學術產出-Periodical Articles
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 Achieving structured knowledge management with a novel online group decision support system 作者 龐頌全
Pang, Songquan貢獻者 科博學三 關鍵詞 knowledge management ; Ba ; socialization ; externalization ; combination ; internalization (SECI) model ; group decision support system ; TeamSpirit ; knowledge adoption 日期 2020-11 上傳時間 17-Jun-2021 15:43:07 (UTC+8) 摘要 Knowledge management (KM) is a complicated process that involves socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization and requires close collaboration among the people involved. Although Nonaka proposed the SECI (Socialization, Externalization, Combination, Internalization) model and the concept of Ba, which provides a process-oriented view of knowledge creation and transfer, practicing it is rather ad hoc. COVID-19 has provided a chance for practitioners to find a new method for KM. In this study, we adapted a group problem-solving system called TeamSpirit and structured it as a Ba for the SECI model. We then compared TeamSpirit with two other implementations of Ba, email and face-to-face communication, to evaluate their effects on knowledge externalization, knowledge combination, and knowledge internalization. Then, we evaluated whether these knowledge-conversion processes could improve knowledge acquisition and intention to share knowledge. A 3 × 2 mixed factorial design experiment was conducted. The results show that (a) TeamSpirit was better than the others, and face-to-face was better than email for each of the three knowledge conversion processes (externalization, combination, and internalization) and (b) the better the team’s knowledge conversion process lead, the stronger its knowledge acquisition and knowledge-sharing intention. 關聯 Information Development 資料類型 article DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920969842 dc.contributor 科博學三 dc.creator (作者) 龐頌全 dc.creator (作者) Pang, Songquan dc.date (日期) 2020-11 dc.date.accessioned 17-Jun-2021 15:43:07 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 17-Jun-2021 15:43:07 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Jun-2021 15:43:07 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135851 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) Knowledge management (KM) is a complicated process that involves socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization and requires close collaboration among the people involved. Although Nonaka proposed the SECI (Socialization, Externalization, Combination, Internalization) model and the concept of Ba, which provides a process-oriented view of knowledge creation and transfer, practicing it is rather ad hoc. COVID-19 has provided a chance for practitioners to find a new method for KM. In this study, we adapted a group problem-solving system called TeamSpirit and structured it as a Ba for the SECI model. We then compared TeamSpirit with two other implementations of Ba, email and face-to-face communication, to evaluate their effects on knowledge externalization, knowledge combination, and knowledge internalization. Then, we evaluated whether these knowledge-conversion processes could improve knowledge acquisition and intention to share knowledge. A 3 × 2 mixed factorial design experiment was conducted. The results show that (a) TeamSpirit was better than the others, and face-to-face was better than email for each of the three knowledge conversion processes (externalization, combination, and internalization) and (b) the better the team’s knowledge conversion process lead, the stronger its knowledge acquisition and knowledge-sharing intention. dc.format.extent 485156 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.relation (關聯) Information Development dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge management ; Ba ; socialization ; externalization ; combination ; internalization (SECI) model ; group decision support system ; TeamSpirit ; knowledge adoption dc.title (題名) Achieving structured knowledge management with a novel online group decision support system dc.type (資料類型) article dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1177/0266666920969842 dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920969842
