Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 增進風險調整報酬的永續主題策略之研究
A Study on the Sustainable Investing Strategy of Enhancing Risk-Adjusted Return
作者 黃晨綱
Huang, Chen-Gang
貢獻者 李志宏
黃晨綱
Huang, Chen-Gang
關鍵詞 ESG
SRI
主流永續策略
基金
風險調整報酬
ESG
SRI
Mainstream sustainable investment strategies
Funds
Risk-adjusted returns
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Mar-2022 16:40:36 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究探討主流永續投資策略之基金是否較非使用主流永續投資策略之基金有較佳之風險調整報酬。結果顯示,CAPM模型中,有採主流永續投資策略之基金並不具較佳的Alpha表現,在將穩健性檢定下,也得出並採用主流永續投資策略與Alpha間並無顯著關聯。
The study examines whether funds with mainstream sustainable investing strategies have better risk-adjusted returns than funds that do not use mainstream sustainable investing strategies. The results show that in the CAPM model, funds that adopt mainstream sustainable investment strategies do not have better Alpha performance. Under the robustness test, it is also concluded that there is no significant correlation between adopting mainstream sustainable investment strategies and Alpha performance.
參考文獻 1.Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103.
2.Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 162-185.
3.Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2021). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-36.
4.Barnett, M. L., and Salomon, R. M. (2006). “Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 27 (11): 1101-1122.
5.Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751-1767.
6.Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F., & Thomas, R. (2008). Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1729-1775.
7.Capelle‐Blancard, G., & Monjon, S. (2014). The performance of socially responsible funds: does the screening process matter?. European Financial Management, 20(3), 494-520.
8.Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004). Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276-1302.
9.Clarkin, J. E., & Cangioni, C. L. (2016). Impact investing: A primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135-173.
10.Cole, S., Melecky, M., Mölders, F., & Reed, T. (2020). Long-run Returns to Impact Investing in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (No. w27870). National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.Eckhart, M. (2020). Financial Regulations and ESG Investing: Looking Back and Forward. In Values at Work (pp. 211-228). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
12.Eurosif. (2014). European SRI study. Brussels: Eurosif.
13.Fabozzi, F. J., Ma, K. C., & Oliphant, B. J. (2008). Sin stock returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 82-94.
14.Fama, E. F. (1960). Efficient market hypothesis. Diss. PhD Thesis, Ph. D. dissertation.
15.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56.
16.Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach.
17.Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
18.Global Sustainable Investment Alliance(2020). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2020.
19.Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of financial economics, 93(1), 15-36
20.Ielasi, F., Rossolini, M., & Limberti, S. (2018). Sustainability-themed mutual funds: an empirical examination of risk and performance. The Journal of Risk Finance.
21.Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2019). Responsible or thematic? The true nature of sustainability-themed mutual funds. Sustainability, 11(12), 3304.
22.Kaiser, L. (2020). ESG integration: value, growth and momentum. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 32-51.
23.Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection in The Journal of Finance Vol. 7.
24.Martin, M. (2013). Making impact investible.
25.Matallín-Sáez, J. C., Soler-Domínguez, A., Tortosa-Ausina, E., & de Mingo-López, D. V. (2019). Ethical strategy focus and mutual fund management: Performance and persistence. Journal of cleaner production, 213, 618-633.
26.Nelson, J. M. (2006). The “CalPERS effect” revisited again. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 187-213.
27.Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1986). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelationconsistent covariance matrix.
28.Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180-193.
29.Principles for Responsible Investment. Principles for Responsible Investment Annual Report 2021.
30.Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of banking & finance, 32(9), 1723-1742.
31.Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of corporate finance, 14(3), 302-322.
32.Sandberg, J., Juravle, C., Hedesström, T. M., & Hamilton, I. (2009). The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 519-533.
33.Townsend, B. (2020). From sri to esg: The origins of socially responsible and sustainable investing. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 1(1), 10-25.
