學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 2000年後的新加坡軍事變革
The Military Changes of Singapore After 2000作者 王光磊
Wang, Kuang-Lei貢獻者 黃奎博
Huang, Kwei-Bo
王光磊
Wang, Kuang-Lei關鍵詞 新加坡
軍事變革
第三代新加坡軍隊
組織同形
Singapore
Singapore Armed Forces
Military transformation
Organizational isomorphism日期 2011 上傳時間 3-一月-2022 16:16:37 (UTC+8) 摘要 摘要 新加坡臨近重要航道麻六甲海峽，在全球戰略地位極為重要，但該國面積狹小，幾無腹地與自然資源，但這個國家卻在獨立不到五十年內，建立量小質精的軍事力量，藉此嚇阻與對抗外來威脅；而且，新加坡軍隊已在進入二十一世紀時展開新一波軍事變革，建立「以知識為基礎之整合式指管」體系，打造採取網狀化總體作戰網路概念的「第三代新加坡軍隊」，其變革程度甚至遠超過許多其他國土更大，資源更豐之國家。 為了解新加坡這波軍事變革動力與起源，本文重新爬梳軍事變革之定義、類型與根源，進而討論東南亞當前安全環境，以及新加坡面臨的安全威脅，與其衍生的國防安全戰略；再透過整理新加坡現有軍力、未來建軍方向與作戰思維發展，進而分析新加坡軍事變革背後的動力。本文發現，新加坡軍事變革的方向與目標，不只受到傳統「戰略需求」影響，亦同時受到「科技發展」與「組織同形需求壓力」牽引，變革後產生之軍事實力變化，將回饋至區域安全環境中，並且導致國家戰略之再變化，進而引領新的軍事變革需求。
Summery Singapore is a sovereign island city-state bordering the Straits of Malacca. Despite lacking natural resources and a hinterland, Singapore Armed Forces is the most technologically advanced in Southeast Asia. However, the Ministry of Defence, Singapore had started new wave of military transformation around 2000 to build "the 3rd Generation Singapore Armed Forces". The transformation pushes SAF`s troops making use of networks to sense faster, manoeuvring forces effectively, applying combat power precisely across the battlefield, and striking targets with a swifter and deadlier punch. This study reviews the international environment and the defense strategy of Singapore, and analyzes the strength and future development programs of SAF. It finds out the directions and goal s of Singapore`s military transformation had not only driven by its strategic needs but the advance of military technologies and organizational isomorphism needs.參考文獻 參考文獻壹、中文文獻一、政府資料與出版品張中勇，〈中共對南海紛爭的衝突策略〉，國防雜誌，第11卷，第10期，1996年4月。高一中譯，Marvin C. Ott，〈東南亞安全‧區域觀點〉，National Defense University編，《中共崛起構成的挑戰：亞洲觀點》，台北：國防部史政編譯局譯印2001，頁105-131。國防部史政編譯局譯，Allan Collins著，《東南亞的安全困境》，臺北：國防部史政編譯局，2000，頁 24-25。張天虹、翟文中、沈明室譯，Wilfried A. Herrmann，〈東亞與東南亞的傳統軍備擴散〉，Wilfried A. Herrmann編，《亞洲的安全挑戰》，台北：國防部史政編譯局譯印，2000，頁39-58。黃文啟譯，Elinor Sloan著，《軍事轉型與當代戰爭》，台北：國防部史政編譯局譯印，2010，頁5至10。.楊志恆，〈泰、柬神廟主權爭議，考驗東協團結〉，《青年日報》，2011年3月10日，版7；曾祥穎譯，Emily O. Goldman 著，〈土耳其奧圖曼帝國及日本明治維新：西方軍事模式之延伸〉Theo Farrell、Terry Terriff合編，《軍事變革的根源：文化、政治與科技》，台北：國防部史政編譯局，2005，頁61。宋玉寧，〈新加坡AV81輪型裝甲車〉，《青年日報》，2005年10月17日，版3。二、專書與專書論文中國現代國際關係研究所反恐怖研究中心編，《國際重大恐怖案例分析》，北京，時事出版社。陳鴻瑜，《新加坡史》，臺北，臺灣商務印書館，2011年。陳欣之，《東南亞安全》，台北，生智出版，1999。李彬，〈武器擴散與軍備擴張〉，閻學通、金德湘主編，《東亞和平與安全》，北京，時事出版社出版，2005年。林佾靜，〈911後，亞太區域安全體制的變動與延續〉，2004年4月22日，收錄於：《2004年台灣的東南亞區域研究年度研討會論文集》，台北：淡江大學東南亞研究所(主辦)，中央研究院亞太區域研究專題中心（合辦）、國立暨南國際大學東南亞研究所(合辦)、國立中山大學東南亞研究中心（合辦）。林詩凱，《「九一一」事件後新加坡「反恐」策略之研究》，暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文，2006年。夏立平著，《亞太軍備控制與安全》，上海，上海人民出版社出版，2002年。三、期刊論文吳彥華，〈專訪新加坡戰略專家柯宗元─強權幻滅獨立建軍〉，《亞洲週刊》，第37期，2000年9月17日。孫國祥、賴岳謙、童振源、陳世民、黃奎博著，《亞太綜合安全年報2002-2003》，台北：遠景基金會、嘉義：南華大學亞太研究所，2003年6月。張亞中、孫國祥著，《亞太綜合安全年報2001-2002》，台北：遠景基金會、嘉義：南華大學亞太研究所，2002年6月。陳佩修，「當前國際恐怖主義對亞洲國家的威脅與影響─以東南亞區域為例」，「『九一一』三週年之觀察與省思─全球恐怖主義與國際反恐現況分析」，中華歐亞基金會主辦，臺中，2004年九月。陳鴻瑜，〈新加坡的外交政策〉，《問題與研究》，第28卷，第10期，1989年7月。───，〈後冷戰時期東南亞之區域安全〉，《戰略與國際研究季刊》，臺灣綜合研究院與國際研究所，第1卷，第1期，1999年1月。謝福進，〈東亞政經情況─區域反恐與經濟競合〉，《亞太形勢發展與展望：2002-2003》，遠景基金會，頁51。翁履中，《新加坡綜合安全戰略之研究》，淡江大學東南亞研究所碩士論文，2004年。〈經典戰車－各國改良型豹二戰車巡禮（三）〉，《亞太防務》12期，2009年4月。貳、英文文獻一、政府資料‘Joint Strike Fighter Acquisition: Observations on the Supplier Base.’ United Stated General Accounting Office, May 2004, pp. 3-6.National Security Coordination Centre (NSCC), The Fight Terror, Singapore’s National Security Strategy, 2004. http://app.nscs.gov.sg/public/download.ashx?id=48U.S. Defense Dept., Network-centric Warfare: Creating a Decisive Warfighting Advantage. Washington, D.C.: Office of Defense Transformation, 2003.Singapore Ministry of Defence, Defending Singapore in 21st Century. Singapore: Ministry of Defence, 2010.Office of Force Transformation, Military Transformation: A Strategic Approach. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Fall 2003.二、專書與專書論文Defence of Singapore 1994-95. Singapore: Ministry of Defence, 1994).Antolik, Michael, ASEAN and the Diplomacy of Accommodation. U.S.: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.,1990.Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and Strategic Studies. London: Macmillan, 1987.Creveld, Martin Van, Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. to the Present. London Collier Macmillan, 1989.DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The University of Chicago Press, 1991.Farrell, Theo, ‘Culture and Military Power’, Review of International Studies, 24/3 (1998), pp. 407-416.Finnemore, Martha, ‘Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism,’ International Organization, 50/3 (1996), pp. 339-342.Goldman, Emily O., Information Revolution in military Affair: Prospects for Asia. Manuscript, prepared for the Office of Net Assessment, U.S. Defense Dept., 2003.Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Lynn, John A. ‘The Evolution of Army Style in the Modern West, 800-2000,’ International History Review, 18/3 (August 1996), pp. 509.Mazarr, Michael J., Jeffrey Shaffer, and Benjamin Ederington, The Military Technical Revolution. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 1993.Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas & Francisco O. Ramirez, ‘World Society and the Nation-State,’ American Journal of Sociology, 193/2 (1997), pp. 144-181.Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Sekhon, Harinder, ‘America’s Role in Asia,’ in Daljit Singh eds., Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia, 2007, pp. 37-47.Singh, Daljit, ‘Asia-Pacific Political and Security Dynamics,’ in Daljit Singh eds., Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia, 2007, pp. 25-36.---------------, ‘Southeast Asian Security: An Overview,’ Regional Outlook: Southeast Asia 2008/2009, (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008).Sridharan, Kripa,“India-ASEAN Relations: Evolution, Growth, and Prospects,” in Jeshurun Chandran eds., China, India, Japan and the Security of Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of South-east Asian Studies, 1993.Tan, Andrew, “The New Terrorism: Implication and Strategies,” in Andrew Tan & Kumar Ramakrishna eds., The New Terrorism: Anatomy, Trends and Counter-Strategies. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2002, pp. 234-45.--------------, “Terrorism in the Asia-Pacific: Treat and Response-The Singapore Experience,” in Rohan Gunaratna eds., Terrorism in the Asia-Pacific: Treat and Response. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2003, pp. 226-48.--------------, “The New Terrorism: How Southeast Asia Can Counter It,” in Uwe Johannen, Alan Smith & James Gomez eds., September 11 & Political Freedom: Asian Perspectives. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2002, pp. 86-115.Tin, Maung Maung Than, ‘Political and Security in Southeast Asia: Trend and Challenges,’ in Daljit Singh eds., Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia, 2007, pp. 80-100.Tow, William T., Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Walt, Stephen, The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.