學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 SASB準則下ESG重大性議題與公司風險之關係
An Analysis of SASB ESG Materiality and Firm Risks作者 游珮姿
Yu, Pei-Tzu貢獻者 陳鴻毅
Chen, Hong-Yi
游珮姿
Yu, Pei-Tzu關鍵詞 ESG
SASB
重大性議題
公司風險
特有風險
股價崩跌風險
財務限制
ESG
SASB
Materiality
Firm risk
Idiosyncratic risk
Stock price crash risk
Financial constraint日期 2022 上傳時間 1-Jul-2022 16:07:33 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究旨在探討企業於環境、社會及公司治理(ESG)之表現與公司風險之關係。本研究以兩指標來衡量企業ESG表現,第一為取自Bloomberg資料庫之ESG揭露分數,第二為使用Bloomberg原始ESG項目資料,並依據永續會計準則委員會(SASB)所辨識出之ESG重大性議題重新計算而成之SASB分數;公司風險則以公司特有風險、股價崩跌風險以及財務限制指數來衡量。實證結果發現以兩種分數衡量之ESG表現皆與公司特有風險及財務限制指數呈顯著負相關。若將樣本進一步以風險高低程度分組,各組樣本之ESG表現與公司特有風險、財務限制指數也存在顯著的負相關。此外,在金融危機期間,ESG揭露分數較高的公司有較低的特有風險,而SASB分數較高的公司則有較低的特有風險及股價崩跌風險。本研究之實證結果建議公司應優先專注於自身產業內的重大性議題,方能以有效率且節省成本的方式減少公司特有風險及財務限制,亦能於金融危機期間降低股價崩盤的可能性。
This study investigates the association between ESG performance and firm risks. To evaluate ESG performance of a firm, this study applies ESG disclosure score from Bloomberg database and the score constructed based on material ESG issues identified by Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). In terms of firm risks, this study includes idiosyncratic risk, stock price crash risk, and financial constraints. Empirical results show that ESG performance of a firm, in terms of ESG disclosure score and SASB Score, is significantly and negatively related to idiosyncratic risk and financial constraints of the firm. In addition, the negative association between ESG performance and firm risks exists in both high-risk firms and low-risk firms. Moreover, during crisis period, the better ESG performance can deliver lower idiosyncratic risk, while only firms engaging in material ESG issues can have lower stock price crash risk. Overall, this study confirms the importance of SASB Score in determining firm risks. This study suggests that firms can reduce both idiosyncratic risk and financial constraints in a more efficient and cost-saving way if they put more efforts on their corresponding material ESG issues.參考文獻 Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 1-19.Benlemlih, M., Amama, S., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 613-626.Ben-Nasra, H., & Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 700-725.Boffo, R., & Patalan, R. (2020). ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges. OECD Paris. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-Challenges.pdfBouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2018). Social performance and firm risk: Impact of the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 643-669.Chan, C. Y., Chou, D. W., & Lo, H. C. (2017). Do financial constraints matter when firms engage in CSR? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 39, 241-259.Chang, C. H., Chen, S. S., Chen, Y. S., & Peng, S. C. (2019). Commitment to build trust by socially responsible firms: Evidence from cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 364-387.Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management science, 60(9), 2223-2247.Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.Governance & Accountability Institute. (2020). Flash report S&P 500: A study on the sustainability reporting practices of S&P 500 index companies. Retrieved from https://www.ga-institute.com/flash-report.htmlHadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909-1940.Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers` personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33-44.Henriksson, R., Livnat, J., Pfeifer, P., & Stumpp, M. (2019). Integrating ESG in portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 67-81.Hoepner, A. G., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. (2020). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. European Corporate Governance Institute - Finance Working Paper No. 671/2020.Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate goodness (No. w18476). National Bureau of Economic Research.Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169-215.Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13.Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213-237.Madison, N., & Schiehll, E. (2021). The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability, 13(7), 3652.Schiehll, E., & Kolahgar, S. (2021). Financial materiality in the informativeness of sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 840-855.Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531-559. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理學系
109357018資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109357018 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳鴻毅 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Hong-Yi en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 游珮姿 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yu, Pei-Tzu en_US dc.creator (作者) 游珮姿 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yu, Pei-Tzu en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Jul-2022 16:07:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Jul-2022 16:07:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jul-2022 16:07:33 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109357018 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140590 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財務管理學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109357018 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討企業於環境、社會及公司治理(ESG)之表現與公司風險之關係。本研究以兩指標來衡量企業ESG表現,第一為取自Bloomberg資料庫之ESG揭露分數,第二為使用Bloomberg原始ESG項目資料,並依據永續會計準則委員會(SASB)所辨識出之ESG重大性議題重新計算而成之SASB分數;公司風險則以公司特有風險、股價崩跌風險以及財務限制指數來衡量。實證結果發現以兩種分數衡量之ESG表現皆與公司特有風險及財務限制指數呈顯著負相關。若將樣本進一步以風險高低程度分組,各組樣本之ESG表現與公司特有風險、財務限制指數也存在顯著的負相關。此外,在金融危機期間,ESG揭露分數較高的公司有較低的特有風險,而SASB分數較高的公司則有較低的特有風險及股價崩跌風險。