1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 集團成員如何轉虧為盈?--集團總部關注與資源調配之探討
How do members of business groups turnaround?--The impact of headquarters attention and resource allocation
作者 徐慶懿
Hsu, Ching-Yi
貢獻者 于卓民<br>黃國峯
Yu, Chwo-Ming Joseph<br>Huang, Kuo-Feng
徐慶懿
Hsu, Ching-Yi
關鍵詞 轉虧為盈
集團總部關注
資源調配
企業集團
集團成員
Turnaround
Attention of group headquarters
Resource allocation
Business groups
Group members
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Jul-2022 15:57:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 從集團總部的角度，由於資源的限制，必須掌握整個企業集團的發展方向，並審慎評估將資源投入到哪些事業，進而創造集團成員的綜效和集團的最大利益，因此集團總部會關注集團成員的表現。以資源基礎觀點來看，企業集團所擁有的有形資源及無形資源遠比集團成員豐沛，而有形資源包括財務資源和實體資源，無形資源則包括技術、品牌、聲譽及人力資源等。
當集團成員經營績效不佳且虧損時，若企業集團能適度進行資源調配來協助，將有助集團成員轉虧為盈。面對集團不同成員的發展潛力及經營瓶頸，集團總部如何運用集團資源，在集團策略的指導下進行適當協助，讓績效表現佳的成員能夠表現更好，讓績效表現不佳的成員能夠變得更好，集團成員同心協力，以提升集團整體競爭優勢，是非常重要的實務議題和研究課題。
集團總部關注(attention)係指企業集團注意到集團成員並投入時間和精力，因此對集團成員的關注是集團總部的一項關鍵決策。然而，不同集團成員所擁有的資源並不相同，而集團總部的關注也不同(如挹注資源的多寡)，這些可能會導致集團成員的績效差異。藉由集團總部關注，若集團成員連續虧損多年，集團總部也會評估集團成員經理人能力是否不足或是確實無法改變現況，為了確保能改善績效，企業集團經常會採取更換集團成員經理人作為推動轉虧為盈策略的手段。
本研究採用個案研究法，以國內知名企業集團之集團成員為研究對象，針對該企業集團的不同產業及規模的四家集團成員個案，分別針對每個個案轉虧為盈的過程進行深度研究，對於個案的背景、績效不佳原因、重要經營改善事件、利害相關人和集團資源調配的策略探討其因果關係。
個案研究發現，集團總部與集團成員之間透過以下七種活動產生互動:策略指導和支持、資源和服務投入、集團領導人網絡投入、集團成員經理人網絡投入、人才資料庫建立與調配、關係企業協調與綜效建立及外部合作夥伴網絡支持。當集團成員在經營上發生問題時，集團總部可以用上述檢視可著力之處。根據分析結果，本研究提出集團總部關注及調配資源以協助集團成員轉虧為盈的完整架構，輔以所整理出之研究發現，有助於企業集團在面對集團成員持續虧損時，透過關注及調配資源來轉虧為盈。
For a business group headquarters, due to limited resources, it is necessary to carry out strategic development to grasp the development direction of the group, and carefully evaluate which businesses to invest, to create the synergy among group members and enhance the performance of the group. Therefore, a group headquarters will pay attention to the performance of its group members. From the perspective of resource-based view, tangible resources (e.g., financial resources and physical resources) and intangible resources (e.g., technology, brand, reputation, and human resources) of the group are far more abundant than those group members.
When group members experience poor performance and incur losses, if the group headquarters can properly allocate resources to assist, it will help the group members to turnaround. Facing the development potential and operational bottlenecks of different group members, how can the group headquarters use its resources to provide appropriate assistance under the guidance of the group`s strategy, so that the group members can turnaround, leading to better performance of the group? This issue is a worthy research topic and with significant implications to practices.
The attention of a group headquarters means that the group headquarters pays attention to its group members and invests time and energy. Therefore, the attention paying to group members is a key decision of a group headquarters. Due to the differences in firm resources of its various group members, the attention by the group headquarters are different. If a group member has been losing money for many years, the group headquarters will evaluate whether the managers of the group member are incompetent or the current situation is indeed unchangeable. In order to ensure improving performance, the group headquarters often replaces the top management to develop turnaround strategies.
This study adopts a case study method and examines four money loosing group members of a well-known business group in Taiwan as the research subjects, with different size and industry-setting. For each case, the background, the reasons for poor performance, measures and strategies taken to improve performances, and the activities of the business headquarters are examined and the causal relationships are developed. .
