學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 從多層次角度分析同儕協助應用於閱讀學習之合作增強效應與合作抑止效應
Exploring the Effects of Collaborative Facilitation and Inhibition in a Peer-Assisted Collaborative Reading Environment Based on Multilevel Analysis
作者 陳勇汀
Chen, Yung-Ting
貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen, Chih-Ming
陳勇汀
Chen, Yung-Ting
關鍵詞 同儕協助閱讀學習
合作記憶典範
子群組探勘
模糊特殊模型探勘
閱讀行為事件分析
Peer-assisted collaborative reading
Collaborative memory paradigm
Subgroup discovery
Fuzzy exceptional model Mining
Reading behavior analysis
日期 2021
摘要 研究背景:現今閱讀學習研究中,能夠應用於多人異質性教學環境的同儕協助合作閱讀教學法已蔚為主流。儘管許多研究證實了同儕協助能為閱讀學習帶來合作增強效應,但也有其他研究指出,包含同儕協助在內的合作學習亦可能帶來合作抑止效應。本研究主張應深入分析可能影響同儕協助的各種研究變項。 研究目的:本研究的目的在於探討同儕協助應用於閱讀學習所帶來的合作增強效應和合作抑止效應。接著進一步發掘造成合作增強效應與合作抑止效應的相關變項之規則,並從學習者的閱讀行為找出支持規則的相關證據。 研究場域:從兩所以常態編班組成的國小三年級班級中,各選擇兩個班級。總共四個班級進行教學實驗。 研究對象:合計總共有87位國小學習者參與教學實驗。 研究方法:學習者被分為22個小組。一半被安排到具有同儕協助之閱讀學習的實驗組、另一半則是沒有同儕協助之閱讀學習的控制組。實驗組使用重點主旨策略和著重於識字解碼的認知監控策略來閱讀文本,並能看到其他同儕使用閱讀理解策略的方式。實驗組學習者被鼓勵去比較同儕使用閱讀理解策略的方式與自己的異同,並給予其他同儕閱讀理解策略的使用建議,或對認同的使用方式表示喜愛。控制組的閱讀活動則跟實驗組相同,但控制組被安排為僅有個人的專注閱讀,並沒有同儕介入。 研究設計:本研究採用準實驗研究法。 資料蒐集與分析:本研究蒐集的學習者資料,包括了根據預測和回想計算的閱讀學習成效、反映學習者特質的閱讀理解能力、閱讀態度、合作學習風格,以及基於閱讀行為記錄的閱讀策略行為、合作機制因素和同儕協助因素。經過以學習者小組為單位的統整後,本研究隨後進行整體、宏觀與微觀三個層次的影響閱讀理解成效因素分析。整體層次的分析是使用的是共變數分析,用以比較實驗組與控制組在閱讀學習成效上的差異;宏觀層次的分析是利用模糊特殊模型探勘,用來發掘各個研究變項造成合作增強效應和合作抑止效應的規則;微觀層次的分析是透過行為事件分析,而分析結果能夠作為支持宏觀層次探勘規則的相關證據。 研究結果:研究結果顯示同儕協助對於閱讀學習造成了微弱的合作增強效應,但未達顯著。本研究深入分析各個變項後,發現造成合作增強效應的規則來自於重點主旨策略的使用次數,以及部分合作機制因素與同儕協助因素的影響。其中,重點主旨策略能夠發揮合作增強效應的原因,可能是因為學習者會利用此策略相互討論。另一方面,造成合作抑止效應的規則包括了認知監控策略的使用、閱讀態度較高與偏向合作學習風格。學習者在使用認知監控策略時,可能因為過於仰賴同儕並缺乏深入的互動,導致了合作抑止效應的發生。 結論:本研究發現同儕協助應用於閱讀學習中帶來了些微的合作增強效應,並歸納了造成合作增強效應與合作抑止效應的各別規則,以及揭示兩種閱讀理解策略所造成的影響。後續在規劃閱讀活動時應將本研究發掘的規則納入考量,以發揮同儕協助的最大效益。未來研究可考慮運用模糊特殊模型探勘來分析其他閱讀理解策略的影響,或是基於本研究的結果發展閱讀輔助機制。
Background: Peer-assisted collaborative reading strategy instruction, which can be applied to heterogeneous classroom environments, is the mainstream among studies of reading comprehension nowadays. While many studies have proven that peer assistance can bring collaborative facilitation effects in reading-learning; some studies have found that collaborative learning methods, peer assistance included, may lead to collaborative inhibition effects. As a result, this research aims at proposing a deep analysis of research variables that may affect peer assistance. Purpose: This research aims to explore the effects of collaborative facilitation and inhibition in peer-assisted instruction on reading comprehension. Moreover, the rules of the variables relating to the effects of collaborative facilitation and inhibition are explored, the relating evidence that supported the rules are discovered through the learners’ reading behavior events. Setting: A total of 4 Grade 3 classes were recruited elementary schools with normal class grouping, 2 classes in each school. Participants: The participants consisted of 87 Grade 3 elementary school students. Intervention: The learners were divided into 22 groups based on the group formulation scheme determined by this research. Half of the participants were assigned to the experimental group with peer-assisted instruction for promoting their reading comprehension while the other half were assigned to the control group without the peer-assisted. Two reading comprehension strategies, the get-the-gist strategy and the monitoring strategy, which focused on decoding skills, were used by the experimental group. The group members in the experimental group could look at the reading comprehension strategies used by their peers. Learners from the experimental group were encouraged to compare the differences in the use of reading comprehension strategies with their peers. They could give suggestions to the peers regarding the use of reading comprehension strategies, and they could express their likes toward preferred strategies. The control group adopted similar reading tasks to the experimental group, but without any peer interactions. Research Design: This research adopted quasi-experiment research method. Data Collection and Analysis: The learner data collected in this research include the following: reading