dc.contributor.advisor | 李曉惠 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lee, Hsiao-Hui | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 蕭裕翰 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Hsiao, John | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 蕭裕翰 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Hsiao, John | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2021 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 1-Jul-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 1-Jul-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-Jul-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0106933001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135961 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA) | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 106933001 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | For environmental protection, a global sulphur cap on ocean bunkers was enforced on 1st January 2020 by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Through a one-year observation, this study investigates how the international shipping industry reacts to this new regulation. We specifically focus on the ocean carriers’ reactions to the new regulation before and after the regulation as well as these carrier’s clients’ attitude toward this new regulation. As 2020 is also a year with a serious global shock—Covid-19 pandemic, we also explore the demand and supply changes on ocean carriers and how that may lead to a different reaction toward this IMO 2020 regulation.The main purpose of the sulphur cap is for a better environmental protection, to force carriers to use higher quality bunkers, and to lower pollution emissions. On the other hand, it also means additional costs for the shipping industry, thereby bringing concerns for both ocean carriers and their clients for these increasing costs. Through this one-year observation, we analyzed three strategies (installing a scrubber, using a liquid natural gas engine, and burning 0.5 % sulphur oil,) that carriers can take to be compliant with the regulation and the reasons why they decide which strategy they decide to take based on corporate structures (e.g., cost forecasting, operations inefficiency, infrastructure availability, short or long-term concerns over financial implications). Moreover, we also found customer behaviors changed these carriers both mentally and physically toward IMO 2020 due to the reversion of supply and demand in the market.From these established findings, we make conclusion about the key factors and background of 2020 can lead to the successful implementation of IMO 2020 without serious obstacle as the market expected before 2020. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS1. Introduction 11.1. What is IMO 11.2. IMO’s goal—measures cover all fields of international shipping 31.3. What is IMO 2020? 41.4. Review mechanism and consequences of violating IMO 2020 51.5. Our goal of this thesis 72. Three options 92.1. Scrubber 102.2. LNG 112.3. 0.5% low Sulphur fuel 122.4. Pros & cons 123. Carriers’ reactions 153.1. Top 11 containerized carriers in the world 163.2. Firm choices 193.3. Pricing Strategy 234. Effect of Pandemic 254.1. Impact on demand 254.2. Impact on Supply 275. Conclusion 296. References 45 | zh_TW |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106933001 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 環境保護 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 航運業 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 規章 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 新冠病毒 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Environmental protection | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Shipping industry | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Regulation | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Covid-19 | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 國際海事組織2020低硫限制 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | IMO 2020 | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | References1. ABS advisory on exhaust gas scrubber system July 2018https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/advisories-and-debriefs/exhaust-gas-scrubber-systems-advisory.pdf2. IMO MARPOLhttps://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/ConferencesMeetings/Pages/Marpol.aspx3. IMO and the Sustainable Development Goalshttps://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/SustainableDevelopmentGoals.aspx4. IMO https://www.imo.org/5. Wet or Dry? Which Scrubber Type will Reign Supreme? IQPChttp://www.jadecreative.com/media/13881/Wet%20or%20Dry%20-%20Which%20Scrubber%20Type%20will%20Reign%20Supreme.doc.pdf6. Practical Design of Marine SOx Scrubber for Mega-Container Ships Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 56 No. 3 (September 2019)https://power.mhi.com/randd/technical-review/pdf/index_72e.pdf7. LNG as a marine fuel-our zero emissions future starts now SEA-LNG’shttps://sea-lng.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/200214_SEALNG2019reviewDIGITAL_compressed.pdf8. EPA Penalty for violations by Ships of the Sulfur in Fuel Standard and Related Provisionshttps://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-03/documents/marinepenaltypolicy.pdf9. PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS Reducing Shipping Emissions of Air Pollution Feasible and Cost-effective Optionshttps://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Air-Pollution.aspx10. Review of marine transportation 2019 UNCTADhttps://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf11. Sustainability Report 2019 ONEhttps://www.one-line.com/en/news/ocean-network-express-releases-2019-sustainability-report12. AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY Study on effects of the entry into force of the global 0.5% fuel oil sulphur content limit on human healthhttps://shippingwatch.com/article9069067.ece/binary/Svovl_tidlig_doed.pdf | zh_TW |
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6814/NCCU202100597 | en_US |