The study finds that the group headquarters and group members interacted with each other through the following seven activities: strategic guidance and support, resources and services input, group leader’s network input, group members managers’ network input, talent pool establishment and deployment, group members coordination and synergy establishment, and external partner network support. When group members encounter problems in operations, group headquarters can rely on which of these activities to they can focus on. Based on the research findings, this study proposes a comprehensive framework for group headquarters to pay attention and allocate resources to group members in order to help them turnaround. In addition, this study offers practical implications to business headquarters as well as managers of group members to turn businesses around.
參考文獻 一、中文部分
于卓民(2021)，｢打破組織慣性是逆轉之鑰｣，財訊，641期，44。
王之杰(2008)，｢宅配通靠全溫層，三年轉虧為盈｣，今周刊，591期，取自
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article-content-80393-117336
王郁倫(2019)，｢東元集團第8隻小金雞上市!東捷的誕生，來自一場部門大吵
架｣，數位時代，取自
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/56060/itts-teco-group-history--ipo-event
王柔雅(2016)，｢燦坤開餐廳 虧四億的失敗學｣，商業週刊，1489期，取自
https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/Archive/Article?StrId=61739
台灣宅配通股份有限公司(110)，台灣宅配通股份有限公司109年報。
李貴惠、于卓民、司徒達賢(2007)，｢內外部網絡對於多國公司在台子公司角
色演化的影響｣，交大管理評論，27(2)，169-201。
呂國禎、吳靜芳(2020)，｢2020《天下》兩千大調查 最強五十大集團｣，天下
雜誌，698期，62。
杜蕙蓉(2020)，｢黃茂雄:核心技術、國際化是永續關鍵｣，工商時報，取自
https://ctee.com.tw/people/interview/307560.html
李吉仁、王淑玲(2022)，｢企業華麗轉身，需要雙引擎助力｣，哈佛商業評論，
186期，44-51。
李瑞華(2021)，｢公司治理的權與責｣，哈佛商業評論，取自
https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0010401.html
東元電機股份有限公司(110)，東元電機股份有限公司109年報。
東捷資訊股份有限公司(110)，東捷資訊股份有限公司109年報。
林仁益(2021)，開一間會賺錢的餐飲店。新北市:文經出版社有限公司。
林宏文(2018)，｢從輝煌到崩壞 大同、華映給台灣什麼啟示?｣，今周刊，1148
期，取自
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80393/post/201812150009
林讓均(2011)，｢黃茂雄顛覆(低價高速)鐵律的秘密｣，今周刊，780期，取自
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/201112010027
林鳳琪(2021)，｢一堂遲來的公司治理課，大同百年經營權走向共治｣，遠見雜
誌，取自
https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/5235453
吳怡靜(1998)，｢企業綜效，是機會或幻影？｣，天下雜誌，211期。取自
https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5106562
徐景輝、于卓民、羅明琇(2021)，｢海榮國際股份有限公司-供應鏈危機｣，
產業與管理論壇，23(2)，52-70。
徐慶懿、于卓民(2021)，｢安心電氣的轉虧為盈｣，10-CC-03，政大商管個案中
心。
陳建男、朱文儀(2012)，｢大型集團企業之成員競爭優勢:資源、控制與內部市
場｣，中山管理評論，20(3)，775-809。
陳律睿、何祖平、周祐賢(2016)，｢管理才能與組織成員更換意願之關聯性研究─以管理者更迭類型為干擾變數｣，北商學報，27～30期，81-99。
張彥文(2018)，看六類領導人 如何運籌帷幄，哈佛商業評論，取自
https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/18181/six-types-of-leaders
張義宮(2019)，｢智慧經營／東捷資訊董事長高尚偉 同理心、得客心｣，經濟日報，取自
https://www.itts.com.tw/en/news/372-2019-07-16-01-33-55
黃日燦(2021)，企業創生台灣走新路。臺北市:商周出版。
經理人月刊編輯部（2007），5大企業家的魅力領導 重細節、基本功，經理人月刊，取自
https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/542
楊雅民(2013)，｢東元打造安悅生活廣場｣，自由時報，取自
https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/710995
蔣曜宇(2020)，｢【東元電機】引進送餐機器人、人造肉！一個做馬達起家的
外行人，如何讓摩斯更強大？｣，數位時代，取自
https://teba.org.tw/news/teba-media-report/2020-04-10/
顏瓊真(2012)，｢黃茂雄搭ECFA順風車 宅配通9月登陸｣，理財周刊，取自
https://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/aSGuest53774-435798-515
二、英文部分
Abebe, M. A. (2009). “Leadership characteristics of declining firms attempting turnaround: An empirical examination,” Journal of Strategy and Management, 2(3), 201-216.
