次永續發展目標SDGs倡議，實踐過程中，在公司高層的政策會議中，永續發展目標SDGs作為討論組織未來發展的參考框架，讓永續發展目標SDGs融入組織的政策制定脈絡裡。最後，從兩個組織的實踐過程中，本研究發現永續發展目標SDGs成為一個良好的溝通工具，能夠降低個體間對永續認知的落差與組織溝通的障礙，促進組織對內與對外的永續發展討論。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was adopted at the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in New York in September 2015. UN pledge that no one will be left behind and commit to dedicating to ending poverty, protecting the planet, and accelerating peace and prosperity before 2030. Governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals will contribute to achieving these goals (UN, 2015). In Goal 17, referring to finance target, developed countries can implement fully their official development assistance (ODA) commitments, and the private sector through foreign direct investment (FDI). How stakeholders engage in this vision is a crucial next step in the world.

This research focuses on Taiwan’s public sector, International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF) and the private sector Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.. The information accessed from secondary data and semi-structured interviews to understand the sustainable history of both parties and analyzed the motives, methods, and impact of implementation SDGs with institutional theory and path dependence.

To summarize the analysis and discussion of this study, the internal positive attitude is a significant factor to induce organization to adopt SDGs implementation. In the process of practice, SDGs are used as the reference framework to discuss the future strategy in the company`s top executives meeting. Finally, this study found that the SDGs have become a good communication tool, which can reduce the gap between individuals` perceptions of sustainability and organizational communication barriers, and promote organizational internal and external discussions on sustainability.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
目次 IV
圖次 VIII
表次 IX
第一章　緒論 1
第一節　研究背景與動機 1
第二節　研究問題與目的 4
第二章　文獻探討 5
第一節、永續發展目標SDGs 5
一、背景與發展歷程 5
二、全球夥伴關係的官方角色 11
第二節、企業社會責任 12
一、企業社會責任CSR發展的歷史 12
二、臺灣企業社會責任歷史 18
三、企業社會責任定義 19
第三節、制度理論 21
一、制度的定義與變遷 21
二、制度理論與企業社會責任的相關研究 23
三、路徑依賴理論 24
第三章　研究方法 26
第一節 研究範圍 26
第二節 研究架構 27
第四章　個案訪談 29
第一節 國合會 29
一、組織發展與沿革 29
二、台灣國際援助發展歷程 29
三、永續發展目標SDGs對組織的意義與影響 33
第二節 國泰金控 34
一、公司發展與沿革 34
二、CSR歷史背景 37
三、永續發展目標SDGs對公司的意義與影響 44
第五章　討論 46
第一節 組織永續發展制度化過程 46
一、國合會 46
二、國泰金控 49
第二節 永續專案流程比較 55
一、國合會 55
二、國泰金控 57
第三節 永續發展目標SDGs給公部門與私部門的機會 60
一、國際發展 60
二、業務發展 61
第六章　結論與發現 63
第一節 影響公部門與私部門推動永續發展目標SDGs的外部因素 63
第二節 如何實踐永續發展目標SDGs 64
第三節 永續發展目標SDGs的意義與影響 66
第四節 研究限制 70
參考文獻 71
附錄 84		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2517240 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363022en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 永續發展目標SDGszh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際援助zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度理論zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 台灣公部門與私部門如何實踐永續發展目標zh_TW
dc.title (題名) How Taiwan’s Public and Private Sectors Implement Sustainable Development Goalsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻：
1. 台灣B lab官網http://blab.tw/
2. 林建煌（2019）。管理學概論（五版）。華泰文化事業公司。
3. 黃良志，黃家齊，溫金豐，廖文志&韓志翔（2017）。人力資源管理理論與實務（四版）。華泰文化事業公司
4. CSRone（2019）。GRI執行長：企業永續將成為主流顯學。取自https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/12117/3713038
5. 李秀玲（2010）。淺談「上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則」及相關配套機制推動情形。證券暨期貨月刊，第28卷第5期。
6. 台灣證券交易所（2004）。上市上櫃公司訂定道德行為準則參考範例。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
7. 台灣證券交易所（2010）。上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
8. 台灣證券交易所（2014）。上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法」。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
9. 陳雅慧（2012）。國泰金控一半台灣人是客戶。天下雜誌。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5041287
