1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 臺北市公立國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾關係之研究
A Study of the Relationships among the Principles` Distributed Leadership, Teachers’ Professional Learning Community and Teachers` Organizational Commitment of Junior High Schools in Taipei City
作者 鄭旭宏
Cheng, Hsu-Hong
貢獻者 秦夢群
鄭旭宏
Cheng, Hsu-Hong
關鍵詞 校長分布式領導
教師專業學習社群
教師組織承諾
principals’ distributed leadership
teachers’ professional learning community
teachers` organizational commitment
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Aug-2022 18:43:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在瞭解當前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之現況。分析不同背景變項於臺北市公立國民中學教師之校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾的差異情形，並探討教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之關係，最後探究教師知覺校長分布式領導與教師專業學習社群對教師組織承諾之預測力分析。

本研究採用問卷調查法，共計抽樣 60 所臺北市公立國民中學，發出480 份問卷，共有415 份有效問卷，問卷有效率達86%。問卷調查結果以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與多元逐步迴歸之統計方法加以分析與探討。

本研究之數據分析結果如下：
1.目前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導為中高程度。
2.目前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺教師專業學習社群為中高程度。
3.目前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺教師組織承諾為中高程度。
4.臺北市公立國民中學教師因性別、教育程度、現任職務、學校規模與學校歷史之不同，於校長分布式領導具有顯著差異。
5.臺北市公立國民中學教師因性別、年齡、教育程度與服務年資之不同，於教師專業學習社群具有顯著差異。
6.臺北市公立國民中學教師因性別、年齡、服務年資、現任職務與學校規模之不同，於教師組織承諾具有顯著差異。
7.臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾及其各分層面，彼此具有正相關的關係。
8.臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導與教師專業學習社群僅對教師組織承諾中「組織認同」構面具有預測作用。

本研究依據研究結果提出建議與討論，以供教育行政機關、學校單位以及未來相關研究者後續之參考。
The purpose of the study was to investigate the current development of principals’ distributed leadership, teachers’ professional learning community and teachers` organizational commitment of junior high school in Taipei City. And to analyze the difference between teachers of different background variables, and to explore the relationship among the three variables. The study has aimed to predict teachers` organizational commitment through principals’ distributed leadership and teachers’ professional learning community.

Through the use of questionnaire survey method, a total of 60 junior high schools in Taipei City were sampled, 480 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 415 valid questionnaires were obtained, with an effective rate of 86%. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way-ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression analysis.

The conclusion of this study are as follows:
1.Junior high school teacher’s perception of principals’ distributed leadership is above average in Taipei City.
2.Junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers’ professional learning community is above average in Taipei City.
3.Junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers` organizational commitment is above average in Taipei City.
4.There is significant difference in the junior high school teacher’s perception of principals’ distributed leadership in terms of gender, education, position, scale of school and history of school in Taipei City.
5.There is significant difference in the junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers’ professional learning community in terms of gender, age, education, and years of service in Taipei City.
6.There is significant difference in the junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers` organizational commitment in terms of gender, age, years of service, position, and scale of school in Taipei City.
7.There is a positive correlation among principals’ distributed leadership, teachers’professional learning community and teachers` organizational commitment.
8.Principals’ distributed leadership and teachers’ professional learning community only have a predictive effect on the "organizational identity" dimension of teachers` organizational commitment.