Abebe, M. A. (2012). “Executive attention patterns, environmental dynamism and corporate turnaround performance,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(7), 684-701.
Abebe, M. A. & Tangpong, C. (2018). “Founder-CEOs and corporate turnaround among declining firms,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(1), 45-57.
Ambos, T.C. & Brikinshaw, J. (2010). “Headquarter’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance,” Management International Review, 50(4), 449-469.
Anderson, D. & Ackerman A. L. (2010). Beyond Change Management: How to Achieve Breakthrough Results Through Conscious Change Leadership, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Arogyswamy, K., Barker, V. L. & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1995). “Firm turnrounds: an intergrative two-stage model”, Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 493-525.
Balogun, J. & Hailey, V. H. (2004). Exploring Strategic Change, 2nd ed., London: Prentice-Hall.
Barry, M. S. (1976). “Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (1), 27-44.
Berns, K.V.D., & Klarner, P. (2017). “A review of the CEO succession literature and a future research program,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2), 83–108.
Bhattacharyya, S. S. & Malik, A. (2020). “Development of an intergrated canvas on turnaround strategy,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(2), 523-554.
Bibeault, D. B. (1982). Corporate Turnaround: How managers Turn Loser Into Winners, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bouquet, C. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). “Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters,” Academy of management Journal, 51(3), 577-601.
Bouquet, C., Barsoux, J. L. & Levy, O. (2015) “The perils of attention from headquarters,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(2), 16-18
Boyd, D. P. (2011). “Lessons from turnaround leaders,” Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 36-43.
Cai, J. & Nguyen, T. (2018). “Disciplinary directors: Evidence from the appointments of outside directors who have fired CEOs,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 96, 221-235.
Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A. & Kim, M. U. 1987). “Organizational dysfunctions of decline,” Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 126-138.
Campbell, A. & Goold, M. (1995). “The quest for parenting advantage,” Havard Business Review, 73(2), 120-132.
Campbell, A., Goold, M. & Alexander, M. (1995). “The value of the parent company,” California Management Review, 38 (1), 79-97.
Chowdhury, S. D. (2002). “Turnarounds: a atage theory perspective,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 19(3), 249-266.
Dunphy, D. & Stace, D. (1993). “The strategic management of corporate change,” Human Relations, 46(8), 905-918.
Feldman, E. R. (2021). “The corporate parenting advantage, revisited,” Strategy Management Journal, 42, 114-143.
Galpin, T. (2019). “Strategy beyond the business unit level: corporate parenting in focus,” Journal of Business Strategy, 40 (3), 43-51.
Georgalis, J., Samaratunge, R., Kimberley, N. & Lu, Y. (2015). “Change process characteristics and resistance to organizational change: the role of employee perception of justice.” Australian Journal of Management, 40, 89-113.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate Level Strategy: Creating Value in The Multibusiness Company, New York: Wiley.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1995). “Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage,” Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 120-132.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1995). “The value of parent company,” California Management Review, 38(1), 79-97.
Gotteiner, S., Mas-Machuca, M. & Marimon, F. (2019). “Fighting organizational decline: a risk-based approach to organizational anti-aging,” Management Research Review, 42(11), 1259-1277.
Herri, Johan, A. P., Handika, R. F. & Yulihasri (2017). “CEOs characteristics and the successful of turnaround strategy: evidences from Indonesia,” Academy of
Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 69-80.
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regner, P. (2017).
Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases, 11th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A. & Jick, T. D. (1992). The Challenge of Oganization Change. New York: The Free Press.
Kierulff, H. & Petersen, H. (2009). “Finance is everything: advice from turnaround managers,” Journal of Business Strategy, 30(6), 44-51.
Kamel, Y. M. (2005). A Comparative Study of The Impact of Turnaround Strategies and Leadership Factors on Successful Corporate Turnarounds, Chicago, IL: Benedictine University Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kruehler, M. & Pidun, U. (2011). “Parenting approaches in corporate strategy: An exploratory study on the impact of portfolio structure and culture,” Schmalenbach Business Review, 3, 69-91.
Kruehler, M., Pidun, U. & Rubner, H. (2012). “How to assess the corporate parenting strategy? A conceptual answer,” Journal of Business Strategy, 33(4), 4-17.
Laucer, T. (2021). Change Management. Fundamentals and Success Factors. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Gmbh.
