學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 How do auditors respond to accounting restatements? Evidence on audit staff allocation
作者 戚務君; 潘健民
Chi, Wuchun; Pan, Chien-min Kevin
貢獻者 會計系
關鍵詞 Restatement;Misstatement;Audit inputs;Staff allocation
日期 2021-08
上傳時間 12-Apr-2022 09:24:10 (UTC+8)
摘要 We examine how auditors respond to accounting restatements using audit input data from Japan. We find that audit fees, the number of Certified Public Accountant (CPA) licensed staff, and the number of signing partners are higher for firms in the restatement year than in the year prior to the restatement. Our results also reveal that the increase in audit fees and the higher numbers of CPA-licensed staff and signing partners persist after the restatement year. The results are robust after excluding dismissal of auditors subsequent to the occurrence of restatements. We further find that client firms are not able to gain a fee discount but will be audited by greater numbers of partners if they switch auditors after the restatement. We also obtain consistent results using propensity score matching. Overall, our findings suggest that audit firms increase audit inputs (i.e., higher fees and more experienced staff with a CPA license) in response to their own mistakes (i.e., accounting restatements). Taken together, the results suggest that the increased audit fees may reflect the increase in the risks, but not the risks alone.
關聯 Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 58, 847-879
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-01011-1
dc.contributor 會計系-
dc.creator (作者) 戚務君; 潘健民-
dc.creator (作者) Chi, Wuchun; Pan, Chien-min Kevin-
dc.date (日期) 2021-08-
dc.date.accessioned 12-Apr-2022 09:24:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Apr-2022 09:24:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Apr-2022 09:24:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139881-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) We examine how auditors respond to accounting restatements using audit input data from Japan. We find that audit fees, the number of Certified Public Accountant (CPA) licensed staff, and the number of signing partners are higher for firms in the restatement year than in the year prior to the restatement. Our results also reveal that the increase in audit fees and the higher numbers of CPA-licensed staff and signing partners persist after the restatement year. The results are robust after excluding dismissal of auditors subsequent to the occurrence of restatements. We further find that client firms are not able to gain a fee discount but will be audited by greater numbers of partners if they switch auditors after the restatement. We also obtain consistent results using propensity score matching. Overall, our findings suggest that audit firms increase audit inputs (i.e., higher fees and more experienced staff with a CPA license) in response to their own mistakes (i.e., accounting restatements). Taken together, the results suggest that the increased audit fees may reflect the increase in the risks, but not the risks alone.-
dc.format.extent 870800 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 58, 847-879-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Restatement;Misstatement;Audit inputs;Staff allocation-
dc.title (題名) How do auditors respond to accounting restatements? Evidence on audit staff allocation-
dc.type (資料類型) article-
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1007/s11156-021-01011-1-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-01011-1-