學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 國軍創新後勤政策形成研究-以服裝供售站政策為例
The Military Innovative Logistics Policy Formation － A Case Study of Uniform Supply Station Policy作者 方君豪
Fang, Jun-Hao貢獻者 黃東益
方君豪
Fang, Jun-Hao關鍵詞 國防組織
政策問題分析
議題建構
政策形成
Military organization
Policy problem analysis
Issue construction
Policy formulation日期 2020 上傳時間 4-Jan-2021 11:24:47 (UTC+8) 摘要 國軍服裝供售站政策」自104年11月起由國防部針對服裝政策興革為主軸，為改善過去國軍年度服裝原有補給政策的「定時」、「定項」及「定量」作法，所導致產生缺乏彈性、供未所需及品質不佳等長期實施上的問題。然而本項各級迫不急待推出的新興政策，卻時隔三年後才政策執行。如何能有效歸納政策問題分析與議題建構、政策形成模式及創新政策影響因素，以期在未來新興政策形成能有效協助聚焦，減少重工的時間浪擲，更可以提升工作管制的效率，此為實務上的研究目的；其次檢視涉及國防事務相關學術文章，多屬於政策可行性分析或是後續影響分析，未有類似發展歷程研究，是否有可持續精進或修正改善以為應用，此為學術上的研究目的。另外透過本次發展模式策頒的政策，是否實際解決原有問題而滿足官兵需求，則為本研究極欲探求要項。本研究以「國軍服裝供售站」政策形成為研究焦點，採用質性研究的深度訪法及次級資料分析法，透過對涉及本案問題研討及政策評估及具雷同經驗等，具備相當專業能力與經驗專家訪談，並分析歷次研討會議、政策配套調整規劃報告、立院議題報告及政策試行總評報告等資料，完整瞭解本項政策形成模式。研究結果發現，國防政策發展未具一定的模式，會隨問題的複雜性改變形成方式，而且整個發展與研討的過程中，不會有參與性治理的影子存在，且制定的過程，還需特別注意政治力量的介入。各個要點的整合與統整，才能加速國防組織新興政策形成的效率，完善政策執行的可能性。
The "military uniform supply station policy" has been developed by the Ministry of National Defense since November 2015 to improve the long-term logistics problem of lacking flexibility, efficiency, and quality, which is the previous military annual clothing supply policy of "fixed supply frequency," "fixed supply item" and " fixed supply quantity. " However, the above new policy, which was urgently requirement at all levels, was implemented after a delay of three years. Therefore, how to effectively summarize the influencing factors of policy problem analysis, topic construction, policy formation model, and innovative policy, effectively help focus, reduce time-wasting, and improve the efficiency of work control regarding emerging policy formation in the future practical research purpose. Secondly, based on academic articles related to national defense affairs, most are policy feasibility analysis or follow-up impact analysis. There is a rare issue about development history study, and whether there is sustainable refinement or modification for application, which is the academic research purpose. Besides, whether the policies issued through this development model can solve the original problems and meet the officers` and men`s needs is the critical issue that this study wants to explore.The research focuses on the "military uniform supply station policy" formulation process and adopts the in-depth interview of the qualitative research method and secondary data analysis. Furthermore, this study thoroughly analyzes the policy formulation model and the process by interviewing the professional experts of this case decision-makers and experienced experts and reviewing every data regarding policy seminars, policy planning reports, and legislative issues.The research results indicate that the development of national defense policy does not have a specific pattern, which will change with the issue`s complexity. Moreover, there is no shadow of participatory governance in the whole process of development and discussion, and special attention should be paid to the involvement of political forces in the formulation process. The integration of all critical points can accelerate the efficiency of emerging policies and improve the possibility of policy implementation.參考文獻 一、中文部份丘昌泰 (1995)。公共政策：當代政策科學理論之研究。臺北: 巨流圖書公司.丘昌泰 (2013)。公共政策：基礎篇 (五版)。臺北：巨流圖書公司.余致力 (2000)。民意與公共政策：表達方式的釐清與因果關係的探究。中國行政評論， 9(4)，81-110。余致力 (2002)。民意與公共政策：理論探討與實證研究。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。余致力 (2008)。公共政策。臺北：智勝文化。李衍儒、趙永茂 (2008)。公共政策棘手問題界定理論之研究：以我國觀光博弈產業政策與個案為例。行政暨政策學報，62，1-58。吳定 (2008)。公共政策。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。吳得源 (2006)。全球治理在公共政策理論發展之擴充。行政暨政策學報，42(1)，36。林水波、莊文忠 (1998a)。政策問題的建構與決策議程的啟動。立法院院聞，26(10)，19-39。林水波、莊文忠 (1998b)。政策論述與議程設定。立法院院聞，26(4)，9-29。張世賢、陳恆鈞 (1997)。公共政策：政府與市場的觀點。臺北：商鼎圖書公司。陳恆鈞(譯) (2001)。公共政策-演進研究途徑(Lester, J., & Stewart, J. 原著)。 臺北：學富文化。陳敦源、韓智先 (2000)。是誰告訴人民他們要什麼？ 媒體，民意與公共議程設定。研考雙月刊，24 (1)，19-31 。陳敦源、劉宜君、蕭乃沂、林昭吟 (2011)。政策利害關係人指認的理論與實務：以全民健保改革為例。國家與社會，10，1-65。許寶仁 (2008)。政府委外經營政策形成與執行作為之研究-以高速公路ETC案為例。國立臺灣師範大學研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。曾冠球、陳敦源與胡龍騰 (2009)。推展公民導向的電子化政府：願景或幻想？ 公共行政學報，33，1-43。黃東益、鍾道明 (2005)。高鐵財務融資爭議與議程設定之研究。逢甲人文社會學報，11，285-286。黃國敏 (2005)。政策民意與施政滿意度調查之探討：苗栗縣政府個案研究。政策研究學報，5，103-144。