10. 國泰世華商業銀行介紹。取自https://www.cathaybk.com.tw/cathaybk/about/about/intro/history/
11. 楊雅智（2015）。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。證券暨期貨月刊，第33卷第1期。
12. KPMG（2018）。《企業因應全球永續發展目標(SDGs)分析報告》。取自https://home.kpmg/tw/zh/home/insights/2018/02/how-to-report-on-the-sdgs.html
13. CSRone（2020）。《2020臺灣暨亞太永續報告現況與趨勢》。取自https://csrone.com/reports/3650
14. 劉世慶（2020）。17項SDGs的永續發展目標，最多台灣企業選的3項是？，取自https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41407
15. 中華民國外交部（2017）。環保署長李應元赴紐約出席永續發展國際研討會發布我國首部「國家自願檢視報告」。第157號新聞稿
16. 新北市政府（2019）。《2019新北市地方自願檢視報告》。新北市政府秘書處
17. 黃正忠（2007）。全球企業永續性報告現況。證券櫃檯，96年8月號。
18. 李宜卿（2010）。公民參與的機會與挑戰—台灣審議民主制度化之研究。doi:10.6342/NTU.2010.03403
19. 國發所（2019）。國發所師生參訪國合會總部，瞭解我國國際開發援助。取自https://www.nccu.edu.tw/p/405-1000-6793,c87.php?Lang=zh-tw
20. 中華民國外交部（2009）。援外政策白皮書。
21. 魏慧（2012）。世界五百強企業的生命周期及其決定因素。
22. 經濟部中小企業處（2012）。2012中小企業白皮書。
23. 劉純佑譯（2016）。企業存活率恐怖真相。哈佛商業評論。
24. 貝婉莉（2017）。國際福利服務發展拓點歷程之探究－台灣明月社會福利機構於東南亞拓點案例分析。
25. 經貿事務司（2007）。台灣援外工作與國際合作。外交部通訊。第27卷第1期。
26. 傅中（2018）。1895-1985台灣歷史知多少？。金剛出版事業有限公司。
27. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2015）。第一屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
28. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2016）。第二屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
29. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2017）。第三屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
30. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2018）。第四屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
31. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2019）。第五屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
32. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2020）。第六屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明

英文文獻：
1. Sheldon, Oliver (1923). The Philosophy of Management. London ： Kenneth Thompson.
2. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Retrieved April 5, 2020, from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=4y0vAAAAMAAJ
3. Yang, L., & Guo, Z. (2014). Evolution of CSR Concept in the West and China. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(2), 819.
4. Latapí Agudelo, M.A., Jóhannsdóttir, L. & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 4, 1 Retrieved : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
5. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 19-46. Retrieved :http://satellinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/AHistoryofCSRConceptsPractices.Oxford.2008.pdf
6. Bhaduri, S. N., & Selarka, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility around the world—An overview of theoretical framework, and evolution. In Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility of Indian companies. Springer, Singapore. Retrieved : https://reurl.cc/j7R8dp
7. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California management review, 2(3), 70-76. Retrieved : https://search.proquest.com/docview/206291990?pq-origsite=gscholar
8. Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California management review, 2(4), 54-61. Retrieved : https://www.williamcfrederick.com/articles/GrowingConcern.pdf
9. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 11 , 2020, from http://www.morididattica.it/files/Friedman%201970%20b7.pdf
10. D.J. Vogel. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 19-45. Retrieved April 11 , 2020, from http://www.untag-smd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_Digital_1/CORPORATE%20SOCIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY%20The_Market_for_Virtue_The_Potential_and_Limits_of_Corporate_Socia.pdf
11. Waterhouse, B. C. (2017). The personal, the political and the profitable: Business and protest culture, 1960s-1980s. Financial History, Spring, 2017, 14–17.
