| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳啟銘<br>黃家齊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 葉旻修 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Yeh, Min-Hsiu | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 葉旻修 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Yeh, Min-Hsiu | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2021 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 1-Jul-2021 21:27:40 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 1-Jul-2021 21:27:40 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-Jul-2021 21:27:40 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0108363028 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136024 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 108363028 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 2001年中華民國立法院三讀通過《金融控股公司法》，透過政策鼓勵金融機構間的相互整併，以強化台灣金融機構之產業競爭力同時促進金融市場以擁有健全發展為目標，前後共陸續設立了16家金控公司。於此同時，金控公司之雙引擎策略亦順勢而生，其中共分成攻擊型、轉機型、利基型與防禦型等四種類別。然本研究之主併公司（新光金）則被歸類為轉機型金控公司，需藉由壯大其銀行部位以強化整體金控公司之競爭力。另於2015-2017年全球經濟震盪，經歷2008年金融海嘯黑天鵝事件後，全國證券商競爭力重新洗牌，整體券商市場經營呈現強者越強，弱者越弱之趨勢，尤以具金控公司挹注資源之證券商更具競爭力。本研究主軸將採用類比公司評價法、EVA價值法進行該關係人交易之併購活動價值評估，並進一步探討其所提供之溢價是否產生過度支付之現象。同時，該主併公司於併購活動前已持有被併公司約33.45%之股份，故本研究將針對其策略層面深入探討為何提高持有之股份至100%。藉由個案分析得出以下結論：首先，此案例為一相關多角化之併購活動，其中更具備Social Ties之併購特性，進而影響其支付方式、支付價格以及併購後組織架構之整合。第二，透過主被併股權價值與綜效衡量，本研究認為該併購案屬一溢價但並未過度支付之併購案。第三，運用事件研究法（CAR）發現主併公司為負，被併公司為正。本研究認為該結果與支付價格有關。第四，透過文獻回顧發現於併購活動中，主要影響高階管理人員職位異動的因素有三：對併購結果利多因素具不確定性、組織文化難以整合以及被併方對主併方感到不信任而自行離開職位。然於此併購活動中並未發現該等隱憂，且主併公司過往已受讓其證券公司給予被併方運營，故並未針對其組織進行異動與所探討之文獻結論相符。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In 2001, the Legislative Yuan passed “ The Financial Holding Company Act ” to encourage financial institutions` mergers through the policy. A total of 16 financial holding companies have been established successively. Meanwhile, the Dual-Engine Strategies of financial holding companies emerges, and it is divided into four types: Attack Type, Conversion Type, Niche Type, and Defensive Type. In the study, the acquiring company (Shin Kong Financial Holdings) is classified into Conversion Type. The company needs to strengthen its business unit of banking to boost the overall competitiveness of the financial holding company.During the global economic turmoil in 2015-2017, attributed to the Black Swan Events of Financial Crisis in 2008, the competitiveness of securities firms has been reshuffled, and the overall market operations of securities firms have shown a trend that the stronger get stronger, and the weaker get weaker. In particular, securities firms with resources of financial holding companies are more competitive.The thesis adopted the appraisal method of Comparable Company and EVA (Economic Value Added) to evaluate the value of merge and acquisition activities of the related party transaction, and further explore whether the premium provided by Shin Kong Financial Holdings will cause excessive payment. Additionally, the acquiring company had been holding 33.45% shareholding before M&A activity so that the study also focuses on the reason why increase the shareholding to 100% on the level of strategy.The thesis draws the following conclusions. First of all, the case is a related diversified M&A activity, which has the characteristics of Social Ties. Moreover, the activity affects its payment method, payment price, and the integration of the post-merger organization structure. Secondly, through the evaluation of the equity value of the acquiring company and acquired company and business synergy, the study states the case is a premium but not an over-paid M&A case. Thirdly, adopting the method of Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR), the study suggests that the acquiring company is negative and the acquired company is positive. The study states the result is related to the price of payment. Last but not least, through the literature review, studies have suggested that there are three main factors will affect the position changes of senior managers: the uncertainty of factors that are positive for the results of the M&A activity, the difficulty of the integration of organizational culture, and the distrust from the acquired company to the acquiring company. However, these problems were not found in this research case. Besides, the securities company ( Hsin Shou Securities) of the acquiring company has been assigned to the acquired company for operation in 2009; hence, the acquiring company trusts the business effectiveness of the merged party and does not make any changes to its organization, which is consistent with the conclusion of the literature has shown. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄摘要 i謝誌 iv目錄 v表目錄 iv圖目錄 vi第一章 緒論 - 1 -第一節 研究動機 - 1 -第二節 研究問題與目的 - 6 -第三節 研究方法 - 6 -第二章 併購交易事前分析 - 7 -第一節 交易簡介 - 7 -第二節 公司介紹 - 10 -第三節 交易特性 - 13 -第四節 併購動機 - 24 -第三章 併購交易事中分析 - 28 -第一節 預期綜效 - 28 -第二節 支付方式 - 29 -第三節 主被併雙方評價_EVA評價法 - 30 -第四節 類似交易法 - 34 -第五節 換股比例合理性 - 35 -第四章 併購交易事後分析 - 45 -第一節 宣告日前後CAR計算 - 45 -第二節 宣告前後組織變動 - 47 -第三節 元富證與新光金之業務合作 - 49 -第五章 結論與建議 - 50 -第一節 個案結論 - 50 -第二節 個案發現 - 55 -第三節 研究限制與建議 - 57 -參考文獻 - 58 - | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 2331392 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363028 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 關係人交易 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 事件研究法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 社交關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 累積異常報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 經濟附加價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Related Party Transaction | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Social Ties | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | CAR(Cumulative Abnormal Return) | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | EVA(Economic Value Added) | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 企業併購案例分析：以新光金控併購元富證券為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Case study on merger and acquisition of Shin Kong Financial Holdings and MasterLink Securities | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部分：1.柯月絃，（2002），銀行、證券及保險業最適評價之研究，中華大學，企業管理學系，新竹市，Pp 49-582.杜豐吉，(2005)，國內金控公司之規模經濟與範疇經濟探討，國立台灣大學，經濟學系，台北市，Pp 67-693.程佩雯，(2005)，購併的市場資訊對股東財富造成的影響－以金融控股公司為例，國立台灣大學，會計學系，台北市，Pp 108-1134.鍾經樊、賴柏志、聞美晴，（2009），台灣雙卡風暴期間所推行之債務協商機制的道德風險問題，金融聯合徵信雙月刊第十期，台北市，Pp 15-175.吳啟銘，（2010），企業評價：個案實證分析，台北市，智勝出版社，Pp 19-416.黃美瑛，（2011），台灣金融業結合案例之經濟效益評估–金控公司範疇經濟衡量，公平交易季刊，第16卷第四期，Pp 31-66，台北市7.彭金隆，（2017），前瞻保險論壇：金控公司一定要有壽險子公司嗎，Advisers財務顧問，台北市8.孫楚涵，（2017），中信金控併購台灣人壽之個案研究，國立政治大學，企業管理研究所，台北市，Pp 46-549.蔡妙雪，（2018），主併公司在跨國併購財務顧問之選擇─以新興市場為例，國立政治大學，財務管理學系，台北市，Pp6-7；Pp43-4410.林威誠，（2018），企業併購案例分析：以Amazon併購Whole Foods 為例，國立政治大學，企業管理研究所，台北市，Pp 45-46英文部分：1.Bill B. Francis. Iftekhar Hasan, Xian Sun（2014），The certification role of financial advisors in cross-border M&As，International Review of Financial Analysis 32，Pp 143–1582.COSMOS Corporation. Robert K. Yin著，尚榮安（2001）譯，Pp 293.John C. Coates Ⅳ，（1999），“Fair Value” as an Avoidable Rule of Corporate Law：Minority Discounts in Conflict Transaction，Pp 147 U.PA. L. REV. 1251,12744.J. Ishii, Y. Xuan，(2014)，Journal of Financial Economics 112，Pp 344–3635.Walsh, J.P.，（1988）“Top Management Turnover Following Mergers and Acquisitions” ，Strategic Management Journal, 9，Pp 173-183.6.Stefano Caiazza, Alberto Franco Pozzolo（2017），The determinants of failed takeovers in the banking sector: Deal or country characteristics，Journal of Banking and Finance，Pp 7–117.Shradha Bindal, Christa H.S. Bouwman, Shuting（Sophia）Hu, Shane A. Johnson（2020），Bank Regulatory size thresholds, merger and acquisition behavior, and small business lending，Journal of Corporate Finance，Pp 298.Walsh, J.P.，（1989），“Doing a Deal：Merger and Acquisition Negotiations and Their Impact upon Target Company Top Management Turnover” Strategic Management Journal, 10，Pp 307-3229.Walsh, J.P. and J.W. Ellwood，（1991），“ Mergers, Acquisitions, and the Pruning of Managerial Deadwood，”Strategic Management Journal, 12, ，Pp 201-21610.Zhang, Y.，（2006），“The Presence of a Separate COO / President and Its Impact on Strategic Change and CEO Dismissal,”，Strategic Management Journal,27，Pp 283-300 | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6814/NCCU202100529 | en_US |
