1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of International Affairs
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 德國對非洲的雙向援助
Bilateral Development Aid to Africa - The Case of Germany
作者 鹿西蒙
Reh, Simon Philipp
貢獻者 劉曉鵬
Liu, Philip Hsiaopong
鹿西蒙
Reh, Simon Philipp
關鍵詞 外援
德國
移民
貿易
良好的治理
Foreign Aid
Germany
Migration
Trade
Good Governance
日期 2021
上傳時間 4-Aug-2021 16:29:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 I am not able to write my abstract in Chinese.
This thesis uses a mixed-method approach to examine the underlying priorities of German development assistance to African countries. It pitches the self-interested motives of facilitating trade and curbing migration from the continent against the more altruistic goals of contributing to development, alleviating poverty and fostering good governance. The qualitative part of this study includes a presentation of the structure of the German aid regime and examines four key policy documents from the 18th and 19th legislative periods, covering the time spans from late 2013 to 2018 and 2018 to 2021, respectively. In the quantitative part, the four different motives are operationalized through several variables and tested against German aid flows by employing regression analysis. The data covers the entire 18th legislative period and the first half of the 19th legislative period. The qualitative examination shows that trade and migration are considered more relevant to foreign aid by the German policymakers in the 19th legislative period than they were in previous years. Poverty and development appear to have become slightly less relevant over time. The rule of law and democracy in recipient states are addressed over the whole time period, but the protection of human rights appears like a much higher priority. The quantitative analysis indicates that states with a higher population residing in Germany in fact do receive more aid, while the geographical distance from their home country to Germany seems to be irrelevant in the more recent years. Furthermore, it finds that German exports appear to be positively correlated with aid. Surprisingly, the measures employed to account for the development orientation of German aid are all insignificant. Moreover, democracy is the only dimension of good governance that appears to influence German aid allocation. Insofar, this thesis concludes that self-interested motives dominate over the altruistic ones. This practice may be explained by the realist theory of international relations. The results put the rhetoric of the German policymakers in question and may be an indication for German aid being inefficient when it comes to the promotion of development, good governance and the eradication of poverty in recipient countries.
參考文獻 Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874203400
Alesina, A., & Weder, B. (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344669
Andersen, U. (2020). Entwicklungspolitik [Development Policy]. In U. Andersen, J. Bogumil, S. Marschall, & W. Woyke (Eds.), Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Dictionary of the Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23670-0_43-1
Arvin, M., Cater, B., & Choudhry, S. (2000). A Causality Analysis of Untied Foreign Assistance and Export Performance: The Case of Germany. Applied Economics Letters, 7(5), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048500351465
Arvin, M., & Drewes, T. (2001). Are There Biases in German Bilateral Aid Allocations. Applied Economics Letters, 8(3), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850150504540
Ashoff, G. (2009). Institutioneller Reformbedarf in der bilateralen staatlichen deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, Analysen und Stellungnahmen, No. 8/2009 [Institutional Reform Needs in German Bilateral ODA, Analyses and Comments, No. 8/2009]. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/AuS_8.2009.pdf
Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2006). ‘Between a Rock & A Hard Place’: North Africa as a Region of Emigration, Immigration & Transit Migration. Review of African Political Economy, 33(108), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240600843089
102
Baydag, R. M., Klingebiel, S., & Marschall, P. (2018). Shaping the Patterns of Aid Allocation: A Comparative Analysis of Seven Bilateral Donors and the European Union, Discussion Paper, No. 22/2018. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_22.2018.pdf
Berger, H., & Ritschl, A. (1995). Germany and the Political Economy of the Marshall Plan, 1947-52: A Re-Revisionist View. In B. Eichengreen (Ed.), Europe’s Post-War Recovery (pp. 199–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bermeo, S. (2017). Aid Allocation and Targeted Development in an Increasingly Connected World. International Organization, 71(4), 735–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000315
Bermeo, S., & Leblang, D. (2015). Migration and Foreign Aid. International Organization, 69(3), 627–657. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000119
Berthélemy, J.-C. (2006). Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics, 10(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00311.x
Berthélemy, J.-C., & Tichit, A. (2004). Bilateral Donors’ Aid Allocation Decisions—A Three-Dimensional Panel Analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 13(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2003.11.004
Bigsten, A., & Tengstam, S. (2015). International Coordination and the Effectiveness of Aid. World Development, 69, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.021
Black, L. D. (1968). The Strategy of Foreign Aid. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Blätte, A., Gehlhar, S., Gehrmann, J., Niederberger, A., Rakers, J., & Weiler, E. (2019). Migrationspolitik im Bundestagswahlkampf 2017: Die Kluft zwischen Entscheidungs- und Darstellungspolitik [Migration Policy in the 2017 Federal Election Campaign: The Gap Between Decision-Making and Representation Policy]. In K.-R. Korte & J. Schoofs (Eds.), Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Analysen der Wahl-, Parteien-, Kommunikations- und Regierungsforschung [The 2017 Bundestag Election: Analyses of Election, Party, Communication, and Government Research] (pp. 363–387). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
103
BMVg. (2020). Einsätze in Afrika [Missions in Africa]. Bundesministerium der Verteidigung [Federal Ministry of Defense]. https://www.bmvg.de/de/themen/dossiers/engagement-in-afrika/einsaetze-in-afrika
BMZ. (2015). Charter for the Future. Bonn: BMZ.39
https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23352/cc34f7f068fe560e333eacdf8f582762/materialie257-zukunftscharta-beitraege-data.pdf
BMZ. (2017). Entwicklungspolitik als Zukunfts- und Friedenspolitik: 15. Entwicklungspolitischer Bericht der Bundesregierung [Development Policy as Future and Peace Policy: 15th Development Policy Report of the Federal Government]. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23398/044e414070cd9b80f5eb597443a9044 7/materialie319-entwicklungspolitischer-bericht-data.pdf
BMZ. (2018). Development Policy 2030: New Challenges—New Solutions. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23770/71cf4bb9fee375d369a42c1abf29b64d/Strategiepapier452_development%20policy%202030
BMZ. (2020a). Bilaterale Netto-ODA nach Förderbereichen und Ländern 2018 [Bilateral Net ODA by Funding Areas and Countries 2018]. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/28994/ea4e1537ed8c89122b5fc6e1cae3b827/3_D7_Bilaterale_Netto_ODA_nach_Foerderbereichen_und_Laendern_2018.pdf
BMZ. (2020b). Entwicklungsministerium legt mit “BMZ 2030” Reformkonzept vor [Development Ministry Presents "BMZ 2030" Reform Concept]. http://www.bmz.de/de/presse/aktuelleMeldungen/2020/april/200429_pm_09_Entwicklungsministerium-legt-mit-BMZ-2030-Reformkonzept-vor/index.html
BMZ. (2020c). BMZ 2030 Reform Strategy: New Thinking—New Direction. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/29026/a73123a6094263264e921881d6b76f90/Materialie520_BMZ%202030%20reform%20strategy
39 The URL provided refers to the German version of the document, as the English copy is not available online anymore. The English version can be provided at request.
