1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 永續發展教育科研合作之文獻計量分析
Bibliometric Analysis of Collaboration in Education for Sustainable Development Research
作者 江佩容
Jiang, Pei-Rong
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng-Ta
江佩容
Jiang, Pei-Rong
關鍵詞 永續發展教育
科研合作
文獻計量分析
社會網絡分析
Education for sustainable development
Scientific collaboration
Bibliometric analysis
Social network analysis
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Aug-2022 18:49:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 隨著世界各國開始意識到當前地球環境變遷所帶來的危機，因而紛紛提倡永續發展之理念，推動各項相關的計畫，期望透過全球攜手合作，共同兼顧社會、環境、經濟三方面的和諧發展，更倡議以教育方式促進個體對永續發展議題思考及解決問題的能力，顯見永續發展教育之重要性。近年來，學者們對永續發展教育之研究產生了濃厚的興趣，並以科研合作的方式，結合各國不同的永續發展教育推行方式及實地研究，共創一科際整合之優質教育。
本研究將Web of Science核心合輯資料庫中「永續發展教育」主題之相關期刊文獻進行梳理，並透過R軟體套裝語法bibliometrix工具，以文獻計量分析和社會網絡分析方式，進一步繪製出合作網絡知識圖譜與世界合作地圖，接著依據科研合作分析指標：度中心性、接近中心性、中介中心性、PageRank值，以及文獻出版數量與身為第一作者發表數量，分析與探討永續發展教育科研合作之主要國家及地區、機構、作者，及其對學術的貢獻與發展趨勢。研究結果顯示，永續發展教育科研合作之文獻計量分析中，最主要的國家及地區為英國，其最緊密合作的國家為美國，且以歐洲的國家最為投入科研合作；主要的機構為葡萄牙的阿伯塔大學，且各機構以跨國合作的比例居多，尤以歐洲的高等教育機構最為投入科研合作；而最具影響力的主要作者為W. Leal Filho，與之最密切合作的科研夥伴為U.M. Azeiteiro‬。
綜合言之，本研究結果可供研究者或相關實務工作者，探求永續發展教育科研合作之情形，進一步了解及尋求相關的科研合作夥伴，更為促進永續發展教育之推動與共創新的科研合作項目。
With the countries around the world becoming aware of the crisis arising from the earth’s current environmental change, the countries have one after the other advocated the concept of sustainable development, with various related plans promoted. It is expected that through global collaboration, individuals’ contemplation on sustainable development issues and problem-solving ability can be advocated, taking into account harmonious developments in social, environmental, and economic aspects. This is a clear indication of the importance of education for sustainable development. In recent years, scholars have developed a keen interest in studying education for sustainable development. In addition, scientific collaboration, combined with education for sustainable development promotion methods from different countries and field research, have been adopted to create high-quality education on interdisciplinary teaching jointly.
This study compiled journal references related to “education for sustainable development” themes in the Web of Science Core Collection. Through the Biblioshiny Bibliometrix R-package tool, bibliometric analysis, and social network analysis, a collaboration network knowledge graph and a collaboration world map were drawn. Then, based on the scientific collaboration analysis indicators: degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, PageRank, the number of publications, and the number of first-author publications, the major countries and regions of scientific collaboration on education for sustainable development, institutions, authors, academic contributions, and development trends were analyzed and explored. The research results show that in the bibliometric analysis of collaboration on education for sustainable development, the major countries and regions include the United Kingdom, the United States with the closest cooperation ties with the UK, and European countries most involved in scientific collaboration. The main institutions include Universidade Aberta (Portugal); among the institutions, transnational cooperation comprised the majority, especially tertiary institutions in Europe most involved in scientific collaboration. The most influential primary author is W. Leal Filho, and his closest cooperation partner is U.M. Azeiteiro.
To sum up, the research results shall be provided to researchers or relevant practitioners in order to explore the situation of collaboration in education for sustainable development research and understand and seek related research collaborators. The promotion of education for sustainable development and the co-creation of new scientific collaboration items will also be promoted.