參考文獻 中文文獻
丁一顧（2009）。教學導師運用認知教練提升初任教師心智能力之策略初探。銘傳教育電子期刊，32-50。https://reurl.cc/l9K3L6
王昭人（2011）。臺北市國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6j7hx7
王為國（2016）。問題本位實務社群在師資職前教育課程之應用與成效。臺中教育大學學報，30(1)，27-51。http://ord221145.ntcu.edu.tw/file/43334ab1_20181126.pdf
石淑旻（2021）。國民中小學校長教學領導、教師專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究：結合後設分析與路徑分析（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zq55rb
朱家昱（2015）。臺北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c8dz9q
何嘉惠（2018）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/scq25d
余泯蓁（2019）。新北市國民中學校長知識領導、學校內部行銷與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9r9x4w
吳俊憲（2010）。教師專業社群的理念與實施。靜宜大學師資培育中心實習輔導通訊，9，5-7。
吳清山（2019）。仁川宣言（2022年3月22日）。http://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=356133
吳清山、林天祐（2007）。實驗教育。教育研究月刊，155，168。
吳清山、林天祐（2014）。教育U辭書。高等教育出版。
吳慧蘭（2016）。新北市國民中學校長教學領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/687646
李安明（2017）。面向2030教育：聯合國教科文組織監測教育目標永續經營之挑戰、因應與啟示。教育研究月刊，281，4-12。http://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017090281001
李美雀（2018）。教師專業發展支持系統之探究：一位技術型高中教師的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(2)，46-49。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-2/topic/07.pdf
李重毅（2012）。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9jhts8
周昌柏（2007）。國小學校組織文化與教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，49，84-106。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200705.0084
林劭仁（2006）。專業學習社區運用於知識自我評價之知識。中正教育研究，5(2)，79-111。http://dx.doi.org/10.6357/CCES.200611.0079
林妤蓁、吳勁甫（2017）。教師專業學習社群研究之後設分析：教師與學校背景變項效應之探討。教育科學期刊，16(2)，27 - 52。
林奕成（2018）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x67v4q
林姝欣（2020）。新北市公私立高中職校長空間領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qmfm25
邱春堂（2010）。國民小學校長社會資本、教導型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/egu8jp
洪毓澤（2016）。國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業社群學習與教師教學效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d5q583
胡瓊之（2016）。桃園市國民中學校長科技領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8e6wb7
范熾文（2007）。教育績效責任：市場模式及其啟示。中等教育，58(3)，26-41。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2007.58.3.02
范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政，50，128-144。
范熾文、陳純慧（2010）。國民小學校長知識領導與教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，68，70-93。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201007.0070
夏偉傑（2015）。桃園市國民小學校長賦權增能領導行為、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dtsv25
孫志麟（2003）。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34(2)，139-156。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20020619
孫志麟（2010）。專業學習社群：促進教師專業發展的平台。學校行政，69，138-158。http://dx.doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201009.0138
徐合慶（2015）。國小校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾 與ICT運用關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pdt58s
秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。
秦夢群（2011）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫（2006）。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究。教育研究集刊，52（3），141-172。http://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/File/PDf/49208.pdf
袁亭雅（2020）。校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之後設分析（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pf74qu
張奕華、顏弘欽（2012）。學校分散式領導構面之探究分析: 領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證。教育理論與實踐學刊，25(2)，225-254。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201212.0225
張順發、羅希哲（2005）。國小教師工作價值觀與組織承諾關係之研究。國民教育研究學報，14，79-111。https://reurl.cc/jkKXrp
張德銳（2014）。教學行動研究：實用手冊與理論介紹。高等教育出版社。
張慶勳（1996）。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3p3z6r
教育部（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（2022年3月22日）。https://reurl.cc/WkKeQO
教育部（2011）。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點（2022年3月22日）。http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/userfiles/url/20120921155650/dma7db0b07090d0d0c9.pdf
教育部（2011）。教師專業學習社群-領頭羊葵花寶典（2022年3月22日）。https://course04.aide.gov.tw/uploadfiles/annex/20201209135020_1.pdf
教育部（2014）。108課綱資訊網。（2022年3月22日）https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2022年3月22日）。https://reurl.cc/5G9bZn
教育部（2021）。重大教育政策發展歷程（2022年3月22日）。https://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=7
郭實渝（2008）。教學建構主義的哲學基礎。臺東大學教育學報，19(2)，119-142。https://doi.org/10.6778/NTTUERJ.200812.0119
陳佩英、焦傳金（2009）。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構：一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊，54(1)，55-86。http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/bitstream/20.500.12235/11728/1/ntnulib_ja_L0807_5401_055.pdf
陳俊鴻（2018）。新北市國民中學校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2xne55
陳勇全（2008）。國民小學教師工作壓力、組織氣氛與組織承諾相關之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6tjjn
陳建志、鐘巧如（2014）。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊，10(3)，1-24。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042014091003001
陳瑞惠（2002）。私立高中教師工作價值觀、工作壓力與組織承諾之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w5wc37
陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。學富文化。
單文經（2020）。在十二年國教課綱「總綱」中遇見杜威。當代教育研究季刊，28(2)，1-29。http://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202006_28(2).0001