12. Stephanie Vierra. (2019). Green Building Standards And Certification Systems. Vierra Design & Education Services, LLC Retrieved : https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and-certification-systems
13. Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59-67. doi:10.2307/41164877
14. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 27(1), 42-56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/255956?seq=14#metadata_info_tab_contents
15. Archie B. Carroll. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Centerpiece of Competing and Complementary Frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 87-96
16. John Elkington. (2018). 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s Why It’s Time to Rethink It. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved : https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it
17. Corporate Register. https://www.corporateregister.com/
18. United Nations Global Compact. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
19. N. Craig Smith. (2000). Changes in corporate practices in response to public interest advocacy and actions: the role of consumer boycotts and socially responsible corporate social responsibility. London Business School. Retrieved: https://www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/academic-research/c/changes-in-corporate-practices-in-response-to-public-interest-advoc-ff1e3ab7328d44d9b5fbc19e6170c9f7
20. William C. Frederick. (1994). From CSR1 TO CSR2: the maturing of business-and-society thought. Business and Society. Retrieved: https://www.williamcfrederick.com/articles/FromCSRtoCSR.pdf
21. Werther Jr, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317-324. Retrieved: http://hajarian.com/brand/1-s2.0-s000768130400134x-main.pdf
22. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92. Retrieved : https://www.comfama.com/contenidos/servicios/Gerenciasocial/html/Cursos/Columbia/Lecturas/Strategy-Society.pdf
23. Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review. Retrieved: http://www.coherence360.com/praxis/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Michael_Porter_Creating_Shared_Value.pdf
24. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR Web site reporting. Business & Society, 44, 415-441.
25. Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Pinter Press.
26. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American political science review, 78(3), 734-749. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1961840?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
27. Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 ,147-160 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
28. Lammers, J. C., & Garcia, M. A. (2017). Institutional theory approaches. The international encyclopedia of organizational communication, 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314712184_Institutional_Theory_Approaches
29. Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
30. O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility communication: An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909358747
31. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472-500. DOI: 10.2307/2393735
32. Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2016). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of business ethics, 136(3), 503-522. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z
33. Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, 26(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
34. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 33(2), 404-424. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
35. the GRI’s history. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/gri-history/Pages/GRI`s%20history.aspx
36. Marga Hoek. (2018). The Trillion Dollar Shift.
37. United Nations Development Programme. What are the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
38. Gavin E.R. Wilson. (2015) Billions to trillions: Financing the Global Goals. Retrieved from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/billions-to-trillions-financing-the-global-goals
39. The SDGs are a call to action for business and governments know it. Business call to action. Retrieved from: https://www.businesscalltoaction.org/news/sdgs-are-call-action-business-and-governments-know-it
40. Business & Sustainable Development Commission. (2017). Better Business Better World: The Report of the Business & Sustainable Development Commission, Retrieved from: http://report.businesscommission.org/uploads/BetterBiz-BetterWorld_170215_012417.pdf
41. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
42. Europe commission. Corporate Social Responsibility & Responsible Business Conduct. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility_es?2nd-language=en
43. UNIDO. What is CSR? Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr
44. Fehling, M., Nelson, B. D., & Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: a literature review. Global public health, 8(10), 1109-1122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877943/
45. Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, New York. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/mdg-report-2015.html
46. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
47. United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. https://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/millennium_summit.shtml
48. Lucci, P. (2012), Post-2015 MDGs: What Role for Business?, Overseas Development Institute, London. https://www.odi.org/publications/6645-post-2015-millennium-development-goals-what-role-business
49. Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of cleaner production, 16(17), 1838-1846. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652608000401?casa_token=IMx6k36zLIwAAAAA:l-_cVHPSnx8J0BhrWMp_IaaQaW7qJduGLkoq0mg2J4qFAw7qHPOXm3CBiY5axh5umGZXjYbphSTB
50. BCtA & GRI. (2016). MEASURING IMPACT : How Business Accelerates the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from : https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Meassuring%20Impact_BCtA_GRI.pdf
51. North, D. C. (1993). The new institutional economics and development. Economic History.
52. Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute. Marshall Plan. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/marshall-plan
53. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in comparative international development, 36(1), 111-141. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02687587
54. Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.unilever.com/Images/unilever-annual-report-and-accounts-2018_tcm244-534881_en.pdf
55. Channell, Curmi, Whitton & Fordham. (2018). UN Sustainable Development Goals Pathways to Success-A Systematic Framework for Aligning Investments. Retrieved from: https://www.citivelocity.com/citigps/un-sustainable-development-goals/
56. Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Reporting: A Practical Guide. (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI_UNGC_Reporting-on-SDGs_Practical_Guide.pdf
57. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001010en_US