學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 以社會資本強化農村韌性之研究 -以宜蘭縣員山鄉深溝新農為例
Study on strengthening rural resilience with social capital—a case of new farmers in Shengou Village, Yuanshan Township, Yilan County
作者 曾郁皓
Tzeng, Yu-Hao
貢獻者 顏愛靜
Yen, Ai-Ching
曾郁皓
Tzeng, Yu-Hao
關鍵詞 社會資本
韌性
農村韌性
深溝村
深溝新農
Social Capital
Resilience
Rural Resilience
Shengou Village
Shengou New Farmers
日期 2021
上傳時間 2-Sep-2021 17:29:47 (UTC+8)
摘要 近年因都市快速運轉的生活壓力與都市內環境品質的下降,都市原有的拉力漸轉為阻力甚至是推力,充滿人情味、守望相助的農村,帶來比都市更多心靈上的溫暖;充滿綠意、視野廣闊的農村,帶來比都市更宜人的生活空間,這樣的農村生活成為一個亮點。
而臺灣的農村卻因為過去居住人口的外移以及生產人口的老化,造成農村經濟蕭條、設施窳陋、整體發展延宕,使農村應對文化斷層、天災侵襲的韌性嚴重不足。如今農村再次成為一個生活所在地的新選擇,那麼使農村有能力承受、抵抗衝擊,並快速從衝擊中恢復的農村韌性就成為重要的農村議題。
本研究以宜蘭縣員山鄉深溝新農為例,新農以善待土地的理念自主匯聚於深溝村進行友善耕作,循著第一批新農的軌跡進入農村,透過他們的引介租得耕地,並與在地老農保持良好的互動,也透過自產自銷的模式與農村外的消費者建立連結,厚植與不同群體的社會資本,以利其在深溝村持續耕種、經營品牌、深根在地,使深溝村展現出有別於其他傳統農村獨特且更具農村韌性的風貌。
以Amit Ashkenazy(2018)等人提出的五項強化農村韌性策略為框架,分析深溝新農的經營模式,本研究發現要使農村韌性策略順利運作,深厚且紮實的社會資本是重要的要素之一,換言之,厚植社會資本對強化農村韌性有正向的幫助。惟深溝新農應注意社會資本的陰暗面,以避免受其限制;另政府部門應與農民們保持適度的連結與對話的空間,並於決策中尊重和考慮農民的自主意識與農民對農村的自主權,以利農村永續之發展。
In recent years, due to the pressure of life in the fast-moving city and the decline in the quality of the urban environment, the original pulling force of the city has gradually turned into resistance or even thrust. The humane and supportive countryside brings more spiritual warmth than the city; full of greenery, the countryside with a broad field of vision brings a more pleasant living space than the city, and this kind of rural life has become a bright spot.
However, rural areas in Taiwan have suffered from economic depression, poor facilities, and stagnation in overall development due to the migration of residential populations and the aging of the production laborers, lead to insufficient resilience to cope with cultural faults, natural disasters. Today, the countryside has once again become a new choice for a place to live, how the residents withstand shocks and quickly recover has become an important issue of rural resilience.
In this study, a case of new farmers in Shengou Village, Yuanshan Township, Yilan County was taken as an example. The new farmers gathered together in Shengou Village for environmentally friendly farming based on the idea of being kind to the land. They followed the path of the farmers that first stepped into the village, acquired farmland by lease through their introduction. The newcomers also maintained good interaction with local farmers, and established connections with consumers outside the rural areas through the self-production and self-sales model, and cultivated social capital from different groups to facilitate their continuous farming, brand management, and lay a foundation in the village. It showed Shengou Village as a unique and more resilient style that is different from other traditional rural areas.
Based on the five strategies for strengthening rural resilience proposed by Amit Ashkenazy et al. (2018), the study analyzed the business model of Shengou new farmers, and found that deep and solid social capital is one of the important elements for smooth operation of rural resilience strategies. In other words, cultivated and accumulated social capital has a positive effect on strengthening rural resilience. However, Shengou new farmers should pay attention to the dark side of social capital to avoid being restricted by it. In addition, the government officials should maintain an appropriate space for connecting and dialogue with farmers that their sense of self-governance and autonomy in rural areas should be respected and considered in decision making, so as to facilitate the sustainable development of rural areas.
