學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 從返鄉實踐探討台灣都市原住民青年的部落地方認同 — 以七佳部落旅外青年參與七佳青年部落行動為例
Exploring Taiwan Urban Indigenous Youths’ Place Identity of Hometown Through a Collective Cultural Practice — a case study of urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ participation in the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project作者 徐嘉榮
Shiu, Jia-Rung貢獻者 官大偉
Kuan, Da-Wei
徐嘉榮
Shiu, Jia-Rung關鍵詞 地方感
都市（旅外）原住民青年
社會地理學
七佳部落
社會關係
老七佳
Vinqacan (祖靈屋)
Social Geography
Sense of Place
Urban Indigenous Youths
Social Interrelation
New Tjuvecekadan
Tjuvecekadan
Vinqacan日期 2020 上傳時間 2-Sep-2020 12:31:00 (UTC+8) 摘要 自1960年代起台灣經濟起飛，隨之而產生的原住民人口移居都會區，都市原住民人口劇增。而各式各樣有關原住民移居都會區的數據之研究無法解釋旅外原住民青年與自身部落的連結。就此，本研究以七佳部落旅外原住民青年參與七佳青年部落行動為例2015-2016, 以Massey的Sense of Place (地方感) 視角探究旅外原住民青年對其部落之地方感。研究發現七佳旅外青年對七佳部落地方感形成有以下關鍵要素：第一、旅外青年在七佳部落與都會區的生活經驗而各別形成的社會關係啟發了他們對於七佳部落認同的需求。第二、七佳旅外青年對七佳家族成員的責任。三、傳統領袖家族之旅外青年皆認為為持續部落傳統文化，守護七佳部落的Vinqacan (祖靈屋)為重要之責任。七佳部落的Vinqacan (祖靈屋)，為部落重要具靈性之場域，連結當地族人與其祖靈間的關係，構成七佳部落地方感之重要元素之一。再者，Vinqacan (祖靈屋)連結人與靈界的社會功能，挑戰了認為地方是由“人”的社會關係構成的Sense of Place (地方感)理論。
In Taiwan, the population of urban indigenous peoples is growing at an unprecedented speed due to the economic boom after the 1960s. A variety of statistics on indigenous people’s migration to urban areas fail to explain indigenous young peoples’ connections with their hometowns.Therefore, the study addresses the dynamics of urban indigenous youths’ connections with a qualitative case study of the urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ participation in the Tjuvecekadan Youth project from 2015-2016. The study deploys Massey’s Sense of Place to analyze the urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ sense of their hometown, New Tjuvecekadan.The study finds the salient factors for the urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ sense of New Tjuvecekadan. Firstly, their social interrelations within and outside Tjuvecekadan inspired the youths to find an identity with New Tjuvecekadan. Secondly, they had familial responsibility in New Tjuvecekadan. Thirdly, in the continuation of local cultural practice, youths from a chief family regarded the vinqacan in New Tjuvecekadan as a place to safeguard. The vinqacan, a spiritual locality in New Tjuvecekadan, reveals humans’ connection with the spiritual world, constituting a significant sense of New Tjuvecekadan. Such phenomenon challenges Massey’s sense of place to be between humans to humans’ constellation of social interrelation.參考文獻 All the Chinese Surnames are phonetically translated with the Wade－Giles System.CHINESE SOURCES《105年05月台閩縣市鄉鎮市區原住民族人口：都會比例》。取自原住民族委員會全球資訊網：http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/index.htmlChang & Lin張英華、林季平 (2008)。台北原住民族就業及生活狀況調查報告。臺北：台北縣政府原住民行政局。Chang, Chu & Fu 章英華、瞿海源、傅仰止主編 (1995)，《社會調查與分析：社會科學方法檢討與前瞻之一》，中研院民族所，頁150。Chang, Lin & Liu 張英華、林季平、劉千嘉(2010)。<台灣原住民的遷移以及社會經濟地位之變遷與現況>，黃樹民、張英華主編，《台灣原住民社會與政策發展》，頁：52-120。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。Chao, Liao & Chung趙秀英、廖秋吉、鍾興華 (2013)。《排灣族tjuvecekadan (老七佳)部落》。行政院原住民族委員會文化園區管理局。Chen 陳之烈 (1997)。《台灣原住民教育》。臺北：師大書苑。Chi 季紅瑋 (1996)。《台北都會區原住民族國中生壓力因應歷程之初探-以優勢觀點分析》。私立東吳大學社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。Chiang 江樹生 (1999)。《熱蘭遮城日誌，第二，三冊》，台南:台南市政府出版。Cho 卓石能 (2002)。《都市原住民學童族群認同與其自我概念生活適應之關係研究》。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。Chou 周德禛 (2001)。《排灣族教育: 民族誌的研究》。臺北市 :五南。Fu 傅仰止 (1995)。《追蹤調查與資料分析--以原住民城鄉遷移為例》，收錄於章英華、傅仰止、瞿海源主編 《社會調查與分析：社會科學方法檢討與前自信之一》，中研院民族所。He 何立民 (2006)。《原住民回鄉的家經驗、情感與詮釋－以台東地區25-35歲大專青年為例》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。Hsu 徐君臨 (2008)。《族群、認同與地方～以台灣原住民青少年為例》。中國文化大學地理研究所博士論文。Huang 黃約伯 (1999)。