黃莉雲 (1994)。資料跨國流通法律問題之研究─相關理論與規範。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。詹中原 (2006)。公共政策問題建構過程中的公共性研究。公共管理學報，3(4)，12-21。潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究: 理論與應用。臺北：心理出版社.潘慧玲 (2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，111-143。鄭貞銘 (2001)。民意與民意測驗。臺北：三民書局。蘇義雄 (1992)。公共政策與民意調查。民意學術專刊，7，1–20。二、英文部份Ackoff, R. L., & Warfield, J. N. (1977). Redesigning the future, a systems approach to societal problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(10), 759-759.Brewer, G. D., & DeLeon, P. (1983). The foundations of policy analysis: Dorsey Press.Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. (2002). Managing policy reform: Concepts and tools for decision-makers in developing and transitioning countries: Kumarian Press.Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political research quarterly, 66(4), 883-895.Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(3), 495-522.Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030-1049.Duffy, M., & Goodgame, D. (1992). Marching in place: The status quo presidency of George Bush. NY: Simon and Schuster.Dunn, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis: Routledge.Dye, T. R. (2008). The Policymaking Process: Decision-Making Activities. Understanding Public Policy. 12a. ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 31-59.Easton, D. (1979). A Framework for Political Analysis, revised edition. In: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle: University of Chicago Press.Fox, W., & Meyer, I. H. (1995). Public administration dictionary: Juta and Company Ltd.Hanekom, S. X. (1987). Public policy: Framework and instrument for action: MacMillan South Africa.Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of management Journal, 42(5), 479-485.Hempel, D. J. (1977). Customer Satisfaction with the Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Measurement. The conceptualization of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, 7-8.Lindblom, C. E. (1993). The policy-making process / Charles E. Lindblom, Edward J. Woodhouse. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1(1), 40.Nimmo, D. D. (1974). Popular images of politics: a taxonomy: Prentice Hall.Parsons, D. W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis: Edward Elgar Pub.Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty.Readings, S., & Dunn, W. N. (2008). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. In (pp. 635-646): Pearson Prentice Hall.Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice. Policy studies journal, 21(1), 56-71.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition: Free Press.Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach: Westview Pr.Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda‐setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264-285.Starling, G. (1988). Strategies for policy making: Dorsey Press.Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104(2), 281-300.Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government. Public administration, 84(2), 311-335.Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management, 3-20.Woodward, F. I., Smith, T. M., & Emanuel, W. R. (1995). A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global biogeochemical cycles, 9(4), 471-490. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
107921202資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107921202 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃東益 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 方君豪 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Fang, Jun-Hao en_US dc.creator (作者) 方君豪 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Fang, Jun-Hao en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Jan-2021 11:24:47 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Jan-2021 11:24:47 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Jan-2021 11:24:47 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107921202 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133446 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107921202 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 國軍服裝供售站政策」自104年11月起由國防部針對服裝政策興革為主軸，為改善過去國軍年度服裝原有補給政策的「定時」、「定項」及「定量」作法，所導致產生缺乏彈性、供未所需及品質不佳等長期實施上的問題。