Luecke, R. (2003). Managing Change and Transition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Luo, B., Wnag, Q., Lu, L. & Liang, L. (2015). “How to win the attention of top executives: The interaction of an issue’s characteristics and environmental threats,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 970-992.
Metz, M. (2021). “Overview of change in organizations. Resistance to change. a literature review,” Oviuius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 11(1),
611-620.
Moran, J. W. & Brightman, B. K. (2001). “Leading organizational change,” Career Development International, 6(2), 111-118.
Murphy, Gregory B. & Tocher, Neil (2011). “Corporate parents, initial legitimacy, and resource acquisition in small and medium Firms: an empirical examination,” New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14 (1), 23-34.
Nyagiloh, K. A. & Kilika J. M. (2020). “Theoretical review of turnaround strategy and its organization outcomes,” International Business Research, 13(2), 13-34.
Ocasio, W. (1997). “Towards an attention-based of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(Summer Special Issue), 187-206.
Panicker, S. & Manimala, M. J. (2015). “Successful turnarounds: the role of appropriate entrepreneurial strategies,” Journal of Strategy and Management,
8(1), 21-40.
Pearce, J. A. & Robbins, K. (1993). “Toward improved theory and research on business turnaround,” Journal of Management, 19(3), 613-636.
Oakland, J. S. & Tanner, S. (2007), “Successful change management,” Total Quality Management, 18(1-2), 1-19.
Prasad, V. (2006), “Role of HR in corporate turnaround,” HRM Review, 7(1), 11-29.
Ramanujam, V. & Varadarajan, P. (1989). “Research on corporate diversification: a synthesis,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, 523-551.
Reinganum, M. R. (1985). “The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 46-60.
Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., Martocchio, J. J. & Long, L. K. (2018). Management.
14th edition, London, UK: Pearson Education.
Salloum, Z. Z. (2019). Examining Under-Distress Firms Performance and Origin of Successor CEO: Quantitative Study, San Diego, CA: Northcentral University
Press.
Schepker, D. J., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Thatcher, S. M. B. & Campion, M. C. (2017).
“CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: a meta-analysis,” The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 701-720.
Schepker, D. J., Nyberg, A. J., Ulrich, M. D. & Wright, P. M. (2018). “Planning for future leadership: Procedural rationality, formalized succession processes, and CEO
influence in CEO succession planning,” Academy of Management Journal,
61(2), 523-552.
Schweizer, L. & Nienhaus, A. (2017). “Corporate distress and turnaround : integrating the literature and directing future research,” Business Research, 10(1), 3-47.
Senior, B. (2002). Organisational Change, 2nd ed. London: Prentice Hall.
Sundus, T.K., Sarah, S.R. & Shaju, G. (2017). “Resistance to change in organizations: a case of General Motors amd Nokia,” International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 7(1), 16-25.
Todnem, R. (2005), “Organisational change management: a critical review,” Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369-380.
Trahms, C., Ndofor, H. & Sirmon, D. (2013). “Organizational decline and turnround: a review and agenda for future research.” Journal of Management, 39(5), 1277-1307.
Wen, L. (2004). CEO Succession and Financial Performance in Troubled Firms, Cabondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Weng, D. H. & Cheng, H. L. (2021). “Does fairness narrow the gap? Effect of procedural justice on MNE attention disparity.” Global Strategy Journal, 1-29.
Weitzel, W. & Jonsson, E. (1989). “Decline in organizations: a literature integration and extension.” Administive Science Quterly, 34(1), 91-109.
Wood, J. & Vilkinas, T. (2005). “Characteristics associated with success: CEOs’ perspectives,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(3/4), 186-196.
Yan, A. & Gray, B. (1994). “Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: a comparative case study,” Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478-1517.
Yu, Y., Liu, Y. & Bai, T. (2019). “Does attention from headquarters influence subsidiary behavior? A social psychology perspective,” Long Range Planning, 52(4), 101877.