104
BMZ. (2021a). Ausschuss für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (AwZ) [Committee for Economic Cooperation and Development (AwZ)]. https://www.bmz.de/de/service/glossar/A/ausschuss_awz.html
BMZ. (2021b). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) [German Corporation for International Cooperation (GIZ)]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/wege/bilaterale_ez/akteure_ez/einzelakteure/giz/index.html
BMZ. (2021c). KfW Entwicklungsbank [KfW Development Bank]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/wege/bilaterale_ez/akteure_ez/einzelakteure/kfw/index.html
BMZ. (2021d). Leitung des Ministeriums - Dr. Gerd Müller [Head of the Ministry - Dr. Gerd Müller]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/mueller-8692
BMZ. (2021e). Ministerium - Aufbau und Organisation [Ministry - Structure and Organization]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/aufbau/index.html#:~:text=Das%2 0Bundesministerium%20f%C3%BCr%20wirtschaftliche%20Zusammenarbeit,%C3%BCbrigen%2046%20Prozent%20in%20Berlin.
Bohnet, M. (2017). Politische Ökonomie der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Bestimmungsgründe, Akteure und Allokationsmuster [Political Economy of German Development Cooperation: Determinants, Actors and Allocation Patterns], Discussion Paper, No. 20/2017. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199510
Bohnet, M. (2019). Geschichte der deutschen Entwicklungspolitik: Strategien, Innenansichten, Erfolge, Misserfolge, Zeitzeugen, Herausforderungen [History of German Development Policy: Strategies, Internal Views, Successes, Failures, Contemporary Witnesses, Challenges] (2nd ed.). Munich: UVK Verlag.
105
Bohnet, M., Klingebiel, S., & Marschall, P. (2018). Die Struktur der deutschen öffentlichen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Hintergründe, Trends und Implikationen für das BMZ und andere Bundesressorts [The Structure of German Official Development Cooperation: Background, Trends, and Implications for the BMZ and Other Federal Departments], Discussion Paper, No. 15/2018. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_15.2018.pdf
Boone, P. (1996). Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid. European Economic Review, 40(2), 289–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00127-1
Bundesregierung. (2019). Deutscher Bundestag—Drucksache 19/13352—Antwort der Bundesregierung [Federal Parliament - Print Matter 19/13352 - Response of the Federal Government]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/19/133/1913352.pdf
Bundesregierung. (2021). Angela Merkel—Biografie [Angela Merkel - Biography]. Bundesregierung [Federal Government].
https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/biografie
Bundeswahlleiter. (2013). Endgültiges amtliches Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2013 [Final Official Result of the 2013 Federal Election]. Bundeswahlleiter [Federal Election Commissioner]. https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/info/presse/mitteilungen/bundestagswahl-2013/2013-10-09-endgueltiges-amtliches-ergebnis-der-bundestagswahl-2013.html
Bundeswahlleiter. (2017). Bundestagswahl 2017: Endgültiges Ergebnis [2017 Federal Election: Final Result]. Bundeswahlleiter [Federal Election Commissioner]. https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/info/presse/mitteilungen/bundestagswahl-2017/34_17_endgueltiges_ergebnis.html
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. (2018). Erneut nur schöne Worte statt Tatkraft—Minister Müller fällt durch den Realitätscheck [Once Again Only Nice Words Instead of Action - Minister Müller Fails Reality Check]. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen [Alliance 90/The Greens].
https://www.gruene-bundestag.de/presse/presse mitteilungen/erneut-nur-schoene-wort e-statt-tatkraft-minister-mueller-faellt-durch-den-realitaetscheck
106
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. (2020). Strukturreform 2030 mit neuer Länderliste [Structural Reform 2030 With New Country List]. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen [Alliance 90/The Greens].
https://www.gruene-bundestag.de/themen/entwicklungszusammenarbeit/strukturrefor m-2030-mit-neuer-laenderliste
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Nunnenkamp, P., Thiele, R., & Triveño, L. (2006). Assessing the Allocation of Aid: Developmental Concerns and the Self-Interest of Donors. The Indian Economic Journal, 54(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019466220060103
Carey, S. C. (2007). European Aid: Human Rights Versus Bureaucratic Inertia? Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078938
CDU, CSU, SPD. (2013). Deutschlands Zukunft Gestalten—Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD [Shaping Germany`s Future - Coalition Contract between CDU, CSU and SPD]. Berlin: CDU, CSU, SPD. https://archiv.cdu.de/sites/default/files/media/dokumente/koalitionsvertrag.pdf
CDU, CSU, SPD. (2018). Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa—Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland—Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land—Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD [A New Departure for Europe – A New Dynamic for Germany – A New Cohesion for Our Country - Coalition Contract between CDU, CSU and SPD]. Berlin: CDU, CSU, SPD. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/koalitionsv ertrag-zwischen-cdu-csu-und-spd-195906
Chauvet, L. (2002). Socio-Political Instability and the Allocation of International Aid by Donors. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00128-3
Claessens, S., Cassimon, D., & Van Campenhout, B. (2009). Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria. World Bank Economic Review, 23(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp003
Clist, P. (2009). 25 Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Comparing Donors and Eras, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 09/11. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/09-11.pdf
107
Collier, P. (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Collier, P., & Dollar, D. (2002). Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1475–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00187-8
Conrad, S. (2012). German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Davenport, M. (1970). The Allocation of Foreign Aid: A Cross Section Study, With Special Reference to the Pearson Commission Report. Bulletin of Economic Research, 22(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1970.tb00053.x
Deutscher Bundestag. (2014). Plenarprotokoll 18/10—Stenografischer Bericht 10. Sitzung [Plenary Record 18/10 - Stenographic Report 10th Session]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18010.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2018a). Plenarprotokoll 19/41—Stenografischer Bericht 41. Sitzung [Plenary Record 19/41 - Stenographic Report 41st Session]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/19/19041.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2018b). Plenarprotokoll 19/54—Stenografischer Bericht 54. Sitzung [Plenary Record 19/54 - Stenographic Report 54th Session]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/19/19054.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2020). Deutscher Bundestag—Drucksache 19/20436 [Federal Parliament - Print Matter 19/20436]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btd/19/204/1920436.pdf
Dietrich, S. (2013). Bypass or Engage? Explaining Donor Delivery Tactics in Foreign Aid Allocation. International Studies Quarterly, 57(4), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12041
DistanceFromTo. (2021). Distance Between Cities on Map.
https://www.distancefromto.net/
Dollar, D., & Levin, V. (2006). The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2003. World Development, 34(12), 2034–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.06.002
108
Donor Tracker. (2020). Donor Tracker—Germany. https://donortracker.org/country/germany
Dowling, J. M., & Hiemenz, U. (1985). Biases in the Allocation of Foreign Aid: Some New Evidence. World Development, 13(4), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90055-5
Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P., & Schmaljohann, M. (2015). The Allocation of German Aid: Self‐Interest and Government Ideology. Economics & Politics, 27(1), 160–184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12053
Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P., Thiel, S., & Thiele, R. (2012). Aid Allocation by German NGOs: Does the Degree of Official Financing Matter? The World Economy, 35(11), 1448–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01455.x
Dumke, H. (1997). Anfänge der deutschen staatlichen Entwicklungspolitik: Eine Korrektur des politischen Bildes [Beginnings of German State Development Policy: A Correction of the Political Image]. Sankt Augustin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
Eberstadt, N. (1988). Foreign Aid and American Purpose. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Engel, S. (2017). Germany’s Government-Civil Society Development Cooperation Strategy: The Dangers of the Middle of the Road. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i1.4942
Faust, J. (2011). Donor Transparency and Aid Allocation, Discussion Paper, No. 12/2011. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).
