| dc.contributor.advisor | 王梅玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wang, Mei-Ling | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 高維平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Kao, Wei-Ping | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 高維平 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Kao, Wei-Ping | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2020 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 3-Aug-2020 18:50:35 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 3-Aug-2020 18:50:35 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 3-Aug-2020 18:50:35 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0107913014 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131393 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 107913014 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究旨在瞭解美國與臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度，比較兩國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證之發展歷史、專業能力標準與現況，包括：認證制度種類與功能、認證資格與級別、認證機構、認證方式與範圍、認證更新辦法、認證程序，以及認證制度價值，做為我國發展醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度之參考依據。研究採用比較研究法與深度訪談法進行分析。研究結果經分析得到以下結論：一、美國與臺灣皆針對健康資訊專業人員建立認證制度，顯示兩國對於健康資訊從業人員專業能力的重視程度；二、美國具有詳盡之專業人員能力標準，臺灣則無相關規範；三、美國認證兼顧健康資訊專業人員之學位、繼續教育與個人成就，以及領域相關工作經驗，臺灣側重於健康資訊領域之知識與著作成就；四、美國認證制度在職業發展、專業地位與薪資頗具價值，而臺灣目前較無實質增益。根據研究結果，本研究分別針對該領域組織或個人提出建議，以提升健康資訊管理的專業品質：一、對醫學圖書館學會之建議：(一)建立醫學圖書館專業人員之能力標準、(二)促使臺灣醫學圖書館專業人員認證邁向法制化發展，以確立健康資訊專業人員的專業地位；二、對健康資訊機構之建議：(一)聘僱具備健康資訊專業人員認證者、(二)提升具有認證者之薪資與專業地位，以確保健康資訊服務之品質；三、對健康資訊工作人員之建議：健康資訊領域之從業人員必須自行尋求各種專業成長之管道，持續性的維持繼續教育與職業發展，同時積極參與專業學會之認證，以提升個人專業形象。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This research mainly focuses on the certification for Medical Library Association professionals of the United States and Taiwan, and compares the developmental history, professional competence standards, including types and functions of certification systems, certification qualifications and levels, certificate authority, certification methods and scope, certification renewal, certification procedures, and certification system value beteew the two countries. Using comparative method and in-depth interview as the research tools, the present study aimed at providing a useful reference for the Taiwan Medical Library Association which is responsible for the certification for Medical Library Association professionals.The results lead to the following conclusion: 1. Both the United States and Taiwan have established a certification system for health information professionals, showing the emphasis of the two countries on the professional competence of health information professionals; 2. The United States has established detailed professional competence standards, while Taiwan has no relevant regulations; 3. In the United States, certification takes into account the degree, professional accomplishments of health information professionals, as well as related work experience in the field, while Taiwan focuses on the knowledge of health information and academic publications; 4. In the United States, certification system is valuable in career development, professional status and salary; however, certification is not associated with benefits in terms of professional recognition or career development in Taiwan .The results of the current study may highlight some recommendations for relevant organizations and personal to improve the professional quality of healthcare information management. For the Medical Library Association to establish the professional status of healthcare information professional, it would be important to (1) establish assessment standards for competence, and (2) incorporate the requirement for qualified personnel into the Hospital accreditation system. For health information organizations to ensure with-quality since, it is suggested that they could (1) hire certified health information professionals, and (2) improve the salary and professional status of certified professional. For the continual education and career development of health information staff, they should seek various professional growth channels and actively participate in on-the-job training to update their knowledge and skill in the field. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1第一節 問題陳述與研究動機 1第二節 研究目的 3第三節 研究問題 4第四節 名詞解釋 4第二章 文獻探討 7第一節 醫學圖書館與健康資訊專業人員之意涵與特色 7第二節 健康資訊專業人員之認證 10第三節 醫學圖書館專業人員之專業資格與專業能力 16第三章 研究方法 23第一節 研究範圍與限制 23第二節 研究設計 24第三節 研究方法 26第四節 資料蒐集與分析 28第五節 研究實施步驟 30第四章 美國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度 35第一節 美國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度與發展歷史 35第二節 美國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證之專業能力標準 41第三節 美國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度現況 49第四節 美國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度價值 61第五章 臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度 63第一節 臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度與發展歷史 63第二節 臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證之專業能力標準 67第三節 臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度現況 69第四節 臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度價值 74第六章 綜合比較 77第一節 兩國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度與發展歷史之比較 77第二節 兩國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證能力標準之比較 78第三節 兩國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度現況之比較 80第四節 兩國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度價值之比較 88第五節 綜合討論 89第七章 結論與建議 91第一節 結論 91第二節 建議 92第三節 未來研究建議 93參考文獻 95附錄一 Medical Library Association - Determine Your Eligibility for Academy Membership 101附錄二 MLA Competencies for Lifelong Learning and Professional Success 105附錄三 臺灣醫學圖書館學會《醫學圖書館專業人員認證辦法》 111附錄四 臺灣醫學圖書館學會《醫學圖書館專業人員認證辦法與施行細則》 113附錄五 訪談大綱 115 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 6979109 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107913014 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 醫學圖書館 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 圖書館專業人員 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 認證制度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Medical libraries | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Library professionals | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Certification | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 美國與臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度比較研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Comparative Study on the Certification for Medical Library Association Professionals between the United States and Taiwan | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鈕文英（2017）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市：雙葉書廊。馮佳（2015）。國外圖書館職業資格認證推行方式研究。圖書館雜誌，34(2)，68-73。楊美華、劉欣蓓（2003）。知識經濟時代專門圖書館員知能探究。中國圖書館學會會報，70，4-17。葉宗顯等(譯) (2013)。社會研究方法指南。新北市：韋伯文化國際。（Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L. & Brannen, J., 2008）臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2016）。臺灣醫學圖書館學會章程。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xb69cO-J6KeTQwNTs_yxOfGwhWQuKGV_/view臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2017a）。國內首次圖書館員認證考試 37名獲頒高級醫學圖書館管理師證書。