學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 家族企業傳承個案探討— 以接班人計劃及股權傳承為例
The Case Study of Family Business Succession-The Application of Succession Planning and Share Transfer Mechanism
作者 林姝孟
Lin, Shu-Meng
貢獻者 盧聯生
林姝孟
Lin, Shu-Meng
關鍵詞 家族企業
接班人計劃
股權傳承
Family business
Succession planning
Share transfer
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Jul-2022 16:05:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 在台灣,家族企業對整體經濟有著重要的貢獻,創造了許多就業機會。歷經了十大建設及經濟起飛,白手起家的企業創辦人面臨接班以及家業傳承的議題,不難發現有許多家族企業在創辦人逝世後,出現手足相爭遺產及經營權的狀況發生。如何找到合適的企業接班人並培養關鍵領袖,是很多企業面臨到的棘手問題。
     
     本研究剖析台灣家族企業傳承現狀,透過台塑集團以及大同集團作為個案研討之對象,針對接班人之養成與股權架構安排做討論。從台塑集團個案中可以發現,整個家族傳承的計畫非常完整。除了藉由信託以及財團法人基金會集中管理股權外,外部專業經理人引進亦奠定「企業永續經營永不分家」基石。
     
     就大同集團個案而言,家族企業接班的過程充滿動盪。林挺生親力親為對自己一手開創的事業不願放手,逝世後大房與二房的子女相互爭奪經營權。不適任的接班人選導致不佳經營績效,再加上家族持股過低,最終市場派人馬在董監改選中獲勝,大同經營權變天。建議家族企業引進專業經理人使所有權及經營權分權共治、以閉鎖性股份有限公司管理股權,企業才能長治久安。
In Taiwan, family businesses make a significant contribution to the overall economy and create many job opportunities. After ten major construction projects and economic growth, many corporate founders are facing the issue of family business succession. It is not difficult to find that there is a situation of siblings fighting for management control after the death of the founder. Therefore, how to select and cultivate family business successor becomes a thorny issue for family businesses.
     
     This study applies the case study approach to analyze the current situations of family business succession in Taiwan through Formosa Plastics Group and TATUNG Group. From the case of Formosa Plastics Group, it can be found that the process of family business succession is very complete. In addition to the centralized management of equity through trusts and foundations, the introduction of external professional managers has also laid the foundation of sustainability in business.
     