https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_12.2011.pdf
Faust, J., & Ziaja, S. (2012). German Aid Allocation and Partner Country Selection: Development-Orientation, Self-Interests and Path Dependency, Discussion Paper, No. 7/2012. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_7.2012.pdf
Flahaux, M.-L., & De Haas, H. (2016). African Migration: Trends, Patterns, Drivers. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-015-0015-6
109
Gates, S., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Global Aid Allocation: Are Nordic Donors Different? - CSAE Working Paper 2004-34. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/2004-34text.pdf
Gibney, M., Cornett, L., Wood, R., Haschke, P., Arnon, D., Pisanò, A., Barrett, G., & Park, B. (2020). The Political Terror Scale 1976-2019. http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/Data/Download.html
Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy, WIDER Working Paper, No. 2012/30. The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81039/1/688432662.pdf
GIZ. (n.d.). Profil: Im Einsatz für nachhaltige Entwicklung [Profile: On Mission for Sustainable Development].
https://www.giz.de/de/ueber_die_giz/1689.html
Glennie, J., & Sumner, A. (2016). Aid, Growth and Poverty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gulrajani, N. (2011). Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate: Managerialism, Radicalism and the Search for Aid Effectiveness. Third World Quarterly, 32(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.560465
Hattori, T. (2001). Reconceptualizing Foreign Aid. Review of International Political Economy, 8(4), 633–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110077610
Hoeffler, A., & Outram, V. (2011). Need, Merit, or Self-Interest—What Determines the Allocation of Aid? Review of Development Economics, 15(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00605.x
Hook, S. W. (1995). National Interest and Foreign Aid. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Huntington, S. P. (1970). Foreign Aid for What and for Whom. Foreign Policy, 1, 161–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1147894
110
Jolly, R. (2007). Inequality in Historical Perspective. In G. Mavrotas & A. Shorrocks (Eds.), Advancing Development: Core Themes in Global Economics (pp. 63–73). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kassar, H., & Dourgnon, P. (2014). The Big Crossing: Illegal Boat Migrants in the Mediterranean. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku099
Kevenhörster, P., & Boom, D. van den. (2009). Entwicklungspolitik [Development Policy]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
KfW. (2021). KfW - Impressum and Disclaimer [KfW - Imprint and Disclaimer]. https://www.kfw.de/KfW-Konzern/Impressum.html
Klees, S. J. (2010). Aid, Development, and Education. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 13(1), 7–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ934760.pdf
Knorr, K. (1973). Power and Wealth: The Political Economy of International Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Korte, K.-R. (2019). Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Ein Plebiszit über die Flüchtlingspolitik [The 2017 Federal Election: A Plebiscite on Refugee Policy]. In K.-R. Korte & J. Schoofs (Eds.), Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Analysen der Wahl-, Parteien-, Kommunikations- und Regierungsforschung [The 2017 Bundestag Election: Analyses of Election, Party, Communication, and Government Research] (pp. 1–19). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Kropp, S., & Sturm, R. (1998). Koalitionen und Koalitionsvereinbarungen: Theorie, Analyse und Dokumentation [Coalitions and Coalition Agreements: Theory, Analysis and Documentation]. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A Theory of Migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063
Lensink, R., & White, H. (2000). Aid Allocation, Poverty Reduction and the Assessing Aid Report. Journal of International Development, 12(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200004)12%3A3%3C399%3A%3AAID-JID658%3E3.0.CO%3B2-5
111
Liska, G. (1960). The New Statecraft—Foreign Aid in American Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, T., McGillivray, M., Morrissey, O., & Osei, R. (2000). Does Aid Create Trade? An Investigation for European Donors and African Recipients. The European Journal of Development Research, 12(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810008426754
Maizels, A., & Nissanke, M. K. (1984). Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries. World Development, 12(9), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(84)90046-9
Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Klasen, S., & Johannsen, F. (2016). Does German Development Aid Boost German Exports and German Employment? A Sectoral Level Analysis. Journal of Economics and Statistics, 236(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2015-1003
Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, F., Klasen, S., & Larch, M. (2009). Does German Development Aid Promote German Exports? German Economic Review, 10(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00458.x
Maurits van der Veen, A. (2011). Ideas, interests and Foreign Aid. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McGillivray, M. (1989). The Allocation of Aid Among Developing Countries: A Multi-Donor Analysis Using a per Capita Aid Index. World Development, 17(4), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90262-3
McKinlay, R. D. (1978). The German Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models of the Distribution of German Bilateral Aid 1961-70. European Journal of Political Research, 6, 235–257.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1978.tb01259.x
McKinlay, R. D. (1979). The Aid Relationship: A Foreign Policy Model and Interpretation of the Distributions of Official Bilateral Economic Aid of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, 1960–1970. Comparative Political Studies, 11(4), 411–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407901100401
Messner, D. (2011). Entwicklungspolitik als globale Strukturpolitik [Development Policy as Global Structural Policy]. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (Eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik [German Foreign Policy] (2nd ed., pp. 414–442). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
112
Mlambo, C., Kushamba, A., & Simawu, M. B. (2016). China-Africa Relations: What Lies Beneath? The Chinese Economy, 49(4), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2016.1179023
Moreira da Silva, J. (2018). Germany Mid-term Review. Paris: OECD Development Assistance Committee. https://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/Germany-2018-Mid-term-review.pdf
Morgenthau, H. (1962). A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. The American Political Science Review, 56(2), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952366
MPI. (2019a). Immigrant and Emigrant Populations by Country of Origin and Destination, mid-2019 Estimates. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/immigrant-and-emigrant-populations-country-origin-and-destination?width=1000&height=850&iframe=true
MPI. (2019b). International Migrant Population and Migrant Share of Total Population, Top 25 Countries of Destination, 2010. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/top-25-destinations-international-migrants
Neumayer, E. (2003). Do Human Rights Matter in Bilateral Aid Allocation? A Quantitative Analysis of 21 Donor Countries. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8403010
Niedermayer, O. (2017). Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Ein schwarzer Tag für die Volksparteien [The 2017 Federal Election: A Dark Day for the Mainstream Parties]. GWP – Gesellschaft. Wirtschaft. Politik, 4, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.3224/gwp.v66i4.01
Noel, A., & Therien, J.-P. (1995). From Domestic to International Justice: The Welfare State and Foreign Aid. International Organization, 49(3), 523–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033373
Nowak-Lehmann, F., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Klasen, S., & Herzer, D. (2009). Aid and Trade – A Donor’s Perspective. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1184–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902952407
113
Nunnenkamp, P., & Öhler, H. (2011). Aid Allocation through Various Official and Private Channels: Need, Merit, and Self-Interest as Motives of German Donors. World Development, 39(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.001
Nuscheler, F. (2007). Entwicklungspolitik [Development Policy]. In S. Schmidt, G. Hellmann, & R. Wolf (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Außenpolitik [Dictionary of German Foreign Policy] (pp. 672–683). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
OECD. (2005). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/paris-declaration-on-aid-effectiveness_97 89264098084-en?_ga=2.32424568.752844201.1624793301-1290511866.1591002787
OECD. (2020). Aid by DAC members increases in 2019 with more aid to the poorest countries. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/ODA-2019-detailed-summary.pdf
OECD. (2021a). ODA disbursements to countries and regions [DAC2a]. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=TABLE2A
OECD. (2021b). OECD iLibrary—Development Co-operation Profiles—Germany. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/0079f636-en/index.html?itemId=/content/compone nt/5e331623-en&_csp_=b14d4f60505d057b456dd1730d8fcea3&itemIGO=oecd&item ContentType=chapter
Pankaj, A. K. (2005). Revisiting Foreign Aid Theories. International Studies, 42(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170404200201
Riddell, R. C. (2007). Does Foreign Aid Really Work? New York: Oxford University Press.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068
Scholz, I. (2014). BMZ Charter for the Future – New Development Goals, The Current Column of 24 November 2014. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/German_Development_Institute_Scholz_24.11. 2014.pdf
114
Scholz, I., Keijzer, N., & Richerzhagen, C. (2016). Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in Germany, Discussion Paper, No. 13/2016. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_13.2016.pdf
Schraeder, P. J., Hook, S. W., & Taylor, B. (1998). Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows. World Politics, 50(2), 294–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008121
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2020). Foreign Trade Ranking of Germany’s Trading Partners in Foreign Trade (Preliminary Results) 2019. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.40
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2021a). 12521-0002: Ausländer: Deutschland, Stichtag, Geschlecht/Altersjahre/Familienstand, Ländergruppierungen/Staatsangehörigkeit [12521-0002: Foreigners: Germany, Reference Date, Sex/Age/Marital Status, Country Groupings/Citizenship]. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office]. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/ge nesis/online?operation=previous&levelindex=1&st ep=1&titel=Tabellenaufbau&levelid=1622532233771&acceptscookies=false#abreadcrumb
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2021b). 51000-0003: Aus- und Einfuhr (Außenhandel): Deutschland, Jahre, Länder [51000-0003: Exports and Imports (Foreign Trade): Germany, Years, Countries]. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office]. https://www-genesis.destatis. de/genesis/online?operation=table&code=51000-0003&bypass=true&levelindex=0&l evelid=1621363186326#abreadcrumb