參考文獻 壹、中文文獻
王朝雲、劉玉龍（2007）。知識可視化的理論與應用。現代教育技術，17（6）， 18-20。
王新才、丁家友（2013）。大數據知識圖譜：概念、特徵、應用與影響。情報科學，31（9），10-14。
任紅娟、張志強（2009）。基於文獻計量的科學知識圖譜發展研究。情報雜誌，28（12），86-90。
行政院國家永續發展委員會（2004）。臺灣21世紀議程－國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。
吳清山、林天祐（2012）。永續發展教育。教育研究，219，129-130。
李杰（2018）。科學知識圖譜原理及應用——VOSviewer和CitNetExplorer初學者指南。高等教育出版社。
邱均平 (2001)。信息計量學（九）：第九講 文獻資訊引證規律和引文分析法。 情報理論與實踐，24（3），236-240。
侯海燕（2006）。基於知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究（未出版博士論文）。大連理工大學。
洪秀熒（2007）。 「優質學校教育指標」在學校行政上的啟示。學校行政，（52）， 63-78。
張金淑（2006）。永續校園的推動與展望。學校行政，（44），66-84。
張珍悅、徐勝一（2010）。永續發展教育脈絡探討：「聯合國永續發展教育十年計畫」之回顧。地理研究，（52），1-26。
張晗、王曉瑜、崔雷（2007）。共詞分析法與文獻被引次數結合研究專題領域的發展態勢。情報理論與實踐，30（3），378-380。
教育部（2020）。永續發展目標（SDGs）教育手冊：臺灣指南。永續循環校園推動辦公室。
郭文斌（2015）。知識圖譜理論在教育與心理研究中的應用。浙江大學出版社。
陳定權（2005）。同引分析與可視化技術。情報科學，23（4），532－537。
陳悅、陳超美、劉則淵、胡志剛、王賢文（2015）。CiteSpace知識圖譜的方法論功能。科學學研究，33（2），242-253。
陳悅、劉則淵（2005）。悄然興起的科學知識圖譜。科學學研究，23（2），149-154。
陳悅、劉則淵、陳勁、侯劍華（2008）。科學知識圖譜的發展歷程。科學學研究，26（3），449-460。
焦曉靜、王蘭成（2015）。知識圖譜的概念辨析與學科定位研究。圖書情報工作，59（15），5-11。
黃薏璇、吳政達（2017）。學校領導研究熱點與前沿的文獻計量分析(2000~2017)。教育研究月刊，282，114-131。
葉欣誠（2017）。探討環境教育與永續發展教育的發展脈絡。環境教育研究，13（2），67-109。
葉俊榮（2005）。轉型與發展：台灣 21 世紀議程－國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。研考雙月刊，29（5），6-18。
葉國樑、唐孝蘭、黃禎貞、陳佩君、陳美如（2006）。國中階段健康與體育學習領域之環境永續發展教育內涵與教學效果之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，（26），53-83。
趙國慶、黃榮懷、陸志堅（2005）。知識可視化的理論與方法。開放教育研究，11（1），23-27。
劉佳鎮（2010）。推動教育永續發展：學校應有之作為。學校行政，（68），116-126。
劉則淵、王賢文、陳超美（2009）。科學知識圖譜方法及其在科技情報中的應用。數位圖書館論壇，（10），14-34。
聶磊（2011）。 "結構洞"理論分析——解析《結構洞： 競爭的社會結構》。群文天地，8，280-281。

貳、英文文獻
Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1931
Agirreazkuenaga, L. (2020). Education for Agenda 2030: What direction do we want to take going forward?. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052035
Angeles Murga-Menoyo, M. (2009). The Earth Charter. A reference for the decade of education for sustainable development. REVISTA DE EDUCACION, 239-262.
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aikens, K., McKenzie, M., & Vaughter, P. (2016). Environmental and sustainability education policy research: A systematic review of methodological and thematic trends. Environmental Education Research, 22(3), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1135418
Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures. Human organization, 7(3), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.7.3.f4033344851gl053
Brookes, B. C. (1985). "Sources of information on specific subjects" by SC Bradford. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000406
Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 13-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00241.x
Briner, R. B., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. Handbook of evidence-based management: Companies, classrooms and research, 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840
Bollen, J., Rodriquez, M. A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z
Chen, C. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21694
Clarivate (2021). Web of Science. https://clarivate.com/zh-hant/solutions/web-of-science/
CONCERT (2021). Web of Science. https://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/database/31
Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford`s Law: Theory, empiricism and the gaps between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/7185
Desa, U. N. (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://stg-wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/11125/unepswiosm1inf7sdg.pdf?sequence=1
Davidson Frame, J., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social studies of science, 9(4), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900405
Durland, M. M., & Fredericks, K. A. (2005). An introduction to social network analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, 2005(107), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.157
Dellavalle, R. P., Schilling, L. M., Rodriguez, M. A., Van de Sompel, H., & Bollen, J. (2007). Refining dermatology journal impact factors using PageRank. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(1), 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.03.005
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Floyd, S. W., Schroeder, D. M., & Finn, D. M. (1994). “Only if I`m first author”: conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 734-747. https://doi.org/10.5465/256709
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108-111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1749965
Glavič, P. (2020). Identifying Key Issues of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(16), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166500
Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information Inc.