《台灣高等院校教育原住民學生生涯選擇及其他相關因素之研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。Kao 高婉芸 (2018)。《排灣族長女單身想婚經驗》。國立台南大學滋生與輔導學系碩士論文。Kou郭玉敏 (2019)。《儀式、記憶與政治行動：排灣望嘉文化遺產化的協調與認同》，國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。Kou郭東雄 (2003)。《台灣排灣族七佳舊社住居文化之研究》，國立台南師範學院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文。Kuo 郭東雄 (2013)。《臺灣排灣族石板屋聚落文化空間之研究 》。國立高雄師範大學地理學系博士論文。Li 李秋霞 (2010)。《排灣族大學生跨族群異性交友與擇偶觀點之研究》。國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。Liu & Chu 朱竑、劉博 (2011)。《地方感、地方依戀與地方認同等概念的辨析及研究啟示》，華南師範大學學報(自然科學版), 第1期, 頁1-8。Liu 劉千嘉 (2013)。<北部地區都市原住民的移徙與轉進 >，《地理學報》，69:83-104。Liu 劉若蘭 (2006)。 大專原住民族與漢族學生多元族群校園經驗與族群認同的發展 國立臺北教育大學學報,第19卷第2期(95年9月)頁307~338。Mika (匿名) (2016)。《文化部104年度青年村落文化行動計畫期末報告》。未出版。Pan 潘立夫 (1997)。《1996年排灣部落訪問及文明探索》, 頁38。屏東：屏東縣立文化中心。Su 蘇羿如 (2007)。《遷移中的台灣「都市」原住民》。國立空中大學社會科學系社會科學學報，15期，153-174。Tan 譚昌國 (1992)。《家、階層與人的觀念：以東部排灣族台版村為例的研究》，國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。Tan 譚昌國 (2007)。《排灣族》。台北市：三民書局股份有限公司。Tsai 蔡慧君 (2003)。《原住民知識菁英之學校經驗與族群認同》。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。Wu & Liu吳景雲、劉美慧(2006)。高等教育原住民學生學校適應之研究。2006年臺灣高等教育與學生事務國際學術研討會。台北:臺灣師大公民教育與活動領導學系主辦。Wu 吳乃德 (1993)。台灣族群政治理論的初探。在 族群關係與國家認同(張茂桂、 吳乃德、王甫昌、林忠正、林鶴玲、陳茂泰等著,頁 27- 51)。 台北:業強出版。Yang 楊士範 (1999)。《長嗣繼承制度與人口差別遷移：一個排灣族平和村城鄉移民的例子》，《思與言》，第37-1期，頁175。Yang 楊士範 (2005)。《(Piuma)排灣族、城鄉遷移與社會文化變遷》。台北：稻香。Yang 楊淑玲 (2000)。《破殼而出：十四位日出師院原住民女學生的教育經驗》。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。Yeh葉神保 (2002)。《排灣族caqovoqovolj（內文）社群遷徙與族群關係的探討》花蓮：國立東華大學族群關係研究所碩士論文。ENGLISH SOURCESBenedict Anderson (1911). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place. A philosophical history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: a short introduction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Cross, J. E. (2001). What is Sense of Place? Presented at Twelfth Headwaters Conference, November 2-4 2001. 1–14.D`Andrade, R. G. (1992). Afterword. In R.G. D`Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Dragos Simandan (2011). On Time, Place and Happiness. New Zealand Geographer, 67, 1-15.Erickson, E. (1964). Insight and responsibility: Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insight. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Florek, Magdalena (2011). "No place like home: Perspectives on place attachment and impacts on city management". Journal of Town & City Management. 1 (4): 346–354.Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. & Whatmore, S. (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition. London: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310-319.Hooks, B. (1990) Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. South End Press, Boston, MA.Judith, N. M., and Thomas K., N. (2013) Intercultural Communication in Contexts Sixth Edition. The U.S.: Harvard University Press.Knox, P. L. & Marston S. A. (2007). Human Geography: places and regions in global context. New Jersey: Pearson Education.Lewicka, M. (2011), Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, pp.207-230.Low, S.M. and Altman, I. (1992), ‘Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry’, in Altman, I. and Low, S.M. (eds)‘Place attachment’, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–12.Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and heaven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23. 47-61.Mark Currie (1988) Postmodern Narrative Theory. New York: ST. Martin’s Press.Massey, D. B. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity press.Matsuzawa, Kazuko (1976) "The native concept of Ta-djaran (One Road): A Study of Family Kinship among the Eastern Paiwan," Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 1(3): 505-36. (Japanese)Merrian, B. Sharan (2009). Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10, 147-169.Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.Rose, G. (1993) Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity, Cambridge.Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment & Behavior, 34. 561-581The Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://twh.boch.gov.tw/taiwan/index.aspx?lang=zh_twThe Statistical Yearbook of Chunrih Township Pingtung County (2016) No.15. the document retrieved fromhttps://www-ws.pthg.gov.tw/Upload/2015pthg/73/relfile/12830/391720/2ff9558a-83b4-41ac-93b9-7c22d8297379.pdfTuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Young, I.M. (1997) Interesting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
103461009資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103461009 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 官大偉 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Kuan, Da-Wei en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 徐嘉榮 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Shiu, Jia-Rung en_US dc.creator (作者) 徐嘉榮 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Shiu, Jia-Rung en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2020 12:31:00 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Sep-2020 12:31:00 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2020 12:31:00 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0103461009 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131714 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 103461009 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 自1960年代起台灣經濟起飛，隨之而產生的原住民人口移居都會區，都市原住民人口劇增。而各式各樣有關原住民移居都會區的數據之研究無法解釋旅外原住民青年與自身部落的連結。就此，本研究以七佳部落旅外原住民青年參與七佳青年部落行動為例2015-2016, 以Massey的Sense of Place (地方感) 視角探究旅外原住民青年對其部落之地方感。研究發現七佳旅外青年對七佳部落地方感形成有以下關鍵要素：第一、旅外青年在七佳部落與都會區的生活經驗而各別形成的社會關係啟發了他們對於七佳部落認同的需求。第二、七佳旅外青年對七佳家族成員的責任。三、傳統領袖家族之旅外青年皆認為為持續部落傳統文化，守護七佳部落的Vinqacan (祖靈屋)為重要之責任。七佳部落的Vinqacan (祖靈屋)，為部落重要具靈性之場域，連結當地族人與其祖靈間的關係，構成七佳部落地方感之重要元素之一。再者，Vinqacan (祖靈屋)連結人與靈界的社會功能，挑戰了認為地方是由“人”的社會關係構成的Sense of Place (地方感)理論。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In Taiwan, the population of urban indigenous peoples is growing at an unprecedented speed due to the economic boom after the 1960s. A variety of statistics on indigenous people’s migration to urban areas fail to explain indigenous young peoples’ connections with their hometowns.Therefore, the study addresses the dynamics of urban indigenous youths’ connections with a qualitative case study of the urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ participation in the Tjuvecekadan Youth project from 2015-2016. The study deploys Massey’s Sense of Place to analyze the urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ sense of their hometown, New Tjuvecekadan.The study finds the salient factors for the urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ sense of New Tjuvecekadan. Firstly, their social interrelations within and outside Tjuvecekadan inspired the youths to find an identity with New Tjuvecekadan. Secondly, they had familial responsibility in New Tjuvecekadan. Thirdly, in the continuation of local cultural practice, youths from a chief family regarded the vinqacan in New Tjuvecekadan as a place to safeguard. The vinqacan, a spiritual locality in New Tjuvecekadan, reveals humans’ connection with the spiritual world, constituting a significant sense of New Tjuvecekadan. Such phenomenon challenges Massey’s sense of place to be between humans to humans’ constellation of social interrelation. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents ACKNOWLEDGMENT iABSTRACT iii摘要 ivCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 11.1 Research Background 11.2 Research Motivation 21.3 Purpose of the study 31.4 Field Site 41.4.1 Introduction of New Tjuvecekadan 41.4.2 Cultural Practice of Tjuvecekadan People 8CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH DESIGN 112.1 Research Questions 112.2 Research Method 112.3 Narrative Analysis 122.4 Guide to the Reader 132.5 Introduction of the Interviewees 19CHAPTER 3. LITERATURE REVIEW 233.1 Indigenous Peoples’ Urban Migration 233.1.1 Contexts of Urban Indigenous Peoples 233.1.2 Indigenous Peoples’ Social Network in Urban Contexts 253.1.3 Urban Indigenous Youths 263.2 Paiwan Society 283.2.1 Paiwan Social Structure 283.2.2 Paiwan People’s Internal Migrating Patterns 343.3 Place and Identity 363.3.1 Humanistic Geographical Perspective 363.3.2 Feminist Perspective— Concept of Home 423.3.3 Social Geographical Perspective — ‘A Global Sense of Place’ 43CHAPTER 4. TJUVECEKADAN YOUTH PROJECT. 494.1 Introduction of the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project. 494.2 New Tjuvecekadan and Me 514.2.1 Childhood in New Tjuvecekadan 514.2.2 Junior and Senior High School in Urban Pingtung 554.2.3 College in Taipei City 574.3 The Tjuvecekadan Youth Project and Me 60CHAPTER 5. JOHN’S STORY 655.1 Growing Up 655.2 Indigenous Identity 665.3 Why Returning to New Tjuvecekadan? 735.4 Before 2015 -- Participant Motivation for Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 745.5 Experience of the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 2015-2016 755.6 After the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project, 2017 onwards 785.7 The Challenges of Returning to New Tjuvecekadan 835.8 Sense of Belonging to New Tjuvecekadan 835.9 Parents’ Role in Terms of Indigenous Culture 845.10 Primogeniture in New Tjuvecekadan 845.11 Significance of Tjuvecekadan – the slate stone house settlement 855.12 Significance of New Tjuvecekadan 86CHAPTER 6. MIKA’S STORY 876.1 Growing Up 876.2 Indigenous Identity 896.3 Why Returning New Tjuvecekadan? 976.4 Before 2015 -- Participant Motivation for Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 986.5 Experience of the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 2015-2016 1016.6 After the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 2017 Onwards 1046.7 The Challenges of Returning to New Tjuvecekadan 1086.8 Parents’ Role in Terms of Indigenous Culture 1126.9 Primogeniture in New Tjuvecekadan 1146.10 Significance of Tjuvecekadan – the slate stone house settlement 1166.11 Significance of New Tjuvecekadan 118CHAPTER 7. GARY’S STORY 1217.1 Growing Up 1217.2 Indigenous Identity 1227.3 Why Returning to New Tjuvecekadan? 1287.4 Before 2015--Participant Motivation for Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 1297.5 Experience of Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 2015-2016 1297.6 After the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project, 2017 onwards 1347.7 The Challenges of Returning to New Tjuvecekadan 1397.8 Sense of Belonging to New Tjuvecekadan 1407.9 Parents’ Role in Terms of Indigenous Culture 1426.10 Primogeniture in New Tjuvecekadan 1437.11 Significance of Tjuvecekadan – the slate stone house settlement 1437.12 Significance of New Tjuvecekadan 144CHAPTER 8. ANALYSIS and DISCUSSION 1458.1 Urban Youth Social Interrelation Within New Tjuvecekadan 1458.2 Experiences Between New Tjuvecekadan And Urban Areas Before Their Participation in The Tjuvecekadan Youth Project 1488.3 Sense of New Tjuvecekadan After the Project 1528.4 Overall Comparison 156CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSION 1619.1 Summary 1619.2 Answers to the Research Questions 1639.3 Reflections on the Theoretical Discussion of the Sense of Place 1649.4 Limitation 1659.5 Suggestions for the Future Research 166REFERENCE 168 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURESTable 1. Genealogy New Tjuvecekadan 10Figure 1. Locations of New Tjuvecekadan, Tjukarangan, and Tjuvecekadan 10Table 2. Glossary 14Table 3. Basic information of the interviewees 21Table 4. Interview Timetable 22Figure 2. Vinqacan in New Tjuvecekadan. 