Sturm, R. (2014). Die Regierungsbildung nach der Bundestagswahl 2013: Lagerübergreifend und langwierig [The Government Formation After the 2013 Federal Election: Cross-Camp and Protracted]. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 45(1), 207–230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24242771
Svensson, J. (1999). Aid, Growth and Democracy. Economics & Politics, 11(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00062
40 The document is not available online anymore. It can be provided at request.
115
Thurich, E. (2011). Pocket Politik: Demokratie in Deutschland [Pocket Politics: Democracy in Germany] (4th ed.). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Todaro, M. P. (1969). A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811100
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2015). Economic Development (12th Edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2018/index/dnk
UNCTAD. (2021a). UN list of least developed countries.
https://unctad.org/topic/least-developed-countries/list
UNCTAD. (2021b). UN recognition of the least developed countries. https://unctad.org/topic/least-developed-countries/recognition#:~:text=Six%20countrie s%20have%20so%20far,toward%20graduation%20from%20LDC%20status.
UNDP. (2019a). Human Development Report 2019. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf
UNDP. (2019b). The 2019 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). New York: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.
http://hdr.undp.org/en/2019-MPI
UNDP. (2020a). Human Development Index (HDI).
http://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/137506
UNDP. (2020b). Human Development Index (HDI) - Data Center. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
United Nations. (2021). LDCs at a Glance. United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/least-developed-country-category/ldcs-at-a-glance.html
116
Varieties of Democracy. (2021). V-Dem Dataset—Version 11.1.
https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data/v-dem-dataset-v111/
WHO. (2019). World hunger is still not going down after three years and obesity is still growing – UN report. https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2019-world-hunger-is-still-not-going-down-after-three-years-and-obesity-is-still-growing-un-report
Wohlforth, W. C. (2008). Realism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0007
Woods, N. (2008). Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance. International Affairs, 84(6), 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00765.x
Worbs, S., Rother, N., & Kreienbrink, A. (2019). Syrische Migranten in Deutschland als bedeutsame neue Bevölkerungsgruppe [Syrian Migrants in Germany as a Significant New Population Group]. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren, 61, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.15464/isi.61.2019.2-6
World Bank. (2014). Poverty and Health. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/health/brief/poverty-health
World Bank. (2019). Accelerating Poverty Reduction in Africa: In Five Charts. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/afr/publication/accelerating-poverty-reduction-in-africa-in-five-charts
World Bank. (2021a). Data Catalog—Rule of Law: Estimate. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/rule-law-estimate
World Bank. (2021b). Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)—Germany. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS?locations=DE
World Bank. (2021c). Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN
World Bank. (2021d). Primary education, pupils. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.ENRL
117
World Bank. (2021e). World Development Indicators. World Bank DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
World Bank. (2021f). World Governance Indicators. World Bank DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators
Woyke, W. (2020). Koaltion [Coalition]. In U. Andersen, J. Bogumil, S. Marschall, & W. Woyke (Eds.), Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Dictionary of the Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23670-0_67-1
Younas, J. (2008). Motivation for Bilateral Aid Allocation: Altruism or Trade Benefits. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 661–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.05.003
Zanger, S. C. (2000). Good Governance and European Aid: The Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics, 1(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001003002
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
108862007
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108862007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 劉曉鵬zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Liu, Philip Hsiaopongen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鹿西蒙zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Reh, Simon Philippen_US
dc.creator (作者) 鹿西蒙zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Reh, Simon Philippen_US
dc.date (日期) 2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Aug-2021 16:29:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Aug-2021 16:29:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Aug-2021 16:29:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108862007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136695-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 108862007zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) I am not able to write my abstract in Chinese.zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis uses a mixed-method approach to examine the underlying priorities of German development assistance to African countries. It pitches the self-interested motives of facilitating trade and curbing migration from the continent against the more altruistic goals of contributing to development, alleviating poverty and fostering good governance. The qualitative part of this study includes a presentation of the structure of the German aid regime and examines four key policy documents from the 18th and 19th legislative periods, covering the time spans from late 2013 to 2018 and 2018 to 2021, respectively. In the quantitative part, the four different motives are operationalized through several variables and tested against German aid flows by employing regression analysis. The data covers the entire 18th legislative period and the first half of the 19th legislative period. The qualitative examination shows that trade and migration are considered more relevant to foreign aid by the German policymakers in the 19th legislative period than they were in previous years. Poverty and development appear to have become slightly less relevant over time. The rule of law and democracy in recipient states are addressed over the whole time period, but the protection of human rights appears like a much higher priority. The quantitative analysis indicates that states with a higher population residing in Germany in fact do receive more aid, while the geographical distance from their home country to Germany seems to be irrelevant in the more recent years. Furthermore, it finds that German exports appear to be positively correlated with aid. Surprisingly, the measures employed to account for the development orientation of German aid are all insignificant. Moreover, democracy is the only dimension of good governance that appears to influence German aid allocation. Insofar, this thesis concludes that self-interested motives dominate over the altruistic ones. This practice may be explained by the realist theory of international relations. The results put the rhetoric of the German policymakers in question and may be an indication for German aid being inefficient when it comes to the promotion of development, good governance and the eradication of poverty in recipient countries.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... VII
List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ VIII
List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................... IX
Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1
I) Background ......................................................................................................................... 1
II) Research Objective ............................................................................................................ 3
1) Formal Development Policy ........................................................................................... 3
2) Possible Mismatches with Quantitative Data ................................................................. 4
3) Contribution and Research Question .............................................................................. 5
III) Theoretical Background and Methodology ...................................................................... 5
1) The Realist Prediction .................................................................................................... 5
2) Methodological Framework and Time Frame ................................................................ 6
IV) Research Outline .............................................................................................................. 7
Chapter 2: Literature Review ................................................................................................. 9
I) The Realist View on Foreign Aid ....................................................................................... 9
1) Aid in the National Interest ............................................................................................ 9
2) Developmental and Humanitarian Aspects .................................................................. 10
II) General Patterns of Aid Allocation ................................................................................. 11
1) Recipient Need ............................................................................................................. 12
2) Good Governance ......................................................................................................... 14
3) Commercial Interests .................................................................................................... 15
4) Foreign Policy Interests ................................................................................................ 17
5) Recipient Population ..................................................................................................... 18
6) Aid Effectiveness .......................................................................................................... 19
III) Trends in German Aid Allocation .................................................................................. 20
1) Recipient Need ............................................................................................................. 20
2) Good Governance ......................................................................................................... 22
3) Commercial Interests .................................................................................................... 23
4) Foreign Policy Interests ................................................................................................ 25
5) Recipient Population ..................................................................................................... 27
IV) Reflection of the Literature ............................................................................................ 27
V
Chapter 3: The German Aid Regime ................................................................................... 30
I) A Brief History of German Aid ........................................................................................ 30
II) The Current Aid Regime ................................................................................................. 33