Huckle, J. (2002). Reconstructing nature: Towards a geographical education for sustanaible development. Geography, 87(1), 64-72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40573638
Haigh, M. (2003). Internationalising the university curriculum: Response to M.G. Jackson. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), 331-340. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278225387_Internationalising_the_university_curriculum_Response_to_MG_Jackson
Hook, P. A. (2007). Domain maps: purposes, history, parallels with cartography, and applications. In 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV`07) (pp. 442-446). IEEE.
Hakimi, S. L. (1964). Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Operations research, 12(3), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.12.3.450
Huang, J. H., Duan, X. Y., He, F. F., Wang, G. J., & Hu, X. Y. (2021). A historical review and Bibliometric analysis of research on Weak measurement research over the past decades based on Biblioshiny. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11375. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.11375.pdf
Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
Hasslöf, H., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Critical thinking as room for subjectification in Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.940854
Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. R. (1996). Education for sustainability. Earthscan.
Hinzen, H., & Schmitt, S. (2016). Agenda 2030-Education and lifelong learning in the sustainable development goals. DVV International, Institut für Internationale Zusammenarbeit des Deutschen Hochschul-Verbandes eV. https://www.dvv-international.de/fileadmin/files/Inhalte_Bilder_und_Dokumente/Materialien/IPE/IPE_75_EN_web.pdf
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists` perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291
Haustein, S., Tunger, D., Heinrichs, G., & Baelz, G. (2011). Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?. Scientometrics, 86(3), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4
Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 471-501. https://doi.org/10.5465/256589
Imperatives, S. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Accessed Feb, 10, 1-300. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Japhet, B. (2013). A critique of Latour and Woolgar`s argument for the social construction of scientific facts in laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts (1986). Социология науки и технологий, 4(4), 30-39. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-critique-of-Latour-and-Woolgar``s-argument-for-of-Japhet/cc335d6adc72e7520243261ab5f68c5eafde7930
Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 7(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
Kaivola, T., & Cabral, S. (2004). Implementing education for active citizenship and sustainability. Geography, 89(3), 278-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2004.12094106
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Lemons, J. (1992). Ecological Literacy and the University--Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World by David W. Orr. BioScience, 42(9), 708-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1312179
Lawani, S. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1-2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (Vol. 5). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261445?2=null&queryId=406f6610-30d6-4ce6-9f1f-2f29bff6834e
Logan, E. L., & Shaw, W. M. (1991). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in a medical specialty. Scientometrics, 20(3), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019762
Lou, W., & Qiu, J. (2014). Semantic information retrieval research based on co-occurrence analysis. Online Information Review, 38(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2012-0203
Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political economy, 108(3), 632-662. https://doi.org/10.1086/262132
Michie, J. (1994). Reviews -- Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition by Ronald S. Burt: The journal of the royal economic society. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 685-686. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234645
Molenda, M. (2003). Cone of experience. Educational technology: An encyclopedia, 161-165. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.612.454&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social networks, 24(4), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3
Massimo Aria (2021a). Bibliometrix R Package. https://www.bibliometrix.org/
Massimo Aria (2021b). biblioshiny for bibliometrix. http://127.0.0.1:6219/
McCormick, B. H., DeFanti, T. A., & Brown, M. D. (1987, November). Visualization in Scientific Computing. The NSF Advisory Panel on Computer Graphics, 21, 6, New York, NY, United States.
Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration. Scientometrics, 61(3), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000045120.04489.80
Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 800-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.006
McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE≠ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental education research, 9(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303469
McKeown, R., & Nolet, V. (2012). Schooling for sustainable development in Canada and the United States (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.
Mulà, I., & Tilbury, D. (2009). Progress and Possibilities for the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) in EU Member States: An ENSI report. Cheltenham, UK: ENSI. https://www.ensi.org/global/downloads/Publications/311/ENSI%20Report%20English.pdf
Newman, M. E. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 98(2), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
Nicolaisen, J., & Hjørland, B. (2007). Practical potentials of Bradford`s law: A critical examination of the received view. Journal of documentation, 63(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710743298
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.
Price, D. J. (1965). The science of science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 21(8), 2-8.