34Figure 3. Conceptual framework 48Table 5. Basic Comparison 147Figure 4. Conceptual Framework 158Table 6. Overall Comparison 159 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3723466 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103461009 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 地方感 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 都市（旅外）原住民青年 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會地理學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 七佳部落 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 老七佳 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Vinqacan (祖靈屋) zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Geography en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sense of Place en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Urban Indigenous Youths en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Interrelation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) New Tjuvecekadan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tjuvecekadan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Vinqacan en_US dc.title (題名) 從返鄉實踐探討台灣都市原住民青年的部落地方認同 — 以七佳部落旅外青年參與七佳青年部落行動為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Exploring Taiwan Urban Indigenous Youths’ Place Identity of Hometown Through a Collective Cultural Practice — a case study of urban Tjuvecekadan youths’ participation in the Tjuvecekadan Youth Project en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) All the Chinese Surnames are phonetically translated with the Wade－Giles System.CHINESE SOURCES《105年05月台閩縣市鄉鎮市區原住民族人口：都會比例》。取自原住民族委員會全球資訊網：http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/index.htmlChang & Lin張英華、林季平 (2008)。台北原住民族就業及生活狀況調查報告。臺北：台北縣政府原住民行政局。Chang, Chu & Fu 章英華、瞿海源、傅仰止主編 (1995)，《社會調查與分析：社會科學方法檢討與前瞻之一》，中研院民族所，頁150。Chang, Lin & Liu 張英華、林季平、劉千嘉(2010)。<台灣原住民的遷移以及社會經濟地位之變遷與現況>，黃樹民、張英華主編，《台灣原住民社會與政策發展》，頁：52-120。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。Chao, Liao & Chung趙秀英、廖秋吉、鍾興華 (2013)。《排灣族tjuvecekadan (老七佳)部落》。行政院原住民族委員會文化園區管理局。Chen 陳之烈 (1997)。《台灣原住民教育》。臺北：師大書苑。Chi 季紅瑋 (1996)。《台北都會區原住民族國中生壓力因應歷程之初探-以優勢觀點分析》。私立東吳大學社會工作學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。Chiang 江樹生 (1999)。《熱蘭遮城日誌，第二，三冊》，台南:台南市政府出版。Cho 卓石能 (2002)。《都市原住民學童族群認同與其自我概念生活適應之關係研究》。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。Chou 周德禛 (2001)。《排灣族教育: 民族誌的研究》。臺北市 :五南。Fu 傅仰止 (1995)。《追蹤調查與資料分析--以原住民城鄉遷移為例》，收錄於章英華、傅仰止、瞿海源主編 《社會調查與分析：社會科學方法檢討與前自信之一》，中研院民族所。He 何立民 (2006)。《原住民回鄉的家經驗、情感與詮釋－以台東地區25-35歲大專青年為例》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。Hsu 徐君臨 (2008)。《族群、認同與地方～以台灣原住民青少年為例》。中國文化大學地理研究所博士論文。Huang 黃約伯 (1999)。《台灣高等院校教育原住民學生生涯選擇及其他相關因素之研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。Kao 高婉芸 (2018)。《排灣族長女單身想婚經驗》。國立台南大學滋生與輔導學系碩士論文。Kou郭玉敏 (2019)。《儀式、記憶與政治行動：排灣望嘉文化遺產化的協調與認同》，國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。Kou郭東雄 (2003)。《台灣排灣族七佳舊社住居文化之研究》，國立台南師範學院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文。Kuo 郭東雄 (2013)。《臺灣排灣族石板屋聚落文化空間之研究 》。國立高雄師範大學地理學系博士論文。Li 李秋霞 (2010)。《排灣族大學生跨族群異性交友與擇偶觀點之研究》。國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。Liu & Chu 朱竑、劉博 (2011)。《地方感、地方依戀與地方認同等概念的辨析及研究啟示》，華南師範大學學報(自然科學版), 第1期, 頁1-8。Liu 劉千嘉 (2013)。<北部地區都市原住民的移徙與轉進 >，《地理學報》，69:83-104。Liu 劉若蘭 (2006)。 大專原住民族與漢族學生多元族群校園經驗與族群認同的發展 國立臺北教育大學學報,第19卷第2期(95年9月)頁307~338。Mika (匿名) (2016)。《文化部104年度青年村落文化行動計畫期末報告》。未出版。Pan 潘立夫 (1997)。《1996年排灣部落訪問及文明探索》, 頁38。