1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 師資培育研究之文獻計量分析
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Teacher Education
作者 洪雅文
Hung, Ya-Wen
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng-Ta
洪雅文
Hung, Ya-Wen
關鍵詞 師資培育
教師培訓
文獻計量學
Bibliometrix
Biblioshiny
知識基礎
研究熱點
主題演進
Teacher education
Teacher training
Bibliometrics
Bibliometrix
Biblioshiny
Intellectual base
Research hotspot
Thematic evolution
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Aug-2022 18:48:01 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在探討師資培育之知識基礎、研究熱點及主題演進趨勢，採用文獻計量法，以Web of Science核心合輯資料庫為研究資料，並以「Teacher Education（師資培育）」or「Teacher Training（教師培訓）」and「Initial Teacher Training（職前培訓）」or「Educational Practicum（教育實習）」or「In-Service Teacher Education（在職培育）」為檢索詞，經設定檢索條件，並將無效文獻排除及資料預處理後，符合上述條件之文獻共1,133篇。再進一步利用義大利那不勒斯腓特烈二世大學(University of Naples Federico II)Aria及Cuccurullo教授所開發的Bibliometrix疊加Biblioshiny統計軟體套件進行各項可視化圖譜分析。
本研究師資培育之知識基礎以高被引文獻分析結果發現Baumert et al (2010)、Pianta et al (2008)、Reay (2016)、Avramidis et al (2000)及Richter et al (2014)等文獻；以歷史文獻被引時序分析結果發現Baumert et al (2010)、Pianta et al (2008)、Avramidis et al (2000)、Richter et al (2011)、Armour and Yelling (2007)等文獻；共被引聚類分析結果發現「教師專業發展」、「教師實踐反思」、「師資培育改革」、「師資培育質性研究」等4個聚類為知識基礎之代表。
本研究師資培育之研究熱點以高頻關鍵詞共現分析結果發現「師資培育」、「教師培訓」、「專業發展」、「初任教師培訓」等關鍵詞；以關鍵詞聚類分析結果發現「師資培育」、「融合教育」、「教師培訓」、「專業發展」、「初任師資培育」、「教師」及「改善課堂教學」等為研究熱點之代表。
本研究師資培育之主題演進趨勢以桑基圖分析結果發現「專業發展」、「初任教師培訓」、「師資培育」、「教師培訓」及「在職師資培育」等聚類，從未消失在師資培育研究領域中，其中「師資培育」及「教師培訓」二個聚類，最終成為師資培育領域的核心主題，餘聚類在象限裡各有演進。
The purpose of this study was to explore the intellectual bases, research hotspots, and thematic evolution trends of teacher education. The study adopted the bibliometric method. The study took the core collection of the Web of Science database as research data, and used "Teacher Education" or "Teacher Training" and“Initial Teacher Training”or“Educational Practicum”or“In-Service Teacher Education" as the search terms. After excluding irrelevant references and data preprocessing, a total of 1,133 papers met the above conditions. The Biblioshiny statistical software suite superimposed on the Biblimetrix, which was developed by Professor Aria and Cuccurullo of the University of Naples Federico II in Italy, was further used for various visual maps analysis.
The intellectual bases of teacher education in this study was based on the results of most global cited documents analysis and found that Baumert et al (2010), Pianta et al (2008), Reay (2016), Avramidis et al (2000) and Richter et al (2014) were found; According to the results of the historiographic analysis, the papers of Baumert et al (2010), Pianta et al (2008), Avramidis et al (2000), Richter et al (2011), Armour and Yelling (2007) were discovered; The results of the cluster analysis showed that four clusters, namely "professional development of teachers", "reflection on teachers` practice", "reform of teacher education", and "qualitative research on teacher education", were the representatives of the intellectual bases.
The research hotspot of teacher education in this study indicated the keywords such as "teacher training", "teacher training", "professional development", and "initial teacher training" through the co-occurrence analysis of high-frequency keywords; According to the results of the keywords cluster analysis, teacher education, inclusive education, teacher training, professional development, initial teacher education, teachers, and improving classroom teaching, are representatives of research hotspots.
In this study, the theme evolution trend of teacher education was analyzed by the Sankey diagram, and it was found that the clusters of "professional development"," initial teacher training", "teacher education", "teacher training" and "in-service teacher education" have never disappeared in the field of teacher education research. In addition, the two clusters of "teacher education" and "teacher training" eventually became the core themes in the field of teacher education, and the remaining clusters had evolved in the entire quadrant.
