學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 影響老年人居住安排的決定因素
The determinants of living arrangement of elderly people作者 林雁舷
Lin, Yan-Sian貢獻者 連賢明
林雁舷
Lin, Yan-Sian關鍵詞 居住安排
老年人
心理因素
living arrangements
elderly
psychological factors日期 2021 上傳時間 4-Aug-2021 16:04:12 (UTC+8) 摘要 本文採用行政院衛福部於2007年提出之「中老年身心社會生活狀況長期追蹤調查」來探討影響老年人居住安排的決定因素，而本文所指的居住安排分為與子女同住與未與子女同住，並納入老年人之個人特質、居住情況、健康狀況、心理狀況、經濟狀況及子女之個人特質這六大類的解釋變數，採用binomial logit model來分析影響老年人是否與子女同住的因素。研究中發現：中國孝道觀念仍對我國老年人影響深遠，老年人在居住安排選擇上，多半選擇與子女同住。實證結果顯示，年齡越大、教育程度較低、省籍為本省人、沒有伴侶、居住於雙北地區、沒有住屋所有權、日常生活無困難、子女個數越多、平均年齡越輕及平均教育程度越低的老年人將會傾向與子女同住。最後，本文著重在老年人的心理層面上，因此加入與家人關係、關心、重視及包容程度四個指標，觀察心理因素對居住安排的影響，實證結果顯示：與家人關係越好、家人越關心老年人將會提高同住的意願，不過同時也觀察到長期同住的家庭，可能因為彼此某些生活習慣或做事方式不同，因此會出現摩擦的情況。
This article uses the " 2007 Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging " proposed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare to explore the determinants of the living arrangements of the elderly. In this article,I divided living arrangements into coresidence and nonresidence with child, and including the six major independent variables of the elderly’s personal characteristics, living conditions, health conditions, psychological conditions,economic conditions and the personal characteristics of their children, using the binomial logit model to analyze that factors of living together with the elderly.The study found that chinese concept of filial piety still has influence in our country, and most of the elderly choose to coreside with their children. The empirical results show that the older age, the lower education level, the Taiwanese , no partner, living in Taipei or New Taipei City, no housing ownership, no difficulty in daily life,more children,the children’s average age are younger will tend to live with their children.Finally, this article focuses on the psychological level of the elderly, so four indicators of relationship with family, care, attention, and tolerance are added to observe the impact of psychological factors on living arrangements. The empirical results show that the better relationship with family members,more concerned by family members will improve coresidence. But at the same time it has been observed that family relationship who live together for a long time may deteriorate because of their different living habits or ways of doing things.參考文獻 中文部分我國政府資料內政部全球資訊網，最新統計指標，檢自：https://web.moi.gov.tw/stat_chart/chart_full.aspx。內政部戶政司全球資訊網，人口統計資料，檢自：https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346。內政部統計月報，鄉鎮市區人口及按都會區統計，檢自：https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/400/relfile/0/4413/aae2b73a-cbc3-4700-a748-03bbd9e2c932/month/month.html。內政部統計處內政統計資訊網，檢自：https://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100。行政院主計處，都市化程度，檢自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/662017264471.pdf。行政院衛生福利部統計處，106年老人狀況調查。行政院衛生福利部國民健康署，民國96年台灣地區中老年身心社會生活狀況長期追蹤(第6次)調查成果報告。勞動部勞動統計查詢網，檢自：https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/index01.aspx。中文文獻王叢桂、羅國英，(2016)。中高齡工作者生活形態與心理需求契合度對其生活適應影響之研究。人文與社會科學簡訊，第17卷第3期，頁24-31。伊慶春，（2009）。臺灣人口老化問題。人口老化與家庭。臺北：中研院經研所、孫運璿基金會，頁49-68。沈姍姍，(2006)。貧窮與教育關係之探討：兼論我國相關之教育政策。教育研究與發展期刊，第二卷第三期，頁35-62。周玉慧、莊義利，（2000）。晚年生活壓力、社會支持與老人身心健康之變遷：長期資料分析。人文及社會科學集刊，第12卷第2期，頁281-317。林純祺(2008)。影響臺灣老年人居住安排因素之探討。國立政治大學，財政研究所，臺北市。周慕姿，（2017）。情緒勒索：那些在伴侶、親子、職場間，最讓人窒息的相處。臺北市：寶瓶文化。周麗端、唐先梅、林素秋、邱奕嫺及黃韻瑜，（2020）。高級中等以下學校及幼兒園家庭教育議題教師手冊 II主題軸二：家人關係與互動。臺北市：教育部。胡幼慧、周雅容，（1996）。婦女與三代同堂：老年婦女的經濟依賴與居住困境探索。婦女與兩性學刊，第7期，頁27-57。徐良熙、林忠正，（1989）。家庭結構及社會變遷的再研究。伊慶春、朱瑞玲主編，臺灣社會現象的分析，臺北：中研院三研所，頁25-55。陳肇男、史培爾，(1990)。臺灣地區現代化過程中對老人的居住安排之影響，人口變遷與經濟社會發展研討會論文集，臺中：中國人口學會。陳肇男，(1993)。