參考文獻 一、中文參考文獻
1.專書
江明修,2014,『充實社會資本之研究』初版,臺北:行政院經濟建設委
員會。
塩見直紀著、蘇楓雅譯,2006,『半農半X的生活:順從自然,實踐天賦』初版,臺北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
賴青松,2007,『青松e種田筆記:榖東俱樂部』初版,臺北:心靈工坊。
顏愛靜,2013,『土地資源概論』初版,臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

2.期刊論文
王中天,2003,「社會資本(Social Capital):概念、源起、及現況」,『問題與研究』,42(5):139-163。
王嘉勳、陳榮俊、李鎮洋、施美琴、馮詩維、梁大慶,2019,「以臺灣原住民部落文化與生態永續發展里山韌性指標評估模式之研究-以南投仁愛鄉南豐村為例」,『觀光與休閒管理期刊』,7(2):139-156。
今井裕作,2012,「新規参入による就農者の確保と定着支援の在り方-島根県における集落営農での受入と半農半X就農を事例として」,『近畿中國四國農研農業經營研究』,23:18-27。
李承嘉、廖麗敏、陳怡婷、王玉真、藍逸之,2009,「多功能農業體制下的農地功能與使用方案選擇」,『台灣土地研究』,12(2):135-162。
吳守從,2019,「社區意識凝聚及農村價值提升之探討-以某社會企業活動為例」,『休閒事業研究』,17(1):1-13。
吳佩芝,2019,「氣候變遷調適—地方創生與社區健康」,『護理雜誌』,66(3):6-13。
周偉賢、林宗弘,2019,「社會資本、制度創新與九二一災後集合住宅重建」,『中華心理衛生學刊』,32(4):367-405。
林顯明,2016,「臺灣農村農業轉型之研究—高雄美濃為例」,『兩岸基層選舉與地方治理研究通訊』,3(2):32-58。
林裕彬、詹士樑、陸曉筠、江莉琦、徐家雯、林昭遠、劉小蘭、吳振發、林峰田、李慧琳、陳佳正、莊振義、羅敏輝、簡旭伸、連宛渝、余佳珍、吳岱蓉、林士,2018,「土地資源核心議題—土地系統動態變遷之因果與機制研究」,『台灣土地研究』,21(2):111-136。
季美珍,2020,「農村產業發展實踐途徑:以宜蘭縣三星鄉行健村為例」,『土地經濟年刊』,31:88-135。
洪士峰,2011,「半農半X的生活:順從自然,實踐天賦」,『庶民文化研究』,3:111-115。
相川陽一,2012「中山間地域での新規就農における市町村施策の意義と課題-島根県浜田市弥栄町の事例」,『近畿中國四國農研農業經營研究』,23:28-46。
高宜淓、佛光大學產品與媒體設計系,2018,「宜蘭縣深溝村半農半 X 發展之社會設計」,『休閒研究』,7(2):1-18。
陳希煌,2015,「現代化演進與臺灣農業」,『農業政策評論』,1(1):1-7。
徐嘉偉、李誌綿、王義善、張志維、孫正華、劉興榮、林素華,「都市蔓延對農村土地衝擊之探討」,『台灣鄉村研究』14:99-124。
深澤竜人,2011,「家庭内供給的小規模農業展開論―半農半 X の実態経済分析 Ⅰ―」,『経営情報学論集』,17:79-97。
深澤竜人,2012,「家庭内供給的小規模農業展開論(実践的環境経済学)を巡る議論―半農半 X の実態経済分析 Ⅱ―」,『経営情報学論集』,18:85-104。
梁大慶,2017,「以結構方程式探討農村社區組織能力與發展面向之模式:以雲林縣農村再生發展進程為例」,『鄉村旅遊研究』,10(1):41-61。
黃源協、劉素珍、莊俐昕、林信廷,2010,「社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究」,『公共行政學報』,34:29-75。
黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素珍,2011「社區社會資本的促成、阻礙因素及其發展策略:社區領導者觀點之分析」,『行政暨政策學報』,52:87-130。
程航、吳明儒,2019「文化資本透過社會資本中介影響地方發展的研究—以新港鄉為例」,『台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊』,9(2):161-212。
董建宏,2009,「台灣農村規劃與再生的困境-台灣農業與農村發展過程的反思」,『經濟前瞻』,122:82-90。
鄭傑夫、張凱智、宋秉明,2015,「從交易成本與社會資本的觀點探討有機農業與市場通路間之關係:以花蓮地區為例」,『觀光與休閒管理期刊』,3(2):89-107。
蔡宏進,2020,「變遷農村中人力與土地的困境與展望」,『農業推廣文彙』,65:133-137。
蕭代基、洪鴻智、楊智凱、黃德秀、王定心,2018,「國家氣候變遷與災害脆弱度評估資本分析法之應用」,『地理學報』,89:61-84。
謝漢欽、潘巍中,2018,「認識韌性(resilience)的意義」,『林業研究專訊』,25(6):73-76。
瞿宛文,2015,「台灣戰後農村土地改革的前因後果」,『台灣社會研究季刊』,98:11-67。
顏愛靜、楊孟儒,2020,「探索農村地區韌性實踐之路—以台中市霧峰區為例(一)」,『現代地政/人與地』,376 :108-118。
顏愛靜、楊孟儒,2021,「探索農村地區韌性實踐之路—以台中市霧峰區為例 (二)」,『現代地政/人與地』,377:10-29。
顏愛靜,2021,「歐盟RETHINK(反思)大型研究計畫的考察及其啟示」,『土地問題研究季刊』,20(1):2-22。

3.會議論文
沈嘉玲、戴興盛,2018,「蘭陽平原水田地景之變遷:社會生態系統韌性分析」,論文發表於〈第十屆發展研究年會台灣經驗2.0:在地與全球的發展研究與實踐〉,台灣發展研究學會:臺北,民國107年10月27日至28日。