曾柏璣（2016）。臺北市國民小學校長知識領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y7ezrf
黃旭鈞（2017）。以智慧走察提升教師專業發展的理念與實踐策略。教育行政與評鑑學刊，22，1-26。https://adeva.utaipei.edu.tw/var/file/61/1061/img/336981860.pdf
黃宗顯（2008）。領導理論研究概覽。五南。
黃建翔、吳清山（2013）。提升教師專業學習社群之可行性策略研究：資料導向決定觀點。教育研究學報，47(1)，39-58。
黃政傑、林佩璇（2013）。合作學習。五南。
黃素惠（2006）。從組織承諾談提昇教師組織承諾之啟示。教育暨外國語文學報，3，1-21。
黃藍琪、賴志峰（2013）。國民中學教師領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，87，30-58。
臺北市政府教育局（2021）。臺北市政府教育局111年施政重點與施政計畫（2022年3月22日）。https://reurl.cc/zMnK3V
趙志林（2008）。臺北市國民小學校長真誠領導、教師正向心理資本與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6jt46n
劉春榮（1993）。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6t37ug
蔡明貴（2022）。新北市國民小學校長科技領導、學習型組織 與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s5u6p7
蔡舒文（2012）。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9876ph
賴志峰（2008）。分佈式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報，20，87-113。
賴志峰、秦夢群（2014）。國民中、小學分布式領導層面之建構與驗證。中正教育研究，13(2)，29-70。https://doi.org/10.3966/168395522014121302002
戴言儒（2019）。臺北市國民中學校長知識領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/69hqnh
謝傳崇、李孟雪（2017）。國民小學校長翻轉領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學創新關係之研究。教育政策論壇，20(2)，151-184。
羅昌龍（2018）。臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/92x34h
蘇恆毅（2015）。國民中學校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/45k852


英文文獻

Barnard, C. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(91)90081-J
Beckmann, E. A. (2017). Leadership through fellowship: distributed leadership in a professional recognition scheme for university educators. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(2), 155-168.https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276663
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
Brown, C., Flood, J., Armstrong, P., MacGregor, S., & Chinas, C. (2021). Capital across professional learning networks? Exploring a case from England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 6(1), 64-78.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-02-2020-0010
Brown, M. H., & Hosking, D. M. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations, 39(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603900104Denee, R., & Thornton, K. (2021). Distributed leadership in ECE: perceptions and practices. Early Years, 41(2), 128-143.https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1539702
Duignan, J. (2003). Placement and adding value to the academic performance of undergraduates: reconfiguring the architecture - an empirical investigation. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 55(3), 335-350.https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200233
Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324-340.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x
Elliott, D. J. (1996). Consciousness, culture and curriculum. International Journal of Music Education, 28(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1177/025576149602800101
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
Gibb, J. R, Platts, G. N., & Miller, L. F. (1951). Dynamics of participative groups. J. Swift Co.
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05278189
Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760802014951
Gressick, J., & Derry, S. (2011). Distributed leadership in online groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 211–236.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X0002830064
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Mulford, B. (2006). Models of successful principal leadership. School Leadership and Management, 26(4), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430600886921
Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.625111
Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal`s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. L. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Corwin Press.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219523
Harris, A. (2005). Reflections on distributed leadership. Management in Education, 19(2), 10-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206050190020301
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Hartley, D. (2009). Education policy, distributed leadership and socio‐cultural theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 139-150. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131910902844721
Ho, J., & Ng, D. (2017). Tensions in distributed leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 223-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16681630
Ho, J., Ong, M., & Tan, L. S. (2019). Leadership of professional learning communities in Singapore schools: The tight–loose balance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219833698
Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., Sego, D., Hedlund, J., Major, D., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Decision Performance in Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.292
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities. https://sedl.org/pubs/change34/plc-cha34.pdf
Hord, S. M. (1998). Creating a professional learning community: Cottonwood creek school. Issues about change, 6(2), 2-9.
Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40-43.
Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393833
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Re-culturing schools as professional learning communities. Scarecrow Education.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, H. V. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 728-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11402065
Kallio, J. M., & Halverson, R. (2019). Distributed leadership for personalized learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1734508
Klar, H. W. (2012). Fostering department chair instructional leadership capacity: Laying the groundwork for distributed instructional leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(2), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.577910
Lakshmanan, A., Health, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2010). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20404
Lárusdóttir, S. T., & O’Connor, E. (2017). Distributed leadership and middle leadership practice in schools: a disconnect? Irish Educational Studies, 36(4), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1333444
Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.006
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools: An introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Open University Press.
Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall. https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/activity-consciousness.pdf
Lumby, J. (2017). Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217711190
Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/256492
Moon, M. J. (2000). Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level. Public performance & management review, thousand oaks, 24(2), 177-194.
Morris, J. H., & Steers, R. M. (1980). Structural influences on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90014-7
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.
Ng, P. T. (2008). Developing forward-looking and innovative school leaders: The Singapore leaders in education programme. Professional Development in Education, 34(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580801951053
Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9042-x
Ng, P. T. (2009). Examining the use of new science metaphors in learning organisation. The Learning Organization, 16(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470910939224
Ng, P. T. (2011). How participants understand complexity theory through a school leadership programme in Singapore. International Journal on Complexity in Leadership and Management, 1(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCLM.2011.042551
Ng, P. T. (2013). Developing Singapore school leaders to handle complexity in times of uncertainty. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9253-1
Ng, P. T., & Liang, T. Y. (2010). Educational institution reform: Insights from the complexity-intelligence strategy. Human Systems Management, 29(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-2010-0709
Nguni, S., & Sleegers, P. (2007). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers` job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746
Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2007). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565795
Sergiovanni, T. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sewerin, T., & Holmberg, R. (2017). Contextualizing distributed leadership in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1280-1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1303453
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.008
Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316102237672
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391745
Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2007). Dynamics of change: decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9016-4
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. https://edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/A_Nation_At_Risk_1983.pdf
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
Tian, M., & Nutbrown, G. (2021). Retheorising distributed leadership through epistemic injustice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211022776
Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(7), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038545
Torrance, D. (2015). Professional learning for distributed leadership: primary headteachers’ perspectives. Professional Development in Education, 41(3), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.936025
UNESCO. (2015). World education forum adopts declaration on the future of education. https://en.unesco.org/news/world-education-forum-adopts-declaration-future-education
Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of departmental leadership for professional learning communities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17718023
