學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

題名 國際海事組織2020低硫限制
IMO 2020
作者 蕭裕翰
Hsiao, John
貢獻者 李曉惠
Lee, Hsiao-Hui
蕭裕翰
Hsiao, John
關鍵詞 環境保護
航運業
規章
新冠病毒
Environmental protection
Shipping industry
Regulation
Covid-19
日期 2021
上傳時間 1-七月-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8)
摘要 For environmental protection, a global sulphur cap on ocean bunkers was enforced on 1st January 2020 by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Through a one-year observation, this study investigates how the international shipping industry reacts to this new regulation. We specifically focus on the ocean carriers’ reactions to the new regulation before and after the regulation as well as these carrier’s clients’ attitude toward this new regulation. As 2020 is also a year with a serious global shock—Covid-19 pandemic, we also explore the demand and supply changes on ocean carriers and how that may lead to a different reaction toward this IMO 2020 regulation.
The main purpose of the sulphur cap is for a better environmental protection, to force carriers to use higher quality bunkers, and to lower pollution emissions. On the other hand, it also means additional costs for the shipping industry, thereby bringing concerns for both ocean carriers and their clients for these increasing costs. Through this one-year observation, we analyzed three strategies (installing a scrubber, using a liquid natural gas engine, and burning 0.5 % sulphur oil,) that carriers can take to be compliant with the regulation and the reasons why they decide which strategy they decide to take based on corporate structures (e.g., cost forecasting, operations inefficiency, infrastructure availability, short or long-term concerns over financial implications). Moreover, we also found customer behaviors changed these carriers both mentally and physically toward IMO 2020 due to the reversion of supply and demand in the market.
From these established findings, we make conclusion about the key factors and background of 2020 can lead to the successful implementation of IMO 2020 without serious obstacle as the market expected before 2020.
參考文獻 References
1. ABS advisory on exhaust gas scrubber system July 2018
https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/advisories-and-debriefs/exhaust-gas-scrubber-systems-advisory.pdf
2. IMO MARPOL
https://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/ConferencesMeetings/Pages/Marpol.aspx
3. IMO and the Sustainable Development Goals
https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/SustainableDevelopmentGoals.aspx
4. IMO https://www.imo.org/
5. Wet or Dry? Which Scrubber Type will Reign Supreme? IQPC
http://www.jadecreative.com/media/13881/Wet%20or%20Dry%20-%20Which%20Scrubber%20Type%20will%20Reign%20Supreme.doc.pdf
6. Practical Design of Marine SOx Scrubber for Mega-Container Ships Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 56 No. 3 (September 2019)
https://power.mhi.com/randd/technical-review/pdf/index_72e.pdf
7. LNG as a marine fuel-our zero emissions future starts now SEA-LNG’s
https://sea-lng.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/200214_SEALNG2019reviewDIGITAL_compressed.pdf
8. EPA Penalty for violations by Ships of the Sulfur in Fuel Standard and Related Provisions
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-03/documents/marinepenaltypolicy.pdf
9. PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS Reducing Shipping Emissions of Air Pollution Feasible and Cost-effective Options
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Air-Pollution.aspx
10. Review of marine transportation 2019 UNCTAD
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf
11. Sustainability Report 2019 ONE
https://www.one-line.com/en/news/ocean-network-express-releases-2019-sustainability-report
12. AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY Study on effects of the entry into force of the global 0.5% fuel oil sulphur content limit on human health
https://shippingwatch.com/article9069067.ece/binary/Svovl_tidlig_doed.pdf
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
106933001
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106933001
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李曉惠zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lee, Hsiao-Huien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蕭裕翰zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsiao, Johnen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蕭裕翰zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsiao, Johnen_US
dc.date (日期) 2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-七月-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-七月-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-七月-2021 19:00:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106933001en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135961-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 106933001zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) For environmental protection, a global sulphur cap on ocean bunkers was enforced on 1st January 2020 by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Through a one-year observation, this study investigates how the international shipping industry reacts to this new regulation. We specifically focus on the ocean carriers’ reactions to the new regulation before and after the regulation as well as these carrier’s clients’ attitude toward this new regulation. As 2020 is also a year with a serious global shock—Covid-19 pandemic, we also explore the demand and supply changes on ocean carriers and how that may lead to a different reaction toward this IMO 2020 regulation.