4.博、碩論文
官武德,2013,「客家地區農村年輕力量之研究以新竹縣北埔鄉南埔村為例」,國立交通大學客家文化學院客家社會與文化學程碩士論文,新竹。
許瑋,2014,「半農半X在花蓮:鄉村移民之社會網絡與社會支持」,國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系碩士論文,花蓮。
黃如珍,2016,「阿寶與賴青松的新農民書寫」,國立臺北教育大學人文藝術學院台灣文化研究所碩士論文,臺北。
楊孟儒,2020,「農村地區韌性實踐之研究-以台中市霧峰區為例」,國立政治大學地政學系碩士學位論文,臺北。
葉舒婷,2017,「以行動者網絡理論觀點探討宜蘭深溝村新農聚群」,國立成功大學創意產業設計研究所碩士論文,臺南。
鄭鴻文,2019,「氣候變遷觀點下鄉村地區韌性特性與在地調適經驗之初探-以嘉義縣為例」,國立成功大學都市計畫學系研究所碩士論文,臺南。

5.網路參考資料
林慧貞,2013,「穀東十年,賴青松掀起農業新浪潮」,上下游News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/44317/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。
楊文全,2016,「未來的農村長怎樣?追夢的小農們 深溝亂譚!」,上下游
News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/90671/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。
楊文全,2017,「【觀點】連結、開放與共享 深溝小農群聚經驗分享」,上下游News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/91178/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。
賴青松,2019,「用一期稻作的時間交換人生的新視野!邀請大家來慢島學堂,互助共生共老」,上下游News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/128416/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。

二、外文參考文獻
1.專書
Aldrich, D., 2012, Building Resilience : Social Capital in Post-disaster Recovery, Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., 1985, The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson(Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood.
Daly, H., 2008, A Steady-State Economy: A Failed Growth Economy and a Steady-State Economy Are Not the Same Thing; They Are the Very Different Alternatives We Face., London, United Kingdom : UK Sustainable Development Commission.
Putnam R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work : Vivic Traditions in ModernItaly, New Jersey : Princeton University Press.

2.期刊論文
Ashkenazy, A., Chebach, T. C., Knickel, K., Peter, S., Horowitz, B. and Offenbach, R., 2018, “Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions - Findings from fourteen case studies,” Journal of Rural Studies, 59:211-221.
Bakker, Y. W., Koning, J. and Tatenhove, J., 2019, “Resilience and social capital: The engagement of fisheries communities in marine spatial planning,” Marine Policy, 99:132-139.
Berkes, F., 2009, “Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge
generation, bridging organizations and social learning,” Journal of Environmental Management, 90:1692-1702.
Berkes, F. and Ross, H., 2016, “Panarchy and community resilience: Sustainability science and policy implications,” Environmental Science & Policy, 61:185-193.