三、期刊論文‘Interview with Major General Ng Chee Meng (Chief of Air Force, RSAF),’ Asian Defence Journal, (October 2010), pp. 12-13.Ang, Chee Wee, ‘The Future of Southeast Asian Multilateralism: Towards a Security Community?’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 35/3(2009), pp. 45-62.Ball, Desmond, ‘Arms and Affluence: Military Acquisitions in the Asia-Pacific Region,’ International Security, 18/3 (Winter 1993/94).Bitzinger, Richard A., ‘Come the Revolution – Transforming the Asia-Pacific’s Militaries,’ Naval War College Review, 58/4 (Autumn 2005), pp. 39-60.Boot, Max, ‘The Stuggle to Transform the Military,’ Foreign Affairs, 84/2 (March/April 2005).Cimbala, Stephen J., ‘Transformation in Concept and Policy,’ Joint Force Quarterly 32 (Autumn 2002), pp. 70.DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,’ American Sociological Review, 48: 2 (April 1983).International Institute of Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 1995-1996. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Studies, 1995.International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2000/2001. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Studies, 2000.International Institute of Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2010. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Studies, 2010.International Institute of Strategic Studies, the, The Military Balance 2011. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Strategic Studies, 2011.Jervis, Robert, ‘Security Regimes’, International Organization, 36/2(Spring 1982).Joyce, Mark, ‘Transforming Transformation: American Trend and Transatlantic Implications,’ RUSI Newsbrief, 24/7(July 2004).Hundley, Richard O., ‘Past Revolutions, Future Transformations.’ Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 1999.Mak, J. N., and B. A. Hamzah, ‘The External Maritime Dimension of ASEAN Security’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 18/3(September 1995).Ng, Chee Khern, ‘Safety and the RSAF Transformation,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 34/1(2008), pp. 5-15.--------------------, ‘Smaller Air Force and the Future of Air Power – A Perspective from Singapore,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 34/3(2008), pp. 5-12.Ng, Roland, Liau Eng Soon, Poh Li San, Ng Boon Ching & Timothy Ang, ‘The 3rd Generation RSAF: Managing Transformational Tensions,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/1(2007), pp. 13-24.Pudas, Terry J., ‘Disruptive Challenges and Accelerating Force Transformation,’ Joint Forces Quarterly 42(July 2006), pp. 47.Perry, William, “Desert Storm and Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, 70/ 4(Fall 1991).Raudzens, George, ‘War-Winning Weapons: The Measurement of Technological Determinism in Military History,’ Journal of Military History, 54/3(1990), pp. 403-433.Rumsfeld, Donald H., ‘Transforming the Military,’ Foreign Affair, 81/3(May/June 2002), pp. 21-27.Szafranski, Richard, ‘Peer Competitors, the RMA, and New Concepts: Some Questions,’ Naval War College Review, 49/2(Spring 1996), pp. 118.Talbot, David, ‘How Technology Failed in Iraq,’ Technology Review (November 2004).Tan, Ying Kiat, Lee Siew Hui, Aldrin Tan & Tay Shulin, ‘Enhancing Integration in Transformation,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/1(2007), pp. 25-34.Tan, Kai Hoe, ‘Naval Transformation: Progress, Prospects and People,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 34/2(2007), pp. 5-13.Wong, Gareth, ‘Beyond the Velvet Curtain of Transformation – How the Future of Warfare will be Shaped,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/3(2007), pp. 44-65.