1) The BMZ and Other Political Actors............................................................................ 34
2) Budget, Goals and Priorities ......................................................................................... 35
3) Implementation Organizations...................................................................................... 37
III) Aid Figures and Recipients ............................................................................................ 38
IV) Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 46
Chapter 4: Policy Document Analysis - What Do They Claim? ........................................ 48
I) The 18th Legislative Period, 2013-2018 ........................................................................... 48
1) Coalition Agreement of the 18th Legislative Period .................................................... 48
a) German Coalition Agreements .................................................................................. 48
b) Background and Structure ......................................................................................... 49
c) General Aid Policy and Relations with Africa .......................................................... 50
d) Aspects of Interest ..................................................................................................... 51
e) Findings ..................................................................................................................... 56
2) The Charter for the Future ............................................................................................ 57
a) Creation and Characteristics ..................................................................................... 57
b) A Broad Concept of Development Policy ................................................................ 58
c) Aspects of Interest ..................................................................................................... 59
d) Findings ..................................................................................................................... 62
II) The 19th Legislative Period, 2018-2021 ......................................................................... 63
1) Coalition Agreement of the 19th Legislative Period .................................................... 63
a) Background and Structure ......................................................................................... 64
b) General Aid Policy and Relations with Africa ......................................................... 65
c) Aspects of Interest ..................................................................................................... 66
d) Findings ..................................................................................................................... 70
2) Development Policy 2030 ............................................................................................ 72
a) Background, Characteristics and Structure ............................................................... 72
b) General Concept and the Role of Africa ................................................................... 72
c) Aspects of Interest ..................................................................................................... 73
d) Findings ..................................................................................................................... 77
III) Results ............................................................................................................................ 79
VI
Chapter 5: Quantitative Analysis - What Do They Actually Do? ...................................... 81
I) Hypotheses ........................................................................................................................ 81
II) Methodology .................................................................................................................... 82
1) Model ............................................................................................................................ 82
2) Variables ....................................................................................................................... 82
a) Dependent Variable ................................................................................................... 82
b) Key Independent Variables ....................................................................................... 83
c) Control Variables ...................................................................................................... 85
III) Results ............................................................................................................................ 88
IV) Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 90
1) Reflection on the Findings ............................................................................................ 90
2) Result ............................................................................................................................ 95
3) Limitations .................................................................................................................... 96
4) Possibilities for Future Research .................................................................................. 96
Chapter 6: Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 99
References ............................................................................................................................. 101		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1884806 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108862007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外援zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 德國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 移民zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 貿易zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 良好的治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Foreign Aiden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Germanyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Migrationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tradeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Good Governanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 德國對非洲的雙向援助zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Bilateral Development Aid to Africa - The Case of Germanyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874203400
Alesina, A., & Weder, B. (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344669
Andersen, U. (2020). Entwicklungspolitik [Development Policy]. In U. Andersen, J. Bogumil, S. Marschall, & W. Woyke (Eds.), Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Dictionary of the Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23670-0_43-1
Arvin, M., Cater, B., & Choudhry, S. (2000). A Causality Analysis of Untied Foreign Assistance and Export Performance: The Case of Germany. Applied Economics Letters, 7(5), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048500351465
Arvin, M., & Drewes, T. (2001). Are There Biases in German Bilateral Aid Allocations. Applied Economics Letters, 8(3), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850150504540
Ashoff, G. (2009). Institutioneller Reformbedarf in der bilateralen staatlichen deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, Analysen und Stellungnahmen, No. 8/2009 [Institutional Reform Needs in German Bilateral ODA, Analyses and Comments, No. 8/2009]. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/AuS_8.2009.pdf
Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2006). ‘Between a Rock & A Hard Place’: North Africa as a Region of Emigration, Immigration & Transit Migration. Review of African Political Economy, 33(108), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240600843089
102
Baydag, R. M., Klingebiel, S., & Marschall, P. (2018). Shaping the Patterns of Aid Allocation: A Comparative Analysis of Seven Bilateral Donors and the European Union, Discussion Paper, No. 22/2018. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_22.2018.pdf
Berger, H., & Ritschl, A. (1995). Germany and the Political Economy of the Marshall Plan, 1947-52: A Re-Revisionist View. In B. Eichengreen (Ed.), Europe’s Post-War Recovery (pp. 199–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bermeo, S. (2017). Aid Allocation and Targeted Development in an Increasingly Connected World. International Organization, 71(4), 735–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000315
Bermeo, S., & Leblang, D. (2015). Migration and Foreign Aid. International Organization, 69(3), 627–657. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000119
Berthélemy, J.-C. (2006). Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics, 10(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00311.x
Berthélemy, J.-C., & Tichit, A. (2004). Bilateral Donors’ Aid Allocation Decisions—A Three-Dimensional Panel Analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 13(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2003.11.004
Bigsten, A., & Tengstam, S. (2015). International Coordination and the Effectiveness of Aid. World Development, 69, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.021
Black, L. D. (1968). The Strategy of Foreign Aid. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Blätte, A., Gehlhar, S., Gehrmann, J., Niederberger, A., Rakers, J., & Weiler, E. (2019). Migrationspolitik im Bundestagswahlkampf 2017: Die Kluft zwischen Entscheidungs- und Darstellungspolitik [Migration Policy in the 2017 Federal Election Campaign: The Gap Between Decision-Making and Representation Policy]. In K.-R. Korte & J. Schoofs (Eds.), Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Analysen der Wahl-, Parteien-, Kommunikations- und Regierungsforschung [The 2017 Bundestag Election: Analyses of Election, Party, Communication, and Government Research] (pp. 363–387). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
103
BMVg. (2020). Einsätze in Afrika [Missions in Africa]. Bundesministerium der Verteidigung [Federal Ministry of Defense]. https://www.bmvg.de/de/themen/dossiers/engagement-in-afrika/einsaetze-in-afrika
BMZ. (2015). Charter for the Future. Bonn: BMZ.39
https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23352/cc34f7f068fe560e333eacdf8f582762/materialie257-zukunftscharta-beitraege-data.pdf
BMZ. (2017). Entwicklungspolitik als Zukunfts- und Friedenspolitik: 15. Entwicklungspolitischer Bericht der Bundesregierung [Development Policy as Future and Peace Policy: 15th Development Policy Report of the Federal Government]. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23398/044e414070cd9b80f5eb597443a9044 7/materialie319-entwicklungspolitischer-bericht-data.pdf
BMZ. (2018). Development Policy 2030: New Challenges—New Solutions. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23770/71cf4bb9fee375d369a42c1abf29b64d/Strategiepapier452_development%20policy%202030
BMZ. (2020a). Bilaterale Netto-ODA nach Förderbereichen und Ländern 2018 [Bilateral Net ODA by Funding Areas and Countries 2018]. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/28994/ea4e1537ed8c89122b5fc6e1cae3b827/3_D7_Bilaterale_Netto_ODA_nach_Foerderbereichen_und_Laendern_2018.pdf
BMZ. (2020b). Entwicklungsministerium legt mit “BMZ 2030” Reformkonzept vor [Development Ministry Presents "BMZ 2030" Reform Concept]. http://www.bmz.de/de/presse/aktuelleMeldungen/2020/april/200429_pm_09_Entwicklungsministerium-legt-mit-BMZ-2030-Reformkonzept-vor/index.html
BMZ. (2020c). BMZ 2030 Reform Strategy: New Thinking—New Direction. Bonn: BMZ. https://www.bmz.de/resource/blob/29026/a73123a6094263264e921881d6b76f90/Materialie520_BMZ%202030%20reform%20strategy
39 The URL provided refers to the German version of the document, as the English copy is not available online anymore. The English version can be provided at request.