Coleman, J. S., 1988, “The creation and destruction of social capital: Implications for law”, Notre Dame J. Law, Ethics, Public Policy, 3:375-404.
Delgado-Serrano, M. M. and Borrego-Marin, M. M., 2020,“Drivers of innovation in groundwater governance. The links between the social and the ecological systems,” Land Use Policy, 91:1-17.
Esparcia, J., 2014, “Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects,” Journal of Rural Studies, 34:1-14.
Farley, J. and Voinov, A., 2016, “Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services,” Journal of Environmental Management, 183:389-398.
Fisher, R., 2013, “A gentleman’s handshake’: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge,” Journal of Rural Studies, 31:13-22.
Folke, C., 2006, “Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses,” Global Environmental Change, 16:253-267.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, N., Chapin, T. and Rockström, J., 2010, “Resilience thinking : integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability,” Ecology and Society, 15(4):20.
Gallopı´n, G. C., 2006, “Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity,” Global Environmental Change, 16:293-303.
Henderson, F., Steiner, A., Farmer, J. and Whittam, G., 2020,“Challenges of community engagement in a rural area: The impact of flood protection and policy,” Journal of Rural Studies, 73:225-233.
Hisano, S., Akitsu, M. and McGreevy, S. R. 2018, “Revitalising rurality under the neoliberal transformation of agriculture : Experiences of re-agrarianisation in Japan,” Journal of Rural Studies, 61:290-301.
Huttunen, S., 2019, “Revisiting agricultural modernization : Interconnected farming practices driving rural development at the farm level,” Journal of Rural Studies, 71:36-45.
Knickel, K., 2016, “Trajectories of agricultural modernization and rural resilience: Some first insights derived from case studies in 14 countries,” APSTRACT (Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce), Vol. 10(1): 31-44.
Knickel, K., Redman, M., Darnhofer I., Ashkenazy A., Calvao Chebach, T., Šūmane, S., Tisenkopfs, T., Zemeckis, R., Atkociuniene, V., Rivera, M., Strauss, A., Kristensen, L.S., Schiller, S., Koopmans, M.E., Rogge, E., 2018, “Between aspirations and reality: Making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable,” Journal of Rural Studies, 59:197-210.
King, B., Fielke, S., Bayne, K., Klerkx, L. and Nettle, R., 2019, “Navigating shades of social capital and trust to leverage opportunities for rural innovation,” Journal of Rural Studies, 68:123-134.
Oreszczyn, S., Lane, A. and Carr, S., 2010, “The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers’ engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations,” Journal of Rural Studies, 26:404-417.
Rivera, M., Knickel, K., Díaz-Puente, J. M. and Afonso, A., 2019, “The Role of Social Capital in Agricultural and Rural Development : Lessons Learnt from Case Studies in Seven Countries,” Sociologia Ruralis,59(1):66-91.
Sanyal, S. and Routray, J. K. 2016, “Social capital for disaster risk reduction and management with empirical evidences from Sundarbans of India,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19:101-111.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J., 2006, “Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability,” Global Environmental Change, 16:282-292.
Speranza, C. I., Wiesmann U. and Rist, S., 2014, “An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics,” Global Environmental Change, 28:109-119.
Straub, A. M., Gray, B. J., Ritchie, L. A. and Gill, D. A., 2020, “Cultivating disaster resilience in rural Oklahoma: Community disenfranchisement and relational aspects of social capital,” Journal of Rural Studies, 73:105-113.
Thomas, E., Riley, M. and Spees, J., 2020, “Knowledge flows: Farmers’ social
relations and knowledge sharing practices in ‘Catchment Sensitive Farming’,” Land Use Policy, 90:1-9.
