學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 能源商業模式相關研究之文獻分析－以碩博士論文為分析標的
Literature Analysis of Business Model in Energy Sector: A Review of Dissertations and Theses作者 林品瑄
Lin, Pin-Hsuan貢獻者 洪為璽<br>季延平
Hung, Wei-Hsi<br>Chi，Yan-Ping
林品瑄
Lin, Pin-Hsuan關鍵詞 能源
商業模式
文獻分析
台灣
大陸
美國
Energy
Business Model
Literature Analysis
Taiwan
China
United States日期 2020 上傳時間 2-Sep-2020 13:17:27 (UTC+8) 摘要 伴隨2017年1月11日台灣電業法修正，台灣能源產業邁向自由市場的轉型向前邁進了一大步，然而過往壟斷的能源產業使得台灣對能源商業模式的探討相對有限，故本研究希望透過比較台灣、大陸、美國在能源商業模式上的差異，以供後續台灣相關議題的研究者參考。本研究以文獻分析法，蒐集來自台灣碩博士論文加值系統、PQDT（ProQuest Dissertations & Theses）、大陸優秀碩士學位論文全文數據庫中的台灣、美國、大陸的碩博士論文，一共整理出250篇文獻並以書目計量學進行進行分析與歸納統整，以比較三國之間在能源商業模式研究上發展之差異，並嘗試詮釋分析結果與差異來源。研究發現結果顯示台灣與大陸的碩博士論文在作者學門的比例、碩博士比例上都更為接近，而在議題的選擇上相似度也較高，台灣最為重視的能源技術服務業在大陸的論文題目與關鍵字排名也都位居前五名，而大陸佔比最高的新能源汽車，台灣也有電動車的相關論文，而在台灣與大陸主要議題上也都有超過三成的論文在探討該議題。而美國則與台灣、大陸相當迥異，論文的題目、與扣除學科標籤後的關鍵字，比例分配都十分分散，論文作者的學門與碩博士的比例也都與台灣與大陸差異極大。
With the amendment of Taiwan`s Electricity Industry Law on January 11, 2017, Taiwan`s energy industry has taken a big step toward a free market. However, the monopoly of the energy industry in the past has made Taiwan relatively limited discussions on energy business models. This research hopes by comparing the differences in energy business models between Taiwan, China, and the United States. It can be used as a reference for follow-up Taiwan-related researchers. This research uses the literature analysis method to collect master and doctoral dissertations from the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, PQDT (ProQuest Dissertations & Theses), and China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database. A total of 250 works of literature are sorted out and carried out by bibliographic metrology. Analyze and summarize the integration to compare the differences in the development of energy business model research between the three countries, and try to interpret the analysis results and the sources of differences.The findings show that Taiwan`s and China`s master-doctoral dissertations are closer in the proportion of authors, master-doctoral, and similar in selecting topics. Taiwan`s most important energy technology service industry is in China. Paper titles and keyword rankings are also ranked in the top five. China`s highest proportion of new energy vehicles, Taiwan also has electric vehicles related papers, and more than 30% of the papers on significant topics in Taiwan and China are discussing this issue. The United States is quite different from Taiwan and China. The title of the paper and the keywords after deducting the subject label are distributed in a very scattered proportion. The ratio of the academic degree and the master`s degree of the paper author is also very different from that of Taiwan and China.參考文獻 董朝陽，趙俊華，文福拴（2014）。從智能電網到能源互聯網：基本概念與研究框架[J]。電力系統自動化， 38（15），1-11。張郁蔚（2012）。臺灣科學計量學研究之書目計量研究，《人文與社會科學簡訊。》，13，91-99。何光國 (1992)。 文獻計量學論著樣本之計量分析，圖書館學與資訊科學,，18(1)，48-82蔡明月， 劉瓊芳（2007）。1992-2005 資訊計量學研究及其發展演變，圖書與資訊學刊，61，42-56。林晏平（2019）。全球及我國風力發電市場回顧及產業趨勢，工研院產科國際所林晏平（2019）。美國離岸風電推動政策架構，工研院產科國際所Jeremy Rifkin著，張體偉譯（2013）。第三次工業革命—世界經濟將被顛覆，新能源與商務、政治、教育的全面革命. 經濟新潮社出版，台北。蔡岳勳 著（2013）。美國聯邦近年能源管理法規與這側發展研析，台灣經濟研究院出版，台北。林全能 著（2017）。全球能源轉型下之再生能源發展探討與借鏡，孫運璿學術基金會出版，台北。林全能（2015）。我國能源情勢與能源政策之發展，綠基會通訊張宏正（2007）。淺談台灣地區能源政策與推動能源教育。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。吳碧娥 （2016）。綠色科技也有創新商業模式：成功打造太陽能租賃的SolarCity，北美智權報，取自http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/IPNC_160501_0703.htm。李涵茵（2007）。能源服務產業研析，財團法人台灣綜合研究院杜松懷（2008）。普通高等教育「十一五」國家級規劃教材：電力市場（第3版），大陸電力出版社，北京。王有誠（2019）。平台商業模式開放邊界之初探，成功大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文 ， 1 - 141。洪永杰（2018）。，美英日三國電力市場制度型態結構及其運作方式，財團法人資訊工業策進會，取自https://km.twenergy.org.tw/KnowledgeFree/knowledge_more?id=3353。左峻德（2011）。發動台灣經濟新引擎－我國能源產業之利基與挑戰，台灣經濟研究會出版，台北。陳永龍，王啟州，游楨德（2019）。台化汽電共生廠清潔排放及PM2.5減量改善研究成果報告，中華民國環境工程學會。林智焜（2017）。，全球太陽能發電需求與展望，農業科技研究院產業發展中心，取自http://arget.atri.org.tw/uploads/ckfinder/files/17a82a64-7ef5-4ee5-8021-d22989858969.pdf。吳鎮國（2014）。淺談太陽能電池的原理與應用，臺大電機系科普系列，取自https://ee.ntu.edu.tw/upload/hischool/doc/2014.04.pdf。郎咸平（2008）。產業鏈的陰謀，東方出版社出版，北京。林上祚（2016）。「為什麼台化汽電共生被勒令停機？ 電力8成賣台電 彰化鄉親最氣這件事」，風傳媒，取自https://www.storm.mg/article/174265。Baden-Fuller C, Demil B, Lecoq X, MacMillan I. Editorial. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning. 43(2–3), 143–5.Ballon, P. (2007). Business modelling revisited: the configuration of control and value. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6-19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331554Bausch, A., & Schwenker, B. (2009).Handbook Utility Management. Springer-Verlag.Boehnke, J., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2007). Business Models for Distributed Energy Technologies-Evidence From German Cleantech Firms.. University of St. Gallen. PhD Thesis.Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027Burger, S., & Luke, M. (2017). Business models for distributed energy resources: A review and empirical analysis. Energy Policy. 109, 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.007Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE.(2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning . 43(2–3), 195–215.Duncan, R. (2010). Renewable energy and the utility: the next 20 years. Renewable Energy World. 2(3)，1-2.Engelken, M., Römer, B., Drescher, M., Welpe, I., & Picot, A. (2016). Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews. 60, 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.163Harvard Business Review (2001). Editorial. Harvard Business Review. 79, 124-125.Hollweck, T.& Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal Of Program Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108Klose, F., Kofluk, M., Lehrke, S., & Rubner, H. (2010). Toward A Distributed-Power World. Renewables And Smart Grids Will Reshape The Energy Sector. The Boston Consulting Group Report.Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for internet-based e-commerce: an anatomy. California Management Review. 42(4), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166053Nimmons, J., & Taylor, M. (2008). Utility solar business models. Emerging utility strategies & innovation. Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA) Publication: Washington, DC, USA.Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y.(2009). Business Model Generation. A Handbook For Visionaries, Game changers, And Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Osterwalder A.(2004). The Business Model Ontology: A Proposition In A Design Science Approach. Lausanne: University of Lausanne. Dissertation.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. (2005). Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems. 16, 1-2.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation And Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Porter M.(2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review. 86(1), 25-40.Porter, M.E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79, 62–78.Richter, M. (2012). Utilities’ business models for renewable energy: a review. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(5), 2483-2493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.072Shafer, S., Smith, H., & Linder, J. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons. 48(3), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014Starace F. (2008) The Utility Industry In 2020. Handbook Utility Management. Springer. 147-167.Teece DJ.(2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning . 43(2–3), 172–94.Zott C, Amit R, Massa L. (2010). The business model: theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research. IESE Working Paper. 3(4) , 1-43.Zott C, Amit R.(2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal . 29(1), 1–26.Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1674384 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
107363088資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363088 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 洪為璽<br>季延平 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Hung, Wei-Hsi<br>Chi，Yan-Ping en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林品瑄 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Pin-Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 林品瑄 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lin, Pin-Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2020 13:17:27 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Sep-2020 13:17:27 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2020 13:17:27 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107363088 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131949 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107363088 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 伴隨2017年1月11日台灣電業法修正，台灣能源產業邁向自由市場的轉型向前邁進了一大步，然而過往壟斷的能源產業使得台灣對能源商業模式的探討相對有限，故本研究希望透過比較台灣、大陸、美國在能源商業模式上的差異，以供後續台灣相關議題的研究者參考。