Postma, D. W. (2002). Taking the future seriously: On the inadequacies of the framework of liberalism for environmental education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00258
Prakash, M. S. (1995). Ecological literacy for moral virtue: Orr on [moral] education for postmodern sustainability. Journal of Moral Education, 24(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724950240101
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31–38. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G
Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 1115-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). Expectations for a scientific collaboratory: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work (pp. 68-74). https://doi.org/10.1145/958160.958171
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual review of information science and technology, 41(1), 643-681. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109-127. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1177/0038038588022001007
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of information Science, 6(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105
Selvi, M. (2004). Environmental education for sustainable development. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 13(9), 900-902. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285200240_Environmental_education_for_sustainable_development
Swedberg, R. (1994). Book reviews: Networks -- Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition by Ronald S. Burt. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 426-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234645
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer publishing company. https://parsmodir.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/MetaSynBook.pdf
Summers, M., Corney, G., & Childs, A. (2004). Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: the starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educational research, 46(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222449
Shu, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Looking Back to Move Forward: A Bibliometric Analysis of Consumer Privacy Research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 727-747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040042
Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental education research, 1(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010206
United Nations (1993). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/Agenda%2021.pdf
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992). Agenda 21. In United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (pp. 1–351), Rio de Janeiro: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21
United Nations Economic and Social Council (1996). Promoting education, public awareness and training：Report of the Secretary-General Addendum. https://undocs.org/en/E/CN.17/1996/14/Add.1
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1997). Educating for a sustainable future: a transdisciplinary vision for concerted action. International Conference on Environment and Society: Education and Public Awareness for Sustainability, Thessaloniki, Greece. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000110686?1=null&queryId=c5cfa07b-e935-4cc2-8432-34d2f063ad1f
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1988). Sustainable Development Via Environmental Education. UNESCO-UNEP environmental education newsletter, 13(2), 1-8. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000153582?1=null&queryId=58b4a822-8336-4584-9542-d29fabdd14f8
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2003). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014): Framework for the international implementation scheme. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000131163?6=null&queryId=abd54ffb-2e1e-4024-a552-3c232398f1f2
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2005). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014): international implementation scheme. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148654?3=null&queryId=e65ed52b-ef3e-4293-ab93-a6a40df3f06c
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2006). Framework for the UNDESD international implementation scheme. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148650?1=null&queryId=9dc4acc5-6b8b-467c-a624-2998b058c8d0
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development 2009: key findings & ways forward. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000187757
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2013, June). ESD: A sound investment to accelerate African development. https://i.unu.edu/media/unu.edu/event/35442/TICAD-V-Side-Event-UNESCO_1.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Division for Inclusion, Peace and Sustainable Development, Education Sector.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, & German Commission for UNESCO (2009). UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development: 31 March-2 April 2009, Bonn, Germany: proceedings. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000185056?8=null&queryId=18566c4a-ed6b-42c4-9b46-42bf6b85f5ef
Vilela, M. (2006). The Earth Charter and the quest for a more sustainable and peaceful world. Development, 49(3), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100278
Vanz, S. A. D. S., & Stumpf, I. R. C. (2010). Scientific collaboration: theoretical and conceptual review. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 15(2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362010000200004