performances assessed from the predictions and the recalls, reading comprehension abilities that reflected the characteristics of the learners, reading attitudes, collaborative/competitive learning styles, usages of reading strategies based on reading behavior pattern logs, collaborative mechanisms, and peer-assisted behaviors. Overall level, macro-level, and micro-level analyses were conducted in this research after the compilation of data in units of the learners` groups. ANCOVA was is used to compare the differences in reading performances between the experimental group and the control group in the overall level analysis. Fuzzy exceptional model mining was used to explore the rules of happening collaborative facilitation and inhibition behind the research variables in the macro-level analysis. The event-based analysis was used in a micro-level analysis. The analysis results can be used as supporting evidence for the explored rules at the macro-level analysis. Results: The analytical results show that peer assistance has resulted in collaborative facilitation effects to some degree but does not reach statistical significance. After analyzing all variables, it was discovered that the rules of collaborative facilitation effects are based on the counts of get-the-gist strategy, parts of the collaborative mechanisms, and the influences of peer assistance behaviors. The reason for the get-the-gist strategy to result in the collaborative facilitation effect might be that the learners would discuss with each other using the strategy. On the other hand, the rules about the collaborative inhibition effects include the use of monitoring/clarifying strategy, positive attitudes toward reading, and tendency towards collaborative learning style. When monitoring/clarifying strategy was is used by the learners in the experimental group, the effect of collaborative inhibition might come from the over depending on their peers and the lack of deep interactions. Conclusions: The research findings of this research include are that the application of peer assistance in promoting the learners’ reading comprehension can lead to collaborative facilitation effects to some degree. Moreover, the rules related to the effects on collaborative facilitation and collaborative inhibition are summarized as well as the effects of the two reading comprehension strategies are investigated. This research suggests that the rules affecting collaborative facilitation and collaborative inhibition discovered in this research should be put into consideration when designing reading activities to facilitate the benefits of peer assistance. This research also suggests that fuzzy exceptional model mining analysis could be used as an effective tool in future studies to explore the impacts of other reading comprehension strategies on learners. Finally, developing reading assistance mechanisms based on the findings of this research may be considered as our future work.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
100155503
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100155503
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih-Mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳勇汀zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Yung-Tingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳勇汀zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Yung-Tingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2021en_US
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0100155503en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135334-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100155503zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 研究背景:現今閱讀學習研究中,能夠應用於多人異質性教學環境的同儕協助合作閱讀教學法已蔚為主流。儘管許多研究證實了同儕協助能為閱讀學習帶來合作增強效應,但也有其他研究指出,包含同儕協助在內的合作學習亦可能帶來合作抑止效應。本研究主張應深入分析可能影響同儕協助的各種研究變項。 研究目的:本研究的目的在於探討同儕協助應用於閱讀學習所帶來的合作增強效應和合作抑止效應。接著進一步發掘造成合作增強效應與合作抑止效應的相關變項之規則,並從學習者的閱讀行為找出支持規則的相關證據。 研究場域:從兩所以常態編班組成的國小三年級班級中,各選擇兩個班級。總共四個班級進行教學實驗。 研究對象:合計總共有87位國小學習者參與教學實驗。 研究方法:學習者被分為22個小組。一半被安排到具有同儕協助之閱讀學習的實驗組、另一半則是沒有同儕協助之閱讀學習的控制組。實驗組使用重點主旨策略和著重於識字解碼的認知監控策略來閱讀文本,並能看到其他同儕使用閱讀理解策略的方式。