     As for TATUNG Group, the founder did not give full authorization. After his death, the children with different wives competed with each other for management control. The unsuitable successor led to poor business performance, coupled with the low shareholding, and finally a potential takeover won the election of new board of directors and supervisors. Members of the Lin family lost their control in TATUNG Group. Based on the finding of the study, it is recommended that family businesses introduce professional managers to separate ownership and management and establish closely-held corporations, so that enterprises can purse sustainability development.
參考文獻 EMBA雜誌,2019,二代接班問題有那些?如何讓家族企業順利接班,第392期,4月。
     大同集團官方網站,關於大同,網址:https://www.tatung.com/Content/about-about.asp。
     王振寰與陳琮淵,2011,家族企業還重要嗎,台北:巨流出版社。
     台塑企業,2021,台塑企業簡介,台北:台塑。
     台塑企業官方網站,企業簡介,網址:https://www.fpg.com.tw/tw。
     吳沛珊,1998,家族企業中企業主對專業經理人的信任評估及行為導向—從家族企業組織結構特徵的觀點探討,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
     周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏,1994,家族持股、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究,中國財務學刊,第4卷第1期:115-139。
     金昌民,2004,公司治理在家族企業之應用宏傳電子股份有限公司實例探討,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
     姚惠珍,2015,繼承者們-台塑接班十年秘辛,台北:時報文化出版社。
     許士軍與陳光中,1989,台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係,行政院國家科學會專題研究。
     連玲玲,1993,中國家族企業之研究--以上海永安公司為例, 1918-1949,私立東海大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
     陳妍君,2005,垂直整合策略之績效研究—以台塑集團為例,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
     陳定國,1986,有效經營,台北:天下出版社。
     陳泰和,2001,台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素之探討-以交易成本、信賴機制、網路關係之觀點探討,國立台灣大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文。
     陳榮貴,1984,世界十五大經濟學,台北:志文出版社。
     黃光國,1984,談家族企業的組織型態,中國論壇第13卷第7期:21-22。
     葉銀華,1998,家族控股、董事會組成與經營績效—台灣家族企業管治機制之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
     資誠聯合會計師事務所,2020,台灣家族企業傳承白皮書,台北:資誠聯合會計師事務所。
     樊景立與鄭伯壎,2000,華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析,本土心理學研究,第13期:127-180。
     潘鳳文,2005,台灣家族企業接班傳承之個案研究,私立輔仁大學金融研究所在職專班學位論文。
     羅富珍,2005,家族企業經營發展之關鍵成功因素分析—以比安逹國際集團為例,私立育達商業技術學院企業管理研究所碩士論文。
     嚴奇峰,1994,台灣家族企業組織成長問題之研究-社會文化基礎與自發性規模抑制現象,企業經營策略與經營績效學術研討會論文,中山大學。
     顧娜娜,2007,家族企業接班人培訓計劃之個案探討,國立高雄大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
     Carlock, R.S. and J. L. Ward. 2001. Strategic planning for the family business: parallel planning to unite the family and business. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
     Church, R. A. 1969. Kenricks in hardware: A family business, 1791-1966. Newton Abbott: David and Charles.
     Davis, P. 1983. Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics 12(1): 47-56.
     Donckels, R. and E. Frohlich. 1991. Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review 4(2): 149-160.
     Donnelley, R. G. 1964. The family business. Harvard Business Review 42(4): 93-105.
     Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
     Handler, W. C. 1989. Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review 2(3): 257-276.
     Kachaner, N., G. Stalk, Jr., and A. Bloch. 2012. What you can learn from family business. Harvard Business Review (November).
     Lansberg, I. S. 1988. The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review 1(2): 119-143.
     Ram, M. and T. Jones. 2002. Exploring the connection: Ethnic minority businesses and the family enterprise, in D. E. Fletcher(ed.) Understanding the small family business, 157-67. London: Routledge.
     Rothwell, W. J. 2005. Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within (3rd Ed.). New York: AMACOM.
     Shen, W. and A. Cannela. 2003. Will succession planning increase shareholders’ wealth? Strategic Management Journal 24(2): 191–198.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計學系
109353107
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353107
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 盧聯生zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林姝孟zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Shu-Mengen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林姝孟zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Shu-Mengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Jul-2022 16:05:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Jul-2022 16:05:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jul-2022 16:05:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109353107en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140581-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109353107zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在台灣,家族企業對整體經濟有著重要的貢獻,創造了許多就業機會。歷經了十大建設及經濟起飛,白手起家的企業創辦人面臨接班以及家業傳承的議題,不難發現有許多家族企業在創辦人逝世後,出現手足相爭遺產及經營權的狀況發生。如何找到合適的企業接班人並培養關鍵領袖,是很多企業面臨到的棘手問題。
     
     本研究剖析台灣家族企業傳承現狀,透過台塑集團以及大同集團作為個案研討之對象,針對接班人之養成與股權架構安排做討論。從台塑集團個案中可以發現,整個家族傳承的計畫非常完整。除了藉由信託以及財團法人基金會集中管理股權外,外部專業經理人引進亦奠定「企業永續經營永不分家」基石。
     
     就大同集團個案而言,家族企業接班的過程充滿動盪。林挺生親力親為對自己一手開創的事業不願放手,逝世後大房與二房的子女相互爭奪經營權。不適任的接班人選導致不佳經營績效,再加上家族持股過低,最終市場派人馬在董監改選中獲勝,大同經營權變天。建議家族企業引進專業經理人使所有權及經營權分權共治、以閉鎖性股份有限公司管理股權,企業才能長治久安。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In Taiwan, family businesses make a significant contribution to the overall economy and create many job opportunities. After ten major construction projects and economic growth, many corporate founders are facing the issue of family business succession. It is not difficult to find that there is a situation of siblings fighting for management control after the death of the founder. Therefore, how to select and cultivate family business successor becomes a thorny issue for family businesses.
     
     This study applies the case study approach to analyze the current situations of family business succession in Taiwan through Formosa Plastics Group and TATUNG Group. From the case of Formosa Plastics Group, it can be found that the process of family business succession is very complete. In addition to the centralized management of equity through trusts and foundations, the introduction of external professional managers has also laid the foundation of sustainability in business.
     