本研究以文獻分析法，蒐集來自台灣碩博士論文加值系統、PQDT（ProQuest Dissertations & Theses）、大陸優秀碩士學位論文全文數據庫中的台灣、美國、大陸的碩博士論文，一共整理出250篇文獻並以書目計量學進行進行分析與歸納統整，以比較三國之間在能源商業模式研究上發展之差異，並嘗試詮釋分析結果與差異來源。研究發現結果顯示台灣與大陸的碩博士論文在作者學門的比例、碩博士比例上都更為接近，而在議題的選擇上相似度也較高，台灣最為重視的能源技術服務業在大陸的論文題目與關鍵字排名也都位居前五名，而大陸佔比最高的新能源汽車，台灣也有電動車的相關論文，而在台灣與大陸主要議題上也都有超過三成的論文在探討該議題。而美國則與台灣、大陸相當迥異，論文的題目、與扣除學科標籤後的關鍵字，比例分配都十分分散，論文作者的學門與碩博士的比例也都與台灣與大陸差異極大。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the amendment of Taiwan`s Electricity Industry Law on January 11, 2017, Taiwan`s energy industry has taken a big step toward a free market. However, the monopoly of the energy industry in the past has made Taiwan relatively limited discussions on energy business models. This research hopes by comparing the differences in energy business models between Taiwan, China, and the United States. It can be used as a reference for follow-up Taiwan-related researchers. This research uses the literature analysis method to collect master and doctoral dissertations from the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, PQDT (ProQuest Dissertations & Theses), and China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database. A total of 250 works of literature are sorted out and carried out by bibliographic metrology. Analyze and summarize the integration to compare the differences in the development of energy business model research between the three countries, and try to interpret the analysis results and the sources of differences.The findings show that Taiwan`s and China`s master-doctoral dissertations are closer in the proportion of authors, master-doctoral, and similar in selecting topics. Taiwan`s most important energy technology service industry is in China. Paper titles and keyword rankings are also ranked in the top five. China`s highest proportion of new energy vehicles, Taiwan also has electric vehicles related papers, and more than 30% of the papers on significant topics in Taiwan and China are discussing this issue. The United States is quite different from Taiwan and China. The title of the paper and the keywords after deducting the subject label are distributed in a very scattered proportion. The ratio of the academic degree and the master`s degree of the paper author is also very different from that of Taiwan and China. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 謝誌 i摘要 iiAbstract iii圖次 v表次 v第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究問題與目的 3第二章 文獻探討 5第一節 電力市場 5第二節 太陽能與風電 11第三節 台灣能源發展歷程與現況 16第四節 能源商業模式 21第三章 研究方法 29第一節 文獻分析法 29第二節 書目計量學 31第三節 研究流程 32第四章 研究結果 35第一節 台灣能源與商業模式相關碩博士論文分析 35第二節 美國能源與商業模式相關碩博士論文分析 40第三節 大陸能源與商業模式相關碩博士論文分析 52第四節 台灣、美國、大陸分析結果之比較 62第五章 結論與建議 69第一節 結論 69第二節 研究限制與未來研究之建議 70參考文獻 71 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3134081 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363088 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 能源 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 商業模式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文獻分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台灣 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大陸 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美國 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Energy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Business Model en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Literature Analysis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) China en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) United States en_US dc.title (題名) 能源商業模式相關研究之文獻分析－以碩博士論文為分析標的 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Literature Analysis of Business Model in Energy Sector: A Review of Dissertations and Theses en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 董朝陽，趙俊華，文福拴（2014）。從智能電網到能源互聯網：基本概念與研究框架[J]。電力系統自動化， 38（15），1-11。張郁蔚（2012）。臺灣科學計量學研究之書目計量研究，《人文與社會科學簡訊。》，13，91-99。何光國 (1992)。 文獻計量學論著樣本之計量分析，圖書館學與資訊科學,，18(1)，48-82蔡明月， 劉瓊芳（2007）。1992-2005 資訊計量學研究及其發展演變，圖書與資訊學刊，61，42-56。林晏平（2019）。全球及我國風力發電市場回顧及產業趨勢，工研院產科國際所林晏平（2019）。美國離岸風電推動政策架構，工研院產科國際所Jeremy Rifkin著，張體偉譯（2013）。第三次工業革命—世界經濟將被顛覆，新能源與商務、政治、教育的全面革命. 經濟新潮社出版，台北。蔡岳勳 著（2013）。美國聯邦近年能源管理法規與這側發展研析，台灣經濟研究院出版，台北。林全能 著（2017）。全球能源轉型下之再生能源發展探討與借鏡，孫運璿學術基金會出版，台北。林全能（2015）。我國能源情勢與能源政策之發展，綠基會通訊張宏正（2007）。淺談台灣地區能源政策與推動能源教育。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。吳碧娥 （2016）。綠色科技也有創新商業模式：成功打造太陽能租賃的SolarCity，北美智權報，取自http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/IPNC_160501_0703.htm。