學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 綠色基礎設施於都市「街區開放空間」對氣候變遷減緩與調適之綜效、權衡與共效益
Synergies, Trade-offs, and Co-benefits Between Green Infrastructure in the “Street Open Space” and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation作者 徐嘉信
Hsu, Chia-Hsin貢獻者 蔡育新
Tsai, Yu-Hsin
徐嘉信
Hsu, Chia-Hsin關鍵詞 氣候變遷減緩與調適策略
街區開放空間
綠色基礎設施
綜效
權衡
共效益
Climate Change mitigation and adaptation
“Street open space”
Green infrastructure
Synergies
Trade-offs
Co-benefits日期 2020 上傳時間 4-Aug-2021 15:49:19 (UTC+8) 摘要 綠色基礎設施具備達成減緩(Mitigation)與調適(Adaptation)策略之功能，為都市內因應氣候變遷威脅之重要空間，且為促進各部門策略整合與提升永續發展效益，聯合國IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)將綜效(Synergies)、權衡(Trade-offs)與共效益(Co-benefits)的概念融入減緩與調適策略中，然而，如何提升建成環境之綠化空間仍為目前有待解決之課題。本研究以位於臺北市主、次要道路，建物經過重建之「街區開放空間(street open space)」為研究對象，透過敘述性統計、斯皮爾曼等級相關係數(Spearman’s correlation)與多元迴歸分析(Multiple regression analysis)，實證分析建物重建對擴大街區開放空間、創造都市內新綠色基礎設施之機會，及街區尺度下綠色基礎設施對減緩調適策略與永續效益之發揮，與綜效、權衡與共效益之產生。研究結果顯示，藉由建物重建機會，街區開放空間具有提高的可能性，且整體規劃設計街區綠色基礎設施，對於因應氣候變遷威脅及促進都市永續發展，有機會達成綜效與共效益。
Ecosystem services from green infrastructure can achieve mitigation and adaptation strategies, so green infrastructure is important space in urban areas to confront with climate change. To combine different department’s strategies and promote sustainable development, IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) integrates the concept of Synergies, Trade-offs, and Co-benefits into mitigation and adaptation. However, how to use spatial planning to improve green infrastructure areas in the built environment is still a problem now. The research cases focus on “street open space” on the primary street in Taipei, and research methods include descriptive statistics, Spearman`s correlation and Multiple regression analysis. In addition to the analysis of synergies, trade-offs and co-benefits, the study aims to analyze the opportunities for creating new street open space and green spaces after building reconstruction. The research results show that there is possibility to increasing new green spaces in urban areas by spatial planning tools. Furthermore, green infrastructures which are designed comprehensively may not only cope with impacts of climate change but also bring about synergies and co-benefits.參考文獻 內政部. (2019). 建築技術規則建築設計施工編.交通部. (2004). 交通部停車格位與禁停標線之劃設原則.吳宇恆、廖學志、葉容君. (2019). 新北市目前人行道鋪面之節能減碳策略及其施工案例與成效. 鋪面工程, 頁 53-71.國家發展委員會(國發會). (2014a). 國家氣候變遷調適行動計畫（102-106年）.國家發展委員會(國發會). (2014b). 土地使用領域行動方案(102-106年).張學聖. (2014). 台灣都市更新推動回顧與省思. 腐際關係研究通訊第16期, 頁 12-14.梁紹芳. (2019). 捷運對都會區內都市土地遠距連接之影響-台北捷運實證研究. 國立政治大學地政學系研究所碩士論文.臺北市政府. (2010). 臺北市建築管理自治條例.臺北市政府. (2011). 臺北市土地使用分區管制規則.臺北市政府. (2015). 市區道路及附屬工程設計規範.臺北市政府. (2016). 臺北市新建建築物綠化實施規則.蔡育新、徐嘉信、王絢、林家靖. (2021a). 因應氣候變遷之都市街區規劃設計策略與永續「共效益」--建物重建階段. 都市與計劃.蔡育新、徐嘉信、林家靖. (2021b). 「街區開放空間」之氣候變遷規劃綜效與共效益-建物重建對主次要道路之驅動. (尚未發表).營建署. (2017). 市區道路植栽參考手冊.臺北市水綠地圖，取用自2020年5月http://pwdgis.taipei/wg/臺北市歷史圖資展示系統，取用自2020年3月http://www.historygis.udd.gov.taipei/urban/map/臺北市都市開發審議地圖，取用自2020年3月https://www.bim.udd.gov.taipei/UDDPlanMap/?recode=1建築資訊e點通，取用自2020年4月http://bme.gov.taipei/e/indexBud.aspx臺灣分區季節雨量的氣候特徵. (無日期). 擷取自 交通部中央氣象局: https://www.cwb.gov.tw/Data/service/hottopic/14277057430.pdf營建署. (2018). 都市人本交通道路規劃設計手冊(第二版). 擷取自 http://myway.cpami.gov.tw/Article/newsArticle/ArticleCont/185.html.Ashwini Chhatre and Arun Agrawal. (2009). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Ashwini Chhatre and Arun Agrawal. (2009年10月20日). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 頁 17667-17670.Benjamin Burkhard, Franziska Kroll, Stoyan Nedkov, Felix Müller. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators.C. Raudsepp-Hearne, G. D. Peterson, and E. M. Bennett. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.C.Y.Jim. (2004). Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 頁 311-320.C.Y.Jim. (2012). Sustainable urban greening strategies for compact cities in developing and developed economies. Urban Ecosystems, 頁 741-761.CasildaSaavedra, William W.Budd. (2009). Climate change and environmental planning: Working to build community resilience and adaptive capacity in Washington State, USA. Habitat International, 頁 246-252.ChangeIntergovernmental Panel on ClimateThe. (2014). Fifth Assessment Report.ChangeIntergovernmental Panel on ClimateThe. (無日期). Fourth Assessment Report. 2007.Cynthia Skelhorn, Sarah Lindley, Geoff Levermore. (2014). The impact of vegetation types on air and surface temperatures in a temperate city: A fine scale assessment in Manchester, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning.D. Armson, P. Stringer, A.R. Ennos. (2012). The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.D. Armson, P. Stringer, A.R. Ennos. (2013). The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.Dagmar Haase, Nina Schwarz, Michael Strohbach, Franziska Kroll, and Ralf Seppelt. (2012). Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the LeipzigHalle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society.Dagmar Hasse, Nina Schwarz, Michael Strohbach, Franziska Kroll and Ralf Seppelt. (2012). Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society.Daniele La Rosa, Riccardo Privitera, Luca Barbarossa, Paolo La Greca. (2016). Assessing spatial benefits of urban regeneration programs in a highly vulnerable urban context: A case study in Catania, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 頁 180-192.David J. Nowak, Daniel E. Crane. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution.Erik Andersson, Timon McPhearson, Peleg Kremer, Erik Gomez-Baggethun, Dagmar Haase, Magnus Tuvendal, Daniel Wurster . (2014). Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosystem Services .G. Robbert Biesbroek, Rob J. Swart, Wim G.M. van der Knaap. (2009). The mitigation-adapation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat International, 頁 230-237.GriffithC.Janice. (1994). Open Space Preservation: An Imperative for Quality Campus Environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 頁 645-669.Jack Aherna, Sarel Cilliers, Jari Niemelä. (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation. Landscape and Urban Planning .Jari Niemela¨ • Sanna-Riikka Saarela • Tarja So¨derman • Leena Kopperoinen • Vesa Yli-Pelkonen • Seija Va¨re • D. Johan Kotze. (2010). Although not yet widely used in planning practices, the ecosystem services approach can provide an opportunity for land-use planning to develop ecologically sustainable urban regions. Currently, information on ecosystem services of urban regions is lackin. Biodiversity Conservation, 頁 3225-3243.Jennifer A. Salmond, Marc Tadaki, Sotiris Vardoulakis, Katherine Arbuthnott, Andrew Coutts, Matthias Demuzere, Kim N. Dirks, Clare Heaviside, Shanon Lim, Helen Macintyre, Rachel N. McInnes and Benedict W. Wheeler. (2014). Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environmental Health .Jon Paul Rodríguez, T. Douglas Beard, Jr, Elena M. Bennett, Graeme S. Cumming, Steven J. Cork, John Agard, Andrew P. Dobson, and Garry D. Peterson. (2006). Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society.Julia Laukkonen, Paola Kim Blanco, Jennifer Lenhart, Marco Keiner, Branko Cavric, Cecilia Kinuthia-Njenga . (2009). Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat International.Kevin J. Gaston, Marıa L. Avila-Jimenez and Jill L. Edmondson. (2013). Managing urban ecosystems for goods and services. Journal of Applied Ecology .Lalisa A. Duguma, Meine van Noordwijk, Peter A. Minang. (2014). Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in the Land Use Sector: From Complementarity to Synergy. Environmental Management .Lalisa A. Duguma, Susan W. Wambugu, Peter A. Minang, Meine van Noordwijk . (2014). A systematic analysis of enabling conditions for synergy between climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in developing countries. Environmental science and policy.LarsenLarissa. (2015). Urban climate and adaptation strategies. Innovations in the Face of Climate Change.Lauren Persha, Arun Agrawal, Ashwini Chhatre. (2011). Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation. Science.M. Demuzere , K. Orru, O. Heidrich , E. Olazabal, D. Geneletti, H. Orru, A.G. Bhave, N. Mittal, E. Feliu e, M. Faehnle. (2014). Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management.Marthe L. Derkzen, Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen and Peter H. Verburg. (2015). Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on highresolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology.O’SullivanF. (2015). The Urban Planner’s Guide to a Post COP21 World. Next City. 擷取自 https://nextcity.org/features/view/cop-21-agreement-means-for-cities-climate-change.Osman Balaban and Jose Antonio Puppim de Oliveira. (2014). Understanding the links between urban regeneration and climatefriendly urban development: lessons from two case studies in Japan. Local Environment.Richard V. Pouyat, Ian D. Yesilonis, and David J. Nowak. (2006). Carbon Storage by Urban Soils in the United States. Journal of Environment Quality.S.E. Gill, J.F. Handley, A.R. Ennos and S. Pauleit. (2007). Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure. Built environment.Sara Meerow, Joshua P. Newell. (2017). Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning.Sarah Taylor Lovell, John R. Taylor. (2013). Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape ecology.Simon Farrugia , Malcolm D. Hudson & Lindsay McCulloch. (2013). An evaluation of flood control and urban cooling ecosystem services delivered by urban green infrastructure. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management.Stephanie A. Tomscha and Sarah E. Gergel. (2016). Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history. Ecology and Society.TahvonenOuti. (2018年1月23日). Adapting Bioretention Construction Details to Local Practices in Finland. Sustainability.Urban Design London. (2018). 8Designing Rain Gardens: A Practical Guide (2018). 擷取自 Urban Design London.V.Whitford, A.R. Ennos, J.F. Handley. (2001). "City form and natural process"—indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 頁 91-103.Wen Liu, Weiping Chen, Chi Peng. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecological Modelling.Wen Liu, Weiping Chen, Chi Peng. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecological Modelling.Wiebke Klemm, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Sanda Lenzholzer, Bert van Hove. (2015). Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on thermal comfort. Landscape and Urban Planning.Zoe G. Davies, Jill L. Edmondson, Andreas Heinemeyer, Jonathan R. Leake and Kevin J. Gaston. (2011). Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. Journal of Applied Ecology. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
107257015資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257015 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 蔡育新 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Tsai, Yu-Hsin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 徐嘉信 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Chia-Hsin en_US dc.creator (作者) 徐嘉信 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Chia-Hsin en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Aug-2021 15:49:19 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Aug-2021 15:49:19 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Aug-2021 15:49:19 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107257015 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136528 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107257015 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 綠色基礎設施具備達成減緩(Mitigation)與調適(Adaptation)策略之功能，為都市內因應氣候變遷威脅之重要空間，且為促進各部門策略整合與提升永續發展效益，聯合國IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)將綜效(Synergies)、權衡(Trade-offs)與共效益(Co-benefits)的概念融入減緩與調適策略中，然而，如何提升建成環境之綠化空間仍為目前有待解決之課題。