四、新聞與網路資料‘Operationalisation of the First Motorised Infantry Battalion.’ MINDEF Singapore. May 31, 2011. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2011/may/31may11_nr.html‘RSN - Assets - Unmanned Surface Vehicles.’ MINDEF Singapore. June 2, 2010. Retrieved 15 September. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/content/imindef/mindef_websites/atoz`listings/navy/assets/unmannedsurfacevehicles.html‘Russia dominates Asian market with 28 diesel subs’, April 6, 2010. http://rusnavy.com/news/navy/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=9667‘Singapore finally opts for F-15T’, Flight International, September 13, 2005. http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2005/09/13/201504/singapore-finally-opts-for-f-15t.html‘Singapore Signs Letter of Intent for Joint Strike Fighter Programme.’ MINDEF Singapore, April 19, 2006. Retrieved: June 16, 2010. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2003/feb/22feb03_nr2.htmlChew, Men Leong, ‘Navies and Maritime Security – A Republic of Singapore Navy Perspective,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/3(2007). See http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2007/v33n3/feature1.htmlLiang, Lim Wui & Lim Yong, ‘German tanks to add punch to SAF arsenal,’ The Straits Times, December 12, 2006.Huxley, Tim, ‘Singapore and the Revolution in Military Affair: an outsider’s perspective,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 30/1(2004). See http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2004/v30n1/features/feature4.htmlNeisloss, Liz ‘Robert Gates warns of possible clashes in the South China Sea’, CNN, June 4, 2011. http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/06/04/china.gates.visit/index.html?hpt=hp_t2‘Operationalisation of the First Motorised Infantry Battalion,’ MINDEF Singapore, May 31, 2011. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2011/may/31may11_nr.htmlSingh, Deep, ‘The SAF’s Experiences in Peace Support Operations,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 30/4(2004). http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2004/v30n4/features/feature4.html 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系
93253029資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093253029 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃奎博 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Kwei-Bo en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 王光磊 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Wang, Kuang-Lei en_US dc.creator (作者) 王光磊 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wang, Kuang-Lei en_US dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-一月-2022 16:16:37 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-一月-2022 16:16:37 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-一月-2022 16:16:37 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0093253029 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138395 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 外交學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 93253029 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 摘要 新加坡臨近重要航道麻六甲海峽，在全球戰略地位極為重要，但該國面積狹小，幾無腹地與自然資源，但這個國家卻在獨立不到五十年內，建立量小質精的軍事力量，藉此嚇阻與對抗外來威脅；而且，新加坡軍隊已在進入二十一世紀時展開新一波軍事變革，建立「以知識為基礎之整合式指管」體系，打造採取網狀化總體作戰網路概念的「第三代新加坡軍隊」，其變革程度甚至遠超過許多其他國土更大，資源更豐之國家。 為了解新加坡這波軍事變革動力與起源，本文重新爬梳軍事變革之定義、類型與根源，進而討論東南亞當前安全環境，以及新加坡面臨的安全威脅，與其衍生的國防安全戰略；再透過整理新加坡現有軍力、未來建軍方向與作戰思維發展，進而分析新加坡軍事變革背後的動力。本文發現，新加坡軍事變革的方向與目標，不只受到傳統「戰略需求」影響，亦同時受到「科技發展」與「組織同形需求壓力」牽引，變革後產生之軍事實力變化，將回饋至區域安全環境中，並且導致國家戰略之再變化，進而引領新的軍事變革需求。