     As for TATUNG Group, the founder did not give full authorization. After his death, the children with different wives competed with each other for management control. The unsuitable successor led to poor business performance, coupled with the low shareholding, and finally a potential takeover won the election of new board of directors and supervisors. Members of the Lin family lost their control in TATUNG Group. Based on the finding of the study, it is recommended that family businesses introduce professional managers to separate ownership and management and establish closely-held corporations, so that enterprises can purse sustainability development.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究背景與動機 1
     第二節 研究目的 5
     第三節 研究流程 5
     第四節 研究方法 6
     第二章 文獻回顧 7
     第一節 家族企業定義 7
     第二節 家族企業的特徵與優缺點 9
     第三節 家族企業傳承問題 12
     第三章 常見之家族傳承工具 15
     第一節 接班人計劃 15
     第二節 股權傳承規劃工具介紹 22
     第四章 家族傳承個案研究 30
     第一節 個案I—台塑集團家族傳承計畫 30
     第二節 個案Ⅱ—大同集團家族傳承計畫 47
     第五章 結論與建議 59
     第一節 結論 59
     第二節 建議 59
     參考文獻 61
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109353107en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家族企業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 接班人計劃zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 股權傳承zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Family businessen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Succession planningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Share transferen_US
dc.title (題名) 家族企業傳承個案探討— 以接班人計劃及股權傳承為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Case Study of Family Business Succession-The Application of Succession Planning and Share Transfer Mechanismen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) EMBA雜誌,2019,二代接班問題有那些?如何讓家族企業順利接班,第392期,4月。
     大同集團官方網站,關於大同,網址:https://www.tatung.com/Content/about-about.asp。
     王振寰與陳琮淵,2011,家族企業還重要嗎,台北:巨流出版社。
     台塑企業,2021,台塑企業簡介,台北:台塑。
     台塑企業官方網站,企業簡介,網址:https://www.fpg.com.tw/tw。
     吳沛珊,1998,家族企業中企業主對專業經理人的信任評估及行為導向—從家族企業組織結構特徵的觀點探討,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
     周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏,1994,家族持股、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究,中國財務學刊,第4卷第1期:115-139。
     金昌民,2004,公司治理在家族企業之應用宏傳電子股份有限公司實例探討,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
     姚惠珍,2015,繼承者們-台塑接班十年秘辛,台北:時報文化出版社。
     許士軍與陳光中,1989,台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係,行政院國家科學會專題研究。
     連玲玲,1993,中國家族企業之研究--以上海永安公司為例, 1918-1949,私立東海大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
     陳妍君,2005,垂直整合策略之績效研究—以台塑集團為例,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
     陳定國,1986,有效經營,台北:天下出版社。
     陳泰和,2001,台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素之探討-以交易成本、信賴機制、網路關係之觀點探討,國立台灣大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文。
     陳榮貴,1984,世界十五大經濟學,台北:志文出版社。
     黃光國,1984,談家族企業的組織型態,中國論壇第13卷第7期:21-22。
     葉銀華,1998,家族控股、董事會組成與經營績效—台灣家族企業管治機制之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
     資誠聯合會計師事務所,2020,台灣家族企業傳承白皮書,台北:資誠聯合會計師事務所。
     樊景立與鄭伯壎,2000,華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析,本土心理學研究,第13期:127-180。
     潘鳳文,2005,台灣家族企業接班傳承之個案研究,私立輔仁大學金融研究所在職專班學位論文。
     羅富珍,2005,家族企業經營發展之關鍵成功因素分析—以比安逹國際集團為例,私立育達商業技術學院企業管理研究所碩士論文。
     嚴奇峰,1994,台灣家族企業組織成長問題之研究-社會文化基礎與自發性規模抑制現象,企業經營策略與經營績效學術研討會論文,中山大學。
     顧娜娜,2007,家族企業接班人培訓計劃之個案探討,國立高雄大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
     Carlock, R.S. and J. L. Ward. 2001. Strategic planning for the family business: parallel planning to unite the family and business. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
     Church, R. A. 1969. Kenricks in hardware: A family business, 1791-1966. Newton Abbott: David and Charles.
     Davis, P. 1983. Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics 12(1): 47-56.
     Donckels, R. and E. Frohlich. 1991. Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review 4(2): 149-160.
     Donnelley, R. G. 1964. The family business. Harvard Business Review 42(4): 93-105.
     Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
     Handler, W. C. 1989. Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review 2(3): 257-276.
     Kachaner, N., G. Stalk, Jr., and A. Bloch. 2012. What you can learn from family business. Harvard Business Review (November).
     Lansberg, I. S. 1988. The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review 1(2): 119-143.
     Ram, M. and T. Jones. 2002. Exploring the connection: Ethnic minority businesses and the family enterprise, in D. E. Fletcher(ed.) Understanding the small family business, 157-67. London: Routledge.
     Rothwell, W. J. 2005. Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within (3rd Ed.). New York: AMACOM.
     Shen, W. and A. Cannela. 2003. Will succession planning increase shareholders’ wealth? Strategic Management Journal 24(2): 191–198.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200610en_US