104
BMZ. (2021a). Ausschuss für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (AwZ) [Committee for Economic Cooperation and Development (AwZ)]. https://www.bmz.de/de/service/glossar/A/ausschuss_awz.html
BMZ. (2021b). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) [German Corporation for International Cooperation (GIZ)]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/wege/bilaterale_ez/akteure_ez/einzelakteure/giz/index.html
BMZ. (2021c). KfW Entwicklungsbank [KfW Development Bank]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/wege/bilaterale_ez/akteure_ez/einzelakteure/kfw/index.html
BMZ. (2021d). Leitung des Ministeriums - Dr. Gerd Müller [Head of the Ministry - Dr. Gerd Müller]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/mueller-8692
BMZ. (2021e). Ministerium - Aufbau und Organisation [Ministry - Structure and Organization]. https://www.bmz.de/de/ministerium/aufbau/index.html#:~:text=Das%2 0Bundesministerium%20f%C3%BCr%20wirtschaftliche%20Zusammenarbeit,%C3%BCbrigen%2046%20Prozent%20in%20Berlin.
Bohnet, M. (2017). Politische Ökonomie der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Bestimmungsgründe, Akteure und Allokationsmuster [Political Economy of German Development Cooperation: Determinants, Actors and Allocation Patterns], Discussion Paper, No. 20/2017. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199510
Bohnet, M. (2019). Geschichte der deutschen Entwicklungspolitik: Strategien, Innenansichten, Erfolge, Misserfolge, Zeitzeugen, Herausforderungen [History of German Development Policy: Strategies, Internal Views, Successes, Failures, Contemporary Witnesses, Challenges] (2nd ed.). Munich: UVK Verlag.
105
Bohnet, M., Klingebiel, S., & Marschall, P. (2018). Die Struktur der deutschen öffentlichen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Hintergründe, Trends und Implikationen für das BMZ und andere Bundesressorts [The Structure of German Official Development Cooperation: Background, Trends, and Implications for the BMZ and Other Federal Departments], Discussion Paper, No. 15/2018. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_15.2018.pdf
Boone, P. (1996). Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid. European Economic Review, 40(2), 289–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00127-1
Bundesregierung. (2019). Deutscher Bundestag—Drucksache 19/13352—Antwort der Bundesregierung [Federal Parliament - Print Matter 19/13352 - Response of the Federal Government]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/19/133/1913352.pdf
Bundesregierung. (2021). Angela Merkel—Biografie [Angela Merkel - Biography]. Bundesregierung [Federal Government].
https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/biografie
Bundeswahlleiter. (2013). Endgültiges amtliches Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2013 [Final Official Result of the 2013 Federal Election]. Bundeswahlleiter [Federal Election Commissioner]. https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/info/presse/mitteilungen/bundestagswahl-2013/2013-10-09-endgueltiges-amtliches-ergebnis-der-bundestagswahl-2013.html
Bundeswahlleiter. (2017). Bundestagswahl 2017: Endgültiges Ergebnis [2017 Federal Election: Final Result]. Bundeswahlleiter [Federal Election Commissioner]. https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/info/presse/mitteilungen/bundestagswahl-2017/34_17_endgueltiges_ergebnis.html
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. (2018). Erneut nur schöne Worte statt Tatkraft—Minister Müller fällt durch den Realitätscheck [Once Again Only Nice Words Instead of Action - Minister Müller Fails Reality Check]. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen [Alliance 90/The Greens].
https://www.gruene-bundestag.de/presse/presse mitteilungen/erneut-nur-schoene-wort e-statt-tatkraft-minister-mueller-faellt-durch-den-realitaetscheck
106
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. (2020). Strukturreform 2030 mit neuer Länderliste [Structural Reform 2030 With New Country List]. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen [Alliance 90/The Greens].
https://www.gruene-bundestag.de/themen/entwicklungszusammenarbeit/strukturrefor m-2030-mit-neuer-laenderliste
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Nunnenkamp, P., Thiele, R., & Triveño, L. (2006). Assessing the Allocation of Aid: Developmental Concerns and the Self-Interest of Donors. The Indian Economic Journal, 54(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019466220060103
Carey, S. C. (2007). European Aid: Human Rights Versus Bureaucratic Inertia? Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078938
CDU, CSU, SPD. (2013). Deutschlands Zukunft Gestalten—Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD [Shaping Germany`s Future - Coalition Contract between CDU, CSU and SPD]. Berlin: CDU, CSU, SPD. https://archiv.cdu.de/sites/default/files/media/dokumente/koalitionsvertrag.pdf
CDU, CSU, SPD. (2018). Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa—Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland—Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land—Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD [A New Departure for Europe – A New Dynamic for Germany – A New Cohesion for Our Country - Coalition Contract between CDU, CSU and SPD]. Berlin: CDU, CSU, SPD. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/koalitionsv ertrag-zwischen-cdu-csu-und-spd-195906
Chauvet, L. (2002). Socio-Political Instability and the Allocation of International Aid by Donors. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00128-3
Claessens, S., Cassimon, D., & Van Campenhout, B. (2009). Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria. World Bank Economic Review, 23(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp003
Clist, P. (2009). 25 Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Comparing Donors and Eras, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 09/11. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/09-11.pdf
107
Collier, P. (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Collier, P., & Dollar, D. (2002). Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1475–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00187-8
Conrad, S. (2012). German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Davenport, M. (1970). The Allocation of Foreign Aid: A Cross Section Study, With Special Reference to the Pearson Commission Report. Bulletin of Economic Research, 22(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1970.tb00053.x
Deutscher Bundestag. (2014). Plenarprotokoll 18/10—Stenografischer Bericht 10. Sitzung [Plenary Record 18/10 - Stenographic Report 10th Session]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btp/18/18010.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2018a). Plenarprotokoll 19/41—Stenografischer Bericht 41. Sitzung [Plenary Record 19/41 - Stenographic Report 41st Session]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/19/19041.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2018b). Plenarprotokoll 19/54—Stenografischer Bericht 54. Sitzung [Plenary Record 19/54 - Stenographic Report 54th Session]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/19/19054.pdf
Deutscher Bundestag. (2020). Deutscher Bundestag—Drucksache 19/20436 [Federal Parliament - Print Matter 19/20436]. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btd/19/204/1920436.pdf
Dietrich, S. (2013). Bypass or Engage? Explaining Donor Delivery Tactics in Foreign Aid Allocation. International Studies Quarterly, 57(4), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12041
DistanceFromTo. (2021). Distance Between Cities on Map.