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Wang, T. (2016). School leadership and professional learning community: case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1148849
Watson, C. (2012). Effective professional learning communities? The possibilities for teachers as agents of change in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3025
Whyte, W. H. (2002). The organization man. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wu, L., & Norman, I. J. (2006). An investigation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and role conflict and ambiguity in a sample of chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 26, 304-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.10.011
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
109171012
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109171012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 秦夢群zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄭旭宏zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Cheng, Hsu-Hongen_US
dc.creator (作者) 鄭旭宏zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Cheng, Hsu-Hongen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Aug-2022 18:43:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Aug-2022 18:43:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Aug-2022 18:43:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109171012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141318-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育行政與政策研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109171012zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在瞭解當前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之現況。分析不同背景變項於臺北市公立國民中學教師之校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾的差異情形，並探討教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之關係，最後探究教師知覺校長分布式領導與教師專業學習社群對教師組織承諾之預測力分析。

本研究採用問卷調查法，共計抽樣 60 所臺北市公立國民中學，發出480 份問卷，共有415 份有效問卷，問卷有效率達86%。問卷調查結果以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與多元逐步迴歸之統計方法加以分析與探討。

本研究之數據分析結果如下：
1.目前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導為中高程度。
2.目前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺教師專業學習社群為中高程度。
3.目前臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺教師組織承諾為中高程度。
4.臺北市公立國民中學教師因性別、教育程度、現任職務、學校規模與學校歷史之不同，於校長分布式領導具有顯著差異。
5.臺北市公立國民中學教師因性別、年齡、教育程度與服務年資之不同，於教師專業學習社群具有顯著差異。
6.臺北市公立國民中學教師因性別、年齡、服務年資、現任職務與學校規模之不同，於教師組織承諾具有顯著差異。
7.臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾及其各分層面，彼此具有正相關的關係。
8.臺北市公立國民中學教師知覺校長分布式領導與教師專業學習社群僅對教師組織承諾中「組織認同」構面具有預測作用。

本研究依據研究結果提出建議與討論，以供教育行政機關、學校單位以及未來相關研究者後續之參考。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of the study was to investigate the current development of principals’ distributed leadership, teachers’ professional learning community and teachers` organizational commitment of junior high school in Taipei City. And to analyze the difference between teachers of different background variables, and to explore the relationship among the three variables. The study has aimed to predict teachers` organizational commitment through principals’ distributed leadership and teachers’ professional learning community.

Through the use of questionnaire survey method, a total of 60 junior high schools in Taipei City were sampled, 480 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 415 valid questionnaires were obtained, with an effective rate of 86%. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way-ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression analysis.

The conclusion of this study are as follows:
1.Junior high school teacher’s perception of principals’ distributed leadership is above average in Taipei City.
2.Junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers’ professional learning community is above average in Taipei City.
3.Junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers` organizational commitment is above average in Taipei City.
4.There is significant difference in the junior high school teacher’s perception of principals’ distributed leadership in terms of gender, education, position, scale of school and history of school in Taipei City.
5.There is significant difference in the junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers’ professional learning community in terms of gender, age, education, and years of service in Taipei City.
6.There is significant difference in the junior high school teacher’s perception of teachers` organizational commitment in terms of gender, age, years of service, position, and scale of school in Taipei City.
7.There is a positive correlation among principals’ distributed leadership, teachers’professional learning community and teachers` organizational commitment.
8.Principals’ distributed leadership and teachers’ professional learning community only have a predictive effect on the "organizational identity" dimension of teachers` organizational commitment.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 7
第三節 名詞釋義 9
第四節 研究方法與步驟 15
第五節 研究範圍與限制 18