屏東：屏東縣立文化中心。Su 蘇羿如 (2007)。《遷移中的台灣「都市」原住民》。國立空中大學社會科學系社會科學學報，15期，153-174。Tan 譚昌國 (1992)。《家、階層與人的觀念：以東部排灣族台版村為例的研究》，國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。Tan 譚昌國 (2007)。《排灣族》。台北市：三民書局股份有限公司。Tsai 蔡慧君 (2003)。《原住民知識菁英之學校經驗與族群認同》。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。Wu & Liu吳景雲、劉美慧(2006)。高等教育原住民學生學校適應之研究。2006年臺灣高等教育與學生事務國際學術研討會。台北:臺灣師大公民教育與活動領導學系主辦。Wu 吳乃德 (1993)。台灣族群政治理論的初探。在 族群關係與國家認同(張茂桂、 吳乃德、王甫昌、林忠正、林鶴玲、陳茂泰等著,頁 27- 51)。 台北:業強出版。Yang 楊士範 (1999)。《長嗣繼承制度與人口差別遷移：一個排灣族平和村城鄉移民的例子》，《思與言》，第37-1期，頁175。Yang 楊士範 (2005)。《(Piuma)排灣族、城鄉遷移與社會文化變遷》。台北：稻香。Yang 楊淑玲 (2000)。《破殼而出：十四位日出師院原住民女學生的教育經驗》。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。Yeh葉神保 (2002)。《排灣族caqovoqovolj（內文）社群遷徙與族群關係的探討》花蓮：國立東華大學族群關係研究所碩士論文。ENGLISH SOURCESBenedict Anderson (1911). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place. A philosophical history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: a short introduction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Cross, J. E. (2001). What is Sense of Place? Presented at Twelfth Headwaters Conference, November 2-4 2001. 1–14.D`Andrade, R. G. (1992). Afterword. In R.G. D`Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Dragos Simandan (2011). On Time, Place and Happiness. New Zealand Geographer, 67, 1-15.Erickson, E. (1964). Insight and responsibility: Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytic insight. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Florek, Magdalena (2011). "No place like home: Perspectives on place attachment and impacts on city management". Journal of Town & City Management. 1 (4): 346–354.Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. & Whatmore, S. (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition. London: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310-319.Hooks, B. (1990) Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. South End Press, Boston, MA.Judith, N. M., and Thomas K., N. (2013) Intercultural Communication in Contexts Sixth Edition. The U.S.: Harvard University Press.Knox, P. L. & Marston S. A. (2007). Human Geography: places and regions in global context. New Jersey: Pearson Education.Lewicka, M. (2011), Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, pp.207-230.Low, S.M. and Altman, I. (1992), ‘Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry’, in Altman, I. and Low, S.M. (eds)‘Place attachment’, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–12.Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and heaven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23. 47-61.Mark Currie (1988) Postmodern Narrative Theory. New York: ST. Martin’s Press.Massey, D. B. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity press.Matsuzawa, Kazuko (1976) "The native concept of Ta-djaran (One Road): A Study of Family Kinship among the Eastern Paiwan," Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 1(3): 505-36. (Japanese)Merrian, B. Sharan (2009). Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10, 147-169.Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.Rose, G. (1993) Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity, Cambridge.Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment & Behavior, 34. 561-581The Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://twh.boch.gov.tw/taiwan/index.aspx?lang=zh_twThe Statistical Yearbook of Chunrih Township Pingtung County (2016) No.15. the document retrieved fromhttps://www-ws.pthg.gov.tw/Upload/2015pthg/73/relfile/12830/391720/2ff9558a-83b4-41ac-93b9-7c22d8297379.pdfTuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Young, I.M. (1997) Interesting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001547 en_US
