| dc.contributor.advisor | 戚務君 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 黃鼎皓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Huang, Ting-Hao | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃鼎皓 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Huang, Ting-Hao | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2021 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 1-Jul-2021 17:01:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 1-Jul-2021 17:01:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-Jul-2021 17:01:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0108353027 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135917 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 會計學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 108353027 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 國際會計準則理事會（IASB）於民國103年發布IFRS 9「金融工具」（以下簡稱IFRS 9），重新規定金融資產之分類、衡量與減損方式。而我國於民國107年正式適用此號公報，影響範圍涵蓋許多資產負債表及綜合損益表之重要項目，對於107年財務報告影響甚鉅，金融業尤為首當其衝之產業之一，眾多影響中勢必包括品質特性之變化，此亦為過去文獻所著墨之焦點，尤其對於金融工具之分類與衡量，IFRS 9採用全新之規定：「金融工具之現金流量是否單純為本金與利息之回收（SPPI test）」，使企業因更嚴格之會計準則規範，迫使過去將金融工具分類為「按攤銷後成本衡量之金融工具」之比例降低，改以「透過其他綜合損益按公允價值衡量」，在此兩類金融工具下之後續會計處理可說大相逕庭，亦可說明並呼應前述「此公報對財務報表之品質特性有重大影響」之說法。因此，本研究針對我國銀行業在採用IFRS 9後，進行以下三問題之探討：（1）IFRS 9是否能提升財務報表之可比較性，及（2）依照IFRS 7及IFRS 13揭露於附註之「公允價值層級」資訊，其可比較性與採用新公報之關聯又為何，及（3）此號公報下，以損益或綜合損益衡量之可比性，何者較為攸關。本研究參考De Franco et al.（2011）衡量可比性之方式，選取我國上市（櫃）銀行（含持有銀行子公司之金融控股公司）進行研究。研究結果顯示，在採用IFRS 9之後，整體而言，若以淨利衡量，未發現財務報表可比性有顯著差異；若以綜合損益衡量，則財務報表可比性顯著下降；另外，在採用IFRS 9之前，第一、三層級公允價值之金融工具持有數與可比性無關，但在採用IFRS 9後，發現以綜合損益衡量之可比性呈顯著下降。整體而言，採用綜合損益衡量之可比性較能得出顯著之結果；而採用IFRS 9後對第一層級公允價值可比性有正向關聯之「趨勢」；對第三層級公允價值可比性，以淨利衡量有負向關聯之「趨勢」，以綜合損益衡量有負向關聯之「結果」。期此研究結果能作為往後金融工具相關準則再修改之參考，亦提供會計師以及相關利害關係人執行查核工作或使用財務報表之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments" (hereinafter referred to as IFRS 9) in 2014, re-regulating the classification, measurement and impairment methods of financial assets, which was officially applied this bulletin in 2018. The scope of influence covers many important items in the balance sheet and comprehensive income statement. It has a huge impact on the financial report in 107. The financial industry is particularly one of the industries that bear the brunt of it. The many influences are bound to include the changes in quality characteristics, which have also been the focus of the literature in the past. Especially for the classification and measurement of financial instruments, IFRS 9 adopts a new requirement: "Whether the cash flow of financial instruments is simply the recovery of principal and interest (SPPI test)". As a result of stricter accounting standards and regulations, companies have forced a reduction in the proportion of financial instruments classified as "financial instruments measured at amortized cost" and changed to "measured at fair value through other comprehensive gains and losses." Subsequent accounting treatments under similar financial instruments can be said to be quite different, and it can also explain and echo the aforementioned statement that "this communiqué has a significant impact on the quality of financial statements."This thesis focuses on the following three issues after the adoption of IFRS 9 in Taiwan’s banking industry: (1) Whether IFRS 9 can improve the comparability of financial statements, and (2) According to IFRS 7 and IFRS 13, whether the “fair value level” information disclosed in notes has a connection with comparability? (3) Under this bulletin, whether the comparability measured by net income or comprehensive income is more relevant.This thesis refers to the method of measuring comparability by De Franco et al. (2011), and selects listed (counter) banks in Taiwan (including financial holding companies that hold bank subsidiaries) for research. The research results show that after the adoption of IFRS 9, supposed the comparability is measured by net income, no significant difference have been found in the comparability of financial statements, while the comparability is measured by comprehensive income, the comparability of financial