臺灣地區鰥寡老人之居住安排。台灣社會學刊，第17期，頁163-179。陳淑美、張金鶚，(2004)。三代同堂家庭遷移決策之研究。人文及社會科學集刊，第16卷第2期，頁325-349。陳淑美、林佩萱，(2010)。親子世代的財務支援、照顧需求對老人居住安排與生活滿意度影響之研究。住宅學報，第十九卷第一期，頁29-58。陳正芬、呂寶靜、王彥雯，(2011)。台灣不同族群老人長期照護需要差異之趨勢分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌，第30卷第2期，頁165-179。陳彥仲、王璽權，(2016)。華人孝道觀念與高齡者世代間居住安排之決策。人文與社會科學簡訊，第17卷第3期，頁32-37。張桂霖、張金鶚，（2010）。老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換：家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討。人口學刊，第40期，頁41-90。張慈佳，(2017)。性別角色態度對臺灣老人居住安排的影響。人口學刊，第 54 期，頁 81-122。曾瀝儀、張金鶚、陳淑美，（2006）。老人居住安排選擇—代間關係之探討。住宅學報，第15卷第2期，頁45-64。葉光輝，(1997)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究：孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，第83期，頁121-168。楊靜利、陳寬政，(2002)。台灣地區子女離家的原因與步調。人口學刊，第25期，頁120-144。楊文山，(2009)。臺灣地區家戶組成變遷與家人關係。人文與社會科學簡訊，第10卷第2期，頁20-27。劉正、齊力，(2019)。臺灣高齡者的居住狀況與機構照顧的需求趨勢。國土及公共治理季刊，第七卷第一期，頁70-81。劉蓉果、朱瑞玲，（2019）。家庭故事的傳承：個體能動性的展現。載於周玉慧、葉光輝、張仁和（主編），華人家庭、代間關係與群際認同（1-49頁）。臺北市：中研院民族所。薛承泰，(2008)。臺灣家庭變遷與老人居住型態：現況與未來。社區發展季刊，第121期，頁47-56。羅紀琼，（1987）。近十年來臺灣地區老人家庭結構變遷的研究。臺灣經濟預測，第18卷，頁83-107。 外文部分Asis, M. M. B., Domingo, L., Knodel, J., and Mehta, K. ,(1995), “Living Arrangements in Four Asian Countries: A Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10: 145-162.Aykan, H. and D. A. Wolf,(2000), “Traditionality, Modernity, and Household Composition”,Research on Aging 22(4):395-421.Brown, J. W., J. Liang, N. Krause, H. Akiyama, H. Sugisawa, and T. Fukaya,(2002), “Transitions in Living Arrangements among Elders in Japan:Does Health Make a Difference? ”,Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences57B:s209-s220.Berngruber, A. ,(2015), “Generation Boomerang’ in Germany? Returning to the Parental Home in Young Adulthood.” Journal of Youth Studies 18(10): 1274-1290.Chen, C. N.,(1996), “Living Arrangements and Economic Support for the Elderly in Taiwan. ”,Journal of Population Study 17:59-82.Cameron, L.,(2000), “The Residency Decision of Elderly Indonesians: A Nested Logit Analysis”, Demography, 37(1): 17-27.DaVanzo, J. and Goldscheider, F. K.,(1990), “Coming Home Again: Returns to the Parental Home of Young Adults”, Population Studies, 44: 241-255.DaVanzo, J. and Chan, A. ,(1994), “Living Arrangements of Older Malaysians: Who Coresides with Their Adult Children?”, Demography 31(1): 95-113.Dettling, L. J. and J. W. Hsu. ,(2018), “Returning to the Nest: Debt and Parental Co-Residence among Young Adults.” Labour Economics 54: 225-236.Fingerman, K. L., Y.-P. Cheng, E. D. Wesselmann, S. Zarit, F. Furstenberg,and K. S. Birditt. ,(2012), “Helicopter Parents and Landing Pad Kids:Intense Parental Support of Grown Children.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74(4): 880-896.Kojima, H. ,(1986), “Parent-Child Coresidence in the Japanese Household. ”, Paper Presented at 1987 PAA meeting, Apr30-May2, chicago, IL.Kramarow, E. A. (1995), “The Elderly Who Live Alone in the United States: Historical Perspectives on Household Change”, Demography 32(3): 335-352.Karagiannaki, E. ,(2005), “Changes in the Living Arrangements of Elderly People in Greece: 1974-1999”, Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion, Case/104.Lee, M.-L., Lin, H.-S., and Chang, M.-C. ,(1995), “Living Arrangements of the Elderly in Taiwan: Qualitative Evidence”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10, pp. 53-78.Logan, J. R., F. Bian, and Y. Bian, (1998), “Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements." Social Forces 76:851-882.Logan, J. R. and F. Bian, (1999), “Family Values and Coresidence With Married Children in Urban China. ”,Social Forces 77:1253-1282.Lin, J.P. and C.C. Yi, (2011), “Filial Norms and Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents in China and Taiwan”,International Journal of Social Welfare 20: S109-S120.Matthews, H. Sarah,(1987) “Perceptions of Fairness in the Division of Responsibility for Old Parents,” Social Justice Research. 