參考文獻 王曰芬、宋爽、熊銘輝（2007）。基于共現分析的文本知識挖掘方法研究。圖書情報工作，51(4)，66-70。
王雁、王志強、馮雅靜、鄧猛、梁松梅（2015）。 隨班就讀教師專業素養現狀及影響因素研究。教師教育研究，27(4)，46-52。
何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。三民書局。
吳清山（2006）。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊，2(1)，1-31。
李昊（2018）。國際科研評價研究的科學計量及可視化分析——基于Biblioshiny程序。圖書情報導刊，3(12)，36-44。
李昊、潘宇光、王磊（2018）。Bibliometrix:一款新的基于R語言的文獻計量軟件介紹與評價。大學圖書情報學刊，36(4)，93-104。
李杰、陳超美(2017)。CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可視化。首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
周鈞（2010）。美國教師教育的第三條道路:教師培養的駐校模式。全球教育展望，39(9)，75-78。
科睿唯安(無日期)。Web of Science核心合輯，https://clarivate.com/zh-hant/solutions/web-of-science-core-collection
洪明、練柵柵（2015）。美國教師培養質量認證的新近改革—CAEP認證標準的背景、內容和特點探析。教育文化論壇，7(05)，1-5。
高燕林、王枬（2015）。美國臨床實踐型教師教育模式探析。教師教育學報，02。
師資培育法（民國108年12月11日）修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0050001
師範教育法（民國68年11月21日）公布。
徐鈺雯（2005）。國小師資供需失衡問題與因應措施之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北師範學院。
索磊（2009）。美國小學教師職前培養體制的演變與啟示。國教育研究，36(229)，28-33。
陳盈宏（2006）。解嚴後國小社會科教科書中國族概念之轉變。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
翁麗霞、洪明（2009）。美國選擇性教師培養路徑探略。教育發展研究，22，65-70。
張攸萍、吳政達（2019）。教育領域績效責任研究之發展及現況：文獻計量分析取向，教育研究月刊，6(302)，25-44。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019060302002
張霞（2016）。關注實踐:美國中小學教師培養模式的價值取向。天津師範大學學報(基礎教育版)，17(04)，63-67。
教育部（編）（2013）。中華民國師資培育白皮書-發揚師道、百年樹人。教育部。
教育部（編）（2018）。師資培育政策。教育部。
傅雅秀（1990）。以文獻引用分析評估海洋學期刊。教育資料與圖書館學，27(3)，311-322。
彭明輝（2017）。研究生完全求生手冊：方法、秘訣、潛規則。聯經出版公司。
馮璐、冷伏海（2006）。共詞分析方法理論進展。中國圖書館學報，32(162)，88-92。
楊智穎（2010）。1994年之後師資培育課程歷史變遷之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，6(1)，39-64。
趙蓉英、許麗敏（2010）。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿之知識圖譜探析。中國圖書館學報，36(189)，60-68。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。國立編繹館。
鍾德馨（2007）。少子化趨勢對國民教育師資供需影響與對策之研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
Academic Spin-Off of the University of Naples Federico II (n.d.). BIBLIOMETRIX. https://www.bibliometrix.org/home/index.php/faq
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Armour, K. M., & Yelling, M. (2007). Effective Professional Development for Physical Education Teachers: The Role of Informal, Collaborative Learning, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.26.2.177
Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and teacher education, 16(3), 277-293.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00062-1
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain.Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of mathematical sociology, 25(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http:// doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Berry, B., Montgomery, D., & Snyder, J. (2008). Urban teacher residency models and institutes of higher education: Implications for teacher preparation. Center for Teaching Quality.
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas‐about‐science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10136
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American educational research journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges; diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.
Coyle, D. (2006). Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Scottish languages review, 13(5), 1-18.
Clausen, S. E. (1998). Applied correspondence analysis: An introduction (Vol. 121). Sage.
Cameron, D. L., & Jortveit, M. (2014). Do different routes to becoming a special educator produce different understandings of the profession and its core concepts?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(4), 559-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933544
Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A statistical analysis of the literature.Science Progress (1916-1919),11(44), 578-596.
Croft, W. B., Metzler, D., & Strohman, T. (2010). Search engines: Information retrieval in practice (pp. 131-141). Reading Addison-Wesley.