34.Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525-533.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理學系
108357030
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108357030
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李志宏zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃晨綱zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang, Chen-Gangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 黃晨綱zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huang, Chen-Gangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2022 16:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Mar-2022 16:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2022 16:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108357030en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139142-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 108357030zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究探討主流永續投資策略之基金是否較非使用主流永續投資策略之基金有較佳之風險調整報酬。結果顯示,CAPM模型中,有採主流永續投資策略之基金並不具較佳的Alpha表現,在將穩健性檢定下,也得出並採用主流永續投資策略與Alpha間並無顯著關聯。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The study examines whether funds with mainstream sustainable investing strategies have better risk-adjusted returns than funds that do not use mainstream sustainable investing strategies. The results show that in the CAPM model, funds that adopt mainstream sustainable investment strategies do not have better Alpha performance. Under the robustness test, it is also concluded that there is no significant correlation between adopting mainstream sustainable investment strategies and Alpha performance.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 7
第一節 研究動機與目的 7
第二節 研究架構 8
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 永續投資 9
第二節 參與公司治理 10
第三節 ESG整合 11
第四節 影響力投資 11
第五節 篩選策略 12
第六節 永續主題投資 13
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 研究樣本 14
第二節 研究假說 16
第三節 實證模型 17
第四章 實證結果分析 19
第一節 敘述統計 19
第二節 實證結果分析 21
第五章 結論 24
第一節 研究結論 24
第二節 研究限制與建議 24
第六章 附錄 25
參考文獻 27
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1107928 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108357030en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ESGzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) SRIzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主流永續策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 基金zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險調整報酬zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ESGen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) SRIen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mainstream sustainable investment strategiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Fundsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Risk-adjusted returnsen_US
dc.title (題名) 增進風險調整報酬的永續主題策略之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on the Sustainable Investing Strategy of Enhancing Risk-Adjusted Returnen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103.
2.Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 162-185.
3.Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2021). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-36.
4.Barnett, M. L., and Salomon, R. M. (2006). “Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 27 (11): 1101-1122.
5.Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751-1767.
6.Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F., & Thomas, R. (2008). Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1729-1775.
7.Capelle‐Blancard, G., & Monjon, S. (2014). The performance of socially responsible funds: does the screening process matter?. European Financial Management, 20(3), 494-520.
8.Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004). Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276-1302.
9.Clarkin, J. E., & Cangioni, C. L. (2016). Impact investing: A primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135-173.
10.Cole, S., Melecky, M., Mölders, F., & Reed, T. (2020). Long-run Returns to Impact Investing in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (No. w27870). National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.Eckhart, M. (2020). Financial Regulations and ESG Investing: Looking Back and Forward. In Values at Work (pp. 211-228). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
12.Eurosif. (2014). European SRI study. Brussels: Eurosif.
13.Fabozzi, F. J., Ma, K. C., & Oliphant, B. J. (2008). Sin stock returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 82-94.
14.Fama, E. F. (1960). Efficient market hypothesis. Diss. PhD Thesis, Ph. D. dissertation.
15.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56.
16.Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach.
17.Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
18.Global Sustainable Investment Alliance(2020). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2020.
19.Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of financial economics, 93(1), 15-36
20.Ielasi, F., Rossolini, M., & Limberti, S. (2018). Sustainability-themed mutual funds: an empirical examination of risk and performance. The Journal of Risk Finance.
21.Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2019). Responsible or thematic? The true nature of sustainability-themed mutual funds. Sustainability, 11(12), 3304.
22.Kaiser, L. (2020). ESG integration: value, growth and momentum. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 32-51.
23.Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection in The Journal of Finance Vol. 7.
24.Martin, M. (2013). Making impact investible.
25.Matallín-Sáez, J. C., Soler-Domínguez, A., Tortosa-Ausina, E., & de Mingo-López, D. V. (2019). Ethical strategy focus and mutual fund management: Performance and persistence. Journal of cleaner production, 213, 618-633.
26.Nelson, J. M. (2006). The “CalPERS effect” revisited again. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 187-213.
27.Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1986). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelationconsistent covariance matrix.
28.Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180-193.
29.Principles for Responsible Investment. Principles for Responsible Investment Annual Report 2021.
30.Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of banking & finance, 32(9), 1723-1742.
31.Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of corporate finance, 14(3), 302-322.
32.Sandberg, J., Juravle, C., Hedesström, T. M., & Hamilton, I. (2009). The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 519-533.
33.Townsend, B. (2020). From sri to esg: The origins of socially responsible and sustainable investing. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 1(1), 10-25.
34.Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525-533.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200176en_US