Wals, A. E. J. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development: Learning for a sustainable world 2009. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000184944?1=null&queryId=aa0eb5df-11fd-43bb-9825-a253152bf36e
Wang, C. H., & Chen, S. C. (2014). Bibliometric and social network analysis for data mining: the intellectual structure of tourism destination literature. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 42(1), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20120285
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wenwen, W. U., Yaofei, X. I. E., Xiangxiang, L. I. U., Yaohua, G. U., Yuting ZHANG, X. T., & Xiaodong, T. A. N. (2019). Analysis of scientific collaboration networks among authors, institutions, and countries studying adolescent myopia prevention and control: a review article. Iranian journal of public health, 48(4), 621-631. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i4.983
World Education Forum. (2015). Incheon declaration: Education 2030-Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233137
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107-2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21128
Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., & Tsuji, K. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors` roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3), 643-655. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1007/s11192-006-0113-1
Zhou, J., Zeng, A., Fan, Y., & Di, Z. (2018). Identifying important scholars via directed scientific collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1327-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2619-0
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
108911024
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108911024
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng-Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 江佩容zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Jiang, Pei-Rongen_US
dc.creator (作者) 江佩容zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Jiang, Pei-Rongen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Aug-2022 18:49:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Aug-2022 18:49:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Aug-2022 18:49:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108911024en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141346-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 108911024zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著世界各國開始意識到當前地球環境變遷所帶來的危機，因而紛紛提倡永續發展之理念，推動各項相關的計畫，期望透過全球攜手合作，共同兼顧社會、環境、經濟三方面的和諧發展，更倡議以教育方式促進個體對永續發展議題思考及解決問題的能力，顯見永續發展教育之重要性。近年來，學者們對永續發展教育之研究產生了濃厚的興趣，並以科研合作的方式，結合各國不同的永續發展教育推行方式及實地研究，共創一科際整合之優質教育。
本研究將Web of Science核心合輯資料庫中「永續發展教育」主題之相關期刊文獻進行梳理，並透過R軟體套裝語法bibliometrix工具，以文獻計量分析和社會網絡分析方式，進一步繪製出合作網絡知識圖譜與世界合作地圖，接著依據科研合作分析指標：度中心性、接近中心性、中介中心性、PageRank值，以及文獻出版數量與身為第一作者發表數量，分析與探討永續發展教育科研合作之主要國家及地區、機構、作者，及其對學術的貢獻與發展趨勢。研究結果顯示，永續發展教育科研合作之文獻計量分析中，最主要的國家及地區為英國，其最緊密合作的國家為美國，且以歐洲的國家最為投入科研合作；主要的機構為葡萄牙的阿伯塔大學，且各機構以跨國合作的比例居多，尤以歐洲的高等教育機構最為投入科研合作；而最具影響力的主要作者為W. Leal Filho，與之最密切合作的科研夥伴為U.M. Azeiteiro‬。
綜合言之，本研究結果可供研究者或相關實務工作者，探求永續發展教育科研合作之情形，進一步了解及尋求相關的科研合作夥伴，更為促進永續發展教育之推動與共創新的科研合作項目。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the countries around the world becoming aware of the crisis arising from the earth’s current environmental change, the countries have one after the other advocated the concept of sustainable development, with various related plans promoted. It is expected that through global collaboration, individuals’ contemplation on sustainable development issues and problem-solving ability can be advocated, taking into account harmonious developments in social, environmental, and economic aspects. This is a clear indication of the importance of education for sustainable development. In recent years, scholars have developed a keen interest in studying education for sustainable development. In addition, scientific collaboration, combined with education for sustainable development promotion methods from different countries and field research, have been adopted to create high-quality education on interdisciplinary teaching jointly.
This study compiled journal references related to “education for sustainable development” themes in the Web of Science Core Collection. Through the Biblioshiny Bibliometrix R-package tool, bibliometric analysis, and social network analysis, a collaboration network knowledge graph and a collaboration world map were drawn. Then, based on the scientific collaboration analysis indicators: degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, PageRank, the number of publications, and the number of first-author publications, the major countries and regions of scientific collaboration on education for sustainable development, institutions, authors, academic contributions, and development trends were analyzed and explored. The research results show that in the bibliometric analysis of collaboration on education for sustainable development, the major countries and regions include the United Kingdom, the United States with the closest cooperation ties with the UK, and European countries most involved in scientific collaboration. The main institutions include Universidade Aberta (Portugal); among the institutions, transnational cooperation comprised the majority, especially tertiary institutions in Europe most involved in scientific collaboration. The most influential primary author is W. Leal Filho, and his closest cooperation partner is U.M. Azeiteiro.