Zhou, Y. M. (2011). “Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices,” Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 624-639.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
企業管理學系
108355501
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108355501
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 于卓民<br>黃國峯zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Chwo-Ming Joseph<br>Huang, Kuo-Fengen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 徐慶懿zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Ching-Yien_US
dc.creator (作者) 徐慶懿zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Ching-Yien_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Jul-2022 15:57:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Jul-2022 15:57:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jul-2022 15:57:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108355501en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140543-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 108355501zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 從集團總部的角度，由於資源的限制，必須掌握整個企業集團的發展方向，並審慎評估將資源投入到哪些事業，進而創造集團成員的綜效和集團的最大利益，因此集團總部會關注集團成員的表現。以資源基礎觀點來看，企業集團所擁有的有形資源及無形資源遠比集團成員豐沛，而有形資源包括財務資源和實體資源，無形資源則包括技術、品牌、聲譽及人力資源等。
當集團成員經營績效不佳且虧損時，若企業集團能適度進行資源調配來協助，將有助集團成員轉虧為盈。面對集團不同成員的發展潛力及經營瓶頸，集團總部如何運用集團資源，在集團策略的指導下進行適當協助，讓績效表現佳的成員能夠表現更好，讓績效表現不佳的成員能夠變得更好，集團成員同心協力，以提升集團整體競爭優勢，是非常重要的實務議題和研究課題。
集團總部關注(attention)係指企業集團注意到集團成員並投入時間和精力，因此對集團成員的關注是集團總部的一項關鍵決策。然而，不同集團成員所擁有的資源並不相同，而集團總部的關注也不同(如挹注資源的多寡)，這些可能會導致集團成員的績效差異。藉由集團總部關注，若集團成員連續虧損多年，集團總部也會評估集團成員經理人能力是否不足或是確實無法改變現況，為了確保能改善績效，企業集團經常會採取更換集團成員經理人作為推動轉虧為盈策略的手段。
本研究採用個案研究法，以國內知名企業集團之集團成員為研究對象，針對該企業集團的不同產業及規模的四家集團成員個案，分別針對每個個案轉虧為盈的過程進行深度研究，對於個案的背景、績效不佳原因、重要經營改善事件、利害相關人和集團資源調配的策略探討其因果關係。
個案研究發現，集團總部與集團成員之間透過以下七種活動產生互動:策略指導和支持、資源和服務投入、集團領導人網絡投入、集團成員經理人網絡投入、人才資料庫建立與調配、關係企業協調與綜效建立及外部合作夥伴網絡支持。當集團成員在經營上發生問題時，集團總部可以用上述檢視可著力之處。根據分析結果，本研究提出集團總部關注及調配資源以協助集團成員轉虧為盈的完整架構，輔以所整理出之研究發現，有助於企業集團在面對集團成員持續虧損時，透過關注及調配資源來轉虧為盈。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) For a business group headquarters, due to limited resources, it is necessary to carry out strategic development to grasp the development direction of the group, and carefully evaluate which businesses to invest, to create the synergy among group members and enhance the performance of the group. Therefore, a group headquarters will pay attention to the performance of its group members. From the perspective of resource-based view, tangible resources (e.g., financial resources and physical resources) and intangible resources (e.g., technology, brand, reputation, and human resources) of the group are far more abundant than those group members.
When group members experience poor performance and incur losses, if the group headquarters can properly allocate resources to assist, it will help the group members to turnaround. Facing the development potential and operational bottlenecks of different group members, how can the group headquarters use its resources to provide appropriate assistance under the guidance of the group`s strategy, so that the group members can turnaround, leading to better performance of the group? This issue is a worthy research topic and with significant implications to practices.
The attention of a group headquarters means that the group headquarters pays attention to its group members and invests time and energy. Therefore, the attention paying to group members is a key decision of a group headquarters. Due to the differences in firm resources of its various group members, the attention by the group headquarters are different. If a group member has been losing money for many years, the group headquarters will evaluate whether the managers of the group member are incompetent or the current situation is indeed unchangeable. In order to ensure improving performance, the group headquarters often replaces the top management to develop turnaround strategies.
This study adopts a case study method and examines four money loosing group members of a well-known business group in Taiwan as the research subjects, with different size and industry-setting. For each case, the background, the reasons for poor performance, measures and strategies taken to improve performances, and the activities of the business headquarters are examined and the causal relationships are developed. .