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Summery Singapore is a sovereign island city-state bordering the Straits of Malacca. Despite lacking natural resources and a hinterland, Singapore Armed Forces is the most technologically advanced in Southeast Asia. However, the Ministry of Defence, Singapore had started new wave of military transformation around 2000 to build "the 3rd Generation Singapore Armed Forces". The transformation pushes SAF`s troops making use of networks to sense faster, manoeuvring forces effectively, applying combat power precisely across the battlefield, and striking targets with a swifter and deadlier punch. This study reviews the international environment and the defense strategy of Singapore, and analyzes the strength and future development programs of SAF. It finds out the directions and goal s of Singapore`s military transformation had not only driven by its strategic needs but the advance of military technologies and organizational isomorphism needs. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 目 錄第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………….. 1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………….. 1 第二節 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………….. 3 第三節 研究架構與假設……………………………………………………….11 第四節 研究範圍與方法……………………………………………………….14 第五節 章節安排……………………………………………………………….16第二章 軍事變革之定義、類型與根源 …………………………………………....18 第一節 後冷戰時期軍事變革的定義與類型…………………………………..19 第二節 軍事變革的動力─戰略、科技與組織………………………………..26 第三節 本研究認為軍事變革之過程…………………………………………..32 第四節 小結……………………………………………………………………..35第三章 新加坡的安全環境變遷與國防安全戰略…………………………………..36 第一節 東南亞安全環境的變化………………………………………………..36 第二節 新加坡當前的安全環境威脅…………………………………………..39 第三節 新加坡的國防安全戰略………………………………………………..46第四章 新加坡的軍事變革 ………………………………………………………… 51 第一節 新加坡現有軍力概況………………………………………………......51 第二節 新加坡軍事變革之方向………………………………………………..55 第三節 新加坡在武器裝備上的變革…………………………………………..59 第四節 新加坡在軍事概念思維上的變革……………………………………..70 第五節 小結……………………………………………………………………..74第五章 新加坡的軍事變革分析………………………………………………………76 第一節 新加坡軍事變革之類型與根源分析………………………………….76 第二節 新加坡軍事變革之限制……………………………………………….82 第三節 新加坡軍事變革對區域國家之影響………………………………….85 第四節 小結……………………………………………………………………….86第六章 結論……………………………………………………………………………88參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………91 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3069098 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093253029 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新加坡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 軍事變革 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 第三代新加坡軍隊 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織同形 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Singapore en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Singapore Armed Forces en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Military transformation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Organizational isomorphism en_US dc.title (題名) 2000年後的新加坡軍事變革 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Military Changes of Singapore After 2000 en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻壹、中文文獻一、政府資料與出版品張中勇，〈中共對南海紛爭的衝突策略〉，國防雜誌，第11卷，第10期，1996年4月。高一中譯，Marvin C. Ott，〈東南亞安全‧區域觀點〉，National Defense University編，《中共崛起構成的挑戰：亞洲觀點》，台北：國防部史政編譯局譯印2001，頁105-131。國防部史政編譯局譯，Allan Collins著，《東南亞的安全困境》，臺北：國防部史政編譯局，2000，頁 24-25。張天虹、翟文中、沈明室譯，Wilfried A. Herrmann，〈東亞與東南亞的傳統軍備擴散〉，Wilfried A. Herrmann編，《亞洲的安全挑戰》，台北：國防部史政編譯局譯印，2000，頁39-58。黃文啟譯，Elinor Sloan著，《軍事轉型與當代戰爭》，台北：國防部史政編譯局譯印，2010，頁5至10。.楊志恆，〈泰、柬神廟主權爭議，考驗東協團結〉，《青年日報》，2011年3月10日，版7；曾祥穎譯，Emily O. Goldman 著，〈土耳其奧圖曼帝國及日本明治維新：西方軍事模式之延伸〉Theo Farrell、Terry Terriff合編，《軍事變革的根源：文化、政治與科技》，台北：國防部史政編譯局，2005，頁61。