statements has decreased significantly. In addition, before the adoption of IFRS 9, the number of financial instruments that enterprises held for the first and third levels of fair value has nothing to do with comparability, but after adding the cross-multiplication item with IFRS 9, it is found that the coefficient measured by "comprehensive income" decreased significantly. As a whole, the use of "comprehensive income" to measure comparability can yield more significant results; the use of IFRS 9 has a "trend" that cause a positive impact on the level 1 fair value comparability, the one in level 3, however, when "net income" is involved, chances are it has a "trend" with negative influence; as it is replaced with "comprehensive income", it comes to the "result" with negative influence.I expect that the results of this research can be used as a reference for future revisions of relevant financial instrument standards, and also for accountants and related stakeholders to perform audit work or use financial statements. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝詞 i中文摘要 iiAbstract iii目錄 v表目錄 vi第壹章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 3第三節 研究架構 5第貳章 文獻探討與假說發展 6第一節 IFRS 9相關文獻 6第一節 可比性、IFRS與財務報表品質相關文獻 8第參章 研究設計 15第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 15第二節 實證模型與變數定義 16第肆章 實證結果 21第一節 敘述性統計 21第二節 相關性分析 24第三節 迴歸分析 27第伍章 研究結論、研究限制與未來研究建議 34第一節 研究結論 34第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 35參考文獻 36 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 1323490 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353027 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | IFRS 9 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 可比性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | IFRS 13 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公允價值層級 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | IFRS 9 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Comparability | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | IFRS 13 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Fair value hierarchy | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 我國適用IFRS 9後財務報表可比較性變化之探討—以銀行業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Discussion on the Comparability Changes of Financial Statements after the Adoption of IFRS 9 —The Case for Banking Industry in Taiwan | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文參考文獻王聖雄，2017，導入國際財務報導準則對財務報表可比較性之影響-2010與2013版本間之比較，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。呂欣俞，2019，審計委員會效率與財務報表可比較性之關聯性研究，私立東海大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。李佩芸，2016，銀行業的備抵呆帳夠嗎?-IFRS9之探討，國立交通大學管理學院財務金融學程碩士論文。李佳真，2019，財報可比性與其他綜合損益之價值攸關性研究，私立吳大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。李富貴、陳韻珊、韓沂璉、杜昀容，2017，財務報表可比性、無形資產與權益資金成本，管理與系統，第24卷，第1期：103-134。林維琪，2016，IFRS 9試用後對銀行業會計、業務流程及系統的影響-以預期損失模式評估金融資產減損，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程國際金融組碩士論文。林龍瑞，2018，IFRS 9金融工具分類之資訊內涵研究 --以金融業為例，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。邵莉與吳俊英，2012，不同層級公允價值信息的決策有用性研究-基於我國A股金融業的經驗分析，西部論壇，第22卷第3期：102-108。國際財務報導準則公報「財務報導之觀念架構」。國際財務報導準則第七號：「金融工具：揭露」。國際財務報導準則第九號：「金融工具」。國際財務報導準則第十三號：「公允價值衡量」。國際會計準則第三十九號：「金融工具：表達」。康立慧，2020，採用IFRS 9前後銀行壞帳費用提列之價值攸關性，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。張美圓，2020，採用IFRS 9前後銀行呆帳損失對盈餘資訊性之影響，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。張家銘，2018，其他綜合損益之價值攸關性－一般產業與金融業，國立高雄第一科技大學會計資訊系碩士班碩士論文。張惠雯，2014，採行IFRS下綜合損益總額、其他綜合損益及其組成項目之價值攸關性，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。梁嘉文，2015，營業淨利、淨利、綜合淨利及其它綜合損益總額於解釋股價報酬有用性之比較研究—台灣股市之實證研究，國立高雄應用科技大學財富與稅務管理系碩士在職專班碩士論文。陳世祥，2015，實施國際財務報導準則及公司治理對財務報表可比較性之影響， 私立東吳大學會計學系在職專班碩士論文。陳玉芳，2010，國際財務報導準則之價值攸關性研究，國立台灣大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。陳名賢，2012，IFRS 9對IABs分析與評價之引申涵意，私立天主教輔仁大學金融與國際企業學系金融碩士班碩士論文。陳季姍，2016，盈餘管理與財務報表可比較性之關聯性研究，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。陳俊光，2017，導入國際財務報導準則第9號「金融工具」(IFRS 9)對金融保險業債務工具投資之影響，國立台灣大學財務金融學系研究所碩士論。陳威麟，2020，採用國際財務報導準則第9號(IFRS 9)對金融資產投資之影響-以我國上市櫃一般產業為例，私立世新大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。