學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 產業升級對出口二元邊際的影響
The Impact of Industrial Upgrading on the Dual Margin of Exports作者 周柏諺
Chou, Bo-Yen貢獻者 胡偉民
Hu, Wei-Min
周柏諺
Chou, Bo-Yen關鍵詞 產業升級
企業出口行為
出口二元邊際
Industrial Upgrading
Export Behavior of Enterprises
Dual Margin of Export日期 2021 上傳時間 4-Aug-2021 16:04:46 (UTC+8) 摘要 近年來，在各國對外貿易逐漸開放的情形下，一個國家的出口擴張往往成為牽動該國經濟成長的重要因素，有鑑於此，在研究出口擴張的過程中，對於出口擴張的模式以及其中的意涵等議題便成為相關研究的重點。在異質性企業理論提出以後，本文得以透過將出口擴張分解為貿易上的外延邊際以及貿易上的內延邊際，分析一國的出口成長路徑，並以此了解出口二元邊際其中所帶來的福利效果。 本文以研究出口二元邊際為出發點，使用《中國工業企業數據庫》，分析2003-2007年間各行業產業升級現象對於企業出口外延邊際以及出口內延邊際的影響，並且進一步分析在不同控股情形以及產業別下所造成的差異。本文主要的實證結果如下：當企業所屬行業有產業升級的現象發生時，將同時促使外延邊際以及內延邊際的擴張；進一步將樣本分為國有與非國有企業，當樣本企業為國有企業時，其所行業的產業升級現象對於外延邊際的影響將大於非國有企業，而在探討產業升級對內延邊際的影響時，產業升級對國有企業樣本之效果同樣大於非國有企業；在不同產業別底下，勞動密集產業其產業升級現象對於外延邊際的影響大於資本密集產業，而在探討產業升級對內延邊際造成的影響時，產業升級對勞動密集產業樣本之效果同樣大於資本密集產業。
In recent years, in the context of the gradual opening of foreign trade of various countries, a country’s export expansion has often become an important factor affecting the country’s economic growth. In view of this, in the process of studying export expansion, the pattern of export expansion and its implications have become the focus of related research. After the theory of heterogeneous enterprises was put forward, we were able to analyze a country’s export growth path by decomposing export expansion into trade extensive margins and trade intensive margins, and to understand the welfare effect of the dual margin of exports. Based on the study of the dual margin of export, this paper uses the "Database of China Industrial Enterprises" to analyze the impact of the industrial upgrading phenomenon of various industries on the extensive margin and the intensive margin of enterprises from 2003 to 2007, and further analyzes the difference between different holding situations and industries. The main empirical results of this paper are as follows: When an industry upgrade occurs in a company`s industry, it will promote the expansion of the extensive margin and the intensive margin at the same time; the sample is further divided into state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises, when the sample enterprise is a state-owned enterprise, The industrial upgrading phenomenon of its industry will have a greater impact on the extensive margin than non-state-owned enterprises. When discussing the impact of industrial upgrading on the intensive margin, the effect of industrial upgrading on the sample of state-owned enterprises is also greater than that of non-state-owned enterprises; under different industries, The industrial upgrading phenomenon of labor-intensive industries has a greater impact on the extensive margin than for capital-intensive industries. When discussing the impact of industrial upgrading on the intensive marginal, the effect of industrial upgrading on labor-intensive industry samples is also greater than that of capital-intensive industries.參考文獻 中文文獻1. 余明桂, 范蕊, & 鐘慧潔. (2016). 中國產業政策與企業技術創新. 中國工業經濟, (12), 5–22.2. 李浩仲, & 陳鎮洲. (2014). 中國大陸產業升級對廠商薪資外溢效果之影響. 中國大陸研究, 57(2), 23–41.3. 張杰, 陳志遠, & 劉元春. (2014). 中國出口國內附加值的測算與變化機制. 經濟研究, (10), 124–137.4. 張杰, 鄭文平, & 束蘭根. (2013). 融資約束如何影響中國企業出口的二元邊際? 世界經濟文匯, (4), 59–80.5. 盛丹, 包群, & 王永進. (2011). 基礎設施對中國企業出口行為的影響:“集約邊際”還是“擴展邊際.” 世界經濟, (1), 17–36.6. 陳勇兵, 李燕, & 周世民. (2012). 中國企業出口持續時間及其決定因素. 經濟研究, (7), 1–15.7. 楊汝岱. (2015). 中國製造業企業全要素生產率研究. 經濟研究, (2), 61–74.8. 趙偉, 趙金亮, & 韓媛媛. (2011). 異質性、沉沒成本與中國企業出口決定:來自中國微觀企業的經驗證據. 世界經濟, (4), 62–79.9. 趙婷, & 趙偉. (2012). 產業關聯視角的FDI出口溢出效應：分析與實證. 國際貿易問題, (2), 113–122.10. 魯曉東, & 連玉君. (2012). 中國工業企業全要素生產率估計：1999一2007. 經濟學季刊, 11(2), 541–558.11. 錢學鋒, & 熊平 . (2010). 中國出口增長的二元邊際及其因素決定：經驗研究. 經濟研究, (1), 1–22.英文文獻1. Aitken, B., Hanson, G. H., & Harrison, A. E. (1997). Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behavior. Journal of International Economics, 43(1–2), 103–132.2. Amiti , M., & Freund, C. (2007). An Anatomy of China’s Trade Growth. Trade Conference, IMF.3. Amurgo-Pacheco, A., and M. D. Pierola (2008). Patterns of export diversification in developing countries : intensive and extensive margins. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4473, The World Bank.4. Barrios, S., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2003). Explaining Firms’ Export Behaviour: R&D, Spillovers and the Destination Market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4), 475–496.5. Berman, N., & Héricourt, J. (2010). Financial Factors and the Margins of Trade: Evidence from Cross-Country Firm-Level Data. Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), 206–217.6. Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and Productivity in International Trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268–1290.7. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J.B. (1999). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.8. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, B. (2004). Entry, Expansion, and Intensity in the US Export Boom, 1987–1992. Review of International Economics, 12(4), 662–675.9. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in International Trade. Juornal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130.10. Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), 31–66.11. Bernard, A. B., & Wagner, J. (2001). Export Entry and Exit by German Firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137(1), 105–123.12. Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P. O., & Morgenroth, E. L. w. (1999). Infrastructure, Transport Costs and Trade. Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 169–189.13. Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707–1721.14. Chaney, T. (2016). Liquidity Constrained Exporters. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 72, 141–154.15. Debaere, P., & Mostashari, S. (2010). Do Tariffs Matter for the Extensive Margin of International Trade? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of International Economics, 81(2), 163–169.16. Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F. (2004). Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries, and Export Destinations. American Economic Review, 94(2), 150–154.17. Evenett, Simon J., Venables, Anthony J. (2002). Export Growth in Developing Countries: Market Entry and Bilateral Trade Flows. University of Bern working paper, mimeo.18. Felbermayr, G. J., & Kohler, W. (2006). Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade. Review of World Economics, 142(4), 642–674.19. Francois, J., & Manchin, M. O. (2013). Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade. World Development, 46, 165–175.20. Greenaway, D., Sousa, N., & Wakelin, K. (2004). Do Domestic Firms Learn to Export from Multinationals? European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 1027–1043.21. Hausmann, R. & Klinger, B. (2006). Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage in the Product Space. CID Working Paper, No. 128.22. Helpman, E., Melitz, marc , & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.23. Hirsch, S., & Bijaoui , I. (1985). R&D Intensity and Export Performance: A Micro View. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, (121), 238–251.24. Hsieh, C., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403–1448.25. Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports. American Economic Review, 95(3), 704–723.26. Ito, K., & Pucik, V. (1993). R&D Spending, Domestic Competition, and Export Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 61–75.27. Kang, K. (2004). The Path of the Extensive Margin (Export Variety): Theory and Evidence. University of California, Davis Working Paper, mimeo.28. Kneller, R., & Pisu, M. (2007). Industrial Linkages and Export Spillovers from FDI. The World Economy, 30(1), 105–134.29. Martina, L. (2008). Deconstructing Gravity: Trade Costs and Extensive and Intensive Margins. MPRA Paper No. 10230.30. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.31. Minetti, R. & Zhu, S. C. (2011). Credit Constraints and Firm Export: Microeconomic Evidence from Italy. Journal of International Economics, 83(2), 109–125.32. Olley, S. & Pakes A. (1996). The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263–1298.33. Pakes, A. (1994). Estimation of Dynamic Structural Models: Problems and Prospects Part II: Mixed Continuous-Discrete Models and Market Interactions. in: C. Sims and J.J. Laffont, eds., Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of the Econometric Society, Barcelona, Spain. Cambridge University Press.34. Roberts, M. J. & Tybout, J. R. (1997). The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs. American Economic Review, 87(4), 545–564.35. Rondeau, F. and Roudaut, N. (2014). What Diversification of Trade Matters for Economic Growth of Developing Countries. Economics Bulletin, 34(3), 1485-1497.36. Sheng, Y., Chen, C. & Findlay, C. (2011). Impact of FDI on Domestic Firms’ Exports in China. University of Adelaide Working Paper, (15). 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
108255019資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255019 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 胡偉民 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Hu, Wei-Min en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周柏諺 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou, Bo-Yen en_US dc.creator (作者) 周柏諺 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chou, Bo-Yen en_US dc.date (日期) 2021 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Aug-2021 16:04:46 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Aug-2021 16:04:46 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Aug-2021 16:04:46 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108255019 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136587 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 108255019 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來，在各國對外貿易逐漸開放的情形下，一個國家的出口擴張往往成為牽動該國經濟成長的重要因素，有鑑於此，在研究出口擴張的過程中，對於出口擴張的模式以及其中的意涵等議題便成為相關研究的重點。在異質性企業理論提出以後，本文得以透過將出口擴張分解為貿易上的外延邊際以及貿易上的內延邊際，分析一國的出口成長路徑，並以此了解出口二元邊際其中所帶來的福利效果。 本文以研究出口二元邊際為出發點，使用《中國工業企業數據庫》，分析2003-2007年間各行業產業升級現象對於企業出口外延邊際以及出口內延邊際的影響，並且進一步分析在不同控股情形以及產業別下所造成的差異。本文主要的實證結果如下：當企業所屬行業有產業升級的現象發生時，將同時促使外延邊際以及內延邊際的擴張；進一步將樣本分為國有與非國有企業，當樣本企業為國有企業時，其所行業的產業升級現象對於外延邊際的影響將大於非國有企業，而在探討產業升級對內延邊際的影響時，產業升級對國有企業樣本之效果同樣大於非國有企業；在不同產業別底下，勞動密集產業其產業升級現象對於外延邊際的影響大於資本密集產業，而在探討產業升級對內延邊際造成的影響時，產業升級對勞動密集產業樣本之效果同樣大於資本密集產業。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, in the context of the gradual opening of foreign trade of various countries, a country’s export expansion has often become an important factor affecting the country’s economic growth. In view of this, in the process of studying export expansion, the pattern of export expansion and its implications have become the focus of related research. After the theory of heterogeneous enterprises was put forward, we were able to analyze a country’s export growth path by decomposing export expansion into trade extensive margins and trade intensive margins, and to understand the welfare effect of the dual margin of exports. Based on the study of the dual margin of export, this paper uses the "Database of China Industrial Enterprises" to analyze the impact of the industrial upgrading phenomenon of various industries on the extensive margin and the intensive margin of enterprises from 2003 to 2007, and further analyzes the difference between different holding situations and industries. The main empirical results of this paper are as follows: When an industry upgrade occurs in a company`s industry, it will promote the expansion of the extensive margin and the intensive margin at the same time; the sample is further divided into state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises, when the sample enterprise is a state-owned enterprise, The industrial upgrading phenomenon of its industry will have a greater impact on the