然而本項各級迫不急待推出的新興政策，卻時隔三年後才政策執行。如何能有效歸納政策問題分析與議題建構、政策形成模式及創新政策影響因素，以期在未來新興政策形成能有效協助聚焦，減少重工的時間浪擲，更可以提升工作管制的效率，此為實務上的研究目的；其次檢視涉及國防事務相關學術文章，多屬於政策可行性分析或是後續影響分析，未有類似發展歷程研究，是否有可持續精進或修正改善以為應用，此為學術上的研究目的。另外透過本次發展模式策頒的政策，是否實際解決原有問題而滿足官兵需求，則為本研究極欲探求要項。本研究以「國軍服裝供售站」政策形成為研究焦點，採用質性研究的深度訪法及次級資料分析法，透過對涉及本案問題研討及政策評估及具雷同經驗等，具備相當專業能力與經驗專家訪談，並分析歷次研討會議、政策配套調整規劃報告、立院議題報告及政策試行總評報告等資料，完整瞭解本項政策形成模式。研究結果發現，國防政策發展未具一定的模式，會隨問題的複雜性改變形成方式，而且整個發展與研討的過程中，不會有參與性治理的影子存在，且制定的過程，還需特別注意政治力量的介入。各個要點的整合與統整，才能加速國防組織新興政策形成的效率，完善政策執行的可能性。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The "military uniform supply station policy" has been developed by the Ministry of National Defense since November 2015 to improve the long-term logistics problem of lacking flexibility, efficiency, and quality, which is the previous military annual clothing supply policy of "fixed supply frequency," "fixed supply item" and " fixed supply quantity. " However, the above new policy, which was urgently requirement at all levels, was implemented after a delay of three years. Therefore, how to effectively summarize the influencing factors of policy problem analysis, topic construction, policy formation model, and innovative policy, effectively help focus, reduce time-wasting, and improve the efficiency of work control regarding emerging policy formation in the future practical research purpose. Secondly, based on academic articles related to national defense affairs, most are policy feasibility analysis or follow-up impact analysis. There is a rare issue about development history study, and whether there is sustainable refinement or modification for application, which is the academic research purpose. Besides, whether the policies issued through this development model can solve the original problems and meet the officers` and men`s needs is the critical issue that this study wants to explore.The research focuses on the "military uniform supply station policy" formulation process and adopts the in-depth interview of the qualitative research method and secondary data analysis. Furthermore, this study thoroughly analyzes the policy formulation model and the process by interviewing the professional experts of this case decision-makers and experienced experts and reviewing every data regarding policy seminars, policy planning reports, and legislative issues.The research results indicate that the development of national defense policy does not have a specific pattern, which will change with the issue`s complexity. Moreover, there is no shadow of participatory governance in the whole process of development and discussion, and special attention should be paid to the involvement of political forces in the formulation process. The integration of all critical points can accelerate the efficiency of emerging policies and improve the possibility of policy implementation. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭 i摘要 iiAbstract iii目次 iv表目次 v圖目次 vi第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的與問題 5第二章 文獻回顧 7第一節 政策問題分析與議題架構 7第二節 公共政策形成模式 13第三節 創新政策影響因素 17第三章 研究設計與實施 26第一節 研究方法 26第二節 研究信實度 33第三節 研究倫理 34第四章 國軍服裝供售站政策探討 36第一節 政策問題的界定與議題建構 36第二節 政策形成的影響因素 42第三節 後勤政策發展程序與模型 53第四節 服裝供售站推動現況與驗證 62第五章 結論 66第一節 研究發現與討論 66第二節 實務建議 70第三節 研究限制與後續研究方向 72附件 研究倫理同意書 75參考文獻 76 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2859399 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107921202 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國防組織 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策問題分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 議題建構 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策形成 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Military organization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy problem analysis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Issue construction en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy formulation en_US dc.title (題名) 國軍創新後勤政策形成研究-以服裝供售站政策為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Military Innovative Logistics Policy Formation － A Case Study of Uniform Supply Station Policy en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份丘昌泰 (1995)。公共政策：當代政策科學理論之研究。臺北: 巨流圖書公司.丘昌泰 (2013)。公共政策：基礎篇 (五版)。臺北：巨流圖書公司.余致力 (2000)。民意與公共政策：表達方式的釐清與因果關係的探究。