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). 2022 CAEP Standards. http://caepnet.org/standards/2022-itp/introduction
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). History of CAEP. http://caepnet.org/about/history
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). Vision, Mission, & Goals. http://caepnet.org/about/vision-mission-goals
Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening Clinical Preparation: The Holy Grail of Teacher Education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.939009
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher,38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Degenne, A., & Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing social networks. Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. Internat-ional journal of inclusive education, 15(3), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information processing & management, 37(6), 817-842.
Egghe, L. (2005). "Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56 (7): 664–668. https://doi:10.1002/asi.20157. hdl:1942/737.
Esfahani, H., Tavasoli, K., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Big data and social media: A scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.2.007
Furlong, J. (2005). New Labour and teacher education: the end of an era. Oxford review of education, 31(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000337228
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Thousand, J. (2003). What do special educators need to know and be prepared to do for inclusive schooling to work?. Teacher education and special Education, 26(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640302600105
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science,122(3159), 108-111.
Garfield, E. (1964). " Science Citation Index"-a new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619), 649-654.
Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
Greenacre, M(1994).Correspondence Analysis and its interpretation. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.),Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences(pp.23-52).London: Academic Press.
Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf`s law for cities: an explanation. The Quarterly journal of economics, 114(3), 739-767.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Gross, P. L, & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66(1713), 385-389.
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.1.193
Hodkinson, A. (2010). Inclusive and special education in the English educational system: Historical perspectives, recent developments and future challenges. British Journal of Special Education, 37(2), 61-67.
Hulme, E. W. (1922). Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization. Butler & Tanner.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
Loreman, T. (2010). Essential inclusive education-related outcomes for Alberta preservice teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v56i2.55394
Leung, C. H., & Mak, K. Y. (2010). Training, understanding, and the attitudes of primary school teachers regarding inclusive education in Hong Kong. International Journal of inclusive education, 14(8), 829-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110902748947
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3-4), 251-264.
Mulenga, I. M. (2020). Teacher education versus teacher training: Epistemic practices and appropriate application of both terminologies. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology.,4(1), 105-126.
McKibbin, M. D. (2001). One size does not fit all: Reflections on alternative routes to teacher preparation in California. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1),133-149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478340
Okamoto, K., Chen, W., & Li, X. Y. (2008, June). Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. In International workshop on frontiers in algorithmics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network. (n.d.). Online Learning. https://www.pattan.net/training/online-learning/
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38. http://doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:13.0.CO;2-G
Poulou, M. (2007). Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: Student teachers’ perceptions. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066693
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Hamre, B. K., & Justice, L. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early childhood research quarterly, 23(4), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.02.001
Reay, D. (2006). The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British journal of educational studies, 54(3), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00351.x
Research HUB (2022.May 13). Bibliometrics (5): Pros and cons of different software﹝video﹞.YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r0xhpRXsjU
Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(1), 116-126.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Sawchuk, S. (2009). Teacher “residencies” get federal funding to augment training. Education Week, 29(7), 8-9.
Sharma, L. (2016). Teacher training and teacher education. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 1(8), 11-14.
Sinharay, S. (2010). An overview of statistics in education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education (pp.1-11) http://10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01719-X
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Smyth, J. (1988). Learning about teaching through clinical supervision. European Journal of Education, 23(4), 358-361.
Thanuskodi, S. (2010). Journal of Social Sciences: A bibliometric study. Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2010.11892847
The American Association of Physics Teachers (2009). The Role, Education, Qualifications, and Professional Development of Secondary School Physics Teachers.College Park
Tsay, M. and Shu, Z. (2011), "Journal bibliometric analysis: a case study on the Journal of Documentation", Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 806-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111164682
Turner, W., & Rojouan, F. (1991). Evaluating input/output relationships in a regional research network using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 22(1), 139-154.