https://www.distancefromto.net/
Dollar, D., & Levin, V. (2006). The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2003. World Development, 34(12), 2034–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.06.002
108
Donor Tracker. (2020). Donor Tracker—Germany. https://donortracker.org/country/germany
Dowling, J. M., & Hiemenz, U. (1985). Biases in the Allocation of Foreign Aid: Some New Evidence. World Development, 13(4), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90055-5
Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P., & Schmaljohann, M. (2015). The Allocation of German Aid: Self‐Interest and Government Ideology. Economics & Politics, 27(1), 160–184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12053
Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P., Thiel, S., & Thiele, R. (2012). Aid Allocation by German NGOs: Does the Degree of Official Financing Matter? The World Economy, 35(11), 1448–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01455.x
Dumke, H. (1997). Anfänge der deutschen staatlichen Entwicklungspolitik: Eine Korrektur des politischen Bildes [Beginnings of German State Development Policy: A Correction of the Political Image]. Sankt Augustin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
Eberstadt, N. (1988). Foreign Aid and American Purpose. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Engel, S. (2017). Germany’s Government-Civil Society Development Cooperation Strategy: The Dangers of the Middle of the Road. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i1.4942
Faust, J. (2011). Donor Transparency and Aid Allocation, Discussion Paper, No. 12/2011. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).
https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_12.2011.pdf
Faust, J., & Ziaja, S. (2012). German Aid Allocation and Partner Country Selection: Development-Orientation, Self-Interests and Path Dependency, Discussion Paper, No. 7/2012. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_7.2012.pdf
Flahaux, M.-L., & De Haas, H. (2016). African Migration: Trends, Patterns, Drivers. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-015-0015-6
109
Gates, S., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Global Aid Allocation: Are Nordic Donors Different? - CSAE Working Paper 2004-34. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/2004-34text.pdf
Gibney, M., Cornett, L., Wood, R., Haschke, P., Arnon, D., Pisanò, A., Barrett, G., & Park, B. (2020). The Political Terror Scale 1976-2019. http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/Data/Download.html
Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy, WIDER Working Paper, No. 2012/30. The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81039/1/688432662.pdf
GIZ. (n.d.). Profil: Im Einsatz für nachhaltige Entwicklung [Profile: On Mission for Sustainable Development].
https://www.giz.de/de/ueber_die_giz/1689.html
Glennie, J., & Sumner, A. (2016). Aid, Growth and Poverty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gulrajani, N. (2011). Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate: Managerialism, Radicalism and the Search for Aid Effectiveness. Third World Quarterly, 32(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.560465
Hattori, T. (2001). Reconceptualizing Foreign Aid. Review of International Political Economy, 8(4), 633–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110077610
Hoeffler, A., & Outram, V. (2011). Need, Merit, or Self-Interest—What Determines the Allocation of Aid? Review of Development Economics, 15(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00605.x
Hook, S. W. (1995). National Interest and Foreign Aid. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Huntington, S. P. (1970). Foreign Aid for What and for Whom. Foreign Policy, 1, 161–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1147894
110
Jolly, R. (2007). Inequality in Historical Perspective. In G. Mavrotas & A. Shorrocks (Eds.), Advancing Development: Core Themes in Global Economics (pp. 63–73). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kassar, H., & Dourgnon, P. (2014). The Big Crossing: Illegal Boat Migrants in the Mediterranean. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku099
Kevenhörster, P., & Boom, D. van den. (2009). Entwicklungspolitik [Development Policy]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
KfW. (2021). KfW - Impressum and Disclaimer [KfW - Imprint and Disclaimer]. https://www.kfw.de/KfW-Konzern/Impressum.html
Klees, S. J. (2010). Aid, Development, and Education. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 13(1), 7–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ934760.pdf
Knorr, K. (1973). Power and Wealth: The Political Economy of International Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Korte, K.-R. (2019). Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Ein Plebiszit über die Flüchtlingspolitik [The 2017 Federal Election: A Plebiscite on Refugee Policy]. In K.-R. Korte & J. Schoofs (Eds.), Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Analysen der Wahl-, Parteien-, Kommunikations- und Regierungsforschung [The 2017 Bundestag Election: Analyses of Election, Party, Communication, and Government Research] (pp. 1–19). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Kropp, S., & Sturm, R. (1998). Koalitionen und Koalitionsvereinbarungen: Theorie, Analyse und Dokumentation [Coalitions and Coalition Agreements: Theory, Analysis and Documentation]. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A Theory of Migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063
Lensink, R., & White, H. (2000). Aid Allocation, Poverty Reduction and the Assessing Aid Report. Journal of International Development, 12(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200004)12%3A3%3C399%3A%3AAID-JID658%3E3.0.CO%3B2-5
111
Liska, G. (1960). The New Statecraft—Foreign Aid in American Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, T., McGillivray, M., Morrissey, O., & Osei, R. (2000). Does Aid Create Trade? An Investigation for European Donors and African Recipients. The European Journal of Development Research, 12(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810008426754
Maizels, A., & Nissanke, M. K. (1984). Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries. World Development, 12(9), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(84)90046-9
Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Klasen, S., & Johannsen, F. (2016). Does German Development Aid Boost German Exports and German Employment? A Sectoral Level Analysis. Journal of Economics and Statistics, 236(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2015-1003
Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, F., Klasen, S., & Larch, M. (2009). Does German Development Aid Promote German Exports? German Economic Review, 10(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00458.x
Maurits van der Veen, A. (2011). Ideas, interests and Foreign Aid. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McGillivray, M. (1989). The Allocation of Aid Among Developing Countries: A Multi-Donor Analysis Using a per Capita Aid Index. World Development, 17(4), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90262-3
McKinlay, R. D. (1978). The German Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models of the Distribution of German Bilateral Aid 1961-70. European Journal of Political Research, 6, 235–257.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1978.tb01259.x
McKinlay, R. D. (1979). The Aid Relationship: A Foreign Policy Model and Interpretation of the Distributions of Official Bilateral Economic Aid of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, 1960–1970. Comparative Political Studies, 11(4), 411–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407901100401
Messner, D. (2011). Entwicklungspolitik als globale Strukturpolitik [Development Policy as Global Structural Policy]. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (Eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik [German Foreign Policy] (2nd ed., pp. 414–442). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
112
Mlambo, C., Kushamba, A., & Simawu, M. B. (2016). China-Africa Relations: What Lies Beneath? The Chinese Economy, 49(4), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2016.1179023
Moreira da Silva, J. (2018). Germany Mid-term Review. Paris: OECD Development Assistance Committee. https://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/Germany-2018-Mid-term-review.pdf
Morgenthau, H. (1962). A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. The American Political Science Review, 56(2), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952366
MPI. (2019a). Immigrant and Emigrant Populations by Country of Origin and Destination, mid-2019 Estimates. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/immigrant-and-emigrant-populations-country-origin-and-destination?width=1000&height=850&iframe=true