本研究之實證結果建議公司應優先專注於自身產業內的重大性議題,方能以有效率且節省成本的方式減少公司特有風險及財務限制,亦能於金融危機期間降低股價崩盤的可能性。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study investigates the association between ESG performance and firm risks. To evaluate ESG performance of a firm, this study applies ESG disclosure score from Bloomberg database and the score constructed based on material ESG issues identified by Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). In terms of firm risks, this study includes idiosyncratic risk, stock price crash risk, and financial constraints. Empirical results show that ESG performance of a firm, in terms of ESG disclosure score and SASB Score, is significantly and negatively related to idiosyncratic risk and financial constraints of the firm. In addition, the negative association between ESG performance and firm risks exists in both high-risk firms and low-risk firms. Moreover, during crisis period, the better ESG performance can deliver lower idiosyncratic risk, while only firms engaging in material ESG issues can have lower stock price crash risk. Overall, this study confirms the importance of SASB Score in determining firm risks. This study suggests that firms can reduce both idiosyncratic risk and financial constraints in a more efficient and cost-saving way if they put more efforts on their corresponding material ESG issues. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents List of Tables v1. Introduction 12. Literature Review and Research Questions 52.1 ESG and Financial Risk 52.2 ESG and Stock Price Crash Risk 62.3 ESG and Financial Constraints 62.4 SASB Related Research 72.5 Research Questions 83. Data and Methodology 93.1 Sample 93.2 Variables 93.3 Models 154. Empirical Results 184.1 Descriptive Statistics 184.2 The Effect of Bloomberg ESG Disclosure Score on Firm Risks 194.3 The Effect of SASB Score on Firm Risks 204.4 The Incremental Effect of SASB Score on Firm Risks 214.5 The Relation between ESG Performance and Firm Risks among Different Risk Groups 224.6 The Relation between ESG Performance and Firm Risks under Different Economic Conditions 245. Conclusion 265.1 Conclusion and Implications 265.2 Limitations and Future Research 28References 29 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1436930 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109357018 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) ESG zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) SASB zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 重大性議題 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司風險 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 特有風險 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 股價崩跌風險 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財務限制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) ESG en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) SASB en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Materiality en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Firm risk en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Idiosyncratic risk en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Stock price crash risk en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Financial constraint en_US dc.title (題名) SASB準則下ESG重大性議題與公司風險之關係 zh_TW dc.title (題名) An Analysis of SASB ESG Materiality and Firm Risks en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 1-19.Benlemlih, M., Amama, S., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 613-626.Ben-Nasra, H., & Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 700-725.Boffo, R., & Patalan, R. (2020). ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges. OECD Paris. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-Challenges.pdfBouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2018). Social performance and firm risk: Impact of the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 643-669.Chan, C. Y., Chou, D. W., & Lo, H. C. (2017). Do financial constraints matter when firms engage in CSR? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 39, 241-259.Chang, C. H., Chen, S. S., Chen, Y. S., & Peng, S. C. (2019). Commitment to build trust by socially responsible firms: Evidence from cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 364-387.Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management science, 60(9), 2223-2247.Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.Governance & Accountability Institute. (2020). Flash report S&P 500: A study on the sustainability reporting practices of S&P 500 index companies. Retrieved from https://www.ga-institute.com/flash-report.htmlHadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909-1940.Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers` personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33-44.Henriksson, R., Livnat, J., Pfeifer, P., & Stumpp, M. (2019). Integrating ESG in portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 67-81.Hoepner, A. G., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. (2020). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. European Corporate Governance Institute - Finance Working Paper No. 671/2020.Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate goodness (No. w18476). National Bureau of Economic Research.Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169-215.Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13.Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213-237.Madison, N., & Schiehll, E. (2021). The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability, 13(7), 3652.Schiehll, E., & Kolahgar, S. (2021). Financial materiality in the informativeness of sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 840-855.Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531-559. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200597 en_US