The main purpose of the sulphur cap is for a better environmental protection, to force carriers to use higher quality bunkers, and to lower pollution emissions. On the other hand, it also means additional costs for the shipping industry, thereby bringing concerns for both ocean carriers and their clients for these increasing costs. Through this one-year observation, we analyzed three strategies (installing a scrubber, using a liquid natural gas engine, and burning 0.5 % sulphur oil,) that carriers can take to be compliant with the regulation and the reasons why they decide which strategy they decide to take based on corporate structures (e.g., cost forecasting, operations inefficiency, infrastructure availability, short or long-term concerns over financial implications). Moreover, we also found customer behaviors changed these carriers both mentally and physically toward IMO 2020 due to the reversion of supply and demand in the market.
From these established findings, we make conclusion about the key factors and background of 2020 can lead to the successful implementation of IMO 2020 without serious obstacle as the market expected before 2020.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 1
1.1. What is IMO 1
1.2. IMO’s goal—measures cover all fields of international shipping 3
1.3. What is IMO 2020? 4
1.4. Review mechanism and consequences of violating IMO 2020 5
1.5. Our goal of this thesis 7
2. Three options 9
2.1. Scrubber 10
2.2. LNG 11
2.3. 0.5% low Sulphur fuel 12
2.4. Pros & cons 12
3. Carriers’ reactions 15
3.1. Top 11 containerized carriers in the world 16
3.2. Firm choices 19
3.3. Pricing Strategy 23
4. Effect of Pandemic 25
4.1. Impact on demand 25
4.2. Impact on Supply 27
5. Conclusion 29
6. References 45
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106933001en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 環境保護zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 航運業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規章zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新冠病毒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Environmental protectionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Shipping industryen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Regulationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Covid-19en_US
dc.title (題名) 國際海事組織2020低硫限制zh_TW
dc.title (題名) IMO 2020en_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) References
1. ABS advisory on exhaust gas scrubber system July 2018
https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/advisories-and-debriefs/exhaust-gas-scrubber-systems-advisory.pdf
2. IMO MARPOL
https://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/ConferencesMeetings/Pages/Marpol.aspx
3. IMO and the Sustainable Development Goals
https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/SustainableDevelopmentGoals.aspx
4. IMO https://www.imo.org/
5. Wet or Dry? Which Scrubber Type will Reign Supreme? IQPC
http://www.jadecreative.com/media/13881/Wet%20or%20Dry%20-%20Which%20Scrubber%20Type%20will%20Reign%20Supreme.doc.pdf
6. Practical Design of Marine SOx Scrubber for Mega-Container Ships Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 56 No. 3 (September 2019)
https://power.mhi.com/randd/technical-review/pdf/index_72e.pdf
7. LNG as a marine fuel-our zero emissions future starts now SEA-LNG’s
https://sea-lng.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/200214_SEALNG2019reviewDIGITAL_compressed.pdf
8. EPA Penalty for violations by Ships of the Sulfur in Fuel Standard and Related Provisions
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-03/documents/marinepenaltypolicy.pdf
9. PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS Reducing Shipping Emissions of Air Pollution Feasible and Cost-effective Options
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Air-Pollution.aspx
10. Review of marine transportation 2019 UNCTAD
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf
11. Sustainability Report 2019 ONE
https://www.one-line.com/en/news/ocean-network-express-releases-2019-sustainability-report
12. AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY Study on effects of the entry into force of the global 0.5% fuel oil sulphur content limit on human health
https://shippingwatch.com/article9069067.ece/binary/Svovl_tidlig_doed.pdf
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202100597en_US