1: 425-437.Martin, L. G.,(1989), “Living Arrangements of the Elderly in Fiji, Korea, Malaysia, and the Philippines”, Demography 26(4): 627-643.Ofstedal, M. B.,(1995), “Coresidence Choices of Elderly Parents and Adult Children in Taiwan. ”,Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Otters, R. V. and J. F. Hollander.,(2015), “Leaving Home and Boomerang Decisions: A Family Simulation Protocol.” Marriage & Family Review 51(1): 39-58.Raymo, J. M. and T. Kaneda, (2003), “Changes in the Living Arrangements of Japanese Elderly: The Role of Demographic Factors,”,Pp. 27-52 in Demographic Change and the Family in Japan`s Aging Society, edited by Traphagan,W. J. and J. Knight. New York: State University of New York Press.Shah, N. M., K. M. Yount, M. A. Shah, and I. Menon,(2002), “Living Arrangements of OlderWomen and Men in Kuwait. ”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 17:337-355.Steverink, N. and Lindenberg, S.,(2006), “Which social needs are important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging? ”, Psychology and Aging21(2): 281-290.Sadhna Diwan,Sang E Lee,and Soma Sen,(2010), “Expectations of Filial Obligation and Their Impact on Preferences for Future Living Arrangements of Middle-Aged and Older Asian Indian Immigrants”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 26(1):55-69.Townsend, Peter,(1968) “The Structure of the Family,” in Old People in Three Industrial Societies. 132-176.eds. E. Shanas, P. Townsend, D. Weder-burn, P. Hilhof, and J. Stenhouwer, New York:Atherton Press.Tokio Yasuda, Noriko Iwai, Chin-chun Yi and Guihua Xie,(2011), “Intergenerational Coresidence in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan: Comparative Analyses Based on the East Asian Social Survey 2006”,Journal of Comparative Family Studies 42(5): 703-722.Takagi, E. and M. Silverstein,(2006), “Intergenerational Coresidence of the Japanese Elderly: Are Cultural Norms Proactive or Reactive? ”,Research on Aging 28（4）: 473-492.Wolf, D. A., and Soldo, B. J.,(1988), “Household Composition Choices of Older Unmarried Women”, Demography, 25(3): 387-403. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
108255015資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255015 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 連賢明 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林雁舷 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Yan-Sian en_US dc.creator (作者) 林雁舷 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lin, Yan-Sian en_US dc.date (日期) 2021 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Aug-2021 16:04:12 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Aug-2021 16:04:12 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Aug-2021 16:04:12 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108255015 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136584 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 108255015 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文採用行政院衛福部於2007年提出之「中老年身心社會生活狀況長期追蹤調查」來探討影響老年人居住安排的決定因素，而本文所指的居住安排分為與子女同住與未與子女同住，並納入老年人之個人特質、居住情況、健康狀況、心理狀況、經濟狀況及子女之個人特質這六大類的解釋變數，採用binomial logit model來分析影響老年人是否與子女同住的因素。研究中發現：中國孝道觀念仍對我國老年人影響深遠，老年人在居住安排選擇上，多半選擇與子女同住。實證結果顯示，年齡越大、教育程度較低、省籍為本省人、沒有伴侶、居住於雙北地區、沒有住屋所有權、日常生活無困難、子女個數越多、平均年齡越輕及平均教育程度越低的老年人將會傾向與子女同住。