宋玉寧，〈新加坡AV81輪型裝甲車〉，《青年日報》，2005年10月17日，版3。二、專書與專書論文中國現代國際關係研究所反恐怖研究中心編，《國際重大恐怖案例分析》，北京，時事出版社。陳鴻瑜，《新加坡史》，臺北，臺灣商務印書館，2011年。陳欣之，《東南亞安全》，台北，生智出版，1999。李彬，〈武器擴散與軍備擴張〉，閻學通、金德湘主編，《東亞和平與安全》，北京，時事出版社出版，2005年。林佾靜，〈911後，亞太區域安全體制的變動與延續〉，2004年4月22日，收錄於：《2004年台灣的東南亞區域研究年度研討會論文集》，台北：淡江大學東南亞研究所(主辦)，中央研究院亞太區域研究專題中心（合辦）、國立暨南國際大學東南亞研究所(合辦)、國立中山大學東南亞研究中心（合辦）。林詩凱，《「九一一」事件後新加坡「反恐」策略之研究》，暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文，2006年。夏立平著，《亞太軍備控制與安全》，上海，上海人民出版社出版，2002年。三、期刊論文吳彥華，〈專訪新加坡戰略專家柯宗元─強權幻滅獨立建軍〉，《亞洲週刊》，第37期，2000年9月17日。孫國祥、賴岳謙、童振源、陳世民、黃奎博著，《亞太綜合安全年報2002-2003》，台北：遠景基金會、嘉義：南華大學亞太研究所，2003年6月。張亞中、孫國祥著，《亞太綜合安全年報2001-2002》，台北：遠景基金會、嘉義：南華大學亞太研究所，2002年6月。陳佩修，「當前國際恐怖主義對亞洲國家的威脅與影響─以東南亞區域為例」，「『九一一』三週年之觀察與省思─全球恐怖主義與國際反恐現況分析」，中華歐亞基金會主辦，臺中，2004年九月。陳鴻瑜，〈新加坡的外交政策〉，《問題與研究》，第28卷，第10期，1989年7月。───，〈後冷戰時期東南亞之區域安全〉，《戰略與國際研究季刊》，臺灣綜合研究院與國際研究所，第1卷，第1期，1999年1月。謝福進，〈東亞政經情況─區域反恐與經濟競合〉，《亞太形勢發展與展望：2002-2003》，遠景基金會，頁51。翁履中，《新加坡綜合安全戰略之研究》，淡江大學東南亞研究所碩士論文，2004年。〈經典戰車－各國改良型豹二戰車巡禮（三）〉，《亞太防務》12期，2009年4月。貳、英文文獻一、政府資料‘Joint Strike Fighter Acquisition: Observations on the Supplier Base.’ United Stated General Accounting Office, May 2004, pp. 3-6.National Security Coordination Centre (NSCC), The Fight Terror, Singapore’s National Security Strategy, 2004. http://app.nscs.gov.sg/public/download.ashx?id=48U.S. Defense Dept., Network-centric Warfare: Creating a Decisive Warfighting Advantage. Washington, D.C.: Office of Defense Transformation, 2003.Singapore Ministry of Defence, Defending Singapore in 21st Century. Singapore: Ministry of Defence, 2010.Office of Force Transformation, Military Transformation: A Strategic Approach. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Fall 2003.二、專書與專書論文Defence of Singapore 1994-95. Singapore: Ministry of Defence, 1994).Antolik, Michael, ASEAN and the Diplomacy of Accommodation. U.S.: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.,1990.Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and Strategic Studies. London: Macmillan, 1987.Creveld, Martin Van, Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. to the Present. London Collier Macmillan, 1989.DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The University of Chicago Press, 1991.Farrell, Theo, ‘Culture and Military Power’, Review of International Studies, 24/3 (1998), pp. 407-416.Finnemore, Martha, ‘Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism,’ International Organization, 50/3 (1996), pp. 339-342.Goldman, Emily O., Information Revolution in military Affair: Prospects for Asia. Manuscript, prepared for the Office of Net Assessment, U.S. Defense Dept., 2003.Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Lynn, John A. ‘The Evolution of Army Style in the Modern West, 800-2000,’ International History Review, 18/3 (August 1996), pp. 509.Mazarr, Michael J., Jeffrey Shaffer, and Benjamin Ederington, The Military Technical Revolution. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 1993.Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas & Francisco O. Ramirez, ‘World Society and the Nation-State,’ American Journal of Sociology, 193/2 (1997), pp. 144-181.Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Sekhon, Harinder, ‘America’s Role in Asia,’ in Daljit Singh eds., Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia, 2007, pp. 37-47.Singh, Daljit, ‘Asia-Pacific Political and Security Dynamics,’ in Daljit Singh eds., Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia, 2007, pp. 25-36.