第二章 文獻探討 21
第一節 校長分布式領導之意涵 21
第二節 教師專業學習社群之意涵 42
第三節 教師組織承諾之意涵 60
第四節 校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之相關研究 74
第三章 研究設計與實施 95
第一節 研究架構 95
第二節 研究對象 99
第三節 研究工具 104
第四節 實施程序 109
第五節 資料處理與分析 110
第四章 研究結果與分析 113
第一節 臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾現況之分析 113
第二節 不同背景變項臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾現況之差異分析 127
第三節 臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之相關分析 168
第四節 臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾之預測力 173
第五章 結論與建議 179
第一節 結論 179
第二節 討論 184
第三節 建議 187
參考文獻 191
中文文獻 191
英文文獻 198
附錄 207
附錄一 校長分布式領導量表授權書 207
附錄二 教師專業學習社群量表授權書 208
附錄三 教師組織承諾量表授權書 209
附錄四 校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾量表 210		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 8720780 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109171012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 校長分布式領導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教師專業學習社群zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教師組織承諾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) principals’ distributed leadershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) teachers’ professional learning communityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) teachers` organizational commitmenten_US
dc.title (題名) 臺北市公立國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾關係之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study of the Relationships among the Principles` Distributed Leadership, Teachers’ Professional Learning Community and Teachers` Organizational Commitment of Junior High Schools in Taipei Cityen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻
丁一顧（2009）。教學導師運用認知教練提升初任教師心智能力之策略初探。銘傳教育電子期刊，32-50。https://reurl.cc/l9K3L6
王昭人（2011）。臺北市國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6j7hx7
王為國（2016）。問題本位實務社群在師資職前教育課程之應用與成效。臺中教育大學學報，30(1)，27-51。http://ord221145.ntcu.edu.tw/file/43334ab1_20181126.pdf
石淑旻（2021）。國民中小學校長教學領導、教師專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究：結合後設分析與路徑分析（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zq55rb
朱家昱（2015）。臺北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c8dz9q
何嘉惠（2018）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/scq25d
余泯蓁（2019）。新北市國民中學校長知識領導、學校內部行銷與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9r9x4w
吳俊憲（2010）。教師專業社群的理念與實施。靜宜大學師資培育中心實習輔導通訊，9，5-7。
吳清山（2019）。仁川宣言（2022年3月22日）。http://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=356133
吳清山、林天祐（2007）。實驗教育。教育研究月刊，155，168。
吳清山、林天祐（2014）。教育U辭書。高等教育出版。
吳慧蘭（2016）。新北市國民中學校長教學領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/687646
李安明（2017）。面向2030教育：聯合國教科文組織監測教育目標永續經營之挑戰、因應與啟示。教育研究月刊，281，4-12。http://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017090281001
李美雀（2018）。教師專業發展支持系統之探究：一位技術型高中教師的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(2)，46-49。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-2/topic/07.pdf
李重毅（2012）。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9jhts8
周昌柏（2007）。國小學校組織文化與教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，49，84-106。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200705.0084
林劭仁（2006）。專業學習社區運用於知識自我評價之知識。中正教育研究，5(2)，79-111。http://dx.doi.org/10.6357/CCES.200611.0079
林妤蓁、吳勁甫（2017）。教師專業學習社群研究之後設分析：教師與學校背景變項效應之探討。教育科學期刊，16(2)，27 - 52。
林奕成（2018）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x67v4q
林姝欣（2020）。新北市公私立高中職校長空間領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qmfm25
邱春堂（2010）。國民小學校長社會資本、教導型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/egu8jp
洪毓澤（2016）。國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業社群學習與教師教學效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d5q583
胡瓊之（2016）。桃園市國民中學校長科技領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8e6wb7
范熾文（2007）。教育績效責任：市場模式及其啟示。中等教育，58(3)，26-41。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2007.58.3.02
范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政，50，128-144。
范熾文、陳純慧（2010）。國民小學校長知識領導與教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，68，70-93。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201007.0070
夏偉傑（2015）。桃園市國民小學校長賦權增能領導行為、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dtsv25
孫志麟（2003）。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34(2)，139-156。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20020619
孫志麟（2010）。專業學習社群：促進教師專業發展的平台。學校行政，69，138-158。http://dx.doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201009.0138
徐合慶（2015）。國小校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾 與ICT運用關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pdt58s
秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。
秦夢群（2011）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫（2006）。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究。教育研究集刊，52（3），141-172。http://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/File/PDf/49208.pdf
袁亭雅（2020）。校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之後設分析（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pf74qu