MPI. (2019b). International Migrant Population and Migrant Share of Total Population, Top 25 Countries of Destination, 2010. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/top-25-destinations-international-migrants
Neumayer, E. (2003). Do Human Rights Matter in Bilateral Aid Allocation? A Quantitative Analysis of 21 Donor Countries. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8403010
Niedermayer, O. (2017). Die Bundestagswahl 2017: Ein schwarzer Tag für die Volksparteien [The 2017 Federal Election: A Dark Day for the Mainstream Parties]. GWP – Gesellschaft. Wirtschaft. Politik, 4, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.3224/gwp.v66i4.01
Noel, A., & Therien, J.-P. (1995). From Domestic to International Justice: The Welfare State and Foreign Aid. International Organization, 49(3), 523–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033373
Nowak-Lehmann, F., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Klasen, S., & Herzer, D. (2009). Aid and Trade – A Donor’s Perspective. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1184–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902952407
113
Nunnenkamp, P., & Öhler, H. (2011). Aid Allocation through Various Official and Private Channels: Need, Merit, and Self-Interest as Motives of German Donors. World Development, 39(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.001
Nuscheler, F. (2007). Entwicklungspolitik [Development Policy]. In S. Schmidt, G. Hellmann, & R. Wolf (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Außenpolitik [Dictionary of German Foreign Policy] (pp. 672–683). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
OECD. (2005). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/paris-declaration-on-aid-effectiveness_97 89264098084-en?_ga=2.32424568.752844201.1624793301-1290511866.1591002787
OECD. (2020). Aid by DAC members increases in 2019 with more aid to the poorest countries. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/ODA-2019-detailed-summary.pdf
OECD. (2021a). ODA disbursements to countries and regions [DAC2a]. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=TABLE2A
OECD. (2021b). OECD iLibrary—Development Co-operation Profiles—Germany. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/0079f636-en/index.html?itemId=/content/compone nt/5e331623-en&_csp_=b14d4f60505d057b456dd1730d8fcea3&itemIGO=oecd&item ContentType=chapter
Pankaj, A. K. (2005). Revisiting Foreign Aid Theories. International Studies, 42(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170404200201
Riddell, R. C. (2007). Does Foreign Aid Really Work? New York: Oxford University Press.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068
Scholz, I. (2014). BMZ Charter for the Future – New Development Goals, The Current Column of 24 November 2014. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/German_Development_Institute_Scholz_24.11. 2014.pdf
114
Scholz, I., Keijzer, N., & Richerzhagen, C. (2016). Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in Germany, Discussion Paper, No. 13/2016. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_13.2016.pdf
Schraeder, P. J., Hook, S. W., & Taylor, B. (1998). Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows. World Politics, 50(2), 294–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008121
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2020). Foreign Trade Ranking of Germany’s Trading Partners in Foreign Trade (Preliminary Results) 2019. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.40
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2021a). 12521-0002: Ausländer: Deutschland, Stichtag, Geschlecht/Altersjahre/Familienstand, Ländergruppierungen/Staatsangehörigkeit [12521-0002: Foreigners: Germany, Reference Date, Sex/Age/Marital Status, Country Groupings/Citizenship]. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office]. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/ge nesis/online?operation=previous&levelindex=1&st ep=1&titel=Tabellenaufbau&levelid=1622532233771&acceptscookies=false#abreadcrumb
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2021b). 51000-0003: Aus- und Einfuhr (Außenhandel): Deutschland, Jahre, Länder [51000-0003: Exports and Imports (Foreign Trade): Germany, Years, Countries]. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office]. https://www-genesis.destatis. de/genesis/online?operation=table&code=51000-0003&bypass=true&levelindex=0&l evelid=1621363186326#abreadcrumb
Sturm, R. (2014). Die Regierungsbildung nach der Bundestagswahl 2013: Lagerübergreifend und langwierig [The Government Formation After the 2013 Federal Election: Cross-Camp and Protracted]. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 45(1), 207–230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24242771
Svensson, J. (1999). Aid, Growth and Democracy. Economics & Politics, 11(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00062
40 The document is not available online anymore. It can be provided at request.
115
Thurich, E. (2011). Pocket Politik: Demokratie in Deutschland [Pocket Politics: Democracy in Germany] (4th ed.). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Todaro, M. P. (1969). A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811100
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2015). Economic Development (12th Edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2018/index/dnk
UNCTAD. (2021a). UN list of least developed countries.
https://unctad.org/topic/least-developed-countries/list
UNCTAD. (2021b). UN recognition of the least developed countries. https://unctad.org/topic/least-developed-countries/recognition#:~:text=Six%20countrie s%20have%20so%20far,toward%20graduation%20from%20LDC%20status.
UNDP. (2019a). Human Development Report 2019. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf
UNDP. (2019b). The 2019 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). New York: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.
http://hdr.undp.org/en/2019-MPI
UNDP. (2020a). Human Development Index (HDI).
http://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/137506
UNDP. (2020b). Human Development Index (HDI) - Data Center. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
United Nations. (2021). LDCs at a Glance. United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/least-developed-country-category/ldcs-at-a-glance.html
116
Varieties of Democracy. (2021). V-Dem Dataset—Version 11.1.
https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data/v-dem-dataset-v111/
WHO. (2019). World hunger is still not going down after three years and obesity is still growing – UN report. https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2019-world-hunger-is-still-not-going-down-after-three-years-and-obesity-is-still-growing-un-report
Wohlforth, W. C. (2008). Realism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0007
Woods, N. (2008). Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance. International Affairs, 84(6), 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00765.x
Worbs, S., Rother, N., & Kreienbrink, A. (2019). Syrische Migranten in Deutschland als bedeutsame neue Bevölkerungsgruppe [Syrian Migrants in Germany as a Significant New Population Group]. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren, 61, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.15464/isi.61.2019.2-6
World Bank. (2014). Poverty and Health. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/health/brief/poverty-health
World Bank. (2019). Accelerating Poverty Reduction in Africa: In Five Charts. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/afr/publication/accelerating-poverty-reduction-in-africa-in-five-charts
World Bank. (2021a). Data Catalog—Rule of Law: Estimate. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/rule-law-estimate
World Bank. (2021b). Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)—Germany. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS?locations=DE
World Bank. (2021c). Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN
World Bank. (2021d). Primary education, pupils. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.ENRL
117
World Bank. (2021e). World Development Indicators. World Bank DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
World Bank. (2021f). World Governance Indicators. World Bank DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators
Woyke, W. (2020). Koaltion [Coalition]. In U. Andersen, J. Bogumil, S. Marschall, & W. Woyke (Eds.), Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Dictionary of the Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23670-0_67-1
Younas, J. (2008). Motivation for Bilateral Aid Allocation: Altruism or Trade Benefits. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 661–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.05.003
Zanger, S. C. (2000). Good Governance and European Aid: The Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics, 1(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001003002		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202101022en_US