To sum up, the research results shall be provided to researchers or relevant practitioners in order to explore the situation of collaboration in education for sustainable development research and understand and seek related research collaborators. The promotion of education for sustainable development and the co-creation of new scientific collaboration items will also be promoted.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 2
第三節 名詞釋義 3
第四節 研究方法與步驟 5
第五節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 永續發展教育及其研究歷程 11
第二節 科研合作之意涵及方法 21
第三節 科學知識圖譜概述與發展 28
第三章 研究設計與實施 37
第一節 研究架構 37
第二節 研究對象與取樣方法 38
第三節 研究方法 41
第四節 研究工具 45
第五節 資料處理與分析 48
第四章 研究結果與分析 55
第一節 永續發展教育國家及地區科研合作分析 55
第二節 永續發展教育機構科研合作分析 74
第三節 永續發展教育作者科研合作分析 91
第五章 研究結論與建議 109
第一節 研究結論 109
第二節 研究建議 113
參考文獻 116		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 5588112 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108911024en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 永續發展教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科研合作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文獻計量分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會網絡分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Education for sustainable developmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Scientific collaborationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bibliometric analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social network analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 永續發展教育科研合作之文獻計量分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Bibliometric Analysis of Collaboration in Education for Sustainable Development Researchen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文文獻
王朝雲、劉玉龍（2007）。知識可視化的理論與應用。現代教育技術，17（6）， 18-20。
王新才、丁家友（2013）。大數據知識圖譜：概念、特徵、應用與影響。情報科學，31（9），10-14。
任紅娟、張志強（2009）。基於文獻計量的科學知識圖譜發展研究。情報雜誌，28（12），86-90。
行政院國家永續發展委員會（2004）。臺灣21世紀議程－國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。
吳清山、林天祐（2012）。永續發展教育。教育研究，219，129-130。
李杰（2018）。科學知識圖譜原理及應用——VOSviewer和CitNetExplorer初學者指南。高等教育出版社。
邱均平 (2001)。信息計量學（九）：第九講 文獻資訊引證規律和引文分析法。 情報理論與實踐，24（3），236-240。
侯海燕（2006）。基於知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究（未出版博士論文）。大連理工大學。
洪秀熒（2007）。 「優質學校教育指標」在學校行政上的啟示。學校行政，（52）， 63-78。
張金淑（2006）。永續校園的推動與展望。學校行政，（44），66-84。
張珍悅、徐勝一（2010）。永續發展教育脈絡探討：「聯合國永續發展教育十年計畫」之回顧。地理研究，（52），1-26。
張晗、王曉瑜、崔雷（2007）。共詞分析法與文獻被引次數結合研究專題領域的發展態勢。情報理論與實踐，30（3），378-380。
教育部（2020）。永續發展目標（SDGs）教育手冊：臺灣指南。永續循環校園推動辦公室。
郭文斌（2015）。知識圖譜理論在教育與心理研究中的應用。浙江大學出版社。
陳定權（2005）。同引分析與可視化技術。情報科學，23（4），532－537。
陳悅、陳超美、劉則淵、胡志剛、王賢文（2015）。CiteSpace知識圖譜的方法論功能。科學學研究，33（2），242-253。
陳悅、劉則淵（2005）。悄然興起的科學知識圖譜。科學學研究，23（2），149-154。
陳悅、劉則淵、陳勁、侯劍華（2008）。科學知識圖譜的發展歷程。科學學研究，26（3），449-460。
焦曉靜、王蘭成（2015）。知識圖譜的概念辨析與學科定位研究。圖書情報工作，59（15），5-11。
黃薏璇、吳政達（2017）。學校領導研究熱點與前沿的文獻計量分析(2000~2017)。教育研究月刊，282，114-131。
葉欣誠（2017）。探討環境教育與永續發展教育的發展脈絡。環境教育研究，13（2），67-109。
葉俊榮（2005）。轉型與發展：台灣 21 世紀議程－國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。研考雙月刊，29（5），6-18。
葉國樑、唐孝蘭、黃禎貞、陳佩君、陳美如（2006）。國中階段健康與體育學習領域之環境永續發展教育內涵與教學效果之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，（26），53-83。
趙國慶、黃榮懷、陸志堅（2005）。知識可視化的理論與方法。開放教育研究，11（1），23-27。
劉佳鎮（2010）。推動教育永續發展：學校應有之作為。學校行政，（68），116-126。
劉則淵、王賢文、陳超美（2009）。科學知識圖譜方法及其在科技情報中的應用。數位圖書館論壇，（10），14-34。
聶磊（2011）。 "結構洞"理論分析——解析《結構洞： 競爭的社會結構》。群文天地，8，280-281。

貳、英文文獻
Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1931
Agirreazkuenaga, L. (2020). Education for Agenda 2030: What direction do we want to take going forward?. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052035
Angeles Murga-Menoyo, M. (2009). The Earth Charter. A reference for the decade of education for sustainable development. REVISTA DE EDUCACION, 239-262.
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aikens, K., McKenzie, M., & Vaughter, P. (2016). Environmental and sustainability education policy research: A systematic review of methodological and thematic trends. Environmental Education Research, 22(3), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1135418
Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures. Human organization, 7(3), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.7.3.f4033344851gl053
Brookes, B. C. (1985). "Sources of information on specific subjects" by SC Bradford. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000406
Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 13-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00241.x
Briner, R. B., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. Handbook of evidence-based management: Companies, classrooms and research, 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840
Bollen, J., Rodriquez, M. A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z
Chen, C. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21694
Clarivate (2021). Web of Science. https://clarivate.com/zh-hant/solutions/web-of-science/
CONCERT (2021). Web of Science. https://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/database/31
Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford`s Law: Theory, empiricism and the gaps between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/7185
Desa, U. N. (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://stg-wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/11125/unepswiosm1inf7sdg.pdf?sequence=1
Davidson Frame, J., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social studies of science, 9(4), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900405
Durland, M. M., & Fredericks, K. A. (2005). An introduction to social network analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, 2005(107), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.157
Dellavalle, R. P., Schilling, L. M., Rodriguez, M. A., Van de Sompel, H., & Bollen, J. (2007). Refining dermatology journal impact factors using PageRank. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(1), 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.03.005
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Floyd, S. W., Schroeder, D. M., & Finn, D. M. (1994). “Only if I`m first author”: conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 734-747. https://doi.org/10.5465/256709
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108-111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1749965
Glavič, P. (2020). Identifying Key Issues of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(16), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166500
Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information Inc.