---------------, ‘Southeast Asian Security: An Overview,’ Regional Outlook: Southeast Asia 2008/2009, (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008).Sridharan, Kripa,“India-ASEAN Relations: Evolution, Growth, and Prospects,” in Jeshurun Chandran eds., China, India, Japan and the Security of Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of South-east Asian Studies, 1993.Tan, Andrew, “The New Terrorism: Implication and Strategies,” in Andrew Tan & Kumar Ramakrishna eds., The New Terrorism: Anatomy, Trends and Counter-Strategies. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2002, pp. 234-45.--------------, “Terrorism in the Asia-Pacific: Treat and Response-The Singapore Experience,” in Rohan Gunaratna eds., Terrorism in the Asia-Pacific: Treat and Response. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2003, pp. 226-48.--------------, “The New Terrorism: How Southeast Asia Can Counter It,” in Uwe Johannen, Alan Smith & James Gomez eds., September 11 & Political Freedom: Asian Perspectives. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2002, pp. 86-115.Tin, Maung Maung Than, ‘Political and Security in Southeast Asia: Trend and Challenges,’ in Daljit Singh eds., Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia, 2007, pp. 80-100.Tow, William T., Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Walt, Stephen, The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.三、期刊論文‘Interview with Major General Ng Chee Meng (Chief of Air Force, RSAF),’ Asian Defence Journal, (October 2010), pp. 12-13.Ang, Chee Wee, ‘The Future of Southeast Asian Multilateralism: Towards a Security Community?’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 35/3(2009), pp. 45-62.Ball, Desmond, ‘Arms and Affluence: Military Acquisitions in the Asia-Pacific Region,’ International Security, 18/3 (Winter 1993/94).Bitzinger, Richard A., ‘Come the Revolution – Transforming the Asia-Pacific’s Militaries,’ Naval War College Review, 58/4 (Autumn 2005), pp. 39-60.Boot, Max, ‘The Stuggle to Transform the Military,’ Foreign Affairs, 84/2 (March/April 2005).Cimbala, Stephen J., ‘Transformation in Concept and Policy,’ Joint Force Quarterly 32 (Autumn 2002), pp. 70.DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,’ American Sociological Review, 48: 2 (April 1983).International Institute of Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 1995-1996. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Studies, 1995.International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2000/2001. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Studies, 2000.International Institute of Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2010. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Studies, 2010.International Institute of Strategic Studies, the, The Military Balance 2011. London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Strategic Studies, 2011.Jervis, Robert, ‘Security Regimes’, International Organization, 36/2(Spring 1982).Joyce, Mark, ‘Transforming Transformation: American Trend and Transatlantic Implications,’ RUSI Newsbrief, 24/7(July 2004).Hundley, Richard O., ‘Past Revolutions, Future Transformations.’ Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 1999.Mak, J. N., and B. A. Hamzah, ‘The External Maritime Dimension of ASEAN Security’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 18/3(September 1995).Ng, Chee Khern, ‘Safety and the RSAF Transformation,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 34/1(2008), pp. 5-15.