Vanden Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2006). Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics,68(3), 377-393.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Walsh, K., & Jacobs, S. (2007). Alternative Certification Isn`t Alternative. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498382.pdf
Zipf, G. K. (2013). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Routledge.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
108911010
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108911010
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng-Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 洪雅文zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hung, Ya-Wenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 洪雅文zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hung, Ya-Wenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Aug-2022 18:48:01 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Aug-2022 18:48:01 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Aug-2022 18:48:01 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108911010en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141341-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 108911010zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討師資培育之知識基礎、研究熱點及主題演進趨勢，採用文獻計量法，以Web of Science核心合輯資料庫為研究資料，並以「Teacher Education（師資培育）」or「Teacher Training（教師培訓）」and「Initial Teacher Training（職前培訓）」or「Educational Practicum（教育實習）」or「In-Service Teacher Education（在職培育）」為檢索詞，經設定檢索條件，並將無效文獻排除及資料預處理後，符合上述條件之文獻共1,133篇。再進一步利用義大利那不勒斯腓特烈二世大學(University of Naples Federico II)Aria及Cuccurullo教授所開發的Bibliometrix疊加Biblioshiny統計軟體套件進行各項可視化圖譜分析。
本研究師資培育之知識基礎以高被引文獻分析結果發現Baumert et al (2010)、Pianta et al (2008)、Reay (2016)、Avramidis et al (2000)及Richter et al (2014)等文獻；以歷史文獻被引時序分析結果發現Baumert et al (2010)、Pianta et al (2008)、Avramidis et al (2000)、Richter et al (2011)、Armour and Yelling (2007)等文獻；共被引聚類分析結果發現「教師專業發展」、「教師實踐反思」、「師資培育改革」、「師資培育質性研究」等4個聚類為知識基礎之代表。
本研究師資培育之研究熱點以高頻關鍵詞共現分析結果發現「師資培育」、「教師培訓」、「專業發展」、「初任教師培訓」等關鍵詞；以關鍵詞聚類分析結果發現「師資培育」、「融合教育」、「教師培訓」、「專業發展」、「初任師資培育」、「教師」及「改善課堂教學」等為研究熱點之代表。
本研究師資培育之主題演進趨勢以桑基圖分析結果發現「專業發展」、「初任教師培訓」、「師資培育」、「教師培訓」及「在職師資培育」等聚類，從未消失在師資培育研究領域中，其中「師資培育」及「教師培訓」二個聚類，最終成為師資培育領域的核心主題，餘聚類在象限裡各有演進。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study was to explore the intellectual bases, research hotspots, and thematic evolution trends of teacher education. The study adopted the bibliometric method. The study took the core collection of the Web of Science database as research data, and used "Teacher Education" or "Teacher Training" and“Initial Teacher Training”or“Educational Practicum”or“In-Service Teacher Education" as the search terms. After excluding irrelevant references and data preprocessing, a total of 1,133 papers met the above conditions. The Biblioshiny statistical software suite superimposed on the Biblimetrix, which was developed by Professor Aria and Cuccurullo of the University of Naples Federico II in Italy, was further used for various visual maps analysis.
The intellectual bases of teacher education in this study was based on the results of most global cited documents analysis and found that Baumert et al (2010), Pianta et al (2008), Reay (2016), Avramidis et al (2000) and Richter et al (2014) were found; According to the results of the historiographic analysis, the papers of Baumert et al (2010), Pianta et al (2008), Avramidis et al (2000), Richter et al (2011), Armour and Yelling (2007) were discovered; The results of the cluster analysis showed that four clusters, namely "professional development of teachers", "reflection on teachers` practice", "reform of teacher education", and "qualitative research on teacher education", were the representatives of the intellectual bases.
The research hotspot of teacher education in this study indicated the keywords such as "teacher training", "teacher training", "professional development", and "initial teacher training" through the co-occurrence analysis of high-frequency keywords; According to the results of the keywords cluster analysis, teacher education, inclusive education, teacher training, professional development, initial teacher education, teachers, and improving classroom teaching, are representatives of research hotspots.