The study finds that the group headquarters and group members interacted with each other through the following seven activities: strategic guidance and support, resources and services input, group leader’s network input, group members managers’ network input, talent pool establishment and deployment, group members coordination and synergy establishment, and external partner network support. When group members encounter problems in operations, group headquarters can rely on which of these activities to they can focus on. Based on the research findings, this study proposes a comprehensive framework for group headquarters to pay attention and allocate resources to group members in order to help them turnaround. In addition, this study offers practical implications to business headquarters as well as managers of group members to turn businesses around.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 誌謝 I
摘要 III
ABSTRACT V
目次 VII
表次 IX
圖次 XI
第一章 研究議題與研究貢獻 1
第一節 研究動機與背景 2
第二節 研究議題說明 4
第三節 研究目的與預期貢獻 6
第四節 研究方法與論文章節說明 8
第二章 個案分析與研究發現 17
第一節 安悅電氣個案 17
第二節 安心食品個案 30
第三節 東捷資訊個案 43
第四節 台灣宅配通個案 54
第五節 研究發現總結 69
第三章 研究發現與理論意涵 76
第一節 集團總部關注 76
第二節 經理人專業能力 84
第三節 集團總部資源調配 90
第四節 轉虧為盈解決方案 97
第五節 導入解決方案的管理 113
第六節 完整架構 126
第四章 結論與建議 130
第一節 研究結論 130
第二節 實務意涵與理論貢獻 140
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 149
參考文獻 152
一、中文部分 152
二、英文部分 155		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4525928 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108355501en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 轉虧為盈zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 集團總部關注zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源調配zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業集團zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 集團成員zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Turnarounden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Attention of group headquartersen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resource allocationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Business groupsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Group membersen_US
dc.title (題名) 集團成員如何轉虧為盈?--集團總部關注與資源調配之探討zh_TW
dc.title (題名) How do members of business groups turnaround?--The impact of headquarters attention and resource allocationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分
于卓民(2021)，｢打破組織慣性是逆轉之鑰｣，財訊，641期，44。
王之杰(2008)，｢宅配通靠全溫層，三年轉虧為盈｣，今周刊，591期，取自
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article-content-80393-117336
王郁倫(2019)，｢東元集團第8隻小金雞上市!東捷的誕生，來自一場部門大吵
架｣，數位時代，取自
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/56060/itts-teco-group-history--ipo-event
王柔雅(2016)，｢燦坤開餐廳 虧四億的失敗學｣，商業週刊，1489期，取自
https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/Archive/Article?StrId=61739
台灣宅配通股份有限公司(110)，台灣宅配通股份有限公司109年報。
李貴惠、于卓民、司徒達賢(2007)，｢內外部網絡對於多國公司在台子公司角
色演化的影響｣，交大管理評論，27(2)，169-201。
呂國禎、吳靜芳(2020)，｢2020《天下》兩千大調查 最強五十大集團｣，天下
雜誌，698期，62。
杜蕙蓉(2020)，｢黃茂雄:核心技術、國際化是永續關鍵｣，工商時報，取自
https://ctee.com.tw/people/interview/307560.html
李吉仁、王淑玲(2022)，｢企業華麗轉身，需要雙引擎助力｣，哈佛商業評論，
186期，44-51。
李瑞華(2021)，｢公司治理的權與責｣，哈佛商業評論，取自
https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0010401.html
東元電機股份有限公司(110)，東元電機股份有限公司109年報。
東捷資訊股份有限公司(110)，東捷資訊股份有限公司109年報。
林仁益(2021)，開一間會賺錢的餐飲店。新北市:文經出版社有限公司。
林宏文(2018)，｢從輝煌到崩壞 大同、華映給台灣什麼啟示?｣，今周刊，1148
期，取自
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80393/post/201812150009
林讓均(2011)，｢黃茂雄顛覆(低價高速)鐵律的秘密｣，今周刊，780期，取自
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/201112010027
林鳳琪(2021)，｢一堂遲來的公司治理課，大同百年經營權走向共治｣，遠見雜
誌，取自
https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/5235453
吳怡靜(1998)，｢企業綜效，是機會或幻影？｣，天下雜誌，211期。取自
https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5106562
徐景輝、于卓民、羅明琇(2021)，｢海榮國際股份有限公司-供應鏈危機｣，
產業與管理論壇，23(2)，52-70。
徐慶懿、于卓民(2021)，｢安心電氣的轉虧為盈｣，10-CC-03，政大商管個案中
心。
陳建男、朱文儀(2012)，｢大型集團企業之成員競爭優勢:資源、控制與內部市
場｣，中山管理評論，20(3)，775-809。
陳律睿、何祖平、周祐賢(2016)，｢管理才能與組織成員更換意願之關聯性研究─以管理者更迭類型為干擾變數｣，北商學報，27～30期，81-99。
張彥文(2018)，看六類領導人 如何運籌帷幄，哈佛商業評論，取自
https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/18181/six-types-of-leaders
張義宮(2019)，｢智慧經營／東捷資訊董事長高尚偉 同理心、得客心｣，經濟日報，取自
https://www.itts.com.tw/en/news/372-2019-07-16-01-33-55
黃日燦(2021)，企業創生台灣走新路。臺北市:商周出版。
經理人月刊編輯部（2007），5大企業家的魅力領導 重細節、基本功，經理人月刊，取自
https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/542
楊雅民(2013)，｢東元打造安悅生活廣場｣，自由時報，取自
https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/710995
蔣曜宇(2020)，｢【東元電機】引進送餐機器人、人造肉！一個做馬達起家的
外行人，如何讓摩斯更強大？｣，數位時代，取自
https://teba.org.tw/news/teba-media-report/2020-04-10/
顏瓊真(2012)，｢黃茂雄搭ECFA順風車 宅配通9月登陸｣，理財周刊，取自
https://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/aSGuest53774-435798-515
二、英文部分
Abebe, M. A. (2009). “Leadership characteristics of declining firms attempting turnaround: An empirical examination,” Journal of Strategy and Management, 2(3), 201-216.