最後，本文著重在老年人的心理層面上，因此加入與家人關係、關心、重視及包容程度四個指標，觀察心理因素對居住安排的影響，實證結果顯示：與家人關係越好、家人越關心老年人將會提高同住的意願，不過同時也觀察到長期同住的家庭，可能因為彼此某些生活習慣或做事方式不同，因此會出現摩擦的情況。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This article uses the " 2007 Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging " proposed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare to explore the determinants of the living arrangements of the elderly. In this article,I divided living arrangements into coresidence and nonresidence with child, and including the six major independent variables of the elderly’s personal characteristics, living conditions, health conditions, psychological conditions,economic conditions and the personal characteristics of their children, using the binomial logit model to analyze that factors of living together with the elderly.The study found that chinese concept of filial piety still has influence in our country, and most of the elderly choose to coreside with their children. The empirical results show that the older age, the lower education level, the Taiwanese , no partner, living in Taipei or New Taipei City, no housing ownership, no difficulty in daily life,more children,the children’s average age are younger will tend to live with their children.Finally, this article focuses on the psychological level of the elderly, so four indicators of relationship with family, care, attention, and tolerance are added to observe the impact of psychological factors on living arrangements. The empirical results show that the better relationship with family members,more concerned by family members will improve coresidence. But at the same time it has been observed that family relationship who live together for a long time may deteriorate because of their different living habits or ways of doing things. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭………………………………………………………………………………….1摘要………………………………………………………………………………….2目錄………………………………………………………………………………….4表次………………………………………………………………………………….5圖次………………………………………………………………………………….6第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………..7第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………...8第二節 研究目的與方法………...…………………………………………...18第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………………...19第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………............21第三章 實證模型之設定…………………………………………………………...27第四章 研究資料來源說明及研究限制…………………..……………………...31第一節 研究資料來源…………………………………………………...…...31第二節 研究資料之限制……………………………………………………..34第三節 各變數定義及處理…………………………………………………..34第四節 各變數之預測方向…………………………………………………..46第五章 實證分析結果……………………………………………………………....53第一節 相關係數檢定………………………………………………………..53第二節 敘述統計……………………………………………………………...55第三節 實證結果……………………………………………………………...62第六章 結論與未來研究建議………...………………………………………........67第一節 結論……………………………………………………………............67第二節 未來研究建議……..…………………………………………............69參考文獻……………………………………….............................70 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2430162 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255015 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 居住安排 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 老年人 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 心理因素 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) living arrangements en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) elderly en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) psychological factors en_US dc.title (題名) 影響老年人居住安排的決定因素 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The determinants of living arrangement of elderly people en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分我國政府資料內政部全球資訊網，最新統計指標，檢自：https://web.moi.gov.tw/stat_chart/chart_full.aspx。