張奕華、顏弘欽（2012）。學校分散式領導構面之探究分析: 領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證。教育理論與實踐學刊，25(2)，225-254。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201212.0225
張順發、羅希哲（2005）。國小教師工作價值觀與組織承諾關係之研究。國民教育研究學報，14，79-111。https://reurl.cc/jkKXrp
張德銳（2014）。教學行動研究：實用手冊與理論介紹。高等教育出版社。
張慶勳（1996）。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3p3z6r
教育部（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（2022年3月22日）。https://reurl.cc/WkKeQO
教育部（2011）。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點（2022年3月22日）。http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/userfiles/url/20120921155650/dma7db0b07090d0d0c9.pdf
教育部（2011）。教師專業學習社群-領頭羊葵花寶典（2022年3月22日）。https://course04.aide.gov.tw/uploadfiles/annex/20201209135020_1.pdf
教育部（2014）。108課綱資訊網。（2022年3月22日）https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2022年3月22日）。https://reurl.cc/5G9bZn
教育部（2021）。重大教育政策發展歷程（2022年3月22日）。https://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=7
郭實渝（2008）。教學建構主義的哲學基礎。臺東大學教育學報，19(2)，119-142。https://doi.org/10.6778/NTTUERJ.200812.0119
陳佩英、焦傳金（2009）。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構：一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊，54(1)，55-86。http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/bitstream/20.500.12235/11728/1/ntnulib_ja_L0807_5401_055.pdf
陳俊鴻（2018）。新北市國民中學校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2xne55
陳勇全（2008）。國民小學教師工作壓力、組織氣氛與組織承諾相關之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6tjjn
陳建志、鐘巧如（2014）。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊，10(3)，1-24。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042014091003001
陳瑞惠（2002）。私立高中教師工作價值觀、工作壓力與組織承諾之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w5wc37
陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。學富文化。
單文經（2020）。在十二年國教課綱「總綱」中遇見杜威。當代教育研究季刊，28(2)，1-29。http://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202006_28(2).0001
曾柏璣（2016）。臺北市國民小學校長知識領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y7ezrf
黃旭鈞（2017）。以智慧走察提升教師專業發展的理念與實踐策略。教育行政與評鑑學刊，22，1-26。https://adeva.utaipei.edu.tw/var/file/61/1061/img/336981860.pdf
黃宗顯（2008）。領導理論研究概覽。五南。
黃建翔、吳清山（2013）。提升教師專業學習社群之可行性策略研究：資料導向決定觀點。教育研究學報，47(1)，39-58。
黃政傑、林佩璇（2013）。合作學習。五南。
黃素惠（2006）。從組織承諾談提昇教師組織承諾之啟示。教育暨外國語文學報，3，1-21。
黃藍琪、賴志峰（2013）。國民中學教師領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，87，30-58。
臺北市政府教育局（2021）。臺北市政府教育局111年施政重點與施政計畫（2022年3月22日）。https://reurl.cc/zMnK3V
趙志林（2008）。臺北市國民小學校長真誠領導、教師正向心理資本與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6jt46n
劉春榮（1993）。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6t37ug
蔡明貴（2022）。新北市國民小學校長科技領導、學習型組織 與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s5u6p7
蔡舒文（2012）。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9876ph
賴志峰（2008）。分佈式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報，20，87-113。
賴志峰、秦夢群（2014）。國民中、小學分布式領導層面之建構與驗證。中正教育研究，13(2)，29-70。https://doi.org/10.3966/168395522014121302002
戴言儒（2019）。臺北市國民中學校長知識領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/69hqnh
謝傳崇、李孟雪（2017）。國民小學校長翻轉領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學創新關係之研究。教育政策論壇，20(2)，151-184。
羅昌龍（2018）。臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/92x34h
蘇恆毅（2015）。國民中學校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/45k852


英文文獻

Barnard, C. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(91)90081-J
Beckmann, E. A. (2017). Leadership through fellowship: distributed leadership in a professional recognition scheme for university educators. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(2), 155-168.https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276663
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
Brown, C., Flood, J., Armstrong, P., MacGregor, S., & Chinas, C. (2021). Capital across professional learning networks? Exploring a case from England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 6(1), 64-78.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-02-2020-0010
Brown, M. H., & Hosking, D. M. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations, 39(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603900104Denee, R., & Thornton, K. (2021). Distributed leadership in ECE: perceptions and practices. Early Years, 41(2), 128-143.https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1539702
Duignan, J. (2003). Placement and adding value to the academic performance of undergraduates: reconfiguring the architecture - an empirical investigation. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 55(3), 335-350.https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200233
Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324-340.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x
Elliott, D. J. (1996). Consciousness, culture and curriculum. International Journal of Music Education, 28(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1177/025576149602800101
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
Gibb, J. R, Platts, G. N., & Miller, L. F. (1951). Dynamics of participative groups. J. Swift Co.