Abebe, M. A. (2012). “Executive attention patterns, environmental dynamism and corporate turnaround performance,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(7), 684-701.
Abebe, M. A. & Tangpong, C. (2018). “Founder-CEOs and corporate turnaround among declining firms,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(1), 45-57.
Ambos, T.C. & Brikinshaw, J. (2010). “Headquarter’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance,” Management International Review, 50(4), 449-469.
Anderson, D. & Ackerman A. L. (2010). Beyond Change Management: How to Achieve Breakthrough Results Through Conscious Change Leadership, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Arogyswamy, K., Barker, V. L. & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1995). “Firm turnrounds: an intergrative two-stage model”, Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 493-525.
Balogun, J. & Hailey, V. H. (2004). Exploring Strategic Change, 2nd ed., London: Prentice-Hall.
Barry, M. S. (1976). “Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (1), 27-44.
Berns, K.V.D., & Klarner, P. (2017). “A review of the CEO succession literature and a future research program,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2), 83–108.
Bhattacharyya, S. S. & Malik, A. (2020). “Development of an intergrated canvas on turnaround strategy,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(2), 523-554.
Bibeault, D. B. (1982). Corporate Turnaround: How managers Turn Loser Into Winners, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bouquet, C. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). “Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters,” Academy of management Journal, 51(3), 577-601.
Bouquet, C., Barsoux, J. L. & Levy, O. (2015) “The perils of attention from headquarters,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(2), 16-18
Boyd, D. P. (2011). “Lessons from turnaround leaders,” Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 36-43.
Cai, J. & Nguyen, T. (2018). “Disciplinary directors: Evidence from the appointments of outside directors who have fired CEOs,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 96, 221-235.
Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A. & Kim, M. U. 1987). “Organizational dysfunctions of decline,” Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 126-138.
Campbell, A. & Goold, M. (1995). “The quest for parenting advantage,” Havard Business Review, 73(2), 120-132.
Campbell, A., Goold, M. & Alexander, M. (1995). “The value of the parent company,” California Management Review, 38 (1), 79-97.
Chowdhury, S. D. (2002). “Turnarounds: a atage theory perspective,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 19(3), 249-266.
Dunphy, D. & Stace, D. (1993). “The strategic management of corporate change,” Human Relations, 46(8), 905-918.
Feldman, E. R. (2021). “The corporate parenting advantage, revisited,” Strategy Management Journal, 42, 114-143.
Galpin, T. (2019). “Strategy beyond the business unit level: corporate parenting in focus,” Journal of Business Strategy, 40 (3), 43-51.
Georgalis, J., Samaratunge, R., Kimberley, N. & Lu, Y. (2015). “Change process characteristics and resistance to organizational change: the role of employee perception of justice.” Australian Journal of Management, 40, 89-113.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate Level Strategy: Creating Value in The Multibusiness Company, New York: Wiley.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1995). “Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage,” Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 120-132.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1995). “The value of parent company,” California Management Review, 38(1), 79-97.
Gotteiner, S., Mas-Machuca, M. & Marimon, F. (2019). “Fighting organizational decline: a risk-based approach to organizational anti-aging,” Management Research Review, 42(11), 1259-1277.
Herri, Johan, A. P., Handika, R. F. & Yulihasri (2017). “CEOs characteristics and the successful of turnaround strategy: evidences from Indonesia,” Academy of
Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 69-80.
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regner, P. (2017).
Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases, 11th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A. & Jick, T. D. (1992). The Challenge of Oganization Change. New York: The Free Press.
Kierulff, H. & Petersen, H. (2009). “Finance is everything: advice from turnaround managers,” Journal of Business Strategy, 30(6), 44-51.