內政部戶政司全球資訊網，人口統計資料，檢自：https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346。內政部統計月報，鄉鎮市區人口及按都會區統計，檢自：https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/400/relfile/0/4413/aae2b73a-cbc3-4700-a748-03bbd9e2c932/month/month.html。內政部統計處內政統計資訊網，檢自：https://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100。行政院主計處，都市化程度，檢自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/662017264471.pdf。行政院衛生福利部統計處，106年老人狀況調查。行政院衛生福利部國民健康署，民國96年台灣地區中老年身心社會生活狀況長期追蹤(第6次)調查成果報告。勞動部勞動統計查詢網，檢自：https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/index01.aspx。中文文獻王叢桂、羅國英，(2016)。中高齡工作者生活形態與心理需求契合度對其生活適應影響之研究。人文與社會科學簡訊，第17卷第3期，頁24-31。伊慶春，（2009）。臺灣人口老化問題。人口老化與家庭。臺北：中研院經研所、孫運璿基金會，頁49-68。沈姍姍，(2006)。貧窮與教育關係之探討：兼論我國相關之教育政策。教育研究與發展期刊，第二卷第三期，頁35-62。周玉慧、莊義利，（2000）。晚年生活壓力、社會支持與老人身心健康之變遷：長期資料分析。人文及社會科學集刊，第12卷第2期，頁281-317。林純祺(2008)。影響臺灣老年人居住安排因素之探討。國立政治大學，財政研究所，臺北市。周慕姿，（2017）。情緒勒索：那些在伴侶、親子、職場間，最讓人窒息的相處。臺北市：寶瓶文化。周麗端、唐先梅、林素秋、邱奕嫺及黃韻瑜，（2020）。高級中等以下學校及幼兒園家庭教育議題教師手冊 II主題軸二：家人關係與互動。臺北市：教育部。胡幼慧、周雅容，（1996）。婦女與三代同堂：老年婦女的經濟依賴與居住困境探索。婦女與兩性學刊，第7期，頁27-57。徐良熙、林忠正，（1989）。家庭結構及社會變遷的再研究。伊慶春、朱瑞玲主編，臺灣社會現象的分析，臺北：中研院三研所，頁25-55。陳肇男、史培爾，(1990)。臺灣地區現代化過程中對老人的居住安排之影響，人口變遷與經濟社會發展研討會論文集，臺中：中國人口學會。陳肇男，(1993)。臺灣地區鰥寡老人之居住安排。台灣社會學刊，第17期，頁163-179。陳淑美、張金鶚，(2004)。三代同堂家庭遷移決策之研究。人文及社會科學集刊，第16卷第2期，頁325-349。陳淑美、林佩萱，(2010)。親子世代的財務支援、照顧需求對老人居住安排與生活滿意度影響之研究。住宅學報，第十九卷第一期，頁29-58。陳正芬、呂寶靜、王彥雯，(2011)。台灣不同族群老人長期照護需要差異之趨勢分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌，第30卷第2期，頁165-179。陳彥仲、王璽權，(2016)。華人孝道觀念與高齡者世代間居住安排之決策。人文與社會科學簡訊，第17卷第3期，頁32-37。張桂霖、張金鶚，（2010）。老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換：家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討。人口學刊，第40期，頁41-90。張慈佳，(2017)。性別角色態度對臺灣老人居住安排的影響。人口學刊，第 54 期，頁 81-122。曾瀝儀、張金鶚、陳淑美，（2006）。老人居住安排選擇—代間關係之探討。住宅學報，第15卷第2期，頁45-64。葉光輝，(1997)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究：孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，第83期，頁121-168。楊靜利、陳寬政，(2002)。台灣地區子女離家的原因與步調。人口學刊，第25期，頁120-144。楊文山，(2009)。臺灣地區家戶組成變遷與家人關係。人文與社會科學簡訊，第10卷第2期，頁20-27。劉正、齊力，(2019)。臺灣高齡者的居住狀況與機構照顧的需求趨勢。國土及公共治理季刊，第七卷第一期，頁70-81。劉蓉果、朱瑞玲，（2019）。家庭故事的傳承：個體能動性的展現。載於周玉慧、葉光輝、張仁和（主編），華人家庭、代間關係與群際認同（1-49頁）。臺北市：中研院民族所。薛承泰，(2008)。臺灣家庭變遷與老人居住型態：現況與未來。社區發展季刊，第121期，頁47-56。羅紀琼，（1987）。近十年來臺灣地區老人家庭結構變遷的研究。臺灣經濟預測，第18卷，頁83-107。 外文部分Asis, M. M. B., Domingo, L., Knodel, J., and Mehta, K. ,(1995), “Living Arrangements in Four Asian Countries: A Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10: 145-162.Aykan, H. and D. A. Wolf,(2000), “Traditionality, Modernity, and Household Composition”,Research on Aging 22(4):395-421.Brown, J. W., J. Liang, N. Krause, H. Akiyama, H. Sugisawa, and T. Fukaya,(2002), “Transitions in Living Arrangements among Elders in Japan:Does Health Make a Difference? ”,Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences57B:s209-s220.Berngruber, A. ,(2015), “Generation Boomerang’ in Germany? Returning to the Parental Home in Young Adulthood.” Journal of Youth Studies 18(10): 1274-1290.Chen, C. N.,(1996), “Living Arrangements and Economic Support for the Elderly in Taiwan. ”,Journal of Population Study 17:59-82.Cameron, L.,(2000), “The Residency Decision of Elderly Indonesians: A Nested Logit Analysis”, Demography, 37(1): 17-27.DaVanzo, J. and Goldscheider, F. K.,(1990), “Coming Home Again: Returns to the Parental Home of Young Adults”, Population Studies, 44: 241-255.DaVanzo, J. and Chan, A. ,(1994), “Living Arrangements of Older Malaysians: Who Coresides with Their Adult Children?”, Demography 31(1): 95-113.Dettling, L. J. and J. W. Hsu. ,(2018), “Returning to the Nest: Debt and Parental Co-Residence among Young Adults.” Labour Economics 54: 225-236.Fingerman, K. L., Y.