In this study, the theme evolution trend of teacher education was analyzed by the Sankey diagram, and it was found that the clusters of "professional development"," initial teacher training", "teacher education", "teacher training" and "in-service teacher education" have never disappeared in the field of teacher education research. In addition, the two clusters of "teacher education" and "teacher training" eventually became the core themes in the field of teacher education, and the remaining clusters had evolved in the entire quadrant.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 師資培育之概述 11
第二節 文獻計量學之概述 26
第三章 研究方法 36
第一節 研究架構 36
第二節 研究資料 38
第三節 研究工具 42
第四節 實施程序 47
第五節 資料處理與分析 52
第四章 研究結果分析與討論 54
第一節 師資培育文獻基本資料分析 54
第二節 師資培育研究之知識基礎分析 59
第三節 師資培育研究之研究熱點分析 77
第四節 師資培育研究之主題演進趨勢分析 100
第五章 結論與建議 117
第一節 研究結論 117
第二節 研究建議 126
參考文獻 130
中文部分 130
英文部分 133		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 6447973 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108911010en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 師資培育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教師培訓zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文獻計量學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bibliometrixzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Biblioshinyzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識基礎zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研究熱點zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主題演進zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teacher educationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teacher trainingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bibliometricsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bibliometrixen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Biblioshinyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Intellectual baseen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Research hotspoten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Thematic evolutionen_US
dc.title (題名) 師資培育研究之文獻計量分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Teacher Educationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王曰芬、宋爽、熊銘輝（2007）。基于共現分析的文本知識挖掘方法研究。圖書情報工作，51(4)，66-70。
王雁、王志強、馮雅靜、鄧猛、梁松梅（2015）。 隨班就讀教師專業素養現狀及影響因素研究。教師教育研究，27(4)，46-52。
何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。三民書局。
吳清山（2006）。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊，2(1)，1-31。
李昊（2018）。國際科研評價研究的科學計量及可視化分析——基于Biblioshiny程序。圖書情報導刊，3(12)，36-44。
李昊、潘宇光、王磊（2018）。Bibliometrix:一款新的基于R語言的文獻計量軟件介紹與評價。大學圖書情報學刊，36(4)，93-104。
李杰、陳超美(2017)。CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可視化。首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
周鈞（2010）。美國教師教育的第三條道路:教師培養的駐校模式。全球教育展望，39(9)，75-78。
科睿唯安(無日期)。Web of Science核心合輯，https://clarivate.com/zh-hant/solutions/web-of-science-core-collection
洪明、練柵柵（2015）。美國教師培養質量認證的新近改革—CAEP認證標準的背景、內容和特點探析。教育文化論壇，7(05)，1-5。
高燕林、王枬（2015）。美國臨床實踐型教師教育模式探析。教師教育學報，02。
師資培育法（民國108年12月11日）修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0050001
師範教育法（民國68年11月21日）公布。
徐鈺雯（2005）。國小師資供需失衡問題與因應措施之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北師範學院。
索磊（2009）。美國小學教師職前培養體制的演變與啟示。國教育研究，36(229)，28-33。
陳盈宏（2006）。解嚴後國小社會科教科書中國族概念之轉變。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
翁麗霞、洪明（2009）。美國選擇性教師培養路徑探略。教育發展研究，22，65-70。
張攸萍、吳政達（2019）。教育領域績效責任研究之發展及現況：文獻計量分析取向，教育研究月刊，6(302)，25-44。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019060302002
張霞（2016）。關注實踐:美國中小學教師培養模式的價值取向。天津師範大學學報(基礎教育版)，17(04)，63-67。
教育部（編）（2013）。中華民國師資培育白皮書-發揚師道、百年樹人。教育部。
教育部（編）（2018）。師資培育政策。教育部。
傅雅秀（1990）。以文獻引用分析評估海洋學期刊。教育資料與圖書館學，27(3)，311-322。
彭明輝（2017）。研究生完全求生手冊：方法、秘訣、潛規則。聯經出版公司。
馮璐、冷伏海（2006）。共詞分析方法理論進展。中國圖書館學報，32(162)，88-92。
楊智穎（2010）。1994年之後師資培育課程歷史變遷之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，6(1)，39-64。
趙蓉英、許麗敏（2010）。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿之知識圖譜探析。中國圖書館學報，36(189)，60-68。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。國立編繹館。
鍾德馨（2007）。少子化趨勢對國民教育師資供需影響與對策之研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
Academic Spin-Off of the University of Naples Federico II (n.d.). BIBLIOMETRIX. https://www.bibliometrix.org/home/index.php/faq
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Armour, K. M., & Yelling, M. (2007). Effective Professional Development for Physical Education Teachers: The Role of Informal, Collaborative Learning, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.26.2.177
Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and teacher education, 16(3), 277-293.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00062-1
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain.Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of mathematical sociology, 25(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http:// doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Berry, B., Montgomery, D., & Snyder, J. (2008). Urban teacher residency models and institutes of higher education: Implications for teacher preparation. Center for Teaching Quality.
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas‐about‐science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10136
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American educational research journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges; diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.
Coyle, D. (2006). Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Scottish languages review, 13(5), 1-18.
Clausen, S. E. (1998). Applied correspondence analysis: An introduction (Vol. 121). Sage.
