學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 防疫旅館對鄰近房價的影響
The Impacts of Quarantine Hotels on Housing Prices作者 薛鈺勳
Xue, Yu-Xun貢獻者 胡偉民<br>黃柏鈞
薛鈺勳
Xue, Yu-Xun關鍵詞 特徵價格模型
Box-cox
防疫旅館
半嫌惡設施
鄰避設施
Hedonic price
Box-Cox
Quarantine Hotels
Semi-Obnoxious Facility
NIMBY日期 2022 上傳時間 1-Aug-2022 18:32:01 (UTC+8) 摘要 人們購屋時，為保值增值，會考量影響房價多項因素，包含外部特徵的周遭就業就學機會、區位獨特性、生活機能良窳、交通便捷度、不同價位住宅商品之區隔性、總體經濟、政策面向；同時也會將房屋本身特質如坪數、建材、樓層等納入決策因素，外部與內部特徵皆對房價的變動皆有顯著的影響。影響外部特徵的場所又可區分為迎毗設施與鄰避設施，過去許多文獻探討正向與負向設施對於房屋價格影響程度。然而，新冠疫情爆發，持續延燒至今，原本帶來絡繹人潮的重要商圈逐漸沒落，周邊光觀旅宿紛紛轉型為防疫旅館，因應防疫政策並支撐經濟蕭條時期。疫情的衝擊使許多設施由迎毗設施變成鄰避設施，居民避免居住於人流頻繁地區周圍，以降低確診風險。本研究運用防疫旅館資料、實價登錄交易資料及內政部地標圖資，透過豐富資料來評估住宅交易市場的影響，考慮房屋本身特徵外也同時加入除了旅館業與其他迎毗及鄰避設施。利用特徵價格模型進行六種迴歸分析，實證結果顯示，防疫旅館具有半嫌避設施的特性。觀光旅館多位於生活機能完善地區，在轉型為防疫旅館後則成為疫情擴散設施，使得不同模型估計下，房價與距離關係呈現正負皆有的情形。
People usually want to buy a property that can keep its value over time.There are some factors that will take into consideration, including the property`s internal attributes like floors, building materials, and external surroundings location, life function, amenities.The facilities can be categorized into positive and negative impacts on real estate. The YIMBY facilities provide benefits to the neighbor, and the NIMBY are damagingfacilities that might be detrimental to health and security. However, in the wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, many businesses, and shopping districts are vulnerable toinfluence severely. Some hotels transform to quarantine hotels to help with medical resources and support their financial crunch. There were also many YIMBY facilitiesconverted to NIMBY since people avoid residing nearby areas with dense populations.The study adopts the quarantine hotel data, actual transaction price registration data, and landmark location data to evaluate the impact on the real estate transactionmarket. Besides, The regressions analysis is conducted in the hedonic price model. The empirical results concluded as follows: The quarantine hotels might categorize as Semi-Obnoxious Facilities. Tourist hotels were located in an area that provided great amenities and surrounding pivot transport. However, the hotels become the dispersal center of the virus after they change to the quarantine hotels. Therefore, the relationship between distances and house prices is both positive and negative under six regression models.參考文獻 中文部分王恭棋(2007). Box-Cox 轉換半對數特徵房價模型實證研究(碩士論文)，國立中央大學大學。張莉君(2016). 迎毗設施及鄰避設施對房屋價格影響之研究-以新北市板橋區及新莊區為例(碩士論文)，國立中央大學。林素菁(2004). 台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計，住宅學報，13(1)。李永展(1997). 鄰避症候群之解析，都市與計劃，24(1)，69 - 79。廖仲仁(1994). 機場噪音對住宅價格之影響-以臺北松山機場附近住宅為例(碩士論文)，台灣大學。楊宗憲與蘇倖慧(2011). 迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究，住宅學報，20(2)。楊重信、王安民(2008). 基隆河流域洪災防治效益之評估：特徵價格法之應用，都市與計劃，35(1)，29-47。楊國柱、顏愛靜(2004). 殯葬設施設置鄰避衝突之分析：以交易成本理論為觀點，中國行政評論，14(1)。陳冠儒(2021). 民眾對社會住宅弱勢保障比率態度之影響因素分析，住宅學報。林忠樑與林佳慧(2014). 學校特徵與空間距離對周邊房價之影響分析-以台北市為例，台灣大學。林楨家與張佑川(2006). 台北捷運地下街店舖租金分析-特徵價格法之應用，建築與規劃學報，30(1)，1-26。林郁欽、王秋原(2005). 從環境識覺觀點分析加油站設置的鄰避效果-台北都會區的個案研究，華岡地理學報，18，3-1-3-32。52林茂成(2001). 鄰避型設施區位選擇與處理模式之探討－以都會區捷運系統為例(上)，現代營建，22(5)，67-76。李文傑、甯方璽、黃雅祺(2014). 集合式住宅房價泡沫形成之研究-以台中市為例，建築與規劃學報，15(2)(3)，155-174。李春長、童作君(2010). 住宅特徵價格模型之多層次分析，經濟論文叢刊，38(2)。李泳龍、黃宗誠、戴政安、李善將(2009). 醫學中心對鄰近住宅環境影響之研究，建築與規劃學報，10(1)，75-94。李杰憲、傅祖壇(2008). 嚴重型心臟血管疾病之改善效益衡量－特徵價格法之應用，經濟論文叢刊，36(1)。胡偉民(2021). 綠建築與房屋交易價格-特徵價格法與離散選擇模型的應用，國立政治大學。胡志平(2005). 新竹科學園區設置之環境風險認知分析與價值評估，建築與規劃學報，6(1)。任翔澤(2021). 新北市綠住宅標章與價格分析(碩士論文)，國立政治學。賴碧瑩 (2016). 高雄市公園綠地空間對房價影響之研究(碩士論文)，國立屏東大學。彭克仲、陳姿萍(2004). 台灣即飲咖啡特徵價格之研究，農業經濟半年刊，(75)。朱泰宇(2017). 設施對住宅特徵價格之動態影響函數研究(碩士論文)，國立中央大學大學。黃怡潔、江穎慧、張金鶚 (2017). 臺北市公共住宅對周圍住宅價格之影響，44(3)，277-302。洪得洋、林祖嘉(1999). 