Huckle, J. (2002). Reconstructing nature: Towards a geographical education for sustanaible development. Geography, 87(1), 64-72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40573638
Haigh, M. (2003). Internationalising the university curriculum: Response to M.G. Jackson. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), 331-340. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278225387_Internationalising_the_university_curriculum_Response_to_MG_Jackson
Hook, P. A. (2007). Domain maps: purposes, history, parallels with cartography, and applications. In 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV`07) (pp. 442-446). IEEE.
Hakimi, S. L. (1964). Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Operations research, 12(3), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.12.3.450
Huang, J. H., Duan, X. Y., He, F. F., Wang, G. J., & Hu, X. Y. (2021). A historical review and Bibliometric analysis of research on Weak measurement research over the past decades based on Biblioshiny. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11375. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.11375.pdf
Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
Hasslöf, H., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Critical thinking as room for subjectification in Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.940854
Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. R. (1996). Education for sustainability. Earthscan.
Hinzen, H., & Schmitt, S. (2016). Agenda 2030-Education and lifelong learning in the sustainable development goals. DVV International, Institut für Internationale Zusammenarbeit des Deutschen Hochschul-Verbandes eV. https://www.dvv-international.de/fileadmin/files/Inhalte_Bilder_und_Dokumente/Materialien/IPE/IPE_75_EN_web.pdf
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists` perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291
Haustein, S., Tunger, D., Heinrichs, G., & Baelz, G. (2011). Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?. Scientometrics, 86(3), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4
Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 471-501. https://doi.org/10.5465/256589
Imperatives, S. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Accessed Feb, 10, 1-300. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Japhet, B. (2013). A critique of Latour and Woolgar`s argument for the social construction of scientific facts in laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts (1986). Социология науки и технологий, 4(4), 30-39. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-critique-of-Latour-and-Woolgar``s-argument-for-of-Japhet/cc335d6adc72e7520243261ab5f68c5eafde7930
Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 7(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
Kaivola, T., & Cabral, S. (2004). Implementing education for active citizenship and sustainability. Geography, 89(3), 278-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2004.12094106
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Lemons, J. (1992). Ecological Literacy and the University--Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World by David W. Orr. BioScience, 42(9), 708-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1312179
Lawani, S. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1-2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (Vol. 5). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261445?2=null&queryId=406f6610-30d6-4ce6-9f1f-2f29bff6834e
Logan, E. L., & Shaw, W. M. (1991). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in a medical specialty. Scientometrics, 20(3), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019762
Lou, W., & Qiu, J. (2014). Semantic information retrieval research based on co-occurrence analysis. Online Information Review, 38(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2012-0203
Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political economy, 108(3), 632-662. https://doi.org/10.1086/262132
Michie, J. (1994). Reviews -- Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition by Ronald S. Burt: The journal of the royal economic society. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 685-686. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234645
Molenda, M. (2003). Cone of experience. Educational technology: An encyclopedia, 161-165. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.612.454&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social networks, 24(4), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3
Massimo Aria (2021a). Bibliometrix R Package. https://www.bibliometrix.org/
Massimo Aria (2021b). biblioshiny for bibliometrix. http://127.0.0.1:6219/
McCormick, B. H., DeFanti, T. A., & Brown, M. D. (1987, November). Visualization in Scientific Computing. The NSF Advisory Panel on Computer Graphics, 21, 6, New York, NY, United States.
Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration. Scientometrics, 61(3), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000045120.04489.80
Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 800-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.006
McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE≠ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental education research, 9(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303469
McKeown, R., & Nolet, V. (2012). Schooling for sustainable development in Canada and the United States (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.
Mulà, I., & Tilbury, D. (2009). Progress and Possibilities for the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) in EU Member States: An ENSI report. Cheltenham, UK: ENSI. https://www.ensi.org/global/downloads/Publications/311/ENSI%20Report%20English.pdf
Newman, M. E. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 98(2), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
Nicolaisen, J., & Hjørland, B. (2007). Practical potentials of Bradford`s law: A critical examination of the received view. Journal of documentation, 63(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710743298
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.