Cameron, D. L., & Jortveit, M. (2014). Do different routes to becoming a special educator produce different understandings of the profession and its core concepts?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(4), 559-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933544
Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A statistical analysis of the literature.Science Progress (1916-1919),11(44), 578-596.
Croft, W. B., Metzler, D., & Strohman, T. (2010). Search engines: Information retrieval in practice (pp. 131-141). Reading Addison-Wesley.
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). 2022 CAEP Standards. http://caepnet.org/standards/2022-itp/introduction
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). History of CAEP. http://caepnet.org/about/history
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). Vision, Mission, & Goals. http://caepnet.org/about/vision-mission-goals
Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening Clinical Preparation: The Holy Grail of Teacher Education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.939009
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher,38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Degenne, A., & Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing social networks. Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. Internat-ional journal of inclusive education, 15(3), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information processing & management, 37(6), 817-842.
Egghe, L. (2005). "Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56 (7): 664–668. https://doi:10.1002/asi.20157. hdl:1942/737.
Esfahani, H., Tavasoli, K., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Big data and social media: A scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.2.007
Furlong, J. (2005). New Labour and teacher education: the end of an era. Oxford review of education, 31(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000337228
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Thousand, J. (2003). What do special educators need to know and be prepared to do for inclusive schooling to work?. Teacher education and special Education, 26(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640302600105
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science,122(3159), 108-111.
Garfield, E. (1964). " Science Citation Index"-a new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619), 649-654.
Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
Greenacre, M(1994).Correspondence Analysis and its interpretation. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.),Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences(pp.23-52).London: Academic Press.
Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf`s law for cities: an explanation. The Quarterly journal of economics, 114(3), 739-767.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Gross, P. L, & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66(1713), 385-389.
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.1.193
Hodkinson, A. (2010). Inclusive and special education in the English educational system: Historical perspectives, recent developments and future challenges. British Journal of Special Education, 37(2), 61-67.
Hulme, E. W. (1922). Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization. Butler & Tanner.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
Loreman, T. (2010). Essential inclusive education-related outcomes for Alberta preservice teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v56i2.55394
Leung, C. H., & Mak, K. Y. (2010). Training, understanding, and the attitudes of primary school teachers regarding inclusive education in Hong Kong. International Journal of inclusive education, 14(8), 829-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110902748947
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3-4), 251-264.
Mulenga, I. M. (2020). Teacher education versus teacher training: Epistemic practices and appropriate application of both terminologies. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology.,4(1), 105-126.
McKibbin, M. D. (2001). One size does not fit all: Reflections on alternative routes to teacher preparation in California. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1),133-149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478340
Okamoto, K., Chen, W., & Li, X. Y. (2008, June). Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. In International workshop on frontiers in algorithmics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network. (n.d.). Online Learning. https://www.pattan.net/training/online-learning/
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38. http://doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:13.0.CO;2-G
Poulou, M. (2007). Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: Student teachers’ perceptions. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066693
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Hamre, B. K., & Justice, L. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early childhood research quarterly, 23(4), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.02.001
Reay, D. (2006). The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British journal of educational studies, 54(3), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00351.x
Research HUB (2022.May 13). Bibliometrics (5): Pros and cons of different software﹝video﹞.YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r0xhpRXsjU
Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(1), 116-126.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Sawchuk, S. (2009). Teacher “residencies” get federal funding to augment training. Education Week, 29(7), 8-9.
Sharma, L. (2016). Teacher training and teacher education. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 1(8), 11-14.
Sinharay, S. (2010). An overview of statistics in education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education (pp.1-11) http://10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01719-X
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Smyth, J. (1988). Learning about teaching through clinical supervision. European Journal of Education, 23(4), 358-361.
Thanuskodi, S. (2010). Journal of Social Sciences: A bibliometric study. Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2010.11892847
The American Association of Physics Teachers (2009). The Role, Education, Qualifications, and Professional Development of Secondary School Physics Teachers.College Park
Tsay, M. and Shu, Z. (2011), "Journal bibliometric analysis: a case study on the Journal of Documentation", Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 806-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111164682
Turner, W., & Rojouan, F. (1991). Evaluating input/output relationships in a regional research network using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 22(1), 139-154.
Vanden Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2006). Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics,68(3), 377-393.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Walsh, K., & Jacobs, S. (2007). Alternative Certification Isn`t Alternative. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498382.pdf
Zipf, G. K. (2013). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Routledge.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200720en_US