台北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究，住宅學報，47-67。梁世武、李均揚(2014). 從鄰避效應與認知失調解析台灣民眾的核電風險認知與態度，台灣衛誌 33(4)，428-444。邱敬斌、賴世剛(2007). 鄰避性設施設置協商策略比較之實驗研究，臺灣土地研究，10(1)。闕雅文、鄧秋玲、鄧雁文(2013). 台灣、日本溫泉旅館特徵屬性與價格分析，台灣國際研究季刊， 9(3)，175-98。廖咸興、張芳玲(1997). 不動產評價模式特徵價格法與逼近調整法之比較，住宅學報，(5)。陳信字、楊育誠(2019). 優質酒品認證標誌之特徵價格研究－以高粱酒為例，應用經濟論叢，106。英文部分Andrew Adewale Alola, Gizem Uzuner (2021). Testing the asymmetric causal nexus of housing-oil prices and pandemic uncertainty in four major economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 60550–60556.Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox(1964), An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 211-243.Bingbing Wang. (2021). How Does COVID-19 Affect House Prices? A Cross-City Analysis.Chau, K. W., & Chin, T. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 27(2), 145-165.Chang-Hee Christine Baea, Myung-Jin Junb, Hyeon Park. (2003). The Impact of Seoul’s Subway Line 5 on Residential Property Values. Transport Policy, 10, 85–94.David C. Ling, Chongyu Wang, Tingyu Zhou. (2020). A First Look at the Impact of COVID-19 on Commercial Real Estate Prices: Asset-Level Evidence.Graves, P., Murdoch, J.C., Thayer, M.A., and Waldman, D.(1988). The Robustness of Hedonic Price Estimation Urban Air Quality”, Land Economics, 64(3), 220-233.Greg Brown, Hunter Glanz.(2018). Identifying potential NIMBY and YIMBY effects in general land use planning and zoning. Applied Geography.Groothuis, P.A. and G. Miller. (1994). Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities : The Influence of NIMBY Beliefs. American Journal of Economics and Socialogy.Haizhen Wen, Shuyuan Li, Eddie C.M. Hui, Yue Xiao, Hongjie Liu. (2022).Externality impacts of “Not in My Backyard” facilities on property values : Evidence from the Hangzhou waste sorting and reduction complex projects. HabitatInternational, 125.Haizhen Wen, Zaiyuan Gui, Chuanhao Tian, Yue Xiao and Li Fang. (2018). Subway Opening, Traffic Accessibility, and Housing Prices: A Quantile Hedonic Analysis in Hangzhou, China.Harun Tanrivermis. (2022). Possible impacts of COVID-19 outbreak on real estate sector and possible changes to adopt: A situation analysis and general assessmenton Turkish perspective. Journal of Urban Management, 9, 263-269.Jim. C.Y., Wendy Y. Chen. (2006). Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning,78, 422–434.Jim. C.Y, Wendy Y. Chen. (2007). Consumption preferences and environmental externalities : A hedonic analysis of the housing market in Guangzhou.Geoforum, 38, 414–431.Ka Shing Cheung, Chung Yim Yiu and Chuyi Xiong. (2021). A Price Gradient Analysis from the COVID-19 Epicentre in China.Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Tzoulas, T., & Snabb, K. (2013). Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 30–46.Kolbe, J. & Wustemann, H. (2015). Estimating the Value of urban green space- A hedonicpricing analysis of the housing market in Cologne, Germany, Economic Risk Berlin, 1-19.Lin, C.C.(1993) The Relationship between Rents and Prices of Owner-Occupied Housing in Taiwan”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 6, 25-54.Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy,74(2), 132-157Lake, R.W. (1993).Rethinking NIMBY. American Planning Association Journal.Machteld Joly & Simon De Jaeger. (2021). Not in my backyard: A hedonic approach to the construction timeline of wind turbines in Flanders, Belgium.Minhua Yang & Junni Zhou. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the housing market: evidence from the Yangtze river delta region in China.Maggie R. Hu, Adrian D. Lee, Dihan Zou. (2021). COVID-19 and Housing Prices: Australian Evidence with Daily Hedonic Returns.Nicola, Maria, Zaid Alsafi, Catrin Sohrabi, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, Maliha Agha, and Riaz Agha. (2020).The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic : A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78, 185–93.Oded B., Qian W. (2008). Locating a Semi-Obnoxious Facility with Expropriation, Computer & Operations Research, 35(2), 392-403.Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.Xianhang Qian, Shanyun Qiu, Guangli Zhang. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on housing price : Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 43.Xinba Li, Chihwa Kao (2022). Spatial Analysis and Modeling of the Housing Value Changes in the U.S. during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Risk and Finanacial Management. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
109255026資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109255026 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 胡偉民<br>黃柏鈞 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 薛鈺勳 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Xue, Yu-Xun en_US dc.creator (作者) 薛鈺勳 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Xue, Yu-Xun en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Aug-2022 18:32:01 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Aug-2022 18:32:01 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Aug-2022 18:32:01 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109255026 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141267 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109255026 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 人們購屋時，為保值增值，會考量影響房價多項因素，包含外部特徵的周遭就業就學機會、區位獨特性、生活機能良窳、交通便捷度、不同價位住宅商品之區隔性、總體經濟、政策面向；同時也會將房屋本身特質如坪數、建材、樓層等納入決策因素，外部與內部特徵皆對房價的變動皆有顯著的影響。影響外部特徵的場所又可區分為迎毗設施與鄰避設施，過去許多文獻探討正向與負向設施對於房屋價格影響程度。然而，新冠疫情爆發，持續延燒至今，原本帶來絡繹人潮的重要商圈逐漸沒落，周邊光觀旅宿紛紛轉型為防疫旅館，因應防疫政策並支撐經濟蕭條時期。疫情的衝擊使許多設施由迎毗設施變成鄰避設施，居民避免居住於人流頻繁地區周圍，以降低確診風險。本研究運用防疫旅館資料、實價登錄交易資料及內政部地標圖資，透過豐富資料來評估住宅交易市場的影響，考慮房屋本身特徵外也同時加入除了旅館業與其他迎毗及鄰避設施。利用特徵價格模型進行六種迴歸分析，實證結果顯示，防疫旅館具有半嫌避設施的特性。觀光旅館多位於生活機能完善地區，在轉型為防疫旅館後則成為疫情擴散設施，使得不同模型估計下，房價與距離關係呈現正負皆有的情形。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) People usually want to buy a property that can keep its value over time.There are some factors that will take into consideration, including the property`s internal attributes like floors, building materials, and external surroundings location, life function, amenities.The facilities can be categorized into positive and negative impacts on real estate. The YIMBY facilities provide benefits to the neighbor, and the NIMBY are damagingfacilities that might be detrimental to health and security. However, in the wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, many businesses, and shopping districts are vulnerable toinfluence severely. Some hotels transform to quarantine hotels to help with medical resources and support their financial crunch. There were also many YIMBY facilitiesconverted to NIMBY since people avoid residing nearby areas with dense populations.The study adopts the quarantine hotel data, actual transaction price registration data, and landmark location data to evaluate the impact on the real estate transactionmarket. Besides, The regressions analysis is conducted in the hedonic price model. The empirical results concluded as follows: The quarantine hotels might categorize as Semi-Obnoxious Facilities. Tourist hotels were located in an area that provided great amenities and surrounding pivot transport. However, the hotels become the dispersal center of the virus after they change to the quarantine hotels. Therefore, the relationship between distances and house prices is both positive and negative under six regression models. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄摘要 vAbstract vi第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景 1第二節 研究動機 3第三節 研究流程 5第二章 文獻回顧 6第一節 新冠疫情與房價相關研究 6第二節 迎毗、鄰避、半嫌惡設施 8第三節 特徵價格相關研究 14第三章 研究方法 17第一節 研究目的與方法17第四章 資料處理與變數 22第一節 研究資料 22第二節 變數設定與敘述統計 25第五章 實證分析 33第六章 結論 48參考文獻 51附錄 57 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2465335 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109255026 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 特徵價格模型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Box-cox zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 防疫旅館 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 半嫌惡設施 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 鄰避設施 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hedonic price en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Box-Cox en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Quarantine Hotels en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Semi-Obnoxious Facility en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) NIMBY en_US dc.title (題名) 防疫旅館對鄰近房價的影響 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Impacts of Quarantine Hotels on Housing Prices en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分王恭棋(2007). Box-Cox 轉換半對數特徵房價模型實證研究(碩士論文)，國立中央大學大學。張莉君(2016). 迎毗設施及鄰避設施對房屋價格影響之研究-以新北市板橋區及新莊區為例(碩士論文)，國立中央大學。林素菁(2004). 台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計，住宅學報，13(1)。李永展(1997). 鄰避症候群之解析，都市與計劃，24(1)，69 - 79。廖仲仁(1994). 機場噪音對住宅價格之影響-以臺北松山機場附近住宅為例(碩士論文)，台灣大學。楊宗憲與蘇倖慧(2011). 迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究，住宅學報，20(2)。楊重信、王安民(2008). 基隆河流域洪災防治效益之評估：特徵價格法之應用，都市與計劃，35(1)，29-47。楊國柱、顏愛靜(2004). 殯葬設施設置鄰避衝突之分析：以交易成本理論為觀點，中國行政評論，14(1)。陳冠儒(2021). 民眾對社會住宅弱勢保障比率態度之影響因素分析，住宅學報。林忠樑與林佳慧(2014). 學校特徵與空間距離對周邊房價之影響分析-以台北市為例，台灣大學。林楨家與張佑川(2006). 台北捷運地下街店舖租金分析-特徵價格法之應用，建築與規劃學報，30(1)，1-26。林郁欽、王秋原(2005). 從環境識覺觀點分析加油站設置的鄰避效果-台北都會區的個案研究，華岡地理學報，18，3-1-3-32。52林茂成(2001). 鄰避型設施區位選擇與處理模式之探討－以都會區捷運系統為例(上)，現代營建，22(5)，67-76。李文傑、甯方璽、黃雅祺(2014). 集合式住宅房價泡沫形成之研究-以台中市為例，建築與規劃學報，15(2)(3)，155-174。李春長、童作君(2010). 住宅特徵價格模型之多層次分析，經濟論文叢刊，38(2)。李泳龍、黃宗誠、戴政安、李善將(2009). 醫學中心對鄰近住宅環境影響之研究，建築與規劃學報，10(1)，75-94。李杰憲、傅祖壇(2008). 嚴重型心臟血管疾病之改善效益衡量－特徵價格法之應用，經濟論文叢刊，36(1)。胡偉民(2021). 綠建築與房屋交易價格-特徵價格法與離散選擇模型的應用，國立政治大學。胡志平(2005). 新竹科學園區設置之環境風險認知分析與價值評估，建築與規劃學報，6(1)。任翔澤(2021). 新北市綠住宅標章與價格分析(碩士論文)，國立政治學。賴碧瑩 (2016). 高雄市公園綠地空間對房價影響之研究(碩士論文)，國立屏東大學。彭克仲、陳姿萍(2004). 台灣即飲咖啡特徵價格之研究，農業經濟半年刊，(75)。朱泰宇(2017). 設施對住宅特徵價格之動態影響函數研究(碩士論文)，國立中央大學大學。黃怡潔、江穎慧、張金鶚 (2017). 臺北市公共住宅對周圍住宅價格之影響，44(3)，277-302。洪得洋、林祖嘉(1999). 台北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究，住宅學報，47-67。梁世武、李均揚(2014). 從鄰避效應與認知失調解析台灣民眾的核電風險認知與態度，台灣衛誌 33(4)，428-444。邱敬斌、賴世剛(2007). 鄰避性設施設置協商策略比較之實驗研究，臺灣土地研究，10(1)。闕雅文、鄧秋玲、鄧雁文(2013). 台灣、日本溫泉旅館特徵屬性與價格分析，台灣國際研究季刊， 9(3)，175-98。廖咸興、張芳玲(1997). 不動產評價模式特徵價格法與逼近調整法之比較，住宅學報，(5)。陳信字、楊育誠(2019). 優質酒品認證標誌之特徵價格研究－以高粱酒為例，應用經濟論叢，106。英文部分Andrew Adewale Alola, Gizem Uzuner (2021). Testing the asymmetric causal nexus of housing-oil prices and pandemic uncertainty in four major economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 60550–60556.Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox(1964), An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 211-243.Bingbing Wang. (2021). How Does COVID-19 Affect House Prices? A Cross-City Analysis.Chau, K. W., & Chin, T. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 27(2), 145-165.Chang-Hee Christine Baea, Myung-Jin Junb, Hyeon Park. (2003). The Impact of Seoul’s Subway Line 5 on Residential Property Values. Transport Policy, 10, 85–94.David C. Ling, Chongyu Wang, Tingyu Zhou. (2020). A First Look at the Impact of COVID-19 on Commercial Real Estate Prices: Asset-Level Evidence.Graves, P., Murdoch, J.C., Thayer, M.A., and Waldman, D.(1988). The Robustness of Hedonic Price Estimation Urban Air Quality”, Land Economics, 64(3), 220-233.Greg Brown, Hunter Glanz.(2018). Identifying potential NIMBY and YIMBY effects in general land use planning and zoning. Applied Geography.Groothuis, P.A. and G. Miller. (1994). Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities : The Influence of NIMBY Beliefs. American Journal of Economics and Socialogy.Haizhen Wen, Shuyuan Li, Eddie C.M. Hui, Yue Xiao, Hongjie Liu. (2022).Externality impacts of “Not in My Backyard” facilities on property values : Evidence from the Hangzhou waste sorting and reduction complex projects. HabitatInternational, 125.Haizhen Wen, Zaiyuan Gui, Chuanhao Tian, Yue Xiao and Li Fang. (2018). Subway Opening, Traffic Accessibility, and Housing Prices: A Quantile Hedonic Analysis in Hangzhou, China.Harun Tanrivermis. (2022). Possible impacts of COVID-19 outbreak on real estate sector and possible changes to adopt: A situation analysis and general assessmenton Turkish perspective. Journal of Urban Management, 9, 263-269.Jim. C.Y., Wendy Y. Chen. (2006). Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning,78, 422–434.Jim. C.Y, Wendy Y. Chen. (2007). Consumption preferences and environmental externalities : A hedonic analysis of the housing market in Guangzhou.Geoforum, 38, 414–431.Ka Shing Cheung, Chung Yim Yiu and Chuyi Xiong. (2021). A Price Gradient Analysis from the COVID-19 Epicentre in China.Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Tzoulas, T., & Snabb, K. (2013). Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 30–46.Kolbe, J. & Wustemann, H. (2015). Estimating the Value of urban green space- A hedonicpricing analysis of the housing market in Cologne, Germany, Economic Risk Berlin, 1-19.Lin, C.C.(1993) The Relationship between Rents and Prices of Owner-Occupied Housing in Taiwan”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 6, 25-54.Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy,74(2), 132-157Lake, R.W. (1993).Rethinking NIMBY. American Planning Association Journal.Machteld Joly & Simon De Jaeger. (2021). Not in my backyard: A hedonic approach to the construction timeline of wind turbines in Flanders, Belgium.Minhua Yang & Junni Zhou. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the housing market: evidence from the Yangtze river delta region in China.Maggie R. Hu, Adrian D. Lee, Dihan Zou. (2021). COVID-19 and Housing Prices: Australian Evidence with Daily Hedonic Returns.Nicola, Maria, Zaid Alsafi, Catrin Sohrabi, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, Maliha Agha, and Riaz Agha. (2020).The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic : A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78, 185–93.Oded B., Qian W. (2008). Locating a Semi-Obnoxious Facility with Expropriation, Computer & Operations Research, 35(2), 392-403.Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.Xianhang Qian, Shanyun Qiu, Guangli Zhang. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on housing price : Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 43.Xinba Li, Chihwa Kao (2022). Spatial Analysis and Modeling of the Housing Value Changes in the U.S. during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Risk and Finanacial Management. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200884 en_US