Turner II, B. L., 2010, “Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?,” Global Environmental Change, 20:570-576.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter S. R. and Kinzig, A., 2004, “Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems,” Ecology and Society, 9(2):5
Wilson, G.A., 2013, “Community resilience, policy corridors and the policy challenge,” Land Use Policy, 31:298-310.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系碩士在職專班
107923023
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107923023
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 顏愛靜zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yen, Ai-Chingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 曾郁皓zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tzeng, Yu-Haoen_US
dc.creator (作者) 曾郁皓zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tzeng, Yu-Haoen_US
dc.date (日期) 2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2021 17:29:47 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Sep-2021 17:29:47 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2021 17:29:47 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107923023en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137034-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政學系碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107923023zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年因都市快速運轉的生活壓力與都市內環境品質的下降,都市原有的拉力漸轉為阻力甚至是推力,充滿人情味、守望相助的農村,帶來比都市更多心靈上的溫暖;充滿綠意、視野廣闊的農村,帶來比都市更宜人的生活空間,這樣的農村生活成為一個亮點。
而臺灣的農村卻因為過去居住人口的外移以及生產人口的老化,造成農村經濟蕭條、設施窳陋、整體發展延宕,使農村應對文化斷層、天災侵襲的韌性嚴重不足。如今農村再次成為一個生活所在地的新選擇,那麼使農村有能力承受、抵抗衝擊,並快速從衝擊中恢復的農村韌性就成為重要的農村議題。
本研究以宜蘭縣員山鄉深溝新農為例,新農以善待土地的理念自主匯聚於深溝村進行友善耕作,循著第一批新農的軌跡進入農村,透過他們的引介租得耕地,並與在地老農保持良好的互動,也透過自產自銷的模式與農村外的消費者建立連結,厚植與不同群體的社會資本,以利其在深溝村持續耕種、經營品牌、深根在地,使深溝村展現出有別於其他傳統農村獨特且更具農村韌性的風貌。
以Amit Ashkenazy(2018)等人提出的五項強化農村韌性策略為框架,分析深溝新農的經營模式,本研究發現要使農村韌性策略順利運作,深厚且紮實的社會資本是重要的要素之一,換言之,厚植社會資本對強化農村韌性有正向的幫助。惟深溝新農應注意社會資本的陰暗面,以避免受其限制;另政府部門應與農民們保持適度的連結與對話的空間,並於決策中尊重和考慮農民的自主意識與農民對農村的自主權,以利農村永續之發展。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, due to the pressure of life in the fast-moving city and the decline in the quality of the urban environment, the original pulling force of the city has gradually turned into resistance or even thrust. The humane and supportive countryside brings more spiritual warmth than the city; full of greenery, the countryside with a broad field of vision brings a more pleasant living space than the city, and this kind of rural life has become a bright spot.
However, rural areas in Taiwan have suffered from economic depression, poor facilities, and stagnation in overall development due to the migration of residential populations and the aging of the production laborers, lead to insufficient resilience to cope with cultural faults, natural disasters. Today, the countryside has once again become a new choice for a place to live, how the residents withstand shocks and quickly recover has become an important issue of rural resilience.
In this study, a case of new farmers in Shengou Village, Yuanshan Township, Yilan County was taken as an example. The new farmers gathered together in Shengou Village for environmentally friendly farming based on the idea of being kind to the land. They followed the path of the farmers that first stepped into the village, acquired farmland by lease through their introduction. The newcomers also maintained good interaction with local farmers, and established connections with consumers outside the rural areas through the self-production and self-sales model, and cultivated social capital from different groups to facilitate their continuous farming, brand management, and lay a foundation in the village. It showed Shengou Village as a unique and more resilient style that is different from other traditional rural areas.