-P. Cheng, E. D. Wesselmann, S. Zarit, F. Furstenberg,and K. S. Birditt. ,(2012), “Helicopter Parents and Landing Pad Kids:Intense Parental Support of Grown Children.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74(4): 880-896.Kojima, H. ,(1986), “Parent-Child Coresidence in the Japanese Household. ”, Paper Presented at 1987 PAA meeting, Apr30-May2, chicago, IL.Kramarow, E. A. (1995), “The Elderly Who Live Alone in the United States: Historical Perspectives on Household Change”, Demography 32(3): 335-352.Karagiannaki, E. ,(2005), “Changes in the Living Arrangements of Elderly People in Greece: 1974-1999”, Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion, Case/104.Lee, M.-L., Lin, H.-S., and Chang, M.-C. ,(1995), “Living Arrangements of the Elderly in Taiwan: Qualitative Evidence”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10, pp. 53-78.Logan, J. R., F. Bian, and Y. Bian, (1998), “Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements." Social Forces 76:851-882.Logan, J. R. and F. Bian, (1999), “Family Values and Coresidence With Married Children in Urban China. ”,Social Forces 77:1253-1282.Lin, J.P. and C.C. Yi, (2011), “Filial Norms and Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents in China and Taiwan”,International Journal of Social Welfare 20: S109-S120.Matthews, H. Sarah,(1987) “Perceptions of Fairness in the Division of Responsibility for Old Parents,” Social Justice Research. 1: 425-437.Martin, L. G.,(1989), “Living Arrangements of the Elderly in Fiji, Korea, Malaysia, and the Philippines”, Demography 26(4): 627-643.Ofstedal, M. B.,(1995), “Coresidence Choices of Elderly Parents and Adult Children in Taiwan. ”,Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Otters, R. V. and J. F. Hollander.,(2015), “Leaving Home and Boomerang Decisions: A Family Simulation Protocol.” Marriage & Family Review 51(1): 39-58.Raymo, J. M. and T. Kaneda, (2003), “Changes in the Living Arrangements of Japanese Elderly: The Role of Demographic Factors,”,Pp. 27-52 in Demographic Change and the Family in Japan`s Aging Society, edited by Traphagan,W. J. and J. Knight. New York: State University of New York Press.Shah, N. M., K. M. Yount, M. A. Shah, and I. Menon,(2002), “Living Arrangements of OlderWomen and Men in Kuwait. ”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 17:337-355.Steverink, N. and Lindenberg, S.,(2006), “Which social needs are important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging? ”, Psychology and Aging21(2): 281-290.Sadhna Diwan,Sang E Lee,and Soma Sen,(2010), “Expectations of Filial Obligation and Their Impact on Preferences for Future Living Arrangements of Middle-Aged and Older Asian Indian Immigrants”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 26(1):55-69.Townsend, Peter,(1968) “The Structure of the Family,” in Old People in Three Industrial Societies. 132-176.eds. E. Shanas, P. Townsend, D. Weder-burn, P. Hilhof, and J. Stenhouwer, New York:Atherton Press.Tokio Yasuda, Noriko Iwai, Chin-chun Yi and Guihua Xie,(2011), “Intergenerational Coresidence in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan: Comparative Analyses Based on the East Asian Social Survey 2006”,Journal of Comparative Family Studies 42(5): 703-722.Takagi, E. and M. Silverstein,(2006), “Intergenerational Coresidence of the Japanese Elderly: Are Cultural Norms Proactive or Reactive? ”,Research on Aging 28（4）: 473-492.Wolf, D. A., and Soldo, B. J.,(1988), “Household Composition Choices of Older Unmarried Women”, Demography, 25(3): 387-403. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202100837 en_US