--------------------, ‘Smaller Air Force and the Future of Air Power – A Perspective from Singapore,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 34/3(2008), pp. 5-12.Ng, Roland, Liau Eng Soon, Poh Li San, Ng Boon Ching & Timothy Ang, ‘The 3rd Generation RSAF: Managing Transformational Tensions,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/1(2007), pp. 13-24.Pudas, Terry J., ‘Disruptive Challenges and Accelerating Force Transformation,’ Joint Forces Quarterly 42(July 2006), pp. 47.Perry, William, “Desert Storm and Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, 70/ 4(Fall 1991).Raudzens, George, ‘War-Winning Weapons: The Measurement of Technological Determinism in Military History,’ Journal of Military History, 54/3(1990), pp. 403-433.Rumsfeld, Donald H., ‘Transforming the Military,’ Foreign Affair, 81/3(May/June 2002), pp. 21-27.Szafranski, Richard, ‘Peer Competitors, the RMA, and New Concepts: Some Questions,’ Naval War College Review, 49/2(Spring 1996), pp. 118.Talbot, David, ‘How Technology Failed in Iraq,’ Technology Review (November 2004).Tan, Ying Kiat, Lee Siew Hui, Aldrin Tan & Tay Shulin, ‘Enhancing Integration in Transformation,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/1(2007), pp. 25-34.Tan, Kai Hoe, ‘Naval Transformation: Progress, Prospects and People,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 34/2(2007), pp. 5-13.Wong, Gareth, ‘Beyond the Velvet Curtain of Transformation – How the Future of Warfare will be Shaped,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/3(2007), pp. 44-65.四、新聞與網路資料‘Operationalisation of the First Motorised Infantry Battalion.’ MINDEF Singapore. May 31, 2011. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2011/may/31may11_nr.html‘RSN - Assets - Unmanned Surface Vehicles.’ MINDEF Singapore. June 2, 2010. Retrieved 15 September. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/content/imindef/mindef_websites/atoz`listings/navy/assets/unmannedsurfacevehicles.html‘Russia dominates Asian market with 28 diesel subs’, April 6, 2010. http://rusnavy.com/news/navy/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=9667‘Singapore finally opts for F-15T’, Flight International, September 13, 2005. http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2005/09/13/201504/singapore-finally-opts-for-f-15t.html‘Singapore Signs Letter of Intent for Joint Strike Fighter Programme.’ MINDEF Singapore, April 19, 2006. Retrieved: June 16, 2010. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2003/feb/22feb03_nr2.htmlChew, Men Leong, ‘Navies and Maritime Security – A Republic of Singapore Navy Perspective,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 33/3(2007). See http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2007/v33n3/feature1.htmlLiang, Lim Wui & Lim Yong, ‘German tanks to add punch to SAF arsenal,’ The Straits Times, December 12, 2006.Huxley, Tim, ‘Singapore and the Revolution in Military Affair: an outsider’s perspective,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 30/1(2004). See http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2004/v30n1/features/feature4.htmlNeisloss, Liz ‘Robert Gates warns of possible clashes in the South China Sea’, CNN, June 4, 2011. http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/06/04/china.gates.visit/index.html?hpt=hp_t2‘Operationalisation of the First Motorised Infantry Battalion,’ MINDEF Singapore, May 31, 2011. http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/2011/may/31may11_nr.htmlSingh, Deep, ‘The SAF’s Experiences in Peace Support Operations,’ Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 30/4(2004). http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2004/v30n4/features/feature4.html zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202101764 en_US