Based on the five strategies for strengthening rural resilience proposed by Amit Ashkenazy et al. (2018), the study analyzed the business model of Shengou new farmers, and found that deep and solid social capital is one of the important elements for smooth operation of rural resilience strategies. In other words, cultivated and accumulated social capital has a positive effect on strengthening rural resilience. However, Shengou new farmers should pay attention to the dark side of social capital to avoid being restricted by it. In addition, the government officials should maintain an appropriate space for connecting and dialogue with farmers that their sense of self-governance and autonomy in rural areas should be respected and considered in decision making, so as to facilitate the sustainable development of rural areas.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究範圍 6
第三節 研究方法與流程 8
第二章 文獻回顧與理論基礎 11
第一節 文獻回顧 11
第二節 理論基礎 21
第三章 研究個案之回顧與現況 35
第一節 宜蘭縣員山鄉深溝村之概述 35
第二節 深溝新農之發展歷程 39
第四章 訪談設計與結果分析 49
第一節 訪談內容設計 49
第二節 新農社群社會資本分析 54
第三節 農村韌性強化分析 71
第四節 綜合分析 87
第五章 結論與建議 95
第一節 結論 95
第二節 建議 98
參考文獻 100
附錄 受訪者名冊 107
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 5741748 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107923023en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 韌性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 農村韌性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 深溝村zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 深溝新農zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resilienceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rural Resilienceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Shengou Villageen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Shengou New Farmersen_US
dc.title (題名) 以社會資本強化農村韌性之研究 -以宜蘭縣員山鄉深溝新農為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Study on strengthening rural resilience with social capital—a case of new farmers in Shengou Village, Yuanshan Township, Yilan Countyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文參考文獻
1.專書
江明修,2014,『充實社會資本之研究』初版,臺北:行政院經濟建設委
員會。
塩見直紀著、蘇楓雅譯,2006,『半農半X的生活:順從自然,實踐天賦』初版,臺北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
賴青松,2007,『青松e種田筆記:榖東俱樂部』初版,臺北:心靈工坊。
顏愛靜,2013,『土地資源概論』初版,臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

2.期刊論文
王中天,2003,「社會資本(Social Capital):概念、源起、及現況」,『問題與研究』,42(5):139-163。
王嘉勳、陳榮俊、李鎮洋、施美琴、馮詩維、梁大慶,2019,「以臺灣原住民部落文化與生態永續發展里山韌性指標評估模式之研究-以南投仁愛鄉南豐村為例」,『觀光與休閒管理期刊』,7(2):139-156。
今井裕作,2012,「新規参入による就農者の確保と定着支援の在り方-島根県における集落営農での受入と半農半X就農を事例として」,『近畿中國四國農研農業經營研究』,23:18-27。
李承嘉、廖麗敏、陳怡婷、王玉真、藍逸之,2009,「多功能農業體制下的農地功能與使用方案選擇」,『台灣土地研究』,12(2):135-162。
吳守從,2019,「社區意識凝聚及農村價值提升之探討-以某社會企業活動為例」,『休閒事業研究』,17(1):1-13。
吳佩芝,2019,「氣候變遷調適—地方創生與社區健康」,『護理雜誌』,66(3):6-13。
周偉賢、林宗弘,2019,「社會資本、制度創新與九二一災後集合住宅重建」,『中華心理衛生學刊』,32(4):367-405。
林顯明,2016,「臺灣農村農業轉型之研究—高雄美濃為例」,『兩岸基層選舉與地方治理研究通訊』,3(2):32-58。
林裕彬、詹士樑、陸曉筠、江莉琦、徐家雯、林昭遠、劉小蘭、吳振發、林峰田、李慧琳、陳佳正、莊振義、羅敏輝、簡旭伸、連宛渝、余佳珍、吳岱蓉、林士,2018,「土地資源核心議題—土地系統動態變遷之因果與機制研究」,『台灣土地研究』,21(2):111-136。
季美珍,2020,「農村產業發展實踐途徑:以宜蘭縣三星鄉行健村為例」,『土地經濟年刊』,31:88-135。
洪士峰,2011,「半農半X的生活:順從自然,實踐天賦」,『庶民文化研究』,3:111-115。
相川陽一,2012「中山間地域での新規就農における市町村施策の意義と課題-島根県浜田市弥栄町の事例」,『近畿中國四國農研農業經營研究』,23:28-46。