中國行政評論， 9(4)，81-110。余致力 (2002)。民意與公共政策：理論探討與實證研究。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。余致力 (2008)。公共政策。臺北：智勝文化。李衍儒、趙永茂 (2008)。公共政策棘手問題界定理論之研究：以我國觀光博弈產業政策與個案為例。行政暨政策學報，62，1-58。吳定 (2008)。公共政策。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。吳得源 (2006)。全球治理在公共政策理論發展之擴充。行政暨政策學報，42(1)，36。林水波、莊文忠 (1998a)。政策問題的建構與決策議程的啟動。立法院院聞，26(10)，19-39。林水波、莊文忠 (1998b)。政策論述與議程設定。立法院院聞，26(4)，9-29。張世賢、陳恆鈞 (1997)。公共政策：政府與市場的觀點。臺北：商鼎圖書公司。陳恆鈞(譯) (2001)。公共政策-演進研究途徑(Lester, J., & Stewart, J. 原著)。 臺北：學富文化。陳敦源、韓智先 (2000)。是誰告訴人民他們要什麼？ 媒體，民意與公共議程設定。研考雙月刊，24 (1)，19-31 。陳敦源、劉宜君、蕭乃沂、林昭吟 (2011)。政策利害關係人指認的理論與實務：以全民健保改革為例。國家與社會，10，1-65。許寶仁 (2008)。政府委外經營政策形成與執行作為之研究-以高速公路ETC案為例。國立臺灣師範大學研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。曾冠球、陳敦源與胡龍騰 (2009)。推展公民導向的電子化政府：願景或幻想？ 公共行政學報，33，1-43。黃東益、鍾道明 (2005)。高鐵財務融資爭議與議程設定之研究。逢甲人文社會學報，11，285-286。黃國敏 (2005)。政策民意與施政滿意度調查之探討：苗栗縣政府個案研究。政策研究學報，5，103-144。黃莉雲 (1994)。資料跨國流通法律問題之研究─相關理論與規範。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。詹中原 (2006)。公共政策問題建構過程中的公共性研究。公共管理學報，3(4)，12-21。潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究: 理論與應用。臺北：心理出版社.潘慧玲 (2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，111-143。鄭貞銘 (2001)。民意與民意測驗。臺北：三民書局。蘇義雄 (1992)。公共政策與民意調查。民意學術專刊，7，1–20。二、英文部份Ackoff, R. L., & Warfield, J. N. (1977). Redesigning the future, a systems approach to societal problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(10), 759-759.Brewer, G. D., & DeLeon, P. (1983). The foundations of policy analysis: Dorsey Press.Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. (2002). Managing policy reform: Concepts and tools for decision-makers in developing and transitioning countries: Kumarian Press.Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political research quarterly, 66(4), 883-895.Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(3), 495-522.Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030-1049.Duffy, M., & Goodgame, D. (1992). Marching in place: The status quo presidency of George Bush. NY: Simon and Schuster.Dunn, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis: Routledge.Dye, T. R. (2008). The Policymaking Process: Decision-Making Activities. Understanding Public Policy. 12a. ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 31-59.Easton, D. (1979). A Framework for Political Analysis, revised edition. In: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle: University of Chicago Press.Fox, W., & Meyer, I. H. (1995). Public administration dictionary: Juta and Company Ltd.Hanekom, S. X. (1987). Public policy: Framework and instrument for action: MacMillan South Africa.Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of management Journal, 42(5), 479-485.Hempel, D. J. (1977). Customer Satisfaction with the Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Measurement. The conceptualization of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, 7-8.Lindblom, C. E. (1993). The policy-making process / Charles E. Lindblom, Edward J. Woodhouse. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1(1), 40.Nimmo, D. D. (1974). Popular images of politics: a taxonomy: Prentice Hall.Parsons, D. W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis: Edward Elgar Pub.Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty.Readings, S., & Dunn, W. N. (2008). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. In (pp. 635-646): Pearson Prentice Hall.Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice. Policy studies journal, 21(1), 56-71.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition: Free Press.Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach: Westview Pr.Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda‐setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264-285.Starling, G. (1988). Strategies for policy making: Dorsey Press.Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104(2), 281-300.Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government. Public administration, 84(2), 311-335.Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management, 3-20.Woodward, F. I., Smith, T. M., & Emanuel, W. R. (1995). A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global biogeochemical cycles, 9(4), 471-490. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001836 en_US