Kamel, Y. M. (2005). A Comparative Study of The Impact of Turnaround Strategies and Leadership Factors on Successful Corporate Turnarounds, Chicago, IL: Benedictine University Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kruehler, M. & Pidun, U. (2011). “Parenting approaches in corporate strategy: An exploratory study on the impact of portfolio structure and culture,” Schmalenbach Business Review, 3, 69-91.
Kruehler, M., Pidun, U. & Rubner, H. (2012). “How to assess the corporate parenting strategy? A conceptual answer,” Journal of Business Strategy, 33(4), 4-17.
Laucer, T. (2021). Change Management. Fundamentals and Success Factors. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Gmbh.
Luecke, R. (2003). Managing Change and Transition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Luo, B., Wnag, Q., Lu, L. & Liang, L. (2015). “How to win the attention of top executives: The interaction of an issue’s characteristics and environmental threats,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 970-992.
Metz, M. (2021). “Overview of change in organizations. Resistance to change. a literature review,” Oviuius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 11(1),
611-620.
Moran, J. W. & Brightman, B. K. (2001). “Leading organizational change,” Career Development International, 6(2), 111-118.
Murphy, Gregory B. & Tocher, Neil (2011). “Corporate parents, initial legitimacy, and resource acquisition in small and medium Firms: an empirical examination,” New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14 (1), 23-34.
Nyagiloh, K. A. & Kilika J. M. (2020). “Theoretical review of turnaround strategy and its organization outcomes,” International Business Research, 13(2), 13-34.
Ocasio, W. (1997). “Towards an attention-based of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(Summer Special Issue), 187-206.
Panicker, S. & Manimala, M. J. (2015). “Successful turnarounds: the role of appropriate entrepreneurial strategies,” Journal of Strategy and Management,
8(1), 21-40.
Pearce, J. A. & Robbins, K. (1993). “Toward improved theory and research on business turnaround,” Journal of Management, 19(3), 613-636.
Oakland, J. S. & Tanner, S. (2007), “Successful change management,” Total Quality Management, 18(1-2), 1-19.
Prasad, V. (2006), “Role of HR in corporate turnaround,” HRM Review, 7(1), 11-29.
Ramanujam, V. & Varadarajan, P. (1989). “Research on corporate diversification: a synthesis,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, 523-551.
Reinganum, M. R. (1985). “The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 46-60.
Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., Martocchio, J. J. & Long, L. K. (2018). Management.
14th edition, London, UK: Pearson Education.
Salloum, Z. Z. (2019). Examining Under-Distress Firms Performance and Origin of Successor CEO: Quantitative Study, San Diego, CA: Northcentral University
Press.
Schepker, D. J., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Thatcher, S. M. B. & Campion, M. C. (2017).
“CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: a meta-analysis,” The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 701-720.
Schepker, D. J., Nyberg, A. J., Ulrich, M. D. & Wright, P. M. (2018). “Planning for future leadership: Procedural rationality, formalized succession processes, and CEO
influence in CEO succession planning,” Academy of Management Journal,
61(2), 523-552.
Schweizer, L. & Nienhaus, A. (2017). “Corporate distress and turnaround : integrating the literature and directing future research,” Business Research, 10(1), 3-47.
Senior, B. (2002). Organisational Change, 2nd ed. London: Prentice Hall.
Sundus, T.K., Sarah, S.R. & Shaju, G. (2017). “Resistance to change in organizations: a case of General Motors amd Nokia,” International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 7(1), 16-25.
Todnem, R. (2005), “Organisational change management: a critical review,” Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369-380.
Trahms, C., Ndofor, H. & Sirmon, D. (2013). “Organizational decline and turnround: a review and agenda for future research.” Journal of Management, 39(5), 1277-1307.
Wen, L. (2004). CEO Succession and Financial Performance in Troubled Firms, Cabondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Weng, D. H. & Cheng, H. L. (2021). “Does fairness narrow the gap? Effect of procedural justice on MNE attention disparity.” Global Strategy Journal, 1-29.
Weitzel, W. & Jonsson, E. (1989). “Decline in organizations: a literature integration and extension.” Administive Science Quterly, 34(1), 91-109.
Wood, J. & Vilkinas, T. (2005). “Characteristics associated with success: CEOs’ perspectives,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(3/4), 186-196.
Yan, A. & Gray, B. (1994). “Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: a comparative case study,” Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478-1517.
Yu, Y., Liu, Y. & Bai, T. (2019). “Does attention from headquarters influence subsidiary behavior? A social psychology perspective,” Long Range Planning, 52(4), 101877.
Zhou, Y. M. (2011). “Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices,” Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 624-639.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200456en_US