高宜淓、佛光大學產品與媒體設計系,2018,「宜蘭縣深溝村半農半 X 發展之社會設計」,『休閒研究』,7(2):1-18。
陳希煌,2015,「現代化演進與臺灣農業」,『農業政策評論』,1(1):1-7。
徐嘉偉、李誌綿、王義善、張志維、孫正華、劉興榮、林素華,「都市蔓延對農村土地衝擊之探討」,『台灣鄉村研究』14:99-124。
深澤竜人,2011,「家庭内供給的小規模農業展開論―半農半 X の実態経済分析 Ⅰ―」,『経営情報学論集』,17:79-97。
深澤竜人,2012,「家庭内供給的小規模農業展開論(実践的環境経済学)を巡る議論―半農半 X の実態経済分析 Ⅱ―」,『経営情報学論集』,18:85-104。
梁大慶,2017,「以結構方程式探討農村社區組織能力與發展面向之模式:以雲林縣農村再生發展進程為例」,『鄉村旅遊研究』,10(1):41-61。
黃源協、劉素珍、莊俐昕、林信廷,2010,「社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究」,『公共行政學報』,34:29-75。
黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素珍,2011「社區社會資本的促成、阻礙因素及其發展策略:社區領導者觀點之分析」,『行政暨政策學報』,52:87-130。
程航、吳明儒,2019「文化資本透過社會資本中介影響地方發展的研究—以新港鄉為例」,『台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊』,9(2):161-212。
董建宏,2009,「台灣農村規劃與再生的困境-台灣農業與農村發展過程的反思」,『經濟前瞻』,122:82-90。
鄭傑夫、張凱智、宋秉明,2015,「從交易成本與社會資本的觀點探討有機農業與市場通路間之關係:以花蓮地區為例」,『觀光與休閒管理期刊』,3(2):89-107。
蔡宏進,2020,「變遷農村中人力與土地的困境與展望」,『農業推廣文彙』,65:133-137。
蕭代基、洪鴻智、楊智凱、黃德秀、王定心,2018,「國家氣候變遷與災害脆弱度評估資本分析法之應用」,『地理學報』,89:61-84。
謝漢欽、潘巍中,2018,「認識韌性(resilience)的意義」,『林業研究專訊』,25(6):73-76。
瞿宛文,2015,「台灣戰後農村土地改革的前因後果」,『台灣社會研究季刊』,98:11-67。
顏愛靜、楊孟儒,2020,「探索農村地區韌性實踐之路—以台中市霧峰區為例(一)」,『現代地政/人與地』,376 :108-118。
顏愛靜、楊孟儒,2021,「探索農村地區韌性實踐之路—以台中市霧峰區為例 (二)」,『現代地政/人與地』,377:10-29。
顏愛靜,2021,「歐盟RETHINK(反思)大型研究計畫的考察及其啟示」,『土地問題研究季刊』,20(1):2-22。

3.會議論文
沈嘉玲、戴興盛,2018,「蘭陽平原水田地景之變遷:社會生態系統韌性分析」,論文發表於〈第十屆發展研究年會台灣經驗2.0:在地與全球的發展研究與實踐〉,台灣發展研究學會:臺北,民國107年10月27日至28日。

4.博、碩論文
官武德,2013,「客家地區農村年輕力量之研究以新竹縣北埔鄉南埔村為例」,國立交通大學客家文化學院客家社會與文化學程碩士論文,新竹。
許瑋,2014,「半農半X在花蓮:鄉村移民之社會網絡與社會支持」,國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系碩士論文,花蓮。
黃如珍,2016,「阿寶與賴青松的新農民書寫」,國立臺北教育大學人文藝術學院台灣文化研究所碩士論文,臺北。
楊孟儒,2020,「農村地區韌性實踐之研究-以台中市霧峰區為例」,國立政治大學地政學系碩士學位論文,臺北。
葉舒婷,2017,「以行動者網絡理論觀點探討宜蘭深溝村新農聚群」,國立成功大學創意產業設計研究所碩士論文,臺南。
鄭鴻文,2019,「氣候變遷觀點下鄉村地區韌性特性與在地調適經驗之初探-以嘉義縣為例」,國立成功大學都市計畫學系研究所碩士論文,臺南。

5.網路參考資料
林慧貞,2013,「穀東十年,賴青松掀起農業新浪潮」,上下游News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/44317/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。
楊文全,2016,「未來的農村長怎樣?追夢的小農們 深溝亂譚!」,上下游
News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/90671/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。
楊文全,2017,「【觀點】連結、開放與共享 深溝小農群聚經驗分享」,上下游News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/91178/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。
賴青松,2019,「用一期稻作的時間交換人生的新視野!邀請大家來慢島學堂,互助共生共老」,上下游News&Market,https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/128416/,取用日期:2020年03月12日。

二、外文參考文獻
1.專書
Aldrich, D., 2012, Building Resilience : Social Capital in Post-disaster Recovery, Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., 1985, The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson(Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood.
Daly, H., 2008, A Steady-State Economy: A Failed Growth Economy and a Steady-State Economy Are Not the Same Thing; They Are the Very Different Alternatives We Face., London, United Kingdom : UK Sustainable Development Commission.
Putnam R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work : Vivic Traditions in ModernItaly, New Jersey : Princeton University Press.

2.期刊論文
Ashkenazy, A., Chebach, T. C., Knickel, K., Peter, S., Horowitz, B. and Offenbach, R., 2018, “Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions - Findings from fourteen case studies,” Journal of Rural Studies, 59:211-221.
Bakker, Y. W., Koning, J. and Tatenhove, J., 2019, “Resilience and social capital: The engagement of fisheries communities in marine spatial planning,” Marine Policy, 99:132-139.