本研究以位於臺北市主、次要道路，建物經過重建之「街區開放空間(street open space)」為研究對象，透過敘述性統計、斯皮爾曼等級相關係數(Spearman’s correlation)與多元迴歸分析(Multiple regression analysis)，實證分析建物重建對擴大街區開放空間、創造都市內新綠色基礎設施之機會，及街區尺度下綠色基礎設施對減緩調適策略與永續效益之發揮，與綜效、權衡與共效益之產生。研究結果顯示，藉由建物重建機會，街區開放空間具有提高的可能性，且整體規劃設計街區綠色基礎設施，對於因應氣候變遷威脅及促進都市永續發展，有機會達成綜效與共效益。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Ecosystem services from green infrastructure can achieve mitigation and adaptation strategies, so green infrastructure is important space in urban areas to confront with climate change. To combine different department’s strategies and promote sustainable development, IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) integrates the concept of Synergies, Trade-offs, and Co-benefits into mitigation and adaptation. However, how to use spatial planning to improve green infrastructure areas in the built environment is still a problem now. The research cases focus on “street open space” on the primary street in Taipei, and research methods include descriptive statistics, Spearman`s correlation and Multiple regression analysis. In addition to the analysis of synergies, trade-offs and co-benefits, the study aims to analyze the opportunities for creating new street open space and green spaces after building reconstruction. The research results show that there is possibility to increasing new green spaces in urban areas by spatial planning tools. Furthermore, green infrastructures which are designed comprehensively may not only cope with impacts of climate change but also bring about synergies and co-benefits. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究內容 4第三節 研究方法與流程 6第二章 文獻回顧 9第一節 都市街區綠色基礎設施和減緩調適策略 9第二節 「街區開放空間」於建物重建階段對落實減緩調適策略扮演之角色 20第三節 綜效、權衡與共效益之內涵 25第三章 研究設計 31第一節 研究架構 31第二節 研究變數 34第四章 實證分析 39第一節 敘述性統計分析 39第二節 街區開放空間之影響分析 43第三節 氣候變遷減緩調適與永續效益之影響分析 49第四節 綜效、權衡與共效益之影響分析 58第五節 假說驗證 61第五章 結論與建議 63第一節 結論 63第二節 政策建議與研究限制 64參考文獻 67 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4468198 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257015 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 氣候變遷減緩與調適策略 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 街區開放空間 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 綠色基礎設施 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 綜效 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 權衡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共效益 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Climate Change mitigation and adaptation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) “Street open space” en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Green infrastructure en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Synergies en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Trade-offs en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Co-benefits en_US dc.title (題名) 綠色基礎設施於都市「街區開放空間」對氣候變遷減緩與調適之綜效、權衡與共效益 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Synergies, Trade-offs, and Co-benefits Between Green Infrastructure in the “Street Open Space” and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部. (2019). 建築技術規則建築設計施工編.交通部. (2004). 交通部停車格位與禁停標線之劃設原則.吳宇恆、廖學志、葉容君. (2019). 新北市目前人行道鋪面之節能減碳策略及其施工案例與成效. 鋪面工程, 頁 53-71.國家發展委員會(國發會). (2014a). 國家氣候變遷調適行動計畫（102-106年）.國家發展委員會(國發會). (2014b). 土地使用領域行動方案(102-106年).張學聖. (2014). 台灣都市更新推動回顧與省思. 腐際關係研究通訊第16期, 頁 12-14.梁紹芳. (2019). 捷運對都會區內都市土地遠距連接之影響-台北捷運實證研究. 國立政治大學地政學系研究所碩士論文.臺北市政府. (2010). 臺北市建築管理自治條例.臺北市政府. (2011). 臺北市土地使用分區管制規則.臺北市政府. (2015). 市區道路及附屬工程設計規範.臺北市政府. (2016). 臺北市新建建築物綠化實施規則.蔡育新、徐嘉信、王絢、林家靖. (2021a). 因應氣候變遷之都市街區規劃設計策略與永續「共效益」--建物重建階段. 都市與計劃.蔡育新、徐嘉信、林家靖. (2021b). 「街區開放空間」之氣候變遷規劃綜效與共效益-建物重建對主次要道路之驅動. (尚未發表).營建署. (2017). 市區道路植栽參考手冊.