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05278189
Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760802014951
Gressick, J., & Derry, S. (2011). Distributed leadership in online groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 211–236.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X0002830064
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Mulford, B. (2006). Models of successful principal leadership. School Leadership and Management, 26(4), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430600886921
Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.625111
Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal`s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. L. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Corwin Press.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219523
Harris, A. (2005). Reflections on distributed leadership. Management in Education, 19(2), 10-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206050190020301
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Hartley, D. (2009). Education policy, distributed leadership and socio‐cultural theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 139-150. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131910902844721
Ho, J., & Ng, D. (2017). Tensions in distributed leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 223-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16681630
Ho, J., Ong, M., & Tan, L. S. (2019). Leadership of professional learning communities in Singapore schools: The tight–loose balance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219833698
Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., Sego, D., Hedlund, J., Major, D., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Decision Performance in Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.292
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities. https://sedl.org/pubs/change34/plc-cha34.pdf
Hord, S. M. (1998). Creating a professional learning community: Cottonwood creek school. Issues about change, 6(2), 2-9.
Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40-43.
Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393833
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Re-culturing schools as professional learning communities. Scarecrow Education.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, H. V. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 728-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11402065
Kallio, J. M., & Halverson, R. (2019). Distributed leadership for personalized learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1734508
Klar, H. W. (2012). Fostering department chair instructional leadership capacity: Laying the groundwork for distributed instructional leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(2), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.577910
Lakshmanan, A., Health, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2010). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20404
Lárusdóttir, S. T., & O’Connor, E. (2017). Distributed leadership and middle leadership practice in schools: a disconnect? Irish Educational Studies, 36(4), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1333444
Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.006
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools: An introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Open University Press.
Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall. https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/activity-consciousness.pdf
Lumby, J. (2017). Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217711190
Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/256492
Moon, M. J. (2000). Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level. Public performance & management review, thousand oaks, 24(2), 177-194.
Morris, J. H., & Steers, R. M. (1980). Structural influences on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90014-7
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.
Ng, P. T. (2008). Developing forward-looking and innovative school leaders: The Singapore leaders in education programme. Professional Development in Education, 34(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580801951053
Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9042-x
Ng, P. T. (2009). Examining the use of new science metaphors in learning organisation. The Learning Organization, 16(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470910939224
Ng, P. T. (2011). How participants understand complexity theory through a school leadership programme in Singapore. International Journal on Complexity in Leadership and Management, 1(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCLM.2011.042551
Ng, P. T. (2013). Developing Singapore school leaders to handle complexity in times of uncertainty. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9253-1
Ng, P. T., & Liang, T. Y. (2010). Educational institution reform: Insights from the complexity-intelligence strategy. Human Systems Management, 29(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-2010-0709
Nguni, S., & Sleegers, P. (2007). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers` job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746
Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2007). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565795
Sergiovanni, T. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sewerin, T., & Holmberg, R. (2017). Contextualizing distributed leadership in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1280-1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1303453
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.008
Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316102237672
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391745
Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2007). Dynamics of change: decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9016-4
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. https://edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/A_Nation_At_Risk_1983.pdf
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
Tian, M., & Nutbrown, G. (2021). Retheorising distributed leadership through epistemic injustice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211022776
Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(7), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038545
Torrance, D. (2015). Professional learning for distributed leadership: primary headteachers’ perspectives. Professional Development in Education, 41(3), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.936025
UNESCO. (2015). World education forum adopts declaration on the future of education. https://en.unesco.org/news/world-education-forum-adopts-declaration-future-education
Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of departmental leadership for professional learning communities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17718023
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Wang, T. (2016). School leadership and professional learning community: case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1148849
Watson, C. (2012). Effective professional learning communities? The possibilities for teachers as agents of change in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3025
Whyte, W. H. (2002). The organization man. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wu, L., & Norman, I. J. (2006). An investigation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and role conflict and ambiguity in a sample of chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 26, 304-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.10.011		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202201034en_US