Berkes, F., 2009, “Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge
generation, bridging organizations and social learning,” Journal of Environmental Management, 90:1692-1702.
Berkes, F. and Ross, H., 2016, “Panarchy and community resilience: Sustainability science and policy implications,” Environmental Science & Policy, 61:185-193.
Coleman, J. S., 1988, “The creation and destruction of social capital: Implications for law”, Notre Dame J. Law, Ethics, Public Policy, 3:375-404.
Delgado-Serrano, M. M. and Borrego-Marin, M. M., 2020,“Drivers of innovation in groundwater governance. The links between the social and the ecological systems,” Land Use Policy, 91:1-17.
Esparcia, J., 2014, “Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects,” Journal of Rural Studies, 34:1-14.
Farley, J. and Voinov, A., 2016, “Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services,” Journal of Environmental Management, 183:389-398.
Fisher, R., 2013, “A gentleman’s handshake’: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge,” Journal of Rural Studies, 31:13-22.
Folke, C., 2006, “Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses,” Global Environmental Change, 16:253-267.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, N., Chapin, T. and Rockström, J., 2010, “Resilience thinking : integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability,” Ecology and Society, 15(4):20.
Gallopı´n, G. C., 2006, “Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity,” Global Environmental Change, 16:293-303.
Henderson, F., Steiner, A., Farmer, J. and Whittam, G., 2020,“Challenges of community engagement in a rural area: The impact of flood protection and policy,” Journal of Rural Studies, 73:225-233.
Hisano, S., Akitsu, M. and McGreevy, S. R. 2018, “Revitalising rurality under the neoliberal transformation of agriculture : Experiences of re-agrarianisation in Japan,” Journal of Rural Studies, 61:290-301.
Huttunen, S., 2019, “Revisiting agricultural modernization : Interconnected farming practices driving rural development at the farm level,” Journal of Rural Studies, 71:36-45.
Knickel, K., 2016, “Trajectories of agricultural modernization and rural resilience: Some first insights derived from case studies in 14 countries,” APSTRACT (Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce), Vol. 10(1): 31-44.
Knickel, K., Redman, M., Darnhofer I., Ashkenazy A., Calvao Chebach, T., Šūmane, S., Tisenkopfs, T., Zemeckis, R., Atkociuniene, V., Rivera, M., Strauss, A., Kristensen, L.S., Schiller, S., Koopmans, M.E., Rogge, E., 2018, “Between aspirations and reality: Making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable,” Journal of Rural Studies, 59:197-210.
King, B., Fielke, S., Bayne, K., Klerkx, L. and Nettle, R., 2019, “Navigating shades of social capital and trust to leverage opportunities for rural innovation,” Journal of Rural Studies, 68:123-134.
Oreszczyn, S., Lane, A. and Carr, S., 2010, “The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers’ engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations,” Journal of Rural Studies, 26:404-417.
Rivera, M., Knickel, K., Díaz-Puente, J. M. and Afonso, A., 2019, “The Role of Social Capital in Agricultural and Rural Development : Lessons Learnt from Case Studies in Seven Countries,” Sociologia Ruralis,59(1):66-91.
Sanyal, S. and Routray, J. K. 2016, “Social capital for disaster risk reduction and management with empirical evidences from Sundarbans of India,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19:101-111.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J., 2006, “Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability,” Global Environmental Change, 16:282-292.
Speranza, C. I., Wiesmann U. and Rist, S., 2014, “An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics,” Global Environmental Change, 28:109-119.
Straub, A. M., Gray, B. J., Ritchie, L. A. and Gill, D. A., 2020, “Cultivating disaster resilience in rural Oklahoma: Community disenfranchisement and relational aspects of social capital,” Journal of Rural Studies, 73:105-113.
Thomas, E., Riley, M. and Spees, J., 2020, “Knowledge flows: Farmers’ social
relations and knowledge sharing practices in ‘Catchment Sensitive Farming’,” Land Use Policy, 90:1-9.
Turner II, B. L., 2010, “Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?,” Global Environmental Change, 20:570-576.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter S. R. and Kinzig, A., 2004, “Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems,” Ecology and Society, 9(2):5
Wilson, G.A., 2013, “Community resilience, policy corridors and the policy challenge,” Land Use Policy, 31:298-310.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202101347en_US