| dc.contributor | 政治大學哲學學報 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 李國揚 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Kok Yong | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2021-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Nov-2021 16:18:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Nov-2021 16:18:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Nov-2021 16:18:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137855 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 筆者在〈論Gettier式思想實驗的兩難〉一文中主張，對Gettier式思想實驗持傳統觀點的哲學家，會面臨一個兩難。本文的目的在於解消這個兩難。更精確地說，這個兩難的一個核心主張是，Gettier式思想實驗可以作為知識理論的反例，只有當「必然論」（necessitism）是不成立的。本文提出一個嶄新的論證，替必然論回應上述的批評。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In ＂On a Dilemma of the Gettier-style thought experiments＂, I argue that the traditional view on the Gettier-style thought experiments will give rise to a dilemma. This paper aims at dissolving this dilemma. More exactly, the crux of a horn of the dilemma consists in denying a view called ＂necessitism＂. In this paper, I offer a novel argument defending necessitism. | |
| dc.format.extent | 669381 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 政治大學哲學學報, 45, 163-193 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 思想實驗 ; Gettier問題 ; Gettier式思想實驗的兩難 ; 兩難 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | thought experiment ; Gettier problem ; dilemma of the Gettier-style thought experiment ; dilemma | |
| dc.title (題名) | Gettier式思想實驗兩難之解消方案 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Resolving the Dilemma of the Gettier-Style Thought Experiments | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.30393/TNCUP.202101_(45).0005 | |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202101_(45).0005 | |