傅妤婕，2014，其他綜合損益，本期淨利及權益真實價值，國立成功大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。黃文玲，2020，財務報表可比性對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響，私立中國文化大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。黃彥銘，2015，綜合淨利價值攸關性之研究，私立淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。廖千瑱，2019，IFRS 9對上市公司之資訊攸關性與投資人之影響，國立台灣大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。劉彥弦與蘇淑慧，2017，我國導入國際財務報導準則各階段資訊可比較性之探討，當代會計，第18卷，第2期：187-216。蔡士嘉，2011，公平價值階層資訊之攸關性與公司治理機制之影響：台灣資本市場為例，國立成功大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。蔡雅琪，2009，金融商品公平價值資訊報導方式改變對企業價值攸關性之影響—以銀行業為例，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。蕭喻文，2014，我國綜合損益項目之價值攸關性，國立台灣大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。戴秋如，2020，實施IFRS 9金融工具對財報價值攸關性之影響，國立高雄科技大學會計資訊系碩士班碩士論文。英文參考文獻Ahmed, A. S., Kilic, and G. J. Lobo. 2006. Recognition versus disclosure matter? Evidence from value relevance of banks` recognized and disclosed derivative financial instrument. The Accounting Review81: 567-588.Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver and W. R. Landsman. 1996. Value-relevance of banks` fair value discloses under SFAS NO.107. The Accounting Review71: 513-537.Ball and Ray. 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and business research36 (1): 5-27.Brochet, F., A. Jagolinzer, and E. Riedl. 2013. Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research 30 (4): 1373-1400.Callao, S., J. I. Jarne, and J. A. Laínez. 2007. Adoption of IFRS in Spain: Effect on thecomparability and relevance of financial reporting. Journal of InternationalAccounting, Auditing and Taxation 16 (2): 148-178.Cascino, S., and J. Gassen. 2015. What drives the comparability effect of mandatoryIFRS adoption? Review of Accounting Studies 20 (1): 242-282.Chen, Ciao-Wei, Collins, Daniel W., Kravet, Todd D., Mergenthaler, Richard D. 2018. Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions. Contemporary accounting research35(1): 164-202.Dhaliwal, D., K. R. Subramanyam, and R. Trezevant. 1999. Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? Journal of Accounting and Economics26 (1-3): 43-67.DeFond, M., Xuesong Hu, Mingyi Hung , Siqi Li. 2011. Journal of Accounting and Economics 51 (3): 240–258.De Franco, G., S. P. Kothari, and R. S. Verdi. 2011. The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research 49 (4): 895-931.Francis, J., Ryan LaFond, Per Olsson, Katherine Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics39 (2): 295–327.Healy, P. M. 1996. Discussion of A Market-based Evaluation of Discretionary Accrual Models. Journal of Accounting Research(34): 107-115.Horton, J., S. George, and S. Ioanna. 2013. Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve the Information Environment? Contemporary accounting research30(1): 388-423.Jarne, and Ignacio, J. 2010. Have IFRS Affected Earnings Management un the European Union? Accounting in Europe7(2): 129-189.Kothari, S. P. 2000. Discussion of “The Relation between Analysts` Forecasts of Long-Term Earnings Growth and Stock Price Performance Following Equity Officering. Contemporary Accounting Research(17): 33-39.Kanagaretnam, K., Mathieu, R. & Shehata, M. 2008. Usefulness of Comprehensive Income Reporting in Canada. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Forthcoming.Neel, M. 2017. Accounting Comparability and Economic Outcomes of Mandatory IFRS Adoption. Contemporary accounting research34(1): 658-690.Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research11(2): 661-687.Song, C. J., Thomas, W. B., and Yi, Han. 2010. Value relevance of FAS NO.157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review 85(4): 1375-1410.Wang, C. 2014. Accounting standards harmonization and financial statementcomparability: Evidence from transnational information transfer. Journal of Accounting Research 52 (4): 955-992.Yip, R. Y., and D. Young. 2012. Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve information comparability? The Accounting Review 87 (5): 1767-1789. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6814/NCCU202100486 | en_US |