實驗組學習者被鼓勵去比較同儕使用閱讀理解策略的方式與自己的異同,並給予其他同儕閱讀理解策略的使用建議,或對認同的使用方式表示喜愛。控制組的閱讀活動則跟實驗組相同,但控制組被安排為僅有個人的專注閱讀,並沒有同儕介入。 研究設計:本研究採用準實驗研究法。 資料蒐集與分析:本研究蒐集的學習者資料,包括了根據預測和回想計算的閱讀學習成效、反映學習者特質的閱讀理解能力、閱讀態度、合作學習風格,以及基於閱讀行為記錄的閱讀策略行為、合作機制因素和同儕協助因素。經過以學習者小組為單位的統整後,本研究隨後進行整體、宏觀與微觀三個層次的影響閱讀理解成效因素分析。整體層次的分析是使用的是共變數分析,用以比較實驗組與控制組在閱讀學習成效上的差異;宏觀層次的分析是利用模糊特殊模型探勘,用來發掘各個研究變項造成合作增強效應和合作抑止效應的規則;微觀層次的分析是透過行為事件分析,而分析結果能夠作為支持宏觀層次探勘規則的相關證據。 研究結果:研究結果顯示同儕協助對於閱讀學習造成了微弱的合作增強效應,但未達顯著。本研究深入分析各個變項後,發現造成合作增強效應的規則來自於重點主旨策略的使用次數,以及部分合作機制因素與同儕協助因素的影響。其中,重點主旨策略能夠發揮合作增強效應的原因,可能是因為學習者會利用此策略相互討論。另一方面,造成合作抑止效應的規則包括了認知監控策略的使用、閱讀態度較高與偏向合作學習風格。學習者在使用認知監控策略時,可能因為過於仰賴同儕並缺乏深入的互動,導致了合作抑止效應的發生。 結論:本研究發現同儕協助應用於閱讀學習中帶來了些微的合作增強效應,並歸納了造成合作增強效應與合作抑止效應的各別規則,以及揭示兩種閱讀理解策略所造成的影響。後續在規劃閱讀活動時應將本研究發掘的規則納入考量,以發揮同儕協助的最大效益。未來研究可考慮運用模糊特殊模型探勘來分析其他閱讀理解策略的影響,或是基於本研究的結果發展閱讀輔助機制。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Background: Peer-assisted collaborative reading strategy instruction, which can be applied to heterogeneous classroom environments, is the mainstream among studies of reading comprehension nowadays. While many studies have proven that peer assistance can bring collaborative facilitation effects in reading-learning; some studies have found that collaborative learning methods, peer assistance included, may lead to collaborative inhibition effects. As a result, this research aims at proposing a deep analysis of research variables that may affect peer assistance. Purpose: This research aims to explore the effects of collaborative facilitation and inhibition in peer-assisted instruction on reading comprehension. Moreover, the rules of the variables relating to the effects of collaborative facilitation and inhibition are explored, the relating evidence that supported the rules are discovered through the learners’ reading behavior events. Setting: A total of 4 Grade 3 classes were recruited elementary schools with normal class grouping, 2 classes in each school. Participants: The participants consisted of 87 Grade 3 elementary school students. Intervention: The learners were divided into 22 groups based on the group formulation scheme determined by this research. Half of the participants were assigned to the experimental group with peer-assisted instruction for promoting their reading comprehension while the other half were assigned to the control group without the peer-assisted. Two reading comprehension strategies, the get-the-gist strategy and the monitoring strategy, which focused on decoding skills, were used by the experimental group. The group members in the experimental group could look at the reading comprehension strategies used by their peers. Learners from the experimental group were encouraged to compare the differences in the use of reading comprehension strategies with their peers. They could give suggestions to the peers regarding the use of reading comprehension strategies, and they could express their likes toward preferred strategies. The control group adopted similar reading tasks to the experimental group, but without any peer interactions. Research Design: This research adopted quasi-experiment research method. Data Collection and Analysis: The learner data collected in this research include the following: reading performances assessed from the predictions and the recalls, reading comprehension abilities that reflected the characteristics of the learners, reading attitudes, collaborative/competitive learning styles, usages of reading strategies based on reading behavior pattern logs, collaborative mechanisms, and peer-assisted behaviors. Overall level, macro-level, and micro-level analyses were conducted in this research after the compilation of data in units of the learners` groups. ANCOVA was is used to compare the differences in reading performances between the experimental group and the control group in the overall level analysis. Fuzzy exceptional model mining was used to explore the rules of happening collaborative facilitation and inhibition behind the research variables in the macro-level analysis. The event-based analysis was used in a micro-level analysis. The analysis results can be used as supporting evidence for