臺北市水綠地圖，取用自2020年5月http://pwdgis.taipei/wg/臺北市歷史圖資展示系統，取用自2020年3月http://www.historygis.udd.gov.taipei/urban/map/臺北市都市開發審議地圖，取用自2020年3月https://www.bim.udd.gov.taipei/UDDPlanMap/?recode=1建築資訊e點通，取用自2020年4月http://bme.gov.taipei/e/indexBud.aspx臺灣分區季節雨量的氣候特徵. (無日期). 擷取自 交通部中央氣象局: https://www.cwb.gov.tw/Data/service/hottopic/14277057430.pdf營建署. (2018). 都市人本交通道路規劃設計手冊(第二版). 擷取自 http://myway.cpami.gov.tw/Article/newsArticle/ArticleCont/185.html.Ashwini Chhatre and Arun Agrawal. (2009). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Ashwini Chhatre and Arun Agrawal. (2009年10月20日). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 頁 17667-17670.Benjamin Burkhard, Franziska Kroll, Stoyan Nedkov, Felix Müller. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators.C. Raudsepp-Hearne, G. D. Peterson, and E. M. Bennett. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.C.Y.Jim. (2004). Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 頁 311-320.C.Y.Jim. (2012). Sustainable urban greening strategies for compact cities in developing and developed economies. Urban Ecosystems, 頁 741-761.CasildaSaavedra, William W.Budd. (2009). Climate change and environmental planning: Working to build community resilience and adaptive capacity in Washington State, USA. Habitat International, 頁 246-252.ChangeIntergovernmental Panel on ClimateThe. (2014). Fifth Assessment Report.ChangeIntergovernmental Panel on ClimateThe. (無日期). Fourth Assessment Report. 2007.Cynthia Skelhorn, Sarah Lindley, Geoff Levermore. (2014). The impact of vegetation types on air and surface temperatures in a temperate city: A fine scale assessment in Manchester, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning.D. Armson, P. Stringer, A.R. Ennos. (2012). The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.D. Armson, P. Stringer, A.R. Ennos. (2013). The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.Dagmar Haase, Nina Schwarz, Michael Strohbach, Franziska Kroll, and Ralf Seppelt. (2012). Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the LeipzigHalle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society.Dagmar Hasse, Nina Schwarz, Michael Strohbach, Franziska Kroll and Ralf Seppelt. (2012). Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society.Daniele La Rosa, Riccardo Privitera, Luca Barbarossa, Paolo La Greca. (2016). Assessing spatial benefits of urban regeneration programs in a highly vulnerable urban context: A case study in Catania, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 頁 180-192.David J. Nowak, Daniel E. Crane. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution.Erik Andersson, Timon McPhearson, Peleg Kremer, Erik Gomez-Baggethun, Dagmar Haase, Magnus Tuvendal, Daniel Wurster . (2014). Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosystem Services .G. Robbert Biesbroek, Rob J. Swart, Wim G.M. van der Knaap. (2009). The mitigation-adapation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat International, 頁 230-237.GriffithC.Janice. (1994). Open Space Preservation: An Imperative for Quality Campus Environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 頁 645-669.Jack Aherna, Sarel Cilliers, Jari Niemelä. (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation. Landscape and Urban Planning .Jari Niemela¨ • Sanna-Riikka Saarela • Tarja So¨derman • Leena Kopperoinen • Vesa Yli-Pelkonen • Seija Va¨re • D. Johan Kotze. (2010). Although not yet widely used in planning practices, the ecosystem services approach can provide an opportunity for land-use planning to develop ecologically sustainable urban regions. Currently, information on ecosystem services of urban regions is lackin. Biodiversity Conservation, 頁 3225-3243.Jennifer A. Salmond, Marc Tadaki, Sotiris Vardoulakis, Katherine Arbuthnott, Andrew Coutts, Matthias Demuzere, Kim N. Dirks, Clare Heaviside, Shanon Lim, Helen Macintyre, Rachel N. McInnes and Benedict W. Wheeler. (2014). Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environmental Health .Jon Paul Rodríguez, T. Douglas Beard, Jr, Elena M. Bennett, Graeme S. Cumming, Steven J. Cork, John Agard, Andrew P. Dobson, and Garry D. Peterson. (2006). Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society.Julia Laukkonen, Paola Kim Blanco, Jennifer Lenhart, Marco Keiner, Branko Cavric, Cecilia Kinuthia-Njenga . (2009). Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat International.Kevin J. Gaston, Marıa L. Avila-Jimenez and Jill L. Edmondson. (2013). Managing urban ecosystems for goods and services. Journal of Applied Ecology .Lalisa A. Duguma, Meine van Noordwijk, Peter A. Minang. (2014). Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in the Land Use Sector: From Complementarity to Synergy. Environmental Management .Lalisa A. Duguma, Susan W. Wambugu, Peter A. Minang, Meine van Noordwijk . (2014). A systematic analysis of enabling conditions for synergy between climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in developing countries. Environmental science and policy.LarsenLarissa. (2015). Urban climate and adaptation strategies. Innovations in the Face of Climate Change.Lauren Persha, Arun Agrawal, Ashwini Chhatre. (2011). Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation. Science.M. Demuzere , K. Orru, O. Heidrich , E. Olazabal, D. Geneletti, H. Orru, A.G. Bhave, N. Mittal, E. Feliu e, M. Faehnle. (2014). Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management.Marthe L. Derkzen, Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen and Peter H. Verburg. (2015). Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on highresolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology.O’SullivanF. (2015). The Urban Planner’s Guide to a Post COP21 World. Next City. 擷取自 https://nextcity.org/features/view/cop-21-agreement-means-for-cities-climate-change.Osman Balaban and Jose Antonio Puppim de Oliveira. (2014). Understanding the links between urban regeneration and climatefriendly urban development: lessons from two case studies in Japan. Local Environment.Richard V. Pouyat, Ian D. Yesilonis, and David J. Nowak. (2006). Carbon Storage by Urban Soils in the United States. Journal of Environment Quality.S.E. Gill, J.F. Handley, A.R. Ennos and S. Pauleit. (2007). Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure. Built environment.Sara Meerow, Joshua P. Newell. (2017). Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning.Sarah Taylor Lovell, John R. Taylor. (2013). Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape ecology.Simon Farrugia , Malcolm D. Hudson & Lindsay McCulloch. (2013). An evaluation of flood control and urban cooling ecosystem services delivered by urban green infrastructure. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management.Stephanie A. Tomscha and Sarah E. Gergel. (2016). Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history. Ecology and Society.TahvonenOuti. (2018年1月23日). Adapting Bioretention Construction Details to Local Practices in Finland. Sustainability.Urban Design London. (2018). 8Designing Rain Gardens: A Practical Guide (2018). 擷取自 Urban Design London.V.Whitford, A.R. Ennos, J.F. Handley. (2001). "City form and natural process"—indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 頁 91-103.Wen Liu, Weiping Chen, Chi Peng. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecological Modelling.Wen Liu, Weiping Chen, Chi Peng. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecological Modelling.Wiebke Klemm, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Sanda Lenzholzer, Bert van Hove. (2015). Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on thermal comfort. Landscape and Urban Planning.Zoe G. Davies, Jill L. Edmondson, Andreas Heinemeyer, Jonathan R. Leake and Kevin J. Gaston. (2011). Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. Journal of Applied Ecology. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202100801 en_US