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?p=7239&lang=zh臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2017b）。醫學圖書館專業人員認證方式說明。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?p=7031&lang=zh臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2018）。第2屆 學會各委員會與工作計劃。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?page_id=7363&lang=zh臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2019a）。醫學圖書館專業人員接受繼續教育積分認定及證書更新辦法。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LgaADsFVxQ1P0XP7AWRbYkOoV7NXTmfD/view臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2019b）。醫學圖書館專業人員認證辦法。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fPFSTjU7LLcSwLcFD-sJMG-Mdx4M6bvt/view臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2019c）。醫學圖書館專業人員認證辦法與施行細則。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VO9FL6TQ2Siniqmydftfd7wLofDaxVTx/view臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2019d）。醫學圖書館管理師考試考題範例。取自http://www.taiwanmla.org/?uamfiletype=attachment&uamgetfile=http://www.taiwanmla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/%E9%86%AB%E5%AD%B8%E5%9C%96%E6%9B%B8%E9%A4%A8%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E5%B8%AB%E8%80%83%E8%A9%A6%E8%80%83%E9%A1%8C%E7%AF%84%E4%BE%8B.doc臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2020a）。[TMLA] 109年醫學圖書館管理師認證–以著作申請。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?page_id=8371&lang=zh臺灣醫學圖書館學會（2020b）。109年醫學圖書館專業人員認證方式說明。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?page_id=8365&lang=zh劉一德（2019）。問題出在「大政府」。取自https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1277812錢昆、崔麗媛（2011）。我國圖書館員職業資格認證制度探究。長春師範學院學報，30(4)，168-171。薛理桂（1994）。比較圖書館學導論。臺北市：臺灣學生書局。蘇諼（1999）。臺灣地區醫學圖書館員繼續教育需求之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC87-2415-H-030-007）。臺北縣新莊市：輔仁大學圖書資訊學系。蘇諼（2003）。數位時代醫學圖書館之內部空間規劃。圖書與資訊學刊，47，1-14。蘇諼（2006）。醫療專業人員的資訊行為。圖書館學與資訊科學，32(2)，32-41。American Library Association(ALA). (2009). ALA’s Core Competences of Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdfAmerican Library Association(ALA). (2016). Become a Librarian. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/libcareers/becomeArnold, P. A., Braddock Communications., & U.S. Department of State`s Bureau of International Information Programs(IIP). (2004). About America : how the United States is governed. Retrieved from https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/infousa/zhtw/PUBS/AmGov/governed.pdfBaker, L. M., Kars, M., & Petty, J. (2004). Health sciences librarians` attitudes toward the Academy of Health Information Professionals. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 92(3), 323–333.Bell, J. A. (1996). History of the Medical Library Association`s credentialing program. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84(3), 320-333.Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative Method in Education. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Bramble, J., Steidinger, S., Hamasu, C., & Austin, M. (2018). Clinical Medical Librarian Licensure: Pros versus Cons. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(3), 306-311. doi:10.1080/02763869.2018.1477719Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor(BLS). (2019). Occupational Outlook Handbook, Librarians. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/librarians.htmChartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals(CILIP). (2018). Professional Registration. Retrieved from https://www.cilip.org.uk/page/ProfessionalRegistrationChartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals(CILIP). (2019). PKSB (Professional Knowledge & Skills Base) for Knowledge Management. Retrieved from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cilip.org.uk/resource/group/d8c83290-f520-4c10-83fe-998144595612/cilip-kmpksb-january2019v3.pdfDrake, M. A. (2005). Encyclopedia of library and information science. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Gartland, H. J. (1968). The Veterans Administration library program. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 56(1), 21-23.Medical Library Association(MLA). (1985). Proceedings, Eighty-fourth Annual Meeting Medical Library Association, Inc. Denver, Colorado May 25-31, 1984. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 73(1), 94-119.Medical Library Association(MLA). (2007). Professional Competencies. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/education/policy/Medical Library Association(MLA). (2010). Code of Ethics for Health Sciences Librarianship. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/page/code-of-ethicsMedical Library Association(MLA). (2015). Health Information Profession. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=53Medical Library Association(MLA). (2016). How the Academy credential benefits your career. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1265Medical Library Association(MLA). (2017). Professional Competencies. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/page/test-competenciesMedical Library Association(MLA). (2018). Academy of Health Information Professionals (AHIP). Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/academy/Medical Library Association(MLA). (2019a). Determine Your Eligibility for Academy Membership. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=323Medical Library Association(MLA). (2019b). Explore a Career in Health Sciences Information. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=352Medical Library Association(MLA). (2020a). Academy Roster. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=350Medical Library Association(MLA). (2020b). MLA Committees. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=440Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.a). About MLA. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=21Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.b). Academy of Health Information Professionals (AHIP). Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=41Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.c). Application Instructions for AHIP Member, Senior or Distinguished Level. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1268Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.d). Instructions for Renewing Your AHIP Membership at Your Current Level. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1270Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.e). Professional Accomplishments Points Index. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=438#teachingMyers, B. A., & Rodriguez, B. (2016). How do early career health sciences information professionals gain competencies?. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 104(3), 215–220. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.006Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.Roper, F. W. (2006). The medical library association`s professional development program: A look back at the way ahead. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(1), 8-18. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6814/NCCU202001105 | en_US |