extensive margin than non-state-owned enterprises. When discussing the impact of industrial upgrading on the intensive margin, the effect of industrial upgrading on the sample of state-owned enterprises is also greater than that of non-state-owned enterprises; under different industries, The industrial upgrading phenomenon of labor-intensive industries has a greater impact on the extensive margin than for capital-intensive industries. When discussing the impact of industrial upgrading on the intensive marginal, the effect of industrial upgrading on labor-intensive industry samples is also greater than that of capital-intensive industries. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景 1第二節 研究目的 3第三節 研究架構 4第二章 文獻回顧 6第一節 出口二元邊際的定義 6第二節 出口二元邊際的衡量 7第三節 影響出口二元邊際的因素 8第四節 產業升級與出口之間的關係 10第三章 企業全要素生產率之衡量 12第一節 O-P方法介紹 12第二節 變數設定與樣本選擇 16第三節 全要素生產率衡量結果分析 21第四章 實證模型設定 24第一節 外延邊際（extensive margin）之模型設定 24第二節 外延邊際（extensive margin）之樣本選擇 28第三節 內延邊際（intensive margin）之模型設定 31第四節 內延邊際（intensive margin）之樣本選擇 34第五章 實證結果 37第一節 敘述性統計分析 37第二節 全樣本實證結果 41第三節 分樣本實證結果：按是否為國有企業 49第四節 分樣本實證結果：按產業別區分 54第六章 結論與研究限制 60參考資料 62 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1044463 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255019 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業升級 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業出口行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 出口二元邊際 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Industrial Upgrading en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Export Behavior of Enterprises en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dual Margin of Export en_US dc.title (題名) 產業升級對出口二元邊際的影響 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Impact of Industrial Upgrading on the Dual Margin of Exports en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻1. 余明桂, 范蕊, & 鐘慧潔. (2016). 中國產業政策與企業技術創新. 中國工業經濟, (12), 5–22.2. 李浩仲, & 陳鎮洲. (2014). 中國大陸產業升級對廠商薪資外溢效果之影響. 中國大陸研究, 57(2), 23–41.3. 張杰, 陳志遠, & 劉元春. (2014). 中國出口國內附加值的測算與變化機制. 經濟研究, (10), 124–137.4. 張杰, 鄭文平, & 束蘭根. (2013). 融資約束如何影響中國企業出口的二元邊際? 世界經濟文匯, (4), 59–80.5. 盛丹, 包群, & 王永進. (2011). 基礎設施對中國企業出口行為的影響:“集約邊際”還是“擴展邊際.” 世界經濟, (1), 17–36.6. 陳勇兵, 李燕, & 周世民. (2012). 中國企業出口持續時間及其決定因素. 經濟研究, (7), 1–15.7. 楊汝岱. (2015). 中國製造業企業全要素生產率研究. 經濟研究, (2), 61–74.8. 趙偉, 趙金亮, & 韓媛媛. (2011). 異質性、沉沒成本與中國企業出口決定:來自中國微觀企業的經驗證據. 世界經濟, (4), 62–79.9. 趙婷, & 趙偉. (2012). 產業關聯視角的FDI出口溢出效應：分析與實證. 國際貿易問題, (2), 113–122.10. 魯曉東, & 連玉君. (2012). 中國工業企業全要素生產率估計：1999一2007. 經濟學季刊, 11(2), 541–558.11. 錢學鋒, & 熊平 . (2010). 中國出口增長的二元邊際及其因素決定：經驗研究. 經濟研究, (1), 1–22.英文文獻1. Aitken, B., Hanson, G. H., & Harrison, A. E. (1997). Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behavior. Journal of International Economics, 43(1–2), 103–132.2. Amiti , M., & Freund, C. (2007). An Anatomy of China’s Trade Growth. Trade Conference, IMF.3. Amurgo-Pacheco, A., and M. D. Pierola (2008). Patterns of export diversification in developing countries : intensive and extensive margins. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4473, The World Bank.4. Barrios, S., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2003). Explaining Firms’ Export Behaviour: R&D, Spillovers and the Destination Market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4), 475–496.5. Berman, N., & Héricourt, J. (2010). Financial Factors and the Margins of Trade: Evidence from Cross-Country Firm-Level Data. Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), 206–217.6. Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and Productivity in International Trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268–1290.7. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J.B. (1999). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.8. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, B. (2004). Entry, Expansion, and Intensity in the US Export Boom, 1987–1992. Review of International Economics, 12(4), 662–675.9. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in International Trade. Juornal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130.10. Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), 31–66.11. Bernard, A. B., & Wagner, J. (2001). Export Entry and Exit by German Firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137(1), 105–123.12. Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P. O., & Morgenroth, E. L. w. (1999). Infrastructure, Transport Costs and Trade. Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 169–189.13. Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707–1721.14. Chaney, T. (2016). Liquidity Constrained Exporters. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 72, 141–154.15. Debaere, P., & Mostashari, S. (2010). Do Tariffs Matter for the Extensive Margin of International Trade? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of International Economics, 81(2), 163–169.16. Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F. (2004). Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries, and Export Destinations. American Economic Review, 94(2), 150–154.17. Evenett, Simon J., Venables, Anthony J. (2002). Export Growth in Developing Countries: Market Entry and Bilateral Trade Flows. University of Bern working paper, mimeo.18. Felbermayr, G. J., & Kohler, W. (2006). Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade. Review of World Economics, 142(4), 642–674.19. Francois, J., & Manchin, M. O. (2013). Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade. World Development, 46, 165–175.20. Greenaway, D., Sousa, N., & Wakelin, K. (2004). Do Domestic Firms Learn to Export from Multinationals? European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 1027–1043.21. Hausmann, R. & Klinger, B. (2006). Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage in the Product Space. CID Working Paper, No. 128.22. Helpman, E., Melitz, marc , & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.23. Hirsch, S., & Bijaoui , I. (1985). R&D Intensity and Export Performance: A Micro View. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, (121), 238–251.24. Hsieh, C., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403–1448.25. Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports. American Economic Review, 95(3), 704–723.26. Ito, K., & Pucik, V. (1993). R&D Spending, Domestic Competition, and Export Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 61–75.27. Kang, K. (2004). The Path of the Extensive Margin (Export Variety): Theory and Evidence. University of California, Davis Working Paper, mimeo.28. Kneller, R., & Pisu, M. (2007). Industrial Linkages and Export Spillovers from FDI. The World Economy, 30(1), 105–134.29. Martina, L. (2008). Deconstructing Gravity: Trade Costs and Extensive and Intensive Margins. MPRA Paper No. 10230.30. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.31. Minetti, R. & Zhu, S. C. (2011). Credit Constraints and Firm Export: Microeconomic Evidence from Italy. Journal of International Economics, 83(2), 109–125.32. Olley, S. & Pakes A. (1996). The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263–1298.33. Pakes, A. (1994). Estimation of Dynamic Structural Models: Problems and Prospects Part II: Mixed Continuous-Discrete Models and Market Interactions. in: C. Sims and J.J. Laffont, eds., Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of the Econometric Society, Barcelona, Spain. Cambridge University Press.34. Roberts, M. J. & Tybout, J. R. (1997). The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs. American Economic Review, 87(4), 545–564.35. Rondeau, F. and Roudaut, N. (2014). What Diversification of Trade Matters for Economic Growth of Developing Countries. Economics Bulletin, 34(3), 1485-1497.36. Sheng, Y., Chen, C. & Findlay, C. (2011). Impact of FDI on Domestic Firms’ Exports in China. University of Adelaide Working Paper, (15). zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202100839 en_US