李涵茵（2007）。能源服務產業研析，財團法人台灣綜合研究院杜松懷（2008）。普通高等教育「十一五」國家級規劃教材：電力市場（第3版），大陸電力出版社，北京。王有誠（2019）。平台商業模式開放邊界之初探，成功大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文 ， 1 - 141。洪永杰（2018）。，美英日三國電力市場制度型態結構及其運作方式，財團法人資訊工業策進會，取自https://km.twenergy.org.tw/KnowledgeFree/knowledge_more?id=3353。左峻德（2011）。發動台灣經濟新引擎－我國能源產業之利基與挑戰，台灣經濟研究會出版，台北。陳永龍，王啟州，游楨德（2019）。台化汽電共生廠清潔排放及PM2.5減量改善研究成果報告，中華民國環境工程學會。林智焜（2017）。，全球太陽能發電需求與展望，農業科技研究院產業發展中心，取自http://arget.atri.org.tw/uploads/ckfinder/files/17a82a64-7ef5-4ee5-8021-d22989858969.pdf。吳鎮國（2014）。淺談太陽能電池的原理與應用，臺大電機系科普系列，取自https://ee.ntu.edu.tw/upload/hischool/doc/2014.04.pdf。郎咸平（2008）。產業鏈的陰謀，東方出版社出版，北京。林上祚（2016）。「為什麼台化汽電共生被勒令停機？ 電力8成賣台電 彰化鄉親最氣這件事」，風傳媒，取自https://www.storm.mg/article/174265。Baden-Fuller C, Demil B, Lecoq X, MacMillan I. Editorial. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning. 43(2–3), 143–5.Ballon, P. (2007). Business modelling revisited: the configuration of control and value. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6-19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331554Bausch, A., & Schwenker, B. (2009).Handbook Utility Management. Springer-Verlag.Boehnke, J., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2007). Business Models for Distributed Energy Technologies-Evidence From German Cleantech Firms.. University of St. Gallen. PhD Thesis.Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027Burger, S., & Luke, M. (2017). Business models for distributed energy resources: A review and empirical analysis. Energy Policy. 109, 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.007Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE.(2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning . 43(2–3), 195–215.Duncan, R. (2010). Renewable energy and the utility: the next 20 years. Renewable Energy World. 2(3)，1-2.Engelken, M., Römer, B., Drescher, M., Welpe, I., & Picot, A. (2016). Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews. 60, 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.163Harvard Business Review (2001). Editorial. Harvard Business Review. 79, 124-125.Hollweck, T.& Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal Of Program Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108Klose, F., Kofluk, M., Lehrke, S., & Rubner, H. (2010). Toward A Distributed-Power World. Renewables And Smart Grids Will Reshape The Energy Sector. The Boston Consulting Group Report.Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for internet-based e-commerce: an anatomy. California Management Review. 42(4), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166053Nimmons, J., & Taylor, M. (2008). Utility solar business models. Emerging utility strategies & innovation. Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA) Publication: Washington, DC, USA.Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y.(2009). Business Model Generation. A Handbook For Visionaries, Game changers, And Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Osterwalder A.(2004). The Business Model Ontology: A Proposition In A Design Science Approach. Lausanne: University of Lausanne. Dissertation.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. (2005). Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems. 16, 1-2.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation And Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Porter M.(2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review. 86(1), 25-40.Porter, M.E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79, 62–78.Richter, M. (2012). Utilities’ business models for renewable energy: a review. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(5), 2483-2493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.072Shafer, S., Smith, H., & Linder, J. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons. 48(3), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014Starace F. (2008) The Utility Industry In 2020. Handbook Utility Management. Springer. 147-167.Teece DJ.(2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning . 43(2–3), 172–94.Zott C, Amit R, Massa L. (2010). The business model: theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research. IESE Working Paper. 3(4) , 1-43.Zott C, Amit R.(2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal . 29(1), 1–26.Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1674384 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001531 en_US