Price, D. J. (1965). The science of science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 21(8), 2-8.
Postma, D. W. (2002). Taking the future seriously: On the inadequacies of the framework of liberalism for environmental education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00258
Prakash, M. S. (1995). Ecological literacy for moral virtue: Orr on [moral] education for postmodern sustainability. Journal of Moral Education, 24(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724950240101
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31–38. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G
Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 1115-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). Expectations for a scientific collaboratory: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work (pp. 68-74). https://doi.org/10.1145/958160.958171
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual review of information science and technology, 41(1), 643-681. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109-127. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1177/0038038588022001007
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of information Science, 6(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105
Selvi, M. (2004). Environmental education for sustainable development. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 13(9), 900-902. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285200240_Environmental_education_for_sustainable_development
Swedberg, R. (1994). Book reviews: Networks -- Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition by Ronald S. Burt. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 426-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234645
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer publishing company. https://parsmodir.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/MetaSynBook.pdf
Summers, M., Corney, G., & Childs, A. (2004). Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: the starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educational research, 46(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222449
Shu, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Looking Back to Move Forward: A Bibliometric Analysis of Consumer Privacy Research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 727-747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040042
Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental education research, 1(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010206
United Nations (1993). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/Agenda%2021.pdf
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992). Agenda 21. In United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (pp. 1–351), Rio de Janeiro: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21
United Nations Economic and Social Council (1996). Promoting education, public awareness and training：Report of the Secretary-General Addendum. https://undocs.org/en/E/CN.17/1996/14/Add.1
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1997). Educating for a sustainable future: a transdisciplinary vision for concerted action. International Conference on Environment and Society: Education and Public Awareness for Sustainability, Thessaloniki, Greece. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000110686?1=null&queryId=c5cfa07b-e935-4cc2-8432-34d2f063ad1f
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1988). Sustainable Development Via Environmental Education. UNESCO-UNEP environmental education newsletter, 13(2), 1-8. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000153582?1=null&queryId=58b4a822-8336-4584-9542-d29fabdd14f8
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2003). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014): Framework for the international implementation scheme. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000131163?6=null&queryId=abd54ffb-2e1e-4024-a552-3c232398f1f2
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2005). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014): international implementation scheme. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148654?3=null&queryId=e65ed52b-ef3e-4293-ab93-a6a40df3f06c
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2006). Framework for the UNDESD international implementation scheme. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148650?1=null&queryId=9dc4acc5-6b8b-467c-a624-2998b058c8d0
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development 2009: key findings & ways forward. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000187757
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2013, June). ESD: A sound investment to accelerate African development. https://i.unu.edu/media/unu.edu/event/35442/TICAD-V-Side-Event-UNESCO_1.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Division for Inclusion, Peace and Sustainable Development, Education Sector.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, & German Commission for UNESCO (2009). UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development: 31 March-2 April 2009, Bonn, Germany: proceedings. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000185056?8=null&queryId=18566c4a-ed6b-42c4-9b46-42bf6b85f5ef
Vilela, M. (2006). The Earth Charter and the quest for a more sustainable and peaceful world. Development, 49(3), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100278
Vanz, S. A. D. S., & Stumpf, I. R. C. (2010). Scientific collaboration: theoretical and conceptual review. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 15(2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362010000200004
Wals, A. E. J. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development: Learning for a sustainable world 2009. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000184944?1=null&queryId=aa0eb5df-11fd-43bb-9825-a253152bf36e
Wang, C. H., & Chen, S. C. (2014). Bibliometric and social network analysis for data mining: the intellectual structure of tourism destination literature. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 42(1), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20120285
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wenwen, W. U., Yaofei, X. I. E., Xiangxiang, L. I. U., Yaohua, G. U., Yuting ZHANG, X. T., & Xiaodong, T. A. N. (2019). Analysis of scientific collaboration networks among authors, institutions, and countries studying adolescent myopia prevention and control: a review article. Iranian journal of public health, 48(4), 621-631. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i4.983
World Education Forum. (2015). Incheon declaration: Education 2030-Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233137
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107-2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21128
Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., & Tsuji, K. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors` roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3), 643-655. https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1007/s11192-006-0113-1
Zhou, J., Zeng, A., Fan, Y., & Di, Z. (2018). Identifying important scholars via directed scientific collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1327-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2619-0		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200693en_US