the explored rules at the macro-level analysis. Results: The analytical results show that peer assistance has resulted in collaborative facilitation effects to some degree but does not reach statistical significance. After analyzing all variables, it was discovered that the rules of collaborative facilitation effects are based on the counts of get-the-gist strategy, parts of the collaborative mechanisms, and the influences of peer assistance behaviors. The reason for the get-the-gist strategy to result in the collaborative facilitation effect might be that the learners would discuss with each other using the strategy. On the other hand, the rules about the collaborative inhibition effects include the use of monitoring/clarifying strategy, positive attitudes toward reading, and tendency towards collaborative learning style. When monitoring/clarifying strategy was is used by the learners in the experimental group, the effect of collaborative inhibition might come from the over depending on their peers and the lack of deep interactions. Conclusions: The research findings of this research include are that the application of peer assistance in promoting the learners’ reading comprehension can lead to collaborative facilitation effects to some degree. Moreover, the rules related to the effects on collaborative facilitation and collaborative inhibition are summarized as well as the effects of the two reading comprehension strategies are investigated. This research suggests that the rules affecting collaborative facilitation and collaborative inhibition discovered in this research should be put into consideration when designing reading activities to facilitate the benefits of peer assistance. This research also suggests that fuzzy exceptional model mining analysis could be used as an effective tool in future studies to explore the impacts of other reading comprehension strategies on learners. Finally, developing reading assistance mechanisms based on the findings of this research may be considered as our future work.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 i 目次 vii 表次 xi 圖次 xv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 7 第三節 研究問題 8 第四節 名詞解釋 9 第二章 文獻探討 15 第一節 閱讀理解之意涵 15 第二節 同儕協助合作閱讀教學 42 第三節 同儕協助合作閱讀教學中影響閱讀學習的因素 54 第四節 教育資料探勘之子群組探勘 72 第五節 行為事件分析 102 第三章 數位同儕協助合作閱讀學習環境 111 第一節 支援閱讀活動流程引導 112 第二節 支援閱讀理解策略的標註功能 123 第三節 在閱讀學習中提供同儕協助 131 第四節 支援閱讀學習歷程的記錄 138 第五節 設備兼容性與教材整合能力 147 第六節 同儕協助實驗變項的控制能力 148 第四章 模糊特殊模型探勘 151 第一節 模糊特殊模型探勘的目標概念 151 第二節 模糊特殊模型探勘的分析流程 152 第三節 共變數分析模型目標概念之品質評估指標與中介影響方向 168 第四節 模糊特殊模型探勘與其他子群組探勘研究之差異 182 小結 183 第五章 研究方法 185 第一節 研究架構 185 第二節 研究對象 187 第三節 閱讀學習實驗流程 188 第四節 資料蒐集與處理 199 第五節 資料分析 211 第六節 研究工具 217 第六章 研究結果 229 第一節 研究對象概述 229 第二節 組間閱讀學習成效分析 231 第三節 隱性影響描述變項之共變數分析模型目標概念模糊特殊模型探勘 240 第四節 顯性影響描述變項之單類別類型目標概念模糊特殊模型探勘 252 第五節 學習者個人行為事件記錄之行為事件分析 260 第六節 討論 279 第七章 研究結論 289 第一節 結論 289 第二節 研究限制 294 第三節 教學建議 296 第四節 未來研究方向 297 參考文獻 305 附錄一 研究知情同意書A版 349 附錄二 研究知情同意書B版 355 附錄三 閱讀態度量表 361 附錄四 合作學習風格量表 363 附錄五 數位閱讀學習活動可用性量表 365 附錄六 自由預測與回憶命題編碼表 369zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100155503en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 同儕協助閱讀學習zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合作記憶典範zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 子群組探勘zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 模糊特殊模型探勘zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀行為事件分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Peer-assisted collaborative readingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Collaborative memory paradigmen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Subgroup discoveryen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Fuzzy exceptional model Miningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Reading behavior analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 從多層次角度分析同儕協助應用於閱讀學習之合作增強效應與合作抑止效應zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Exploring the Effects of Collaborative Facilitation and Inhibition in a Peer-Assisted Collaborative Reading Environment Based on Multilevel Analysisen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesis-